Agenda packet — Santa Ana City Council, May 5, 2026 (part 12 of 13)

*Recorded by: Steve Mikesell, ICF *Date: 9/8/11  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
Research conducted by MBA suggests that the Orange County maintains four vehicle repair facilities: this one; another in Santa Ana; one in Anaheim; and one in Crown Valley. Again, these do not appear to be maintenance stations in the manner of stateowned facilities but rather specialized vehicle repair facilities. It is likely that most county-maintained maintenance yards are similar to the subject property, with sheds to store and shops to repair the equipment that is needed to repair county roads.

Evaluation of Significance under National Register Criterion A and California Register Criterion 1 Available evidence does not support a conclusion that the Maintenance Yard in Santa Ana is eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion A or California Register under Criterion 1, for its contribution to the transportation history of the County or region. The facility was used to maintain vehicles that were owned by the County to repair and maintain county roads. That vehicle maintenance function does not appear to constitute association “with events that have made significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history.” One should stipulate that the development of a road system was assuredly a key occurrence in the broad pattern of history in Orange County and in all of California, which led the nation in the development of a “car culture” and an automobile-based transportation system. It is less certain, however, that this facility for maintaining county road vehicles is significantly associated with the broader theme of developing a road system in the county. As noted in National Register Bulletin 15, “How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation,” “Mere association with historic events or trends is not enough, in and of itself, to qualify under Criterion A: the property's specific association must be considered important as well. For example, a building historically in commercial use must be shown to have been significant in commercial history.” Neither does it appear that the Maintenance Yard is significant within the more limited context of the development of highway-related maintenance facilities.

As a class, maintenance yards played a minor role in the making of a highway system in California. There is little reason to conclude that this property was significant within that limited context. Lacking significance, the property does not appear to qualify for National Register listing under Criterion A or California Register listing under Criterion 1.

Research conducted by MBA indicates that Orange County acquired this property in 1919 to house equipment owned by two county departments: the Road Department and the Agricultural Department. The warehouse building (identified as Building 9 in the MBA analysis) was used by the Agricultural Department from its construction in the early 1920s through the late 1940s. Most of the rest of the buildings were constructed in the 1920s for use by the Road Department. Building 3 was built in the 1920s and is currently used as a “tune up, lube shop, and car wash.” Building 4 was also built in the 1920s and is used for storage. Building 5 was built before 1928 and is a welding shop. Building 7 was built in the early 1940s and enlarged in the 1950s; it is a parts warehouse. Building 7 was built in the 1920s and is a paint and tire shop. Building 8 was built in the 1940s and is a tire storage shed. Building x is a 1960s gasoline station. Building y is a ca. 1990 truck storage building. Finally, Building z is an open shed that was built ca. 1970. (These building numbers were assigned by MBA and it should be noted that they do not reflect the numbering system used by the County.) In addition, the Maintenance Yard includes two additional buildings, with street addresses of 1143 and 1140 East Fruit Street. These likely date to the 1980s and are functionally part of the larger Maintenance Yard.

The buildings, in addition to being constructed over a long period of time, are only loosely related to the development of the road system of Orange County. The buildings were associated directly with the maintenance of county-owned vehicles, which in turn were used to support maintenance of the roads of the county. In this regard, the buildings are best considered within the context of automobile and truck repair facilities in the county, whether operated by the county or by private mechanics. In any event, this association with vehicle storage and repair does not constitute an important association with the development of a road system in Orange County.

Evaluation of Significance under National Register Criterion B and California Register Criterion 2 The historical research conducted by MBA and additional research conducted for the grade separation project does not suggest that this property is associated with a person who is important to our history. All references in the historical record are to the agency – the Orange County Road Department – without reference to any specific individual. Based upon research to date, there is no evidence to support a finding that this property is eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion B or California Register Criteiron 2.

Evaluation of Significance under National Register Criterion C and California Register Criterion 3 Available evidence does not support a conclusion that the Orange County Road Department Maintenance Yard Fruit Street in Santa Ana is eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion C or California Register under Criterion 3. It does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction and it does not represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction.

As noted earlier, the collection of buildings at the Maintenance Yard are best considered as a potential historic district. The buildings are related functionally and were all built by Orange County. Although they were built over a long period of time, the buildings resemble one another in their utilitarian appearance, particularly in the fact that nearly all are sided in corrugated metal and most feature characteristic metal industrial sash.
(See Continuation Sheet)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2951 5/5/2026
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 4 of 4 ends

*Recorded by: Steve Mikesell, ICF *Date: 9/8/11  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
These buildings do not collectively represent an important example of industrial design, whether considered within the contexts of Orange County, Southern California, or California generally. Orange County was until recent decades a center for produce packing and there exist in the county dozens of important industrial buildings from that heritage, including: the National Register-listed Elephant Packing House in Fullerton, a cluster of industrial buildings on Santa Fe Avenue in Fullerton; a cluster of industrial buildings in Irvine Village; and numerous industrial packing buildings in the National Register listed historic district in Orange (ICF retains a printout of the OHP Historic Resource Inventory for Orange County; this list was derived from that copy of the HRI.). This discussion is not meant to suggest that Orange County includes an abundance of important examples of industrial design, but rather that historical industrial buildings are not rare in Orange County.

The cluster of buildings at the Maintenance Yard do not appear to represent a distinguished entity when considered as an ensemble of industrial structures. Most are of a simple gabled roof; the notable exceptions are Building 6, with its sawtoothed roof, Building 8, which has a shed roof; and the post-World War II buildings, which feature flat or very shallow gabled roof forms.

Taken as a whole, this complex does not appear to represent an important collection of industrial buildings. The collection has some degree of consistency in that the bulk of the buildings are metal sided. None of the buildings are important individually and the collection as a whole is not an important example of industrial design in Orange County, Southern California, or California in general.

Discussion of integrity
The integrity of this property can be measured in two ways: the integrity of individual buildings and the integrity of the collection of buildings.

For the most part, the individual buildings appear to retain a good degree of integrity. The exceptions are Building 6, which was expanded well after original construction, and Building 8, which was similarly expanded several decades after it was constructed.

The integrity of the complex, however, is questionable because the complex was constructed over a period of approximately sixty years. An arguement for exceptional significance and a very long period of significance does not appear to be appropriate and, therefore, it would be difficult to conclude the complex retains integrity to any particular historical period of construction.

Conclusion
The 2004 conclusion that the Maintenance Yard is eligible for listing in the National Register under Criteria A or C and California Register under Criteria 1 or 3 is not supported by the facts. The property was only loosely related to the development of a road system in Orange County and does not qualify for that association and for that reason does not appear to meet National Register Criterion A and California Register Criterion 1. The property is not an important example of industrial design and for that reason does not appear to meet National Register Criterion C and California Register Criterion 3. Finally, the integrity of the property is marginal if the three post-1945 buildings are included in the evaluation, as is required under cultural resource best practices and the requirements of the National Register program. For these reasons, the Maintenance Yard does not meet the criteria for listing in the National Register and the California Register.

R7. References
California Department of Transportation, District 12, Historic Property Survey Report, Santa Ana Art Wall Project, 8/26/2004.

E-mail from Christeen Taniguchi to Dana Supernowicz, “Answers to Santa Ana Art Wall Questions,” December 2, 2004.

E-mail from Dana Supernowicz to Christeen Taniguchi, “Re: Answers to Santa Ana Art Wall Questions,” December 6, 2004.

The early history of city, county, and state highways is summarized in Ben Blow, California Highways: A Descriptive Record of Road Development by the State and by Such Counties as Have Paved Highways, 1920. An excellent summary of the situation about 30 years later is found in California Highways and Public Works, Centennial Edition, September 9, 1950.

James Fisher, “Inventory and Evaluation of Facilities Owned by The California Department of Transportation: Maintenance Stations,” January 2000.
www.specialdistricts.org details how these San Bernardino County special districts operate.

OHP Historic Resource Inventory for Orange County; this list was derived from that copy of the HRI.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2952 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2953 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2954 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2955 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2956 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2957 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2958 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2959 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2960 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2961 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2962 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2963 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2964 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2965 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2966 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2967 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2968 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2969 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2970 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2971 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2972 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2973 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2974 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2975 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

Other Identifier:
*
Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted a. County
b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ; R ; 1/4 of 1/4 of Sec ; B.M. c. Address City Zip
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear feature) Zone , mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g. parcel #, legal description, directions to resource, elevation, additional UTMs, etc. as app * P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries.) * P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) * P4. Resources Present:

The property located at 1140 E Fruit Street contains several buildings on a long rectangular parcel. The buildings are one-story, rectangular in plan, and are surrounded by an asphalt parking lot. The northwestern building (Building 1) is located along the northern border of the parcel, which has a medium-pitched side-gable roof with medal siding. The building is asymmetrically divided with casement windows and metal doors, some which are sheltered by awnings. Located to the south, adjacent to Building 1 is Building 2, a temporary building that was added recently to the lot. Another temporary building is free standing, located between Buildings 1 and 4. The northeastern building (Building 4) is composed of concrete block and features a lowpitched side-gable roof with overhanging eaves and exposed rafter tails. The building extends south along the parcel boundary with the primary façade facing west; the fenestration is asymmetrically divided, containing metal doors and windows. Building 6 is located in the middle of the parcel, and also appears to be a recent structure added to the lot. At the southern parcel boundary is a large open-air metal structure, and a smaller utility shed (Building 8) along the southwest parcel boundary.

HP14 Government building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northeast elevation, view southwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
c 1950
County of Orange
1143 E Fruit Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2976 5/5/2026
Orange County Maintenance Yard
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1140 E Fruit Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

The buildings located on the parcel appear to have been constructed or moved to the lot circa 1950 to 1980s.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance c 1950 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) The property is not strongly related to the development of a road system in Orange County and that association alone is not sufficient to meet Criterion A, as suggested in the 2004 evaluation designation for the adjacent parcel. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore, it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1140 Fruit Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. The property is not an important example of industrial design and is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2977 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

The building located at 1160-1172 E Fruit Street is one-story, L-shape in plan, and designed in a Modern style. Capped by a flat roof, the building is composed of tilt-up concrete construction. Asymmetrically divided into two sections, the most projecting section is void of fenestration. The primary entrances are located off of the east and recessed north elevations. They are composed of metal and glass doors and sheltered by awnings. Each entrance bay is framed by a concrete pilaster and caped by a belt course. A large asphalt clad parking lot is sited within the L-shape area, and the parcel is framed by a newly constructed metal fence.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northeast elevation, view southwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1960
Los Dos Amigos
1170 E Fruit Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2978 5/5/2026
1160-1172 E Fruit Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1160-1172 E Fruit Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

Building permit #12524 was issued to Tom Markham in 1960. This permit shows that the following addresses had been combined: 1160, 1162, 1164, 1166, 1168, 1170 and 1172 E. Fruit Street. The permit was for a large storage & manufacturing building, valued at $70,000.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1960. Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) No buildings appear at this address/parcel on the 1949 Sanborn Map (Map sheet #32). There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner Tom Markham, associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1160-1172 Fruit Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2979 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures, and objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, etc.) * P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
* P7. Owner and Address:
* P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, address)
* P9. Date Recorded:
* P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
* P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report/other sources or "none") * Attachments: NONE
Archaeological Record
Location Map
District Record
Sketch Map
Linear Feature Record
Continuation Sheet
Milling Station Record
Building, Structure, and Object Record
Rock Art Record Artifact Record
Photograph Record Other: (List)
Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) Prehistoric Historic Both
DPR 523A (1/95) * Required Information
6Z
742-744 N Eastwood Avenue
Map Reference #23
Orange
742-744 N Eastwood Ave
Assessor Parcel Number: 398-374-01 TR 344 LOT 1 BLK A POR OF LOT 2 BLK A The duplex at 742-744 N. Eastwood Avenue, has a "C" shape, a flat roof with no eaves and a generally boxy appearance. There is a wide fascia board along the top of the walls. The building is clad in stucco which may not be entirely original. The primary façade faces N. Eastwood Avenue; however, the property is at the southwest corner of N. Eastwood Avenue and Fruit Street, and the associated garage faces and is accessed from Fruit Street. Both entrances face one another towards the middle of the building, with pent roofs with composition shingle and solid balustrades. The fenestration appears to be replacement vinyl sliding sash, fixed pane and metal sliding sash, encased in thick wood frames. There appears to be one original, vertical, one-over-over doublehung wood sash on the primary façade. The landscape consists of a lawn.

HP03 Multifamily property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northeast elevation, view southwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
c 1920
Pacific Legacy Real Estate Ivest
17853 Santiago Blvd #1104-454
Villa Park, CA 92861
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2980 5/5/2026
742-744 N Eastwood Avenue
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 742-744 N Eastwood Avenue
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Multi-Family Residential
Architectural Style: elements of the Spanish Colonial Revival Construction History:

No original building permit was located. A permit to reroof the residence in 1944 (Building Permit# 4399) was issued to owner Frances Force.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Multi-Family Residential
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance c 1920 Property Type MF Residence Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) 742 Eastwood – A "C"-shaped duplex was shown at this address on the 1949 revised Santa Ana Sanborn Maps. This duplex has a modest footprint and was one-story high. The address is 742-742½ Eastwood Avenue. A small, possibly one-car, one-story garage is located to the south and west of the residence. The 1954 city directory identifies the occupant at 742 Eastwood as J. (Jack) L.

Williams and his wife Peggy. Jack Williams was an employee at Douglas LB, possibly the Douglas Aircraft facility in Long Beach. At 744 Eastwood Avenue was L. (Loren) F. Stone and his wife Lorene. Loren was a lineman for Edison (the electric company later called Southern California Edison). 744 is likely the revised address for 742½ Eastwood Avenue.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No persons of significance at the local, state, or national level, making 1019 E. Washington Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. 742-744 N Eastwood Avenue has lost integrity of materials, design and workmanship, through alterations and replacement of original character-defining features, such as windows and exterior wall treatment. 742-744 N Eastwood Avenue is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
Sanborn Maps, 1954 city directory
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2981 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures, and objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, etc.) * P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
* P7. Owner and Address:
* P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, address)
* P9. Date Recorded:
* P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
* P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report/other sources or "none") * Attachments: NONE
Archaeological Record
Location Map
District Record
Sketch Map
Linear Feature Record
Continuation Sheet
Milling Station Record
Building, Structure, and Object Record
Rock Art Record Artifact Record
Photograph Record Other: (List)
Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) Prehistoric Historic Both
DPR 523A (1/95) * Required Information
6Z
741 N Eastwood Avenue
Map Reference #24
Orange
741 N Eastwood Ave
Assessor Parcel Number:398-371-32 N TR 344 BLK B LOT 1. 741 N. Eastwood Avenue in Santa Ana is a multi-family residence situated at the southeast corner of N. Eastwood Avenue and Fruit Street. This Minimal Traditional-style residence has a low-pitch, hipped roof with shallow eaves. The roof is covered with composition shingle. Fenestration appears to consist of original wood, double-hung sash. The exterior is clad in stucco. The unit facing N. Eastwood Avenue is three bays wide with an inset, half-width porch. The roof extension of the porch is supported by wood posts, with a simple wood balustrade. The front door, which is obscured by a metal security door, is accessed from the raised front porch. The exposed window on the primary façade is sheltered by a canvas awning. The unit also has a bay window facing Fruit Street. There is a two-car garage, inset between the two attached units, facing Fruit Street. 1214 Fruit Street, which is the secondary address for this property, has an inset front entry supported by a single corner post. A solid wood balustrade with a diamond section on top provides a wall around a projecting porch pad. This façade contains two bays, both windows. The property is bounded by a low metal fence. The landscape is a mix of open grassy areas and mature trees.

HP03 Multifamily property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
West elevation, view east.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1952 Building Permit
Abel Bernal & Juana Hernandez
1214 E Fruit Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2982 5/5/2026
741 N Eastwood Avenue and 1214 E Fruit Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 741 N Eastwood Avenue
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Multi-Family Residential
Architectural Style: Minimal Traditional
Construction History:

Jasper Farney was issued a building permit (#2879) on June 11, 1952 for a 8 room duplex and garages at this location. This building has a secondary address at 1214 Fruit Street.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Multi-Family Residential
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1952 Property Type MF Residence Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) 741 Eastwood – No building appears on the lot at 743 Eastwood Avenue on the 1949 revised Santa Ana Sanborn Maps. In 1954, the city directory lists T. (Thomas) O. Martin, an accountant with Diehl & Company, living at this address with his wife Beverly.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No persons of significance at the local, state, or national level, making 741 N. Eastwood Avenue ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2.741 N. Eastwood Avenue is a good, but not exceptional, example of Minimal Traditional residential architecture; it lacks some integrity of materials, design and workmanship. 741 N. Eastwood Avenue is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
1954 city directory
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2983 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures, and objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, etc.) * P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
* P7. Owner and Address:
* P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, address)
* P9. Date Recorded:
* P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
* P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report/other sources or "none") * Attachments: NONE
Archaeological Record
Location Map
District Record
Sketch Map
Linear Feature Record
Continuation Sheet
Milling Station Record
Building, Structure, and Object Record
Rock Art Record Artifact Record
Photograph Record Other: (List)
Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) Prehistoric Historic Both
DPR 523A (1/95) * Required Information
6Z
742 N Grand Avenue
Map Reference #25
Orange
742 N Grand Ave
Assessor Parcel Number: 398-371-01 TR 344 LOT 12 BLK B ALL -EX S 24 FT. 742 N. Grand Avenue was moved to this location in 1945. It is not known when it was originally constructed or why it was removed, but it was previously located at 510 E. First Street in Santa Ana. It is a one-and-a-half story, gable-front and wing residence, clad in wood shiplap siding. It has a cross-gable roof; the side-gable portion has a high pitch, while the front-gable wing has a lower profile roof. Wood pickets are placed in the side-gable end. The roof has composition shingle. The front wing displays a bay window with a hipped roof tucked under the front gable. There is a pent roof with a single wood bracket over the front entrance, which is situated up against the front-gable wing. The front door is a replacement. The fenestration consists of replacement horizontal sliding sash and original two-over-two, wood, double-hung vertical sash. There is an associated side-gable garage at the rear of the property, accessed from Fruit Street. The lawn, which contains a few bushes and mature trees, is bounded by a metal chain-link fence.

HP02 Single family property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northeast elevation, view southwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1910 TRW/Experian
DSLMA MTG Loan Trust
Unavailable
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2984 5/5/2026
742 N Grand Avenue
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 742 N Grand Avenue
*
Historic Name: 510 First Street
Common Name
Original Use: SF Residential
Architectural Style: National
Construction History:

The original construction state for this residence is not known. It was moved to its current location in 1945 (building permit #5654) from 510 E.

First Street (building permit for that address was not found). The owner in 1945 was Mildred B. Burnette.

Moved? 510 First Street, Santa Ana
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: SF Residential
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date 1945 Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1910 Property Type SF Residence Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) 742 Grande Street was moved to this location in 1945. It is not known why this house was moved, when it was originally constructed or who was the original owner. The property appears on the 1949 revised Santa Ana Sanborn Maps in its current location. This corner lot also shares the address 1226 Fruit Street. The Sanborn Maps shows a one-car garage was located at the rear of the property; it is unlikely that this garage was constructed at the same time as the residence and moved to the new location in 1945. Mrs. Burnette, the owner in 1945, still lived at this location in 1954, per the city directory. Mrs. Burnette is buried at Fairhaven Memorial Park in Santa Ana. She lived from 1890 to 1956. No other information about Mrs. Burnette was located during the research phase of this project.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. Research did not indicate that Mildred Burnette is considered to be a person of significance at the local, state, or national level, making 742 N. Grand Avenue ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. 742 N. Grand Avenue has lost integrity of materials, design, workmanship, location, and setting.742 N. Grand Avenue is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit, 1949 Sanborn Map
1954 city directory
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2985 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures, and objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, etc.) * P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
* P7. Owner and Address:
* P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, address)
* P9. Date Recorded:
* P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
* P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report/other sources or "none") * Attachments: NONE
Archaeological Record
Location Map
District Record
Sketch Map
Linear Feature Record
Continuation Sheet
Milling Station Record
Building, Structure, and Object Record
Rock Art Record Artifact Record
Photograph Record Other: (List)
Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) Prehistoric Historic Both
DPR 523A (1/95) * Required Information
6Z
1041 E 6th Street
Map Reference #26
Orange
1041 E 6th St
Assessor Parcel Number: 398-361-12 SANTA ANA EAST LOT BLK 31 POR OF BLK. 606 Terminal Way, also noted as 1041 E. 6th Street, in Santa Ana is currently used as a automotive-related business. The long, rectangular shed-like building has a front-gable, medium-pitched roof. It is set far back from 6th Street. The exterior is clad in corrugated sheet metal. It has three bays along the primary façade, symmetrically divided. The double-door entrance is located at the center and is sheltered by a detached canopy with corrugated metal sheeting. To the left of the entry is a non-original, metal sliding sash window with false muntins, sheltered by a canvas awning. Below the sill is a flat piece of wood attached by wood brackets and jutting away from the wall. This may be used as a counter or shelf. To the right of the entry is another window set, containing two replacement metal or vinyl vertically sliding sash with a large muntin in between.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
South elevation, view north.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1920 Building Permit
Batool S Japelaghi
17 Colonial
Irvine, CA 92620
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2986 5/5/2026
1041 E 6th Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1041 E 6th Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Utilitarian
Construction History:

This building was constructed in 1920. This building has a secondary address as 606 Terminal Way.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1920 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) According to the 1954 city directory, 600 Terminal Way was the Nic-L Silver Battery Company and 606 Terminal Way was the Lippincott Lead Company and Sun Battery Company. Both firms were owned by C.G. Lippincott, who resided at that time in Santa Ana. Further review of the 1949 Sanborn Map shows that there were five buildings in this general location: 600 and 602 Terminal Way were two large rectangular for fabricating processed rock; 601 Terminal Way was a machine shop and 603 was third, smaller building used for rock processing. The fifth building was 606 Terminal, noted as the Sun Battery Company. This large building was drawn with multiple interior partitions and was shown to be a battery lead melting facility. 600, 602, 603 and 606 Terminal Way are no longer on the premises. The current 606 Terminal Way may be the former Sun Battery Company Machine Shop, formerly at 601 Terminal Way. There is no longer any association with the former lead processing operation at this location.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
Sanborn Fire Insurance maps, 1954 city directory
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2987 5/5/2026
Page of * Resource Name or #: 1041 E 6th Street
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HR #
3 Trinomial
(Assigned by recorder
* Recorded by: Elizabeth Hilton * Date: 8/23/2011
Continuation Update
3 P3a. Significance: (Continued)
This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction; it has been altered and lacks integrity of materials, design and workmanship, as well as setting and association. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

DPR 523L (1/95) * Required Information
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2988 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures, and objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, etc.) * P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
* P7. Owner and Address:
* P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, address)
* P9. Date Recorded:
* P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
* P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report/other sources or "none") * Attachments: NONE
Archaeological Record
Location Map
District Record
Sketch Map
Linear Feature Record
Continuation Sheet
Milling Station Record
Building, Structure, and Object Record
Rock Art Record Artifact Record
Photograph Record Other: (List)
Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) Prehistoric Historic Both
DPR 523A (1/95) * Required Information
6Z
1041 E 6th Street
Map Reference #27
Orange
1041 E 6th St
Assessor Parcel Number: 398-361-03 SEC 7 T 5 R 9 1.09 AC -EXAP 9-140-13 & ST. 1041 E. 6th Street is a large industrial building. It has two volumes: a small one-story front block with a mansard roof and a large two-story warehouse addition at the back. The front wing is set back from the plane of the back wing on the west side and extends past the plane of the back wing on the east side. It has the depth of a single room. The quasi-mansard roof (only used near the corners) is clad with red tile. The exterior is clad in T11 siding above the belt course; below the belt course is a brick veneer. The primary façade is four bays, symmetrically divided. The windows to the left are tripartite, fixed sash and the windows to the right are paired fixed sash. All windows have metal security bars. The warehouse wing at the back has a barrel roof obscured by a parapet and (concrete) brick construction, with no visible decoration or ornamentation. No windows or doors to this section were visible from the public right-of-way. According to aerial maps (Bing and Google), there are two large garage-style openings on the east side, which are mirrored on the west side. The landscaping consists of an associated parking lot to the east.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Southwest elevation, view northeast.
2 Santa Ana 92701
c1960
David E Roche
1051 E 6th Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2989 5/5/2026
1041 E 6th Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1041 E 6th Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

Building Permit #8014 was issued in 1946 to owner H.G. Gooder for a 20' x 50' lumber storage shed at this address.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance c1960 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This property does not appear on the 1949 Sanborn map. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner H. G. Gooder, are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1041 E. 6th Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
1949 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2990 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view west.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1947 Building Permit
Ronald & Havis Sewell
530 N Terminal Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2991 5/5/2026
530 Terminal Way
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 530 Terminal Way
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

Building Permit #8710 was issued for a concrete brick manufacturing building at this address in 1947. The owner at that time was H.G. Gooder.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

King, Jr. No information about the firm or the owners was located during the research phase. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner H.G. Gooder, associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 530 Terminal Way ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2992 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures, and objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, etc.) * P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
* P7. Owner and Address:
* P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, address)
* P9. Date Recorded:
* P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
* P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report/other sources or "none") * Attachments: NONE
Archaeological Record
Location Map
District Record
Sketch Map
Linear Feature Record
Continuation Sheet
Milling Station Record
Building, Structure, and Object Record
Rock Art Record Artifact Record
Photograph Record Other: (List)
Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) Prehistoric Historic Both
DPR 523A (1/95) * Required Information
6Z
510 Terminal Way
Map Reference #29
Orange
510 Terminal Wy
Assessor Parcel Number: 398-362-02 SEC 7 T 5 R 9 40 FT LOT 506 Terminal Way is a one-story industrial building with a flat roof, five bays and a symmetrically divided primary façade. The exterior is clad in smooth stucco. The main bay, located at the south end of the primary façade, is occupied by a large garage-style opening for equipment. To it's north is are two windows; one is large, square and the other is smaller and set higher up on the facade. Both windows have metal mesh screens which obscure them. To the north of these two windows is the main entrance, a single personnel door. Just to its right is a window with steel frames, muntins and mullions and glass block, with an air conditioning unit installed above it. Over this window and the main entry door is a flat, cantilevered canopy with deep horizontal scoping. There is no associated landscaping.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view west.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1925 Building Permit
Ray & Laura Connelly Trust
420 Terminal Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2993 5/5/2026
510 Terminal Way
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 510 Terminal Way
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

Building permit #12779 was issued November 10, 1925 for 506-512 N. Terminal Way. The property was described as a warehouse. The owner was George Ketscher.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1925 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This property was not on the 1906 Sanborn Map of Santa Ana. The 1949 Sanborn Map (Map sheet # 39) shows 510 Terminal Way was a machine shop, and was also noted as 516 Terminal Way (which may indicate that properties on this street were renumbered). Directly north of 510 Terminal Way, and sharing a common way, was the narrow 512 Terminal Way building. The map notes that this is an unused dryer room. To the south of 510 Terminal Way was "Unit F," used for storage. This may have been 508 Terminal Way. There were interior openings between all three buildings at that time. The 1954 City directory identifies the Connelly Machine Works at this address, owned by Le Roy G. Connelly, who resided in Tustin.

Connelly, associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 510 Terminal Way ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It lacks integrity of materials, design and workmanship. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
1949 Sanborn Map, 1954 city directory
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2994 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view west.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1925 Building Permit
Ray & Laura Connelly Trust
420 N Terminal Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2995 5/5/2026
508 Terminal Way
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 508 Terminal Way
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

Building permit #12779 was issued November 10, 1925 for 506-512 N. Terminal Way. The property was described as a warehouse. The owner was George Ketscher.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

There were interior openings between all three buildings at that time.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. A variety of companies have occupied this building since it was originally constructed, and no specific persons, such as original owner George Ketscher, associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 508Terminal Way ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value, lacks integrity of materials and design, and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
1954 city directory, Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2996 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view west.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1925 Building Permit
Ray & Laura Connelly Trust
420 N Terminal Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2997 5/5/2026
506 Terminal Way
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 506 Terminal Way
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

Building permit #12779 was issued November 10, 1925 for 506-512 N. Terminal Way. The property was described as a warehouse. The owner was George Ketscher.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1925 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This property was not on the 1906 Sanborn Map of Santa Ana. No property is specifically identified as "508 Terminal Way," on the revised 1949 Sanborn Maps. The 1954 city directory does not have a listing for 508 Terminal Way; 504 Terminal Way is listed as vacant, while 510-512 Terminal is the Connelly Machine Works. The 1949 Sanborn Map (Map sheet # 39) shows 510 Terminal Way was a machine shop, and was also noted as 516 Terminal Way (which may indicate that properties on this street were renumbered). . To the south of 510 Terminal Way was "Unit F," used for storage. Attached to "Unit F" was "Unit E," which shared a common wall with "Unit F" but had no interior openings between them. This may have become 506 Terminal Way. It was used at that time for auto repairing.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. A variety of companies have occupied this building since it was originally constructed, and no specific persons, such as original owner George Ketscher, associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 506 Terminal Way ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction; it lacks integrity of materials and design. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, 1954 city directory
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2998 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

This wall also marks the different roof profiles; the volume to the south has a shallow marquee. The exterior is clad in metal siding. Fenestration appears to be replacement metal or vinyl horizontally sliding sash, all obscured by metal mesh security screens. There are two entrances facing Terminal Way, the primary (east) façade. One is a solid personnel door and the second is a wood door with a glass pane in the upper panel. Further north on the primary façade are two garage-style openings. The property occupies most of the parcel and has no landscaping except for a line of trees along the railroad alignment; there is a associated parking area to the south.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Southeast elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1922 TRW/Experian
Ray & Laura Connelly Trust
420 N Terminal Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 2999 5/5/2026
420 Terminal Way
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 420 Terminal Way
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

No building permit was located. Electrical and plumbing permits were located from 1962. The address was listed as 422-430 N. Terminal Way.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1922, 1962 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This property appears on the revised 1949 Sanborn Maps as 422 Terminal Way. At that time, the southern wing, with the square footprint, had not yet been constructed. There is no listing for 420 or 422 Terminal Way in the 1954 city directory. 504 Terminal Way is listed as vacant. The city permits file for this property show no demolition for this property. In 1962, several permits were issued for 420-430 N. Terminal Way, including electrical and plumbing permits, and a permit for a paint spray booth. The owner of the property was identified in the permits as H.G. Gooder. This may indicate a new building at this location in 1962. In 1975, the building was resided on two walls. The owner at that time was Jay Rider.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, are known to have been associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 420 Terminal Way ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks integrity of materials, design and workmanship. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3000 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures, and objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, etc.) * P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
* P7. Owner and Address:
* P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, address)
* P9. Date Recorded:
* P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
* P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report/other sources or "none") * Attachments: NONE
Archaeological Record
Location Map
District Record
Sketch Map
Linear Feature Record
Continuation Sheet
Milling Station Record
Building, Structure, and Object Record
Rock Art Record Artifact Record
Photograph Record Other: (List)
Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) Prehistoric Historic Both
DPR 523A (1/95) * Required Information
6Z
531 Terminal Way
Map Reference #33
Orange
531 Terminal Wy
Assessor Parcel Number: 398-381-01 SEC 7 T 5 R 9 LOT 50 X 100 FT 531 Terminal Way is likely a wood frame building with a corrugated metal skin. It is two stories high, with a front-gable roof. The main façade, facing west towards Terminal Way, has three bays and is asymmetrically divided. The façade displays two solid personnel doors, with metal awnings. Between them is a two-story high opening with sliding doors. Above the door on the south side of the façade is a steel frame, multi-light industrial style window with a hopper light in the middle section. There is a small drop roof addition on the east end of the building. There is a secondary entrance on the north side of the building, facing E. 6th Street. There is no associated landscaping with this property.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northwest elevation, view southeast.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1948 Building Permit
George M Hansen
9382 Hunting Circle
Villa Park, CA 92861
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3001 5/5/2026
531 Terminal Way
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 531 Terminal Way
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

Building Permit #1004, dated September 8, 1948, was issued for a two-room commercial garage. The owner was S.L. Johnson.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1948 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. S-J Auto Star occupied this property in 1954, per the 1954 city directory. This property does not appear on the 1949 Sanborn Map. No specific persons, such as original owner S.L. Johnson, associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 531 Terminal Way ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
1954 city directory; Sanborn Fire Insurance maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3002 5/5/2026
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP37 Highway/trail
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Tracks crossing 4th Street, view east.
1 Santa Ana 92701
1880s
Burlington Northern Santa Fe RR
2650 Lou Menk Drive
Fort Worth, TX 76131
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3003 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3004 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3005 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3006 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3007 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3008 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3009 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3010 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3011 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3012 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3013 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3014 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3015 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3016 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3017 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3018 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3019 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3020 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3021 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3022 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3023 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3024 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3025 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3026 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3027 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3028 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3029 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3030 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3031 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3032 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3033 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3034 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3035 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3036 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3037 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3038 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3039 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3040 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3041 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3042 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3043 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3044 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3045 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3046 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3047 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3048 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3049 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3050 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3051 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3052 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3053 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3054 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3055 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3056 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3057 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3058 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3059 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3060 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3061 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3062 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3063 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3064 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3065 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3066 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3067 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3068 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3069 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3070 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3071 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3072 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3073 5/5/2026
Attachment C
ASR
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3074 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3075 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3076 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3077 5/5/2026
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
i
Table of Contents
Page
List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ ii List of Abbreviated Terms ........................................................................................................................... iii Summary of Findings ............................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2 Highway Project Location and Description ...................................................... 5 Chapter 3 Sources Consulted .............................................................................................. 6

3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 6

3.2 Cultural Resources Literature and Records Search ............................................................. 6

3.3 Summary of Native American Consultation ....................................................................... 7 Chapter 4 Background ....................................................................................................... 11

4.1 Physical Environment ....................................................................................................... 11

4.2 Cultural Setting ................................................................................................................. 11

4.2.1 Ethnography .................................................................................................. 11

4.2.2 Prehistory ...................................................................................................... 11

4.2.3 History ........................................................................................................... 12 Chapter 5 Field Methods .................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 6 Study Findings and Conclusions ..................................................................... 17 Chapter 7 References Cited ............................................................................................... 18 Appendix A Maps
Survey Coverage Map
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3078 5/5/2026
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
ii
List of Tables
Page
Table 1 Previously Recorded Cultural Resource Sites within the APE ........................................... 8 Table 2 Summary of Native American Contacts ............................................................................. 9 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3079 5/5/2026
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
iii
List of Abbreviated Terms
amsl above mean sea level
APE area of potential effects
ASR archaeological survey report
B.P. before present
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CHL California Historical Landmarks
CHRIS California Historic Resources Inventory System
CRHR California Register of Historical Resources
Department California Department of Transportation
EIR/EIS environmental impact report/environmental impact statement HPSR Historic Property Survey Report
HRER Historic Resources Evaluation Report
HRI Historic Resources Inventory
MLD Most Likely Descendent
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
NRHP National Register of Historic Places
PA Programmatic Agreement
PHI Points of Historical Interest
PQS Professionally Qualified Staff
PSR Project Study Report
SCCIC South Central Coastal Information Center
USGS U.S. Geological Survey
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3080 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3081 5/5/2026
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
1 Summary of Findings
This archaeological survey report (ASR) was prepared on behalf of the City of Santa Ana and the California Department of Transportation (Department), District 12, for the Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project (proposed project). The proposed project is located in Orange County, in the City of Santa Ana. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at‐ grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; improve emergency response times; and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard. The Area of Potential Effects (APE) is located on the Orange and Tustin U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5‐minute topographic maps (see Appendix A), in unsectioned portions of the former Rancho de Santa Ana. Elevations within the project site range from approximately 131 to 141 feet above mean sea level (amsl).

A literature and records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton on July 19, 2011. The search included a review of all recorded archaeological sites within a one‐mile radius of the project site as well as the cultural resource reports on file. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) was contacted by ICF regarding the project on August 8, 2011. A response from the commission on August 10, 2011, indicated that no sites within the project area have been designated as sacred lands, according to a search of the Sacred Lands File. The NAHC also provided a list of Native American groups and individuals who might have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. Letters and maps describing the proposed project and indicating the APE for the proposed project were sent to these 15 Native American representatives on September 2, 2011. No replies have been received. Phone calls will be made to these Native American contacts 30 days after the mailing date of the letters.

A Phase I archaeological survey of the APE was undertaken on September 11, 2011 by Mark C.

Robinson, RPA. Mr. Robinson holds an M.S. degree in anthropology from University of Oregon (1998) and has 17 years of experience in southern California archaeology. Mr. Robinson meets the Professionally Qualified Staff (PQS) standards for Principal Investigator, Prehistoric Archaeology.

The APE for the proposed project was observed to be completely developed with commercial and industrial buildings, residential properties, lawn, and paving. No areas of open, undisturbed land were identified. The few parcels in the APE not occupied by building, pavement, or landscaping were graveled and had been previously disturbed. No archaeological resources were observed during the survey of the APE.

It is the Department’s policy to avoid cultural resources whenever possible. Further investigations may be needed if unanticipated cultural sites are encountered that cannot be avoided by the project. If cultural materials are discovered during construction, all earth‐ moving activity within and around the immediate discovery area will be diverted until a qualified archaeologist can assess the nature and significance of the find. If changes are made EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3082 5/5/2026
Summary of Findings
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
2 to the proposed project, an additional archaeological survey would be required to include areas not previously surveyed.

At this time, the person who discovered the remains will contact the District 12 Environmental Branch so that they may work with the MLD on the respectful treatment and disposition of the remains. Further provisions of PRC 5097.98 are to be followed as applicable.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3083 5/5/2026
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
3 Chapter 1 Introduction
The City of Santa Ana, in coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Department), is proposing to grade separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at‐grade railroad crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California (see Historic Property Survey Report [HPSR] Attachment A, Figures 1 and 2). The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at‐grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the OCTA Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; improve emergency response times; and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard. The project proposes to relocate Santa Ana Boulevard approximately 30 feet south of its existing alignment, to construct a utility corridor on the north side of the roadway, and to maintain the existing lane configuration of three lanes in each direction for the entire length of the project. The proposed project would include the construction of an underpass bridge (i.e., roadway going under the railroad tracks) and retaining walls, installation of paving, curbs, gutters, medians, sidewalks, streetlights, landscape and irrigation features, drainage facilities, and the relocation of utilities.

The APE was established as the limits of proposed construction, including the limits of the current and proposed right‐of‐way, temporary construction easements plus a sufficient buffer to allow heavy equipment to maneuver, and staging areas. The height of the vertical APE is the existing grade level. The maximum depth of the vertical APE would be approximately 25 feet for excavation of the underpass structure. Six‐foot diameter cast‐in‐drilled‐hole (CIDH) pile extensions would be used at the bents and driven steel HP piles (HP 14x89) would be used at the abutments. The proposed pile lengths are anticipated to be 55 feet and 70 feet at the bents and the abutments, respectively. The APE is located on the Orange and Tustin U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5‐minute topographic maps (see Appendix A), in unsectioned portions of the former Rancho de Santa Ana. Elevations within the project site range from approximately 131 to 141 feet above mean sea level (amsl).

This archaeological survey report (ASR) has been prepared in order to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. The ASR is used to document identification and recordation efforts for prehistoric and historical archaeological resources.

This ASR implements the revised regulations (amendments effective August 5, 2004) of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation for the Protection of Historic Properties (36 CFR 800).

It was prepared in conformance with the format set forth in Caltrans’ Standard Environmental Reference Environmental Handbook, Volume 2, Chapter 5, Prehistoric Archaeological Resources (August 2009), and Chapter 6, Historical Archaeological Resources (June 2009), as well Exhibit

5.1 (June 2009) and Exhibit 6.2 (June 2009).

A Phase I cultural resources survey of the APE for the proposed project was performed in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The APE was surveyed on September 11, 2011, by Mark C. Robinson, RPA. Mr. Robinson holds an M.S. degree in anthropology from University of Oregon (1998) and has 17 years of experience in southern EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3084 5/5/2026
Chapter 1. Introduction
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
4 California archaeology. Mr. Robinson meets the Professionally Qualified Staff (PQS) standards for Principal Investigator, Prehistoric Archaeology.

Prior to the field investigations a literature and records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton on July 19, 2011. The search included a review of all recorded archaeological sites within a one‐mile radius of the project site as well as the cultural resource reports on file. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) was contacted by ICF regarding the project on August 8, 2011. A response from the commission on August 10, 2011, indicated that no sites within the project area have been designated as sacred lands, according to a search of the Sacred Lands File. The NAHC also provided a list of Native American groups and individuals who might have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. Letters and maps describing the proposed project and indicating the proposed project APE were sent to these 15 Native American representatives on September 2, 2011. No replies have been received. Phone calls will be made to these Native American contacts 30 days after the mailing date of the letters.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3085 5/5/2026
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
5 Chapter 2 Highway Project Location and
Description
The City of Santa Ana, in coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Department), is proposing to grade separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at‐grade railroad crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California (see Historic Property Survey Report [HPSR] Attachment A, Figures 1 and 2).

Currently, 66 trains cross Santa Ana Boulevard at this location on weekdays. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at‐grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the OCTA Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; improve emergency response times; and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard.

The proposed project improvements extend along Santa Ana Boulevard from approximately Santiago Street at the west end to the west side of the Interstate 5 (I‐5) southbound off‐ramp intersection with Santa Ana Boulevard. As part of the grade separation the proposed project includes minor improvements to the Santa Ana Boulevard/Santiago Street intersection; terminating Logan Street north of Santa Ana Boulevard by constructing a cul‐de‐sac; and improvements to Fuller Street, both north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard.

The project proposes to relocate Santa Ana Boulevard approximately 30 feet south of its existing alignment, to construct a utility corridor on the north side of the roadway, and to maintain the existing lane configuration of three (3) lanes in each direction for the entire length of the project.

The proposed project would include the construction of an underpass bridge (i.e., roadway going under the railroad tracks) and retaining walls, installation of paving, curbs, gutters, medians, sidewalks, streetlights, landscape and irrigation features, drainage facilities, and the relocation of utilities. During construction the project proposes to construct a temporary two track shoofly railroad alignment for the purpose of constructing the underpass structure while maintaining railroad service, which is to be constructed beginning just south of the existing Metrolink crossing of I‐5 and terminating south of the Santa Ana Transportation Center near 4th Street. This shoofly alignment would be located east of the existing railroad alignment. The project also proposes to construct a two‐lane detour road south of Santa Ana Boulevard, which would be used by traffic during the construction of the underpass bridge and its approaches.

The project also proposes to use Fruit Street as a detour route during the final phase of construction. New right‐of‐way, including both permanent acquisition and temporary easements, would be needed for the construction of the shoofly and detour road.

Construction staging areas for the proposed project would potentially be located on the following properties: APNs 398‐093‐13, 398‐092‐12, and 398‐207‐01. The disposal site for the EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3086 5/5/2026
Chapter 2. Highway Project Location and Description
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
6 proposed project, if needed, would be selected by the contractor. Any environmental clearances related to the disposal site will be obtained by the contractor prior to construction.

The proposed project is included in the 2008 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and 2011 cost constrained Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) (federal approval date of December 14, 2010) as project ID ORA082610. The project as proposed is consistent with the 2011 FTIP description.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3087 5/5/2026
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
7 Chapter 3 Sources Consulted

3.1 Introduction
A records search, Native American consultation, and a review of the Sacred Lands files maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and other contacts were conducted for the proposed project. The Departments’ Historic Highway Bridge Inventory was also consulted. These efforts are described below.

3.2 Cultural Resources Literature and Records Search
Prior to the archaeological field investigation, a literature and records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton on July 19, 2011. The search included a review of the following sources:
 All available cultural resource survey and site records recorded at the South Central Coastal Information Center, a unit of the California Historic Resources Inventory System (CHRIS);  The National Register of Historic Places;
 California Register of Historical Resources;
 California Inventory of Historic Resources;
 California Historical Landmarks (State of California 1996);  California Points of Historical Interest (State of California 1992); and  Caltrans Historic Highway Bridge Inventory.

The search included a review of all recorded archaeological sites within a one‐mile radius of the project site as well as a review of the on‐file cultural resource reports. In addition, records from California Points of Historical Interest (PHI), California Historical Landmarks (CHL), the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), and the California State Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) were reviewed.

The record search revealed that 60 cultural resource surveys have been conducted within a one‐mile radius of the project APE. Of these surveys, two encompassed small parts of the project APE.

Record search results indicated that a total of 72 cultural resources had been previously recorded within the one‐mile record search radius. Four built environment resources have been previously recorded within the APE (see Table 1); no prehistoric or historical archaeological sites or isolated artifacts have been identified within the project APE.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3088 5/5/2026
Chapter 3. Sources Consulted
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
8 Table 1. Previously Recorded Cultural Resource Sites within the APE Primary Number Trinomial Description
30-176663 None Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad segment (formerly the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe)
30-176664 None Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad segment (formerly the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe)
30-176801 None 1111 East Fruit Street, Buildings #1, #2 30-176802 None Orange County Maintenance Yard
1102 East Fruit Street, Buildings #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, ,#8, #9 An additional 59 built environment resources have been previously recorded within the APE.

Nine historical archaeological sites, all vacant lots where older homes were removed, also have been previously recorded within a one‐mile radius of the APE; none are in proximity to the APE.

Currently, there are four NRHP/CRHR, listings within a one‐mile radius of the project APE, all built environment resources. One PHI, also one of these built environment resources, is within the one‐mile radius of the project APE. No CHL, NRHP, or HRI listings are within a one‐mile radius of the project APE. None of these resources are within the APE.

3.3 Summary of Native American Consultation
The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) was contacted by ICF International regarding the project on August 8, 2011. A response from the commission on August 10, 2011, indicated that no sites within the project area have been designated as sacred lands, according to a search of the Sacred Lands File. The NAHC also provided a list of 15 Native American groups and individuals who might have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area (see HPSR Attachment F).

Letters and maps describing the proposed project and indicating the APE for the proposed project were sent to these 15 Native American representatives on September 2, 2011. The names and affiliation of these groups and individuals are listed on Table 1 below. No replies have been received. A first round of telephone contact calls was made to these Native American contacts or their representatives on October 28, 2011, with the results provided in Table 1 below. The Native American consultation information is included as Attachment D of the HPSR.

Table 2. Summary of Native American Contacts
Native American
Group/Individual
Date of First
Contact: Letter
Dates of
Replies
Date of Second
Contact: Phone Summary of Conversation
Bernie Acuna, GabrielinoTongva Tribe
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Left a message for Beverly Garcia, who represents the tribe for Ms.

Acuna, and requested that she
return the all if she has any
comments on the project.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3089 5/5/2026
Chapter 3. Sources Consulted
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
9 Cindi Alvitre,
Chairwoman, Ti’at
Society
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Attempted to phone Ms. Alvitre,
telephone not in service.

David Belardes,
Chairperson, Juaneno
Band of Mission Indians,
Acjachemen Nation
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Mr. Belardes is represented by Ms.

Joyce Perry, see below.

Linda Candelaria,
Chairwoman, GabrielinoTongva Tribe
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Ms. Candelaria is represented by Ms. Beverly Garcia, see above.

Alfred Cruz, Cultural
Resources Coordinator,
Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Left a message requesting that Mr.

Cruz return the phone call if he has
any comments on the project.

Robert F. Dorame, Tribal
Chair/Cultural, Gabrielino
Tongva Indians of
California Tribal Council
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Left a message requesting that Mr.

Dorame return the phone call if he
has any comments on the project.

Sam Dunlap,
Chairperson, Gabrielino
Tongva Nation
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Left a message requesting that Mr.

Dunlap return the phone call if he
has any comments on the project.

Anita Espinoza, Juaneno
Band of Mission Indians
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Left a message requesting that Ms.

Espinoza return the phone call if
she has any comments on the
project.

Sonia Johnston, Tribal
Chairperson, Juaneno
Band of Mission Indians
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Ms. Johnston is represented by Mr.

Alfred Cruz, see above.

Anthony Morales,
Chairperson,
Gabrielino/Tongva Band
of Mission Indians
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Mr. Morales stated that as with all trenching and excavation, it was
necessary to be vigilant. Mr.

Morales had no other concerns or
requests.

Joyce Perry,
Representing Tribal
Chairperson, Juaneno
Band of Mission Indians,
Acjachmen Nation
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Left a message requesting that Ms.

Perry return the phone call if she
has any comments on the project.

Anthony Rivera,
Chairman, Juaneno Band
of Mission Indians,
Acjachemen Nation
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Mr. Rivera is represented by Ms.

Joyce Perry, see above.

Rebecca Robles, United
Coalition to Protect
Panhe
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Left a message requesting that Ms.

Robles return the phone call if she
has any comments on the project.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3090 5/5/2026
Chapter 3. Sources Consulted
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
10 Tommy John Rosas,
Tribal Administrator,
Tongva Ancestral
Territorial Tribal Nation
09/02/11 None None Mr. Rosas is available only by email.

Adolph “Bud” Sepulveda,
Vice Chairperson,
Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Mr. Sepulveda is represented by
Mr. Alfred Cruz, see above.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3091 5/5/2026
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
11 Chapter 4 Background

4.1 Physical Environment
The project area is located on the Orange County plain, a broad, level expanse of land adjacent to the Pacific coast. Prior to historical settlement of the area, the plain was characterized by extensive inland prairies and coastal lagoons. Marshlands fed by fresh or salt water also once covered many portions of the area. The Orange County plain is traversed by several watercourses, most notably the Santa Ana river. The project area is very flat, with elevations ranging from approximately 131 feet to 141 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The entire surface area of the project APE has been modified by urban development and landscaping.

4.2 Cultural Setting

4.2.1 Ethnography
The project area lies within the territory of the Gabrielino Native American people (Bean and Smith 1978). The Gabrielino are characterized as one of the most complex societies in native southern California, second perhaps only to the Chumash, their coastal neighbors to the northwest. This complexity derives from their overall economic, ritual, and social organization (Bean and Smith 1978; Kroeber 1925).

The Gabrielino, a Uto‐Aztecan (or Shoshonean) group, may have entered the Los Angeles Basin as recently as 1500 B.P. In early protohistoric times, the Gabrielino occupied a large territory including the entire San Fernando Valley and Los Angeles Basin. This region encompasses the coast from Malibu to Aliso Creek, parts of the Santa Monica Mountains, the San Fernando Valley, the San Gabriel Valley, the San Bernardino Valley, the northern parts of the Santa Ana Mountains, and much of the middle to the lower Santa Ana River. They also occupied the islands of Santa Catalina, San Clemente, and San Nicolas. Within this large territory were more than 50 residential communities with populations ranging from 50 to 150 individuals. The Gabrielino had access to a broad and diverse resource base. This wealth of resources, coupled with an effective subsistence technology, well developed trade network, and ritual system, resulted in a society that was among one of the most materially wealthy and culturally sophisticated cultural groups in California at the time of contact (McCawley 1996).

4.2.2 Prehistory
The prehistoric occupation of southern California is divided chronologically into four temporal phases, or horizons (Moratto 1984). Horizon I, or the Early Man Horizon, began at the first appearance of people in the region approximately 12,000 years ago and continued until approximately 5000 B.C. Although little is known about these people, it is assumed that they were semi‐nomadic and subsisted primarily on game.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3092 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Background
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
12 Horizon II, also known as the Millingstone Horizon or Encinitas Tradition, began around 5000 B.C. and continued until approximately 1500 B.C. The Millingstone Horizon is characterized by widespread use of milling stones (manos and metates), core tools, and few projectile points or bone and shell artifacts. This horizon appears to represent a diversification of subsistence activities and a more sedentary settlement pattern. Archaeological evidence suggests that hunting became less important and that reliance on collecting shellfish and vegetal resources increased (Moratto 1984).

Horizon III, the Intermediate Horizon or Campbell Tradition, began around 1500 B.C. and continued until approximately A.D. 600–800. Horizon III is defined by a shift from the use of milling stones to an increased use of mortars and pestles, indicating a greater reliance on acorns as a food source. Projectile points become more abundant and, together with faunal remains, they indicate an increased use of both land and sea mammals (Moratto 1984).

Horizon IV, the Late Horizon, which began around A.D. 600–800 and terminated with the arrival of Europeans, is characterized by dense populations; diversified hunting and gathering subsistence strategies, including intensive fishing and sea mammal hunting; extensive trade networks; use of the bow and arrow; and a general cultural elaboration (Moratto 1984).

4.2.3 History

4.2.3.1 Mission Period
European settlement of California began in 1769 at San Diego. Mission San Gabriel was established in the Los Angeles basin in 1771, San Juan Capistrano in 1775, and the Los Angeles pueblo was established as a civilian settlement on September 4, 1781. The goal of the mission system was to convert the native peoples to Catholicism, gain control of the native population, and establish self‐sufficient communities.

4.2.3.2 Mexican Period
In 1821, Mexico won independence from Spain and subsequently became a republic. In 1833, the Mexican government secularized the missions and began to redistribute mission land holdings. The Mexican government also made a large number of land grants to its citizens in an effort to promote settlement in California and to discourage claims on the territory by the United States and Russia. During the period between 1833 and 1846 approximately 700 land grants were conferred, twenty of which were wholly or partially within the boundaries of Orange County.

The project area occurs within the boundaries of the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana. In 1810, this land grant was made under Spanish rule to Bernardo Yorba when his father‐in‐law Juan Pablo Grijalva died prior to the grant being approved. Members of the Yorba family reconfirmed title to the 63,414‐acre property in 1839.

4.2.3.3 American Period
In 1848, at the end of the war between Mexico and the United States, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed, giving control of California to the United States. The acquisition of EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3093 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Background
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
13 California by the United States and the discovery of gold in 1849 drew many Euro‐Americans into California. California developed rapidly and was admitted to the Union in 1850. However, the great population influx was limited primarily to central California, San Francisco, and the Gold Rush region of the Sierra Nevada. Southern California grew slowly during this time.

Although the Yorba family claim to its ranch was upheld again by the U.S. Land Commission (1855), the number and conflicting nature of claims by heirs as well as other non‐family claimants led to the partition of the rancho in 1866 (Cleland 1962). Among the non‐family claimants was Jacob Ross, Sr. Three years later, Ross sold 74 acres of the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana to Kentuckian William D. Spurgeon, who then founded the City of Santa Ana.

Orange County
California counties were delineated in 1850. The 500 residents located in the Santa Ana Valley of what is now known as Orange County, were included at the time within the boundaries of Los Angeles County. In 1889, a proposal was approved for the creation of Orange County.

The mild southern California weather made Orange County an ideal place to produce oranges.

In 1875, the first commercial grove of Valencia oranges in Southern California were planted in Fullerton. Orange County became an official county in 1889; the namesake was derived from the numerous orchards that occupied the area. During the 1930s, Orange County was producing a sixth of the nation’s Valencia orange crop. Oranges covered only 20,000 acres by the 1960s, with less than a dozen packing houses remaining. The Valencia orange continued to be Orange County’s most profitable product until 1966, when the number of orchards was greatly reduced due to development. Walnuts also proved to be very profitable for the county.

During the 1920s through the 1960s the County was producing a large portion of the world’s crop of soft‐shelled walnuts (Orange County).

In addition to agriculture, the petroleum oil production and processing industry was a major factor in the development of Orange County. The first producing oil well in the County was drilled in Brea in 1882; however, these early oil production efforts in the Brea area were overshadowed by the major strikes at Placentia in 1919 and at Huntington Beach in 1920. By the 1960s, long after urban development had supplanted nearly all agricultural acreage in the County, oil production remained a prominent visual feature on the landscape (Orange County).

Santa Ana
The City of Santa Ana was founded by William H. Spurgeon in 1869. The area Spurgeon chose for the town site was the covered with tall stands of yellow mustard and was bounded on the south by First Street, on the west by Broadway (formerly West Street), on the north by Seventh Street, and on the east by Spurgeon Street (Goddard and Allen 1968). Spurgeon operated the town’s general store and its first post office and served as postmaster for the Santa Ana Valley area residents. He induced Wells Fargo into providing stage coach service to the fledgling community by cutting a three‐mile road to the north where it approached the so‐called “Rodriguez Crossing” of the Santa Ana River (Swanner 1953). Spurgeon seems to have worked tirelessly to promote the success of Santa Ana, spearheading the incorporation movement and efforts to bring railroad service to the community.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3094 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Background
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
14 In 1877, J.H. Fruit, James McFadden and Spurgeon organized a company known as the Western Development Company in order to raise the funds needed to encourage the Southern Pacific Railroad to extend its line to Santa Ana from Anaheim. The Atchison Topeka Santa Fe Railroad reached Santa Ana by 1887. Two train depots were once located in the project area; the last one standing was demolished to accommodate the larger depot built in 1985 that is sited on the west side of the tracks in the APE.

The train depot location, just north of Fruit Street, was used as an opportunity to create a new business district and sell land at a larger profit margin than had been the case previously in developing Santa Ana. This subdivision is the present location of the project area. The depot area encompassed some 160 acres northeast of the original town site. It was platted as commercial property with 25‐foot street frontages, streets were laid out parallel with, or at right angles to, the Southern Pacific track, thus at an angle to all the other streets in town. The Western Development Company was unsuccessful in its efforts to entice businesses to relocate from the original town site to the depot tract. Consequently, the land was re‐subdivided for residential, and eventually, industrial purposes. Due to its physical separation from the earlier business core and the proximity to the city’s railroad corridors, the subdivision attracted working class families and was one of the few areas in the city where real estate agents would sell property to Mexican Americans (Swanner 1953). By the late nineteenth century, this became the genesis of the Logan Barrio.

Logan Barrio
Most of the properties were owner‐occupied in the Logan Barrio area, which was first settled at the turn of the century. City directories, Sanborn Maps and US Census records show that in many cases, extended family members shared the residences or built small auxiliary dwellings on individual parcels. The 1920 US Census records for Lincoln Avenue and Logan Street show that most men living in the neighborhood worked as general laborers. Residents of this area also may have been employed by the warehouses to the south, as fruit packers, or as pickers in the many citrus farms in the immediate area.

Lincoln Avenue, located within the project area, was the eastern boundary of the Logan Barrio.

The north boundary may have been E. Washington Street. When the Sanborn Maps for Santa Ana were published in 1906, the south end of Lincoln Avenue ended at Depot Street, just a few blocks from the Santa Fe and Southern Pacific depots. “C” Street, later Santiago Street, and the lumber yards and mills of J.M. Griffith Company provided the western boundary of the Logan Barrio. This was primarily a residential neighborhood until the 1950s. In the 1950s, many single‐family homes were demolished, and parcels, especially along Lincoln Avenue, were merged into large lots occupied by small businesses and industrial facilities.

In the post‐World War II era, most of the undeveloped parcels of the Logan Barrio were occupied. Several businesses were located at the intersection of Stafford and Logan Streets, including stores and a bakery. Today, most properties along Lincoln Avenue are industrial; although, some residential properties still remain. Logan Street remains primarily residential, EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3095 5/5/2026
Chapter 4. Background
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
15 although many of the original dwellings from the 1920s have been demolished and replaced with contemporary single‐family homes.

City Development
The incorporation of the City of Santa Ana was likely related to lobbying efforts on behalf of establishing a separate county jurisdiction in which Santa Ana would serve as the county seat, and efforts to encourage the Santa Fe Railroad to establish a depot in Santa Ana (1887‐1888).

When the City of Santa Ana incorporated in June 1886, it boasted a population of 2,000.

Spurgeon became its first mayor (Goddard and Allen 1968).

The 1910s and early 1920s period was one of major new development in and bordering Santa Ana. In 1912, the voters approved a $1.2 million road improvements bond that led to the paving and improvement of key “inter‐city roads” in Orange County. Three years later more than 108 miles of road work had been completed. By the end of the decade, and continuing into the 1920s, aggressive promotional efforts on the part of the County Board of Supervisors and the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce brought new businesses and a flood of new homeowners into the area (Goddard and Allen 1968).

At the opening of the 1940s, and with a population of only 32,000, Santa Ana continued to be chiefly an agricultural community, serving also as a regional government and business center. It was the locus, almost exclusively, for small‐scale food processing and furniture manufacturing businesses of local and regional scope.

In the early 1940s, most Santa Ana area industrial workers had been commuters to Los Angeles and Long Beach; however, by the 1960s many workers found employment in Orange County, due chiefly to the dramatic expansion of technology‐based manufacturing that the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce and other boosters helped usher in. Historian Pamela Hallan‐Gibson writes that “…a human tsunami swept over Santa Ana and Orange County in the 1950s, taking much of the old culture with it.” This was most notably reflected in the transformation of the landscape “as farmland gave way to urban development (Hallan‐Gibson 2002).” The population figures starkly convey this change. In 1940, there were 130,760 inhabitants in the county. By 1960, the Orange County population had grown to approximately 704,000 (Hallan‐Gibson 2002).”
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3096 5/5/2026
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
16 Chapter 5 Field Methods
A survey of the APE was undertaken on September 11, 2011 by Mark C. Robinson, RPA.

Mr. Robinson holds an M.S. degree in anthropology from University of Oregon (1998) and has 17 years of experience in southern California archaeology. Mr. Robinson meets the Professionally Qualified Staff (PQS) standards for Principal Investigator, Prehistoric Archaeology.

The project APE was observed to be completely developed with commercial and industrial buildings, residential properties, lawn, and paving (see Appendix A: Survey Coverage Map).

No areas of open, undisturbed land were identified. The few parcels in the APE not occupied by building, pavement or landscaping were graveled and had been previously disturbed.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3097 5/5/2026
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
17 Chapter 6 Study Findings and Conclusions
No archaeological resources have been previously recorded within the APE, and no new cultural resources were observed within the APE for the proposed project during this investigation.

Portions of the APE disturbed by previous railroad, road, and building construction are unlikely to preserve intact buried archaeological deposits, because earthmoving for this previous construction was extensive. Disturbance on the level areas of the APE is difficult to determine but extended at least four or five feet below the ground surface. In the project vicinity, prehistoric sites are usually located adjacent to water sources or attractive resources. T he setting of the APE on an open area with no adjacent resources, such as a dependable water source or bedrock outcrops, indicates that it is unlikely to encompass buried cultural resources at shallow depths. Given the geologic setting of the APE and the level of previous disturbance, the potential to encounter buried prehistoric resources within the project APE is considered to be low.

The project APE encompasses part of one of the older neighborhoods in Santa Ana, originally developed in the late Nineteenth Century. Portions of the APE may preserve early historical archaeological resources such as trash pits or privy pits. However, the direct construction area of the APE has been disturbed by the construction of streets and the replacement of homes by small business and industrial buildings during later development, which may have disturbed or removed historical archaeological resources. Therefore, the potential to encounter intact historic‐period archaeological resources within the project APE is considered to be low.

It is the Department’s policy to avoid cultural resources whenever possible. Further investigations may be needed if unanticipated cultural sites are encountered that cannot be avoided by the project. If cultural materials are discovered during construction, all earth‐ moving activity within and around the immediate discovery area will be diverted until a qualified archaeologist can assess the nature and significance of the find. If changes are made to the proposed project, an additional archaeological survey would be required to include areas not previously surveyed.

If human remains are discovered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that further disturbances and activities shall cease in any area or nearby area suspected to overlie remains, and the county coroner contacted. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, if the remains are thought to be Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC, who will then notify the Most Likely Descendent (MLD). At this time, the person who discovered the remains will contact Caltrans District 12, Environmental Division, Cultural Studies Branch, so that they may work with the MLD on the respectful treatment and disposition of the remains. Further provisions of PRC 5097.98 are to be followed as applicable.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3098 5/5/2026
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
18 Chapter 7 References Cited
Bean, L. J., and C. R. Smith
1978 Gabrielino. In Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 8, California, R. F. Heizer (ed.), pp. 538–549. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.

Cleland, Robert Glass
1962 The Irvine Ranch. San Marino, CA: Huntington Library.

Goddard, Francelia B. and Allen W.
1968 In A Hundred Years of Yesterdays: A Centennial History of the People of Orange County and Their Communities. Available online at:
www.santaanahistory.com/local_history.html
Hallan‐Gibson, Pamela
2002 Orange County: The Golden Promise – An Illustrated History. Sun Valley, CA:

American Historical Press.

Kroeber, Alfred
1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Bulletin 78, American Bureau of Ethnology. Reprinted in 1976. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

McCawley, W.
1996 The First Angelinos. Malki Museum Press/Ballena Press Cooperative Publications.

Moratto, Michael J.
1984 California Archaeology. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Orange County 2011
“A Brief History of Orange County” County Clerk’s Office online at:
http://www.ocsd.org/vgnfiles/ocgove/Clerk‐Recorder/DOC
Swanner, Charles D.
1953 Santa Ana: A Narrative of Yesterday, 1870‐1910. Claremont, CA: Saunders Press
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3099 5/5/2026
Appendix A Maps
Survey Coverage Map
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3100 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3101 5/5/2026
Project Location
Figure 4
Survey Coverage Map
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
K:\Irvine\GIS\Projects\AECOM\00452_11\mapdoc\Cultural\Fig04_area_surveyed.mxd SM (09-14-11) Source: USGS 7.5' Quad, CA:

Anaheim, Orange,
Newport Beach, & Tustin
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
District: 12
County: Orange
Route: Santa Ana Boulevard
Federal Project No.: STPL 5063(136)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3102 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3103 5/5/2026
Attachment D
NAHC and Native American Correspondence
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3104 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3105 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3106 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3107 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3108 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3109 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3110 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3111 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3112 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3113 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3114 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3115 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3116 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3117 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3118 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3119 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3120 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3121 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3122 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3123 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3124 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3125 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3126 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3127 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3128 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3129 5/5/2026
Attachment E
Interested Parties
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3130 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3131 5/5/2026
811 West 7th Street, Suite 800  Los Angeles, CA 90017  tel. 213.627.5376  fax 213.627.6853 www.icfi.com
August 29, 2011
Re: Historic and Cultural Resources Documentation for the Santa Ana Grade Separation, City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California.

To ____________:

The City of Santa Ana, in coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Department), is proposing to grade separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at-grade railroad crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at-grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the OCTA Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation, including depressing the profile of Santa Ana Boulevard under the adjacent Metrolink tracks to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; improve emergency response times; and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard. The proposed project improvements extend along Santa Ana Boulevard from approximately Santiago Street at the west end to the west side of the Interstate 5 (I-5) southbound offramp intersection with Santa Ana Boulevard. As part of the grade separation the proposed project includes: minor improvements to the Santa Ana Boulevard/Santiago Street intersection; terminating Logan Street north of Santa Ana Boulevard by constructing a cul-de-sac; and improvements to Fuller Street, both north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard. The project proposes to relocate Santa Ana Boulevard approximately 30 feet south of its existing alignment, to construct a utility corridor on the north side of the roadway, and to maintain the existing lane configuration of three (3) lanes in each direction for the entire length of the project. The proposed project will include the construction of an underpass bridge and retaining walls, installation of paving, curbs, gutters, medians, sidewalks, streetlights, landscape and irrigation features, drainage facilities, and the relocation of utilities.

As part of our research, ICF is contacting local historical organizations, museums, and city planning departments to help identify any historic buildings, districts, sites, objects, or archaeological sites of importance within the project area. We are conducting research on the properties within the Project area to determine their archaeological, architectural, and historical importance. Our assessments will be based on the criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historical Resources. Any information you can provide will help assure that these properties will be considered as a part of the environmental process.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the proposed project, please feel free to contact Elizabeth Hilton at (213) 627-5376 or by email at [email protected]. We look forward to your response.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Hilton
Architectural Historian, ICF International
Enclosure: Map of project area.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3132 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3133 5/5/2026
5 405
5 5
405
55 91
261
73 57
72 22
133
90 133
90 261
72 91
261
57 22
Anaheim
Santa Ana
Irvine
Orange
Costa Mesa
Garden Grove
Fullerton
Tustin
Fountain Valley
Newport Beach
Westminster
Tustin Foothills
Placentia
Villa Park Villa Park
Figure 1
Regional Vicinity Map
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
Source: ESRI StreetMap
North America (2008)
0 0.5 1 2
Miles
San Bernardino
Riverside
Imperial San Diego
Orange
Los Angeles
Kern
P a c i f i c
O c e a n
K:\Irvine\GIS\Projects\AECOM\00452_11\mapdoc\Fig01_Regional_Vicinity.mxd SM, NB (09-19-11) Project Site
District: 12
County: Orange
Route: Santa Ana Boulevard
Federal Project No.: Federal Project Number: STPL 5063(136) EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3134 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3135 5/5/2026
Attachment F
SHPO Correspondence
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3136 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3137 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3138 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3139 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3140 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3141 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3142 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3143 5/5/2026
ARNOLD SCHW/1.RZENEGGER. Governor
~ "' " ,-,. .
:" ..
! ..: ,
,
",',..-
,
S:TATt OF CALJ,FORNIA -THE RESOURCES AGENCY
=--

OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
P.o BOX 942896
SACRAMENTO, CA 94296-0001
(916) 653-6624 Fax. (916) 653-9824
[email protected]
www.ohp.parks.ca.gov
December 27, 2004
Reply to: FHWAO41103A
Smita Deshpande
Chief, Environmental Planning Branch C
California Department of Transportation, District 12
3337 Michelson Drive, Suite 380
Irvine, CA 92612-8894
RE: Determinations of Eligibility and Finding of Effect for the Santa Ana Art Wall Project, Orange County, California EA 633701
Dear Ms. Deshpande,
I have received your letter dated December 14,2004, regarding the proposed Santa Ana Art Wall Project. Consultation for this undertaking is conducted pursuant to the Programmatic Agreement among the Federal Highway Administration, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the California State Historic Preservation Officer, and the California Department of Transportation Regarding Compliance with Section i 06 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as it Pertains to the Administration of the Federal-aid Highway Program in California (PA).

You have submitted a Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR) documenting your efforts to identify historic properties located within the project's area of potential effects (APE). You state that two architectural properties were identified within the APE that required formal evaluation. The first property is located at 1102 E. Fruit Street (SAA W #1) and consists of seven buildings associated with Orange County's road maintenance department. The second property is located at 1111 E. Fruit Street (SAA W #2) and consists of two buildings associated with the General Petroleum Corporation of California. You have recommended that the various buildings and structures that comprise 1102 E. Fruit Street (SAA W #1) are eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion A and C, and that the property identified as 1111 E. Fruit Street (SAA W #2) is not eligible for the NRHP. Your reason for determining SAA W # 1 eligible is its high level of integrity , its relative scarcity among other similar highway maintenance facilities in or near Orange CoUnty , and its utilitarian industrial architecture associated with roads and highway mai.'1tenance h'1 Orange Cou.'1ty since t.~e 1920s I have reviewed the initial and supplemental documentation regarding the Santa Ana Art Wall Project and concur with your finding that the property located at 1102 E. Fruit Street (SAA W #1) is eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A and C and that the property located at 1111 E. Fruit Street (SAA W #2) is not eligible for the NRHP .

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3144 5/5/2026

Page 2 of 2 ends

You recommend that a finding of no historic properties be applied to this undertaking, since the property identified as SAA W #1 is located within the "indirect APE," and that the project, which involves the construction of a 16'-0" high concrete wall, 517 feet long within the Orange County Transit Authority right of way, will not alter any of the characteristics that define the property .This finding is based on the premise that the proposed Art Wall lies outside the physical boundary of SAA W # 1, and that none of the buildings and structures within the property will be altered or damaged from the construction activities associated with the wall. Taking the nature of the undertaking into account along with the project's APE, I concur with your finding of no historic properties affected.

If you have any questions, please contact Dana Supemowicz of my staff at (916) 653-4533 or by e-mail at [email protected].

Sincerely,
~~n'aJ~~
State Historic Preservation Officer
-\.,.-
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3145 5/5/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

ATTACHMENT O

PROJECT EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3146 5/5/2026

PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE

FUTURE TRANSIT EXPANSION

OCTA / METROLINK

SANTA ANA REGIONAL

TRANSPORTATION CENTER

OC STREETCAR

TERMINUS STATION

AND PARKING

SANTIAGO ST

LOGAN ST

FULLER ST

FRUIT ST

LINCOLN AVE

STAFFORD ST

SANTA ANA BLVD
I-5 SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMP
I-5 SOUTHBOUND

ON-RAMP

FUTURE CROSSROADS

AT WASHINGTON
FUTURE

DEVELOPMENT

VERTICAL

CIRCULATION

TO STATION
FUTURE

DEVELOPMENT
FUTURE

DEVELOPMENT

METROLINK/
AMTRAK

STATION
FUTURE

DEVELOPMENT
0 25 50

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BLVD GRADE SEPARATION
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 3147 5/5/2026

AGREEMENT WITH MARK THOMAS & COMPANY TO PROVIDE DESIGN
SERVICES FOR SANTA ANA BLVD. GRADE SEPARATION
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 5th day of May, 2026 by and between Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., (“Consultant”), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (“City”).

RECITALS
A. On November 14, 2025, the City issued Request for Proposal (“RFP”) No. 25-131A, by which it sought qualified consultants to provide environmental, right-of-way, and engineering design services for grade separation projects with existing rail crossings.

B. Consultant submitted a responsive proposal that was selected by the City. Consultant represents that it is able and willing to provide the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP No. 25-131A.

C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm in the field.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall perform during the term of this Agreement, the tasks and obligations including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and adequately complete the services described and set forth in Exhibits A and B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

2. COMPENSATION
a. City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services for City, the rates and charges identified in Exhibit B. The total amount to be expended during the term of this Agreement shall not exceed $6,859,918, including any extension periods.
b. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. City and Consultant agree that all payments due and owing under this Agreement shall be made through Automated Clearing House (ACH) transfers. Consultant agrees to execute the City’s standard ACH Vendor Payment Authorization and provide required documentation. Upon verification of the data provided, the City will be authorized to deposit payments directly into Consultant’s account(s) with financial institutions.

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3148 5/5/2026
Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals which may reasonably be expected by City.

3. TERM
This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above for a three (3) year term with the option for the City to grant up to two, one-year extension(s), exercisable by a writing by the City Manager and the City Attorney, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 17, below.

4. PREVAILING WAGES
Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer-employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes.

6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS
This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Consultant shall require all subconsultants to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subconsultant prepares under this Agreement.

Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3149 5/5/2026
Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk.

7. INSURANCE
Insurance requirements attached hereto as Exhibit C.

8. INDEMNIFICATION
Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, consultants, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Consultant, its subconsultants, agents, employees, or other persons acting on its behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant’s services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant.

9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION
Consultant shall defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States’ letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement.

10. RECORDS
Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the City to EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3150 5/5/2026
examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement.

11. CONFIDENTIALITY
If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. “Confidential Information” shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City.

12. CERTIFICATIONS
The funds used to pay for this Agreement will be partly comprised of federal grant funds.

Consultant agrees and understands that it will comply with the terms of the Certifications attached hereto as Exhibit D, incorporated by reference into this Agreement. Consultant is referenced as Consultant in Exhibit D. Consultant shall keep itself informed of all City, State and Federal laws and regulations which may, in any manner, affect the performance of it services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall at all times, observe and comply with all such laws and regulations.

City and its officers and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity by reason of the failure of the Consultant to comply with this paragraph.

13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE
a. The Consultant or subrecipient must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, agent, or board member with a real or apparent conflict of interest may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by the Federal award. A conflict of interest includes when the employee, officer, agent, or board member, any member of their immediate family, their partner, or an organization that employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from an entity considered for a contract. An employee, officer, agent, and board member of the Consultant or subrecipient may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from consultants. However, the EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3151 5/5/2026
Consultant or subrecipient may set standards for situations where the financial interest is not substantial or a gift is an unsolicited item of nominal value. The Consultant's or subrecipient's standards of conduct must also provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations by its employees, officers, agents, or board members. b. If the Consultant or subrecipient has a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is not a State, local government, or Indian Tribe, the Consultant or subrecipient must also maintain written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest.

Organizational conflicts of interest mean that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the Consultant or subrecipient is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization.
c. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement.
d. No immediate family members of either the Mayor, City Council Member, or any appointed City Official, including appointed board and commission members, as defined under the City’s Municipal Code, whose position with the City shall award or influence the award of this Agreement, or any competing contract or amendment thereof, shall be employed in any capacity by the Consultant or have any other direct or indirect financial benefit or interest in this Agreement. e. The section also prohibits the awarding of any agreement, contract, grant, or any amendment to those awards, to any former full-time employee for one-year from date of employee separation except for any CalPERS retiree as authorized by City Council resolution
f. The Consultant must comply with all conflict of interest laws, ordinances, and regulations now in effect or hereafter to be enacted during the term of this Agreement.

The Consultant warrants that it is not now aware of any facts which conflict with the prohibitions defined above. If the Consultant hereafter becomes aware of any facts that might reasonably be expected to create a conflict of interest, it must immediately make full written disclosure of such facts to the City. Full written disclosure must include, but is not limited to, identification of all persons implicated and a complete description of all relevant circumstances. Failure to comply with the provisions of this paragraph will be a material breach of this Agreement.
g. Consultant covenants that none of its directors, officers, employees, or agents shall participate in selecting or administrating any subcontract supported (in whole or in part) by City funds stemming from the Agreement where the awarding of the subcontract has any direct or indirect financial benefit or interest to any individual, as defined in subsections (d) and (e) above.

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3152 5/5/2026

14. NON-DISCRIMINATION
Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations.

15. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT
This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein.

16. ASSIGNMENT
Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City’s ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other Consultants retained by City.

17. TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions:
a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product(s) completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate.
b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement.

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3153 5/5/2026

18. WAIVER
No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies.

19. JURISDICTION - VENUE
This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement.

20. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES
Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement.

21. FEDERAL REGULATIONS
Consultant shall comply with all applicable contractual provisions required by the United States Office of Management and Budget (OMB), as set for the in 2 CRF Part 200, whether or not expressly set forth in this document, including but not limited to those provisions set forth below.

Notwithstanding, anything to the contrary herein, including without limitation , the language in this Agreement, the actual language contained in federal statutes, federal regulations, federally promulgated materials and state statutes, shall control in determining any obligations under federal law in the event of a conflict with any terms, language or provisions contained in this Agreement.

Consultant shall not perform any act, fail to perform any act, or refuse to comply with any requests, which would cause City to be in violation of the federal terms and conditions. a. Federal Regulations – Consultant must comply with the government cost principles, uniform administrative requirements and audit requirements for federal grant program housed within Title 2, Part 180 of the Code of Federal Regulations. b. Debarment and Suspension – As required by Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, and 2 CFR §200.214 and codified in 2 CFR Part 200, Consultant must provide protection against waste, fraud, and abuse by debarring or suspending those persons deemed irresponsible in their dealings with the Federal government.

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3154 5/5/2026
c. Audit Records – With respect to all matters covered by this agreement all records shall be made available for audit and inspection by CITY, the grant agency and/or their duly authorized representatives for a period of three (3) years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report by the City of Santa Ana. For a period of three years after final delivery hereunder or until all claims related to this Agreement are finally settled, whichever is later, Consultant shall preserve and maintain all documents, papers and records relevant to the services provided in accordance with this Agreement, including the Attachments hereto. For the same time period, Consultant shall make said documents, papers and records available to City and the agency from which City received grant funds or their duly authorized representative(s), for examination, copying, or mechanical reproduction on or off the premises of Consultant, upon request during usual working hours.
d. Reports – Consultant shall provide to City all records and information requested by City for inclusion in quarterly reports and such other reports or records as City may be required to provide to the agency from which City received grant funds or other persons or agencies. e. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Handicapped) – All recipients of federal funds must comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (The Act). Therefore, the federal funds recipient pursuant to the requirements of The Act hereby gives assurance that no otherwise qualified handicapped person shall, solely by reason of handicap be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of or be subject to discrimination, including discrimination in employment, in any program or activity that receives or benefits from federal financial assistance. The Consultant agrees it will ensure that requirements of The Act shall be included in the agreements with and be binding on all of its consultants, subconsultants, assignees or successors.
f. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 – (ADA) Consultant must comply with all requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as applicable. g. Political Activity – None of the funds, materials, property, or services provided directly or indirectly under this agreement shall be used for any partisan political activity, or to further the election or defeat of any candidate for public office, or otherwise in violation of the provisions of the "Hatch Act".
h. No Lobbying – Consultant will comply with all applicable lobbying prohibitions and laws, including those found in the Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352, et seq.), and agrees that none of the funds provided under this award may be expended by the Consultant to pay any person to influence, or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any federal action concerning the award or renewal of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
i. Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity – Consultant will comply, and all its consultants (or subrecipients) will comply, with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1964, as amended; Subtitle A, Title II of the EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3155 5/5/2026
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (1990); Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended; Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972, as amended; Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970, as amended; Section 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912, as amended; Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended; Department of Justice Non-Discrimination Regulations, 28 CFR Part 42, Subparts C, D, E, and G; and Department of Justice regulations on disability discrimination, 28 CFR Part 35 and 39. In the event a Federal or State court, Federal or State administrative agency, or the Consultant makes a finding of discrimination after a due process hearing on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability against a recipient of funds, the Consultant will forward a copy of the findings to CITY which will, in turn, submit the findings to the Office of Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. If applicable, Consultant will comply with the equal opportunity clause in 41 C.F.R. 60-1.4(b) in accordance with Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Order No. 11375.
j. Equal Employment Opportunity – Consultant will comply, and all its consultants (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled “Equal Employment Opportunity,” as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR chapter 60), as applicable.
k. Public Contracts Code – Consultant will comply, and all its consultants (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the California Public Contract Code Section 10295.3, as applicable.
l. Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act – Consultant will comply, and all its consultants (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145) as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3), as applicable. m. David-Bacon Act – Consultant will comply, and all its consultants (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144 and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5), as applicable. n. Work Hours and Safety – Consultant will comply, and all its consultants (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of Sections 103 and 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5), as applicable.
o. Clean Air Act –

1. The Consultant agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.

2. The Consultant agrees to report each violation to CITY and understands and agrees that the CITY will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office.

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3156 5/5/2026

3. The consultant agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FEMA. p. Energy and Conservation – Consultant will comply, and all its consultants (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6201), as applicable.
q. Waste Disposal – Consultant will comply, and all its consultants (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as applicable. r. Patent Rights – Consultant agrees that the Department of Homeland Security shall have the authority to seek patent rights for any process, product, invention or discovery developed and paid for with funding through this Agreement based on the requirements of 37 CFR§ 401 and any other implementing regulations, as applicable.
s. Copyright – Consultant may copyright any books, publications or other copyrightable materials developed in the course of or under this Agreement. However, the federal awarding agency, State Administrative Agency (SAA) and City reserve a royalty-free, non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, for federal government, SAA and/or City purpose:
(1) the copyright in any work developed through this Agreement; and (2) any rights of copyright to which the subconsultant purchases ownership with support through this grant. The Federal government’s, SAA’s and City’s rights identified above must be conveyed to the publisher and the language of the publisher’s release form must ensure the preservation of these rights. t. Equal Employment in Construction Contracts – Pursuant to Equal Employment Opportunity requirements of 41 C.F.R. 60-1.4(b) in accordance with Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Order No. 11375, as to any construction contract thereunder, if applicable, during the performance of this contract, the consultant agrees as follows:
(1) The consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.

Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following:

Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3157 5/5/2026
provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. (2) The consultant will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.
(3) The consultant will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the consultant's legal duty to furnish information. (4) The consultant will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the consultant's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. (5) The consultant will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor.
(6) The consultant will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. (7) In the event of the consultant's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.
(8) The consultant will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3158 5/5/2026
paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subconsultant or vendor. The consultant will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance.
u. Prohibition on Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment – Consultant will comply, and all its consultants (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.216. Consultant will comply with FEMA Policy 405-143-1, Prohibitions on Expending FEMA Award Funds on Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services (Interim), which prohibits grant recipients and subrecipients from obligating or expending loan or grant funds to procure or obtain, extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain, or to enter into a contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system.

As described in Public Law 115-232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment:
(1) Telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (2) For the purpose of public safety, security of government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities).

(3) Telecommunications or video surveillance services produced by such entities or using such equipment.
(4) Telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country. v. Domestic Preferences for Procurements/Subcontracts – Consultant will comply, and all its consultants (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.322.

Consultant shall comply with the federal and recipient standards in the award of any subcontracts.

For purposes of this Agreement, subcontracts shall include but not be limited to purchase agreements, rental or lease agreements, third party agreements, consultant service contracts and EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3159 5/5/2026
construction subcontracts.

Consultant shall ensure that the terms of this Agreement with the CITY are incorporated into all Subconsultant Agreements. The Consultant shall submit all Subconsultant Agreements to the CITY for review prior to the release of any funds to the subconsultant. The Consultant shall withhold funds to any subconsultant agency that fails to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and their respective Subconsultant Agreement. (1) Recovered Materials
Consultant shall make maximum use of products containing recovered materials that are EPA-designated items unless the product cannot be acquired competitively within a timeframe providing for compliance with the contract performance schedule; Meeting contract performance requirements; or at a reasonable price.

Information about this requirement, along with the list of EPA-designated items, is available at EPA’s Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines webpage:
https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpg-program.

The Consultant also agrees to comply with all other applicable requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act.
(2) Domestic Preference for Procurements
Consultant should, to the greatest extent practicable, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States. This includes, but is not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products.

For purposes of this clause:

Produced in the United States means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States.

Manufactured products mean items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non-ferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber.
w. Termination for Cause and Convenience – Should Consultant fail for any reason to comply with the contractual obligations of this agreement within the time specified by this Agreement, the CITY reserves the right to terminate the Agreement, reserving all rights under state and federal law.
x. Contractual/Legal Remedies for Breach of Contract – Should Consultant fail for any reason EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3160 5/5/2026
to comply with the contractual obligations of this Agreement and/or willfully, knowingly or negligently breach any term, condition or requirement of the agreement, City may impose sanctions including but not limited to damages (liquidated damages and or penalties) and /or any other remedy available pursuant to the Agreement of the laws then in effect.

22. NOTICE
Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons:

To City:

City Clerk
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988
With courtesy copies to:

Executive Director, Public Works Agency
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702
To Consultant:

Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Attn: Pat Sommerville, Associate Principal
3200 El Camino Real, Suite 290
Irvine, CA 92602

A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded.

23. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3161 5/5/2026
power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney’s fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written.

ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA
JENNIFER L. HALL
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ALVARO NUÑEZ City Manager
MARK THOMAS & COMPANY INC.
(CONSULTANT):

SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney
By:

Kyle Nellesen By:

Assistant City Attorney Title:

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

Rodolfo Rosas, P.E.

Acting Executive Director
Public Works Agency
le Nellesen
i t t Cit Att
David A. Moritz
Executive Vice President
EXHIBIT 3
Rodolfo Rosas
Digitally signed by Rodolfo Rosas
DN: cn=Rodolfo Rosas,
[email protected], c=US
Date: 2026.04.06 14:14:25 -07'00'
City Council 22 – 3162 5/5/2026

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3163 5/5/2026
6&23(2):25.
&,7<2)6$17$$1$
5(48(67)25352326$/6
)25
(19,5210(17$/5,*+72):$< (1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1
6(59,&(6)256$17$$1$%/9'*5$'(6(3$5$7,21
5)312;;;;;
,1752'8&7,21352-(&7'(6&5,37,21
7KH6DQWD$QD%RXOHYDUG*UDGH6HSDUDWLRQ3URMHFWVKDOOLPSURYHVDIHW\SHGHVWULDQDFFHVVDQG LPSURYHFRQQHFWLYLW\E\VHSDUDWLQJWKHH[LVWLQJUDLOFURVVLQJZLWKWKH6RXWKHUQ&DOLIRUQLD5HJLRQDO 5DLO$XWKRULW\
6&55$
2UDQJH/LQHGRXEOHWUDFNVDW6DQWD$QD%RXOHYDUGDGMDFHQWWRWKH6DQWD $QD5HJLRQDO7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ&HQWHU
6$57&
ZLWKDQHZPXOWLPRGDOXQGHUSDVV7KHSURMHFWVKDOO
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
2&6WUHHWFDU

7KH 3URMHFW VKDOO UHFRQVWUXFWWKH 6&55$2UDQJHOLQH UDLO FURVVLQJWR EHFRPH D VDIHPRGHUQ VXVWDLQDEOHDQGPXOWLPRGDOKXEIRUHFRQRPLFDFWLYLW\DQGPRELOLW\7KH3URMHFWLQYROYHVJUDGH VHSDUDWLQJ 6DQWD $QD %RXOHYDUG DQG UHGXFLQJ WUDYHO ODQHV IURP VL[ WR IRXUODQHV DV ZHOO DV SURYLGLQJD SHGHVWULDQ EULGJH RYHU6DQWD$QD%RXOHYDUGWR6$57& UDLVHGPHGLDQV SURWHFWHG ELNHZD\VVLGHZDONVDQGVSDFHIRUDSHGHVWULDQSOD]D7KLVVKDOOLPSURYHFRQQHFWLYLW\WRQHDUE\ FRPPHUFLDORSSRUWXQLWLHVDQGLQILOOKRXVLQJ6$57&WKH6&55$UDLOURDGFRUULGRU'RZQWRZQ 6DQWD$QD,QWHUVWDWH
,
DQGWKHIXWXUH2&6WUHHWFDU
$WWKLVWLPHWKH&LW\LVSURFHHGLQJZLWKGHYHORSPHQWRIWKH3ODQV6SHFLILFDWLRQVDQG(VWLPDWHV

36 (
(QYLURQPHQWDO'RFXPHQWDWLRQLQFOXGLQJ7HFKQLFDO6WXGLHV5LJKWRI:D\(QJLQHHULQJ DQG$FTXLVLWLRQQHFHVVDU\WRSUHSDUHIRUFRQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHSURMHFW 6&23(2)6(59,&(6
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
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3164 5/5/2026
6HUYLFHVWREHSHUIRUPHGLQUHVSRQVHWRWKLV5)3LQFOXGHEXWQRWOLPLWHGWR
3URMHFW$GPLQLVWUDWLRQ
'DWD&ROOHFWLRQ
&RRUGLQDWLRQ
6WDQGDUGV
6LWH6XUYH\
(QYLURQPHQWDO'RFXPHQWDWLRQ
('

5RDGZD\'HVLJQ
5DLOURDG 6WUXFWXUDO'HVLJQ

5LJKW2I:D\
8WLOLW\&RRUGLQDWLRQ 5HORFDWLRQ
7UDIILF0DQDJHPHQW3ODQ
$JUHHPHQWV 3HUPLWV
&RQVWUXFWLRQ6XSSRUW
2SWLRQDO6HUYLFHV
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
352-(&7$'0,1,675$7,21
7KLVWDVNLQFOXGHVWKHGD\WRGD\PDQDJHPHQWRIWKH3URMHFW7KH&RQVXOWDQW3URMHFW0DQDJHU VKDOO PDLQWDLQ RQJRLQJ OLDLVRQ ZLWK WKH &LW\ 3URMHFW 0DQDJHU DJHQF\FRQWDFWV UDLOURDG UHJXODWRU\DJHQFLHVDQGXWLOLW\FRPSDQLHVWRSURPRWHHIIHFWLYHFRRUGLQDWLRQGXULQJWKHFRXUVH RI SURMHFW GHYHORSPHQW 7KH IROORZLQJ PDQDJHPHQW DQG DGPLQLVWUDWLYH GXWLHV VKDOO EH

SHUIRUPHG

x 6XSHUYLVHSURMHFWVWDIIVXEFRQVXOWDQWVFRRUGLQDWHDQGPRQLWRUZRUNIRUFRQIRUPDQFH ZLWKVHWVWDQGDUGVDQGSROLFLHV
x &RQGXFWLQWHUQDOPHHWLQJVZLWKSURMHFWVWDIIDQGVXEFRQVXOWDQWV x $SSO\IRUDQGREWDLQSHUPLWVQHFHVVDU\IRUWKHGHVLJQWHDPWREHRQWKHMREVLWH x $SSO\IRUDQGREWDLQ&RXQW\DQGRU&LW\DSSURYDOVDQGSHUPLWVDVQHFHVVDU\ x 3UHSDUHFLUFXODWHDQGILOHFRUUHVSRQGHQFHDQGPHPRUDQGDDVDSSURSULDWH x 0DLQWDLQ3URMHFWILOHVXVLQJVSHFLILHGILOLQJV\VWHP 3URMHFW 'HYHORSPHQW 7HDP
3'7
PHHWLQJV ZLWK WKH &LW\ 3URMHFW 0DQDJHU DQG RWKHU UHSUHVHQWDWLYHVIURPDIIHFWHGDJHQFLHVVKDOOEHKHOGDWOHDVWRQFHDPRQWKDQGPD\EHKHOGRQ DELZHHNO\EDVLV7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSUHSDUHPHHWLQJDJHQGDVDQGPLQXWHVIRUHDFKPHHWLQJ 7KHPLQXWHVVKDOOEHGLVWULEXWHGZLWKLQZRUNLQJGD\VDIWHUWKHPHHWLQJWRDOODWWHQGHHV7KH PLQXWHVVKDOOLQFOXGHEXWQRWEHOLPLWHGWRDOLVWRIDWWHQGHHVZLWKSKRQHQXPEHUVDQGHPDLO DV\QRSVLVRIGLVFXVVLRQLWHPVDQ\SHUWLQHQWLQIRUPDWLRQDFWLRQLWHPVDQGDOOIROORZXSVWR WKHDFWLRQLWHPV
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3165 5/5/2026
7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOPRQLWRUTXDOLW\RQDOOGHOLYHUDEOHVFDOFXODWLRQVDQGRWKHUZRUNSURGXFWV 7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSUHSDUHD4XDOLW\&RQWURO3ODQIRUDOOSULPHDQGVXEFRQVXOWDQWWDVNVIRU WKHSURMHFWDQGVXEPLWDFRS\WRWKH&LW\ZLWKLQWKLUW\
FDOHQGDUGD\VRI1RWLFHWR3URFHHG
7KLV LV QRW D VHSDUDWH WDVN EXW VKDOO EH LQFOXGHG DV SDUW RI 3URMHFW $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ 7KH &RQVXOWDQWVKDOODWWHQGPHHWLQJVDVUHTXLUHGWRFRPSOHWHWKH3URMHFWLQFOXGLQJ&DOWUDQV6DIHW\ 5HYLHZ PHHWLQJ 'HVLJQ 5HYLHZ PHHWLQJV &RQVWUXFWDELOLW\ 5HYLHZ PHHWLQJV 4XDOLW\ PHHWLQJV DQG LQIRUPDWLRQDO PHHWLQJV ZLWK VWDNHKROGHUV 3URYLGH WKH GHOLYHUDEOHV OLVWHG LQ RWKHUVHFWLRQVRIWKHVFRSHRIZRUN
$ %XGJHWLQJ
7KH&RQVXOWDQW VKDOO SUHSDUH EXGJHWV IRUHDFKWDVNDQGPLOHVWRQH IRUWKH3URMHFW6XFK EXGJHWVVKDOOEHHQWHUHGLQWRWKH&RQVXOWDQW¶V0DQDJHPHQW,QIRUPDWLRQ6\VWHPDORQJZLWK DFWXDOFRVWVLQFXUUHGDQGXVHGDVDEDVLVIRUFRVWPRQLWRULQJDQGFRQWURO % &RVW$FFRXQWLQJ
&RQVXOWDQW VKDOO SUHSDUH PRQWKO\ UHSRUWV RI H[SHQGLWXUHV IRU WKH 3URMHFW E\ WDVN DQG PLOHVWRQH ([SHQGLWXUHVLQFOXGH GLUHFWODERU FRVWV RWKHU GLUHFW FRVWV DQG VXEFRQVXOWDQW FRVWV 7KHVHUHSRUWVVKDOOEHLQFOXGHGDVVXSSRUWLQJGDWDIRULQYRLFHVSUHVHQWHGWRWKH&LW\ HYHU\PRQWKDQGVKDOOEHLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKH&LW\¶VLQYRLFLQJUHTXLUHPHQWV & 4XDOLW\&RQWURO3ODQ
7KH3ODQV6SHFLILFDWLRQVDQG(VWLPDWH
36 (
VKDOOEHVXEMHFWWRTXDOLW\FRQWUROUHYLHZV
EHIRUHVXEPLWWDO7KHVHUHYLHZVVKDOODVVXUHFRQIRUPDQFHWR&DOWUDQVDQG&LW\VWDQGDUGV DQG FULWHULD DV ZHOO DV PLQLPL]H W\SRJUDSKLFDO RPLVVLRQV &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO VXEPLW GRFXPHQWDWLRQRIWKHFRPSOHWHG4$4&UHYLHZ
' 3URJUHVV5HSRUWLQJ
3URJUHVVUHSRUWVVKDOOEHSUHSDUHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWK&LW\DQGJUDQWJXLGHOLQHV5HSRUWV VKDOOEHUHTXLUHGPRQWKO\DQGVKDOODFFRPSDQ\WKHLQYRLFH ( 3URMHFW6FKHGXOH
&ULWLFDO3DWK0HWKRG6FKHGXOH

:LWKLQWZR

ZHHNVIURPWKH1RWLFHWR3URFHHG
173
WKH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSURYLGHD
GHWDLOHGVFKHGXOHRIDQWLFLSDWHGVHUYLFHVWRPHHWWKH6FRSHRI:RUN3URYLGHDVFKHGXOH XVLQJ FDOHQGDU GD\V ZLWK DOLVW RIWDVNV DQG VXEWDVNV PLOHVWRQHV PDMRU DFWLYLWLHV DQG GHOLYHUDEOHVLQFOXGLQJ DJHQFLHV UHYLHZWLPH
DVVXPH ZHHNV IRU &DOWUDQV UHYLHZ DQG
DJHQF\ UHYLHZ RI HDFK VXEPLWWDO SDFNDJH
VXEPLWWDO DQG LVVXDQFH RI QHHGHG SHUPLWV
5HYLHZ RIWKH VFKHGXOH VKDOO RFFXUDW VXEVHTXHQWWUHQGPHHWLQJV$GMXVWPHQWV VKDOO EH PDGHDVQHFHVVDU\GXHWRFKDQJLQJFLUFXPVWDQFHV3ODQVVXEPLWWHGWRWKH&LW\WKDWDUH LQFRPSOHWH VKDOO EH UHWXUQHG WR WKH &RQVXOWDQW XQFKHFNHG DQG WKH &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO EH H[SHFWHG WR PDLQWDLQ WKH 3URMHFW GHOLYHU\ VFKHGXOH DW QR DGGLWLRQDO FRVW WR WKH &LW\ &RQVXOWDQWVKDOOEHIDPLOLDUZLWK&DOWUDQV¶SODQFKHFNVXEPLWWDOSURFHGXUHVDQGWLPHOLQHV DQGVKDOOVFKHGXOHSODQFKHFNVXEPLWWDOVLQRUGHUWRPDLQWDLQWKH3URMHFWVFKHGXOH EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3166 5/5/2026
) 5LVN$VVHVVPHQW
7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOLGHQWLI\DOOPDWHULDOULVNVDQGKDUPVWRWKHSURMHFWDQGWKHVWUDWHJLHV WKDWWKHOHDGDJHQF\DQGDQ\SURMHFWSDUWQHUVQHHGWRXQGHUWDNHRUZLOOXQGHUWDNHWRPLWLJDWH WKRVHULVNVDQGGHVFULEHWKHSRWHQWLDOHIIHFWVRIHDFKULVN LIDQ\
RQPHHWLQJWKHNH\SURMHFW
GHOLYHU\ VFKHGXOHPLOHVWRQHV SUHVHQWHGLQWKH 3URSRVHG 6FKHGXOH7KH&RQVXOWDQW VKDOO DVVHVVWKHJUHDWHVW ULVNVWRWKHSURMHFWDQGLGHQWLI\KRZWKHSURMHFWSDUWLHVZLOOPLWLJDWH WKRVH ULVNV $ UHSRUW GHWDLOLQJ LGHQWLILHG ULVNV VKDOO EH SUHSDUHG E\WKH &RQVXOWDQW DQG XSGDWHWKURXJKRXWWKHSURMHFWLPSOHPHQWDWLRQ
'$7$&2//(&7,21
7KH3URMHFWVKDOOLQYROYHWKHUHYLHZDQGDVVLPLODWLRQRIDODUJHDPRXQWRIH[LVWLQJGDWDDQG WKHJHQHUDWLRQRIQHZGDWD7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSHUIRUPDOOUHVHDUFKRIDJHQF\UHFRUGVDV QHFHVVDU\ WR VHFXUH WKH LQIRUPDWLRQ FOHDUDQFHV DQGRU SODQ UHYLHZ VHUYLFHV UHTXLUHG WR LGHQWLI\ORFDWHDQGDFFXUDWHO\OD\RXWDOORIWKHLPSURYHPHQWVDERYHDQGXQGHUJURXQGZLWKLQ &LW\52:
SULYDWHSURSHUWLHVDIIHFWHGZLWKWKH3URMHFW
6&55$
&RXQW\RI2UDQJH
DQGZLWK
&DOWUDQV52:&RQVXOWDQWVKDOODFFXUDWHO\OD\RXWHDVHPHQWVFHQWHUOLQH52:DGGUHVVHVDQG SULYDWHSURSHUW\OLQHV
3HUIRUPUHVHDUFKRIUHFRUGVLQFOXGLQJXWLOLWLHVDQGRWKHUDJHQF\UHFRUGVDVQHFHVVDU\WRVHFXUH LQIRUPDWLRQ UHTXLUHG WR LGHQWLI\ ORFDWH DQG DFFXUDWHO\ OD\RXW DOO H[LVWLQJ XWLOLWLHV LPSURYHPHQWVHDVHPHQWVDQGULJKWVRIZD\ZLWKLQSURMHFWOLPLWVWKDWPD\LQWHUIHUHZLWKWKH SURSRVHG LPSURYHPHQWV 7KH LQIRUPDWLRQ WR EH UHVHDUFKHG VKDOO EH DV D PLQLPXP WKH

IROORZLQJ

x 5HYLHZH[LVWLQJXWLOLW\DQGVWUHHWUHFRUGGUDZLQJSODQV x 3HUIRUP XWLOLW\ LQYHVWLJDWLRQXWLOLW\ FRRUGLQDWLRQ DQG SURYLGH XWLOLW\ UHORFDWLRQ UHFRPPHQGDWLRQV
x 3HUIRUP DQ H[LVWLQJ XWLOLW\ HDVHPHQW LQYHVWLJDWLRQ 3ULRU 5LJKWV IRU SURSRVHG

UHORFDWLRQ

x &RRUGLQDWHZLWK&RQVXOWDQW¶V5LJKWRI:D\$FTXLVLWLRQVXEFRQVXOWDQWWRSHUIRUPILHOG LQYHVWLJDWLRQDQGPHDVXUHPHQWWRDVVHVVH[LVWLQJVLWHFRQGLWLRQV x 3URYLGHDFRS\RIDOOXWLOLW\QRWLILFDWLRQVDQGUHVSRQVHVSULRUWRILUVWSURJUHVVSD\PHQW UHTXHVW
x &RRUGLQDWLRQ52:SHUPLWV
7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOGHWHUPLQHWKHRZQHUVKLSULJKWV
XWLOLWLHVLQWKHLURZQHDVHPHQWRUXWLOLWLHV
E\&LW\IUDQFKLVHDJUHHPHQW
RIXWLOLWLHVDIIHFWHGE\3URMHFWFRQVWUXFWLRQDQGVKDOOFRRUGLQDWH DQGQRWLI\WKH&LW\LIDQ\FRVWVDUHWREHSDLGE\WKH&LW\IRUXWLOLW\UHORFDWLRQVHDUO\LQWKH GHVLJQ SURFHVV 7KH &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO WUDFN WKH SURJUHVVVFKHGXOH RI WKH XWLOLW\ FRPSDQ\ UHORFDWLRQSODQSUHSDUDWLRQLQRUGHUWRKDYHWKHXWLOLW\IDFLOLW\UHORFDWHGSULRUWRFRQVWUXFWLRQ

SUHIHUUHG
RU WR HQVXUH ILQDO DSSURYHG XWLOLW\ UHORFDWLRQ SODQV DUH DWWDFKHG WR WKH &LW\ FRQVWUXFWLRQSODQVLQFOXGLQJWKHQXPEHURIZRUNLQJGD\VUHTXLUHGE\WKH8WLOLW\WRFRQVWUXFW WKHLUIDFLOLWLHVFOHDUO\LGHQWLILHGLQWKH6SHFLDO3URYLVLRQV$XWLOLW\PDWUL[VKDOOEHSUHSDUHG OLVWLQJWKHIDFLOLW\W\SHFRQVWUXFWLRQPDWHULDOORFDWLRQGHSWKDQGGLVSRVLWLRQRIXWLOLWLHVZLWKLQ WKH3URMHFWOLPLWV
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3167 5/5/2026
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

x ([LVWLQJLPSURYHPHQWSODQVHQJLQHHULQJUHSRUWVRIUHFRUG x 5LJKWRIZD\PDSSLQJRZQHUVKLSUHFRUGV
7LWOH5HSRUWV

x 3UHOLPLQDU\HQJLQHHULQJDQGUHSRUWVIRUWKLV3URMHFW x (QYLURQPHQWDOFOHDUDQFHDQGPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHV
x &LW\RWKHUDJHQF\HQJLQHHULQJGHVLJQVWDQGDUGVFRGHVDQGSODQSURFHVVLQJSURFHGXUHV x ([LVWLQJWRSRJUDSKLFPDSSLQJSKRWRVUHSRUWVPDLQWHQDQFHUHSRUWV³DVEXLOW´SODQV UHFRUG PDSV DQG VXUYH\V VWXG\ UHSRUWV DVVHVVRU PDSV FRQWUDFW GRFXPHQWV XWLOLW\ LQGH[PDSVORFDOVWUHHWLPSURYHPHQWGHYHORSPHQWSODQVDQGRWKHUSHUWLQHQWGDWDVKDOO EHREWDLQHGDQGUHYLHZHG
,Q FDVH RI FRQIOLFW DPELJXLWLHV GLVFUHSDQFLHV HUURUV RU RPLVVLRQV DPRQJ WKH UHIHUHQFH PDWHULDOVREWDLQHGE\&RQVXOWDQWIURPRWKHUDJHQFLHV&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOVXEPLWWKHPDWWHUWR &LW\IRUFODULILFDWLRQ$Q\ZRUNDIIHFWHGE\VXFKFRQIOLFWVDPELJXLWLHVGLVFUHSDQFLHVHUURUV RU RPLVVLRQV ZKLFK LV SHUIRUPHG E\ &RQVXOWDQW SULRU WR FODULILFDWLRQ E\ &LW\ VKDOO EH DW &RQVXOWDQW
VULVNDQGH[SHQVH,QHYHQWWKDWQRQVWDQGDUGIHDWXUHVEHFRPHDSSDUHQWGXULQJWKH LQLWLDOGHVLJQ&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSUHSDUHWKHQHFHVVDU\GHVLJQH[FHSWLRQVIROORZLQJ&DOWUDQVRU 6&55$DQGWKHUHVSHFWLYHFLW\¶VJXLGHOLQHV
7KH &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO SRVLWLYHO\ ORFDWH DOO ERWK KLJK DQG ORZULVN

SRWKROH
XWLOLWLHV LQ
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
7KH&LW\H[SHFWVWKDWWKHVHOHFWHGWHDPVKDOOPDNHWKHEHVWXVHRIH[LVWLQJGDWDWRPLQLPL]H ZDVWHDQGGXSOLFDWLRQRIZRUNHIIRUWV
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3168 5/5/2026
&225',1$7,21
7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOEHIXOO\UHVSRQVLEOHIRUWKHRYHUDOOPDQDJHPHQWDQGFRRUGLQDWLRQIRUWKH SURMHFWZKLFKPD\LQFOXGHEXWLVQRWOLPLWHGWRSURMHFWGHYHORSPHQWWHDPPHHWLQJVOLDLVRQ ZLWKDIIHFWHGDJHQFLHVDQGXWLOLW\FRPSDQLHV3UHSDUHSURJUHVVUHSRUWDQGVFKHGXOHVHFXULQJ SHUPLWVIRUDOOILHOGVWXGLHVDQGDQ\RWKHUUHTXLUHGSHUPLWVIURPRWKHUDJHQFLHV &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO FRRUGLQDWH ZLWK &LW\ RI 6DQWD $QD DQG LWV YDULRXV GHSDUWPHQWV VXFK DV
'HYHORSPHQW (QJLQHHULQJ 7UDIILF (QJLQHHULQJ :DWHU 6HUYLFHV 6DQWD $QD 5HJLRQDO 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ &HQWHU
6$57&
HWF
RWKHU LQYROYHG DJHQFLHV SULYDWH SURSHUW\ RZQHUV EXVLQHVV RZQHUVDQG GHYHORSHUVWRHQVXUHDFRPSDWLEOH GHVLJQDQG SKDVLQJ RIFRQVWUXFWLRQ ZLWKH[LVWLQJDQGSURSRVHGFRQGLWLRQV&RRUGLQDWLRQPD\LQFOXGHEXWVKDOOQRWQHFHVVDULO\EH OLPLWHGWRWKHIROORZLQJ

x 6&55$
x 3XEOLF8WLOLWLHV&RPPLVVLRQ
38&

x &DOWUDQV'LVWULFW
x 8WLOLW\&RPSDQLHV
x 2UDQJH&RXQW\ 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ $XWKRULW\
2&7$
LQFOXGLQJ UDLOURDG52: DQG EXV
RSHUDWLRQV
x 2WKHUUHJLRQDOEXVVHUYLFHV
x 3URSHUW\EXVLQHVVRZQHUVDQGUHVLGHQWV
&RPPXQLW\ HQJDJHPHQWLV D FULWLFDO FRPSRQHQW RIWKLV 3URMHFW 7KH&RQVXOWDQWWHDP VKDOO UHVSRQVLEOHWRFRRUGLQDWHDQGPDQDJHWKHFRPPXQLW\HQJDJHPHQWFRPSRQHQWLQFRQMXQFWLRQ ZLWK WKH &LW\ &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO SUHSDUH IRU VFKHGXOH SURGXFH DQG PDQDJH &RPPXQLW\ (QJDJHPHQW0HHWLQJVDWNH\GHFLVLRQSRLQWV3URYLGHUHQGHULQJVIRUSXEOLFPHHWLQJVVKRZLQJ WKHVHOHFWHGSODQ7KH&LW\DQWLFLSDWHVIRXUFRPPXQLW\PHHWLQJVDVPDQ\DVWZHOYHRQHRQ RQHPHHWLQJVZLWKSURSHUW\RZQHUVDQGRUEXVLQHVVRZQHUVDVZHOODVWZRSUHVHQWDWLRQVWR ,QIUDVWUXFWXUH &RPPLWWHH WKUHH SUHVHQWDWLRQV WR WKH 3ODQQLQJ &RPPLVVLRQ DQG WKH &LW\ &RXQFLORIWKHGHVLJQGXULQJWKHYDULRXVSURJUHVVSKDVHV%DVHGRQLQSXWWKH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOO LQFRUSRUDWHFKDQJHVWRWKHGHVLJQ
ZKHQSRVVLEOH
DQGSUHVHQWWKHILQDOVFKHPDWLFGHVLJQWRWKH
&RPPXQLW\ DQG &LW\ &RXQFLO XVLQJ FRORUHG ' LQWHUDFWLYH YLHZLQJQDYLJDWLRQ RI SURMHFW GHVLJQ DOWHUQDWLYHV DQG SKDVHV GHSLFWLQJ RYHUDOOORRN DQG IHHOWR DLGHLQ VWDNHKROGHUV¶ DQG SXEOLF¶VXQGHUVWDQGLQJRIWKHSURSRVHGLPSURYHPHQWV
&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOPDLQWDLQSRVLWLYHSXEOLFUHODWLRQVGXULQJGHVLJQWKURXJKDQHIIHFWLYHSXEOLF LQIRUPDWLRQSURJUDP
7KH'YLUWXDOPRGHOGHYHORSHGE\WKH&RQVXOWDQWPXVWKDYHWKHDELOLW\WR
D ,QWHUDFWLYHO\YLHZDQDO\]HDQGSUHVHQWWKH3URMHFW

E $QLPDWH VLPXODWLRQV WR GHSLFW H[LVWLQJ DQG SURSRVHG FRQGLWLRQV ZLWKLQ WKH 3URMHFW ERXQGDU\
EXLOGLQJV ODQGVFDSH VLJQDJH YHKLFOHV VLJQDOV SDYHPHQW VLGHZDON VWULSLQJUHOHYDQWGHVLJQIHDWXUHV

FUHDWHYLUWXDOWRXUVIRUSXEOLFDFFHVVFUHDWHÛDQG EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3169 5/5/2026
9LUWXDO5HDOLW\YLGHRV

F 3UHVHQWPXOWLSOHYLHZSRLQWVRUDQLPDWLRQSDWKV

G 9LHZH[LVWLQJFRQGLWLRQVDQGGHVLJQDOWHUQDWLYHV

H *HQHUDWHXQOLPLWHGVWLOOLPDJHVDQGFOLSSHGVLPXODWLRQYLGHRV DQG
I %HDFFHVVLEOHWR&LW\DQGSXEOLFDXGLHQFHVIURPDQ\ZHEFRQQHFWHGGHYLFH$FORXG FROODERUDWLRQ VHUYLFH VKDOO EH SURYLGHG WR HQDEOH &LW\ WR YLHZ DQG QDYLJDWH WKH YLVXDOL]DWLRQPRGHOVXVLQJVWDQGDUGLQWHUQHWEURZVHUV7KLVVHUYLFHQHHGVWREHDEOHWR H[WHQGWR SXEOLF VWDNHKROGHUVDQGHQJDJHLQZHEEDVHGPHHWLQJVZLWK VKDUHGPRGHO YLHZLQJ YLHZ DQG QDYLJDWH RQ ORFDO GHVNWRS FRPSXWHUV 7KH FORXG FROODERUDWLRQ VHUYLFHVKDOOH[WHQG IRUDSSUR[LPDWHO\PRQWKV
ZLWKRSWLRQWRH[WHQGDVQHHGHG

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
7KH3URMHFWSODQVVSHFLILFDWLRQVDQGHVWLPDWHVIRUWKHEULGJHVKDOOEHSUHSDUHGLQDFFRUGDQFH ZLWKFXUUHQW$$6+72DQG&DOWUDQV
UHJXODWLRQVSROLFLHVSURFHGXUHVPDQXDOVDQGVWDQGDUGV ,PSURYHPHQWV RIORFDO URDGVPD\ EH SUHSDUHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWK&LW\ VWDQGDUGVLQOLHXRI &DOWUDQVVWDQGDUGVDVGLUHFWHGE\&LW\$OO'RFXPHQWVVKDOOEHSUHSDUHGXVLQJ86VWDQGDUGV DQGGLPHQVLRQV$OVRFRPSOLDQFHZLWK$PHULFDQ5DLOZD\(QJLQHHULQJDQG0DLQWHQDQFHRI :D\ $VVRFLDWLRQ
$5(0$
UHTXLUHPHQWV 6&55$ 5DLOZD\8QLRQ 3DFLILF 5DLOURDG *XLGHOLQHV IRU 5DLOURDG *UDGH 6HSDUDWLRQ 3URMHFW DQGRU &RXQW\ RU &LW\ 6WDQGDUGV DV DSSURSULDWH6&55$VWDQGDUGSODQVDQGVSHFLILFDWLRQVVKDOOEHXVHGIRUDSSOLFDEOHGHVLJQV 5RDGZD\ZDWHUVHZHUOLJKWLQJVLJQDOODQGVFDSHWUDIILFVWULSLQJDQGVLJQDJHWUDIILFFRQWURO HURVLRQFRQWURODQGGUDLQDJHSODQVVKDOOEHSUHSDUHGRQ&LW\VWDQGDUGSODQDQGSURILOHVKHHWV 'HVLJQ RILPSURYHPHQWVZLWKLQ&DOWUDQV ULJKWV RI ZD\ PD\ EH UHTXLUHG SHU WKHLU VWDQGDUG GUDZLQJVDQGSODQV
6SHFLILFDWLRQVVKDOOEHSUHSDUHGLQFRQIRUPDQFHZLWKWKHFXUUHQWHGLWLRQVRIWKH &LW\6WDQGDUG 3ODQVDQG6SHFLILFDWLRQV6WDQGDUG6SHFLILFDWLRQVIRU3XEOLF:RUNV&RQVWUXFWLRQ *UHHQERRN

DQG&DOWUDQV¶6WDQGDUG6SHFLDO3URYLVLRQV
663
VODWHVWHGLWLRQ $VSDUWRIWKHZRUNLQYROYHGLQ
WKHSUHSDUDWLRQRIWKHSODQVVSHFLILFDWLRQVDQGHVWLPDWHVWKH(QJLQHHUVKDOOSUHSDUHDQGIXUQLVK WRWKH&LW\VSHFLDOSURYLVLRQVIRULWHPVRIZRUNLQFOXGHGLQWKHSODQVZKLFKDUHQRWFRYHUHGLQ WKH&LW\¶V6WDQGDUG6SHFLILFDWLRQVRU*UHHQERRN
,Q FDVH RI FRQIOLFW DPELJXLWLHV GLVFUHSDQFLHV HUURUV RU RPLVVLRQV DPRQJ WKH UHIHUHQFH PDWHULDOVREWDLQHGE\&RQVXOWDQWIURPRWKHUDJHQFLHV&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOVXEPLWWKHPDWWHUWR &LW\IRUFODULILFDWLRQ$Q\ZRUNDIIHFWHGE\VXFKFRQIOLFWVDPELJXLWLHVGLVFUHSDQFLHVHUURUVRU RPLVVLRQV ZKLFK LV SHUIRUPHG E\ &RQVXOWDQW SULRU WR FODULILFDWLRQ E\ &LW\ VKDOO EH DW &RQVXOWDQW
VULVNDQGH[SHQVH
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3170 5/5/2026
,QHYHQWWKDWQRQVWDQGDUGIHDWXUHVEHFRPHDSSDUHQWGXULQJWKHLQLWLDOGHVLJQ&RQVXOWDQWVKDOO SUHSDUH WKH QHFHVVDU\ GHVLJQ H[FHSWLRQV IROORZLQJ 6&55$ &DOWUDQV DQG WKH UHVSHFWLYH DJHQF\¶VJXLGHOLQHV
6,7(6859(<
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
&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSHUIRUPGHVLJQVXUYH\VLQFOXGLQJPDSSLQJDQGPDSSLQJXSGDWHVQHFHVVDU\WR FRPSOHWH D FRQVWUXFWLEOH 36 ( 7KLV LQFOXGHV KRUL]RQWDO DQG YHUWLFDO FRQWURO GUDLQDJH VXUYH\VWRSRJUDSKLFDOVXUYH\VFURVVVHFWLRQVJULGJUDGHVRSHQHQGHGWUDYHUVHVSURILOHGDWD VKHHWV DQG UHTXLUHG GRFXPHQWDWLRQ 6XUYH\V SHUIRUPHG E\&RQVXOWDQW VKDOO FRQIRUPWRWKH UHTXLUHPHQWVRIWKH/DQG6XUYH\RUV$FWDQGSHU&LW\¶VGLUHFWLRQ,QDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKH$FW UHVSRQVLEOHFKDUJHIRUWKHZRUNVKDOOUHVLGHZLWKD5HJLVWHUHG&LYLO(QJLQHHUUHJLVWHUHGSULRU WR-DQXDU\
RUD/LFHQVHG/DQG6XUYH\RULQWKH6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD 7KHVXUYH\RUVKDOOFRPSOHWHDWRSRJUDSKLFVXUYH\PDSRIWKHVLWHWRSUHSDUHDEDVHPDSIRU WKH SURMHFW SODQV DQG ULJKWRIZD\ HQJLQHHULQJ 7KH ILHOG VXUYH\ VKDOO DOVR EH UHTXLUHG WR SURYLGH H[LVWLQJ SURSHUW\ FRUQHUV
IRU GHWHUPLQDWLRQ RI ULJKWRIZD\ DFTXLVLWLRQV
VSRW
HOHYDWLRQVLGHQWLI\DQ\XQNQRZQIHDWXUHVLGHQWLI\DOONQRZQH[LVWLQJXWLOLWLHVLQWKHVWUHHWDQG RQ SULYDWH SURSHUW\ DQG FURVV VHFWLRQV 'HYHORS D EDVH PDS RI WKH SURSRVHG DOLJQPHQW LQFOXGLQJ SXEOLF ULJKWRIZD\ DQG SURSRVHG ULJKWRIZD\ DFTXLVLWLRQV ZLWK QHZ OHJDO GHVFULSWLRQV 3ODWV 5HFRUG RI 6XUYH\ SURSHUW\ ORW OLQHV VWUHHW FHQWHUOLQHV EHQFK PDUNV PRQXPHQWVDQGFRQWUROSRLQWVVKDOOEHFRQILUPHGDQGVKRZQRQWKHSODQV&RQVXOWDQWLVWR FRQGXFW VLWH YLVLWVWRLGHQWLI\DOO H[LVWLQJLPSURYHPHQWV DQG FRQGLWLRQVWKDWPD\ DIIHFWWKH GHVLJQDQGFRQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHSURSRVHGSURMHFWDQGH[LVWLQJVLWHFRQGLWLRQV3URYLGHRQH

IRRWFRQWRXUVEDVHGRQ&LW\RI6DQWD$QDYHUWLFDOGDWXP(VWDEOLVKVWUHHWFHQWHUOLQHVULJKWRI ZD\OLQHVH[LVWLQJDQGSURSRVHGDQGDOOHDVHPHQWVIURPDYDLODEOHUHFRUGLQIRUPDWLRQ3URYLGH WKHEDVLVRIEHDULQJ DQG EHQFKPDUN LQIRUPDWLRQ XVHG IRU WKH VXUYH\ DQG QHFHVVDU\ IRU FRQVWUXFWLRQ &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO ORFDWH DQG WLH DQ\ IHDWXUHV WKDW ZRXOG DIIHFW WKH GHVLJQ RU FRQVWUXFWLRQ
&RQGXFWDWKRURXJKLQGHSHQGHQWILHOGLQYHVWLJDWLRQRIWKHSURMHFWVLWHWRLGHQWLI\SUHH[LVWLQJ VLWHFRQGLWLRQVDQGSK\VLFDOFRQVWUDLQWVRIWKHSURMHFWDUHD&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOREWDLQ5HFRUGRI 6XUYH\VEHQFKPDUNDQGFHQWHUOLQHWLHLQIRUPDWLRQ7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOODOVRFRRUGLQDWHDQG YHULI\GDWXPZLWK6&55$DVWKHUDLOURDG52:PD\QRWEHRQWKHVDPHGDWXP EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3171 5/5/2026
(19,5210(17$/'2&80(17$7,21
('

$ 3URMHFW 6WXG\ 5HSRUW (TXLYDOHQW
365(
ZDV FRPSOHWHG DQG WKH SURMHFW ZDV FOHDUHG
HQYLURQPHQWDOO\LQ
$SSHQGL[BB
&RRUGLQDWLRQZLWKWKHDSSURSULDWHIHGHUDODJHQFLHV
LV UHTXLUHG WR GHWHUPLQH LI DQ (QYLURQPHQWDO 5HYDOLGDWLRQ RU RWKHU DSSURSULDWH OHYHO RI FOHDUDQFHLVQHFHVVDU\EDVHGRQWKHSDVVDJHRIWLPHDQGFKDQJHGFRQGLWLRQVWRWKHSURMHFWVLWH 7KHSURMHFWIXQGLQJSODQLQFOXGHV)HGHUDO6WDWHDQG/RFDO IXQGV WKHUHIRUHSUHSDUDWLRQRI
GRFXPHQWVDQGVWXGLHVIRUREWDLQLQJFRPSOLDQFHZLWK1(3$DUHUHTXLUHG$VDOOWKHSURMHFW IXQGLQJVRXUFHVKDYHQRWEHHQILQDOL]HGDQGDGGLWLRQDOJUDQWVDUHUHTXLUHGWKH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOO DVVXPH 1(3$ FRPSOLDQFH ZLWK HQYLURQPHQWDO UHTXLUHPHQWV IRU ERWK )HGHUDO 5DLO $GPLQLVWUDWLRQDQG)HGHUDO+LJKZD\$GPLQLVWUDWLRQ
6LQFHWKH3URMHFWLVH[SHFWHGWRHOLPLQDWHDQH[LVWLQJJUDGHFURVVLQJLWLVDQWLFLSDWHGWKDWWKH 3URMHFWVKDOOEHVWDWXWRULO\H[HPSWIURPFRPSOLDQFHZLWK&(4$+RZHYHULQRUGHUWRHQVXUH WKH&LW\LVPLQLPL]LQJSRWHQWLDOHIIHFWVRQHQYLURQPHQWDOUHVRXUFHVEXVLQHVVHVDQGUHVLGHQWV LQWKHDUHDWKH3URMHFWVKDOOUHTXLUHDOOWHFKQLFDOVWXGLHVWKDWDUHW\SLFDOO\SHUIRUPHGDVSDUWRI WKHHQYLURQPHQWDOGRFXPHQWDWLRQSURFHVV
7KH &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO SUHSDUH DWKRURXJK SURMHFW GHVFULSWLRQ GHILQLQJ WKH OLPLWV RI SURMHFW UHODWHG DFWLYLWLHV ZKLFK VKDOO EH XVHG DV WKH EDVLV IRU HQYLURQPHQWDO WHFKQLFDO VWXGLHV FRQGXFWHG IRU WKLV SURMHFW 3XUVXDQW WR VHFWLRQ RI WKH &DOLIRUQLD (QYLURQPHQWDO 4XDOLW\ $FW
&(4$
DQG &(4$ *XLGHOLQHV 6HFWLRQ
J
WKH VWDWH OHJLVODWXUH KDV
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

DQGSURYLGHWRWKH&LW\IRUDSSURYDODQGVXEPLWWDOWRWKH6WDWH&OHDULQJKRXVH,QDGGLWLRQRQFH ELRORJLFDOFXOWXUDOQRLVHDQGFRPPXQLW\LPSDFWUHSRUWVKDYHEHHQFRPSOHWHGDQGDSSURYHG E\WKH &LW\ WKH &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO SUHSDUH DOHWWHU UHSRUW VXPPDUL]LQJWKH ILQGLQJV RI WKHVH UHSRUWVDVZHOODVJHQHUDOLQIRUPDWLRQUHODWHGWRSXEOLFRXWUHDFKWKDWZDVFRQGXFWHGLQVXSSRUW RIWKHSURMHFW

&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOGHYHORS3URMHFW9LFLQLW\DQG3URMHFW/RFDWLRQ0DSVDVZHOODVDVHWRIPDSVWKDW FOHDUO\VKRZVWKHORFDWLRQDQGIHDWXUHVRIWKHDOWHUQDWLYHXQGHUFRQVLGHUDWLRQ$GGLWLRQDOO\EDVH PDSSLQJ RI WKH HQYLURQPHQWDO FRPSRQHQWVGDWD 7KHVH FRPSRQHQWVGDWD LQFOXGH 6HFWLRQ KD]DUGRXVPDWHULDOVVLWHVDQGODQGXVHVDQG ULJKWRIZD\VLWHV'DWD IURPSXEOLFO\DYDLODEOH VRXUFHVVKDOOEHXVHGDQGDGMXVWHGZKHUHDSSURSULDWHEDVHGRQILHOGVXUYH\VDQGREVHUYDWLRQV FRQGXFWHGE\WKH&RQVXOWDQW
(QYLURQPHQWDO &OHDUDQFH 7HFKQLFDO VWXGLHV DQG RWKHU LQIRUPDWLRQ PD\ EH UHTXLUHG WR EH SUHSDUHGLQFOXGH EXW QRWOLPLWHGWRWKH IROORZLQJ
1DWXUDO(QYLURQPHQW 6WXGLHV%LRORJLFDO
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3172 5/5/2026
$VVHVVPHQWV,QLWLDO6LWH$VVHVVPHQW$HULDO'HSRVLWHG/HDG5HSRUW$VEHVWRV6XUYH\5HSRUW 9LVXDO ,PSDFW 6WXG\ 5LJKWRI:D\ ,PSDFW 6WXG\ 5HORFDWLRQ ,PSDFW 6WXG\ &RPPXQLW\ ,PSDFW$VVHVVPHQW1RLVH DQG9LEUDWLRQ$QDO\VLV DQG7HFKQLFDO 6WXG\&XOWXUDO5HVRXUFHV 6WXG\$UHDRI3RWHQWLDO(IIHFWV
$3(
0DS1RLVH6WXG\1RLVH$EDWHPHQW'HFLVLRQ5HSRUW
$LU 4XDOLW\ 6WXG\ :DWHU 4XDOLW\ 6WXG\ +D]DUGRXV :DVWH0DWHULDO 3KDVH ,, 6WXG\ 3DOHRQWRORJ\ 6WXG\ :HWODQG $VVHVVPHQWV 3URWRFRO 6XUYH\V 7ULEDO &XOWXUDO 5HVRXUFHV $UFKHRORJLFDO6XUYH\5HSRUWRURWKHUUHTXLUHGVWXGLHV 7UDIILF&LUFXODWLRQ6WXG\8SGDWH
,QDGGLWLRQWRWKHVWXGLHVLGHQWLILHGDERYHDIRFXVHGWUDIILFVWXG\LVUHTXLUHGWKDWGRFXPHQWVWKH PHWKRGRORJ\DQGUHVXOWVRIDQDQDO\VLVSHUIRUPHGWRHYDOXDWHWUDIILFRSHUDWLRQVIRUWKHSURSRVHG JUDGHVHSDUDWLRQRIWKHH[LVWLQJ6DQWD$QD%RXOHYDUG2UDQJH&RXQW\7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ$XWKRULW\

2&7$
0HWUROLQNDWJUDGHFURVVLQJLQWKH&LW\RI6DQWD$QD2UDQJH&RXQW\&DOLIRUQLD7KH SUHYLRXV7UDIILF&LUFXODWLRQ 6WXG\FRQGXFWHGLQ0D\ HYDOXDWHGD VL[ODQH 6DQWD$QD %RXOHYDUG
0DMRU$UWHULDO
+RZHYHUWKH&LW\RI6DQWD$QDDGRSWHGWKH*HQHUDO3ODQ0RELOLW\ (OHPHQW8SGDWHLQ$SULO$VSDUWRIWKDWXSGDWH6DQWD$QD%RXOHYDUGEHWZHHQ6DQWLDJR 6WUHHW DQGWKH ,QWHUVWDWH
,
VRXWKERXQG RIIUDPSLV SURSRVHGWR EH D IRXUODQH 3ULPDU\ $UWHULDOSHUWKH0DVWHU3ODQRI6WUHHWVDQG+LJKZD\V7KHWUDIILFVWXG\ZLOOWKHUHIRUHQHHGWR EHXSGDWHGWRUHIOHFWDIRXUODQHVHFWLRQRI6DQWD$QD%RXOHYDUG7KHSURMHFWGHVFULSWLRQLVDV

IROORZV

x (DVWOHJRI6DQWLDJR6WUHHW6DQWD$QD%RXOHYDUGWRSURYLGHRQHOHIWWXUQWZRWKURXJKV DQGRQHULJKWWXUQODQH
x 7HUPLQDWLRQRI/RJDQ6WUHHWQRUWKRI6DQWD$QD%RXOHYDUGYLDFRQVWUXFWLRQRIFXOGHVDF x ,QWHUVHFWLRQRI)XOOHU6WUHHW6DQWD$QD%RXOHYDUG

o 2QH1%VKDUHGOHIWWKURXJKULJKW
o 2QH6%VKDUHGOHIWWKURXJKULJKW
o 2QH(%OHIWWXUQODQHRQH(%WKURXJKODQHDQGRQH(%VKDUHGWKURXJKULJKWWXUQ ODQH
o 2QH:%OHIWWXUQODQHRQH:%WKURXJKODQHDQGRQH:%VKDUHGWKURXJKULJKW WXUQODQH
x :HVWOHJRI,6%RIIUDPS6DQWD$QD%RXOHYDUGWRSURYLGHGXDOOHIWWXUQVDQGWZR WKURXJKODQHV
x )RFXVHG7UDIILF6WXG\6FHQDULRV
([LVWLQJ&RQGLWLRQV
7KLVVHFWLRQZLOOSUHVHQWDQRYHUYLHZRIWKHH[LVWLQJURDGZD\ V\VWHPWUDQVLWQHWZRUNDQGSHGHVWULDQELF\FOHIDFLOLWLHVZLWKLQWKHVWXG\DUHDDORQJ ZLWKH[LVWLQJWUDIILFYROXPHVDQGLQWHUVHFWLRQDQGURDGZD\OHYHOVRIVHUYLFH 2SHQLQJ<HDU&RQGLWLRQV
'RFXPHQWPHWKRGRORJ\XWLOL]HGWRGHYHORSEDFNJURXQG
RSHQLQJ\HDUWUDIILFIRUHFDVWVLQFOXGLQJDPELHQWJURZWKUDWHVDQGWUDIILFIURPIXWXUH GHYHORSPHQWSURMHFWV
)XWXUH<HDU&RQGLWLRQV
)XWXUH\HDUFRQGLWLRQVWREHEDVHGRQ2&7$¶VODWHVWWUDYHO GHPDQGPRGHO2UDQJH&RXQW\7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ$QDO\VLV0RGHO 2&7$0

([LVWLQJSOXV&RQVWUXFWLRQ&RQGLWLRQV
$QDQDO\VLVRISRWHQWLDOLPSDFWVGXULQJ
FRQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHSURSRVHGSURMHFW
LHWHPSRUDU\UHGXFWLRQLQFDSDFLW\

2SHQLQJSOXV3URMHFW&RQGLWLRQV
2SHQLQJ\HDUWUDIILFYROXPHVZLWKSURMHFWURDGZD\
FRQILJXUDWLRQ
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3173 5/5/2026
)XWXUHSOXV3URMHFW&RQGLWLRQV
)XWXUH\HDUWUDIILFYROXPHVZLWKSURMHFWURDGZD\
FRQILJXUDWLRQ
x 7UDIILF6WXG\$UHD/RFDWLRQV
)RFXVHG7UDIILF6WXG\VKDOODQDO\]HWKHIROORZLQJLQWHUVHFWLRQVDQGURDGZD\VHJPHQWV FRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKH&LW\RI6DQWD$QD907DQG7UDIILF,PSDFW6WXG\*XLGHOLQHV

6HSWHPEHU

6DQWLDJR6WUHHW6DQWD$QD%RXOHYDUG
)XOOHU6WUHHW6DQWD$QD%RXOHYDUG
,6%2II5DPS6DQWD$QD%RXOHYDUG
6DQWD$QD%RXOHYDUGIURP6DQWLDJR6WUHHWWR)XOOHU6WUHHW 6DQWD$QD%RXOHYDUGIURP)XOOHU6WUHHWWR,6%2II5DPS $OWKRXJKWKHSURMHFWLVDQWLFLSDWHGWRVFUHHQRXWIURPD907DQDO\VLVGXHWRWKHUHGXFWLRQ LQWUDYHOODQHVD907VFUHHQLQJDQDO\VLVLVVWLOOUHTXLUHG &RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSUHSDUHDOLVWRIWKHSURSRVHGWHFKQLFDOVWXGLHVWKDWZRXOGVXSSRUWWKHEHQHILWV RI WKH 3URMHFW &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO FRRUGLQDWH DQG VHFXUH DSSURYDO RI &DOWUDQV (QYLURQPHQWDO UHYLHZJURXSRQWKHOLVWRIVWXGLHVSULRUWRVWDUWRIZRUNRQWKH(QYLURQPHQWDO&OHDUDQFHHIIRUW 52$':$<'(6,*1
$OOHQJLQHHULQJZRUNVKDOOEHSHUIRUPHGE\D3URIHVVLRQDO(QJLQHHUUHJLVWHUHGLQWKH6WDWHRI &DOLIRUQLD$OOUHSRUWVSODQVDQGFRVWRSLQLRQVVKDOOEHWRDOHYHORISURIHVVLRQDOFRPSHWHQFH WKDWLVFRPPRQDPRQJHQJLQHHUVSHUIRUPLQJOLNHVHUYLFHV$OOILQDOUHSRUWVSODQVWHFKQLFDO VSHFLILFDWLRQVDQGFRVWRSLQLRQVVKDOOEHVWDPSHGDQGVLJQHGE\WKH&LYLO(QJLQHHUUHVSRQVLEOH IRUWKHZRUN
&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOLQFRUSRUDWHDOOHQYLURQPHQWDOUHTXLUHPHQWVDQGPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHVLQWRWKH GHVLJQRIWKHSURMHFWLQFOXGLQJEXWQRWOLPLWHGWRDLUZDWHUTXDOLW\QHVWLQJELUGVHQGDQJHUHG VSHFLHVHWFLQWRWKH3URMHFWFRQVWUXFWLRQGRFXPHQWV 3UHSDUHSODQVLQ$XWR&$'':*RU0LFUR6WDWLRQ&RQQHFW'*1IRUPDWDQGSURYLGHDQ HOHFWURQLFILOHVXEPLWWDOLQWKHSUHIHUUHGIRUPDWWRWKH&LW\FRQWDLQLQJWKHSODQV LQFOXGLQJDOO
[UHIV
DORQJZLWK3')ILOHV3UHSDUHILQDOGUDZLQJVIRUELGGLQJDQGFRQVWUXFWLRQLQ3')ILOH IRUPDWZLWKDQDGGLWLRQDOVHWVRQLQFK[LQFKERQGSDSHU7KHRULJLQDOGUDZLQJVDQG GLJLWDOILOHVVKDOOEHWKHSURSHUW\RIWKH&LW\
7KHVSHFLDOSURYLVLRQVDQGWHFKQLFDOVSHFLILFDWLRQVVHFWLRQVKDOOEHSUHSDUHGXVLQJ0LFURVRIW :RUGFRQIRUPWRWKH*UHHQERRNDQG&LW\RI6DQWD$QDERLOHUSODWHVSHFLILFDWLRQVIRUWKHVWUHHW DQGXWLOLWLHVSRUWLRQRIWKHSURMHFW%ULGJH6SHFLILFDWLRQVVKDOOEHSUHSDUHGLQFRQIRUPDQFH ZLWKWKH&DOWUDQV%ULGJH'HVLJQ6SHFLILFDWLRQV'LYLVLRQRI6WUXFWXUHVFXUUHQWHGLWLRQ7KH &RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSUHSDUHDQGIXUQLVKVSHFLDOSURYLVLRQVIRULWHPVRIZRUNLQFOXGHGLQWKHSODQV ZKLFK DUH QRW FRYHUHG LQ WKH 6WDQGDUG 6SHFLILFDWLRQV &DOWUDQVDSSURYHG VWDQGDUG VSHFLDO SURYLVLRQVDQG&LW\DSSURYHGVWDQGDUGVSHFLDOSURYLVLRQV EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3174 5/5/2026
&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSUHSDUHDSUHOLPLQDU\FRVWHVWLPDWH7KURXJKRXWGHYHORSPHQWRIWKH36 ( &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO XSGDWH WKLV HVWLPDWH XVLQJ WKH &LW\ V FRVW HVWLPDWH IRUPDW ZLWK WKH ILQDO
HVWLPDWH GXHZLWKWKH SODQV DQG VSHFLILFDWLRQV ,IWKLV FRVW HVWLPDWH RU DQ\ RIWKH XSGDWHV H[FHHGVWKH3URMHFW&RVW%XGJHWDVSURYLGHGE\WKH&LW\ VSURMHFWPDQDJHU&RQVXOWDQWVKDOO
UHFRPPHQGDQGLPSOHPHQWDOWHUQDWLYHVIRUUHGXFLQJWKHSURMHFWFRVWVWRZLWKLQWKHEXGJHW $ 5RDGZD\'HVLJQ
5RDGZD\RUUHODWHGIDFLOLWLHVSODQVVKDOOEHSUHSDUHGLQFRQIRUPDQFHZLWKWKHFXUUHQW&LW\ 'HVLJQDQG6WDQGDUG3ODQVIRUURDGZD\ZLWKLQ&LW\ULJKWRIZD\DQGVKDOOEHSHU&DOWUDQV VWDQGDUGVDQGUHTXLUHPHQWVZLWKLQ&DOWUDQVULJKWRIZD\$OO5RDGZD\SODQVVKDOOEHRQ VLQJOH VKHHW ILOHV *UDSKLF ILOHV VKDOO FRQIRUP WR WKH &DOWUDQV FXUUHQW VWDQGDUGV DQG UHTXLUHPHQWVIRU'DWD)RUPDW
% 'UDLQDJH'HVLJQ
&RQVXOWDQW VKDOO SUHSDUH DQG VXEPLW K\GURORJLF DQG K\GUDXOLF DQDO\VHV WR VXSSRUW DQ\ UHTXLUHGVWRUPGUDLQUHORFDWLRQDQGUHDOLJQPHQW&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSUHSDUH+\GUDXOLFVDQG +\GURORJ\5HSRUWVDVQHHGHGWRDGGUHVVH[LVWLQJDQGSURSRVHGGUDLQDJHFRQGLWLRQVDQG DQ\ FKDQJHV FDXVHG E\ WKH SURSRVHG GHVLJQ LQFOXGLQJ PLWLJDWLRQ &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO LQYHVWLJDWHK\GURORJLFDQGK\GUDXOLFIHDWXUHVRIWKHVLWHDVQHFHVVDU\WRDFFRPPRGDWHWKH JUDGHVHSDUDWLRQ
+\GUDXOLF DQG 'UDLQDJH (QJLQHHULQJ 7KH &RQVXOWDQW¶V DQDO\VLV VKDOO EH FORVHO\ FRRUGLQDWHGZLWKWKHDIIHFWHGSURSHUWLHVDQGDJHQFLHVLQFOXGLQJWKH&RXQW\RI2UDQJH &DOWUDQV DQG 6&55$ 7KH 'HVLJQ 'UDLQDJH 5HSRUW VKDOO TXDQWLI\ WKH PDJQLWXGH DQG IUHTXHQF\RIGHVLJQIORZVIURPDGMDFHQWDUHDVWRWKH352-(&7DUHDDVZHOODVWKHYROXPHV DWWULEXWDEOHWRWKHSURSRVHGLPSURYHPHQWV
& :DWHU4XDOLW\3ODQV
&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSUHSDUHD:DWHU4XDOLW\0DQDJHPHQW3ODQ :403
IRUWKHSURMHFWDV
UHTXLUHGIRUXUEDQUXQRIIIURPPXQLFLSDOVHSDUDWHVWRUPVHZHUV\VWHPV 06SHUPLW
7KH
VFRSHRIWKH:403VKDOOLQFOXGHUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVIRUSRVWFRQVWUXFWLRQSHUPDQHQWEHVW PDQDJHPHQWSUDFWLFHV
%03V
LQFOXGLQJVRXUFHFRQWURO
VWUXFWXUDODQGQRQVWUXFWXUDO
DQG
WUHDWPHQW %03V 5HFRPPHQGDWLRQV IRU %03V VKDOO EH LQFRUSRUDWHG LQWR WKH SURMHFW V
36 (&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSURYLGHEDVH3URMHFWGDWDIRU6:333SUHSDUDWLRQ DUHDVVORSHV
HWF

7KHFRQVWUXFWLRQGRFXPHQWVVKDOOUHTXLUHWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQ&RQWUDFWRUWRHQJDJHDOLFHQVHG HQJLQHHUWRSUHSDUHD6WRUP:DWHU3ROOXWLRQ3UHYHQWLRQ3ODQ 6:333
IRUWKLV3URMHFWWKDW
FRYHUVDOOLWHPVZLWKLQWKHVFRSHRIZRUN
' /DQGVFDSHDQG,UULJDWLRQSODQV
/DQGVFDSHDQG,UULJDWLRQSODQVVKDOOEHSUHSDUHGLQFRQIRUPDQFHZLWK&LW\¶VVWDQGDUGVDQG UHTXLUHPHQWV
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3175 5/5/2026
( 'HOLYHUDEOHV

'HOLYHUDEOHVVKDOOLQFOXGHEXWQRWEHOLPLWHGWRWKHIROORZLQJ
ϭ͘ 3ODQV
x 7LWOHVKHHWZLWKORFDWLRQPDS
x 7\SLFDOVHFWLRQV
x .H\PDSDQGOLQHLQGH[
x 'LVSRVLWLRQDQGGHPROLWLRQSODQV
x 5RDGZD\GHVLJQSODQVDQGGHWDLOV
x 3URILOHVZLWKVXSHUHOHYDWLRQGLDJUDPV
x &RQVWUXFWLRQGHWDLOVDQGFRQVWUXFWLRQQRWHV
x 'UDLQDJHOD\RXWVSURILOHVDQGGHWDLOV
x 6LJQLQJ 6WULSLQJSODQV
x 6WDJHFRQVWUXFWLRQDQGWUDIILFKDQGOLQJSODQ
x 'HWRXUOD\RXWSODQV
x 6WUHHWOLJKWHOHFWULFDOSODQVDQGGHWDLOV
WHPSRUDU\DQGSHUPDQHQW

x &RQVWUXFWLRQDUHDVLJQGHWDLOV
x 6LJQDODQGVLJQDOGHWDLOV
x 6LWHFRQWURODQGIHQFLQJSODQDQGGHWDLOV
x 6DIHW\EDUULHUVSODQDQGGHWDLOV
x 6RXQGZDOODQGRUUHWDLQLQJZDOOSODQVDQGGHWDLOV
x 13'(6HURVLRQFRQWUROSODQV
x 8WLOLW\UHORFDWLRQSODQVDQGGHWDLOV
x /DQGVFDSLQJDQG,UULJDWLRQSODQVDQGGHWDLOV
x 6WUXFWXUHSODQVDQGGHWDLOV
x :DWHU4XDOLW\0DQDJHPHQW3ODQ
:403

x 6WRUP:DWHU3ROOXWLRQ3ODQ3UHSDUDWLRQ
6:333

x 0LVFHOODQHRXVGHWDLOV
x $HVWKHWLFGHWDLOV
2WKHU'HOLYHUDEOHV
x &RQVWUXFWLRQ&RVW(VWLPDWH
x 3URMHFW6SHFLDO3URYLVLRQVDQG7HFKQLFDO6SHFLILFDWLRQV x 3URYLGHDPLQLPDOO\GHWDLOHGFRQVWUXFWLRQ&ULWLFDO3DWK0HWKRG &30
VFKHGXOHWR
VXSSRUWWKHFDOFXODWLRQRIWKHQXPEHURI:RUNLQJ'D\VIRUWKH3URMHFWFRQVWUXFWLRQ x $OOWHFKQLFDOVWXGLHVDQGUHSRUWV
'UDLQDJHUHSRUWVDQGFDOFXODWLRQV
6WUXFWXUDOUHSRUWVDQGFDOFXODWLRQV
5HWDLQLQJ:DOO6RXQG:DOOUHSRUWVDQGFDOFXODWLRQV
7UDIILF0DQDJHPHQW3ODQ
) 3ODQ&KHFNV
&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOVXEPLW

VHWVRILQFK[LQFKDQG

VHWVRILQFK[LQFK
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3176 5/5/2026
SODQVRQERQGSDSHUDQGWKHODWHVWFRQVWUXFWLRQFRVWHVWLPDWHZLWKHDFKVXEPLWWDO

DQG)LQDO
&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOVXEPLW

VHWVRIVSHFLILFDWLRQV
EHJLQQLQJ
ZLWKWKHVXEPLWWDO
3DSHUVXEPLWWDOVVKDOOEHDFFRPSDQLHGE\HOHFWURQLFFRSLHV 3')
DQG:25'ILOHV
RIVXEPLWWDOV7KHILQDOVXEPLWWDOVKDOOLQFOXGHRQH

VHWRILQFK[
LQFK RULJLQDO VLJQHGVHDOHG SODQV RQ ERQG SDSHU RQH
VHW RI VLJQHGVHDOHG ILQDO
VSHFLILFDWLRQV DSSHQGLFHV ELG IRUP FRQVWUXFWLRQ FRVW HVWLPDWH DQG HOHFWURQLF ILOHV DV GHVFULEHGKHUHLQ
* %LGGLQJ3KDVH6XSSRUW
$VVLVWWKH&LW\LQSURYLGLQJFODULILFDWLRQDQGSUHSDUHLQIRUPDWLRQWREHXVHGLQDGGHQGDDV QHHGHGIRUTXHVWLRQVWKDWPD\DULVHGXULQJWKHELGGLQJSURFHVV&LW\VKDOOSUHSDUHDQGPDNH DYDLODEOHWRSODQKROGHUVDQ\UHTXLUHGDGGHQGD$WWHQGWKHSUHELGPHHWLQJDQGDVVLVWWKH &LW\ZLWKELGHYDOXDWLRQVDQGUHFRPPHQGDWLRQRIELGDZDUG + &RQIRUPHG3ODQVDQG6SHFLILFDWLRQV
3UHSDUH FRQIRUPHG SODQV DQG VSHFLILFDWLRQV IRU XVH LQ FRQVWUXFWLQJ WKH SURMHFW 7KH FRQIRUPHGSODQVDQGVSHFLILFDWLRQVVKDOOUHIOHFWFKDQJHVPDGHGXULQJELGGLQJDQGVKDOOEH QRWHGDVDUHYLVLRQWRWKHILQDOGHVLJQSODQV
5$,/52$' 6758&785$/'(6,*1
$ 5DLOURDG %ULGJH'HVLJQ
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
City Council 22 – 3177 5/5/2026
&RQVXOWDQW VKDOO VXEPLW UDLOURDG EULGJH FRQFHSW DQG SODQV WR 6&55$ YLD WKH &LW\ IRU UHYLHZDQGDSSURYDO
% *HRWHFKQLFDO'HVLJQ
*HRWHFKQLFDO GHVLJQ VKDOO EH FRQGXFWHG LQ FRQIRUPDQFH ZLWK FXUUHQW &LW\ &DOWUDQV DQG 6&55$VWDQGDUGVGHVLJQPDQXDOVDQGUHTXLUHPHQWV
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
&RQVXOWDQW VKDOO SUHSDUH D JHRWHFKQLFDO PDWHULDOV DQG EULGJH IRXQGDWLRQ UHSRUW ZLWK LQIRUPDWLRQJDWKHUHGGXULQJWKHVLWHYLVLWDQGUHYLHZRIH[LVWLQJVXEVXUIDFHGDWDJHRWHFKQLFDO ERULQJVUHVXOWVREWDLQHGIURPWKHDOWHUQDWLYHDQDO\VLVDQGWKHSUHOLPLQDU\EULGJHDQGUHWDLQLQJ ZDOOIRXQGDWLRQGDWD
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
IRUWKHDOO
ODQHVDQGREWDLQ&LW\DQG&DOWUDQVFRQFXUUHQFH,WVKDOOEHWKHUHVSRQVLELOLW\RIWKH&RQVXOWDQW WRQRWLI\8QGHUJURXQG6HUYLFH$OHUWDQGSURYLGHWUDIILFFRQWURO&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOWLHSRVLWLRQ EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3178 5/5/2026
RIERULQJORFDWLRQVZLWKHOHYDWLRQ
7KH)RXQGDWLRQ5HSRUWVKDOODOVRLQFOXGH

x 1DWXUHRIPDWHULDOVIRXQGRQWKHVLWH
x /LTXHIDFWLRQSRWHQWLDO
x $Q\JHRORJLFDOKD]DUGVWKDWPD\H[LVWDQGUHFRPPHQGPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHV x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
x /DERUDWRU\7HVWLQJ ±%XON DQG XQGLVWXUEHG VDPSOHV VKDOO EH VHOHFWHG IRUODERUDWRU\ WHVWLQJ$OOWHVWVVKDOOEHFRQGXFWHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWK&DOWUDQV7HVW0HWKRGVRU$670 6WDQGDUGV
x (QJLQHHULQJ$QDO\VHV±5HVXOWVREWDLQHG IURPWKH ILHOGDQGODERUDWRU\LQYHVWLJDWLRQ SURJUDPVKDOOEHXVHGWRHVWDEOLVKLGHDOL]HGVRLOSURILOHVDQGGHVLJQVRLOSDUDPHWHUVIRU EULGJHIRXQGDWLRQGHVLJQ

5,*+72):$<
7KLV 3URMHFW VKDOO UHTXLUH WKH DFTXLVLWLRQ RI DGGLWLRQDO ULJKWRIZD\ &RQVXOWDQWV PXVW GHPRQVWUDWH WKH PLQLPXP TXDOLILFDWLRQV DV HVWDEOLVKHG LQ WKH &DOLIRUQLD 'HSDUWPHQW RI 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ
&DOWUDQV
5LJKW RI :D\ 0DQXDO ZKLFK FDQ EH DFFHVVHG DW

KWWS
ZZZGRWFDJRYKTURZURZPDQPDQXDOLQGH[
7KHDFTXLVLWLRQSURFHVVVKDOOEHFRQGXFWHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKDSSOLFDEOHFRGHVSURFHGXUHVDQG UHJXODWLRQV LQFOXGLQJ &DOLIRUQLD *RYHUQPHQW &RGH &RGH RI &LYLO 3URFHGXUH &DOLIRUQLD 5HORFDWLRQ$VVLVWDQFHDQGWKH8QLIRUP 5HORFDWLRQ$VVLVWDQFHDQG5HDO3URSHUW\$FTXLVLWLRQ 3ROLFLHV$FW
8QLIRUP$FW
&LW\VKDOOUHYLHZDQGDSSURYHDOOULJKWRIZD\UHODWHGZRUNDQG GHOLYHUDEOHV &RQVXOWDQWVPXVWGHPRQVWUDWHDELOLW\WRKDYHVXFFHVVIXOO\QHJRWLDWHGDQGFORVHG HVFURZ RQ DFTXLVLWLRQ RI SDUFHOV DQG PLQLPL]HG WKH HPLQHQW GRPDLQ SURFHVV RQ VLPLODU SURMHFWV
,QFRQMXQFWLRQZLWKWKH(QYLURQPHQWDO5HYLHZWKH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOGHWHUPLQHULJKWRIZD\ QHHGVDQGSUHSDUHPDSVIRUVXEPLWWDOWRWKH&LW\7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOLGHQWLI\WKHQHHGIRU QHZ ULJKWRIZD\ QHZ DFFHVV FRQWURO SHUPDQHQW HDVHPHQWV DQG WHPSRUDU\ FRQVWUXFWLRQ HDVHPHQWV7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOFRRUGLQDWHZLWKDIIHFWHGDJHQFLHVWRGHWHUPLQHULJKWRIZD\ LPSDFWV
LQFOXGLQJ XWLOLW\ ULJKWRIZD\ QHHGV
7KH &LW\ VKDOO DSSURYH ULJKWRIZD\
UHTXLUHPHQWVSULRUWRLQLWLDWLQJSUHSDUDWLRQRIULJKWRIZD\PDSV EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3179 5/5/2026
7KH &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO GUDIW DOO HVFURZ DJUHHPHQWV UHORFDWLRQ DJUHHPHQWV WHPSRUDU\ DQG SHUPDQHQWHDVHPHQWVDQGSHUIRUP&RXQW\UHFRUGDWLRQDQGDOOUHTXLUHGQRWLFHVDVVRFLDWHGZLWK WKHDFTXLVLWLRQVDQGSHUPLWV
7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOODWWHQGUHJXODUSURJUHVVPHHWLQJVDQGSURYLGHDVWDWXVXSGDWHRQSURMHFW SURJUHVVVFKHGXOHDQGDQ\FULWLFDOLVVXHVLWHPVDQGWKHIROORZXSDFWLRQLWHPVQHFHVVDU\IRU DOODFTXLVLWLRQVUHORFDWLRQVDQGSURSHUW\PDQDJHPHQWWKURXJKRXWWKHGXUDWLRQRIWKH52: SKDVH
7KHULJKWRIZD\DFTXLVLWLRQSURFHVVVKDOOLQFOXGHEXWQRWEHOLPLWHGWRWKHIROORZLQJ
$ 5LJKWRI:D\0DSV
x 7KH &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO SUHSDUH ULJKWRIZD\ EDVH PDSV LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK &DOWUDQV UHTXLUHPHQWV%DVHPDSVVKDOOVKRZH[LVWLQJIHDWXUHVFRQVLVWLQJRIORWVDORQJ6DQWD$QD %RXOHYDUG ZLWK DOO ULJKWRIZD\ DQG HDVHPHQW DUHDV DVVHVVRU¶V SDUFHO QXPEHUV DGGUHVVHVW\SHVRIEXVLQHVVHVSURSHUW\OLQHVIRRWSULQWVRIEXLOGLQJVVHWEDFNGLVWDQFHV IURPULJKWRIZD\WREXLOGLQJVYHJHWDWLRQDQGLPSURYHPHQWVLQWKHDFTXLVLWLRQDUHDV DQGH[LVWLQJGULYHZD\V
x 7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOLGHQWLI\DOOXWLOLWLHVLQFOXGLQJWKRVHWKDWKDYHSULRUULJKWV x 7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOLGHQWLI\DOOLPSURYHPHQWVLQFOXGLQJPRQXPHQWVLJQVFHOOWRZHUV EXVLQHVVVLJQVHWFWKDWVKDOOEHUHPRYHGDQGRUUHORFDWHGDVDSDUWRIWKH3URMHFW x 7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSUHSDUHULJKWRIZD\PDSVDWDVFDOHDSSURYHGE\&DOWUDQVUHIOHFWLQJ DOO ULJKWRIZD\ IRU WKH 3URMHFW LQFOXGLQJ DFTXLVLWLRQV DQG HDVHPHQWV UHTXLUHG IRU PDLQWHQDQFHDFFHVVGUDLQDJHPDWHULDOVLWHVXWLOLWLHVDQGFRQVWUXFWLRQZRUNDUHDVDV QHFHVVDU\7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOODOVRVKRZDFFHVVFRQWURO'LPHQVLRQVDUHWREHVKRZQ LQ(QJOLVKXQLWV
% $SSUDLVDO0DSV3ODWVDQG'HVFULSWLRQV
x 7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOFRRUGLQDWHZLWK&LW\¶V5LJKWRI:D\$FTXLVLWLRQ&RQVXOWDQWWR SUHSDUHOHJDOGHVFULSWLRQVSODWVGHHGVDQGPDSVIRUHDFKSDUFHODFFHSWDEOHWR&DOWUDQV DQGWKH&LW\IRUFRQYH\DQFHRIPDUNHWDEOHWLWOHLQWHUHVWVDQGIRUDFFXUDWHUHSUHVHQWDWLRQ RIULJKWRIZD\QHFHVVDU\IRUFRQVWUXFWLRQRIWKH3URMHFW x 7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSUHSDUHOHJDOGHVFULSWLRQVSODWVDQGPDSVDFFHSWDEOHWRXWLOLW\ FRPSDQLHV
DVUHTXLUHG
DQGWKH&LW\IRUFRQYH\DQFHRIPDUNHWDEOHWLWOHLQWHUHVWVDQG DFFXUDWHUHSUHVHQWDWLRQRIHDVHPHQWVQHFHVVDU\IRUFRQVWUXFWLRQRIWKH3URMHFW x 7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSUHSDUHDULJKWRIZD\PDSVDFFHSWDEOHWR&DOWUDQV x $OLFHQVHG$SSUDLVHUKLUHGE\WKH&LW\VKDOOEHUHVSRQVLEOHSUHSDUDWLRQRIDSSUDLVDOVDV UHTXLUHGE\&DOWUDQV7KHDSSURSULDWHO\OLFHQVHGDSSUDLVHUVKDOOEHXVHGIRUFHOOWRZHUV

LIDQ\
VLJQVHWF&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSURYLGHUHTXLUHGGRFXPHQWDWLRQWR&LW\¶V5LJKWRI :D\$FTXLVLWLRQ&RQVXOWDQWWRDOORZWKHPWRSUHSDUHWKHQHFHVVDU\DSSUDLVDOVIRUDQ\ SURSHUW\UHTXLUHGIRUWKH3URMHFW
x $Q H[SHULHQFHG 5LJKWRI:D\ $FTXLVLWLRQ &RQVXOWDQW KLUHG E\ WKH &LW\ VKDOO EH UHVSRQVLEOHIRUULJKWRIZD\QHJRWLDWLRQVDQGFRRUGLQDWLRQZLWK&LW\UHSUHVHQWDWLYHV x $Q H[SHULHQFHG5HORFDWLRQ&RQVXOWDQW KLUHG E\WKH&LW\ VKDOO EH UHVSRQVLEOH IRU DOO HIIRUW DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK UHORFDWLRQV QHJRWLDWLRQV DQG FRRUGLQDWLRQ ZLWK &LW\ EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3180 5/5/2026
UHSUHVHQWDWLYHV
x 7KH &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO SUHSDUH QHFHVVDU\ &DOWUDQV /RFDO $VVLVWDQFH 3DSHUZRUN DVVRFLDWHGZLWKXWLOLW\UHORFDWLRQV
& $SSUDLVDO6HUYLFHV
&RQVXOWDQW VKDOO SUHSDUH DSSUDLVDO VHUYLFHV WKDW LQFOXGH IXOO DQG SDUWLDO DFTXLVLWLRQ IRU FRPPHUFLDOSURSHUW\
LQGXVWULDOSURSHUW\
HDVHPHQWV
VSHFLDOXVHRU]RQHGSURSHUW\
DQG
UHYLHZDSSUDLVDOV$SSUDLVDO6HUYLFHVVKDOOEHLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKIHGHUDOVWDWHDQGORFDO UHJXODWLRQVSROLFLHVSURFHGXUHVDQGVWDQGDUGV&RQVXOWDQWPXVWPDNHHYHU\HIIRUWWRPHHW ZLWKWKHSURSHUW\RZQHUSULRUWRSUHSDUDWLRQRIWKHUHSRUW ' $FTXLVLWLRQ 5HORFDWLRQ6HUYLFHV
7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOFRRUGLQDWHDOOWKHYDULRXVDVSHFWVRIWKHUHDOSURSHUW\DFTXLVLWLRQDQG UHORFDWLRQ SURFHVV HQVXULQJ DOO ZRUN ZLOO EH SHUIRUPHG LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK WKH SXEOLF DJHQF\¶VSROLFLHVDQGSURFHGXUHVDQGIHGHUDOVWDWHDQGORFDOUHJXODWLRQV $OO DFTXLVLWLRQUHORFDWLRQ DJHQWV SHUIRUPLQJ ZRUN IRU WKH &LW\ PXVW KROG D YDOLG &DOLIRUQLD 5HDO (VWDWH /LFHQVH 6DOHVSHUVRQV PXVW EH UHJLVWHUHG ZLWK WKH &DOLIRUQLD 'HSDUWPHQWRI5HDO(VWDWH
'5(
DVZRUNLQJVROHO\XQGHUWKH&RQVXOWDQW¶VVXSHUYLVLQJ EURNHURIUHFRUG
&RQVXOWDQW VKDOO SURYLGH D FRPSOHWH UHORFDWLRQ DVVLVWDQFH SURJUDP WR FRPSO\ ZLWK WKH 8QLIRUP $FW RU 7LWOH &DOLIRUQLD &RGH RI 5HJXODWLRQV LWV DPHQGPHQWV DQG RWKHU SHUWLQHQWODZV DQG UHJXODWLRQV 7KLV VFRSHLQFOXGHVWKH SUHSDUDWLRQ RI UHORFDWLRQ SODQV UHORFDWLRQJXLGHOLQHVUHORFDWLRQFRVWHVWLPDWHVSURMHFWDUHDVXUYH\VDQGRWKHUVSHFLDOL]HG UHSRUWV
( 3URSHUW\0DQDJHPHQW6HUYLFHV
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
&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOHVWDEOLVKDVHSDUDWHFKHFNLQJDFFRXQWLQWKHQDPHRI&LW\DQG&RQVXOWDQW ZLWKWKH&LW\WREHFRRZQHURIWKHDFFRXQWDQGKDYHIXOODFFHVVDWDEDQNDSSURYHGE\ &LW\DQGFRQIRUPLQJZLWKDOO&LW\SROLFLHVDQGSURFHGXUHV ) )XUQLWXUH)L[WXUHV0DFKLQHU\ (TXLSPHQW
))0(
$SSUDLVDO6HUYLFHV
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3181 5/5/2026
&RQVXOWDQW VKDOO FRPSOHWH ZRUN XQGHU WKH GLUHFWLRQ RI &LW\ VWDII &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO WKURXJKRXWWKHOLIHRIWKH$JUHHPHQW UHWDLQZLWKLQ&RQVXOWDQW¶V ILUPDVWDIIRITXDOLILHG SHUVRQQHOWRSHUIRUPHDFKRIWKHZRUNOLVWHGEHORZ&RQVXOWDQWVVKDOOEHUHVSRQVLYHDQG PDLQWDLQ H[FHOOHQW ZRUNLQJ UHODWLRQVKLSV ZLWK SURSHUW\ RZQHUVWHQDQWV DQG &LW\ VWDII &RQVXOWDQWVKDOOEHFRPPLWWHGWRSURYLGHDGHTXDWHVWDIILQJOHYHOVDWDOOWLPHVLQRUGHUWR DGKHUHWRHVWDEOLVKHGVFKHGXOHV&RQVXOWDQWVVKDOOEHNQRZOHGJHDEOHDQGYHU\IDPLOLDUZLWK IHGHUDOVWDWHDQGORFDOUHJXODWLRQVSROLFLHVDQGSURFHGXUHVDVSHUWDLQWRWKHULJKWRIZD\ VHUYLFHVSURYLGHG
* %XVLQHVV*RRGZLOO$SSUDLVDO6HUYLFHV
&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSHUIRUPSURIHVVLRQDODQGWHFKQLFDO/RVVRI*RRGZLOO$SSUDLVDOVHUYLFHV RQDQDVQHHGHGEDVLVWRSUHSDUHUHSRUWVIRUXVHGXULQJ52:QHJRWLDWLRQVIRUWKHSURMHFW DQGVHWWOHPHQWGXULQJFRQGHPQDWLRQSURFHHGLQJV7KH/RVVRI*RRGZLOOUHSRUWVDUHWREH SUHSDUHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKDOODSSOLFDEOHUHJXODWLRQVDVGHWHUPLQHGE\WKH&LW\7KHVH PD\LQFOXGHEXWDUHQRWOLPLWHGWRORFDOVWDWHDQGIHGHUDOUHJXODWLRQVSROLFLHVSURFHGXUHV PDQXDOVDQGVWDQGDUGVLQFOXGLQJ
87,/,7<&225',1$7,21 5(/2&$7,21
7KLV WDVN LQYROYHV WKH FROOHFWLRQ DVVHPEO\ DQG PDSSLQJ RI H[LVWLQJ RYHUKHDG DQG XQGHUJURXQGXWLOLW\OLQHVZLWKLQWKHSURMHFWOLPLWV 3HUIRUPQHFHVVDU\UHVHDUFKWRLGHQWLI\DOO H[LVWLQJXWLOLWLHVDQGSRWHQWLDOFRQIOLFWV3RWKROHH[LVWLQJXWLOLWLHVWRYHULI\GHSWKDQGORFDWLRQ 3URYLGHDOOUHTXLUHGWUDIILFFRQWURODQGVXUIDFHUHSDLUQHFHVVDU\IRUSRWKROLQJZRUN 7KHLQWHQWRIWKH&LW\LVWKDWWKHVHUYLFHVRIWKH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOEHFRPSOHWHDQG³WXUQNH\´ ZLWK UHVSHFWV WR DOO XWLOLW\ FRRUGLQDWLRQ PDWWHUV LQFOXGLQJ FRPSOHWH FRRUGLQDWLRQ IRU WKH SURWHFWLRQ DQG UHORFDWLRQ RI H[LVWLQJ IDFLOLWLHV DV GHVFULEHG KHUHLQ DVZHOO DV FRRUGLQDWLRQ SUHSDUDWLRQRIDSSOLFDWLRQVDQGDOORWKHUPDWWHUVSHUWDLQLQJWRWKHUHORFDWLRQDQGLQVWDOODWLRQRI ZDWHUDQGHOHFWULFVHUYLFHVH[FHSWIRUWKRVHSURFHGXUHVWKDWPXVWEHSHUIRUPHGE\&LW\ 7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOGHWHUPLQHWKHRZQHUVKLSULJKWV
XWLOLWLHVLQWKHLURZQHDVHPHQWRUXWLOLWLHV
LQE\&LW\IUDQFKLVHDJUHHPHQW
RIXWLOLWLHVDIIHFWHGE\SURMHFWFRQVWUXFWLRQDQGVKDOOFRRUGLQDWH DQGQRWLI\WKH&LW\LIDQ\FRVWVDUHWREHSDLGE\WKH&LW\IRUXWLOLW\UHORFDWLRQVHDUO\LQWKH GHVLJQSURFHVV
&RQVXOWDQW VKDOO GHVLJQDWH H[SHULHQFHG GHGLFDWHG VWDII ZKR VKDOO EH UHVSRQVLEOH IRU DOO FRRUGLQDWLRQZRUN UHODWHGWRXWLOLWLHV IRU3URMHFWLQFOXGLQJEXWQRWOLPLWHGWR UHORFDWLRQVRI H[LVWLQJ WUXQN DQG PDLQOLQH IDFLOLWLHV LQVWDOODWLRQ RI QHZ WUXQN DQG PDLQOLQH IDFLOLWLHV UHORFDWLRQ RI H[LVWLQJ VHZHU GUDLQDJH FRPPXQLFDWLRQ HOHFWULF DQG ZDWHU VHUYLFHV DQG LQVWDOODWLRQRIQHZVHUYLFHV
&RQVXOWDQW VKDOO FRRUGLQDWH ZLWK XWLOLW\ RZQHUV DQG &LW\ ZLWK UHVSHFW WR DOO XWLOLW\ UHODWHG PDWWHUV&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSURYLGHFRSLHVRIDOOFRUUHVSRQGHQFHZLWKXWLOLW\FRPSDQLHVDQGRWKHU XWLOLW\UHODWHGLQIRUPDWLRQWRWKH&LW\&RUUHVSRQGHQFHDVGHVFULEHGKHUHLQVKDOOEHSUHSDUHG E\&RQVXOWDQWIRUHLWKHU&RQVXOWDQWRU&LW\VLJQDWXUHDVDSSURSULDWHDQGDVGLUHFWHG E\ WKH &LW\¶V3URMHFW0DQDJHU
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3182 5/5/2026
&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOFRRUGLQDWHZLWK&LW\VWDIIWRREWDLQUHFRUGFRSLHVRIXWLOLW\PDSVIURPHDFK XWLOLW\RZQHUZLWKLQWKHSURMHFWOLPLWVIRUH[LVWLQJDQGRUSURSRVHGXWLOLW\IDFLOLWLHV&RQVXOWDQW VKDOOLQFOXGHPDSSLQJDQGRUH[KLELWVWKDWFOHDUO\GHILQHWKHSURMHFWOLPLWVDVSDUWRIWKHUHTXHVWV IRUXWLOLW\LQIRUPDWLRQ&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOLGHQWLI\XWLOLW\FRPSDQLHVDIIHFWHGE\WKHSURMHFWDQG GHOLQHDWHXWLOLWLHVZLWKLQWKHSURMHFW¶VVSKHUHRILQIOXHQFHRQWKHSODQV&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSUHSDUH SUHOLPLQDU\SODQVZKLFKVKDOOLQFOXGHDOOH[LVWLQJXWLOLWLHV DERYHJURXQGDQGEHORZJURXQG

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¶VVXUYH\FRQWUROV .QRZQXWLOLW\FRQIOLFWVVKDOOEHVKRZQRQWKHSODQVZLWKFRQVWUXFWLRQQRWHVLQGLFDWLQJDFWLRQWR EHWDNHQDQGE\ZKRP,QYHQWRU\QXPEHUVRISROHVYDXOWVDQGRWKHUVXUIDFHIDFLOLWLHVVKDOOEH VKRZQRQWKHSODQVIRUWKRVHIDFLOLWLHVWKDWKDYHVXFKQXPEHUVDWWDFKHGWRWKHIDFLOLW\DQGDV SURYLGHGRQWKHRZQHU¶VLQYHQWRU\PDSV
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
$XWLOLW\PDWUL[VKDOOEHSUHSDUHGOLVWLQJWKHIDFLOLW\W\SHFRQVWUXFWLRQPDWHULDOORFDWLRQGHSWK DQG GLVSRVLWLRQ RI XWLOLWLHV ZLWKLQWKH SURMHFWOLPLWV&RQVXOWDQW VKDOOWLH SRVLWLRQ RI ERULQJ ORFDWLRQVZLWKHOHYDWLRQ
&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOPRQLWRUUHVSRQVHVRIXWLOLW\QRWLFHVUHFHLYHGDQGPDNHUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVIRU PLWLJDWLQJFRQIOLFWV&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSURYLGHZULWWHQUHVSRQVHVWRXWLOLW\FRPSDQLHVZLWKUHJDUG WRVWDWHGFRQFHUQVDQGFRQGXFWGHVLJQFRRUGLQDWLRQPHHWLQJVZLWKXWLOLW\FRPSDQLHVDVQHHGHG 8QUHVROYHGLVVXHVVKDOOEHEURXJKWWRWKHDWWHQWLRQRIWKH&LW\¶V3URMHFW0DQDJHUDVHDUO\DV SUDFWLFDO
8WLOLW\FRQIOLFWLVVXHV VKDOO EH UHVROYHG SULRUWRWKHFRPSOHWLRQ RIWKH ILQDO GHVLJQ SODQVDV

IROORZV

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3183 5/5/2026
x &RQVXOWDQWWKURXJK&LW\VWDIIVKDOOUHTXHVWDQGREWDLQDZULWWHQDFNQRZOHGJHPHQWRI DQ\FRQIOLFWVIURPWKHUHVSHFWLYHXWLOLW\RZQHUV
x 5HDVRQDEOHHIIRUWVVKDOOEHWDNHQWRDFFRPPRGDWHXWLOLW\FRPSDQ\UHTXHVWVIRUPLQRU GHVLJQFKDQJHVWRDFFRPPRGDWHWKHLUIDFLOLWLHV&RQVXOWDQWXQGHUVWDQGVWKDWWKHXWLOLW\ FRPSDQLHV DUH JHQHUDOO\ RSHUDWLQJ ZLWKLQ WKH &LW\ ULJKWRIZD\EXW PD\ KDYH SULRU ULJKWVWRWKDWRIWKH&LW\LQVRPHFDVHV
x &RQVXOWDQWWKURXJK &LW\ VWDII VKDOOLVVXH PLGGHVLJQOHWWHUVZLWK SODQV ZKLFK UHTXHVWVXWLOLW\RZQHUWRLQLWLDWHUHORFDWLRQHQJLQHHULQJIXQGLQJSURSHUW\ULJKWVFKHFNV HWF
x &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO PRQLWRU HDFK XWLOLW\ RZQHU WKDW KDV FRQIOLFWLQJ IDFLOLWLHV DQG VKDOO REWDLQUHORFDWLRQSODQVDQGRWKHUUHOHYDQWLQIRUPDWLRQIURPXWLOLW\RZQHU&RQVXOWDQW VKDOOUHYLHZUHORFDWLRQSODQVIRUFRQIRUPDQFHZLWKWKHUHTXLUHPHQWVRIWKHSURMHFW x &RQVXOWDQWVKDOOFRRUGLQDWHLQFOXVLRQRIVSHFLDOSURYLVLRQVLQ&LW\¶VELGGRFXPHQWVIRU DGMXVWPHQWVDQGUHORFDWLRQVRIXWLOLW\IDFLOLWLHVDVDOWHUQDWHELGLWHPVLIUHTXHVWHGE\WKH RZQLQJXWLOLW\6DLGZRUNPD\UHTXLUHWKDWFRRSHUDWLYHDJUHHPHQWVEHSUHSDUHGE\&LW\ EHWZHHQWKH&LW\DQGWKHRZQLQJXWLOLW\FRPSDQLHV(QJLQHHUVKDOOSURYLGHLQIRUPDWLRQ DQGH[KLELWVDVUHTXLUHGWRVXSSRUWWKHSUHSDUDWLRQRIFRRSHUDWLYHDJUHHPHQWVLIQHHGHG x &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO FRQGXFW XWLOLW\ FRRUGLQDWLRQ PHHWLQJV DV QHHGHG UHJDUGLQJ DGMXVWPHQWVDQGUHORFDWLRQVWRUHVROYHFRQIOLFWLVVXHV x )RU XWLOLW\ FRQIOLFWVWKDW UHTXLUH UHORFDWLQJ&RQVXOWDQW VWDII VKDOO VXEPLWWKH RIILFLDO QRWLFHRUGHUWRWKHXWLOLW\FRPSDQLHVWRUHORFDWHFRQIOLFWLQJIDFLOLWLHV x &RQVXOWDQWVKDOOPDNHUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVIRUVSHFLDOSURYLVLRQODQJXDJHZLWKUHJDUGWR XWLOLW\LVVXHVUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVIRUFRQVWUXFWLRQZLQGRZVRIWLPHIRUXWLOLW\UHORFDWLRQ DFWLYLWLHVUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVIRULQFOXVLRQRIXWLOLW\ELGLWHPVHWF x )RUXWLOLW\FRQIOLFWVZLWK&LW\RZQHGZDWHUVHZHUUHFODLPHGSLSHOLQHVHOHFWULFDO)LEHU 2SWLFOLQHV6LJQDOHOHFWULFDORU VWRUPGUDLQWKDW UHTXLUH UHORFDWLQJ&RQVXOWDQW VKDOO SUHSDUHWKHUHTXLUHGUHORFDWLRQSODQVRUQHZLQVWDOODWLRQSODQVDVQHFHVVDU\WRSURYLGH ELGGDEOH3ODQVDQG6SHFLILFDWLRQV
WXUQNH\VHUYLFH
&LW\VWDIIVKDOOVXEPLWWKHRIILFLDO
QRWLFHRUGHUWRWKHXWLOLW\FRPSDQLHVWRUHORFDWHFRQIOLFWLQJIDFLOLWLHV x )RUXWLOLW\FRQIOLFWVRULPSURYHPHQWVZLWKLQSURSHUWLHVWKDWVKDOOEHDIIHFWHGZLWKWKH 3URMHFW WKH &RQVXOWDQW LV UHVSRQVLEOH WR SUHSDUH WKH QHHGHG SODQV IRU UHORFDWLRQ RU GHPROLWLRQV DQG UHHVWDEOLVKPHQW
VXFK DV LUULJDWLRQ ODQGVFDSH HOHFWULFDO VHUYLFHV OLJKWLQJJDVVHUYLFHVFRPPXQLFDWLRQHWF
&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOORFDWHDQGWLHDQ\IHDWXUHV
WKDWZRXOGDIIHFWWKHGHVLJQRUFRQVWUXFWLRQ
75$)),&0$1$*(0(173/$1
$7UDIILF0DQDJHPHQW3ODQ
703
VKDOOEHGHYHORSHGZLWKWKHREMHFWLYHWRSURYLGHFRQWLQXRXV WUDIILFFLUFXODWLRQDQGDFFHVVZLWKDGHTXDWHVSDFHIRUVDIHDQGHIILFLHQWFRQVWUXFWLRQ7KH703 ZLOOEHFRRUGLQDWHGZLWKSURMHFWVWDNHKROGHUVWRLQFOXGHEXWQRWEHOLPLWHGWR
x 2UDQJH&RXQW\7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ$XWKRULW\
2&7$

x 6RXWKHUQ&DOLIRUQLD5HJLRQDO5DLO$XWKRULW\
6&55$

x &DOLIRUQLD3XEOLF8WLOLWLHV&RPPLVVLRQ
&38&

x &DOLIRUQLD'HSDUWPHQWRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ
&DOWUDQV

x %XVLQHVVHV
x /RFDOQHLJKERUKRRGDVVRFLDWLRQVDQG
x 2WKHUSXEOLFRUSULYDWHDJHQFLHVXWLOLWLHVRUSDUWLHV EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3184 5/5/2026
7KHGHYHORSPHQWRIWKHVWDJHGFRQVWUXFWLRQDQGWUDIILFGHWRXUVFORVXUHVRUDOWHUDWLRQVWRWUDIILF SDWWHUQVZLOOEHLQFOXGHG7KHSODQPXVWGHWDLOWKHXVHRIWHPSRUDU\WUDIILFFRQWUROGHYLFHV VXFK DV FRQHV GUXPV EDUULFDGHV DQG VLJQV DOO RIZKLFKPXVW FRPSO\ZLWKWKH&DOLIRUQLD 087&'$Q\WHPSRUDU\URDGZD\PXVWEHHQJLQHHUHGWRWKHVDPHGHVLJQVWDQGDUGVDVQHZ FRQVWUXFWLRQLQFOXGLQJDOLJQPHQWSDYHPHQWPDUNLQJVDQGSHGHVWULDQELF\FOHIDFLOLWLHV 7KH703VKDOOEHGHYHORSHGDFFRUGLQJWR&DOWUDQV703*XLGHOLQHV703VWUDWHJLHVLQFOXGH
x 3URMHFW'HVFULSWLRQ
x 3XEOLF,QIRUPDWLRQ
x 0RWRULVW,QIRUPDWLRQ
x ,QFLGHQW0DQDJHPHQW
x &RQVWUXFWLRQ6WUDWHJLHV
x 'HPDQG0DQDJHPHQW
x $OWHUQDWH5RXWHV
RU'HWRXUV

x /D\RXW6KHHWV
x 7\SLFDO&URVV6HFWLRQV
x 3URMHFW6FKHGXOH
$OWKRXJKWKH703 VKDOO EH SUHSDUHG SHU&DOWUDQV JXLGHOLQHVLWLVDQWLFLSDWHGWKDW&DOWUDQV UHYLHZDQGDSSURYDORIWKH703VKDOOEHOLPLWHGWRSRUWLRQVLPSDFWLQJWKHLUULJKWRIZD\RQO\ $*5((0(176 3(50,76
7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSURYLGHWHFKQLFDOVXSSRUWWRGUDIWDQGSUHSDUHFRRSHUDWLYHDJUHHPHQWV FRQVWUXFWLRQDQGPDLQWHQDQFH
& 0
DJUHHPHQWV&38&DSSURYDOVDQGDOOQRWLFLQJUHTXLUHG IRU WKH SURMHFW 7KH &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO SURYLGH WHFKQLFDO VXSSRUW DQG SUHSDUH QHFHVVDU\ GRFXPHQWV IRUWKH&LW\DV UHTXLUHG IRU REWDLQLQJDOO SHUPLWV QHHGHG IRUFRQVWUXFWLRQ RIWKH 3URMHFW
&RQVXOWDQWVKDOORQEHKDOIRIWKH&LW\LGHQWLI\SUHSDUHDSSOLFDWLRQVIRUDQGDVVLVWLQREWDLQLQJ WKH SHUPLWV FOHDUDQFHV DQG DJUHHPHQWV UHTXLUHG E\ 2&7$ 6&55$&38&&DOWUDQV DQG RWKHUSXEOLFRUSULYDWHDJHQFLHVXWLOLWLHVRUSDUWLHVIRUFRQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHSURSRVHGIDFLOLWLHV 7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOVXEPLWSHUPLWDSSOLFDWLRQVDVDSSOLFDEOH DWWHQGDQGRUJDQL]HPHHWLQJV

UHYLVHHGLWDQGUHVXEPLWSHUPLWDSSOLFDWLRQVSODQVDQGH[KLELWVDVQHHGHG DQGIROORZXSZLWK
WKHDJHQFLHVDVQHHGHGWRDVVLVWWKH&LW\LQVHFXULQJDOOUHTXLUHGSHUPLWV7KH&LW\VKDOOSD\DOO DSSOLFDWLRQDQGSHUPLWIHHVWKURXJKWKH&RQVXOWDQWDVSDUWRIWKHDJUHHPHQW &216758&7,216833257
&RQVXOWDQWVKDOODVVLVWWKH&LW\GXULQJWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHSURMHFWE\SHUIRUPLQJWKH LWHPVEHORZ

D (QJLQHHULQJ6XSSRUW±$VVLVWWKH&LW\ZLWKWKHIROORZLQJ
L 3URYLGHSURIHVVLRQDOHQJLQHHULQJVHUYLFHVWRDGGUHVVDQGUHVSRQGWR5HTXHVWVIRU ,QIRUPDWLRQ
5),¶V
IURPWKHFRQWUDFWRU
LL 5HYLHZVKRSGUDZLQJDQGPDWHULDOVVXEPLWWDOV
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3185 5/5/2026
LLL 3UHSDUH VXSSOHPHQWDU\ VNHWFKHV DQG GHWDLOV DV UHTXLUHG WR UHVROYH ILHOG FRQVWUXFWLRQSUREOHPVWKDWPD\EHHQFRXQWHUHG
LY 5HYLHZ DQG SURYLGH UHFRPPHQGDWLRQV UHJDUGLQJ SURSRVHG FKDQJH RUGHUV DV QHHGHG
E 3UHSDUDWLRQRI5HFRUG'RFXPHQWV
$V%XLOWV

7KHFRQVWUXFWLRQFRQWUDFWVKDOOUHTXLUHWKHFRQWUDFWRUWRSURYLGHWRWKH&LW\IRUUHYLHZ DQGDSSURYDO RQH VHW RIDVEXLOW SODQV VKRZLQJWKH GHVLJQFKDQJHVPDGH GXULQJWKH FRXUVHRIFRQVWUXFWLRQ&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOSUHSDUHUHFRUGGUDZLQJVIURPFRQWUDFWRUDQG FRQVWUXFWLRQ LQVSHFWRU DVEXLOW GUDZLQJ PDUNXSV DQG ILHOG QRWHV 6XEPLW WKH

IROORZLQJ

L 2QH

HOHFWURQLF VXEPLWWDOZLWKWKH UHFRUG GUDZLQJ ILOHV VDYHGLQ$XWR&$' ':*RU0LFUR6WDWLRQ&RQQHFW'*1DQG3')IRUPDWV 237,21$/6(59,&(6
&RQVXOWDQW VKDOO SURYLGH VHSDUDWH OLQH LWHPV LQ WKH FRVW SURSRVDO IRU WKH ³2SWLRQDO 6HUYLFHV´&LW\PD\H[FOXGHRULQFOXGHWKHRSWLRQDOVHUYLFHVDVSDUWRIWKHDZDUGHGFRQWUDFW DW&LW\¶VGLVFUHWLRQ7KH³2SWLRQDO6HUYLFHV´VKDOOLQFOXGHWKHIROORZLQJDFWLYLWLHV
D &RQVWUXFWLRQ6WDNLQJ
ď͘ 2WKHURSWLRQDOVHUYLFHDVGHWHUPLQHGE\&RQVXOWDQW
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3186 5/5/2026

EXHIBIT B

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3187 5/5/2026
March 13, 2026
Jason Gabriel, PE
CIP Engineering Manager
City of Santa Ana – Public Works Agency
20 Civic Center Plaza, M-36
Santa Ana, CA 92701
RE: Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation – Cost Proposal Revision 1 (Final Design) Dear Mr. Gabriel:

Thank you again for selecting us as the top-rated firm for the grade separation. Based on your email communication and discussions, we are resubmitting our Cost Proposal specific to the final design elements of the contract. We will follow up with you separately on the details related to right-of-way acquisition efforts.

For the final design efforts, we revisited our assumptions and reviewed project elements in more detail in order to refine the levels of effort. Additionally, we refined our approach to certain items which account for the larger reductions in efforts, as described below.

1. Metrolink Rail Bridge – Our approach with Metrolink is to conduct a workshop(s) soon after the notice-to-proceed is received in order to gain concurrence on the approach to the bridge staging concepts. This decision will be driven by Metrolink’s approval of a Limited Work Window (30 day track closure) or only allowing Absolute Work Windows (full weekend closures). That decision will dictate the bridge type, therefore the Bridge Type Selection document will only focus on a single structure type that works for the staging concept.

2. Pedestrian Bridge – We have determined that the most cost-effective approach is a twospan prefabricated structure. The aesthetics for the abutment and bents will be consistent with the rail bridge aesthetics. Similarly, the railing on the rail bridge can also designed to mimic the pedestrian bridge.

3. Canopy Design – The submitted effort included an entry structure, similar to the existing condition adjacent to Santa Ana Boulevard. With the proximity of the pedestrian bridge, we believe a cut and reface of the canopy structure will be appropriate without the entry structure. The plans for this will be prepared for building department plan check.

4. Caltrans – In evaluating the extent of work, we are confident that we will not have any design exceptions within their right of way and will avoid the need to modify their traffic signal. These two tasks have been shifted to the Optional Tasks in case conditions change in the future.

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3188 5/5/2026
PAGE 2 OF 2

5. Utility Agreements – From our analysis, it appears that all utilities are City owned (sewer and water) or in franchise. As such, utility agreements will not be required as there is not cost sharing required. This effort has been moved to Optional Tasks.

6. Potholing – In reviewing the existing and potential relocation needs of the utilities, we are confident that 30 potholes will suffice for the project, a reduction from the submitted 40 potholes. Please note this effort was shifted from Task 3 to Task 2, coupling it with the utility coordination and subsurface utility investigation tasks.

A summary of our revised cost proposal includes:

Final Design $6,053,463 TIRCP Grant Funding
Right of Way Services $964,247 Unchanged
Construction Support $891,333 Unchanged
Optional Tasks $417,855 Contingency Items
The detailed cost proposal is attached. If the proposed changes as noted hereon are acceptable to the City, we will submit a revised scope of services which align with these changes.

We thank you for your consideration and look forward to further discussing our scope and cost proposal in detail with you. If you have any questions about our proposal, please contact me at [email protected] or (714) 815-5222.

Sincerely,
MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC.

Pat Somerville, PE
Associate Principal + Division Manager/Project Manager
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3189 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
1 Task 1 Project Administration

1.1 Project Management & Administration
Mark Thomas will be responsible for the daily
management and administration of the project,
including subconsultants.

1.2 Project Management Plan (PMP)/Quality
Management Plan (QMP)
This task will include the preparation of a Projectspecific Project Management Plan (PMP) to the City for review and concurrence within one month
of receiving Notice to Proceed and will be reviewed
at the first PDT meeting. At a minimum, the PMP
will include:
The final scope of services
Communication plan between Mark
Thomas, City and other third-party
stakeholders.
Deliverables List consistent with the scope
of services including dates submitted by
Mark Thomas and approved by the City (or
approving agency).
Baseline Schedule using Microsoft Project
and in a Critical Path Method (CPM)
format.
CADD Procedures consistent with the City
CADD Users Manual
Approved Invoicing Instructions.
List of Applicable Design Standards and
Guidelines to be utilized in the project.
General Prevailing Wage Determinations
for applicable classifications and services.

Mark Thomas will prepare, implement and
maintain a Project-specific Quality Management
System (QMS) Manual throughout the services for
this scope of work. The QMS Manual will be
updated as necessary to include additional
measures and processes throughout the life of the
project to minimize or eliminate errors and
omissions. Mark Thomas will submit the Projectspecific QMS Manual for review and concurrence within one month of receiving Notice to Proceed.

Training will be provided, as necessary, with Mark
Thomas staff and sub-consultants staff responsible
for implementing the QMS Manual.

1.3 Project Meetings
Mark Thomas will lead Project Development Team
(PDT) meetings throughout the Environmental,
Right of Way, and Plans/Specifications/Estimate
(PSE) phases of the Project. PDT meetings will
include representatives from the City and other
stakeholders as appropriate and as requested by
the City. This task includes preparation of
agendas, meeting minutes within seven (7) days of
the meeting date, log of action items, data request
log, and design decision log. Current copies of the
Baseline Schedule, Deliverables List and Risk
Register will be distributed and reviewed during
PDT meetings. Assumed number of meetings is
twenty-four (24).

1.4 Progress Reporting
Mark Thomas will prepare monthly invoices for the
Project by task number and milestone. This will
include direct labor, other direct costs, and subconsultant costs. These will include progress reports in accordance with the City guidelines
corresponding to task number and milestones.

Updated schedule will be included with the monthly
progress reports.

1.5 Schedule
A detailed baseline schedule will be prepared in
MS Project for the design phase of the project for
City review and approval. The schedule will be
updated on a monthly basis.

1.6 Risk Assessment
Risk Register identifying risk, quantifying time and
cost impacts, risk owner, risk mitigation plan, due
and completion dates for risk mitigation
Task 1 Deliverables:
Draft and Final PMP & QMP
Meeting Agendas, Minutes & Exhibits
Progress Reports
Baseline Schedule and Monthly Updates
Risk Matrix
Task 1 Assumptions:
The basis for the scope of services is a 24
month period for the final design, excluding
bid and construction support.

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3190 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
2 Task 2 Data Collection
Provide the necessary research and field activity to
establish the project baseline conditions. Our inhouse SUE services will benefit the utility locating on-site, supplemented by potholing.

2.1 Records Research
Mark Thomas will field walk site and inventory
visible utility, topography, drainage, and other
notable features. Research will include City
roadway, drainage, utility record maps and as-built
improvement plans as well as information found
from the County of Orange, OCTA and Metrolink.

This information will be organized and compiled
into a Records Research Package.

Additionally, Mark Thomas will generate field
notes, a 360-Degree Photograph Log with GIS
mapping link, and project control report.

Deliverables
Field notes
Listing of found record documents and asbuilts
Photo log and link to online 360-degree
photographs

2.2 Right of Way Mapping (Landnet)
Mark Thomas will perform research at the County
of Orange to obtain available record mapping such
as Tract Maps, Parcel Maps, Records of Surveys,
Corner Records and Tie Notes, as well as
available As-Built maps, showing street and alley
centerlines as well as rights of way. Mark Thomas
will review and analyze the property records,
easements, corner records, record maps,
centerline ties, and as-built information obtained.

Mark Thomas to acquire up to twenty (20)
Preliminary Title Reports (PTR) for further
boundary analysis and plotting of existing
easements as shown in said PTRs. Mark Thomas
to prepare preliminary right of way basemap based
on GIS and calculated record data.

Field crews will recover or re-establish a sufficient
number of survey monuments to plot centerlines
and right-of-way lines from record information.

Mark Thomas will deploy field crews to locate
appropriate centerline, right of way, and property
corner monumentation within the Project Limits
and retracement area generally shown in Figure 1.

We estimate locating up to forty (40) monuments
or centerline tie references for this effort. Mark
Thomas will then delineate the street centerline
and rights of way, and the railroad centerline and
right of way, to approximately 200’ feet outside the
Project Area as shown in Figure 1.

All results will be depicted in a LandNet Base Map
and distributed to the project team to be used as
the basis of existing street centerlines, rights of
way, easements and property lines used in all
property acquisition efforts.

Deliverables
Maximum of twenty (20) Preliminary Title
Reports
Points file and field notes of found
monumentation and ties
Right-of-Way Basemap LandNet file in
AutoCAD, PDF formats

2.3 Initial Utility Coordination
Initial Utility Coordination Using CivilGrid, Mark
Thomas will submit “A” Letters to utility companies
to notify them of the proposed project and request
as-builts and record maps. The city or county
owned utilities will be entered into a spreadsheet
(utility matrix) along with the private utilities, and
street or public works improvement plans will be
requested (if applicable). Mark Thomas will
compile a master list of the potential private and
public utilities that may be affected by the
proposed Project area in the utility matrix to track
the status of record requests. The matrix will
identify the potential utilities, the contact
information, critical dates, and correspondence.

The history of requests and the records received
shall be entered into the utility matrix.

Mark Thomas will organize the as-builts and utility
records received in response to the documented
requests tracked by the utility matrix. Mark
Thomas makes up to three attempts to contact
each utility during the project duration and the log
of correspondence along with a lack of response
will be noted in the utility matrix.

Based on the proposed project layout, utility
information, mapping and SUE identification,
potholing will be provided up to an assumed thirty
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3191 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
3 (30) potholes at relocation tie-ins and areas of
potential vertical conflict with the proposed
improvements. Potholes will provide traffic control
per WATCH Manual.

Task Deliverables
Utility Matrix summarizing research source
and findings
Utility Mapping
Utility Potholing Log & Survey

2.3 Subsurface Utility (SUE) Investigations
Mark Thomas will conduct utility detection and
marking services to provide Subsurface Utility
Engineering (SUE) Quality Level B (QL-B) surface
markings for underground utilities that shall be
derived from electromagnetic induction and GPR
readings. Findings will be documented in the field
using Paint, Flags, and/or whiskers.

A rodder will be used to trace out the Sewer/Storm
lines if unable to be seen with GPR. Utilities will be
marked in Pink, identifying them as survey marking
and dotted in USA color code. Depths will be
added on ground wherever possible, depending on
signal received by the EM locator or GPR. Any
issues will be reported to the client and
documented in the report. Upon completion of the
SUE efforts, the utility markings will be surveyed
and included in our utility mapping effort.

This information will be cross-checked with the
information received from the utility owners to
ensure the existing utility lines are shown in their
proper locations. It is assumed there will be no
more than three (3) field mobilizations for this task.

Mark Thomas to provide existing utility base map
for all existing underground and overhead utilities,
based on utility data collected from document
research, surveyed locations of surface utilities,
and USA dig alert markings. Utility base map shall
be incorporated into the project survey file.

Task Deliverables
Underground Utility Locating Report and
Daily Log(s) in PDF format
Task 3 Coordination
Mark Thomas will lead the overall coordination
efforts with the project stakeholders and
community, including in-house generated graphics
for the community engagement.

3.1 City Departments
Coordination will be provided with various City
departments, outside of Public Work, for the
project. This may include the City Manager’s office,
City Commissions or Council meetings and
briefings, and the Building Department plan check
process for the pump station and/or
remodel/refacing of the SARTC pedestrian
entrance and canopy, as needed.

3.2 SCRRA/Metrolink
Provide SCRRA/Metrolink coordination, permitting
interface support, and railroad requirements
confirmation for the project.

Coordinate SCRRA review cycles and comment
resolution related to track restoration and railroad
modifications.

Coordinate railroad constraints and operational
considerations that affect design development and
construction staging.

Provide SCRRA interface support for all railroadrelated submittals and approvals.

3.3 CPUC
Provide coordination with the CPUC, including the
diagnostic meetings, in support of the General
Order 88-B (GO 88-B) process for the modification
of an at-grade crossing.

3.4 Caltrans
The improvements within Caltrans right of way are
expected to be limited to traffic signal
modifications, striping modifications and traffic
control during construction. As such, it is expected
that the project will only require an encroachment
permit through the District 12 Local Assistance
unit. Efforts will include meetings and coordination
leading up to the permit application. Higher level
project documents such as a Design Engineering
Evaluation Report (DEER) or full project oversight
are excluded.

3.5 OCTA
As OCTA owns the railroad right of way,
coordination will be required throughout the project
design. Mark Thomas will respond to comments
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3192 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
4 and address concerns expressed by OCTA.

Coordination will also be provided with bus
operations for temporary and permanent locations
of bus stops and route impacts during construction.

3.6 Other Third Parties
Coordination with other third parties, including
Amtrak, BNSF, Greyhound Bus, and others, will be
provided as needed to convey the project design
and potential impacts.

3.7 Community Engagement
PLANNING, RESOURCES AND TOOLS:

Outreach Coordination Meetings: The team will
lead up to 24 outreach coordination meetings.

Agendas and meeting notes will be prepared for
each meeting, as appropriate.

Outreach Strategy & Planning: A Public
Involvement Plan (PIP) will be developed at the
start to serve as a blueprint for all community
engagement activities and will include a
demographic analysis to ensure outreach efforts
reflect the needs of the community, while aligning
Title VI, environmental justice, and accessibility
guidelines to ensure equitable participation. Up to
four (4x) strategic work plans will also be
developed for key milestone community meetings
to guide tactics and methods of engagement
toward desired outcomes.

Stakeholder Database, Comment Log &
Engagement Tracking: A project-specific
stakeholder database will be developed and
maintained with comment log, and engagement log
to support transparent documentation and
reporting throughout the Project. The stakeholder
database will include residents, businesses,
agencies, elected officials, community
organizations and more. The City will maintain the
Project email address and may establish a project
hotline, if needed, to receive public inquiries and
comments outside of planned engagement
activities. Public comments received through
meetings, events, email, and other engagement
channels will be documented and coordinated with
the City and Team for response and inclusion in
project records. Logs will be maintained with
support from the City and Team to ensure
accuracy.

Branding, Collateral & Presentation Materials:

Development of eye-catching Project branding
package consistent with City of Santa Ana
standards will support consistent and recognizable
project communications. Outreach materials may
include a project logo, visual identity elements,
presentation templates, display boards, and
miscellaneous meeting materials.

The team will also support the City in the
development of an Overview Fact Sheet and
Frequently Asked Questions or talking points, as
needed, to support public engagement activities
and stakeholder communications. Collateral will be
updated up two times to support refinements in
messaging from the start of the project. Visuals
and renderings developed by Mark Thomas will be
integrated into outreach materials and public
meeting materials to support effective
communication of project concepts.

Website & Notifications: Project-related content
will be drafted and coordinated with City staff to
support the establishment and ongoing
maintenance of a project webpage hosted on the
City’s website. Website content may include a
project overview, meeting announcements,
summaries of engagement activities, and posting
of meeting materials for public access.

Establishment of vanity URL link(s) is
recommended to develop Project recognition and
facilitate more effective print notifications.

Each meeting round will be supported by a
comprehensive, layered notification campaign,
which may include webpage updates and
announcements, direct mail, flyer distribution,
eblasts, social media outreach, and other digital
communications. Property owner and occupant
mailing lists will be acquired, as needed, prior to
each community meeting to support timely and
accurate direct mail notifications up to 500-feet of
the rail corridor.

ENGAGEMENTS & REPORTING:

Community Meetings & Summary Reporting (up to
4x) are included.

The Team anticipates holding four rounds of one,
in-person, open house format community meetings
over the course of environmental review and
design development. Meetings will be timed to
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3193 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
5 align with major Project milestones, including
Project introduction and environmental scoping,
environmental review and alternatives evaluation,
design development and refinement, and final
design and construction readiness.

All outreach materials and engagement activities
will be provided in English and Spanish, with
bilingual staff available to support meeting
participation. We will lead meeting logistics and
materials development, including venue
coordination, sign-in sheets, wayfinding, comment
cards, and related support. The Team will remain
flexible and may incorporate virtual meeting
formats if directed by the City to enhance
accessibility and participation.

Meetings will provide opportunities for community
members to review project information, ask
questions, and provide input at each stage of
project development. Public feedback will be
documented and summarized following each
meeting, with summaries coordinated with the City
and consultant team to inform environmental
documentation, design refinement, and project
decision-making.

This scope of work assumes that community
meetings will not require a formal scoping meeting
or Public Hearing process as part of NEPA,
including legal notice, court reporting, formal
comment collection, etc. However, we are
prepared to support the City if that need arises.

Up to 16 Stakeholder Briefings are provided,
including City Council and Planning Commission
briefings. These engagements will be tracked in a
log for public record.

Individual outreach summaries will be prepared for
each community meeting, event, and activity, as
needed. A comprehensive Final Outreach Report
will also be prepared at the conclusion of the
engagement program, documenting all outreach
activities, notifications, participation metrics, and
key themes for the project record.

3.8 Supporting Graphics
Mark Thomas shall develop coordinated threedimensional (3D) visualization materials to support design development, agency coordination, and
community engagement. The Graphics Team shall
prepare a detailed 3D model using Autodesk 3DS
Max and Unreal Engine that reflects existing and
proposed conditions, including roadway geometry,
bridge and structural elements, transit facilities,
pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, grading,
landscaping, lighting, and key streetscape
features. The model shall be developed to
accurately convey the scale, materials, spatial
relationships, and shall be developed to support
visualization of the overall character and user
experience of the proposed improvements.

From the developed 3D model, the Graphics Team
shall prepare high-quality still renderings and an
interactive 3D visualization model suitable for
public meetings, City presentations, and
stakeholder coordination. The interactive model
shall be deployed using Pixel Streaming to allow
web-based access through standard internet
browsers without the need for specialized
software. Select visualization content may also be
incorporated into an ArcGIS StoryMap to support
public-facing communication. Visualization updates
and revisions shall be coordinated with the design
team and incorporated at key project milestones.

Cloud-based hosting and access to the interactive
model shall be provided for approximately 24
months.

Task Deliverables:
Meeting Agendas, Minutes & Exhibits
Public Outreach Plan, Collateral Materials
Photosimulations, Renderings, interactive
3D visualization model
Task 4 Standards

4.1 Design Exceptions – City
A design memorandum will be prepared for the
City that documents the design guidance and
standards utilized for the project, including
Caltrans, AASHTO, PROWAG and NACTO.

4.2 Design Exceptions – SCRRA
Prepare design exceptions for elements not
meeting the Metrolink or AASHTO standards,
including calculations, exhibits, etc. as necessary
to support the exception and waiver requests.

It is assumed that up to three SCRRA Form DPM13: Request for Special Consideration for items EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3194 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
6 that deviate from SCRRA standards and manuals.

These are anticipated to include requests for
deviations from 1) minimum temporary horizontal
clearance requirements, 2) the requirement that a
minimum of two columns be provided per track,
and 3) bridge skew angle.

4.3 Design Exceptions – Caltrans
No design exceptions anticipated, an optional task
has been provided in case the need arises through
the project development.

Task Deliverables:
City Design Memorandum
SCRRA Design Exception Memorandum
Task 5 Site Survey

5.1 Project Control
Mark Thomas will establish horizontal control
based on CCS83, Zone VI, and vertical control will
be based on the City of Santa Ana Vertical Datum,
to be confirmed with the City prior to control
establishment. Mark Thomas to set temporary
control points for future design and construction
survey within the project limits. Mark Thomas to
obtain applicable encroachment permits prior to
beginning any field survey work. Mark Thomas to
also coordinate and verify datum(s) with SCRRA,
where appropriate.

5.2 Aerial Topography
Once the project control is established, Mark
Thomas will establish supplemental horizontal and
vertical control necessary for orienting the
photogrammetric survey. Mark Thomas will acquire
new color stereo image data covering the abovementioned project area that will be suitable in resolution, scale and image quality for developing
key topographic break lines and improvements.

Mark Thomas will collect data during the primary
data acquisition mission using conventional flight
methods. Aerial imagery will be obtained when the
ground is not obscured by smog, haze, fog or dust,
and when cloud or cloud shadow coverage will not
appear in any image. Refer to MAGENTA area in
Figure 1 below illustrating the general footprint of
the topographic data/aerial imagery to be captured
and processed.

Mark Thomas will map all planimetric feature data
in three dimensions to generate an Aerial
Topographic Survey Base Map with aerial imagery
background at 1” = 40’ scale. Mapped features will
generally include roof outlines of buildings and
other major structures, tops/toes of channels, edge
of pavement for all paved surfaces, manholes,
drop inlets, parking areas, curbs/gutters,
sidewalks, fences, walls, signs, utility poles, light
poles, above ground utility service facilities, storm
drain facilities, ditches, streams, trees/tree
outlines, dense brush, bulkheads, and other visible
improvements at the surface elevation. Mass
points and break lines will be collected along all
mapped improvements listed above to create
continuous contours with a 1.0’ interval and a
Digital Terrain Model (DTM).

Assumptions
Up to eight (8) aerial ground control targets
will be established
Aerial topographic mapping will not be
reviewed by Caltrans (no “ABC” submittal
for this project)
Field surveys to be conducted under traffic
control plan, if required.

Task Deliverables
Project Control in CSV and PDF formats
Basemap LandNet file in AutoCAD, PDF
formats
Aerial Topographic Survey Base Map in
AutoCAD, PDF and SHP formats
Color Digital Orthophotography (JPG or
TIFF format)
Digital Terrain Model (DTM) in CAD format
Site Photos, Videos and Field Notes

5.3 Field Survey
Once the geometrics are refined utilizing the aerial
mapping, Mark Thomas will perform supplemental
as-built design surveys within the Project Area,
approximate areas as shown below in Figure 1,
per direction of the resident engineer. Topographic
survey data to be collected using a conventional
Total Station, static/mobile LiDAR and/or GPS and
will include, but is not limited to, improvements
such hardscape, drainage features, utility facilities,
break lines, driveways, and other pertinent
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3195 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
7 features to produce accurate elevations and
horizontal locations.

Other mapped features will generally include, but
are not limited to: edge of pavement, curb and
gutter, curb ramps, sidewalks, driveways, parking
features, roadway crown, critical flow areas,
landscape features such as trees greater than 6”
trunk diameter and significant vegetation,
manholes, drop inlets, walls, signs,
utility/light/signal poles, above ground utility service facilities and underground utility paint mark
locations, storm drain facilities, and other visible
improvements at the ground surface elevations.

Cross-sections will be performed at maximum of
50’ intervals where requested and will generally
extend approximately 10’ back of walk or to rightof-way lines, where accessible. Break lines will be collected along all mapped improvements listed
above to create continuous contours with a 1.0’
interval and a Digital Terrain Model (DTM).

Mark Thomas has will invert/dip and detail up to
twenty (20) storm drain manholes, sewer
manholes and catch basin features within the
project area.

If working within railroad right of way, Mark
Thomas survey crew(s) to have appropriate BNSF
Roadway Worker Protection (RWP) training and
Figure 1. Aerial Mapping Limits
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3196 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
8 will have completed BNSF Contractor Safety
Orientation (obtain safety badges). Railroad
Worker in Charge (RWIC) flagging services, if
required, are not included in this proposal.

Assumptions
Maximum of twenty (20) field mobilizations
for as-built topographic surveys
Maximum of twenty (20) sewer, storm drain
and catch basin features will be located,
inverted (dipped) and detailed
Task Deliverables
Topographic Survey Base Map in
AutoCAD, PDF
Digital Terrain Model (DTM) in CAD format
Detailed field notes of drain features such
as sewer/stormdrain manhole dips and
catchbasins
Site Photos, Videos
Survey Field Notes
Task 6 Environmental Revalidation
The CEQA SE will be updated to reflect the current
project configuration. NEPA Revalidation will be
prepared with supporting technical study updates,
as per Caltrans (FHWA delegation) and FRA
requirements.

6.1 CEQA Statutory Exemption (SE)
Once the project team has agreed upon the project
design that will move forward, the design
information will be used to update the Project
description that was included in the previously
adopted CEQA statutory exemption (SE). An
updated CEQA will be filed for the project.

6.2 NEPA Revalidation
ICF will prepare a single NEPA/CEQA
Environmental Re-Validation (ER) form (NEPA
portion only) based on the ER form that is
available on the Caltrans Standard Environmental
Reference (SER) at the time of this submission.

Using existing available information studies listed
herein, the ER will document the following items
and identify whether there are:
Changes in project design (e.g., substantial
scope change; a new alternative; change in
project alignment)
Changes in environmental setting (e.g.,
new development affecting traffic or air
quality)
Changes in environmental circumstances
(e.g., a new law or regulation; change in
the status of a listed species)
Changes to environmental impacts of the
project (e.g., a new type of impact, or a
change in the magnitude of an existing
impact)
Changes to avoidance, minimization,
and/or mitigation measures since the
environmental document was approved.

A brief discussion related to the validity of the
information provided in the adopted NEPA
documentation related to potentially impacted
resources will be included. Since the project was
addressed with a CEQA Statutory Exemption (SE)
it is assumed that no CEQA related discussion will
be required. It is also assumed that the purpose
and need from the adopted NEPA documentation
will not be revisited or revised and that all areas
will be addressed qualitatively and no quantitative
analyses will be required, unless otherwise
specifically noted in this scope of work.

Furthermore, it is assumed that no separate
technical studies, beyond the those studies
identified in herein.

Areas where a separate technical study will not be
prepared but are assumed to require more than a
cursory discussion are presented below.

Biological Resources - there are some species
that have had changes to their listing status since
the NEPA CE was adopted. This includes Monarch
butterfly, burrowing owl, and Crotch’s bumblebee.

Based on the conditions at the project site, it is not
expected that suitable habitat is present and it is
therefore expected that there would be no potential
for impacts to any listed species. The biological
resources effort will consist of obtaining an
updated Unites States Fish and Wildlife Service
species list and conducting a review the California
Natural Diversity Database to identify any species
with the potential to be present/occur. Following
the review of this information, a field visit will be
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3197 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
9 conducted to confirm that no suitable habitat is
present and that these species do not have the
potential to be present. It is assumed that no
species will have the potential to be present and
that no additional biological evaluation or studies
will be required. It is assumed that the biological
resources information will be directly incorporated
into the ER.

Cultural Resources – The cultural resources
effort will consist of conducting a record search to
confirm that no resources have been identified that
are eligible for listing on the National Register of
Historic Places (NRHP) or California Register of
Historical Resources (CRHR). In addition, a review
will be conducted to confirm that no resources that
were not previously of age would now require
evaluation. It is expected that no resources will be
present that are eligible for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places or California Register of
Historical Resources, that no resources will require
evaluation, and that the cultural discussion will be
directly incorporated into the ER.

Water Quality – The water quality effort will
consist of reviewing the list of impaired water
bodies to confirm no changes have occurred and
no new water bodies are listed as impacted, and
updating any information, regulations, and regional
permits information that is now outdated. This
discussion will be directly incorporated into the ER.

It is assumed that no new mitigation, or elimination
or reduction of mitigation commitments, will be
identified or required, that no revisions to the
CEQA/NEPA documentation itself (or new,
supplemental, or subsequent environmental
documentation) will be required, that no
meaningful modifications to any measures will be
required, and that no recirculation or public
availability of the CEQA/NEPA documentation will
be required. It is assumed that no new laws or
regulations will be identified since adoption of the
NEPA documentation that require analysis,
evaluation, or documentation beyond that identified
in this scope of work.

Based on the results of the above analyses a
determination will be provided on the NEPA/CEQA
Re-Validation Form regarding the validity of the
existing NEPA determination and findings. It is
assumed that the finding will be that the NEPA
documentation is still valid in conjunction with the
above listed analyses and that no further action is
required related to environmental documentation.

As part of the ER effort, the Environmental
Commitment Record (ECR) will be updated to
reflect any changes, additions, or deletions to the
measures included in the previously adopted
NEPA documentation. The ECR will be an
attachment to the ER. Finally, the Transportation
Air Quality Conformity Findings Checklist will be
prepared as an attachment to the ER.

6.3 Technical Study Updates
Preparation of all technical analyses and reports
will follow local, state, and federal environmental
guidelines, primarily consisting of the Caltrans
SER website, Caltrans Project Development
Procedures Manual, local and state CEQA
Guidelines, and FHWA Technical Advisory
6640.81 Guidance on Preparing and Processing
Environmental and Section 4(f) Documents. The
formats to be used for the technical studies will
follow the guidance available on the Caltrans SER
website as of the date that those studies are
initiated.

Only those technical studies identified in this scope
of work are assumed or included. Any other
technical studies or efforts are assumed to be not
required, or will be addressed/prepared by others
and provided to ICF. For this scope of work, the
technical studies for which a specific scope of work
has been included have been assumed based on a
review of existing project information and a
preliminary review of the project site. If additional
studies are identified during the environmental
phase of the project a scope of work and cost will
be submitted for approval by the City prior to their
initiation.

For each technical study the following submittals
are assumed (additional submittals would be
considered out of scope):
Draft Technical Study (electronically to the
City and then to Caltrans)
Revised Draft Technical Study
(electronically to the City and Caltrans for
concurrent review)
Final Technical Study for approval
(electronically to the City and Caltrans for
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3198 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
10 concurrent review and concurrence;
assumes no further comments)

6.3.1 Traffic Analysis
While the reduction in lanes is supported by
preliminary review of average daily traffic, a
focused review of peak hour travel is needed to
confirm commute congestion is within City and
OCTA standards. The study will evaluate the
Santa Ana Boulevard corridor intersections using
microsimulation software, SimTraffic, which is
appropriate for closely spaced intersections in
congested corridors. Microsimulation is required to
evaluate how queues between intersections build
up over space and time and potentially create
gridlock between the closely spaced intersections.

The following five intersections will be evaluated:

1. Santiago Street/Santa Ana Boulevard

2. Fuller Street/Santa Ana Boulevard

3. I-5 SB Off-Ramp/Santa Ana Boulevard

4. Santa Ana Boulevard from Santiago Street
to Fuller Street

5. Santa Ana Boulevard from Fuller Street to
I-5 SB Off-Ramp
Fehr & Peers will collect new peak period turning
movement traffic counts (7-9 AM & 4-6 PM) to
prepare the existing conditions baseline condition.

Traffic counts will include pedestrian and bicycle
counts to reflect the active uses in the corridor. A
24-hour vehicle classification count will also be
conducted on Santa Ana Boulevard to understand
heavy vehicle percentages. Fehr & Peers will
collect traffic signal timing from the City of Santa
Ana and Caltrans at the study locations.

Fehr & Peers will conduct an existing conditions
assessment that will evaluate the existing roadway
system, transit network, and pedestrian/bicycle
facilities within the study area, along with existing
traffic volumes, and intersection and roadway
levels of service.

Fehr & Peers will prepare future traffic forecasts for
the below scenarios utilizing OCTA’s latest travel
demand model, Orange County Transportation
Analysis Model (OCTAM), which is consistent with
Connect SoCal 2024 (Southern California
Association of Governments 2024 Regional
Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities
Strategy with base year 2019 and future year
2050). A review of OCTAM land use will be
conducted to confirm that land use growth
assumptions are consistent with City expectations
(Please note that Fehr & Peers recently conducted
this model land use review as part of the City’s
Climate Action Plan and found consistency with
City growth expectations). Two future model runs
(with and without project) will be performed to
understand potential redistribution with the project.

1. Opening Year Conditions: project opening
year conditions assuming no project. An
ambient growth rate will be developed by
referencing OCTAM and the inclusion of
relevant pending and approved
development projects anticipated to be in
operation by opening year.

2. Future Year Conditions: Future year
conditions to be based on OCTAM
forecasts with no project.

3. Existing plus Construction Conditions: An
analysis of potential impacts during
construction of the proposed project
assuming that one lane in each direction
will be provided throughout construction.

4. Opening plus Project Conditions: Opening
year traffic volumes with project roadway
configuration.

5. Future plus Project Conditions: Future year
traffic volumes with project roadway
configuration.

Traffic analysis will be prepared to confirm
intersection lane configurations and turn pockets
are adequately sized to support future traffic with
the project. Off-ramp queues will also be
evaluated to confirm I-5 mainline traffic would not
be affected by potential spillback.

It is assumed that no more than two rounds of
comments will be received on the draft study from
the City and Caltrans.

6.3.2 Phase I ESA
A Project-wide Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment (ESA) will be prepared for the project
area. Additionally, we will review the Phase II work
prepared by others in the prior phase and provide
input on what applies to the Project. Note that this
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3199 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
11 scope does not include parcel-specific ESAs for
parcels to be acquired for the Project.

The ESA will check for historical evidence of
potential site contamination for the Project study
area and will be performed in general accordance
with ASTM E1527-21 and Caltrans Standards, and
will consist of the following:
Conducting a review of available existing
local, state, and federally maintained
databases of hazardous materials sites and
underground storage tank records
generated by EDR, Inc.
Reviewing available historic aerial
photographs and topographic maps to help
identify prior land uses.
Performing a brief visual of the Project from
the public right-of-way to document existing
conditions.
Identifying sites of recognized
environmental conditions (REC) that may
have significant potential impact on the
Project construction and/or environment.
Preparing a draft Phase I ESA report.
Responding to one set of review comments
from the agency and providing a final
report.

The scope of services specifically excludes a
Phase II investigation for hazardous materials, an
evaluation for aerially deposited lead or other
chemicals of concern, and asbestos or lead-based
paint surveys. These services, if needed, can be
provided at an additional cost.

6.3.3 Air Quality
The Project is located within Orange County region
of the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). The SCAB
region where the project is located is within a
nonattainment area for the federal 8-hour ozone
(O3), lead, and particulate matter less than 2.5
micrometers in diameter (PM2.5) standards and
within an attainment/maintenance area for the
federal carbon monoxide (CO) and particulate
matter less than 10 micrometers in diameter
(PM10) standards. Therefore, the Project is subject
to Transportation Conformity. A Supplemental Air
Quality Report will be prepared to address the
change in the Project design (reduction in number
of lanes, etc.), the updated traffic study that will be prepare, and the changes in air quality related
requirements. The Air Quality report will consist of
the following.

Regulatory Setting and Existing Conditions.

Summarize the existing federal, state, and local air
quality regulatory environment as it affects the
proposed project, and describe the location of
sensitive receptors in the project vicinity. Using
data provided by the California Air Resources
Board (ARB) and the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD), the report will
characterize existing air quality conditions in the
project area and explain how those conditions are
affected by local climate and topography.

Regional Conformity. Evaluate whether the project
meets regional transportation conformity
requirements by determining whether it is included,
as currently defined, in the most recent Regional
Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities
Strategy (RTP/SCS) and Federal Transportation
Improvement Program (FTIP) prepared by the
Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG).

Project-Level Conformity. Evaluate whether the
project meets project-level transportation
conformity requirements, which will also be used to
support the CEQA/NEPA analysis.
Localized Carbon Monoxide Hot Spot
Analysis. Analyze the degree to which
project-related traffic volumes have a
potential to affect local carbon monoxide
(CO) concentrations using the California
Department of Transportation CO Hotspot
Protocol. It is anticipated that the CO
screening procedure will be appropriate,
and that CALINE-4 dispersion modeling will
not be required.
Localized PM2.5/PM10 Hot Spot Analysis.

The PM Hot Spot Analysis will assess the
degree to which project-related traffic
volumes have a potential to affect local
PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations. ICF will
prepare the required PM Conformity
documentation and submit to Caltrans for
review and approval. Caltrans will then
forward the documentation to the SCAG
Transportation Conformity Working Group
(TCWG). ICF will lead the TCWG
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3200 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
12 interagency consultation on behalf of the
Project Sponsor. Based on our review of
the proposed Project Description, it is
assumed that the project will not be
considered a Project of Air Quality Concern
(POAQC), and that a screening-level PM
conformity analysis will be sufficient.

Evaluation of Construction-Period Emissions. A
quantitative construction analysis will be performed
to evaluate regional and localized mass
emissions. Based on preliminary construction
scheduling and phasing information, construction
emissions will be quantified using the Road
Construction Emissions Model integrated into the
CalEEMod model.

Evaluation of Operations-Period Mass Emissions.

Regional criteria pollutant emissions will be
quantified using project-level vehicle miles traveled
(VMT) and current EMFAC emissions factors. In
order to accomplish this scope item, ICF must
receive project-level VMT for existing condition,
no-build condition for the opening year and horizon
year, and build alternative conditions for the
opening year and horizon year for each build
alternative.

Mobile Source Air Toxics. Evaluate proposed
project-related mobile source air toxics (MSATs)
emissions in accordance with FHWA updated
interim guidance on how MSATs should be
addressed in NEPA documents. It is assumed that
a quantitative analysis can be prepared.

Climate Change/Greenhouse Gas Emissions. A
quantification of operational-period greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions associated with
implementation of the proposed project will be
conducted. Operations-period GHG emissions will
be quantified using regional daily VMT; and current
EMFAC emissions factors. ICF will present a
comparison of GHG emissions under the Build
Alternatives and the No-build Alternative to
characterize effects of the proposed project on
GHG emissions. The analysis of climate change
will also incorporate the most recent guidance
found on the Caltrans Standard Environmental
Reference (SER) and Caltrans annotated outline.

Construction GHG emissions will be quantified
using the Road Construction Emissions Model
integrated into the CalEEMod model.

Mitigation Measures. ICF will develop mitigation
measures, where applicable, to address significant
air quality impacts, if present.

6.3.4 Supplemental Noise Study Report
Due to the change in the Project design (reduction
in number of lanes, etc.), the updated traffic study
that will be prepared, and the presence of new
developments with noise sensitive receptors that
have been constructed since the previous NSR
was approved, a Supplemental Noise Study
Report (SNSR) will be prepared. It is assumed the
previously prepared NSR will be redone in its
entirety since it was prepared using an outdated
version of TNM, was based on the old Caltrans
Noise Protocol, and does not meet current
requirements. The SNSR will be prepared
consistent with the guidance included in Caltrans’
Protocol and Caltrans’ Technical Noise
Supplement.

ICF noise staff will identify noise sensitive land
uses and other features using platforms such as
Google Earth prior to the field survey. ICF will
consult with the Caltrans District 12 noise
specialist (if necessary) assigned to this project to
ensure that all requirements are addressed. ICF
will also prepare a Noise Work Plan for Caltrans
review and approval prior to initiating the noise
work.

Existing noise conditions will be quantified based
on noise measurements conducted at locations
along the project alignment. Short-term monitoring
(10 to 15 minutes) will be conducted during
daylight hours at selected locations in the project
area at up to eight (8) locations. Long-term
monitoring (24 hours or more) will be conducted
provided a safe and secure location can be
identified to leave a long-term sound level meter in
the project area at up to two locations.

ICF will prepare a traffic noise model that
addresses the updated Project design, using the
FHWA Traffic Noise Model (TNM) Version 2.5.

This scope assumes that MT will provide 3-D
Computer Aided Design (CAD) topographical
maps, with elevation contours at no greater than
two-foot resolution, that extend at least 500 feet
outside of the right of way in all directions. TNM
will be used to model worst hour traffic noise
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3201 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
13 conditions at representative modeled receiver
locations under existing conditions and designyear build and no build conditions with the proposed Project. This scope also assumes that
the project engineer will provide as-built plans as
well as typical cross sections, alignment files, and
design files for all project improvements.

Traffic noise impacts for the Project will be
assessed under 23CFR772 by determining if
implementation of the Project is projected to result
in traffic noise levels under design-year conditions
that approach or exceed the FHWA noise
abatement criteria or if implementation of the
project is predicted to result in a substantial traffic noise increase (12 dB increase relative to the
existing) at noise-sensitive uses. If traffic noise
impacts are projected to occur, information on the
preliminary feasibility and reasonableness of noise
abatement, as defined in the Protocol, will be
evaluated and presented for use by decision
makers in considering noise abatement. ICF will
also evaluate potential construction noise impacts
using methods recommended by the U.S.

Department of Transportation and/or direction
included in Caltrans Standard Specifications (SS).

ICF will prepare a Supplemental (SNSR)
addressing the requirements of 23CFR772 in
accordance with guidance in the Protocol and
following the NSR format indicated in the Caltrans
Annotated Noise Study Report Outline. Should
impacts be identified, the SNSR will include a
preliminary noise abatement design to
schematically identify the location, height, and
extent of noise barriers needed to abate noise
impacts (if applicable). In accordance with Protocol
guidance, the description of noise walls will be
sufficient for environmental review of the Project,
but not for final design of the walls. It is assumed
that up to three (3) noise barriers will need to be
evaluated.

6.3.5 Noise Abatement Decision Report
ICF will prepare a Noise Abatement Decision
Report (NADR) analyzing the reasonable
allowance for any barriers and respective barrier
heights that meet the feasibility requirement and
design goal discussed in the SNSR.

The NADR will summarize reasonableness cost
allowances for barriers determined to be feasible in
the SNSR and compare these allowances to the
construction cost estimates for each barrier height
to identify any reasonable barrier and the barrier
heights to be included as abatement as part of the
project. This scope assumes that all cost estimates
for feasible walls will be provided by MT.

Comparisons between the reasonable cost
allowances and construction cost estimates will be
used to identify the preliminary cost
reasonableness of barriers. Any barrier found to be
reasonable will be identified and recommended as
abatement as part of the project.

It is assumed that up to three (3) noise barriers will
be evaluated in the NADR and that no noise
barriers will be determined to be reasonable.

Therefore, noise surveys are assumed to be not
required. If any noise barriers are determined to be
reasonable then noise barrier surveys would be
required and a scope and cost for this work will be
provided to MT and the City for approval prior to
conducting this effort.

6.3.6 Updated Caltrans Data Sheets
Provide an updated Caltrans Right of Way Data
Sheet (RWDS) for the project reflecting the change
in right of way impacts with the project design.

Monument will coordinate with the design team to
identify right-of-way acquisitions resulting from the
proposed improvements. Additionally, Monument
will provide information about existing conditions
within the project limits, including land use, and
any existing rights or encumbrances known to exist
on the affected properties. The specific steps
Monument will take to determine impacts and
estimate costs are as follows:
Perform a GIS analysis to identify property
and rights potentially affected by the
proposed design
Use publicly available data and other real
estate resources to confirm the ownership,
land use, zoning, lot size, and
improvements for each affected property.
Perform a desktop inspection of properties
to confirm the probable acquisition type
(fee, easement, temporary construction
easement, etc.), including identifying
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3202 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
14 existing uses or personal property to be
relocated (if any).
Calculate the fee and/or easement area
(including temporary construction
easements) that will need to be acquired
for each impacted property using design
data and assessor boundary information.
Estimate the total capital cost of acquisition
for all parcels, including real estate costs,
relocation assistance, severance damages,
loss of goodwill, fixtures and equipment,
demolition, and clearance.
Estimate permit costs.
Estimate the total support cost for all
parcels, including appraisal fees,
condemnation costs, title and escrow fees,
environmental fees, and consultant fees as
necessary.
Escalate costs to anticipated right-of-way
acquisition date.
Prepare a draft Caltrans Right of Way Data
Sheet using Caltrans Exhibit 17-EX-21
(Right of Way Data Sheet for Local Public
Agencies) for the Build Alternatives.
Update the RWDS based on comments
from the design team and the City, and
submit a final Draft RWDS.
Respond to comments from Caltrans R/W
as necessary and make required updates
to the Data Sheets.

Based on the properties identified by the design,
environmental, and real estate teams as impacted
by the Project, Monument will determine the
number and types of potentially displaced uses.

This research will be based on data sources,
including but not limited to County Assessor
Records, CRMLS, DataTree, LandVision, Costar,
and Google Maps. Monument will prepare a
discussion of displacements that would result from
each acquisition. The discussion will identify the
number and type of residences or businesses
affected, as well as the estimated number of
affected occupants or employees, as appropriate.

Monument will also perform a search to verify that
a sufficient number of comparable replacement
sites would be available to support relocation of
the displaced users.

Assumptions:
RWDS will be prepared for a maximum of 1
Build Alternative.
Maximum of 2 updates based on
comments from the City and Caltrans.

6.3.7 Relocation Impact Memorandum
A Relocation Impact Memorandum will be provided
for the NEPA revalidation. The document will be
updated based on City and/or Caltrans
comments as appropriate and submit a Final for
the revalidation.

Task 6 Deliverables:
Updated CEQA SE
Updated Project Description, Project
Vicinity Map, Project Location Map and
Project Layout Map
Draft Environmental Re-Validation for City
and then Caltrans review
Revised Draft Environmental Re-Validation
for City and Caltrans review
Final Environmental Re-Validation for City
review and Caltrans review and approval
(assumes no additional comments)
Draft & Final Technical Study Updates
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3203 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
15 Task 7 Roadway/Civil Improvements
The full suite of roadway, traffic, lighting, utility,
drainage and landscape plans will be produced,
adhering to the City and SCRRA submittal
requirements.

7.1 Concept Development
Mark Thomas will provide preliminary geometric
drawings for the Metrolink “A” submittal (5%) level.

The geometric drawings will include the following:
Plans, typical sections, profiles (Santa Ana
Boulevard, Fuller Street, Logan Street,
entrance to SARTIC).
Plans will generally include geometric
conditions, striping configuration, drainage
considerations, right of way impacts, and
approximate limits of grading.
Any nonstandard design elements will be
documented (City, SCRRA) and will be
included in a memorandum as part of Task

4.1 and 4.2.
Preliminary Bridge Improvement Layout for
up to two (2) bridge alternatives.
Preliminary Stage Construction Concept.

7.2 Roadway Improvements
Mark Thomas will develop the following
improvement plans for the standard sequence of
35%, 65%, 95%, 100%, and Final.

7.2.1 Roadway Plans
The following sheets (and number of sheets) are
anticipated for the Santa Ana Boulevard
Underpass:
Title / Index / Key Map / General Notes (5)
Typical Sections (4)
Disposition and Demolition Plans (5, 20
Scale)
Roadway Design plans Santa Ana
Boulevard (4, 20 Scale)
Profiles Santa Ana Boulevard (4, 20 Scale)
Roadway Plan and Profiles Other Streets
(9, 20 Scale)
Intersection Grid Details (2, 10 Scale)
Curb Ramp / Driveway Details (5, 10 Scale)
Offsite Grading (6, 20 Scale)
Miscellaneous Details (2)
Grading Sheets (5, 20 Scale)
Total Sheets: 51

7.2.2 Survey Control Plans
Mark Thomas will prepare the Survey Control
plans sheets for the 65%, 95%, 100%, and Final
submittal phases of the Engineering Design. It is
assumed that the following is required:
Survey Control Plan (2)

7.2.3 Signing & Striping
Mark Thomas will develop signing and striping
plans for Santa Ana Boulevard, covering the
segment from Santiago Street to Grand Avenue, to
support the integration of the grade separation
between Santa Ana Boulevard and railroad.
Signing & Striping Plan (1, 40 scale)

7.2.4 Staging, Traffic Handling, Detours, Site
Control and Fencing Plan
Mark Thomas will develop staging and traffic
handling plans following the latest CAMUTCD
edition. At each stage, at least one travel lane in
both directions and pedestrian access along Santa
Ana Boulevard will remain open. The detour plans
will be based on the latest CAMUTCD edition. The
Site Control and Fencing Plan includes identifying
right-of-way and easement limits, and applicable
railroad agency and city standards, and
coordination with the railroad agency and city to
confirm site control and fencing requirements. The
plan shall identify permanent and temporary site
control areas and define required fencing along the
rail corridor and construction limits to protect
railroad operations, the public, and construction
activities. Fencing limits, types, heights, and gate
locations shall conform to City standards, railroad
standards, and agency’s safety requirements.
Stage Construction / Traffic Handling Plans
(12, 40 scale)
Detour Plans (2, 200 scale)
Site Control and Fencing Plans (3, 40
scale)
Total Sheets: 17
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3204 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
16 7.2.5 Traffic Signal & Interconnect
It is assumed that the following is required:
One traffic signal modification at Santa Ana
Boulevard/Santiago Street (City)
One new traffic signal at Santa Ana
Boulevard/Fuller Street (City)
For traffic signal modifications the City will request
new service cabinets, controller cabinets, controller
hardware, and poles, as well as traffic signal
interconnect and fiber.

Record drawings will be collected for electrical
systems from Caltrans and City of Santa Ana,
including Traffic Signals, Street Lighting,
Interconnect, and Caltrans Fiber Optic
Communications. A field visit will be performed to
confirm (where possible) the data described in the
record drawings and collect information that will be
needed to perform the design.

It is assumed there are no traffic monitoring (TMS)
features and that updates to the ramp meters will
not be required. This scope does not assume
temporary traffic signals will be required.

Our sheet assumptions associated with the above
design requirements are as follows:
City Traffic Signal Plans (2)

Traffic Signal Interconnect (1)
Total sheets: 4

7.2.6 Street and Pedestrian Lighting
Street lighting will be provided along Santa Ana
Boulevard and Fuller Street. Pedestrian level
lighting along the pedestrian path from Santiago
Street to the pedestrian bridge, the stairs, the
pedestrian bridge, and the pedestrian promenade.

It is assumed that no Caltrans lighting is required.

Fehr & Peers will prepare photometric calculations
in support of the street lighting and pedestrian
scale lighting plans.

The following sheets are anticipated:
Street Lighting Plans (2)

7.2.7 Utility Plans
Utility plans will be provided within the project
limits. Existing utilities (type, owner, disposition)
will be shown. Proposed utilities will be added to
the plans as the utility coordination advances and
utility relocation plans are being developed. A
Utility Pothole table will be included when
available. The following sheets are anticipated:
Utility Plans (6)

7.2.8 Water Main Relocations
Tetratech will prepare construction drawings for
the Water Main relocations for the 35%, 65%,
95%, 100%, and Final submittals. It is assumed
that the following is required:
General notes / abbreviations / construction
notes (1)
Horizontal control plan (1)
Key map for pipeline alignments (1)
Plan and Profile sheets (5, 20 scale)
Detail sheets with existing pipeline
connection details, service line/meter detail,
valve detail, hydrant detail, casing detail
and miscellaneous details (2)
Total Sheets: 10

7.2.9 Sewer Main Relocations
Mark Thomas will prepare construction drawings
for the Sewer Main relocations for the 35%, 65%,
95%, 100%, and Final submittals. It is assumed
that the following is required:
Plan and Profile sheets (3, 20 scale)
Detail sheets (2)
Total Sheets: 4

7.3 Drainage Improvements

7.3.1 Hydrology & Hydraulics Report
Tetra Tech will prepare hydrologic and hydraulic
analyses, calculations, and reports to support
required storm drain relocation and realignment.

Our analysis will begin with reviewing existing
documents as well as Orange County Flood
Control drainage systems and as-built documents
including review of topographic data and street
improvement plans in the vicinity of the project
area that will be provided by the City to understand
the flow patterns of the existing drainage area and
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3205 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
17 future proposed conditions. There will need to be
confirmation if the Interstate 5 sump to the north
outputs it’s pumped flow to a pipe that leads to the
south to the project site to join the main drainage
pipe. This includes a site visit to the project site to review the watershed and the Caltrans pump
station.

Based on topographic data, the improvement
plans, and confirmation of the drainage patterns to
the site through coordination with Orange County
Flood Control District and Caltrans, Tetra Tech
WTR will conduct a series of analyses based on
the OCPW Hydrology Manual (OCHM)
methodology generating high confidence flows
(per the OCHM Addendum) for flood control
design purposes that will include the following:
A Hydrology Study. This will include an
existing condition baseline study of the
watershed, flow paths, concentration
points, and routing delineations based on
topography and pipe
dimensions/elevations. It also includes land
use, and land cover per the Orange County
hydrology manual and available Orange
County geomatics data.
Rational Method Analysis. Using the
hydrology input, the rational method will be
implemented in AES to determine time of
concentration and designed discharges for
the 10, 25, and 100 year events which
aligns with both the City of Santa Ana and
Orange County Public Works (OCPW)
requirements.
Unit Hydrograph Analysis. Using the
hydrology input, a unit hydrograph method
will be implemented also to determine
volumes discharged to the proposed pump
station.
WSPG Analysis. Pipe hydraulics will be
conducted using the Los Angeles County
2018 WSGP software for all the proposed
pipe systems that lead to the proposed
pump station and pump station outlet pipe
to the existing storm drain system. If the
Caltrans pump on Interstate 5 to the north
discharges into the project area, an
evaluation of that pump system and
resulting outflows will be included based on
provided data.
Street Flow/Catch Basin analysis. Street
flow hydraulics of the existing roadway and
catch basins will be analyzed for the
roadway hazard during design storm
events.
Proposed Condition Alternative Measures.

Conceptual designs will be developed to
minimize storm flows to the proposed
project grade crossing and associated
pump station location. This will evaluate
measures that may include diverting flows
around the project site, detaining water in
basins or offline catchments, and
stormwater infiltration.
A technical memorandum will be prepared,
summarizing the baseline existing condition
of the project drainage area and include
study assumptions, results, and findings for
each task previously listed to inform the
pump station proposed design and
potential alternative measures that could be
incorporated to limit the pump station
sizing.

After review and incorporation of the results of the
baseline study by the project design team and
pump station design team, a proposed condition
analysis will be performed incorporating new
grading, drainage patterns, and pump station and
pipe locations, etc. This will include:
Proposed condition Hydrology Study
Proposed condition Rational Method
Analysis
Proposed condition Unit Hydrograph
Analysis
Proposed condition WSPG analysis to
include HEC-HMS for modeling the pump
station functionality
Proposed condition Street Flow/Catch
Basis analysis, and
Proposed condition Technical
Memorandum
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3206 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
18 7.3.2 Pump Station (inclusive of structure,
electrical, mechanical, SCADA) and
Retention Basin
The design of the pump station and retention
design includes the following:
Storm Water Pump Station including civil,
mechanical, electrical, control and
instrumentation and
structural
Separate electrical building
Below grade storage
Flow Control Discharge Valve Vault
Connection to existing City storm drain
facility
At time or proposal we envision the following
process:
Mark Thomas Company will provide a
single point of connection for the storm
water conveyance within Santa Ana
Boulevard to a location near the storm
water pump station. The pump station will
include integral trash screens, a sediment
pit, weir wall and adjacent wet well for
submersible pumps. The storm water
pumps are assumed to be driven by
variable frequency drives.
The storm water pump station will convey
storm water to an underground retention
structure
The underground retention structure is
assumed to be either a cast-in-place
concrete underground storage tank or
multiple HDPE cylindrical storage tanks
A flow control vault with a motor operated
modulating plug valve to control the
downstream water elevation into the City’s
existing system.

Our scope of work includes preparing civil,
mechanical, structural, and electrical and controls
and process and instrumentation construction
drawings for a stormwater pump station and
retention design.

Design Plans for the pump station and retention
design are expected to include the following
sheets:
General Notes, Abbrev and Const Notes
(1)
Horizontal Control Plan (2)
Overall Site Plan (1)
Storm Water Pump Station Site Plan (1)
Storm Water Pump Station Grading Plan
(1)
Storm Water Tank Site Plan (1)
Storm Water Tank Grading Plan (1)
Yard Piping Stormwater Pump Station Plan
(1)
Yard Piping Stormwater Storage Tank Plan
(1)
Plan and Profile (4)
Civil Details (3)
Mechanical Pump Station Plan (1)
Mechanical Pump Station Sections (1)
Mechanical Stormwater Discharge Control
Vault Plan (1)
Mechanical Stormwater Discharge Control
Vault Sections (1)
Mechanical Details (3)
Structural General Notes (1)
Structural Design Criteria (1)
Structural Special Inspections and
Observations (1)
Structural Pump Station Foundation Plan
(1)
Structural Pump Station Intermediate Floor
Plan (1)
Structural Pump Station Roof Plan (1)
Structural Pump Station Sections (3)
Structural Valve Vault Foundation Plan (1)
Structural Valve Vault Roof Plan (1)
Structural Valve Vault Section (1)
Structural Pump Station and Valve Vault
Details (6)
Structural Electrical/Control Building
Foundation Plan (1)
Structural Electrical/Control Building Roof
Plan (1)
Structural Electrical/Control Building
Sections (1)
Structural Electrical/Control Building
Elevations (2)
Structural Electrical/Control Building Details
(3)
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3207 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
19 Structural Stormwater Water Tank
Foundation Plan (1)
Structural Stormwater Water Tank Roof
Plan (1)
Structural Stormwater Water Tank
Elevations (2)
Structural Stormwater Water Tank Details
(4)
Electrical General Sheet (1)
Electrical Stormwater Pump Station Site
Plan (1)
Electrical Stormwater Pump Station Power
Plan (1)
Electrical Stormwater Pump Station Control
Plan (1)
Electrical Stormwater Pump Station
Lighting Plan (1)
Electrical Stormwater Pump Station
Grounding Plan (1)
Electrical Stormwater Tank Power and
Control Plan (1)
Electrical Stormwater Control Building
Power Plan (1)
Electrical Stormwater Control Building
Control Plan (1)
Electrical Stormwater Control Building
Lighting Plan (1)
Electrical Stormwater Control Vault Power
and Control Plan (1)
Electrical Stormwater Control Vault Lighting
Plan (1)
Electrical Single Line Diagram (1)
Electrical Conduit Schedules (2)
Electrical Pump Control Schematic (1)
Electrical Details (3)
P&IDs (3)
Total sheets: 80
Tetra Tech will rely on geotechnical design
parameters provided by Mark Thomas.

It is assumed the Pump Station and retention
improvements are within properties that will be
affected with the Project. Therefore, Tetra Tech will
prepare the needed plans for relocation or
demolitions and re-establishment (such as
irrigation, landscape, electrical services, lighting,
gas services, communication, etc.).

7.3.3 Storm Drain Plans
Mark Thomas will prepare construction drawings
for the Storm Drain Plan relocations for the 35%,
65%, 95%, 100%, and Final submittals. It is
assumed that the following is required:
Plan and Profile sheets (5, 20 scale)
Detail sheets (2)
Total Sheets: 7

7.4 Water Quality

7.4.1 WQMP
Tetra Tech will prepare a WQMP for the project as
required for urban runoff from municipal separate
storm systems (MS4 Permit). The scope of the
WQMP shall include recommendation for post
construction permanent best management
practices (BMP’s), including source control
(structural and non-structural) and treatment
BMPs.

Scope assumes recommendations for BMPs shall
be incorporated into the projects PS&E for the
design tasks by Mark Thomas. Base project data
for SWPPP preparation (areas, slopes, etc.) will be
provided.

Scope assumes SWPPP will be provided by the
construction contractor per the RFP.

7.4.2 Water Quality/BMP Plans
Mark Thomas will prepare construction drawings
for the Water Quality/BMP Plans for the 35%,
65%, 95%, 100%, and Final submittals. The
Layout and details will be included in the Storm
Drain Plans and Details as part of task 7.3.3.

7.5 Planting & Irrigation
Mark Thomas will prepare Planting and Irrigation
plans for the 35%, 65%, 95%, 100%, and Final
submittals. a conceptual planting layout plan and a
plant palette for City review prior to proceeding
with the 65% submittal. The following submittal
milestones will incorporate updates based on the
City’s comments on the conceptual planting layout
plan. The planting plans will include a complete
plant layout, plant callouts and notes, and quantity
sheets. Shrubs will be shown with hatch patterns
in the PS&E package.

The irrigation layout will be prepared and will
include irrigation head and valve locations, valve
callouts, and point-of-connection callouts and
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3208 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
20 notes. Lateral line sizing and notation will be
included at the 95% submittal. The irrigation
system is assumed to be a new system connecting
to the existing water meters.

If as-built drawings with sufficient information are
not available, planting and irrigation removal and
repair areas will be identified with callouts only.

It is assumed that the following is required:
Irrigation Notes and Legend (1)
Irrigation Plans (4)
Irrigation Details (2)
Planting Notes and Legend (1)
Planting Plans (4)
Planting Details (1)
Total sheets: 13

7.6 Specifications
Mark Thomas will prepare specifications packages
using the latest APWA Standard Specifications for
Public Works Construction (Greenbook)/Caltrans
Standard Specifications and consistent with the
current City format. We anticipate the City will
provide the boilerplate contract documents to be
included in the specifications package. We will
work with the City on assembling the entire
contract document package. Specifications will be
provided, starting with full special
provisions/technical specifications at the 65%
PS&E submittal. The 95%, 100%, and Final PS&E
submittals will include a response to comments
from subsequent submittals.

7.7 Quantities & Cost Estimates
A cost estimate will be prepared to inform the City
of the upcoming financial obligation and to provide
an engineer’s estimate as a basis for the design.

The estimate will show quantities and unit prices
for each work item along with appropriate
mobilization and contingency costs. For structural
items, Caltrans BEES format will be used. We will
research the latest unit prices available, Caltrans
database information and Caltrans latest
Construction Cost Manual, and consult with the
City on specific prices and use our own information
from other recent bids as available to ensure the
unit prices are current. We will also coordinate and
conduct value engineering study/analysis for any
proposed improvements during the design. The
estimate provided will be updated based on City
comments and market data at the 35%, 65%, 95%,
100%, and Final PS&E submittals that include a
response to comments from subsequent
submittals.

All estimate submittals will be both in excel and
PDF formats with each submittal.

7.8 Construction Schedule
Mark Thomas will provide a detailed CPM method
schedule of construction activities in Microsoft
Project format based upon our assumed staging
plans and design efforts. The initial Construction
Schedule will be supplied at the 65% PS&E
submittal with updates with the 95%, 100%, and
Final PS&E submittals that include a response to
comments from subsequent submittals.

Task Deliverables:
Concept Submittal to SCRRA
Planting Concept
30%/60%/90%/100%/Final Plan and Cost
Estimate Submittals aligned with SCRRA
60%/90%/100% Specifications &
Construction Schedule
Task 8 Railroad & Structural Design

8.1 Track Plans

8.2 SCRRA Rail Bridge

8.2.1 Type Selection
Biggs Cardosa will develop a structure selection
analysis in accordance with §11.6.1 of the SCRRA
Design Criteria Manual for the railroad bridge.

Along with discussing span arrangement,
substructure configuration, etc., constructability will be a primary focus of the Bridge Type Selection
Report. Attachments will include a Bridge General
Plan and a rough order of magnitude construction
cost estimate.

Assumptions:
The Bridge Type Selection Report will be
focused on a single alternative based on
SCRRA concurrence on Limited Work
Windows and Absolute Work Windows
scenarios.
This scope does not anticipate the
preparation of multiple superstructure and
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3209 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
21 substructure alternatives. Rolled steel
beams are assumed to be the most
preferable alternative for SCRRA and the
City, and Type I or Type II CIDH or CISS
foundations will be preferrable over a pile
cap.
One (1) construction staging alternative will
be considered for the Bridge Type
Selection Report. Alternative may include:
1) Piles located outside of tracks to
minimize railroad work windows, 2) piles
located within tracks that would reduce
structure cost but would require longer
Limited Work Windows in addition to
Absolute Work Windows, and 3) an
alternative that could eliminate the need to
use Slide -In Bridge Construction.
The rough order of magnitude construction
cost estimate will be based on estimated
costs per square foot. Detailed quantity
calculations and development of unit prices
are not anticipated for this task.
This scope assumes one (1) round of
review comments from SCRRA and the
City will be provided concurrently, or that
the City will review prior to submission to
SCRRA.

8.2.2 Plan Preparation
Biggs Cardosa will prepare plans and structural
calculations for the railroad bridge. Plans are
anticipated to include a General Plan, General
Notes, Foundation Plan, Bent and Abutment
Layouts, Staged Construction Details, and detail
sheets.

The following sheets (and number of sheets) are
anticipated for the Santa Ana Boulevard
Underpass:
General Plan (1)
Typical Sections (1)
General Notes (2)
Construction Staging (8)
Foundation Plan (1)
Abutment & Bent Layouts and Details (8)
Girder Layout & Details (6)
Bearing Details (2)
Walkway Details (1)
Waterproofing Details (1)
Deck Drain Details (1)
Architectural / Aesthetic Details (2)
Approach Slab Details (2)
Total Sheets: 36
To maintain independence for the check
calculations, Biggs Cardosa recommends that the
65% structural calculations be transmitted to the
City and SCRRA (if required), but the independent
review team should not review until both firms are
ready to reconcile structural calculations.

Assumptions:
The 35% Plans are anticipated to consist of
the General Plan prepared for the Bridge
Type Selection Report and a Foundation
Plan.
This scope assumes that the bridge
drawings will be developed with traditional
2D linework, and Mark Thomas or others
will use the 2D linework to develop 3D
models for visualization purposes.
This scope assumes that the preferred
alternative resulting from Task 8.2.1 is
consistent with the general assumptions in
this Scope of Work, and that the selected
construction staging alternative will consist
of constructing foundations outside of the
tracks and using Slide-In Bridge
Construction methods.
Structural calculations will be prepared in
accordance with AREMA, SCRRA design
criteria, and Caltrans manuals. Structural
calculations will be submitted at the 65%
milestone (Draft), reconciled with the
independent structural check calculations,
and then a Final set of structural
calculations will be prepared. The Final
Structural Calculations will be signed and
sealed by a licensed engineer in the State
of California.
Biggs Cardosa will supply plans and
structural calculations for inclusion in the
SCRRA submittal packages at the Cityspecified milestone submittal (e.g. the 65% plans will be packaged by other into a 60%
SCRRA submittal).
Comments received on a milestone
submittal will be addressed at the
subsequent submittal. This scope does not
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3210 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
22 assume preparation of Draft 65% Plans
and Final 65% Plans, for example.

8.2.3 Independent Check
An independent design check of the rail bridge will
be performed in conformance with Caltrans Bridge
Design and Details Manual and SCRRA standards
and design manuals. Calculations will be
performed to check the bridge layouts and
structural integrity. Upon completion of the
independent check, discrepancies between the
designer and checker will be reconciled for plan
updates in the following submittal.

8.3 Pedestrian Bridge

8.3.1 Type Selection
Mark Thomas will prepare a Structure Type
Selection Report to assist the City in determining
the best suited structure type for the project. The
Type Selection Report will discuss geotechnical,
hydraulic, seismic, constructability, aesthetic,
utility, and drainage issues related to the structure.

A final proposed alternative will be recommended
in the report, which will include a General Plan,
Foundation Plan, and General Plan Estimate for
the recommended alternative.

The pedestrian bridge is assumed to be a twospan, prefabricated steel truss structure. No other bridge superstructure types will be considered.

8.3.2 Plan Preparation
Mark Thomas will prepare structural calculations
and plans for the recommended bridge alternative.

For the purposes of this scope of work, it is
assumed that a two-span, prefabricated steel truss
is the preferred structure alternative. The structure
design will be in accordance with AASHTO LRFD
Guide Specification for the Design of Pedestrian
Bridges, 2nd Edition with the California
Amendments and Caltrans Seismic Design
Criteria, Version 2.1. The 2025 Caltrans Standards
and current versions of the Caltrans Structure
Technical Policies and Bridge Design Manuals will
be used. It is assumed that the following plan
sheets will be prepared:
General Plan (1)
Index to Plans (1)
Deck Contours (1)
Foundation Plan (1)
Abutment Layout (2)
Abutment Details (3)
Bent Layout (1)
Bent Details (3)
Typical Section (1)
Girder Layout (1)
Girder Details (2)
Railing Details (1)
Joint Details (1)
Miscellaneous Details (1)
Log of Test Borings (3)
Total Sheets: 23

8.3.3 Independent Check
Mark Thomas will perform an independent design
check of the pedestrian bridge in conformance with
Caltrans bridge design procedures. The
independent check will be completed by an
engineer who was not involved in the original
design of the structure. Calculations will be
performed to check the bridge layouts and
structural integrity. Upon completion of the
independent check, discrepancies between the
designer and checker will be reconciled and plans
updated.

8.4 Retaining Walls

8.4.1 Plan Preparation
Mark Thomas will prepare structural calculations
and plans for the retaining walls, including
staircase details between retaining walls adjacent
to northwest corner of the Pedestrian
Overcrossing, with the proposed wall type for each
location. For the purposes of this scope of work, it
is assumed that combination of soldier pile walls
and/or secant pile walls (top down construction
method) and a Cast-In-Place (CIP) gravity
cantilever concrete retaining walls (bottom up
construction method) will be utilized for the 6 wall
locations.

The structure design will be in accordance with
AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 8th
Edition with the California Amendments and
SCRRA standards and design manuals. The 2025
Caltrans Standards and current versions of the
Caltrans Structure Technical Policies and Bridge
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3211 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
23 Design Manuals will be used. It is assumed that
the following plan sheets will be prepared:

Retaining Walls Sheet Description
General Plan (1)
Index to Plans (1)
General Notes (1)
Construction Details (1)
Structure Plan (9)
Wall Details (8)
Drainage Layout (2)
Drainage Details (2)
Railing Details (2)
Aesthetic Details (1)
Miscellaneous Details (2)
Log of Test Borings (6)
Total Sheets: 36

8.4.2 Independent Check (non-std walls)
Mark Thomas will perform an independent design
check of the retaining walls in conformance with
Caltrans bridge design procedures. The
independent check will be completed by an
engineer who was not involved in the original
design of the structure. Calculations will be
performed to check the layouts and structural
integrity. Upon completion of the independent
check, discrepancies between the designer and
checker will be reconciled and plans updated.

8.5 Entry Pavilion/Canopy Remodel
Pavilion Structures work consists of removing
existing Entry Pavilion and portion of existing
Canopy structure. Mark Thomas will prepare
structural calculations and plans for the cut and
reface of the canopy structure. For the purposes of
this scope of work, it is assumed that the cut and
reface will match existing and City will provide all
as-built plans for the existing Canopy structure and
Entry Pavilion Structure. The structure design will
be in accordance with California Building Code
(CBC, 2025), California Existing Building Code
(CEBC, 2025) and ASCE 7-22. It is assumed that
the following plan sheets will be prepared:

Pavilion Structure Sheet Description
Structural general notes, design criteria,
special inspections (2)
Structural demolition plan (1)
Demolition details, sequencing, temporary
shoring, and protection notes (1)
Structure Site Plan (1)
Platform Canopy Details (1)
Canopy Foundation Plan and Framing
Plan (1)
Platform and Connection Details (1)
Additional Concrete Details (1)
Additional Canopy Details (2)
Total Sheets: 11
Mark Thomas will perform an independent design
check of the Pavilion Structures in conformance
with CBC, CEBC, and ASCE 7 design
requirements. The independent check will be
completed by an engineer who was not involved in
the original design of the structure. Calculations
will be performed to check the layouts and
structural integrity. Upon completion of the
independent check, discrepancies between the
designer and checker will be reconciled and plans
updated.

8.6 Aesthetics
Structure aesthetics concept design and details will
be prepared during PS&E for bridge and retaining
walls, including up to one (1) plan sheet, one (1)
section sheet and two (2) detail sheets to support
the MT Transportation and Structure Team. The
aesthetic design scope assumes one design per
component, including the bridge barrier, pedestrian
overcrossing barrier, fence, and retaining walls.

8.7 Geotechnical Investigation & Report
Geotechnical design shall be conducted in
conformance with current City, Caltrans, and
SCRRA standards, design manuals, and
requirements.

Consultant shall conduct a site visit to observe the
topography and visualize the proposed
improvements at the project location. Consultant
shall review available subsurface data from nearby
structures or published geologic maps, to
determine general subsurface conditions at the
project site. Geotechnical borings shall be
performed by the Consultant.

Consultant shall provide geotechnical, geologic
and seismic design recommendations. Consultant
shall provide geotechnical and foundation
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3212 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
24 recommendations for roadway, bridges, retaining
walls, and other structures as required.

Consultant shall prepare a preliminary
geotechnical report with information gathered
during the site visit and review of existing
subsurface data, geotechnical borings, results
obtained from the alternative analysis and the
preliminary bridge and retaining wall foundation
data.

Consultant shall prepare and submit a geotechnical
review and exploration plan for the City to review.

Consultant shall obtain right-of-entry permits prior
to exploration. Geotechnical borings within the
railroad ROW or adjacent with the potential to foul
the tracks will require SCRRA review with right of
entry permit, training, and flagging. To reduce the
delay in permitting and flagging time, borings will
be placed outside of the railroad ROW.

Consultant shall conduct subsurface investigation
per AASHTO requirement and evaluate the results
in accordance with specified testing criteria.

AASHTO requires a soil boring at each bridge
support location where substructure width is less
than 100 feet; minimum of two borings are required
per location where substructure width is greater
than 100 feet. Since the bridge substructure width,
measured from one edge of the pedestrian bridge
to the other edge of the railroad bridge, is less than
100 feet, one set of borings is sufficient for both
bridges.

For retaining walls, a soil boring is required every
100 to 200 feet. For pavement, a boring shall be
performed every 500 to 750 feet. Based on this
information, consultant’s geotechnical field
investigations plan is presented in the table below.

The proposed approximate boring depths will be
raised if refusal is encountered. The boreholes will
be excavated using a truck-mounted or trackmounted drilling rig. Asphalt concrete cold-patch will be used to replace asphalt that is removed by
excavations. Consultant shall analyze the results
and present them in the geotechnical report. The
geotechnical report shall be prepared to include
recommendations for design and construction of
bridge foundations, earth retaining structures, cut
and fill slopes, pavement, and drainage facilities
Results obtained from the field and laboratory
testing shall be used to establish an idealized soil
profile and strength parameters for bridge and
retaining wall foundation design, and slope stability
and settlement calculations for the approaches.

Consultant shall provide information on
remediation measures if the site soils are corrosive
to concrete or steel structures. R-value shall be
used to determine composite pavement structural
sections using Traffic Indices.
.

Design Element Number of
Borings
Approximate
Depth (feet)
Rail Bridge and 2 125
Pedestrian Bridge 2 175
Retaining Walls 3 30 – 60
Roadway
Improvements 3 5 – 10
A qualified geotechnical engineer shall prepare a
Geotechnical Report for foundation design of the
bridges, retaining walls, pump station, and
roadway pavement and embankment. Sufficient
borings and material samples shall be taken to
determine the road structural section and slope
stability. Consultant shall propose a Traffic Index
(TI) for the all lanes and obtain City concurrence. It
shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to
notify Underground Service Alert and provide
traffic control. Consultant shall tie position of
boring locations, with elevation.

The Foundation Report shall also include:
Nature of materials found on the site.
Liquefaction potential.
Any geological hazards that may exist and
recommend mitigation measures.
Seismic design data in accordance with
Caltrans / AREMA seismic design criteria.

It shall be assured that the design parameters and
potential construction difficulties are identified and
addressed, together with the proper mitigation
measures in the Geotechnical Report. For the
bridge structure, alternative types of foundations
shall be evaluated to insure the selection of the
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3213 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
25 most suitable type of foundation. A log of Test
Borings sheet shall be prepared and included as
part of the report and as part of the structure plans.

This Log of Test Borings sheet shall be prepared in
accordance with Caltrans Standard Procedures.
Laboratory Testing – Bulk and disturbed /
undisturbed samples shall be selected for
laboratory testing. All tests shall be
conducted in accordance with Caltrans
Test Methods or ASTM Standards.
Engineering Analyses – Results obtained
from the field and laboratory investigation
program shall be used to establish
idealized soil profiles and design soil
parameters for bridge foundation design.

Assumptions
No permit fee was assumed for the City
encroachment permit. $3,000 was allocated
for County well permits.
Railroad entry permit, railroad insurance,
and flagging are not needed.
Private property permits and access will be
provided by others.
Site-specific traffic control plans are not
required; CA MUTCD will be used for traffic
control plans.
No time-history or site-specific ground
response analyses.
Borings will be patched with rapid set
concrete with black dye to replace asphalt
that is removed by excavations; no hot
mix/sawcut repair.

Task 8 Deliverables:
Concept Submittal “A” to SCRRA
30%/60%/90%/100%/Final Plan and Cost
Estimate Submittals aligned with SCRRA
submittals “B” through “E”.
60%/90%/100% Specifications &
Construction Schedule
Aesthetic Concepts
Draft and Final Geotechnical Report
Task 9 Right of Way

9.1 R/W Requirements Map

9.2 Legal Descriptions & Plats
Mark Thomas will prepare up to twenty (20) legal
descriptions and plat map exhibits for required real
property interests, including but not limited to any
temporary construction easement and/or right or
entry agreements. Legal descriptions and plats to
be prepared under the responsible charge of a
California Licensed Professional Land Surveyor.

Assumptions
Upon changes from coordination with
corresponding agencies or due to
construction, up to two (2) revision rounds
will be made to each legal description and
plat map. Revisions to be minor geometric
or dimension changes only.

Task Deliverables
Twenty (20) Legal Description & Plat Map
Exhibits and traverse closure calculations
in PDF format

9.3 Appraisal Maps
Utilizing the completed landnet basemap will help
establish existing rights necessary for planning
acquisition needs. Mark Thomas will utilize ArcMap
GIS to create a consolidated database of
ownership and potential acquisition areas. An
Appraisal Map Exhibit will be produced, showing
proposed acquisitions overlaid on aerial imagery.

These exhibits are designed to be clear and easily
understood by appraisers, land agents, and
property owners. It is assumed that a single plan
sheet covering the project limits will be prepared.

9.4 Appraisal Services
Title Reports
Monument will procure preliminary title reports and
copies of all underlying documents for each
property to determine present ownership,
encumbrances affecting the subject property, and
matters to be cleared and taken “subject to” as part
of the transaction. Monument will perform the
following:

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3214 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
26 Order and examine Preliminary Title
Reports/Litigation Guaranties, determine
title deficiencies, develop a plan to resolve
and cure title deficiencies, and clear liens
and encumbrances.
Deliver all necessary documents to the title
and escrow companies and shall be
responsible for the preparation and
completion of such documents. Monument
will be responsible for managing and
monitoring the title and escrow companies
to ensure timely delivery.
Assist the City, its consultants, and agents
in resolving issues affecting marketable title
to properties through, among other things,
recordation of corrective instruments and/or
other appropriate means.
Provide necessary assistance to the City to
clear exceptions stated in the preliminary
title report unless waived by the City in
writing.
Record releases of deeds of trust, grant
deeds, certificates of acceptance, and other
related documents required with respect to
the transfer of each property.

Upon completion of the project, provide the Policy
of Title insurance; the cost of such will be paid
directly by the City through escrow.

Deliverables
Up to 11 Title reports
Assumptions:
The title report for the County of Orange
(OC Public Works Facilities Operations) is
to be combined into a single title report.
A separate Title Report for the railroad is
required.

Appraisals
All appraisals and appraisal reviews used for the
acquisition of real property will be prepared in
accordance with 49 CFR Part 24 and the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice
(USPAP). A single self-contained appraisal report
will be prepared for each property acquisition that
will contain relevant project-related data, subject
property information, market comparables, and an
analysis of the appraiser’s value conclusions.

During the appraisal process, Monument will be
responsible for the following tasks:
Prepare appraisal scope, fee, and schedule
for each property.
Prepare and deliver appraisal notices to
property owners.
Conduct field reviews of property with
appraiser.
Make weekly contact with appraisers to
update progress.
Review appraisal reports for quality and
accuracy.

Appraisals will be prepared in accordance with
USPAP requirements, and will contain the
following:
Adequate description of the physical
characteristics of the property being
appraised (and, in the case of a partial
acquisition, an adequate description of the
remainder).
Any identified personal property.
Statement of any known or observed
encumbrances and the location, zoning,
present use, and year sales history of the
property.
An analysis of the property’s highest and
best use.
All relevant approaches to value are
consistent with established federal
appraisal practices. If more than one
approach is used, there will be an analysis
and reconciliation of the approaches to
support the appraiser’s opinion of value.
A listing and analysis of comparable sales,
including a description of all relevant
physical, legal, and economic factors such
as parties to the transaction, source, and
method of financing, and verification by a
party involved in the transaction.
A statement of the value of the real
property interest to be acquired and, for a
partial acquisition, a statement of the value
of the damages and benefits, if any, to the
remaining real property, where
appropriate.

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3215 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
27 The effective date of valuation and the date
of the appraisal report, with a signed
certification of the appraiser.

Deliverables:
Up to 12 appraisal reports.

Assumptions:
Appraisal mapping and legal descriptions &
plat maps to be provided by others.
Appraisal fees may vary based on actual
market rates at the time of assignment.

Appraisal Review
Review appraisals will be provided for each
appraisal, in accordance with State and Federal
law and City policy as required. The review
appraiser will, as appropriate:
Identify the intended users and use of the
review, and the purpose of the
assignment.
Identify the following for each appraisal
under review:
Appraiser and firm who completed
the assignment.
Subject property.
Effective date of the appraisal and
opinion of value.
Property and ownership interest
appraised.
Identify the scope of work to be performed.
Develop an opinion as to the completeness
of the material under review, given the
scope of work applicable in the
assignment.
Develop an opinion as to the apparent
adequacy and relevance of the data and
the propriety of any adjustments to the
data, given the scope of work applicable in
the assignment.
Develop an opinion as to the
appropriateness of the appraisal methods
and techniques used, given the scope of
work applicable in the assignment, and
develop the reasons for any disagreement.
Develop an opinion as to whether the
analyses, opinions, and conclusions are
appropriate and reasonable, given the
scope of work applicable in the assignment,
and develop the reasons for any
disagreement.
Review appraisals will be forwarded to the
City for the establishment of just
compensation prior to the preparation of
offers to acquire the proposed land rights
for the project.

Deliverables:
Up to 12 appraisal reviews.

Fixtures and Equipment Appraisal
In providing fixtures and equipment appraisal
services to the City, Monument will oversee
Desmond Marcello & Amster (DMA) to provide the
following:
Communicate with the City to ascertain the
scope of the assignment.
Coordinate with real estate appraiser,
relocation agents, acquisition agents, and
attorneys.
Prepare a complete inventory of the assets
at the subject business location. This
inventory includes the make, model, and
serial number (if applicable) of all items, a
description of the assets, as well as an
observation of their age, condition, method
of installation (if applicable), and
photographs.
Review any documentation related to the
assets provided by the business owner
and/or manager, including invoices,
depreciation schedules, and construction
contracts.
Interview business owners and/or
managers.
Research the marketplace for each of the
assets identified on-site. Such research
includes reference to a variety of
publications, as well as discussions with
individuals knowledgeable about the
market for the assets.
Coordinate with other appraisers to avoid
duplication of compensation.
Apply valuation methods, including the
Market Approach and Cost Approach, to
the subject assets.
Prepare the appraisal report for
submission, including replacement cost
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3216 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
28 new, depreciated value, and salvage value
in place.
Maintain files in accordance with USPAP
and Caltrans Right-of-way Manual; and
Provide expert testimony and litigation
support, as required.

Deliverables:
Up to 7 FF&E appraisal reports
Assumptions:
Fees for FFE Appraisal Reports are
estimated based on the currently available
limited information. Additional Appraisals
may be required, which may result in
additional fees.

9.5 Acquisition Services
Based on our understanding of the project and the
information provided by the City, Monument
assumes that the Project will require the
acquisition of property rights from up to 14 owners,
including two billboard owners. Monument will
provide all services required for the City to acquire
the right-of-way necessary for the construction of
the Project. All tasks will be performed in
accordance with applicable Federal, State, and
local regulations, as well as the City’s internal
policies and procedures. Specifically, Monument
will:
Coordinate and manage the acquisition
process with the City, legal counsel, design
team, property owners, and tenants, along
with the title company, appraisers, and
other consultants to ensure effective crossdiscipline communications. Review right-of-way plans, appraisal
reports, title reports, appraisal maps, legal
descriptions, and all other pertinent
documents.
Prepare acquisition offer packages
consisting of the City’s written purchase
offer, appraisal summary statement,
acquisition brochure, acquisition
agreement, conveying instruments (Grant
Deed, Permanent and/or Temporary
Easements, etc.), Certificate of
Acceptance, recommendation of Just
Compensation, plat maps and legal
descriptions, and Title VI Information.
Monument’s acquisition agent will attempt
to meet personally with each property
owner to present the offer and discuss the
acquisition process.
Negotiate in good faith with each property
owner or their agent or representative and
address any questions or concerns that
may arise during the acquisition process.
Establish and maintain an acquisition file
for each property owner and maintain a file
checklist pursuant to the City’s
specifications.
Promptly transmit executed documents to
the City for acceptance and processing.
If necessary, prepare and submit a Letter of
Recommendation for any proposed
administrative settlements, which will
include a chronology of the negotiation
efforts, and provide supporting
documentation and an explanation of the
rationale behind the recommendation.
Escrow Coordination – Serving as liaison
between the City and the title company, we
will facilitate the opening of escrows, assist
the escrow company in obtaining any
necessary additional documentation,
supervise and review the closing of
escrows, and review closing statements for
completeness and accuracy.
Our primary goal is to reach an agreement
with each property owner, and we will
collaborate with the City to develop
solutions that achieve this goal. Should
negotiations reach an impasse, we will
provide a written recommendation for
condemnation action, including all required
justification and supporting documentation.
Provide bilingual acquisition agents as
needed.
Upon project completion, completed
acquisition files will be provided
electronically for each impacted owner.

Deliverables:
Up to 11 executed Agreements and
Deeds/Easements.

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3217 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
29 Assumptions:
90 Day negotiating period from the date of
the first written offer.
One offer package per impacted
property/owner.
Does not contain fees for condemnation
support or utility coordination.
The County of Orange (OC Public Works
Facilities Operations Division) property is
combined into one acquisition
Tenant Acquisition
For acquisitions that result in the need to acquire
non-residential tenant interests, including
Improvements Pertaining to the Realty, fixtures &
equipment, leasehold improvements and/or an
interest in the property to be acquired, Monument
will prepare and present an unsegregated offer to
the tenants shortly after presenting an offer
package to the property owner. As needed, we will
also:
Obtain and review lease agreements
Determine any possessory interests to be
relinquished
Facilitate discussions regarding the
apportionment of just compensation
Perform Uniform Commercial Code filings
and bulk sale transfers
Prepare all required agreements, offset
statements, Estoppel Certificates, and
deeds
Deliverables:
Tenant Acquisition for up to 15 Tenants
Business Relocation
Based on information provided by the City,
Monument assumes that the Project will require
the relocation of up to 5 businesses, one personal
property move, and two billboards. Monument will
ensure that displaced businesses promptly receive
advisory services and relocation benefits in
accordance with the Uniform Relocation and Real
Property Acquisition Act; the California Relocation
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition
Guidelines; the Caltrans Right-of-Way Manual; and
the City’s internal policies and procedures, as
applicable. Monument will:
Prepare a Relocation Plan in accordance
with applicable guidelines.
Meet personally with each prospective
displacee to ascertain the nature and scope
of relocation assistance required, to inform
the displacees of their rights, and to explain
the relocation process.
Determine each displacee’s eligibility for
relocation assistance; prepare an estimated
timeline for relocation and prepare an
estimate of the amount of relocation
benefits to which each displace is eligible.
Prepare all applicable claim forms, secure
claimant’s signatures on claim forms, and
submit forms to the City for review,
acceptance, and payment.
Conduct appropriate searches for
relocation replacement sites and provide
relocation site referrals to displacees.
Perform any other normal procedures and
processes to implement the relocation
assignment and provide any other
supporting information and correspondence
required by the City.
Prepare and deliver a Notice of Relocation
Eligibility to the business owner.
Prepare a complete inventory of personal
property and trade fixtures and assist the
business owner to obtain at least two bids
from licensed and bonded moving
companies.
Monitor each move to ensure compliance
with all regulations and agreements.
Assist the displaced business in obtaining
all documentation necessary to receive
entitlements.
Maintain a detailed diary of all contacts
made and services provided to the
displaced business.
Calculate and review all relocation benefit
amounts and allowances.

Deliverables:
Relocation assistance services for up to 5
businesses, one personal property moves,
and two billboards.

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3218 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
30 Assumptions:
Number of impacted businesses is
estimated. Additional fees may be required
if multiple businesses are found to be
operating within the same building or unit.
Referrals to impacted businesses will be
provided every two (2) weeks, as available,
for a period of up to eight (8) months from
the date of issuance of the Notice of
Eligibility.
Does not contain fees for payment of
security deposits, moving services, or
eligible relocation benefits.
Fees for Business Relocation Assistance
are estimated based on current available
information. Additional Relocations may be
required, which may result in additional
fees.

Escrow Coordination
Once an offer has been accepted and the
purchase agreement approved by the City,
Monument will coordinate escrow and title
activities to support the timely and compliant
closeout of the acquisition. This process includes
the following steps:
Transmit original executed acquisition
documents to the escrow company and
request an updated Preliminary Title Report
from the title company
Review the updated title report and prepare
a memorandum identifying any
disapproved title exceptions
Coordinate with the escrow company as
escrow instructions are prepared and
transmitted, including delivery of the
purchase contract to the title company
Support escrow in satisfying monetary
liens, prorating taxes, and clearing adverse
title exceptions and encumbrances
Coordinate with the City for the deposit of
estimated closing funds into escrow upon
escrow’s request
Provide ongoing support to the escrow
officer to facilitate the execution of escrow
instructions, title clearance documentation,
and the processing of wire transfers
Confirm recordation of deeds and issuance
of title insurance policies upon close of
escrow
Deliverables
Escrow Coordination for up to 13
transactions
Certification
Monument will assist the City with the preparation
and submission of all required Caltrans Right-ofWay Certification forms and supporting documents. Monument will coordinate with
Caltrans staff to address any questions or
concerns and will assist the City to ensure the
ultimate acceptance and approval of the
Certification. Specifically, Monument will:
Draft, review and revise Right-of-Way
Certification forms.
Compile and submit all supporting property
acquisition, relocation, and other applicable
documents.
If necessary, coordinate with relevant
parties to compile and submit utility
coordination back-up documents.
Coordinate with Caltrans staff to facilitate
the timely review and approval of
Certification.
Coordinate and attend up to 3 meetings
with Caltrans staff to review and discuss
Certification forms and/or supporting
documentation.
Hold up to 3 meetings with the project team
to monitor certification progress and
schedule.

Deliverables:
Approved and accepted Caltrans Exhibit
13-B (Right-of-Way Certification) or
equivalent required Caltrans forms.

9.6 Property Management Services
Monument provides comprehensive property
management and maintenance services following
acquisition to support the City through the
transition from occupancy to demolition or
construction. Our team conducts initial property
inspections, confirms occupancy status, and
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3219 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
31 oversees all aspects of the site. Services include
coordinating utility transfers and disconnections,
facilitating short-term rental agreements, collecting
rent, and issuing notices to vacate in accordance
with state law. We review and update existing
leases and agreements, prepare new agreements
for the City’s approval, and coordinate with escrow
companies for the transfer of leases, rents, and
security deposits. Monument also maintains
detailed tenant databases and submits weekly
status reports that summarize key property details,
including tenancy, rent, notices issued, vacancy
dates, and demolition timelines.

To ensure each property is secure and maintained
while awaiting demolition or construction,
Monument provides full interim management
services. This includes site security such as
fencing and board-up, vendor coordination for
property maintenance, graffiti and nuisance
abatement, utility account setup and payments,
and trust account establishment for collected rents
and deposits. Our team coordinates access for
inspections, oversees hazardous materials testing
and abatement, and manages demolition activities
including removal of underground storage tanks
and compliance with environmental regulations.

Monument ensures all properties are
professionally managed and transitioned in full
compliance with local, state, and federal
requirements.

Property Management fees (up to six months)
include, per parcel:
Fees up to six months of property
management service, including
coordination of rent collection and
coordination with the City. All rent
payments to be payable directly to City.
One board up service.
One weed abatement service.
One graffiti cleanup service.
One trash removal/property cleanup
service (excludes hazardous materials).
Security service to consist of one unarmed
guard performing one daily physical patrol
and inspection.
Bi-monthly pest control services.
Landscaping services.
One-time set up and removal of security
fencing, if needed. The fee assumes 100
linear feet of fencing for a six-month period.
One-time locksmith/rekeying service.
Security Measures: Fee includes the option
of one security measure (security, fencing,
or board-up) per parcel.

Deliverables:
Property management for up to 4
Properties
Assumptions:
All direct costs associated with the
subconsultant property management
services are not included in the subject
fees and are to be paid via the trust
account or directly by the City.
The scope and fees of property
management do not include the initiation or
management of trust accounts.
Fees for Property Management are
estimated based on available information.

Additional property Management may be
required.

9.7 Business Goodwill Appraisals
Monument’s business goodwill appraiser will
perform the necessary research, investigation, and
analysis to provide written appraisal reports in
compliance with the standards of the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice
(USPAP) as it pertains to business valuations.

Goodwill work will encompass steps including, but
not limited to, the following:
Communicate with the City and/or
representatives to ascertain the scope of
the assignment and provide responsive
proposals for each task order.
Communicate with the subject business
and/or representatives to commence the
data gathering process.
Review and analyze the financial
statements of the subject business,
including internal income statements and
balance sheets as well as tax returns.
Interview the owners and/or managers of
the subject business, and/or review
deposition transcripts. Such
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3220 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
32 interviews/depositions are intended to
provide the appraiser with a thorough
understanding of the business’s products,
operations, management, employees,
marketing, competition, and industry, as
well as an understanding of recent financial
trends and outlook.
Conduct site and area inspections of both
the subject location and the business
relocation site, if applicable.
Review leases and other contracts
pertinent to the business operations.
Coordinate with other professionals, such
as fixtures and equipment appraisers, real
estate appraisers, and relocation
consultants, to avoid duplication of
compensation.
Research the business industry, economic
factors affecting the business, and the
marketplace for sales of businesses similar
to the subject.
Investigate the impacts of the taking and/or
relocation, if applicable, on the business’s
revenues and profits in the “after”
condition, taking into consideration
potential betterment.
Implement valuation methods, such as the
Income Approach (i.e., Discounted Cash
Flow Method, Capitalization of Cash Flow
Method) and Market Approach (i.e.,
Discretionary Cash Flow Multiplier Method,
EBITDA Multiplier Method), to determine
the value of the business’ goodwill in both
the before condition and in the after
condition.
Prepare a valuation report in compliance
with USPAP.
Attend any required meetings or
conferences with the client to address
appraisal-related questions.

Deliverables:
Up to 2 Billboard Goodwill Appraisals
Up to 3 Business Goodwill Appraisals
Task Deliverables:
R/W Requirements Map
Legal Descriptions & Plats
Appraisal Maps & Appraisals
Acquisition Documents
Task 10 Utility Coordination
This task continues utility coordination through the
final design, includes coordination of utility
relocation design and schedule, and supporting the
agreements.

10.1 Ongoing Utility Coordination

10.2 Utility Notifications & Conflicts

10.3 Utility Agreement Support (Optional)
Task Deliverables:
Meeting Agendas, Minutes & Exhibits
Utility Notifications B&C, Response Log
Conflict Matrix
Task 11 Traffic Management Plan
Fehr & Peers will prepare a Traffic Management
Plan (TMP) to provide continuous traffic circulation
and access, with space for safe and efficient
construction. The TMP will be coordinated with
project stakeholders to include but not be limited
to:

1. Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA)

2. Southern California Regional Rail Authority
(SCRRA)

3. California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC)

4. California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans)

5. Businesses

6. Local neighborhood associations, and

7. Other public or private agencies/utilities or
parties.

The development of the staged construction and
traffic detours, closures or alterations to traffic
patterns will be included. The plan will detail the
use of temporary traffic control devices, such as
cones, drums, barricades, and signs, all of which
will comply with the California MUTCD. Any
temporary roadway will be engineered to the same
design standards as new construction, including
alignment, pavement, markings, and
pedestrian/bicycle facilities.

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3221 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
33 The TMP shall be developed according to Caltrans
TMP Guidelines. TMP strategies include:

1. Project Description

2. Public Information

3. Motorist Information

4. Incident Management

5. Construction Strategies

6. Demand Management

7. Alternate Routes (or Detours)

8. Layout Sheets

9. Typical Cross Sections

10. Project Schedule
The Construction scenario in the Traffic/Circulation
Study Update is anticipated to evaluate the
corridor with one lane in each direction. However,
it assumed that some minor weekend and some
lengthier full closures will be required due to
staging. Fehr & Peers will coordinate with Caltrans
related to full closures and potential impacts to I-5
ramps. This scope of work assumes that a brief
technical memorandum will provide enough
evidence that traffic volumes at Santa Ana
Boulevard and adjacent I-5 interchanges are not
high enough to warrant a full detour assessment.

Task Deliverables:
Draft and Final TMP
Task 12 Agreements & Permits
The necessary third party permits for the design
and construction will be obtained.

12.1 CPUC GO 88-B

12.2 SCRRA Rights of Entry

12.3 Caltrans Encroachment Permit

12.4 C&M Agreement Support
Task Deliverables:
Draft and Final GO 88-B
SCRRA Right of Entry (DES)
SCRRA Right of Entry (CON)
Caltrans Encroachment Permit (DES)
Caltrans Encroachment Permit (CON)
C&M Agreement Supporting Documents
Task 13 Bid & Construction Support
Support will continue through the bid and
construction phases of the project.

13.1 Bid Support

13.2 Conformed Documents

13.3 Construction Support
Task Deliverables:
Response to Contractor RFIs
Contract Bid Review
Review of Shop Drawings & Submittals
Construction Change Request Review
Additional Drawings/Exhibits
As-Built Documents
Task 14 Optional Tasks
Additional services may be provided under this
task on an as-needed basis.

14.1 Construction Staking
Mark Thomas will provide one set of construction
stakes or offset staking as directed by the
Contractor or the City of Santa Ana. Construction
staking services will be performed in accordance
with the work as outlined in Chapter 12 of the
Caltrans Surveys Manual; Construction Surveys
and will consist of construction survey services,
including field surveys and the necessary office
support to coordinate staking requirements with
the Resident Engineer.

Mark Thomas will coordinate field staking with the
Contactor and/or the City of Santa Ana. Field
staking will begin two working days after receipt of
staking request, assuming all clarifications and the
area is ready for staking. Mark Thomas will
prepare and maintain a spreadsheet tracking all
written staking requests, dates of requests, dates
of staking and all notes (cut sheets) regarding the
staking.

Assumptions
Restaking due to lost or destroyed stakes
will be performed as approved by the
Contactor and will be compensated as
extra work.

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3222 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
34 For the purposes of this proposal, one crew
mobilization shall be defined as one day of
continuous, uninterrupted staking effort to
complete a staking priority.
After a survey request is received and if the
survey field crews are mobilized to an area
that is not ready for stakes, the Contractor
will be charged a minimum of 4 hours of
field crew time as an extra above the
contracted amount.
Mark Thomas will receive a 3-week lookahead schedule of operations and time estimates and discuss staking
needs/operations with Contractor
It is assumed stakes will be used within
three working days of being set in order to
preserve the integrity of the staking.
Staking will be conducted in the order
received, unless other priorities are given.
If the staking provided appears to have
discrepancies or is ambiguous, a request
for clarification must be received within 24
hours of the time of staking.

14.2 Monumentation

14.2.1 Record of Survey
Mark Thomas to prepare a pre-construction
Record of Survey and submit to the Orange
County Surveyor’s office for review. Mark Thomas
to compile all boundary retracement data into a
Record of Survey as required per the California
Land Surveyor’s Act (Business and Professions
Code §§ 8700 – 8805) Section 8762. The Record
of Survey will show all lines, pertinent
measurements delineated in the LandNet base
map, found monuments and reference
monuments/ties to be set, if any. We anticipate
one round of review comments from the County.

Deliverables
Record of Survey to be recorded with the
County of Orange (PDF)

14.2.2 Post Construction Monument
Restoration
Post-construction, Mark Thomas to reestablish/restore up to twenty (20) durable monuments via ties and previous found
monumentation/control. Mark Thomas to document
restored monumentation and prepare a postconstruction Record of Survey and submit to the Orange County Surveyor’s office for review. Mark
Thomas to compile all boundary retracement data
into a Record of Survey as required per the
California Land Surveyor’s Act (Business and
Professions Code §§ 8700 – 8805) Section 8762.

The Record of Survey will show all lines, pertinent
measurements delineated in the LandNet base
map, found monuments and reference
monuments/ties to be set, if any. We anticipate
one round of review comments from the County.

Task Deliverables
Record of Survey to be recorded with the
County of Orange (PDF)

14.3 Additional Community Outreach
Virtual Community Meeting
To increase public awareness, an additional (1x),
virtual community meeting may be held at the start
of the project. This fifth community meeting would
be held during the first community meeting round,
providing a second meeting option for the public to
engage with the Project. Lead logistics and
facilitate an online meeting using Zoom or a similar
platform providing convenience for greater public
participation. This meeting would also be recorded
and posted online as a resource for the interested
parties as well as shared via email and social
media to increase the reach of messaging at the
start. Holding both, a virtual and an in-person
meeting at the start may also offer insight into how
people wish to be engaged in subsequent
meetings, providing a level of confidence in the
efforts thereafter.

Community & Pop-Up Events
Prior to two (2) public meetings, the Team will go
to the public, participating in up to a total of four
(4x) scheduled community events or host pop- up
table events. Events will help to reach those
without internet access and build awareness,
educate the public, and encourage participation in
the meeting and comment process, ensuring
outreach is accessible to residents who may not
attend traditional meetings.

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3223 5/5/2026

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Revision 1 – 04/02/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
35 Spot Canvassing
If the City believes it beneficial, conduct up to one
(1x) round of door-to-door canvassing with
targeted businesses and residents that may be
directly impacted by the proposed improvements.

This tactic can be especially useful in on-boarding
key stakeholders into the process early, ensuring
no surprises later in the development process.

Stakeholder feedback will be documented and will
coordinate follow-up actions with the City and
consultant team to ensure issues are tracked and
addressed in a timely manner.

Community Surveys
Develop and administer up to two (2x) bilingual,
English and Spanish community surveys using a
Typeform or similar online preference survey
platform to support community input at key stages
of the Project. The first survey may be deployed
during the initial round of engagement to help build
project awareness and understand existing travel
patterns, corridor use, and community concerns.

The second survey may be distributed during the
design phase of work to gather feedback on design
features, access considerations, and community
priorities that support design refinement. If utilized, survey notification campaigns will be coordinated
to occur in tandem with planned community
meeting outreach efforts for efficiency. Surveys will
be made available online and in print format for
use at in-person engagements, with AA
responsible for staff entry of any print survey
responses. Survey results will be compiled through
high-level analysis, including multi-language
findings, and summarized through infographic-style
materials. Infographics will be shared electronically
through eblasts, subsequent public engagements,
and posted to the project website to support
transparency and public access.

Innovative & Inclusive Engagement Tools
In-house Innovations Team and Justice Equity
Diversity and Inclusion (JEDI) Team are available
to provide additional, optional support and/or
creative and interactive solutions should there be
project demand, such as videography, GIS
solutions, or CBO Partnerships should the City
require a greater degree of public engagement.

14.4 Caltrans Detour Assessment
If a full detour assessment will is requested by
Caltrans due to the proximity to the I-5
interchange, Fehr & Peers has provided optional
scope to complete the required analysis. Traffic
analysis to support the project will be prepared
along detour routes and will include adjacent I-5
interchange ramp terminal intersections at Penn
Way and 4th Street, and will include the corridors
of Penn Way/Santiago Street, Santa Ana
Boulevard, Grand Avenue and 4th Street and
includes up to 15 study intersections.

Traffic forecasts will be prepared using the same
procedures as the Traffic/Circulation Study,
utilizing OCTAM and new turning movement
counts collected at the time of the TMP. Traffic
analysis will be prepared using Synchro Software
for peak hour conditions. A draft plan will be
submitted for City and Caltrans review and we
assume up to two rounds of responses to
comments and submission as final.

14.5 Utility Agreements
If deemed necessary, Mark Thomas will assist in
the preparation of utility agreements for any third
part utility that the City has full or partial cost
liability for the relocation costs.

14.6 Design Exceptions – Caltrans
Our team will coordinate with Caltrans regarding
any existing non-standard design features at the I5 ramp intersection. It is not expected that this grade separation project will create any new nonstandard features that would require a Design Standard Design Document (DSDD) to be
prepared.

14.7 Metrolink – Additional Support Services
In Task 3.2, a budgetary amount of effort has been
provided for the coordination with Metrolink. If
additional support above that budget is required
due to prolonged coordination and approvals by
Metrolink, this task will provide additional budget
necessary for continued coordination efforts.

14.8 Caltrans Traffic Signal Modification
A traffic signal modification plan will be provided at
the Santa Ana Boulevard/I-5 Southbound Ramps
(Caltrans) intersection.

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3224 5/5/2026

ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐDĂŶĂŐĞƌ
^ƌ͘WƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌ
^ƌ͘dĞĐŚŶŝĐĂů>ĞĂĚ
WƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌ
dĞĐŚŶŝĐĂů>ĞĂĚ
^ƌ͘WƌŽũĞĐƚ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ
WƌŽũĞĐƚ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ
ĞƐŝŐŶ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ//
ĞƐŝŐŶ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ/
^ƌ͘dĞĐŚŶŝĐŝĂŶ
>hŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ
DĂŶĂŐĞƌ
>hWƌŽũĞĐƚ
DĂŶĂŐĞƌ
>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĞƐŝŐŶĞƌ//
>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĞƐŝŐŶĞƌ/
^ƵƌǀĞǇŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ
DĂŶĂŐĞƌ
^ƵƌǀĞǇDĂŶĂŐĞƌ//
WƌŽũĞĐƚ^ƵƌǀĞǇŽƌ//
ƐƐƚ^ƵƌǀĞǇŽƌ//
^ƵƌǀĞǇ^ƉĞĐŝĂůŝƐƚ//
^ƵƌǀĞǇdĞĐŚŶŝĐŝĂŶ//
^h
WƌŽŐƌĂŵ
DĂŶĂŐĞƌ
hƚŝůŝƚǇ>ŽĐĂƚŽƌ
;^ŽƵƚŚͿ
ϮͲWĞƌƐŽŶƌĞǁ;K
ϭϮͿ
WƌŽũĞĐƚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚ
^ƌ͘WƌŽũĞĐƚ
ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŽƌ
^ƌ͘'ƌĂƉŚŝĐDĂŶĂŐĞƌ
^ƌ͘'ƌĂƉŚŝĐĞƐŝŐŶĞƌ
'ƌĂƉŚŝĐĞƐŝŐŶĞƌ
^ƵƌǀĞǇŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŽƌ
Z
>>EK
/''^ZK^
/͕zKhZDE͕Θ
^^K

Zd,D
,E/
&
,ZΘW

Z^
/&
DKEhD
EdZKt
d
dZd
,

W,zZZ/>
Ψϯϰϴ ΨϮϴϵ ΨϮϲϯ ΨϮϮϵ ΨϮϭϴ Ψϭϵϴ Ψϭϲϰ Ψϭϯϯ ΨϭϭϬ Ψϭϲϳ ΨϮϴϯ ΨϮϬϰ Ψϭϭϯ Ψϴϱ Ψϯϱϰ ΨϮϱϴ ΨϮϬϵ Ψϭϯϯ Ψϭϱϵ Ψϭϭϲ ΨϮϲϬ ΨϮϯϱ Ψϯϵϯ Ψϭϯϯ Ψϭϰϳ ΨϭϵϮ Ψϭϯϵ ΨϭϭϬ ΨϭϬϴ Wt ϭ͘Ϭ WƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚΘĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶϭ͘ϭ WƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚͬĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ ϭϱϲ ϳϮ ϳϮ ϳϮ ϭϬϰ ϰϳϲ Ψϭϭϲ͕ϰϵϮ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϭϲ͕ϰϵϮ ϭ͘Ϯ YDWͬWDW ϰϬ ϰϬ ϴϬ ΨϮϯ͕Ϭϵϳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮϯ͕Ϭϵϳ ϭ͘ϯ WƌŽũĞĐƚDĞĞƚŝŶŐƐ ϳϮ ϯϲ ϲ ϳϮ ϭϰϰ ϴ ϮϮ ϲ ϯϲϲ Ψϴϰ͕ϲϭϱ ϰ͕ϴϳϴ ϭϲ͕ϯϮϬ Ͳ Ͳ ϯ͕ϵϰϬ ϲ͕ϵϯϮ Ͳ ϭϬ͕ϳϵϳ ϭϬ͕ϵϭϮ Ψϭϯϴ͕ϯϵϰ ϭ͘ϰ WƌŽŐƌĞƐƐZĞƉŽƌƚŝŶŐ Ϯϰ ϯϲ ϲϬ Ψϭϲ͕ϲϬϵ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϲ͕ϲϬϵ ϭ͘ϱ ^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞ Ϯϰ Ϯϰ ϰϴ Ψϭϯ͕ϴϱϴ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϯ͕ϴϱϴ ϭ͘ϲ ZŝƐŬƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ ϭϲ ϰϬ ϱϲ Ψϭϰ͕ϳϰϭ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϰ͕ϳϰϭ Kd,
Z/Z
dK^d^ Ψϯϲϯ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϯϲϯ ^ƵďƚŽƚĂůWŚĂƐĞϭ ϯϯϮ ϭϬϴ ϲ Ϯϴϰ Ϭ Ϭ ϭϰϰ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϴ ϮϮ ϲ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϳϮ ϭϬϰ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϭϬϴϲ ΨϮϲϵ͕ϳϳϱ Ψϰ͕ϴϳϴ Ψϭϲ͕ϯϮϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ Ψϯ͕ϵϰϬ Ψϲ͕ϵϯϮ ΨϬ ΨϭϬ͕ϳϵϳ ΨϭϬ͕ϵϭϮ ΨϯϮϯ͕ϱϱϰ Ϯ͘Ϭ ĂƚĂŽůůĞĐƚŝŽŶϮ͘ϭ ZĞĐŽƌĚƐZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ ϴ ϰϬ ϰϬ ϰϬ ϭϮϴ Ψϭϴ͕ϭϯϴ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϭϱ͕ϯϯϴ Ψϯϯ͕ϰϳϲ Ϯ͘Ϯ ZŝŐŚƚŽĨtĂǇDĂƉƉŝŶŐ;>ĂŶĚŶĞƚͿ ϴ ϮϬ ϴϬ ϮϰϬ ϰ ϰϬ ϲϰ ϰ ϰϲϬ Ψϴϳ͕ϱϱϯ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϴϳ͕ϱϱϯ Ϯ͘ϯ /ŶŝƚŝĂůhƚŝůŝƚǇŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ ϴ ϯϮ ϲϬ ϭϬϬ ϮϬϬ ΨϯϮ͕ϵϭϯ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϯϮ͕ϵϭϯ Ϯ͘ϰ ^ƵďƐƵƌĨĂĐĞhƚŝůŝƚǇ/ŶǀĞƐƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƐ ϮϬ ϰϬ ϲϬ Ψϭϰ͕ϲϬϱ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϰ͕ϲϬϱ Kd,
Z/Z
dK^d^ ΨϲϮ͕ϭϳϱ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϲϮ͕ϭϳϱ ^ƵďƚŽƚĂůWŚĂƐĞϮ ϴ ϯϮ Ϭ ϴ Ϭ Ϭ ϭϬϬ ϰϬ ϭϰϬ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϴ ϮϬ ϴϬ ϮϰϬ ϰ ϰϬ ϮϬ ϰϬ ϲϰ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϰ ϴϰϴ ΨϮϭϱ͕ϯϴϰ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ Ψϭϱ͕ϯϯϴ ΨϮϯϬ͕ϳϮϮ ϯ͘Ϭ ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶϯ͘ϭ ŝƚǇĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ;KƵƚƐŝĚĞWƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐͿ ϭϲ ϰϬ ϰϬ Ϯϰ ϭϮϬ ΨϮϯ͕ϵϱϳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮϯ͕ϵϱϳ ϯ͘Ϯ ^ZZ ϰϬ ϴϬ ϴϬ ϴϬ ϮϴϬ Ψϱϰ͕ϮϯϮ Ͳ ϭϲ͕ϮϵϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϳϮ͕ϳϰϰ Ψϭϰϯ͕Ϯϲϲϯ͘ϯ Wh Ϯϰ Ϯϰ ϰϬ ϰ ϵϮ ΨϮϬ͕ϴϲϲ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϭϰ͕ϰϬϬ Ψϯϱ͕Ϯϲϲ ϯ͘ϰ ĂůƚƌĂŶƐ Ϯϰ ϰϬ ϰϬ ϰϬ ϭϰϰ ΨϮϴ͕ϱϬϵ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮϴ͕ϱϬϵ ϯ͘ϱ Kd Ϯϰ ϰϬ Ϯϰ Ϯϰ ϭϭϮ ΨϮϰ͕ϭϭϲ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮϰ͕ϭϭϲ ϯ͘ϲ KƚŚĞƌdŚŝƌĚWĂƌƚŝĞƐ ϰ ϰ ϴ Ϯϰ ϰϬ Ψϲ͕ϮϳϮ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϲ͕ϮϳϮ ϯ͘ϳ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇ
ŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ Ϯϰ Ϯϰ ϰϬ ϲϬ ϭϲ ϭϲ ϭϴϬ ΨϯϮ͕ϭϮϬ ϭϲϳ͕ϰϲϭ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϵϵ͕ϱϴϮ ϯ͘ϴ ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚŝŶŐ'ƌĂƉŚŝĐƐ Ϯϰ Ϯϰ ϭϮ ϲϬ ϰϬ ϯϲϬ ϭϮϬ ϲϰϬ Ψϴϴ͕Ϯϲϲ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϴϴ͕Ϯϲϲ Kd,
Z/Z
dK^d^ ΨϬ Ϯϲ͕ϯϬϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮϲ͕ϯϬϬ ^ƵďƚŽƚĂůWŚĂƐĞϯ ϭϱϲ Ϭ Ϭ Ϯϳϲ Ϭ Ϭ ϮϳϮ Ϭ ϮϴϬ Ϭ Ϭ Ϯϴ ϳϲ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϰϬ ϯϲϬ ϭϮϬ Ϭ ϭϲϬϴ ΨϮϳϴ͕ϯϰϬ Ψϭϵϯ͕ϳϲϭ Ψϭϲ͕ϮϵϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ Ψϴϳ͕ϭϰϰ Ψϱϳϱ͕ϱϯϱ ϰ͘Ϭ ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐϰ͘ϭ ĞƐŝŐŶ
ǆĐĞƉƚŝŽŶƐͲŝƚǇĞƐŝŐŶDĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵ ϴ Ϯϰ ϰϬ ϰϬ ϭϭϮ Ψϭϵ͕ϮϳϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϵ͕ϮϳϬ ϰ͘Ϯ ĞƐŝŐŶ
ǆĐĞƉƚŝŽŶƐͲ^ZZ ϴ ϮϬ ϮϬ ϰϴ ΨϭϬ͕ϲϱϰ Ͳ Ϯϯ͕ϲϬϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϰϬ͕ϲϳϮ Ψϳϰ͕ϵϮϲ ϰ͘ϯ ĞƐŝŐŶ
ǆĐĞƉƚŝŽŶƐͲĂůƚƌĂŶƐ;KWd/KE>Ϳ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϬ ^ƵďƚŽƚĂůWŚĂƐĞϰ ϭϲ Ϭ Ϭ ϰϰ Ϭ Ϭ ϲϬ Ϭ ϰϬ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϭϲϬ ΨϮϵ͕ϵϮϰ ΨϬ ΨϮϯ͕ϲϬϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϰϬ͕ϲϳϮ Ψϵϰ͕ϭϵϲ ϱ͘Ϭ ^ŝƚĞ^ƵƌǀĞǇϱ͘ϭ WƌŽũĞĐƚŽŶƚƌŽů Ϯ ϰ ϭϲ ϭϲ ϴ ϯϮ ϳϴ ΨϮϭ͕Ϭϳϲ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮϭ͕Ϭϳϲ ϱ͘Ϯ ĞƌŝĂůdŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚǇ Ϯ Ϯ ϰ ϴ ϰ ϭϲ ϯϲ ΨϭϬ͕Ϭϱϰ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϭϬ͕Ϭϱϰ ϱ͘ϯ &ŝĞůĚ^ƵƌǀĞǇ ϭϬ ϮϬ ϰϬ ϴϬ ϴ ϭϰϰ ϯϬϮ Ψϴϱ͕ϲϯϰ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϴϱ͕ϲϯϰ Kd,
Z/Z
dK^d^ ΨϭϮ͕ϳϮϴ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϭϮ͕ϳϮϴ ^ƵďƚŽƚĂůWŚĂƐĞϱ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϭϰ Ϯϲ ϲϬ ϭϬϰ ϮϬ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϭϵϮ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϰϭϲ ΨϭϮϵ͕ϰϵϭ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϭϮϵ͕ϰϵϭ ϲ͘Ϭ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůZĞǀĂůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶϲ͘ϭ
Y Ϯ ϰ ϲ Ψϭ͕ϲϭϯ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϳ͕ϴϮϳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϵ͕ϰϰϬ ϲ͘Ϯ E
W ϭϲ ϮϬ ϰϬ ϰϬ ϭϭϲ ΨϮϮ͕Ϭϰϰ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϭϰϲ͕ϯϭϳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϲϴ͕ϯϲϭ ϲ͘ϯ dĞĐŚŶŝĐĂů^ƚƵĚŝĞƐϲ͘ϯ͘ϭ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϯϯ͕ϮϬϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϯϯ͕ϮϬϬ ϲ͘ϯ͘Ϯ WŚĂƐĞ/
^ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ϯϭ͕ϱϭϵ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮϭ͕ϱϭϵ ϲ͘ϯ͘ϯ ŝƌYƵĂůŝƚǇ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϰϱ͕Ϭϴϱ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϰϱ͕Ϭϴϱ ϲ͘ϯ͘ϰ ^ƵƉƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂůEŽŝƐĞZĞƉŽƌƚ ϬΨϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϵϬ͕ϳϴϳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϵϬ͕ϳϴϳ ϲ͘ϯ͘ϱ EŽŝƐĞďĂƚĞŵĞŶƚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶZĞƉŽƌƚ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ϯϵ͕ϬϮϱ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮϵ͕ϬϮϱ ϲ͘ϯ͘ϲ hƉĚĂƚĞĚĂůƚƌĂŶƐĂƚĂ^ŚĞĞƚƐ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϭϱ͕ϮϭϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϱ͕ϮϭϬ ϲ͘ϯ͘ϳ ZĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ/ŵƉĂĐƚDĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϭϳ͕ϰϭϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϳ͕ϰϭϬ Kd,
Z/Z
dK^d^ ΨϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ϯ͕ϱϬϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮ͕ϱϬϬ ^ƵďƚŽƚĂůWŚĂƐĞϲ ϭϴ Ϭ Ϭ Ϯϰ Ϭ Ϭ ϰϬ ϰϬ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϭϮϮ ΨϮϯ͕ϲϱϳ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϭ͕ϱϭϵ ΨϬ Ψϯϱ͕ϳϬϬ Ψϯϭϵ͕ϬϰϬ ΨϯϮ͕ϲϮϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϰϯϮ͕ϱϯϳ ϳ ZŽĂĚǁĂǇͬŝǀŝů/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐϳ͘ϭ ŽŶĐĞƉƚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ϮϬ ϰϬ ϲϬ ϲϬ ϰϬ ϮϮϬ Ψϯϴ͕ϯϴϮ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϯϴ͕ϯϴϮ ϳ͘Ϯ ZŽĂĚǁĂǇϳ͘Ϯ͘ϭ ZŽĂĚǁĂǇWůĂŶƐ;ϱϰͿ ϱϱ ϭϮϲ ϲϲ ϰϭϰ ϵϱϲ ϭϮϰϱ ϮϴϲϮ ΨϰϬϬ͕ϬϮϴ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϰϬϬ͕ϬϮϴ ϳ͘Ϯ͘Ϯ ,ΘsŽŶƚƌŽůWůĂŶƐ;ϮͿ Ϯ ϰ ϭϲ ϰϬ ϰ ϲϲ Ψϭϭ͕Ϭϰϱ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϭ͕Ϭϰϱ ϳ͘Ϯ͘ϯ ^Θ^ͬ^ƚĂŐŝŶŐͬdƌĂĨĨŝĐ,ĂŶĚůŝŶŐͬĞƚŽƵƌ;ϭϴͿ ϵϴ ϮϴϮ ϮϲϮ ϲϰϮ Ψϴϳ͕ϳϵϲ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϴϳ͕ϳϵϲ ϳ͘Ϯ͘ϰ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ^ŝŐŶĂůĂŶĚ/ŶƚĞƌĐŽŶŶĞĐƚ;ϯͿ ϴ ϳϬ ϭϮϬ ϭϬϬ Ϯϵϴ Ψϰϰ͕ϯϲϱ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϰϰ͕ϯϲϱ ϳ͘Ϯ͘ϱ ^ƚƌĞĞƚ>ŝŐŚƚŝŶŐ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϰϲ͕ϮϴϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϰϲ͕ϮϴϬ ϳ͘Ϯ͘ϲ hƚŝůŝƚǇ^ŚĞĞƚƐ;ϳͿ ϱ ϭϬ ϱ ϰϴ ϵϮ ϭϰϮ ϯϬϮ Ψϰϭ͕ϯϭϰ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϰϭ͕ϯϭϰ ϳ͘Ϯ͘ϳ tĂƚĞƌDĂŝŶZĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϭϬϵ͕ϳϵϵ Ͳ ΨϭϬϵ͕ϳϵϵ ϳ͘Ϯ͘ϴ ^ĞǁĞƌDĂŝŶZĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ;ϱͿ ϱ ϭϬ ϲ ϯϯ ϴϰ ϭϬϰ ϮϰϮ Ψϯϯ͕ϴϮϮ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϯϯ͕ϴϮϮ ϳ͘ϯ ƌĂŝŶĂŐĞϳ͘ϯ͘ϭ ,Θ,ZĞƉŽƌƚ ϰ ϯϲ ϰϬ ϮϬϬ ϮϰϬ ϱϮϬ ΨϴϬ͕Ϯϴϰ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϴϬ͕Ϯϴϰ ϳ͘ϯ͘Ϯ WƵŵƉ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶΘZĞƚĞŶƚŝŽŶWůĂŶƐ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϱϰϬ͕ϲϱϰ Ͳ ΨϱϰϬ͕ϲϱϰ ϳ͘ϯ͘ϯ ^ƚŽƌŵƌĂŝŶWůĂŶƐ;ϳͿ ϰ Ϯϰ ϰϴ ϲϬ ϭϮϬ ϭϲϬ ϰϭϲ ΨϲϮ͕ϭϵϮ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϮϬ͕ϰϮϭ Ͳ ΨϴϮ͕ϲϭϮ ϳ͘ϰ tĂƚĞƌYƵĂůŝƚǇϳ͘ϰ͘ϭ tYDW ϭϮ ϰϬ ϲϬ ϭϬϬ ϮϭϮ Ψϯϯ͕ϱϮϰ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϯϯ͕ϱϮϰ ϳ͘ϰ͘Ϯ WůĂŶWƌĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶ;ϮͿ Ϯ ϭϮ Ϯϰ ϯϮ ϰϬ ϭϭϬ Ψϭϲ͕ϬϲϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϲ͕ϬϲϬ ϳ͘ϱ WůĂŶƚŝŶŐΘ/ƌƌŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ ϭϲ ϲϬ ϯϲϬ ϳϮϬ ϭϭϱϲ Ψϭϭϴ͕ϲϱϰ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϭϴ͕ϲϱϰ ϳ͘ϲ ^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ ϱ ϴ ϴ ϮϰϬ Ϯϰ Ϯϴϱ Ψϰϵ͕ϵϳϮ Ͳ Ϯϯ͕ϴϯϬ ϰ͕ϰϵϯ ϯ͕ϯϭϲ ϭϵ͕ϱϰϬ Ͳ Ͳ ϯϲ͕ϭϮϱ ϭϳ͕ϵϳϰ Ψϭϱϱ͕Ϯϱϭ ϳ͘ϳ YƵĂŶƚŝƚŝĞƐΘ
ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞ ϱ ϴ ϰϬ ϭϬϬ ϭϴϬ ϮϰϬ ϱϳϯ Ψϳϵ͕ϴϳϰ Ϯϴ͕ϯϭϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϭϬϴ͕ϭϴϰ ϳ͘ϴ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞ ϰ ϭϲ ϰϬ Ϯϰ ϴϰ Ψϭϴ͕ϳϭϱ Ͳ ϱ͕ϵϮϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϭϲ͕ϬϳϮ ΨϰϬ͕ϳϬϳ ^ƵďƚŽƚĂůWŚĂƐĞϳ ϭϬϵ ϰϴ ϮϭϬ ϯϰϱ ϭϲϴ Ϭ ϭϮϲϯ ϭϵϮϲ Ϯϲϳϯ Ϭ ϭϲ ϴϰ ϯϲϬ ϳϮϬ Ϯ ϰ ϭϲ ϰϬ ϰ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϳϵϴϴ Ψϭ͕ϭϭϲ͕ϬϮϳ ΨϬ Ψϱϴ͕ϬϲϬ Ψϰ͕ϰϵϯ Ψϯ͕ϯϭϲ Ψϲϱ͕ϴϮϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϳϬϲ͕ϵϵϵ Ψϯϰ͕Ϭϰϲ Ψϭ͕ϵϴϴ͕ϳϲϭ ϴ ZĂŝůƌŽĂĚΘ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůĞƐŝŐŶϴ͘ϭ dƌĂĐŬWůĂŶƐ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϲϳ͕ϭϱϬ Ψϲϳ͕ϭϱϬ ϴ͘Ϯ ZĂŝůƌŝĚŐĞϴ͘Ϯ͘ϭ dǇƉĞ^ĞůĞĐƚŝŽŶ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ ϰϱ͕ϮϬϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϰϱ͕ϮϬϬ ϴ͘Ϯ͘Ϯ WůĂŶWƌĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ ϰϱϵ͕ϰϬϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϰϱϵ͕ϰϬϬ ϴ͘Ϯ͘ϯ /ŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚŚĞĐŬ ϴϬ ϮϱϬ ϯϭϮ ϲϰϮ ΨϭϮϴ͕ϴϬϱ Ͳ ϭϳ͕ϱϳϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϰϲ͕ϯϳϱ ϴ͘ϯ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƌŝĚŐĞϴ͘ϯ͘ϭ dǇƉĞ^ĞůĞĐƚŝŽŶ Ϯϰ ϱϰ ϲϬ ϱϰ ϲϬ ϮϱϮ Ψϰϱ͕ϳϱϮ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϰϱ͕ϳϱϮ ϴ͘ϯ͘Ϯ WůĂŶWƌĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶ ϱϬ ϭϮϬ ϭϲϬ ϭϬϬ ϮϮϬ ϲϱϬ Ψϭϭϲ͕ϴϵϵ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϭϲ͕ϴϵϵ ϴ͘ϯ͘ϯ /ŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚŚĞĐŬ ϯϮ ϲϴ ϴϬ ϲϴ Ϯϰϴ Ψϰϲ͕Ϯϯϵ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϰϲ͕Ϯϯϵ ϴ͘ϰ ZĞƚĂŝŶŝŶŐtĂůůƐϴ͘ϰ͘ϭ WůĂŶWƌĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶ ϭϮϬ ϮϰϬ ϯϬϬ ϮϰϬ ϯϴϬ ϭϮϴϬ ΨϮϯϭ͕ϱϵϭ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮϯϭ͕ϱϵϭ ϴ͘ϰ͘Ϯ /ŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚŚĞĐŬ;ŶŽŶͲƐƚĚǁĂůůƐͿ ϴϬ ϭϬϬ ϭϮϬ ϭϬϬ ϰϬϬ Ψϳϳ͕ϴϵϱ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϳϳ͕ϴϵϱ dKd>K^d
K^dWZKWK^>&KZWZK:
d^KW
Ͳ^ĂŶƚĂŶĂ͗^ĂŶƚĂŶĂůǀĚ'ƌĂĚĞ^ĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶ
dŽƚĂůDd
ŽƐƚ
DĂƌŬdŚŽŵĂƐ
dŽƚĂů
,ŽƵƌƐ
^ƵďĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂŶƚƐ
ΎWůĞĂƐĞŶŽƚĞƚŚĂƚƌĂƚĞƐƐŚŽǁŶĂƌĞĨŽƌĞƐƚŝŵĂƚŝŶŐƉƵƌƉŽƐĞŽŶůǇ͘^ĞĞZĂƚĞ^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞĨŽƌĂĐƚƵĂůƌĂƚĞƐͬƌĂŶŐĞƐ͘ 3OHDVHQRWHWKDWWKHUDWHVVKRZQDUHIRUHVWLPDWLQJSXUSRVHVRQO\6HHUDWHVFKHGXOHIRUDFWXDOUDWHVUDQJHV 07)HH
&RVW(VWLPDWH5DWHV
5(9,6,21

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3225 5/5/2026

Zd,D
,E/
&
,ZΘW

Z^
/&
DKEhD
EdZKt
d
dZd
,

W,zZZ/>
Ψϯϰϴ ΨϮϴϵ ΨϮϲϯ ΨϮϮϵ ΨϮϭϴ Ψϭϵϴ Ψϭϲϰ Ψϭϯϯ ΨϭϭϬ Ψϭϲϳ ΨϮϴϯ ΨϮϬϰ Ψϭϭϯ Ψϴϱ Ψϯϱϰ ΨϮϱϴ ΨϮϬϵ Ψϭϯϯ Ψϭϱϵ Ψϭϭϲ ΨϮϲϬ ΨϮϯϱ Ψϯϵϯ Ψϭϯϯ Ψϭϰϳ ΨϭϵϮ Ψϭϯϵ ΨϭϭϬ ΨϭϬϴ Wt dKd>K^d
K^dWZKWK^>&KZWZK:
d^KW
Ͳ^ĂŶƚĂŶĂ͗^ĂŶƚĂŶĂůǀĚ'ƌĂĚĞ^ĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶ
dŽƚĂůDd
ŽƐƚ
DĂƌŬdŚŽŵĂƐ
dŽƚĂů
,ŽƵƌƐ
^ƵďĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂŶƚƐ
ΎWůĞĂƐĞŶŽƚĞƚŚĂƚƌĂƚĞƐƐŚŽǁŶĂƌĞĨŽƌĞƐƚŝŵĂƚŝŶŐƉƵƌƉŽƐĞŽŶůǇ͘^ĞĞZĂƚĞ^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞĨŽƌĂĐƚƵĂůƌĂƚĞƐͬƌĂŶŐĞƐ͘ ϴ͘ϱ ĂŶŽƉǇZĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶͬZĞĨĂĐŝŶŐ Ϯϰ ϴϬ ϳϮ ϰϬ ϲϬ Ϯϳϲ Ψϱϭ͕ϱϮϲ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϱϭ͕ϱϮϲ ϴ͘ϲ ĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐ Ϯ ϯϲ ϭϲϬ ϯϬϬ ϰϵϴ Ψϱϭ͕ϰϵϮ Ͳ ϲ͕ϭϰϬ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϱϳ͕ϲϯϮ ϴ͘ϳ 'ĞŽƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂů/ŶǀĞƐƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶΘZĞƉŽƌƚ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ ͲͲ ϰϲϯ͕ϴϴϴ Ͳ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϰϲϯ͕ϴϴϴ ^ƵďƚŽƚĂůWŚĂƐĞϴ Ϭ ϰϭϬ Ϭ Ϭ ϵϭϮ Ϭ ϭϭϬϰ ϲϬϮ Ϭ ϳϮϬ Ϯ ϯϲ ϭϲϬ ϯϬϬ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϬϬϬϬ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϬϬ ϰϮϰϲ ΨϳϱϬ͕ϮϬϬ ΨϬ ΨϱϮϴ͕ϯϭϬ ΨϬ Ψϰϲϯ͕ϴϴϴ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ Ψϲϳ͕ϭϱϬ Ψϭ͕ϴϬϵ͕ϱϰϴ ϭϬ͘Ϭ hƚŝůŝƚǇŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶϭϬ͘ϭ KŶŐŽŝŶŐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ ϭϮ ϭϮ ϯϲ ϴϬ ϮϰϬ ϯϴϬ Ψϱϱ͕ϱϮϯ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϱϱ͕ϱϮϯ ϭϬ͘Ϯ hƚŝůŝƚǇEŽƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ ϴ ϭϮ ϰϬ ϴϬ ϭϲϬ ϯϬϬ Ψϰϲ͕Ϯϭϲ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϰϲ͕Ϯϭϲ ϭϬ͘ϯ hƚŝůŝƚǇŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚͲKWd/KE> Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϬ ^ƵďƚŽƚĂůWŚĂƐĞϭϬ ϮϬ Ϯϰ Ϭ ϳϲ Ϭ Ϭ ϭϲϬ Ϭ ϰϬϬ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϲϴϬ ΨϭϬϭ͕ϳϯϵ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϭϬϭ͕ϳϯϵ ϭϭ͘Ϭ dƌĂĨĨŝĐDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚWůĂŶϭϭ͘ϭ dDWWƌĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶ ϰ ϴ ϴ ϮϬ Ψϰ͕ϴϭϮ Ͳ ͲͲ Ͳ ϯϴ͕ϭϯϱ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϰϮ͕ϵϰϳ ^ƵďƚŽƚĂůWŚĂƐĞϭϭ ϰ Ϭ Ϭ ϴ Ϭ ϴ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϮϬ Ψϰ͕ϴϭϮ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ Ψϯϴ͕ϭϯϱ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϰϮ͕ϵϰϳ ϭϮ͘Ϭ ŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚΘWĞƌŵŝƚƐϭϮ͘ϭ Wh'KͲϴϴ ϴ ϲϬ ϲϬ ϭϬϬ ϮϮϴ Ψϯϳ͕ϰϯϬ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ ϭϴ͕ϲϳϵ Ψϱϲ͕ϭϬϵ ϭϮ͘Ϯ ^ZZZŝŐŚƚŽĨ
ŶƚƌǇ ϴ ϮϬ ϮϬ ϰϴ ΨϭϬ͕ϲϱϰ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ ϰϭ͕ϭϭϰ Ψϱϭ͕ϳϲϴ ϭϮ͘ϯ ĂůƚƌĂŶƐ
ŶĐƌŽĂĐŚŵĞŶƚWĞƌŵŝƚ ϴ ϲϬ ϰϬ ϭϮϬ ϮϮϴ Ψϯϲ͕ϯϱϱ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϯϲ͕ϯϱϱ ϭϮ͘ϰ ΘDŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚ ϴ ϴ ϭϲ Ψϰ͕ϲϭϵ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ ϰϬ͕ϭϭϰ Ψϰϰ͕ϳϯϰ ^ƵďƚŽƚĂůWŚĂƐĞϭϮ ϯϮ Ϭ Ϭ ϭϰϴ Ϭ Ϭ ϭϮϬ Ϭ ϮϮϬ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϱϮϬ Ψϴϵ͕Ϭϱϵ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ Ψϵϵ͕ϵϬϳ Ψϭϴϴ͕ϵϲϲ dKd>,KhZ^ ϲϵϱ ϲϮϮ Ϯϭϲ ϭϮϭϯ ϭϬϴϬ ϴ ϯϮϲϯ ϮϲϬϴ ϯϳϱϯ ϳϮϬ Ϯϲ ϭϳϬ ϲϬϮ ϭϬϮϬ Ϯϰ ϱϬ ϭϱϲ ϯϴϰ Ϯϴ ϰϬ ϮϬ ϰϬ Ϯϱϲ ϳϮ ϭϬϰ ϰϬ ϯϲϬ ϭϮϬ ϰ ϭϳϲϵϰ ϭϳϵϮ ϰϭϴϯ ϭϭϲ ϭϳϭϲ ϴϳϰ ϭϳϱϲ ϯϬϭϴ ϰϲϭϱ ϭϴϯϵ ŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ^ĂůĂƌǇ/ŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƐ ΨϭϬϱ͕ϱϵϯ ΨϬ ΨϯϮ͕ϲϳϭ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ Ψϭϯϴ͕Ϯϲϰ Kd,
Z/Z
dK^d^ Ψϳϱ͕Ϯϲϱ ΨϮϲ͕ϯϬϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϭϬϭ͕ϱϲϱdKd>K^d ΨϮϰϭ͕ϵϲϱ Ψϭϳϵ͕ϱϳϴ Ψϱϲ͕ϴϱϵ ΨϮϳϴ͕ϭϬϱ ΨϮϯϱ͕ϯϴϰ Ψϭ͕ϱϴϱ Ψϱϯϱ͕ϲϴϯ Ψϯϰϲ͕ϵϱϭ Ψϰϭϰ͕Ϯϵϭ ΨϭϮϬ͕Ϯϯϵ Ψϳ͕ϯϱϵ Ψϯϰ͕ϲϰϱ Ψϲϴ͕ϭϱϴ Ψϴϲ͕ϲϭϯ Ψϴ͕ϰϵϭ ΨϭϮ͕ϴϳϵ ΨϯϮ͕ϲϳϱ Ψϱϭ͕Ϭϴϱ Ψϰ͕ϰϯϴ Ψϰ͕ϲϰϮ Ψϱ͕ϮϬϴ Ψϵ͕ϯϵϳ ΨϭϬϬ͕ϳϮϬ Ψϵ͕ϱϳϴ Ψϭϱ͕ϯϬϳ Ψϳ͕ϲϵϵ Ψϰϵ͕ϵϯϬ Ψϭϯ͕Ϯϰϳ ΨϰϯϬ Ψϯ͕ϭϭϰ͕ϬϬϭ Ψϭϵϴ͕ϲϯϵ Ψϲϳϱ͕Ϯϱϭ ΨϮϲ͕ϬϭϮ Ψϰϲϳ͕ϮϬϰ Ψϭϰϭ͕Ϭϵϱ ΨϯϮϱ͕ϵϳϯ ΨϯϮ͕ϲϮϬ Ψϳϭϳ͕ϳϵϲ Ψϯϱϱ͕ϭϳϬ Ψϲ͕Ϭϱϯ͕ϳϲϬ dĂƐŬƐƚŚĂƚŵĂǇďĞĨƵŶĚĞĚŽƵƚƐŝĚĞŽĨd/ZWŐƌĂŶƚ͗
ϵ ZŝŐŚƚŽĨtĂǇϵ͘ϭ ZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐDĂƉ ϰ ϭϲ ϮϬ ϰϬ ϴϬ ϭϲϬ ΨϮϮ͕ϰϵϳ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮϮ͕ϰϵϳ ϵ͘Ϯ >ĞŐĂůĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶƐΘWůĂƚƐ ϭϬ ϮϬ ϭϲϬ ϭϲϬ ϮϬ ϯϳϬ Ψϲϲ͕ϲϱϴ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϲϲ͕ϲϱϴ ϵ͘ϯ ƉƉƌĂŝƐĂůDĂƉƐ Ϯ ϰ ϴ ϰϬ Ϯ ϱϲ Ψϵ͕ϬϱϮ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϵ͕ϬϱϮ ϵ͘ϰ ƉƉƌĂŝƐĂůƐ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ ϮϱϮ͕ϴϬϬ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮϱϮ͕ϴϬϬ ϵ͘ϱ ĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ϯϵϴ͕ϴϲϬ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮϵϴ͕ϴϲϬ ϵ͘ϲ WƌŽƉĞƌƚǇDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ ϰϬ͕ϬϳϬ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϰϬ͕ϬϳϬ ϵ͘ϳ ƵƐŝŶĞƐƐ'ŽŽĚǁŝůůƉƉƌĂŝƐĂůƐ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ ϲϬ͕ϬϬϬ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϲϬ͕ϬϬϬ ϵ͘ϴ ƵƐŝŶĞƐƐZĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ ϵϱ͕ϵϴϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϵϱ͕ϵϴϬ ϵ͘ϵ &&
ƉƉƌĂŝƐĂůƐ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ ϰϱ͕ϱϬϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϰϱ͕ϱϬϬ ϵ͘ϭ dĞŶĂŶƚĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶƐ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ ϯϳ͕ϴϱϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϯϳ͕ϴϱϬ ϵ͘ϭϭ ĞƌƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ ϭϰ͕ϵϴϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϰ͕ϵϴϬ Kd,
Z/Z
dK^d^ ΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ ^ƵďƚŽƚĂůWŚĂƐĞϵ ϰ Ϭ Ϭ ϭϲ Ϭ Ϭ ϮϬ ϰϬ ϴϬ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϭϮ Ϯϰ ϭϲϴ ϮϬϬ ϮϮ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϱϴϲ Ψϭϭϴ͕ϮϬϳ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ Ψϴϰϲ͕ϬϰϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ Ψϵϲϰ͕Ϯϰϳ ϭϯ ŝĚΘŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚϭϯ͘ϭ ŝĚ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚ ϰ ϭϮ ϴϬ ϴϬ ϭϬ ϭϬ ϭϵϲ Ψϯϭ͕ϬϵϬ Ͳ ϭϭ͕ϴϴϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ϯ͕ϱϭϱ Ͳ Ͳ ϭϬ͕ϭϰϱ ϴ͕ϭϰϲ Ψϲϯ͕ϳϳϳ ϭϯ͘Ϯ ŽŶĨŽƌŵĞĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ ϰ ϭϮ ϰϬ ϰϬ ϵϲ Ψϭϲ͕ϬϯϮ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϲ͕ϬϯϮϭϯ͘ϯ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚϭϯ͘ϯ͘ϭ DĞĞƚŝŶŐƐ ϭϮ ϴϬ ϭϮ ϴ ϭϮ ϭϮϰ ΨϮϳ͕ϰϳϴ Ͳ ϰ͕ϴϲϬ Ͳ Ͳ ϭ͕ϲϰϱ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ϭϬ͕ϵϭϮ Ψϰϰ͕ϴϵϱ ϭϯ͘ϯ͘Ϯ ZĞƐƉŽŶƐĞƚŽZ&/Ɛ ϭϬ ϭϮϬ ϮϬϬ ϴϬ ϴ ϰϭϴ Ψϳϲ͕ϭϬϭ Ͳ ϱϴ͕ϰϰϬ Ͳ Ͳ ϯ͕ϭϮϱ Ͳ Ͳ ϭϭϮ͕ϴϲϵ ϭϳ͕ϬϮϯ ΨϮϲϳ͕ϱϱϴ ϭϯ͘ϯ͘ϯ ZĞǀŝĞǁ^ŚŽƉƌĂǁŝŶŐƐΘ^ƵďŵŝƚƚĂůƐ ϭϬ ϭϮϬ ϰϬϬ ϲϬ ϭϲ ϲϬϲ ΨϭϬϳ͕ϵϬϰ Ͳ ϳϲ͕ϬϭϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ϯ͕ϯϴϱ Ͳ Ͳ ϭϰϵ͕ϰϴϳ Ϯϰ͕ϰϯϵ ΨϯϲϬ͕ϮϮϲ ϭϯ͘ϯ͘ϰ ZĞǀŝĞǁŽĨŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌŚĂŶŐĞZĞƋƵĞƐƚƐ ϮϬ ϰϬ ϰϬ ϭϬϬ ΨϮϮ͕ϳϬϭ Ͳ ϯ͕ϯϱϬ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮϲ͕Ϭϱϭ ϭϯ͘ϯ͘ϱ ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů
ǆŚŝďŝƚƐͬƌĂǁŝŶŐƐ ϮϬ ϰϬ ϰϬ ϭϬϬ Ψϭϱ͕ϱϲϴ Ͳ ϰ͕ϯϴϬ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϵ͕ϵϰϴ ϭϯ͘ϯ͘ϲ ƐͲƵŝůƚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ ϮϬ ϭϬϬ ϭϮϬ ϴ ϭϲ Ϯϲϰ Ψϯϳ͕ϲϵϭ Ͳ ϭϱ͕Ϯϲϱ Ͳ Ͳ ϭ͕Ϯϳϱ Ͳ Ͳ Ϯϭ͕ϰϱϮ ϭϳ͕ϭϲϱ ΨϵϮ͕ϴϰϴ ^ƵďƚŽƚĂůWŚĂƐĞϭϯ ϲϬ Ϭ Ϭ ϰϮϰ Ϭ Ϭ ϵϭϮ ϮϲϬ ϭϲϬ Ϭ Ϭ ϱϬ ϯϴ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϭϵϬϰ Ψϯϯϰ͕ϱϲϱ ΨϬ Ψϭϳϰ͕ϭϴϱ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϭϬ͕ϵϰϱ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϮϵϯ͕ϵϱϯ Ψϳϳ͕ϲϴϲ Ψϴϵϭ͕ϯϯϯ ϭϰ KƉƚŝŽŶĂů^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐϭϰ͘ϭ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ^ƚĂŬŝŶŐ;ƉĞƌǁĞĞŬĨĞĞͿ ϭ Ϯ ϱ ϭϬ ϱ ϰϬ ϲϯ Ψϭϵ͕ϳϳϳ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϭϵ͕ϳϳϳ ϭϰ͘Ϯ DŽŶƵŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶϭϰ͘Ϯ͘ϭ WƌĞͲŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶZĞĐŽƌĚŽĨ^ƵƌǀĞǇ ϱ ϭϬ ϴϬ ϭϲϬ ϭϲ ϰϬ ϰ ϯϭϱ Ψϰϵ͕ϵϵϱ ϱϰ͕Ϭϯϭ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϭϬϰ͕ϬϮϲ ϭϰ͘Ϯ͘Ϯ WŽƐƚͲŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶDŽŶƵŵĞŶƚZĞƐƚŽƌĂƚŝŽŶ ϱ ϭϬ ϰϬ ϴϬ ϭϲ ϰϬ ϰϬ ϰ Ϯϯϱ Ψϰϲ͕ϳϭϮ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϰϲ͕ϳϭϮ ϭϰ͘ϯ ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇ
ŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ ϭϮ ϭϮ ϭϮ ϰ ϰϬ Ψϵ͕ϯϮϵ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϵ͕ϯϮϵ ϭϰ͘ϰ ĂůƚƌĂŶƐĞƚŽƵƌƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ Ϭ ΨϬ Ͳ ͲͲ Ͳ ϰϬ͕Ϭϴϱ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϰϬ͕Ϭϴϱ ϭϰ͘ϱ hƚŝůŝƚǇŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚƐ ϴ ϭϮ ϰϬ ϰϬ ϴϬ ϭϴϬ ΨϯϬ͕ϴϭϴ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ϯϵ͕ϵϴϴ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϲϬ͕ϴϬϲϭϰ͘ϲ ĞƐŝŐŶ ǆĐĞƉƚŝŽŶƐͲĂůƚƌĂŶƐ ϴ ϮϬ ϮϬ ϰϬ ϲϬ ϭϰϴ ΨϮϮ͕ϱϵϵ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮϮ͕ϱϵϵ ϭϰ͘ϳ DĞƚƌŽůŝŶŬͲĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů^ƵƉƉŽƌƚ
ĨĨŽƌƚƐ Ϯϰ ϰϬ ϲϬ ϰϬ ϲϬ ϮϮϰ Ψϯϵ͕ϯϮϭ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ ϰϱ͕ϯϵϯ Ψϴϰ͕ϳϭϰ ϭϰ͘ϴ ĂůƚƌĂŶƐdƌĂĨĨŝĐ^ŝŐŶĂůDŽĚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ ϴ ϭϮ ϭϲ ϰϬ ϰϬ ϭϭϲ ΨϮϬ͕ϮϯϮ Ͳ ͲͲ ͲͲ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ ΨϮϬ͕ϮϯϮ Kd,
Z/Z
dK^d^ Ψϳ͕ϭϳϱ Ϯ͕ϰϬϬ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ͲͲ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ψϵ͕ϱϳϱ ^ƵďƚŽƚĂůWŚĂƐĞϭϰ ϱϮ ϭϮ ϴ ϭϮϰ ϭϲ Ϭ ϭϳϮ ϭϮϬ ϮϬϬ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϭϭ ϮϮ ϭϮϱ ϮϱϬ ϯϳ ϴϬ Ϭ Ϭ ϴϬ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ Ϭ ϭϮ ϭϯϮϭ ΨϮϰϱ͕ϵϱϴ Ψϱϲ͕ϰϯϭ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϬ ΨϰϬ͕Ϭϴϱ ΨϬ ΨϮϵ͕ϵϴϴ ΨϬ Ψϰϱ͕ϯϵϯ Ψϰϭϳ͕ϴϱϱ 3OHDVHQRWHWKDWWKHUDWHVVKRZQDUHIRUHVWLPDWLQJSXUSRVHVRQO\6HHUDWHVFKHGXOHIRUDFWXDOUDWHVUDQJHV 07)HH
&RVW(VWLPDWH5DWHV
5(9,6,21

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3226 5/5/2026
Engineering & Planning District Management Surveying
Intern $65 * Inspector - Apprentice $96 Survey Division Manager $354 Technician $108 * Inspector $113 Survey Manager II $258 Design Engineer I $110 * Sr. Inspector $156 Survey Manager I $221 Design Engineer II $133 Assistant Sanitary Engineer $178 Project Surveyor III $209 Sr. Technician $167 Associate Sanitary Engineer $187 Project Surveyor II $209 Civil Engineering Designer $175 Sanitary Project Engineer $209 Project Surveyor I $173 Project Engineer $164 Sr. Sanitary Project Engineer $246 Asst Surveyor III $161 Sr. Project Engineer $198 Operations Manager $263 Asst Surveyor II $133 Sr. Technical Engineer $192 Deputy District Manager $342 Asst Surveyor I $122 Project Manager $229 District Manager-Engineer $388 Survey Specialist III $195 Technical Lead $218 Survey Specialist II $159
Sr. Project Manager $289 Project Support/Coordination Survey Specialist I $130 Sr. Technical Lead $263 Project Assistant $93 Lead Survey Technician $133 Engineering Manager $348 Technical Writer $113 Survey Technician III $136 Design Manager $348 Sr. Project Assistant $127 Survey Technician II $116 Sr. Engineering Manager $391 Project Coordinator $127 Survey Technician I $74 Principal $555 Graphic Designer $110 SUE Program Manager $260 Sr. Technical Writer $127 * Chief of Party (OE12) $195
Construction Management Project Accountant $133 * Instrumentperson (OE12) $175 Office Engineer $156 Sr. Project Coordinator $147 * Chainperson (OE12) $170 * Asst. Resident Engineer $187 Sr. Graphic Designer $139 * Apprentice (OE12) $127 * Inspector - CM $173 Sr. Graphic Manager $192 * 2-Person Crew (OE12) $393 Resident Engineer $286 Project Accountant Manager $215 * 3-Person Crew (OE12) $560 Sr. Resident Engineer $331 * Utility Locator (South) $235 Division Manager - CM $436 Landscape Architecture/Urban Design Area Manager - CM $311 Landscape Intern $71 Planning
Landscape Designer I $85 Planner I $91
Grant Writing Landscape Designer II $113 Planner II $122 Funding Specialist $164 Landscape Architect $142 Sr. Planner $153 Sr. Funding Specialist $226 Sr. Landscape Architect $175 Funding Manager $331 LAUD Project Manager $204 Special Services Sr. LAUD Project Manager $263 Expert Witness $550
LAUD Division Manager $283 Strategic Consulting $550
MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC. RATE SCHEDULE
EXPIRES JUNE 30, 2025
Reimbursables including, but not limited to; reproductions, delivery and filing fees; outside consultant fees; and survey field expenses will be billed at Cost . Mileage will be billed per current IRS Rate .

This rate schedule expires June 30, 2026; rates are subject to escalation with new hourly rate schedule as of July 1, 2026. * These charge rates are subject to Prevailing Wage laws and Union contract.

RATE SCHEDULE (Special) | PAGE 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3227 5/5/2026

EXHIBIT C

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3228 5/5/2026

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and shall require any subcontractors to obtain and maintain insurance as described below for the entire Term of this Agreement against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with services, products and materials supplied to City. Total cost of such insurance shall be borne by Consultant.

MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE

1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence and $4,000,000 aggregate. Required policy limits can be met with primary and umbrella/excess insurance policies.

2. Automobile Liability (AL): Insurance Services Office Form CA 00 01 covering Code 1 (any auto), with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limits. In the event Consultant does not maintain commercial automobile liability insurance, City will accept evidence of personal automobile insurance, provided that such policy is endorsed for business use and provides coverage with a minimum limit of $1,000,000. Required policy limits can be met with primary and umbrella/excess insurance policies.

3. Workers’ Compensation (WC): as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident, policy or employee, for bodily injury or disease. Coverage is not required if Consultant has no employees and signs request to waive such insurance.

4. Professional Liability (PL) /Errors and Omissions(E&O): with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, and $2,000,000 aggregate.

If Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimum requirements for each line of coverage shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City.

Other Insurance Provisions
The above required insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

1. City, its City Council, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds, under Consultant’s CGL and AL policies, with respect to any liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, equipment, and personnel furnished in connection with such work or operations.

2. Consultant’s Insurance company(ies) agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its City Council, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers for losses EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3229 5/5/2026
paid under the terms of Consultant’s CGL, AL, and WC policies which arise from work performed by Consultant under this Agreement.

3. For any claims related to this contract, Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary and any insurance maintained by City, its City Council, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers shall not contribute with it.

4. A severability of interest provision must apply for all the additional insureds, ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability.

5. Insurance policies required herein shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, suspended, voided, reduced in coverage or in limits, non-renewed by the carrier, or materially changed except after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to City. Ten (10) days prior written notice shall be provided to City for policy cancellation or non-renewal due to non-payment of premium.

6. Certificate Holder on each Evidence of Insurance certificate shall be: City of Santa Ana, Attention: Keri Buck, 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-43, Santa Ana, CA 92701. The name and location of project must be included in the Description of Operations section of each certificate.

Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the State of California with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to City.

Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive Consultant’s obligation to provide them.

City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.

Special Risks or Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3230 5/5/2026

EXHIBIT D
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3231 5/5/2026
&,7<2)6$17$$1$
&HUWLILFDWLRQ,FHUWLI\WKDW,KDYHUHDGXQGHUVWDQGDQG DJUHHWRWKHWHUPVDQGFRQGLWLRQVRIWKLV5HTXHVW IRU3URSRVDOV,KDYHH[DPLQHGWKH6FRSHRI6HUYLFHV
([KLELW,
DQGDPTXDOLILHGWRSURYLGHVHUYLFHV
EHLQJ UHTXHVWHG DV VSHFLILHG KHUHLQ, XQGHUVWDQG DQG DJUHHWKDW, DP UHVSRQVLEOHIRU UHSRUWLQJ DQ\ HUURUVRPLVVLRQVRUGLVFUHSDQFLHVWRWKH&LW\IRUFODULILFDWLRQSULRUWRWKHVXEPLVVLRQRIP\SURSRVDO 352326(5¶667$7(0(17
, KDYH UHDG XQGHUVWRRG DQG DJUHHWRWKHWHUPV DQG FRQGLWLRQV RQ DOO SDJHVRIWKH5HTXHVWIRU3URSRVDOV8SRQUHTXHVW,ZLOOWUDQVIHUDQGGHOLYHUJRRGVRUVHUYLFHVWRWKH &LW\LQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKVDLGWHUPVDQGFRQGLWLRQV
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB /(*$/1$0(2)&203$1< 3+21($1')$;180%(56
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB %86,1(66$''5(66

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 35,17('1$0(2)$87+25,=('$*(17 7,7/(
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 6,*1$785(2)$87+25,=('$*(17 '$7( (0$,/$''5(66 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB )('(5$/,'180%(5
,)$33/,&$%/(
&2175$&725/,&(16(180%(5

,)$33/,&$%/(

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB &,7<2)6$17$$1$%86,1(66/,&(16(180%(5
(PLEASE PROVIDE IF AVAILABLE, BUT NOT REQUIRED UNTIL AND IF AN AWARD IS MADE TO PROPOSER.) 7+,6)2500867%(&203/(7('$1',1&/8'(':,7+7+(352326$/ 352326$/67+$7'2127&217$,17+,6)250:,//%(&216,'(5('1215(63216,9( $77$&+0(17$
352326(5¶6&(57,),&$7,21352326$/35,&,1*

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
City of Santa Ana

MARK THOMAS
ŷǻʒɦۯֽԼ
Ĥǻ͔˗ۯƛʞ̖˾ǻͧۯ֏ۯI̖˾͋ǻ̅ϤۯכÅ̅Ɋל
ŷۯנ֤ՆՀՆ֥ۯՀՄՄֽՆԻԻԻ
ۯנ֤ՀԻՅ֥ۯՀՁԿֽՁԿՆԻ
ԿԽԻԻۯ_ˠۯIǻ˾ʱ̖̅ۯƀɦǻˠۯכƍΑʱ͸ɦۯԽՆԻۯÅ͔ϒʱ̅ɦۯכIۯՆԽՃԻԽ
ŷǻ͸ۯƍ̖˾ɦ͔ϒʱˠˠɦ ̖ͧͧɊʱǻ͸ɦۯŷ͔ʱ̅Ɋʱ͋ǻˠۯװۯTʱϒʱͧʱ̖̅ۯĤǻ̅ǻʒɦ͔
Ċǻ̅Αǻ͔ϤۯԼՀۯכԽԻԽՃ ̖͋ͧ˾ɦ͔ϒʱˠˠɦ֣˾ǻ͔˗͸ʞ̖˾ǻͧלɊ̖˾
ՆՀֽԼՀՁԼՀՆԻ Ĭ֭
ԿՆՄՀՆԼ
35,17('1$0(2)$87+25,=('

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
6,*1$785( 2) $87+25,=(' $*(
Attachments EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3232 5/5/2026
&,7<2)6$17$$1$
3URSRVHU XQGHUVWDQGV DQG DJUHHVWKDWWKLVZULWWHQ5)3 RU DQ\ SDUWWKHUHRI VSHFLILFDOO\ GHVLJQDWHG DQG
DFFHSWHGE\WKH&LW\RI6DQWD$QDKHUHLQDIWHU&LW\
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
3URSRVHUIXUWKHUDJUHHVWKDWXSRQGHOLYHU\
DVGHILQHGDERYH
RIWKHDFFHSWHGDJUHHPHQWKHVKHZLOOIXUQLVK
&LW\ DOO UHTXLUHG ERQGV DQG FHUWLILFDWH RI OLDELOLW\ LQVXUDQFH ZLWKLQ WHQ
GD\V
H[FOXGLQJ 6DWXUGD\V
6XQGD\VDQG&LW\¶VOHJDOKROLGD\V
RUWKHIXQGVFKHFNGUDIWRUSURSRVHU¶VERQGVXEVWLWXWHGLQOLHXWKHUHRI DFFRPSDQ\LQJWKLVSURSRVDOVKDOOEHFRPHWKHSURSHUW\RIWKH&LW\DQGVKDOOEHFRQVLGHUHGDVSD\PHQWRI GDPDJHVGXHWRWKHGHOD\DQGRWKHUFDXVHVVXIIHUHGE\&LW\EHFDXVHRIWKHIDLOXUHWRIXUQLVKWKHQHFHVVDU\ ERQGVDQGEHFDXVHLWLVGLVWLQFWO\DJUHHGWKDWWKHSURRIRIGDPDJHVDFWXDOO\VXIIHUHGE\&LW\LVGLIILFXOWWR

DVFHUWDLQ
RWKHUZLVHVDLGIXQGVFKHFNGUDIWVRUSURSRVHU¶VERQGVXEVWLWXWHGLQOLHXWKHUHRIVKDOOEHUHWXUQHG WRWKHXQGHUVLJQHG
3URSRVHUXQGHUVWDQGVWKDWDSURSRVDOLVUHTXLUHGIRUWKHHQWLUHZRUNWKDWWKHHVWLPDWHGTXDQWLWLHVVHWIRUWK LQWKH5)3VFKHGXOHDUHVROHO\IRUWKHSXUSRVHRIFRPSDULQJSURSRVDOVDQGWKDWILQDOFRPSHQVDWLRQXQGHU WKHFRQWUDFWZLOOEHEDVHGXSRQWKHDFWXDOTXDQWLWLHVRIZRUNVDWLVIDFWRULO\FRPSOHWHG $OO WHUPV FRQWDLQHG LQ WKH VSHFLILFDWLRQV WKH FHUWLILFDWLRQ RI QRQGLVFULPLQDWLRQ E\ FRQWUDFWRUV DQG WKH UHTXLUHG LQVXUDQFH FHUWLILFDWHV DUH WR EH LQFRUSRUDWHG E\ UHIHUHQFH LQWR WKLV DJUHHPHQW DQG DUH PDGH VSHFLILFDOO\DVSDUWRIWKLV5)3
)LUPBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 6LJQHGDQG3ULQWHG1DPH
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 7LWOHBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 'DWH
7+,6)2500867%(&203/(7('$1',1&/8'(':,7+7+(352326$/ 352326$/67+$7'2127&217$,17+,6)250:,//%(&216,'(5('1215(63216,9( $77$&+0(17%
352326(5¶667$7(0(17

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
City of Santa Ana

MARK THOMAS
ŷǻʒɦۯֽԽ
Ĥǻ͔˗ۯƛʞ̖˾ǻͧۯ֏ۯI̖˾͋ǻ̅ϤۯכÅ̅Ɋל
ϒʱˠˠɦ͔ɦ˾̖ƍۯ͸ŷǻ ۯ ۯ ۯ ۯ ۯ ۯ ۯ ۯ ۯ
̖ͧͧɊʱǻ͸ɦۯŷ͔ʱ̅Ɋʱ͋ǻˠۯװۯTʱϒʱͧʱ̖̅ۯĤǻ̅ǻʒɦ͔
Ċǻ̅Αǻ͔ϤۯԼՀۯכԽԻԽՃ

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
)3
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB ̖˾͋ǻ̅Ϥ Å̅Ɋ
Tʱ ʱ ʱ Ĥ
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3233 5/5/2026

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
City of Santa Ana

MARK THOMAS
ŷǻʒɦۯֽԿ
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3234 5/5/2026
&,7<2)6$17$$1$
7KHSURVSHFWLYHSDUWLFLSDQWFHUWLILHVE\VLJQLQJDQGVXEPLWWLQJWKLVELGRUSURSRVDOWRWKHEHVWRIKLVRU KHUNQRZOHGJHDQGEHOLHIWKDW

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

,IDQ\IXQGVRWKHUWKDQ)HGHUDODSSURSULDWHGIXQGVKDYHEHHQSDLGRUZLOOEHSDLGWRDQ\SHUVRQ IRULQIOXHQFLQJRUDWWHPSWLQJWRLQIOXHQFHDQRIILFHURUHPSOR\HHRIDQ\)HGHUDODJHQF\D0HPEHU RI&RQJUHVVDQRIILFHURUHPSOR\HHRI&RQJUHVVRUDQHPSOR\HHRID0HPEHURI&RQJUHVVLQ FRQQHFWLRQ ZLWKWKLV )HGHUDO FRQWUDFW JUDQW ORDQ RU FRRSHUDWLYH DJUHHPHQWWKH XQGHUVLJQHG VKDOO FRPSOHWH DQG VXEPLW 6WDQGDUG )RUP/// 'LVFORVXUH RI /REE\LQJ $FWLYLWLHV LQ FRQIRUPDQFHZLWKLWVLQVWUXFWLRQV
7KLVFHUWLILFDWLRQLVDPDWHULDOUHSUHVHQWDWLRQRIIDFWXSRQZKLFKUHOLDQFHZDVSODFHGZKHQWKLVWUDQVDFWLRQ ZDVPDGHRUHQWHUHGLQWR6XEPLVVLRQRIWKLVFHUWLILFDWLRQLVDSUHUHTXLVLWHIRUPDNLQJRUHQWHULQJLQWR WKLVWUDQVDFWLRQLPSRVHGE\6HFWLRQ7LWOH86&RGH$Q\SHUVRQZKRIDLOVWRILOHWKHUHTXLUHG FHUWLILFDWLRQVKDOOEHVXEMHFWWRDFLYLOSHQDOW\RIQRWOHVVWKDQDQGQRWPRUHWKDQIRU HDFKVXFKIDLOXUH
7KH SURVSHFWLYH SDUWLFLSDQW DOVR DJUHHV E\ VXEPLWWLQJ KLV RU KHU ELG RU SURSRVDOWKDW KH RU VKH VKDOO UHTXLUHWKDWWKH ODQJXDJH RIWKLV FHUWLILFDWLRQ EH LQFOXGHG LQDOO ORZHUWLHU VXEFRQWUDFWV ZKLFK H[FHHG DQGWKDWDOOVXFKVXEUHFLSLHQWVVKDOOFHUWLI\DQGGLVFORVHDFFRUGLQJO\ 6LJQHG

7LWOH

)LUP

'DWH

7+,6)2500867%(&203/(7('$1',1&/8'(':,7+7+(352326$/ 352326$/67+$7'2127&217$,17+,6)250:,//%(&216,'(5('1215(63216,9( $77$&+0(17'
121/2%%<,1*&(57,),&$7,21

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
City of Santa Ana

MARK THOMAS
ŷǻʒɦۯֽՀ
̖ͧͧɊʱǻ͸ɦۯŷ͔ʱ̅Ɋʱ͋ǻˠۯװۯTʱϒʱͧʱ̖̅ۯĤǻ̅ǻʒɦ͔
Ĥǻ͔˗ۯƛʞ̖˾ǻͧۯ֏ۯI̖˾͋ǻ̅ϤۯכÅ̅Ɋל
Ċǻ̅Αǻ͔ϤۯԼՀۯכԽԻԽՃ
SDUWLFLSDQW DOVR DJUHHV E\ VXEPLWWL
DQJXDJH RI WKLV FHUWLILFDWLRQ EH LQF
DWDOOVXFK VXEUHFLSLHQWVVKDOOFHUWLI\
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3235 5/5/2026
&,7<2)6$17$$1$
7KH XQGHUVLJQHG FRQVXOWDQW RU FRUSRUDWH RIILFHU GXULQJWKH SHUIRUPDQFH RIWKLV FRQWUDFW FHUWLILHV DV

IROORZV

7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOQRWGLVFULPLQDWHDJDLQVWDQ\HPSOR\HHRUDSSOLFDQWIRUHPSOR\PHQWEHFDXVHRI UDFHFRORUUHOLJLRQVH[RUQDWLRQDORULJLQ7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOWDNHDIILUPDWLYHDFWLRQWRHQVXUHWKDW DSSOLFDQWVDUHHPSOR\HGDQGWKDWHPSOR\HHVDUHWUHDWHGGXULQJHPSOR\PHQWZLWKRXWUHJDUGWRWKHLU UDFH FRORU UHOLJLRQ VH[ RU QDWLRQDO RULJLQ 6XFK DFWLRQ VKDOO LQFOXGH EXW QRW EH OLPLWHG WR WKH

IROORZLQJ
HPSOR\PHQW XSJUDGLQJ GHPRWLRQ RU WUDQVIHU
UHFUXLWPHQW RU UHFUXLWPHQW DGYHUWLVLQJ

OD\RIIRUWHUPLQDWLRQ
UDWHVRISD\RURWKHUIRUPVRIFRPSHQVDWLRQ
DQGVHOHFWLRQIRUWUDLQLQJLQFOXGLQJ
DSSUHQWLFHVKLS7KH&RQVXOWDQWDJUHHVWRSRVWLQFRQVSLFXRXVSODFHVDYDLODEOHWRHPSOR\HHVDQG DSSOLFDQWVIRUHPSOR\PHQWQRWLFHVWREHSURYLGHGVHWWLQJIRUWKWKHSURYLVLRQVRIWKLVQRQGLVFULPLQDWLRQ FODXVH
7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOLQDOOVROLFLWDWLRQVRUDGYHUWLVHPHQWVIRUHPSOR\HHVSODFHGE\RURQEHKDOIRI WKH&RQVXOWDQWVWDWHWKDWDOOTXDOLILHGDSSOLFDQWVZLOO UHFHLYHFRQVLGHUDWLRQIRUHPSOR\PHQWZLWKRXW UHJDUGWRUDFHFRORUUHOLJLRQVH[RUQDWLRQDORULJLQ 7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOVHQGWRHDFKODERUXQLRQRUUHSUHVHQWDWLYHRIZRUNHUVZLWKZKLFKKHVKHKDVD FROOHFWLYHEDUJDLQLQJDJUHHPHQWRURWKHUFRQWUDFWRUXQGHUVWDQGLQJDQRWLFHWREHSURYLGHGDGYLVLQJ WKHVDLGODERUXQLRQRUZRUNHUV¶UHSUHVHQWDWLYHVRIWKH&RQVXOWDQW¶VFRPPLWPHQWVXQGHUWKLVVHFWLRQ DQGVKDOOSRVWFRSLHVRIWKHQRWLFHLQFRQVSLFXRXVSODFHVDYDLODEOHWRHPSOR\HHVDQGDSSOLFDQWVIRU HPSOR\PHQW
7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOFRPSO\ZLWKDOOSURYLVLRQVRI([HFXWLYH2UGHURI6HSWHPEHU
DQGRIWKHUXOHVUHJXODWLRQVDQGUHOHYDQWRUGHUVRIWKH6HFUHWDU\RI/DERU 7KH &RQVXOWDQW VKDOO IXUQLVK DOO LQIRUPDWLRQ DQG UHSRUWV UHTXLUHG E\ ([HFXWLYH 2UGHU RI 6HSWHPEHU
DQGE\ UXOHV UHJXODWLRQVDQGRUGHUVRIWKH6HFUHWDU\RI/DERURUSXUVXDQW WKHUHWRDQGZLOOSHUPLWDFFHVVWRKLVKHUERRNVUHFRUGVDQGDFFRXQWVE\WKHDGPLQLVWHULQJDJHQF\ DQGWKH6HFUHWDU\RI/DERUIRUSXUSRVHVRILQYHVWLJDWLRQWRDVFHUWDLQFRPSOLDQFHZLWKVXFK UXOHV UHJXODWLRQVDQGRUGHUV
,QWKHHYHQWRIWKH&RQVXOWDQW¶VQRQFRPSOLDQFHZLWKWKHQRQGLVFULPLQDWLRQFODXVHVRIWKLVFRQWUDFWRU ZLWK DQ\ RI WKH VDLG UXOHV UHJXODWLRQV RU RUGHUV WKH FRQWUDFW PD\ EH FDQFHOHG WHUPLQDWHG RU VXVSHQGHGLQZKROHRULQSDUWDQGWKH&RQVXOWDQWPD\EHGHFODUHGLQHOLJLEOHIRUIXUWKHU*RYHUQPHQW FRQWUDFWVRUIHGHUDOO\DVVLVWHG FRQVWUXFWLRQ FRQWUDFWVLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKSURFHGXUHVDXWKRUL]HGLQ ([HFXWLRQ 2UGHU RI 6HSWHPEHU
DQG VXFK RWKHU VDQFWLRQV PD\ EH LPSRVHG DQG UHPHGLHV LQYRNHG DV SURYLGHG LQ ([HFXWLYH 2UGHU RI 6HSWHPEHU RU E\ UXOH
UHJXODWLRQVRURUGHURIWKH6HFUHWDU\RI/DERURUDVRWKHUZLVHSURYLGHGE\ODZ 7KH&RQVXOWDQWVKDOOLQFOXGHWKHSRUWLRQRIWKHVHQWHQFHLPPHGLDWHO\SUHFHGLQJSDUDJUDSK
DQG
WKHSURYLVLRQVRISDUDJUDSKV

WKURXJK

LQHYHU\VXEFRQWUDFWRUSXUFKDVHRUGHUXQOHVVH[HPSWHG E\UXOHVUHJXODWLRQVRURUGHUVRIWKH6HFUHWDU\RI/DERULVVXHGSXUVXDQWWR6HFWLRQRI([HFXWLYH 2UGHURI6HSWHPEHU
VRWKDWVXFKSURYLVLRQVZLOOEHELQGLQJXSRQHDFKVXEFRQWUDFW $77$&+0(17(
121',6&5,0,1$7,21&(57,),&$7,21

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
City of Santa Ana

MARK THOMAS
ŷǻʒɦۯֽՁ
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3236 5/5/2026
&,7<2)6$17$$1$
RUSXUFKDVHRUGHUDVWKHDGPLQLVWHULQJDJHQF\PD\GLUHFWDVPHDQVRIHQIRUFLQJVXFKSURYLVLRQV LQFOXGLQJVDQFWLRQVIRUQRQFRPSOLDQFH
SURYLGHGKRZHYHUWKDWLQWKHHYHQWWKH&RQVXOWDQWEHFRPHV LQYROYHGLQRULVWKUHDWHQHGZLWKOLWLJDWLRQZLWKDVXEFRQVXOWDQWRUYHQGRUDVDUHVXOWRIVXFKGLUHFWLRQ E\ WKH DGPLQLVWHULQJ DJHQF\ WKH &RQVXOWDQW PD\ UHTXHVW WKDW WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV HQWHU LQWR VXFK OLWLJDWLRQWRSURWHFWWKHLQWHUHVWVRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV 3XUVXDQW WR &DOLIRUQLD /DERU &RGH 6HFWLRQ DV DGGHG E\ &KDSWHU 6WDWV
DQG DV
DPHQGHGQRGLVFULPLQDWLRQVKDOOEHPDGHLQWKHHPSOR\PHQWRISHUVRQVXSRQSXEOLFZRUNVEHFDXVH RIUDFHUHOLJLRXVFUHHGFRORUQDWLRQDORULJLQDQFHVWU\SK\VLFDOKDQGLFDSVPHQWDOFRQGLWLRQPDULWDO VWDWXV RU VH[ RI VXFK SHUVRQV H[FHSW DV SURYLGHG LQ6HFWLRQ DQG DQ\ FRQVXOWDQW RI SXEOLF ZRUNVYLRODWLQJWKLV6HFWLRQLVVXEMHFWWRDOOWKHSHQDOWLHVLPSRVHGIRUDYLRODWLRQRIWKH&KDSWHU 6LJQHG

7LWOH

)LUP

'DWH

7+,6)2500867%(&203/(7('$1',1&/8'(':,7+7+(352326$/ 352326$/67+$7'2127&217$,17+,6)250:,//%(&216,'(5('1215(63216,9(

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
City of Santa Ana

MARK THOMAS
ŷǻʒɦۯֽՃ
̖ͧͧɊʱǻ͸ɦۯŷ͔ʱ̅Ɋʱ͋ǻˠۯװۯTʱϒʱͧʱ̖̅ۯĤǻ̅ǻʒɦ͔
Ĥǻ͔˗ۯƛʞ̖˾ǻͧۯ֏ۯI̖˾͋ǻ̅ϤۯכÅ̅Ɋל
Ċǻ̅Αǻ͔ϤۯԼՀۯכԽԻԽՃ
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3237 5/5/2026
&,7<2)6$17$$1$
%LGGHUKHUHE\DFNQRZOHGJHVWKDWWKH\KDYHUHYLHZHGWKH&DOLIRUQLD$LU5HVRXUFHV%RDUG¶VSROLFLHVUXOHVDQG UHJXODWLRQVDQGDUHIDPLOLDUZLWKWKHUHTXLUHPHQWVRI7LWOH&DOLIRUQLD&RGHRI5HJXODWLRQV'LYLVLRQ&KDSWHU

HIIHFWLYHRQ-DQXDU\
WKH³5HJXODWLRQ´
%LGGHUKHUHE\FHUWLILHVVXEMHFWWRSHQDOW\IRUSHUMXU\WKDWWKH RSWLRQFKHFNHGEHORZUHODWLQJWRWKH%LGGHU¶VIOHHWDQGRUWKDWRIWKHLUVXEFRQWUDFWRU V

³)OHHW´
LVWUXHDQG

FRUUHFW

7KH )OHHW LV VXEMHFWWRWKH UHTXLUHPHQWV RIWKH 5HJXODWLRQ DQGWKH DSSURSULDWH &HUWLILFDWH V
RI 5HSRUWHG
&RPSOLDQFHKDYHEHHQDWWDFKHGKHUHWR
7KH)OHHWLVH[HPSWIURPWKH5HJXODWLRQXQGHUVHFWLRQ
I

DQGDVLJQHGGHVFULSWLRQRIWKHVXEMHFW
YHKLFOHVDQGUHDVRQLQJIRUH[HPSWLRQKDVEHHQDWWDFKHGKHUHWR %LGGHUDQGRUWKHLUVXEFRQWUDFWRULVXQDEOHWRSURFXUH5

RU5UHQHZDEOHGLHVHOIXHODVGHILQHGLQWKH
5HJXODWLRQSXUVXDQWWRVHFWLRQ

I

%LGGHUVKDOONHHSGHWDLOHGUHFRUGVGHVFULELQJWKHQRUPDOUHIXHOLQJ PHWKRGVWKHLUDWWHPSWVWRSURFXUHUHQHZDEOHGLHVHOIXHODQGSURRIWKDWVKRZVWKH\ZHUHQRWDEOHWRSURFXUH UHQHZDEOHGLHVHO
LHWKLUGSDUW\FRUUHVSRQGHQFHRUYHQGRUELGV

7KH )OHHW LV H[HPSW IURP WKH UHTXLUHPHQWV RI WKH 5HJXODWLRQ SXUVXDQW WR VHFWLRQ

EHFDXVH WKLV
3URMHFWKDVEHHQGHHPHGDQ(PHUJHQF\DVGHILQHGXQGHUVHFWLRQ

%LGGHUVKDOORQO\RSHUDWHWKH
H[HPSWHG YHKLFOHV LQWKH HPHUJHQF\ VLWXDWLRQ DQG UHFRUGV RIWKH H[HPSWHG YHKLFOHVPXVW EHPDLQWDLQHG SXUVXDQWWRVHFWLRQ

7KH)OHHWGRHVQRWIDOOXQGHUWKH5HJXODWLRQRUDUHRWKHUZLVHH[HPSWHGDQGDGHWDLOHGUHDVRQLQJLVDVIROORZV

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB %LGGHU¶V&RPSDQ\1DPH
SOHDVHSULQWRUW\SH

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 6LJQDWXUHRI%LGGHU
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 3ULQW1DPH
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 7LWOH
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
'2256,'
7+,6)2500867%(&203/(7('$1',1&/8'(':,7+7+(352326$/ 352326$/67+$7'2127&217$,17+,6)250:,//%(&216,'(5('1215(63216,9( $77$&+0(17)
&$5%)/((7&203/,$1&(&(57,),&$7,21

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
City of Santa Ana

MARK THOMAS
ŷǻʒɦۯֽՄ
Ĥǻ͔˗ۯƛʞ̖˾ǻͧۯ֏ۯI̖˾͋ǻ̅ϤۯכÅ̅Ɋ
ŷǻ͸ۯƍ̖˾ɦ͔ϒʱˠˠɦ
̖ͧͧɊʱǻ͸ɦۯŷ͔ʱ̅Ɋʱ͋ǻˠۯװۯTʱϒʱͧʱ̖̅ۯĤǻ̅ǻʒɦ͔

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
GHU¶V&RPSDQ\ 1DPH
SOHDVH SULQWRUW\

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
QDWXUHRI%LGGHU
Ĥǻ͔˗ۯƛʞ̖˾ǻͧۯ֏ۯI̖˾͋ǻ̅ϤۯכÅ̅Ɋ
N/AHLU
KH 5HJXODWLRQ DQGWKH
JXODWLRQXQGHUVHFWLRQ

I XODWLRQXQGHUVHFWLRQ

I

DQG
U H[HPSWLRQKDVEHHQ WLRQKDVEHHQ DWWDFKHGKHUHWR WWDFKHGKHUHWR XEFRQWUDFWRULVXQDEOHWRSURFXUH5

RU EFRQWUDFWRULVXQDEOHWRSURFXUH5

R 5UHQ
VHFWLRQ

I

%LGGHUVKDOONHHS GHWDLOH
WRSURFXUHUHQHZDEOHGLHVHOIXHODQG WRSURFXUHUHQHZDEOHGLHVHO SDUW\FRUUHVSRQGHQFHRUYHQG UW\FRUUHVSRQGHQFHRUY
KH UHTXLUHPHQWV RI TX
(PHUJHQF\D (PHUJ
JHQF\
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3238 5/5/2026
&,7<2)6$17$$1$
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
6LJQHG

7LWOH

)LUP

'DWH

7+,6)2500867%(&203/(7('$1',1&/8'(':,7+7+(352326$/ 352326$/67+$7'2127&217$,17+,6)250:,//%(&216,'(5('1215(63216,9( $77$&+0(17*
67$7(0(175(*$5',1*&20081,7<:25.)25&($*5((0(17
&:$

5(48,5(0(176

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
City of Santa Ana

MARK THOMAS
ŷǻʒɦۯֽՅ
̖ͧͧɊʱǻ͸ɦۯŷ͔ʱ̅Ɋʱ͋ǻˠۯװۯTʱϒʱͧʱ̖̅ۯĤǻ̅ǻʒɦ͔
Ĥǻ͔˗ۯƛʞ̖˾ǻͧۯ֏ۯI̖˾͋ǻ̅ϤۯכÅ̅Ɋל
Ċǻ̅Αǻ͔ϤۯԼՀۯכԽԻԽՃ
FKPHQW $ WRWKH&:$ GRFXPHQWV
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3239 5/5/2026
&,7<2)6$17$$1$
2Q$SULOWKHIHGHUDOJRYHUQPHQWVWRSSHGXVLQJWKH'8161XPEHUWRXQLTXHO\LGHQWLI\HQWLWLHV 1RZHQWLWLHVGRLQJEXVLQHVVZLWKWKHIHGHUDOJRYHUQPHQWXVHWKH8QLTXH(QWLW\,'FUHDWHGLQ6$0JRY 7KH\ QR ORQJHU KDYHWR JRWR DWKLUGSDUW\ZHEVLWHWR REWDLQWKHLU LGHQWLILHU7KLVWUDQVLWLRQ DOORZVWKH JRYHUQPHQW WR VWUHDPOLQH WKH HQWLW\ LGHQWLILFDWLRQ DQG YDOLGDWLRQ SURFHVV PDNLQJ LW HDVLHU DQG OHVV EXUGHQVRPHIRUHQWLWLHVWRGREXVLQHVVZLWKWKHIHGHUDOJRYHUQPHQW 7KLV5)3LQFOXGHVIHGHUDOIXQGLQJDQGDVVXFKWKHSURSRVHUPXVWSURYLGHYHULILFDWLRQRIWKHLU6$0JRY 8(, DQG UHJLVWUDWLRQ VWDWXV3OHDVH DWWDFK \RXU HQWLW\¶V UHJLVWUDWLRQIURP6$0JRY LQFOXGLQJ 8(, DQG DFWLYHUHJLVWUDWLRQVWDWXV
3URSRVHU¶V8(,
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
6$0JRY5HJLVWUDWLRQ([SLUDWLRQ'DWH

$77$&+0(17+
6$0*298(,9(5,),&$7,21

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
City of Santa Ana

MARK THOMAS
ŷǻʒɦۯֽՆ
&,7<2)6$17$$1$
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¶V UHJLVWUDWLRQIURP6$0JRY LQFOXGLQJ 8(, DQG DFWLYHUHJLVWUDWLRQVWDWXV 3URSRVHU¶V8(, BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 6$0JRY5HJLVWUDWLRQ([SLUDWLRQ'DWH
$77$&+0(17+ 6$0*298(,9(5,),&$7,21
ƛԿԽęՁ¡ŷǋՁĊԿ
ۯ ۯ ۯ Ĭ̖ϒɦ˾ɂɦ͔ۯԼԿۯכԽԻԽՃ
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3240 5/5/2026

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
City of Santa Ana

MARK THOMAS
ŷǻʒɦۯֽԼԻ
MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC.

Unique Entity ID
FT32L5HPW5J3

CAGE / NCAGE
338X3
Purpose of Registration
All Awards
Registration Status
Active Registration
Expiration Date
Nov 13, 2026
Physical Address
2833 Junction AVE
STE 110
San Jose, California 95134-1920
United States
Mailing Address
2833 Junction Avenue
Suite 110
San Jose, California 95134-2017
United States
Business Information
Doing Business as

MARK THOMAS & CO INC
Division Name
(blank)
Division Number
(blank)
Congressional District
California 17
State / Country of Incorporation
California / United States
URL
http://www.markthomas.com
Registration Dates
Activation Date
Nov 14, 2025
Submission Date
Nov 13, 2025
Initial Registration Date
Nov 30, 2004
Entity Dates
Entity Start Date
Jul 17, 1927
Fiscal Year End Close Date
Dec 31
Immediate Owner
CAGE
(blank)
Legal Business Name
(blank)
Highest Level Owner
CAGE
(blank)
Legal Business Name
(blank)
Executive Compensation
In your business or organization's preceding completed fiscal year, did your business or organization (the legal entity to which this specific SAM record, represented by a Unique Entity ID, belongs) receive both of the following: 1. 80 percent or more of your annual gross revenues in U.S. federal contracts, subcontracts, loans, grants, subgrants, and/or cooperative agreements and 2. $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from U.S. federal contracts, subcontracts, loans, grants, subgrants, and/or cooperative agreements? No
Does the public have access to information about the compensation of the senior executives in your business or organization (the legal entity to which this specific SAM record, represented by a Unique Entity ID, belongs) through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986? Not Selected
Proceedings Questions
Is your business or organization, as represented by the Unique Entity ID on this entity registration, responding to a Federal procurement opportunity that contains the provision at FAR 52.209-7, subject to the clause in FAR 52.209-9 in a current Federal contract, or applying for a Federal grant opportunity which contains the award term and condition described in 2 C.F.R. 200 Appendix XII? No
Does your business or organization, as represented by the Unique Entity ID on this specific SAM record, have current active Federal contracts and/or grants with total value (including any exercised/unexercised options) greater than $10,000,000? Not Selected
Within the last five years, had the business or organization (represented by the Unique Entity ID on this specific SAM record) and/or any of its principals, in connection with the award to or performance by the business or organization of a Federal contract or grant, been the subject of a Federal or State (1) criminal proceeding resulting in a conviction or other acknowledgment of fault; (2) civil proceeding resulting in a finding of fault with a monetary fine, penalty, reimbursement, restitution, and/or damages greater than $5,000, or other acknowledgment of fault; and/or (3) administrative proceeding resulting in a finding of fault with either a monetary fine or penalty greater than $5,000 or reimbursement, restitution, or damages greater than $100,000, or other acknowledgment of fault?
Not Selected
Last updated by Megan Moschetti on Nov 13, 2025 at 07:08 PM MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC.

Nov 14, 2025 07:01:52 PM GMT
https://sam.gov/entity/FT32L5HPW5J3/coreData?status=null Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3241 5/5/2026

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
City of Santa Ana

MARK THOMAS
ŷǻʒɦۯֽԼԼ
Exclusion Summary
Active Exclusions Records?
No
SAM Search Authorization
I authorize my entity's non-sensitive information to be displayed in SAM public search results:

Yes
Entity Types
Business Types
Entity Structure
Corporate Entity (Not Tax Exempt)
Entity Type
Business or Organization
Organization Factors
(blank)
Profit Structure
For Profit Organization
Socio-Economic Types
Check the registrant's Reps & Certs, if present, under FAR 52.212-3 or FAR 52.219-1 to determine if the entity is an SBA-certified HUBZone small business concern. Additional small business information may be found in the SBA's Dynamic Small Business Search if the entity completed the SBA supplemental pages during registration.

Financial Information
Accepts Credit Card Payments
No
Debt Subject To Offset
No
EFT Indicator
0000
CAGE Code
338X3
Electronic Funds Transfer
Account Type
Checking
Routing Number
*******27
Lock Box Number
(blank)
Financial Institution

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA
Account Number
*******99
Automated Clearing House
Phone (U.S.)
4153157678
Email
(blank)
Phone (non-U.S.)
(blank)
Fax
(blank)
Remittance Address
JPMorgan Chase Bank
P.O. Box 103616
Pasadena, California 91189
United States
Taxpayer Information
EIN
*****1490
Type of Tax
Applicable Federal Tax
Taxpayer Name

MARK THOMAS AND COMPANY INC
Tax Year (Most Recent Tax Year)
2023
Name/Title of Individual Executing Consent
President
TIN Consent Date
Nov 12, 2025
Address
2833 Junction Avenue
San Jose, California 95134
Signature

ZACHARY SIVIGLIA
Points of Contact
Accounts Receivable POC
YEN Dau, Accounting Director
[email protected]
4084535373
Last updated by Megan Moschetti on Nov 13, 2025 at 07:08 PM MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC.

Nov 14, 2025 07:01:52 PM GMT
https://sam.gov/entity/FT32L5HPW5J3/coreData?status=null Page 2 of 3 EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3242 5/5/2026

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
City of Santa Ana

MARK THOMAS
ŷǻʒɦۯֽԼԽ
Electronic Business
LORI Jeremic
[email protected]
9163819100
701 University Avenue
Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
United States
YEN Dau, Accounting Director
[email protected]
4084535373
2833 Junction Avenue
Suite 110
San Jose, California 95134
United States
Government Business
MEGAN MOSCHETTI, Marketing Director
[email protected]
9259380383
2121 N California BOULEVARD, Suite 800
Walnut Creek, California 94596
United States
Service Classifications
NAICS Codes
Primary
Yes
NAICS Codes
541330
NAICS Title
Engineering Services
237310 Highway, Street, And Bridge Construction
541320 Landscape Architectural Services
541370 Surveying And Mapping (Except Geophysical) Services Size Metrics
IGT Size Metrics
Annual Revenue (from all IGTs)
(blank)
Worldwide
Annual Receipts (in accordance with 13 CFR 121)
$124,970,916.00
Number of Employees (in accordance with 13 CFR 121)
500
Location
Annual Receipts (in accordance with 13 CFR 121)
(blank)
Number of Employees (in accordance with 13 CFR 121)
(blank)
Industry-Specific
Barrels Capacity
(blank)
Megawatt Hours
(blank)
Total Assets
(blank)
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) Information
This entity did not enter the EDI information
Disaster Response
This entity does not appear in the disaster response registry.

Last updated by Megan Moschetti on Nov 13, 2025 at 07:08 PM MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC.

Nov 14, 2025 07:01:52 PM GMT
https://sam.gov/entity/FT32L5HPW5J3/coreData?status=null Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3243 5/5/2026
&,7<2)6$17$$1$
7KLV FHUWLILFDWLRQ LV UHTXLUHG E\ WKH UHJXODWLRQV LPSOHPHQWLQJ ([HFXWLYH 2UGHU DV DPHQGHG
1RQSURFXUHPHQW 'HEDUPHQW DQG 6XVSHQVLRQ &)5 3DUW

6XESDUW & 5HVSRQVLELOLWLHV RI
3DUWLFLSDQWV5HJDUGLQJ7UDQVDFWLRQV7KHUHJXODWLRQVZHUHSXEOLVKHGDV3DUW9,,RIWKH0D\
)HGHUDO5HJLVWHU
3DJHV

DQGDVVXEVHTXHQWO\DPHQGHGLQ)HGHUDO5HJLVWHU

%HIRUHFRPSOHWLQJFHUWLILFDWLRQUHDGLQVWUXFWLRQVZKLFKDUHDQLQWHJUDOSDUWRIFHUWLILFDWLRQ
3XUVXDQWWR&)5WKHSURVSHFWLYHSULPDU\SDUWLFLSDQW LHJUDQWHH
FHUWLILHVWRWKHEHVWRI
LWVNQRZOHGJHDQGEHOLHIWKDWLWDQGLWVSULQFLSDOV

D $UHQRWSUHVHQWO\H[FOXGHGRUGLVTXDOLILHG

E +DYHQRWEHHQFRQYLFWHGZLWKLQWKHSUHFHGLQJWKUHH\HDUVRIDQ\RIWKHRIIHQVHVOLVWHG LQ&)5
D
RUKDGDFLYLOMXGJPHQWUHQGHUHGDJDLQVWWKHPIRURQHRIWKRVH RIIHQVHVZLWKLQWKDWWLPHSHULRG
F $UH QRW SUHVHQWO\ LQGLFWHG IRU RU RWKHUZLVH FULPLQDOO\ RU FLYLOO\ FKDUJHG E\ D JRYHUQPHQWHQWLW\
)HGHUDO6WDWHRUORFDO
ZLWKFRPPLVVLRQRIDQ\RIWKHRIIHQVHV
OLVWHGLQ&)5
D

DQG
G +DYH QRW KDG RQH RUPRUH SXEOLFWUDQVDFWLRQV
)HGHUDO6WDWHRUORFDO
WHUPLQDWHG
ZLWKLQWKHSUHFHGLQJWKUHH\HDUVIRUFDXVHRUGHIDXOW :KHUH WKH SURVSHFWLYH SULPDU\ SDUWLFLSDQW LV XQDEOH WR FHUWLI\ WR DQ\ RI WKH VWDWHPHQWV LQ WKLV FHUWLILFDWLRQVXFKSURVSHFWLYHSDUWLFLSDQWVKDOODWWDFKDQH[SODQDWLRQWRWKLVSURSRVDO
&RQVXOWDQW

1DPHDQG7LWOHRI2IILFLDO$XWKRUL]HGWR&HUWLI\
2Q%HKDOIRIWKH&RQVXOWDQW

'DWH
7+,6)2500867%(&203/(7('$1',1&/8'(':,7+7+(352326$/ 352326$/67+$7'2127&217$,17+,6)250:,//%(&216,'(5('1215(63216,9( $77$&+0(17,
&(57,),&$7(5(*$5',1*'(%$50(176863(16,21,1(*,%,/,7<$1' 92/817$5<(;&/86,21

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
City of Santa Ana

MARK THOMAS
ŷǻʒɦۯֽԼԿ
Ĥǻ͔˗ۯƛʞ̖˾ǻͧۯ֏ۯI̖˾͋ǻ̅ϤۯכÅ̅Ɋל
ŷǻ͸ۯƍ̖˾ɦ͔ϒʱˠˠɦۯ ̖ͧͧɊʱǻ͸ɦۯŷ͔ʱ̅Ɋʱ͋ǻˠۯװۯTʱϒʱͧʱ̖̅ۯĤǻ̅ǻʒɦ͔
Ċǻ̅Αǻ͔ϤۯԼՀۯכԽԻԽՃ
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3244 5/5/2026
&,7<2)6$17$$1$
,16758&7,21)25&(57,),&$7,21
%\ VLJQLQJ DQG VXEPLWWLQJ WKLV SURSRVDO WKH SURVSHFWLYH UHFLSLHQW RI )HGHUDO DVVLVWDQFH IXQGV LV SURYLGLQJWKHFHUWLILFDWLRQDVVHWRXWEHORZ
7KHFHUWLILFDWLRQLQWKLVFODXVHLVDPDWHULDO UHSUHVHQWDWLRQRIIDFWXSRQZKLFK UHOLDQFHZDVSODFHG ZKHQWKLVWUDQVDFWLRQZDVHQWHUHGLQWR,ILWLVODWHUGHWHUPLQHGWKDWWKHSURVSHFWLYHUHFLSLHQWRI)HGHUDO DVVLVWDQFH IXQGV NQRZLQJO\ UHQGHUHG DQ HUURQHRXV FHUWLILFDWLRQ LQ DGGLWLRQ WR RWKHU UHPHGLHV DYDLODEOHWRWKH)HGHUDO*RYHUQPHQWWKH'HSDUWPHQWRI/DERU '2/
PD\SXUVXHDYDLODEOHUHPHGLHV
LQFOXGLQJVXVSHQVLRQDQGRUGHEDUPHQW
7KHSURVSHFWLYHUHFLSLHQWRI)HGHUDODVVLVWDQFHIXQGVVKDOOSURYLGHLPPHGLDWHZULWWHQQRWLFHWRWKH SHUVRQ WR ZKLFK WKLV SURSRVDO LV VXEPLWWHG LI DW DQ\ WLPH WKH SURVSHFWLYH UHFLSLHQW RI )HGHUDO DVVLVWDQFHIXQGVOHDUQVWKDWLWVFHUWLILFDWLRQZDVHUURQHRXVZKRPVXEPLWWHGRUKDVEHFRPHHUURQHRXV E\UHDVRQRIFKDQJHGFLUFXPVWDQFHV
7KH WHUPV ³FRYHUHG WUDQVDFWLRQ´ ³GHEDUPHQW´ ³VXVSHQVLRQ´³GLVTXDOLILHG´ ³LQHOLJLEOH´ ³ORZHU WLHU FRYHUHG WUDQVDFWLRQ´ ³SDUWLFLSDQW´ ³SHUVRQ´ ³SULPDU\ FRYHUHG WUDQVDFWLRQ´ ³SULQFLSDO´ ³SURSRVDO´ DQG³YROXQWDULO\H[FOXGHG´DVXVHGLQWKLVFDXVHKDYHWKHPHDQLQJVVHWRXWLQWKH'HILQLWLRQVDQG &RYHUDJH VHFWLRQV RI UXOHV LPSOHPHQWLQJ([HFXWLYH2UGHU <RXPD\ FRQWDFWWKH SHUVRQWR
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³&HUWLILFDWLRQ 5HJDUGLQJ 'HEDUPHQW 6XVSHQVLRQ ,QHOLJLEOH RU YROXQWDULO\ H[FOXGHGIURPWKHFRYHUHGWUDQVDFWLRQ´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

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
City of Santa Ana

MARK THOMAS
ŷǻʒɦۯֽԼՀ
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 22 – 3245 5/5/2026
/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO (;+%,74
'LVFORVXUHRI/REE\LQJ$FWLYLWLHV
(;+,%,74 ',6&/2685(2)/2%%<,1*$&7,9,7,(6
COMPLETE THIS FORM TO DISCLOSE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO 31 U.S.C. 1352

1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type:
a. contract a. bid/offer/application a. initial
b. grant b. initial award b. material change
c. cooperative agreement c. post-award
d. loan For Material Change Only:
e. loan guarantee year ____ quarter _________
f. loan insurance date of last report __________

4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime:

Prime Subawardee
Tier _______ , if known
Congressional District, if known Congressional District, if known

6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description:

CFDA Number, if applicable ____________________

8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known:

10. Name and Address of Lobby Entity 11. Individuals Performing Services (If individual, last name, first name, MI) (including address if different from No. 10) (last name, first name, MI)
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary)

12. Amount of Payment (check all that apply) 14. Type of Payment (check all that apply) $ _____________ actual planned a. retainer
b. one-time fee

13. Form of Payment (check all that apply): c. commission a. cash d. contingent fee
b. in-kind; specify: nature _______________ e deferred
Value _____________ f. other, specify _________________________

15. Brief Description of Services Performed or to be performed and Date(s) of Service, including officer(s), employee(s), or member(s) contacted, for Payment Indicated in Item 12:
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary)

16. Continuation Sheet(s) attached: Yes No

17. Information requested through this form is authorized by Title 31 U.S.C. Section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying reliance was placed by the tier above when his transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. This information will be reported to Congress
semiannually and will be available for public inspection. Any person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

Signature: ________________________________________
Print Name: _______________________________________
Title: ____________________________________________
Telephone No.: ____________________ Date:___________
Authorized for Local Reproduction
Federal Use Only: Standard Form - LLL
Standard Form LLL Rev. 04-28-06
Distribution: Orig- Local Agency Project Files

Page 1 ends

Santa Ana City CouncilMay 5, 2026

Santa Ana City Council
May 5, 2026