Santa Ana City Council
May 5, 2026

LPP 08-02 May 30, 2008
Exhibit 6-A Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) Form
Federal Project No.: STPL 5063(136) Final Design: December 2012 (Federal Program Prefix-Project No., Agreement No.) (Expected Start Date) To: Jim Kaufman, Chief, Office of Local Programs From: City of Santa Ana (District Local Assistance Engineer) (Local Agency)
District 12 Jason Gabriel – (714) 647-5664
(District) (Project Manager’s Name and Telephone No.)
3347 Michelson Dr., Suite 100
Irvine, California 92612-8894
20 Civic Center Plaza, M-36
Santa Ana, California 92701
(Address) (Address)
[email protected] [email protected]
(E-mail Address) (E-mail Address)
Is this Project “ON” the Yes
State Highway System? No
IF YES, STOP HERE and contact the District Local Assistance Engineer regarding the completion of other environmental documentation.

Federal State Transportation Improvement Program
(FSTIP) http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/fedpgm.htm:
2011 21
(Currently Adopted Plan Date) (Page No.___ attach to this form) Programming
for FSTIP:

Preliminary Engineering Right of Way Construction
Prior $ 1.5M N/A $ N/A N/A $ N/A
(Fiscal Year) (Dollars) (Fiscal Year) (Dollars) (Fiscal Year) (Dollars) Project Description as Shown in RTP and FSTIP: FTIP No. ORA082610: Santa Ana Blvd Grade Separation - Near the Expansion of the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTIC). Initial planning and conceptual engineering phase. Related to ORA81621.

Detailed Project Description: (Describe the following, as applicable: purpose and need, project location and limits, required right of way acquisition, proposed facilities, staging areas, disposal and borrow sites, construction activities, and construction access.) Project Name: Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project. The City of Santa Ana, in coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Department), is proposing to grade separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at-grade railroad crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California. The purpose of the proposed project is to improve safety, as it will remove the existing at-grade conflict between vehicular traffic and rail traffic. In addition, the proposed project would reduce the congestion and inconvenience caused by this existing at-grade facility. See page 1 for complete. Project Description.
(Continue description on “Notes” sheet, last page of this Exhibit, if necessary) Preliminary Design Information:

Does the project involve any of the following? Please check the appropriate boxes and delineate on an attached map, plan, or layout including any additional pertinent information.

Yes No Yes No Yes No
Widen existing roadway Ground disturbance Easements
Increase number of through lanes Road cut/fill Equipment staging New alignment Excavation: anticipated Temporary access road/detour Capacity increasing—other maximum depth 25 feet Utility relocation (e.g., channelization) Right of way acquisition
Drainage/culverts (if yes, attach map with APN)
Realignment Flooding protection
Ramp or street closure Stream channel work Disposal/borrow sites Bridge work
Pile driving Part of larger adjacent project
Vegetation removal
Tree removal Demolition Railroad
Required Attachments:

Regional map Project location map Project footprint map (existing/proposed right of way) Engineering drawings (existing and proposed cross sections), if available Borrow/disposal site location map, if applicable (Note: all maps (except project location map and regional maps) should be consistent with the project description (minimum scale: 1" = 200').) Notes to support the conclusions of this checklist/project description continuation page (attached) EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 193 5/5/2026
Exhibit 6-A Local Assistance Procedures Manual
Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) Form

May 30, 2008 LPP 08-02
Examine the project for potential effects on the environment, direct or indirect and answer the following questions.

The “construction area,” as specified below, includes all areas of ground disturbance associated with the project, including staging and stockpiling areas and temporary access roads.

Each answer must be briefly documented on the “Notes” pages at the end of the PES Form.

A. Potential Environmental Effects Yes To Be
Determined
No
General

1. Will the project require future construction to fully utilize the design capabilities included in the proposed project?

2. Will the project generate public controversy?
Noise

3. Is the project a Type I project as defined in 23 CFR 772.5(h); “construction on new location or the physical alteration of an existing highway, which significantly changes either the horizontal or vertical alignment or increases the number of through-traffic lanes”?

4. Does the project have the potential for adverse construction-related noise impact (such as related to pile driving)?
Air Quality

5. Is the project in a NAAQS non-attainment or maintenance area?

6. Is the project exempt from the requirement that a conformity determination be made? (If “Yes,” state which conformity exemption in 40 CFR 93.126, Table 2 applies): railroad/highway crossing

7. Is the project exempt from regional conformity? (If “Yes,” state which conformity exemption in 40 CFR 93.127, Table 3 applies):

8. If project is not exempt from regional conformity, (If “No” on Question #7) Is project in a metropolitan non-attainment/maintenance area? Is project in an isolated rural non-attainment area?
Is project in a CO, PM10 and/or PM2.5 non-attainment/maintenance area? Hazardous Materials/Hazardous Waste

9. Is there potential for hazardous materials (including underground or aboveground tanks, etc.) and/or hazardous waste (including oil/water separators, waste oil, asbestos-containing material, lead-based paint, ADL, etc.) within or immediately adjacent to the construction area? Water Quality/Resources

10. Does the project have the potential to impact water resources (rivers, streams, bays, inlets, lakes, drainage sloughs) within or immediately adjacent to the project area?

11. Is the project within a designated sole-source aquifer? Coastal Zone

12. Is the project within the State Coastal Zone, San Francisco Bay, or Suisun Marsh? Floodplain

13. Is the construction area located within a regulatory floodway or within the base floodplain (100-year) elevation of a watercourse or lake?
Wild and Scenic Rivers

14. Is the project within or immediately adjacent to a Wild and Scenic River System? Biological Resources

15. Is there a potential for federally listed threatened or endangered species, or their critical habitat or essential fish habitat to occur within or adjacent to the construction area?

16. Does the project have the potential to directly or indirectly affect migratory birds, or their nests or eggs (such as vegetation removal, box culvert replacement/repair, bridge work, etc.)?

17. Is there a potential for wetlands to occur within or adjacent to the construction area? EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 194 5/5/2026
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 6-A
Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) Form

LPP 08-02 May 30, 2008

18. Is there a potential for agricultural wetlands to occur within or adjacent to the construction area?

19. Is there a potential for the introduction or spread of invasive plant species? Sections 4(f) and 6(f)

20. Are there any historic sites or publicly owned public parks, recreation areas, wildlife or waterfowl refuges (Section 4[f]) within or immediately adjacent to the construction area?

21. Does the project have the potential to affect properties acquired or improved with Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (Section 6[f]) funds?
Visual Resources

22. Does the project have the potential to affect any visual or scenic resources? Relocation Impacts

23. Will the project require the relocation of residential or business properties? Land Use, Community, and Farmland Impacts

24. Will the project require any right of way, including partial or full takes? Consider construction easements and utility relocations.

25. Is the project inconsistent with plans and goals adopted by the community?

26. Does the project have the potential to divide or disrupt neighborhoods/communities?

27. Does the project have the potential to disproportionately affect low-income and minority populations?

28. Will the project require the relocation of public utilities?

29. Will the project affect access to properties or roadways?

30. Will the project involve changes in access control to the State Highway System (SHS)?

31. Will the project involve the use of a temporary road, detour, or ramp closure?

32. Will the project reduce available parking?

33. Will the project construction encroach on state or federal lands?

34. Will the project convert any farmland to a different use or impact any farmlands? Cultural Resources

35. Is there National Register listed, or potentially eligible historic properties, or archaeological resources within or immediately adjacent to the construction area? (Note: Caltrans PQS answers question #35 )

36. Is the project adjacent to, or would it encroach on Tribal land? EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 195 5/5/2026
Exhibit 6-A Local Assistance Procedures Manual
Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) Form

May 30, 2008 LPP 08-02
For Sections B, C, and D, check appropriate box to indicate required technical studies, coordination, permits, or approvals.

B. Required Technical Studies
and Analyses
C. Coordination D. Anticipated
Actions/Permits/Approvals
Traffic
Check one:

Traffic Study Caltrans Approval
Technical Memorandum Caltrans Approval
Discussion in ED Only Caltrans Approval
Noise
Check as applicable:

Traffic Related
Construction Related
Check one:

Noise Study Report Caltrans Approval
NADR Caltrans Approval
Technical Memorandum Caltrans Approval
Discussion in ED Only Caltrans Approval
Air Quality
Check as applicable:

Traffic Related
Construction Related
Check one:

Air Quality Report Caltrans Approval
Technical Memorandum Caltrans Approval
Discussion in ED Only Caltrans Approval
FHWA Conformity Finding (6005 CEs, EAs, EISs)
Caltrans Conformity Finding (6004 CEs)
Regional Agency PM10/PM2.5 Interagency Consultation
Hazardous Materials/
Hazardous Waste
Check as applicable:

Initial Site Assessment
(Phase 1)
Caltrans Approval
Preliminary Site Assessment
(Phase 2)
Caltrans Approval
Discussion in ED Only Caltrans Approval
Cal EPA DTSC Review Database
Local Agency Review Database
Water Quality/Resources
Check as applicable:

Water Quality Assess. Report Caltrans Approval
Technical Memorandum Caltrans Approval
Discussion in ED Only Caltrans Approval
Sole-Source Aquifer
(Districts 5, 6 and 11) EPA (S.F. Regional Office) Approval of Analysis in ED Coastal Zone CCC Coastal Zone Consistency Determination EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 196 5/5/2026
Exhibit 6-A
Assistance Procedures Manual
Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) Form

LPP 07-07 November 20, 2007
B. Required Technical Studies
and Analyses
C. Coordination D. Anticipated
Actions/Permits/Approvals
Floodplain
Check as applicable:

Location Hydraulic Study Caltrans Approval
Floodplain Evaluation Report Caltrans Approval
Summary Floodplain
Encroachment Report
Caltrans Approval
Caltrans Only Practicable Alternative Finding
FHWA Approves significant encroachments and
concurs in Only Practicable Alternative
Findings
Wild and Scenic Rivers
River Managing Agency Wild and Scenic Rivers Determination Biological Resources
Check as applicable:

NES, Minimal Impact Caltrans Approval
NES
BA Caltrans Approves for Consultation
USFWS Section 7 Informal/Formal Consultation
NOAA Fisheries
EFH Evaluation NOAA Fisheries MSA Consultation
Bio-Acoustic Evaluation NOAA Fisheries Approval
Technical Memorandum Caltrans Approval
Wetlands
Check as applicable:

WD and Assessment Caltrans Approval
ACOE Wetland Verification
NRCS Agricultural Wetland Verification
Caltrans Wetlands Only Practicable Alternative
Finding
Invasive Plants
Discussion in ED Only (NES) Caltrans Approval
Section 4(f)
Check as applicable:

Caltrans Determine Temporary Occupancy
De minimis Caltrans De minimis finding
Programmatic 4(f) Evaluation Caltrans Approval
Type: ___________________
Individual 4(f) Evaluation Caltrans Approval
Agency with Jurisdiction
SHPO
DOI
HUD
USDA

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 197 5/5/2026
Exhibit 6-A Local Assistance Procedures Manual
Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) Form

May 30, 2008 LPP 08-02
B. Required Technical Studies
and Analyses
C. Coordination D. Anticipated
Actions/Permits/Approvals

Section 6(f)
Agency with Jurisdiction
NPS Determines Consistency with Long-Term
Management Plan
NPS Approves Conversion
Visual Resources
Check one:

Visual Impact Assessment Caltrans Approval
Technical Memorandum Caltrans Approval
Discussion in ED Only Caltrans Approval
Relocation Impacts
Check one:

Relocation Impact Memo Caltrans Approval
Relocation Impact Study Caltrans Approval
Relocation Impact Report Caltrans Approval
Land Use and
Community Impacts
Check one:

CIA Caltrans Approval
Technical Memorandum Caltrans Approval
Discussion in ED Only Caltrans Approval
Construction/Encroachment
on State Lands
Check as applicable:

SLC Jurisdiction SLC SLC Lease
Caltrans Jurisdiction Caltrans Encroachment Permit
SP Jurisdiction SP Encroachment Permit
Construction/Encroachment
on Federal Lands
Federal Agency with
Jurisdiction
Encroachment Permit
Construction/Encroachment
On Indian Trust Lands
Bureau of Indian Affairs Right of Way Permit
Farmlands
Check one:

CIA Caltrans Approval
Technical Memorandum Caltrans Approval
Discussion in ED Only Caltrans Approval
Check as applicable:

Form AD 1006 NRCS Approves Conversion
CDOC Approves Conversion
Conversion to Non-Agri Use ACOE
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 198 5/5/2026
Exhibit 6-A
Assistance Procedures Manual
Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) Form

LPP 07-07 November 20, 2007
B. Required Technical Studies
and Analyses
C. Coordination D. Anticipated Actions/Permits/
Approvals
Cultural Resources
(PQS completes this section)
Check as applicable:

Caltrans PQS Screened Undertaking
APE Map Caltrans PQS and DLAE Approves APE Map
Local Preservation Groups
and/or Native American
Tribes
Provides Comments Regarding Concerns
with Project
HPSR Caltrans Approves for Consultation
ASR
HRER
Finding of Effect Report Caltrans Concurs on No Effect, No Adverse Effect with Standard Conditions
SHPO Letter of Concurrence on Eligibility, No
Adverse Effect without Standard
MOA Caltrans Approves MOA
SHPO Approves MOA
ACHP (if requested) Approves MOA
Permits
Copies of permits and a list of ACOE Section 404 Nationwide Permit mitigation commitments are ACOE Section 404 Individual Permit mandatory submittals following Caltrans/ACOE/EPA NEPA/404 Integration MOU NEPA approval. USFWS
NOAA Fisheries
ACOE Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Permit
USCG USCG Bridge Permit
RWQCB Section 401 Water Quality Certification
CDFG Section 1602 Streambed Alteration
Agreement
RWQCB NPDES Permit
CCC Coastal Zone Permit
Local Agency
BCDC BCDC Permit
Notes: Additional studies may be required for other federal agencies.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 199 5/5/2026
Exhibit 6-A Local Assistance Procedures Manual
Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) Form

May 30, 2008 LPP 08-02
ACHP = Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
ACOE = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
ADL = Aerially Deposited Lead
APE = Area of Potential Effect
APN = Assessor Parcel Number
ASR = Archaeological Survey Report
BA = Biological Assessment
BCDC = Bay Conservation and Development Commission
BE = Biological Evaluation
BO = Biological Opinion
Cal EPA = California Environmental Protection Agency
CCC = California Coastal Commission
CDFG = California Department of Fish and Game
CDOC = California Department of Conservation
CE = Categorical Exclusion
CIA = Community Impact Assessment
CWA = Clean Water Act
DLAE = District Local Assistance Engineer
DOI = U.S. Department of Interior
DTSC = Department of Toxic Substances Control
EA = Environmental Assessment
ED = Environmental Document
EFH = Essential Fish Habitat
EIS = Environmental Impact Statement
EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FEMA = Federal Emergency Management Agency
FHWA = Federal Highway Administration
FONSI = Finding of No Significant Impacted
FTIP = Federal Transportation Improvement Program
HPSR = Historic Property Survey Report
HRER = Historical Resources Evaluation Report
HUD = U.S. Housing and Urban Development
MOA = Memorandum of Agreement
MSA = Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act
NEPA = National Environmental Policy Act
NADR = Noise Abatement Decision Report
NES = Natural Environment Study
NHPA = National Historic Preservation Act
NOAA = National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service
NPDES = National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPS = National Park Service
NRCS = Natural Resources Conservation Service
PM10 = Particulate Matter 10 Microns in Diameter or Less PM2.5 = Particulate Matter 2.5 Microns in Diameter or Less PMP = Project Management Plan
PQS = Professionally Qualified Staff
ROD = Record of Decision
RTIP = Regional Transportation Improvement Program
RTP = Regional Transportation Plan
RWQCB = Regional Water Quality Control Board
SER = Standard Environmental Reference
SEP = Senior Environmental Planner
SHPO = State Historic Preservation Officer
SLC = State Lands Commission
SP = State Parks
TIP = Transportation Improvement Program
USCG = U.S. Coast Guard
USDA = U.S. Department of Agriculture
USFWS = U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
WD = Wetland Delineation
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 200 5/5/2026
Exhibit 6-A
Assistance Procedures Manual
Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) Form

LPP 07-07 November 20, 2007
E. Preliminary Environmental Document Classification (NEPA) Based on the evaluation of the project, the environmental document to be developed should be:

Check one:

Environmental Impact Statement (Note: Engagement with participating agencies in accordance with SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 required)
Compliance with SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 regarding Participating Agencies required Complex Environmental Assessment
Routine Environmental Assessment
Categorical Exclusion without required technical studies.

Categorical Exclusion with required technical studies
(if Categorical Exclusion is selected, check one of the following):

Section 6004
23 CFR 771 activity (c)( )
23 CFR 771 activity (d) (3)
Activity listed in the Section 6004 MOU
Section 6005
F. Public Availability and Public Hearing
Check as applicable:

Not Required
Notice of Availability of Environmental Document
Public Meeting
Notice of Opportunity for a Public Hearing
Public Hearing Required
G. Signatures
Local Agency Staff and/or Consultant Signature
June 17, 2011 (949) 333-6618
(Signature of Preparer) (Date) (Telephone No.)
Brian Calvert
(Name)
Local Agency Project Engineer Signature
This document was prepared under my supervision, in accordance with the Local Assistance Procedures Manual, Exhibit 6-B, “Instructions for Completing the Preliminary Environmental Study Form.”

(Signature of Local Agency) (Date) (Telephone No.)
June 27, 2011 (714) 647-5664
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 201 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 202 5/5/2026
Preliminary Environment Study (PES)
1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Santa Ana, in coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Department), is proposing to grade separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at-grade railroad crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California (see Figures 1 and 2).

Currently, 66 trains cross Santa Ana Boulevard at this location on weekdays. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at-grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation, including depressing the profile of Santa Ana Boulevard under the adjacent Metrolink tracks to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; improve emergency response times; and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard.
“The proposed project improvements extend along Santa Ana Boulevard from approximately Santiago Street at the west end to the west side of the Interstate 5 (I-5) southbound off-ramp intersection with Santa Ana Boulevard.”As part of the grade separation the proposed project includes: minor improvements to the Santa Ana Boulevard/Santiago Street intersection; terminating Logan Street north of Santa Ana Boulevard by constructing a cul-de-sac; and improvements to Fuller Street, both north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard (see Figure 3).

The project proposes to relocate Santa Ana Boulevard approximately 30 feet south of its existing alignment, to construct a utility corridor on the north side of the roadway, and to maintain the existing lane configuration of three (3) lanes in each direction for the entire length of the project.

The proposed project will include the construction of an underpass bridge (i.e., roadway going under the railroad tracks) and retaining walls, installation of paving, curbs, gutters, medians, sidewalks, streetlights, landscape and irrigation features, drainage facilities, and the relocation of utilities.

During construction the project proposes to construct a temporary two track shoofly railroad alignment for the purpose of constructing the underpass structure while maintaining railroad service, which is to be constructed beginning just south of the existing Metrolink crossing of I-5 and terminating south of the Santa Ana Transportation Center near 4th Street. This shoofly alignment would be located east of the existing railroad alignment. The project also proposes to construct a two-lane detour road south of Santa Ana Boulevard, which would be used by traffic during the construction of the underpass bridge and its approaches. The project also proposes to use Fruit Street as a detour route during the final phase of construction. New right-of-way, including both permanent acquisition and temporary easements, will be needed for the construction of the shoofly and detour road.

Construction staging areas for the proposed project would potentially be located on the following properties: APNs 398-093-13, 398-092-12, and 398-207-01. The disposal site for the proposed project, if needed, will be selected by the contractor. Any environmental clearances related to the disposal site will be obtained by the contractor prior to construction.

The proposed project is included in the 2008 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and 2011 costconstrained Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) (federal approval date of December 14, 2010) as project ID ORA082610. The project as proposed is consistent with the 2011 FTIP description.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 203 5/5/2026
2 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FORM RESPONSES
General

1. Will the project require future construction to fully utilize the design capabilities included in the proposed project?
The proposed project, as designed, would provide a number of potential traffic-related, environmental, and safety-related benefits, without future construction:
 Elimination of traffic delays related to the existing Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at-grade crossing at Santa Ana Boulevard;  assist in vehicle emissions reduction (along Santa Ana Boulevard) related to motorists waiting for trains to traverse the existing at-grade crossing;  decrease in delays and improved travel time along Santa Ana Boulevard, which in turn reduces travel cost;
 decrease in emergency response times related to existing at-grade crossing traffic delays; and
 Reduction or elimination of rear-end collisions, and elimination of potential broadside collisions with trains, along Santa Ana Boulevard at the OCTA Metrolink tracks.

The proposed project would be able to function independently, and would not require future construction to fully utilize the design capabilities included in the proposed project.

2. Will the project generate public controversy? No known public controversy exists regarding the proposed project. There is no reason to expect substantial public interest in the project from a community standpoint based on potential environmental effects. The proposed project is expected to provide a number of potential traffic-related, environmental, and safety-related benefits to the community. It is anticipated that any local interest in the environmental impacts of the project would be primarily related to typical concerns related to grade separation projects such as property acquisition and visual and noise impacts for residents located immediately adjacent to the project alignment. This will be further evaluated in the Community Impact Assessment that is prepared and during the public information meeting that is held for the project.

Noise

3. Is the project a Type I project as defined in 23 CFR 772.5(h); “construction on new location or the physical alteration of an existing highway, which significantly changes either the horizontal or vertical alignment or increases the number of through-traffic lanes”? According to 23 CFR 772.5(h), a Type I project involves “construction on new location or the physical alteration of an existing highway which significantly changes either the horizontal or vertical alignment or increases the number of through-traffic lanes.” The proposed project involves the grade separation of an existing road/railroad crossing, which would involve the construction of an undercrossing (roadway passing under the railroad tracks). This would alter the vertical alignment of the roadway, thus the proposed project is a Type I project.

4. Does the project have the potential for adverse construction-related noise impact (such as related to pile driving)? The proposed project will likely involve pile driving during construction. This type of work would be limited in duration; however, this will be further evaluated and addressed in the Noise Study.

Air Quality

5. Is the project in a National Ambient Air Quality Standards non-attainment or maintenance area? The proposed project is located in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). As shown below, the State of California has designated the SCAB as being a nonattainment area for ozone (O3) and EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 204 5/5/2026
Preliminary Environment Study (PES)
3 particulate matter (PM10). At the federal level, EPA has also designated this area as being a nonattainment area for O3 (8-hour standard), PM10, and PM2.5.

Selected Criteria Pollutants: Attainment Status for the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) Pollutants
Status
Federal State
O3 (one-hour standard) — Extreme Nonattainment
O3 (eight-hour standard) Nonattainment, Severe-17 —
PM10 Serious Nonattainment Nonattainment
PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment
CO Attainment Attainment
NO2 Unclassified/Attainment Attainment
SO2 Attainment Attainment

6. Is the project exempt from the requirement that a conformity determination be made? (If “Yes,” state which conformity exemption in 40 CFR 93.126, Table 2 applies). Yes, the proposed project is exempt from the requirement to determine conformity under the Safety heading in 40 CFR

93.126 (railroad/highway crossing). However, an Air Quality Report will be prepared to address any potential operational or construction period impacts.

7. Is the project exempt from regional conformity? (If “Yes,” state which conformity exemption in 40 CFR 93.127, Table 3 applies). Not applicable based on response to Question 6.

8. If project is not exempt from regional conformity? (If “No” on Question #7). Not applicable based on response to Question 6.

Hazardous Materials/Hazardous Waste

9. Is there potential for hazardous materials (including underground or aboveground tanks, etc.) and/or hazardous waste (including oil/water separators, waste oil, asbestos-containing material, lead-based paint, ADL, etc.) within or immediately adjacent to the construction area? Based on a review of readily available database information, it is not anticipated that any hazardous materials or waste sites would be impacted by the proposed project as no known sites were identified within limits of disturbance for the proposed project and it is not anticipated that the project would impact groundwater. A review of the California Department of Toxic Substances’ EnviroStor database revealed that the nearest site that utilizes hazardous waste and substances on site is the Orange County Register (located at 625 N. Grand Avenue). This site is located approximately 800 feet south of the east end of the project site. However, although not identified in the database search, a field review of the project site indicated that several industrial and warehouse type uses are present and these have a high potential for using or storing hazardous materials. In particular, the County Maintenance Yard located at 1102 Fruit Street has gas pumps and above ground tanks on site, and a hazardous materials placard was identified on the Orange County Public Works property located at 1143 Fruit Street. The Initial Site Assessment (ISA) that is prepared for the proposed project will further evaluate the potential for hazardous materials/waste concerns related to the proposed project.

Water Quality

10. Does the project have the potential to impact water resources (rivers, streams, bays, inlets, lakes, drainage sloughs) within or immediately adjacent to the project area? There are no rivers, streams, bays, inlets, lakes, or drainage sloughs located within or immediately adjacent to the proposed project based on an initial field review of the project site. While the project is not located near any rivers, streams, bays, inlets, lakes, or drainage sloughs, the project areas drainage system EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 205 5/5/2026
4 will ultimately discharge into waters of the United States and the State of California, making the project subject to the requirements of a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Additionally, other impacts could potentially occur related to groundwater, dewatering during construction, and the potential need for a pump system to remove storm water from the lower elevations of the project area. This will be further evaluated in the Water Quality Memorandum that is prepared for the proposed project.

11. Is the project within a designated sole-source aquifer? The designated sole-source aquifers in California are located in the counties of Fresno, Santa Cruz, Butte, and Imperial. The proposed project is located in Orange County and not near any of California’s designated sole-source aquifers.

Coastal Zone

12. Is the project within the State Coastal Zone, San Francisco Bay, or Suisun Marsh? The State Coastal Zone is designated as the coastal area that is generally located within one mile of the Pacific Coast. The project area is considerably further from the coast and not within an area regulated by the State Coastal Zone Management Agency (SCZMA).

Floodplain

13. Is the construction area located within a regulatory floodway or within the base floodplain (100-year) elevation of a watercourse or lake? As identified on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) number 06059C0163J, dated December 3, 2009, for Orange County, California and Incorporated Areas the proposed project is not located with a 1-percent annual chance (100-year) floodplain or a regulatory floodway. The proposed project is located in unshaded Zone X, which is defined as areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance (500-year) floodplain.

Wild and Scenic Rivers

14. Is the project within or immediately adjacent to a Wild and Scenic River System? There are no wild and scenic rivers located in or adjacent to the study area according to the Wild and Scenic River System list that is maintained by the National Park Service.

Biological Resources

15. Is there a potential for federally listed threatened or endangered species, or their critical habitat or essential fish habitat to occur within or adjacent to the construction area? A review of the California Natural Diversity Database and California Nation Plant Society database was performed. In addition a preliminary review of the project site was conducted. The project site includes a few heavily disturbed lots with ruderal vegetation. Based on these reviews, no federally listed or threatened or endangered species occur, or have the potential to occur, on or adjacent to the project site. In addition, no critical habitat for any federally listed threatened or endangered species is present. This will be further documented in the Natural Environment Study (Minimal Impact) (NES [MI]) that is prepared.

16. Does the project have the potential to directly or indirectly affect migratory birds, or their nests or eggs (such as vegetation removal, box culvert replacement/repair, bridge work, etc.)? The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) makes it unlawful at any time, by any means or in any manner, to pursue, hunt, take, capture, or kill migratory birds. The law applies to the removal of nests as well as the abandonment of nests occupied by migratory birds during the breeding season. Due to the presence of vegetation and trees within and adjacent to the identified limits of disturbance for the proposed project there is the potential for impacts to migratory and nesting birds during construction activities. This will be further evaluated and addressed in the NES (MI) that is prepared for the proposed project. It is anticipated that tree removal associated with project would occur outside of the bird breeding season. If tree removal would occur during the bird breeding season (February 15 through August 15), a pre-construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted prior to any ground disturbance or vegetation removal.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 206 5/5/2026
Preliminary Environment Study (PES)
5 17. Is there a potential for wetlands to occur within or adjacent to the construction area? Based on a preliminary review of the project site no surface waters are present. Per the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps, available through the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) field office, and the Wetlands Online Mapper (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wetlands Online Mapper, http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html), which is based on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory database, there are no wetlands on, immediately adjacent to, or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The potential for wetlands to occur within or adjacent to the project, and the potential for the project to affect wetlands, if any, will be confirmed during the detailed field evaluation performed as part of the NES (MI). Based on a preliminary review of the project site wetlands are not anticipated to be encountered within or adjacent to the identified limits of disturbance.

18. Is there a potential for agricultural wetlands to occur within or adjacent to the construction area? According to the Wetlands Online Mapper (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wetlands Online Mapper, http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html), which is based on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory database, there are no wetlands on, immediately adjacent to, or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The potential for agricultural wetlands to occur within or adjacent to the project, and the potential for the project to affect agricultural wetlands, if any, will be confirmed during the field evaluation performed as part of the NES (MI). Based on a preliminary review of the project site wetlands, including agricultural wetlands, are not anticipated to be encountered within or adjacent to the identified limits of disturbance.

19. Is there a potential for the introduction or spread of invasive plant species? During construction there would be the potential for the spread of invasive species through introduction from construction equipment and other outside sources. Standard Department construction best management practices (BMPs) would be implemented during construction to limit the potential for the introduction or spread of invasive species. This will be addressed in the NES (MI) that is prepared.

Sections 4(f) and 6(f)

20. Are there any historic sites or publicly owned public parks, recreation areas, wildlife or waterfowl refuges (Section 4[f]) within or immediately adjacent to the construction area? It is not anticipated that any Section 4(f) resources would be impacted by the proposed project as no publicly owned parks or recreation areas, wildlife or waterfowl refuges, or known historic sites are located within or immediately adjacent to the proposed project site. One site, the Orange County Highway Department (now Road Department) industrial/maintenance yard located at 1102 East Fruit Street (buildings number 3 through 9) was previously identified as being eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. However, this finding does not appear to be appropriate for this site and will be addressed in the Historic Property Survey Report/Historical Resources Evaluation Report that is prepared for the project. Is anticipated that this site will be determined to not be eligible for listing on the NRHP and therefore would not be a Section 4(f) resource.

21. Does the project have the potential to affect properties acquired or improved with Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (Section 6[f]) funds? No parks are located within or adjacent to the proposed project site. No properties acquired with Land and Water Conservation Fund (Section 6(f)) funds would be impacted by the proposed project.

Visual Resources

22. Does the project have the potential to affect any visual or scenic resources? The project vicinity consists of primarily light industrial and warehouse uses to the east of Lincoln Avenue. In the northwest quadrant of the Santa Ana Boulevard/OCTA Metrolink at-grade crossing are predominantly single-family uses, while the southwest quadrant is the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center.

To the west of Santiago Street to the north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard multi-family residential units are present. The Visual Impact Assessment Guide was completed for the proposed project.

Based on a preliminary review of the project site and the information known about the project area the proposed project received a scope of 17. Based on these results an abbreviated Visual Impact EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 207 5/5/2026
6 Assessment is anticipated for the proposed project. Where feasible the project would include landscaping and would provide architectural elements on the new structure. This will be further addressed in the Visual Impact Assessment that is prepared.

Relocation Impacts

23. Will the project require the relocation of residential or business properties? The proposed project would not require the relocation of any residences. A total of sixteen commercial parcels would be acquired, which would require the relocation of approximately eleven businesses and three County buildings/operations. Two acquisition parcels do not currently have tenants. This will be further evaluated in the Relocation Impact Study and Community Impact Assessment that are prepared.

Land Use, Community, and Farmlands Impacts

24. Will the project require any right of way, including partial or full takes? Consider construction easements and utility relocations. The proposed project would require the full acquisition of sixteen properties, which all contain commercial/industrial/maintenance facility uses and are presented below. As shown below, partial acquisition and temporary construction easements (TCEs) would be required on two properties and TCEs only would be required on three properties. This will be further evaluated in the Relocation Impact Study and Community Impact Assessment that are prepared.

Acquisitions
Parcel No. Full Acquisition Partial Acquisition Temporary Construction Easement Status
398-101-15 No Yes Yes Active
398-101-16 No Yes Yes Active
398-208-01 Yes No No Active
398-207-01 Yes No No Active
398-361-07 Yes No No Active
398-361-12 Yes No No Active
931-104-67 Yes No No Active
931-104-68 Yes No No Active
398-362-01 Yes No No Active
398-093-13 Yes No No Vacant
398-093-08 Yes No No Active
398-093-07 Yes No No Active
398-093-06 Yes No No Active
398-093-05 Yes No No Active
398-093-04 Yes No No Active
398-093-03 Yes No No Active
398-093-01 Yes No No Active
398-092-02 Yes No No Vacant
398-092-13 No No Yes Active
398-092-14 No No Yes Active

25. Is the project inconsistent with plans and goals adopted by the community? The City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element (Adopted February 2, 1998 and reformatted January 2010) EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 208 5/5/2026
Preliminary Environment Study (PES)
7 identifies Santa Ana as a primarily arterial, which is defined as a four- or six-lane divided arterial, which is consistent with the proposed project design. The proposed project would be consistent with plans and goals adopted by the community. The proposed project is consistent with the goals that are included in the City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element. Specifically it meets the following goals.
 Goal 1, “Provide and maintain a comprehensive circulation system that facilitates the efficient movement of people and goods throughout the City, and enhances its economic viability.” This is achieved by meeting Policy 1.10, which is to “Provide barrier-free accessibility throughout the circulation system.”
 Goal 2, “Provide design and construction that facilitates safe utilization of the City’s transportation system.” This is achieved by meeting Policy 2.7, which is to “Continue design practices which facilitate the safe use of circulation systems.

Consistency with plans adopted by the community will be further evaluated further in the Community Impact Assessment that is prepared for the proposed project.

26. Does the project have the potential to divide or disrupt neighborhoods/communities? The proposed project would be constructed along an existing roadway and would not divide a neighborhood/community. The proposed project includes a sidewalk along both sides of the overcrossing which will provide an enhanced connection across the railroad tracks; pedestrians currently have to cross the railroad tracks at-grade. The pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Santa Ana Boulevard and Santiago Street, which is the primary pedestrian access across Santa Ana Boulevard, would remain as part of the proposed project. The proposed project would result in the full and partial acquisition of several parcels (businesses), see Items 23 and 24 above, and would also involve construction adjacent to single-family residences, which could cause temporary disruptions within the affected neighborhood. This will be evaluated further in the Community Impact Assessment that is prepared for the proposed project.

27. Does the project have the potential to disproportionately affect low-income and minority populations? All projects involving a federal action (funding, permit, or land) must comply with Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, signed by President Bill Clinton on February 11, 1994. This Executive Order directs federal agencies to take the appropriate and necessary steps to identify and address disproportionately high and adverse effects of federal projects on the health or environment of minority and low-income populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law. The proposed project is located within Census Tract 744.05, Block Groups 1, 2, and 3 (located along the north side of Santa Ana Boulevard) and Census Tract 744.06, Block Groups 1 and 3 (located along the south side of Santa Ana Boulevard). As shown in the following table, the project area (defined as Census Tract 744.05, Block Groups 1, 2, and 3, and Census Tract 744.06 Block Groups 1 and 3) has a lower percentage of individuals identified as White than Orange County (County) and the City of Santa Ana (City); however, the difference between the project area and the City is much less than between the project area and Orange County. The percentage of individuals identified as Latino/Hispanic is greater for the project area than for Orange County and the City with the difference between the project area and the County being much greater than between the project area and the City. For all other groups (African-American, American Indian/Alaskan Native, Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian, and Other races/Ethnicities) the percentage within the project area is less than the percentages identified for the County and the City.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 209 5/5/2026
8 Population and Ethnic Distribution
Area
2000
Population
White
(%)
Latino/
Hispanic
(of any
race)
(%)
AfricanAmerican
(%)
Asian
(%)
American
Indian/
Alaskan
Native
(%)
Pacific
Islander/
Native
Hawaiian
(%)
Other
races/
Ethnicities*
Orange
County 2,846,289 51.26 30.76 1.50 13.48 0.30 0.30 0.16
City of
Santa Ana 337,977 12.42 76.07 1.27 8.70 0.26 0.26 0.08
Project
Area** 8,843 7.24 89.96 0.70 1.27 0.21 0.21 0.06
* For Census Tract level, data classified as “Some other race alone” applied ** Includes Census Tract 744.05 Block Groups 1, 2, and 2 and Census Tract 744.06 Block Groups 1 and 3 As shown in the following table the median household income for the Census tracts where the project is located (i.e., Census tracts Census Tract 744.05, Block Groups 1, 2, and 3, and Census Tract 744.06 Block Groups 1 and 3) is below that reflected for Orange County and the City of Santa Ana.

Low income is defined based on the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) poverty guidelines. For 1999 (commensurate with available income data), this was $16,700 for a family of four, and for 2011 (current), it is $22,350. Therefore, although the project area has a lower median household income than for the County and the City, the project area is not considered a low income area as it is above the DHHS poverty guidelines.

Median Household Income
Census Tract/City 1999 Median Household Income
Orange County $58,820
City of Santa Ana $43,412
Project Area” $28,947
** Includes Census Tract 744.05 Block Groups 1, 2, and 2 and Census Tract 744.06 Block Groups 1 and 3 Based on a comparative analysis of demographic (i.e. race and ethnicity) and income characteristics of the study area with that of the City or County populations, the study area population is characterized as having a higher proportion of minority groups (i.e., Latino/Hispanic); and as having a lower income (though not defined as low income). However, the difference between the project area and the City percentages are not grossly different. Based on the above discussion the project could have impacts per Executive Order 12898 regarding environmental justice. However, no residential acquisitions would occur as part of the proposed project; and in addition, all residences located east of Santiago Street are located along the north side of Santa Ana Boulevard. As part of the project Santa Ana Boulevard would be shifted to the south and away from these residences.

Therefore, it is not anticipated that the proposed project would cause disproportionately high and adverse effects on any minority or low-income populations as per Executive Order 12898 regarding environmental justice. In addition the proposed project would comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes. This will be further addressed in the Community Impact Assessment that is prepared for the proposed project.

28. Will the project require the relocation of public utilities? The proposed project would require the relocation of the following utilities.
 Southern California Gas – two-, three-, and four-inch gas lines  Southern California Edison – 66 kilovolt (kV) and 12 kV electric lines  City of Santa Ana – 8-, 12-, and 20-inch water lines and 6-, 8-, and 18-inch sewer lines  AT&T – transmission fiber optic and distribution fiber optic EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 210 5/5/2026
Preliminary Environment Study (PES)
9  Time Warner – fiber optic cable
 Metrolink – signal and communication fiber optic
The affected utilities shall be relocated in accordance with State law and regulations and County and City policies. There shall be ongoing coordination between the City of Santa Ana, the affected agencies, and the utility companies in order to minimize potential disruption of utility service. No adverse effects to public services are anticipated.

29. Will the project affect access to properties or roadways? Access would be modified at the following APNs.
 398-092-11 (temporary and permanent impact) – driveway approach would be reconstructed within the public right-of-way
 398-101-16 (temporary and permanent impact) – access would be relocated from Fuller Street to Fruit Street
 398-202-09 (temporary impact) – driveway approach would be reconstructed within the public right-of-way
 398-205-05 (temporary impact) - driveway approach would be reconstructed within the public right-of-way
 398-361-01 (temporary impact) – access along Terminal Street may be temporarily impacted during construction
 398-204-04 (Santa Ana Transportation Center) (temporary and permanent impact) – reconstruction of the access and circulation would occur to ensure that access and circulation remains suitable within the Santa Ana Transportation Center With regard to roadways, the connection of Logan Street to Santa Ana Boulevard will be permanently eliminated and a cul-de-sac will be constructed at the end of Logan Street. Impacts to property and roadway access will be evaluated further in the Community Impact Assessment that is prepared.

30. Will the project involve changes in access control to the State Highway System (SHS)? The proposed project would not result in a change in access control. Some construction activity will occur to the west of the intersection of Santa Ana Boulevard and the Interstate 5 off- and on-ramps, however, this would not result in a change in access control.

31. Will the project involve the use of a temporary road, detour, or ramp closure? During construction the project proposes to construct a temporary two track shoofly (temporary) railroad alignment for the purpose of constructing the underpass structure while maintaining railroad service, which is to be constructed beginning just south of the existing Metrolink crossing of I-5 and terminating south of the Santa Ana Transportation Center near 4th Street. This shoofly alignment would be located east of the existing railroad alignment. The project also proposes to construct a twolane detour road south of Santa Ana Boulevard, which would be used by traffic during the construction of the underpass bridge and its approaches. The project also proposes to use Fruit Street as a detour route during the final phase of construction. New right-of-way, including both permanent acquisition and temporary easements, will be needed for the construction of the shoofly and detour road.

32. Will the project reduce available parking? As shown under Item 24, there would be sixteen full acquisition parcels as part of the proposed project. The parking at all of these locations would be removed, however, this parking is for the property where the use would be removed and therefore the parking would no longer be required. This situation is present for all but one of the sixteen full acquisition parcels. At APN 398-208-01 there are approximately 13 parking spaces. These spaces are used by APN 398-101-16. The project shall require a portion of the existing building located on parcel 398-101-016 to be removed. This potential decrease in building square footage may result in a decrease of the required parking spaces, offsetting the required spaces needing replacement. In EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 211 5/5/2026
10 addition, APN 398-101-16 would lose an additional approximately 15 parking spaces that are currently fronting Santa Ana Boulevard. A review of City standards for parking at this location will be conducted to determine whether replacement of this parking is necessary during the preparation of the Community Impact Assessment (CIA). At the Santa Ana Transportation Center approximately 150 parking spaces would be removed. A parking structure has been constructed at the Santa Ana Transportation Center, which is greatly underutilized; it is assumed that this loss of parking can be accommodated by the parking structure. A review of the capacity and utilization of the parking structure will be included in the CIA.

33. Will the project construction encroach on state or federal lands? The proposed project would not involve any encroachment on state or federal lands.

34. Will the project convert any farmland to a different use or impact any farmlands? Through mapping maintained by the Natural Resources Conservation Service/California Department of Conservation, it has been determined that the project area, which is located in an urbanized area (Santa Ana Boulevard), does not meet the definition of farmland as defined in 7 CFR 658. The entire project area is defined as Urban and Built-up Land. Therefore, the provisions of the Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1984 do not apply to this project.

Cultural Resources

35. Is there National Register listed, or potentially eligible historic properties, or archaeological resources within or immediately adjacent to the construction area? (Note: Caltrans PQS answers question #35) To be addressed by Caltrans PQS.

36. Is the project adjacent to, or would it encroach on Tribal land? No Tribal Land has been identified on or adjacent to the proposed project site and no impacts to Tribal Lands are anticipated.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 212 5/5/2026
5 405
5 5
405
55 91
261
73 57
72 22
133
90 133
90 261
72 91
261
57 22
Anaheim
Santa Ana
Irvine
Orange
Costa Mesa
Garden Grove
Fullerton
Tustin
Fountain Valley
Newport Beach
Westminster
Tustin Foothills
Placentia
Villa Park Villa Park
Figure 1
Regional Vicinity Map
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
Source: ESRI StreetMap
North America (2008)
0 0.5 1 2
Miles
San Bernardino
Riverside
Im San Diego
Orange
Los Angeles
Kern
Pacific
Ocean
K:\Irvine\GIS\Projects\AECOM\00452_11\mapdoc\Fig01_Regional_Vicinity.mxd SM (06-13-11) Project Site
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 213 5/5/2026
Project Location
French Park French Park
Logan
Park
BNSF RR and Amtrak P E Railroad
15th
Walnut
Mcclay
Wright
Standard
Spurgeon
Washington
French
Elk
Linwood
Poinsettia
Lyon
Orange
Oakmont
Cypress
Halladay
Oak
Santiago
Main
Parrie
Hardly
14th
Grace
Maple
4th
Breeden
Trinidad
Lincoln
Kilson
Obarr
8th
Mabury
Brown
Dresser
Myrtle
Mortimer
Martha
Greenwood
5th
Penn
Eastside
Porter
11th
Stafford
12th
Terminal
Eastwood
Patricia
2nd
Camile
Court
Hathaway
Dorman
9th
10th
Valencia
Palm
Vance
Minnie
18th
Warren
Cedar
Concord
Custer
Wellington
Fuller
Fruit
6th
Fairmont
19th
Bush
20th
21st
Catalina
Logan
16th
3rd
Santa Fe
Minter
Garfield Hickory
Civic Center
Bishop
Pine
Lacy
Chestnut
Santa Ana
17th
Grand
Mortimer
Main
4th
1st
5th
5 Figure 2
Project Location Map
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
K:\Irvine\GIS\Projects\AECOM\00452_11\mapdoc\Fig02_Project_Location.mxd SM (06-13-11)) Source: ESRI StreetMap
North America (2008)
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 214 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 215 5/5/2026
Print Date: 5/16/2011 9:16:39 AM Page: 21 of 28
CITY FUNDS 55 55 55 55RECREATIONAL TRAILS 103 103 103 103ORA100501 Total 158 158 158 158 ProjectID County Air Basin Model RTP ID Program Route Begin End System Conformity Category Amendment ORA100501 Orange SCAB ORA100501 NCR25 L EXEMPT - 93.126 0 Fund ENG R/W CON Total Prior 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 TotalDescription:THORTON PARK RECREATION TRAIL REFURBISHMENT. INCLUDING REGRADING, REPLACE ASPHALT & CONCRETE, INSTALLATION OF EDGING.

PTC 158 Agency SANTA ANA
CITY FUNDS 75 75 75 75RECREATIONAL TRAILS 550 550 550 550ORA085003 Total 625 625 625 625Fund ENG R/W CON Total Prior 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 Total ProjectID County Air Basin Model RTP ID Program Route Begin End System Conformity Category Amendment Description:Flower Street Bike Trail Gap Closure- Construction of a 10-foot wide by one-half mile long asphalt bicycle trail, including landscaping, irrigation, and trailhead plaza PTC 625 Agency SANTA ANA
ORA085003 Orange SCAB REG0704 NCR26 L EXEMPT - 93.126 1 ORANGE M - TRANSIT 170 170 170 170STP LOCAL - REGIONAL 1,330 1,330 1,330 1,330ORA082610 Total 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 ProjectID County Air Basin Model RTP ID Program Route Begin End System Conformity Category Amendment ORA082610 Orange SCAB 2TR0704 CAN61 L EXEMPT - 93.126 0 Fund ENG R/W CON Total Prior 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 TotalSanta Ana Blvd Grade Separation - Near the Expansion of the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center. (SARTIC) Initial planning and conceptual engineering phase. related to ORA81621Description: PTC 1,671 Agency SANTA ANACITY FUNDS 39 39 39 39RECREATIONAL TRAILS 87 167 254 87 167 254ORA020809 Total 87 206 293 87 206 293 ProjectID County Air Basin Model RTP ID Program Route Begin End System Conformity Category Amendment ORA020809 Orange SCAB REG0704 NCR25 L EXEMPT - 93.126 0 Fund ENG R/W CON Total Prior 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 TotalDescription:SANTA ANA GOLDEN LOOP TRAIL REHABILITATION - REHAB 19,000 LINEAR FEET OF TRAIL PTC 293 Agency SANTA ANA
Orange County
Local Highway
Adopted 2011 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (In 000`s)
Including Amendments 1-7
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 216 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 217 5/5/2026
Visual Impact Assessment Guide – Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project Change to the Visual Environment

1. Will the project result in a noticeable change in the physical characteristics of the existing environment? (Consider all project components and construction impacts - both permanent and temporary, including landform changes, structures, noise barriers, vegetation removal, railing, signage, and contractor activities) High level of change (3) Moderate level of change (2) Low level of change (1)

2. Will the project complement or contrast with the visual character desired by the community? (Evaluate the scale and extent of the project features compared to the surrounding scale of the community. Is the project likely to give an urban appearance to an existing rural or suburban community? Is the change viewed as positive or negative? Research planning documents, or talk with local planners and community representatives to get a rough idea of what type of visual environment local residents envision for their community.)
Highly incompatible (3) Somewhat incompatible (2) Somewhat compatible (1)

3. What types of project features and construction impacts are proposed? Are bridge structures, large excavations, sound barriers, or median planting removal proposed? (Certain project improvements can be of special local interest, causing a heightened level of public concern, and requiring a more focused visual analysis.)
High concern (3) Moderate concern (2) Low concern (1)

4. Will the project changes likely be mitigated by normal means such as landscaping and architectural enhancement or will avoidance measures be necessary to minimize adverse change? (Consider the type of changes caused by the project, i.e., can undesirable views be screened or will desirable views be permanently obscured?)
Project alternative may be needed (3) Extensive mitigation likely (2) Normal mitigation (1)

5. Will this project, when seen collectively with other projects, result in an aggregate adverse change in overall visual quality or character?
(Identification of contributing projects should include any projects (both departmental and local) in the area that have been constructed within the last couple of years and those currently envisioned or planned for future construction. The window of time and the extent of area applicable to possible cumulative impacts should be based on a reasonable anticipation of the viewing public's perception.) Impacts likely in 0-5 years (3) Impacts likely in 6-10 years (2) Cumulative Impacts unlikely (1) Viewer Sensitivity

1. What is the potential that the project proposal may be controversial within the community, or opposed by any organized group?
(This can be researched initially by talking with Departmental and local agency management and staff familiar with the affected community’s sentiments as evidenced by past projects and/or current information. Factor in your own judgment as well.)
High Potential (3) Moderate Potential (2) Low Potential (1)

2. How sensitive are potential viewer-groups likely to be regarding visible changes proposed by the project? (Consider among other factors the number of viewers within the group, probable viewer expectations, activities, viewing duration, and orientation. The expected viewer sensitivity level may be scoped by applying EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 218 5/5/2026
professional judgment, and by soliciting information from other Caltrans staff, local agencies and community representatives familiar with the affected community’s sentiments and demonstrated concerns.) High Sensitivity (3) Moderate Sensitivity (2) Low Sensitivity (1)

3. To what degree does the project appear to be consistent with applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, policies or standards?
(Although the State is often not obligated to adhere to local planning ordinances, these documents are critical in understanding the importance the local communities place on aesthetic issues. The Caltrans Environmental Planning branch may have copies of the planning documents that pertain to the project. If not, this information can be obtained by contacting the local planning department. Many local and state planning documents can be found online at the California Land Use Planning Network).

Incompatible (3) Moderately compatible (2) Largely compatible (1)

4. Are any permits going to be required by outside regulatory agencies (i.e., Federal, State, or local) that will necessitate a particular level of Visual Impact Assessment? (Anticipated permits, as well as specific permit requirements - which are defined by the permitter, may be determined by talking with the project Environmental Planner and Project Engineer. Note: coordinate with the Caltrans representative responsible for obtaining the permit prior to communicating directly with any permitting agency.)
Yes (3) Maybe (2) No (1)

5. Will the Project Development Team or public benefit from a more detailed visual analysis in order to help reach consensus on a course of action?
(Consider the proposed project features, possible environmental impacts, and probable mitigation recommendations.)
Yes (3) Maybe (2) No (1)
Determining the Type of Visual Impact Assessment Required The total score will indicate the general level of Visual Impact Assessment that should be performed for the project. Once the level of recommended assessment is identified, the user should double-check the results by comparing each of the ten question-areas to the total score in order to confirm that the level of document appears sufficient and reasonable in each case.

Score 25-30 – Prior to preparing a VIA, a formal visual scoping study that meets or exceeds FHWA requirements is recommended to alert the Project Development Team to potential highly adverse impacts and to develop new project alternatives to avoid those impacts.

Score 20-24 – A fully developed VIA, that meets or exceeds FHWA requirements, is recommended. This technical study will likely receive extensive public review.

Score 15-19 – An abbreviated VIA would be appropriate in this case. The assessment would describe project features, impacts and mitigation requirements. Visual simulations would be optional.

Score 10-14 – A brief Visual assessment in memo form would likely be sufficient.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 219 5/5/2026
Project Development Procedures Manual 07/01/99 DD-1
etric
Caltrans
Initial Site Assessment (ISA) Checklist
Project Information
District __12__ County _ORA_ Route _____ Post Mile _______ EA _ Fed Proj No. (CML-5956 [188])_ Description The City of Santa Ana, in coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Department), is proposing to grade separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at-grade railroad crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California. The purpose of the proposed project is to improve safety, as it will remove the existing at-grade conflict between vehicular traffic and rail traffic. In addition, the proposed project would reduce the congestion and inconvenience caused by this existing at-grade facility.

Is the project on the HW Study Minimal-Risk Projects List (HW1)? No Project Manager Jason Gabriel phone # (714) 647-5400
Project Screening
Attach the project location map to this checklist to show location of all known and/or potential HW sites identified.

1. Project Features: New R/W? Yes Excavation? _Yes_ Railroad Involvement? Yes Structure demolition/modification? Yes Subsurface utility relocation? Yes

2. Project Setting Heavily developed. Adjoining properties include commercial/industrial sites, County maintenance facilities, single- and multi-family dwellings, and Metrolink tracks.

Rural or Urban Urban
Current land uses Roadway, railroad, commercial/industrial Adjacent land uses Commercial/industrial, single- and multi-family dwellings, Metrolink tracks (industrial, light industry, commercial, agricultural, residential, etc.)

3. Check federal, State, and local environmental and health regulatory agency records as necessary, to see if any known hazardous waste site is in or near the project area. If a known site is identified, show its location on the attached map and attach additional sheets, as needed, to provide pertinent information for the proposed project.

4. Conduct Field Inspection. Date 06/13/2011 Use the attached map to locate potential or known HW sites.

STORAGE STRUCTURES / PIPELINES:

Underground tanks Yes Surface tanks Yes
Sumps None observed Ponds None observed
Drums None observed Basins None observed
Transformers Yes Landfill None observed
Other Several industrial sites noted, these include the County Maintenance Yard located at 1102 Fruit Street, which has gas pumps and above ground tanks on site, and a hazardous materials placard was identified on the Orange County Public Works property located 1143 Fruit Street.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 220 5/5/2026
Appendixes
Project Development Forms and Letters plus Policy and Procedures Documents 07/10/99 DD-2 Project Development Procedures Manual
Initial Site Assessment (ISA) Checklist
(continued)
CONTAMINATION: (spills, leaks, illegal dumping, etc.)
Surface staining Typical pavement stains Oil sheen None observed Odors None observed Vegetation damage None observed
Other None
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: (asbestos, lead, etc.)
Buildings Potential Spray-on fireproofing n/a
Pipe wrap n/a Friable tile n/a
Acoustical plaster n/a Serpentine n/a
Paint Potential Other

5. Additional record search, as necessary, of subsequent land uses that could have resulted in a hazardous waste site. Use the attached map to show the location of potential hazardous waste sites.

6. Other comments and/or observations: A review of the California Department of Toxic Substances’ EnviroStor database revealed that the nearest site that utilizes hazardous waste and substances onsite is the Orange County Register (located at 625 N. Grand Avenue). This site is located approximately 800 feet south of the east end of the project site.

ISA Determination
Does the project have potential hazardous waste involvement? _Yes_ If there is known or potential hazardous waste involvement, is additional ISA work needed before task orders can be prepared for the Investigation? ___Yes___ If "YES," explain; then give an estimate of additional time required:

An Initial Site Assessment will be prepared for the proposed project. It is anticipated to be completed in four months.

A brief memo should be prepared to transmit the ISA conclusions to the Project Manager and Project Engineer.

ISA Conducted by Brian Calvert Date June 16, 2011
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 221 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Blvd. Grade Separation

PROJECT REPORT EQUIVALENT K
Attachment K:

Categorical Exemption/Categorical Exclusion
Determination Form
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 222 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 223 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 224 5/5/2026
California Home Tuesday, July 22, 2014
OPR Home > CEQAnet Home > CEQAnet Query > Search Results > Document Description Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
SCH Number: 2014068326
Document Type: NOE - Notice of Exemption
Project Lead Agency: Santa Ana, City of
Project Description
Grade separation of the existing Santa Ana Blvd/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at-grade railroad crossing. The purpose is to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; Improve emergency response times; and reduce congestion along Santa Ana Blvd.

Contact Information
Primary Contact:

Jason Gabriel
City of Santa Ana
714-647-5664
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Project Location
County: Orange
City: Santa Ana
Region:

Cross Streets:

Latitude/Longitude:

Parcel No:

Township:

Range:

Section:

Base:

Other Location Info:

Exempt Status
Ministerial
Declared Emergency
Emergency Project
Categorical Exemption
Statutory Exemption
Type, Section or Code Number S:21080.13;15282
Reasons for Exemption
CA Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Article 18, §15282(g) statutorily exempts any railroad grade separation project which eliminates an existing grade crossing as set forth in Section 21080.13 of the CA Public Resources Code. Section 21080.13 further states that CEQA shall not apply to any railroad grade separation project which eliminates an existing grade crossing.

Date Received: 6/23/2014
CEQAnet HOME | NEW SEARCH
CEQAnet - Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Page 1 of 1 http://www.ceqanet.ca.gov/NOEdescription.asp?DocPK=682127 7/22/2014 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 225 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Blvd. Grade Separation

PROJECT REPORT EQUIVALENT L
Attachment L:

Environmental Commitment Record
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 226 5/5/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT RECORD
Section 1. Section 2.

RECORDING DATES PROJECT DETAILS
7/8/2014 Dist-County-Route 12-ORA-Santa Ana
7/8/2014 EA / E-FIS STPL 5063 (136)
Post Mile (PM) N/A
Document Type NEPA CE/23USC327
PROJECT PHASE ASSIGNED STAFF Name Phone Number Signature PSR

PA&ED (DRAFT PR/ED)

PA&ED (FINAL PR/ED) X
35% PS&E
65% PS&E
95% PS&E

ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION

PRECONSTRUCTION

CONSTRUCTION

POST CONSTRUCTION
Section 6.

CONSTRUCTION KICKOFF SIGNATURE:

Resident Engineer:______________________________________________ Date:__________________ Environmental Planner:___________________________________________ Date:__________________ Section 7.

NO. DESCRIPTION OF COMMITMENT NSSP

RESPONSIBLE

PARTY/MONITOR TIMING/PHASE
TASK COMPLETED (Initial and
Date)
COMMITMENT SOURCE (Document
source & date)
COMMENTS (Include location within limits of
project if needed)
1 WQ-1: The project shall comply with the provisions of the NPDES General Permit, Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activities (Order Number 2009-0009-DWQ, NPDES Number CAS000002) and any subsequent permit in effect at the time of construction.

Prior to construction, Permit Registration Documents (PRDs), which includes permit application fee, a Notice of Intent (NOI), a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and other compliance related documents required by the permit, shall be mailed to the State Water Quality Control Board.

The project SWPPP shall be prepared by a Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) or a Qualified SWPPP Developers (QSD) to address all construction related activities, equipment, and materials that have the potential to impact the water quality. The SWPPP shall identify the sources of pollutants that may affect the quality of storm water and include construction site BMPs to control pollutants and sediments. The SWPPP shall include erosion control, sediment control, wind erosion control, tracking control, and all other applicable non-stormwater management and material management BMPs. All construction site BMPs shall follow the latest edition of the CASQA Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook for Construction. In addition, the project water quality risk level shall be identified. Rain Event Action Plan, Field Monitoring, and Reporting Guidance shall be prepared for effluent monitoring and receiving water monitoring. The General Permit requires that permittees prepare, certify, and electronically submit an Annual Report no later than September 1st of each year. Reporting requirements are identified in Section XVI of the General Permit.

YES
City of Santa Ana (during
final design)/Resident
Engineer and Contractor
(during construction)
Design / Construction
______________
______________
Water Quality Memorandum
October 2012
The project proposes to o grade separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at-grade railroad crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California. The purpose of the proposed project is to improve safety, as it will remove the existing at-grade conflict between pedestrian, vehicular traffic, and rail traffic. In addition, the proposed project would reduce the congestion and inconvenience caused by this existing at-grade facility. As part of the grade separation the proposed project includes: a pedestrian bridge, minor improvements to the Santa Ana Boulevard/Santiago Street intersection; terminating Logan Street north of Santa Ana Boulevard by constructing a cul-de-sac; and improvements to Fuller Street, both north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard.

Section 3.

Originating date:

Current date:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

ICF/Brian Calvert
Section 4. Section 5.

ENVIRONMENTAL GENERALIST:

PROJECT MANAGER:

PROJECT ENGINEER
RESIDENT ENGINEER:

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT
I hearby acknowledge that as of the Construction Kickoff Meeting, I have read, fully understand and will implement the following commitment measures during construction.

PROJECT PHASE

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
(949) 724-2252
(714) 567-2527
(949) 333-6600
Caltrans/Brian Liu (949) 724-2014
Santa Ana/Jason Gabriel
AECOM/Janson Ting
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 227 5/5/2026
2 WQ-2: Treatment BMPs shall be implemented to the maximum extent practicable (MEP), consistent with the requirements of the Orange County MS4 Permit, Order 8-009-0030 (amended by Order R8-2010- 0062, NPDES No. CAS 618030). Biofiltration systems or catch basin filter inserts are proposed as the potential treatment BMPs for the ject.

Detailed design of the BMP and the location will be determined in the final engineering phase. Removal of existing vegetation will be minimized to the greatest extent sible and any mature trees to be saved would be identified on final plans. The final siting and design of treatment BMPs will be designed in compliance with the OC Model Water Qualiy Management Plan (WQMP) (2010), the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) and the 2003 OC Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP)
YES
City of Santa Ana (during
final design)/Resident
Engineer and Contractor
(during construction)
Design / Construction
______________
______________
Water Quality Memorandum
October 2012
3 WQ-3: Design pollution prevention BMPs shall be implemented in accordance with Green Streets Municipal Handbook (EPA-833-F-08-009; 2008), such as preservation of existing vegetation, slope/surface protection systems (permanent soil stabilization), concentrated flow conveyance systems such as ditches, berms, dikes, and swales, overside drains, flared end sections, and outlet protection/velocity dissipation devices.

YES
City of Santa Ana (during
final design)/Resident
Engineer and Contractor
(during construction)
Design / Construction Water Quality Memorandum
October 2012
4 BIO-1: Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey. If project-related site disturbances are scheduled to occur during the core nesting period (February 15 through September 1), a qualified biologist will perform preconstruction nesting bird surveys. The survey will be completed within seven days prior to any project-related disturbances. If native birds are nesting on or within 100 feet (as accessible) of the limits of disturbance (LOD), a 100-foot buffer (or an alternative width, as determined by a qualified ornithologist) should be flagged around the nest, and no projectrelated construction activities within the buffer will occur until it has been determined that all young have fledged or the nest is no longer active.

NO Resident Engineer and
Contractor
Survey to be performed within 7 days
prior to any ground disturbance.

Measure to be implemented if nesting
birds are found.

Natural Environment Study
January 2012
5 BIO-2: Preconstruction Nesting Raptor Survey. If project-related site disturbances are scheduled to occur during the core nesting period (February 15 through September 1), a qualified biologist will perform preconstruction nesting raptor surveys. The survey will be completed within seven days prior to any project-related disturbances. If raptors are nesting on or within 500 feet (as accessible) of the LOD, a 500-foot buffer (or an alternative width, as determined by a qualified ornithologist) should be flagged around the nest, and no project-related construction activities within the buffer will occur until it has been determined that all young have fledged or the nest is no longer active.

NO Resident Engineer and
Contractor
Survey to be performed within 7 days
prior to any ground disturbance.

Measure to be implemented if nesting
raptors are found.
______________
______________
Natural Environment Study
January 2012
6 BIO-3: Preconstruction Bat Survey. To prevent impacts on daytime bat roosts and maternity roosts, a qualified biologist will be retained to conduct bat and bat roosting site surveys prior to commencement of building demolition or mature tree removal activities. This preconstruction survey will be conducted at any abandoned buildings, as well as any mature tree proposed for removal and within 100 feet of the LOD. If no roosting sites or bats are found, a report confirming their absence will be sent to the California Department Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and no further mitigation will be required.

If the pre-construction survey finds bats to be roosting, and building demolition/mature tree removal is scheduled to occur between October 1 and March 30 (outside of the maternity season of April 1st through September 30), the bats shall be evicted by the following methods.

Eviction of bats shall be conducted using bat exclusion techniques, developed by Bat Conservation International (BCI) and in consultation with CDFW. These techniques allow the bats to exit the roosting site but prevent re-entry to the site. This process will include, but not be limited to, the installation of one-way exclusion devices on buildings and a twostep cutting process for trees. Sealing buildings at the time of abandonment may prevent the need for the exclusion process. Where exclusionary devices would be installed on buildings, the devices shall remain in place for seven days, and then the exclusion points and any other potential entrances shall be sealed. A visual inspection of each building would be required prior to demolition to verify that all bats have been successfully excluded. Where the two-step cutting process would be applicable for tree roosts, surrounding branches, not housing bats, would be removed during step one. This would alter the condition of the roost tree, causing bats to abandon the roost. The tree can then be fully removed, as step two. A visual inspection of the roost tree would be required prior to removal to verify that all bats have been successfully excluded. This work shall be completed by a bat exclusion professional.

If the pre-construction survey finds bats to be roosting and building demolition/mature tree removal is scheduled to occur during the NO Resident Engineer and
Contractor
Survey to be performed prior to start
of building demolition or mature tree
removal. Measure to be implemented
if roosting sites or bats are found.
______________
______________
Natural Environment Study
January 2012
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 228 5/5/2026
7 BIO-4: Standard Best Management Practices. Applicable Best Management Practices shall be implemented. These include but are not limited to: • Water pollution and erosion control plans shall be developed and implemented in accordance with Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requirements. • Equipment storage, fueling, and staging areas shall be located at sites with minimal risks of direct drainage into surface waters. Project related spills of hazardous materials shall be reported to appropriate entities, including but not limited to the City and/or RWQCB, and shall be cleaned up immediately and contaminated soils removed to approved disposal areas. • Exotic pecies removed during construction will be properly handled to prevent sprouting or regrowth. • Trucks with loads carrying vegetation will be covered, and vegetation materials removed from the site will be disposed of in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. • Construction equipment will be cleaned of mud or other debris
that may contain invasive plants and/or seeds and inspected to reduce the potential of spreading noxious weeds before mobilizing to the site and before leaving the site uring the course of construction. • To avoid attracting wildlife to the project site, the construction shall be kept as clean of debris as possible. All food related trash items shall be enclosed in sealed containers and regularly removed from the site(s).

YES Resident Engineer and
Contractor During Construction
______________
______________
Natural Environment Study
January 2012
8 CR-1: It is the Department’s policy to avoid cultural resources whenever possible. Further investigations may be needed if unanticipated cultural sites are encountered that cannot be avoided by the project. If cultural materials are discovered during construction, all earth-moving activity within and around the immediate discovery area will be diverted until a qualified archaeologist can assess the nature and significance of the find.

If changes are made to the proposed project, an additional archaeological survey would be required to include areas not previously surveyed.

YES Resident Engineer and
Contractor
During all ground-disturbing and
construction activities
______________
______________
Historic Property Survey Report
Decmeber 2011
9 N-1: Comply with the construction hours specified in the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code, Noise Section 18-314. NO Resident Engineer and Contractor
During any grading and construction
activities
______________
______________
Noise Study Report
January 2013
10 N-2: Noise control will conform to the provisions in Section 14-8.02 and Standard Special Provision S5-310. The noise level from the contractor’s operations between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. will not exceed 86 dBA L eq (h) at a distance of 50 feet. This requirement in no way relieves the contractor from responsibility for complying with local ordinances regulating noise levels. The contractor should use an alternative warning method instead of a sound signal unless required by safety laws. In addition, the contractor will equip all internal combustion engines with the manufacturer-recommended mufflers and will not operate any internal combustion engine on the job site without the appropriate muffler.

YES Resident Engineer and
Contractor
During any grading and construction
activities
______________
______________
Noise Study Report
January 2013
11 N-3: The sound barriers that are determined to be reasonable and feasible shall be coordinated with the affected property owners. All benefited residents and property owners will be notified should a change in placement or removal of any soundwall occur during the design phase.

Additionally, all residents/property owners will be notified of final soundwall locations prior to 100% PS&E.

NO City of Santa Ana Design
______________
______________
Noise Study Report
January 2013
12 N-4: The contractor will implement appropriate additional noise mitigation measures, including changing the location of stationary construction equipment, turning off idling equipment, rescheduling construction activity, notifying adjacent residents in advance of construction work, and installing acoustic barriers around stationary construction noise sources.

NO Resident Engineer and
Contractor
During any grading and construction
activities
______________
______________
Noise Study Report
January 2013
13 AQ-1: The project would conform to Caltrans’ construction requirements, as specified in the Caltrans’ Standard Specifications, Section 7-1.01F (Air Pollution Control): “The Contractor shall comply with all air pollution control ordinances and statutes which apply to any work performed pursuant to the contract, including any air pollution control rules, regulations, ordinances and statutes, specified in Section 11017 of the Government Code.

NO Resident Engineer and
Contractor
During any grading and construction
activities
______________
______________
Air Quality Assessment
June 2012
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 229 5/5/2026
14 AQ-2: The proposed project, although not a large operation under the Rule’s definition would be required to implement measures for each source of PM10 emissions, as specified in SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) Implementation Handbook
No Resident Engineer and
Contractor
During any grading and construction
activities
______________
______________
Air Quality Assessment
June 2012
15 RELOC-1: In accordance with the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Property Acquisition Act of 1970 as amended (42 USC Secs. 4601- 4655), provide compensation to eligible recipients for property acquisitions
No City of Santa Ana Design
______________
______________
Relocation Impacts Memorandum
July 2012
16 UT-1: The City will coordinate all utility relocation work with the affected utility companies to ensure minimum disruption to customers in the service areas during
construction.

No
City of Santa Ana,
Resident Engineer, and
Contractor
Design / Prior to construction
______________
______________
Community Impact Assessment
March 2014
17 HAZ-1: A Phase II Environmental Site Assessment is recommended during the final design phase for parts of the study area as follows: Parcel A-1 (1024 Fuller): current the auto repair shop: sampling if indicated (interior inspection required); Parcel A-2 (1022 Fuller): former machine shop with degreaser, auto wrecking compant and auto repair shop.

Parcel A-4 (1020 Fuller): former paint manufacturer, former auto body shop, former metals receovery facility; Parcel A-5 (1016 Fuller): former machine shop; Parcel A-6 (1012 Fuller): former paint spray booth, former paint manufacturer (Jasco Chemical). Parcel A-7 (1008 Fuller): Jasco Chemical. The Phase II ESA would include soil sampling for petroleum hydrocarbons, volatile organic compouns, heavy metals and/or those chemicals formerly stored on site by Jasco Chemical, as appropriate for each individual location.

NO City of Santa Ana Design
______________
______________
Initial Site Assessment October
2012
18 HAZ-2: Perform comprehensive survey for asbestos-containing materials, lead-based paoint, PCBs and mercury switches during the final design phase at the buildings proposed for acquisition.

NO City of Santa Ana (during
final design) Design
______________
______________
Initial Site Assessment October
2012
19 HAZ-3: Subsurface investigations are deemed to be unnecessary on Temporary Construction Easement parcels. However, in view of the former usage of Parcel T-9 for battery manufacturing, and the current presence of an automotive junkyard on the site, soil sampling for lead, cadmium and petroleum hydrocarbons should performed if any ground disturbance is contemplated in order to ensure worker and public safety during construction.

NO City of Santa Ana (during
final design) Design
______________
______________
Initial Site Assessment October
2012
20 HAZ-4: The hazardous waste storage area and possible waste oil tank at J&H Drilling should be inspected for possible release of waste oil or other environmental concerns.

NO City of Santa Ana (during
final design) Design
______________
______________
Initial Site Assessment October
2012
21 HAZ-5: Removal of the three closed-in-place USTs at the former Jasco Chemical plant should be considered. NO City of Santa Ana (during final design) Design
______________
______________
Initial Site Assessment October
2012
22 HAZ-6: Inspection and sampling for asbestos, lead-based paint, PCBs and mercury switches in the buildings in the acquisition area. NO City of Santa Ana (during final design) Design ______________ Initial Site Assessment October 2012 23 TRF-1: Prepare and implement a Traffic Management Plan (TMP). The TMP will be provided to emergency service providers and school officials with construction plans prior to commencement of construction. The following shall be included in the TMP or carried out in coordination with the TMP: •Implement a construction management program that maintains access to and from the project area community through signage, detours, flagmen, etc. • Coordinate with emergency services providers to ensure that alternative response routes to and from the project area community are in place during construction of the proposed project. • Provide access to all fire hydrants along all access routes and provide and maintain fire department vehicle access roads along project site. • Consult with local school officials to identify safe vehicular routes and pedestrian crossing for students traveling to and from schools in the project area community during construction of the proposed project. • Coordinate with the utility providers for relocation of utility lines and inform the utility users in advance about the date and timings of service disruptions. • Prepare temporary detour plans during the Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) phase. • Provide notification to be sent to emergency service providers,
local school officials, and any residents that may be
substantially affected by any street closures (including partial and/or full closures) or traffic diversions at least two weeks in advance of the planned closure or diversion.

YES
City of Santa Ana,
Resident Engineer, and
Contractor
Prior to any grading or construction
activities / during any grading or
construction (implement)
______________
______________
Community Impact Assessment
March 2014
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 230 5/5/2026
24 VIS-1: The project will be implemented in adherence to the guidance found in Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual and other Caltrans memoranda regarding landscape design policy, which mandates consideration of the local design context in which the work is proposed and obtaining the input of local governmental agencies. In addition, the project will be designed and implemented with the concurrence of the District Landscape Architect.

YES
City of Santa Ana (during
final design) / Resident
Engineer and Contractor
(during construction)
Incorporate recommendations during
final design and implement during
construction
______________
______________
Visual Impact Assessment
February 2014
Section 8.

PERMITS
Agency Issue Date Type Expiration Date Comments
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 231 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Blvd. Grade Separation

PROJECT REPORT EQUIVALENT M
Attachment M:

Project Schedule
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 232 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Blvd. Grade Separation

PROJECT REPORT EQUIVALENT N
Attachment N:

Geotechnical Technical Memorandum
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 233 5/5/2026
17800 Newhope Street, Suite B, Fountain Valley, California 92708. Tel: (714) 751-3826, Fax: (714) 751-3928 Earth Mechanics, Inc.

Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
EMI PROJECT NO: 11-123
DATE: September 13, 2011
PREPARED FOR: Mohan Char, Ph.D., P.E. / AECOM
PREPARED BY: Ranjan Gunaranjan and Lino Cheang / Earth Mechanics, Inc. (EMI) SUBJECT: Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report (SPGR)
____________________________________________________________________________ Introduction
This memorandum has been prepared to provide the necessary geotechnical information to assist the structural designers in the type selection process for the Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation (GS) at Santa Ana Boulevard and Metrolink Railroad intersection. The content of this memorandum follows Caltrans Foundation Report Preparation for Bridge Foundations (Caltrans, 2009). It includes preliminary geotechnical, seismic, and foundation recommendations for the subject GS and the adjoining retaining walls. The recommendations provided in this memorandum are based on subsurface information contained on the as-built Log-of-Test-Borings (LOTB) of three nearby structures: Grand Avenue Undercrossing (Bridge No. 55-671L), Lincoln Avenue Underpass (Bridge No. 55-672), and Lincoln Avenue Overcrossing (Bridge No. 55-675).

These nearby bridges are located less than 0.3 mile from the proposed GS. An additional geotechnical investigation will need to be performed during the PS&E phase; therefore, the following recommendations may change when additional information becomes available.

Project Description
As presented in the preliminary plan provided by the designers, the existing Santa Ana Boulevard, which intersects at-grade with the existing Metrolink railroad tracks, will be lowered under the railroad tracks to have a minimum vertical clearance of about 16.5 feet. The horizontal alignment of Santa Ana Boulevard will also be shifted about 30 feet to the south due to the presence of a utility corridor. Retaining walls will be constructed on the north side of the Santa Ana Boulevard in-line with the bridge abutment (Abutment 5). A portion of the retaining wall located at the depressed roadway is proposed to be a Type SW retaining wall and the remaining portion is proposed to be Caltrans Standard Type 1 retaining wall. Based on the information provided by the structural designers, Type SW retaining wall is a U-shape cantilever wall that will support the sidewalk in the middle of the “U”.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 234 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
September 13, 2011

Earth Mechanics, Inc.

Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering
General Subsurface Conditions
According to the attached As-Built LOTB sheets for the nearby structures, a total of twelve auger borings were drilled between March and May, 1989. The deepest boring was advanced to about elevation +50 feet. Existing grade at the borehole locations at the time of the investigation ranged between elevations +130 feet and +168 feet. The existing grade at the subject site is about elevation +145 feet.

At the nearby bridge site, the surficial material is embankment fill consisting predominantly of medium dense to dense silty sand with few interbedded very stiff to hard sandy silt. Thickness of this embankment fill varies from 10 to 25 feet. The embankment fill is underlain by about 40 feet of native deposits composed predominantly of loose to very dense silty sand and medium stiff to hard sandy silt with occasional silty clay and clayey silt interbeds. Below about elevation +105 feet, the stratigraphy included very dense silty sand, sand with gravel and cobbles, sandy gravel, and clayey gravel with some interbedded loose to medium dense silty sand and sand layers down to about elevation +80 feet. Very dense silty sand, sand with gravel and cobbles, sandy gravel, and clayey gravel layers were encountered below about elevation +80 feet down to the depth explored.

Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings that were drilled down to the deepest elevation of about +50 feet.

Preliminary Seismic Recommendations
It is our understanding that the Santa Ana Boulevard GS will be constructed using the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA) guidelines (AREMA, 2009).

We performed a site-specific probabilistic ground motion analysis using FRISKSP (Blake, 2004 & 2000) computer program for the bridge site. The probabilistic analysis was performed using four attenuation equations published by Abrahamson and Silva (1997), Boore, et al. (1997), Campbell (1997), and Sadigh et al. (1997). These peak horizontal ground acceleration (PGA) values were obtained by averaging the results of the above-referenced attenuation equations and are provided in Table 1.

Table 1. Seismic Design Parameters
Ground Motion Level
(Frequency) Return Period PGA (g)
Site
Coefficient, S
1 (occasional) 100 Years 0.214
2 (rare) 500 Years 0.351 1.5
3 (very rare) 2,400 Years 0.524
The structural engineer can use the data provided in Table 1 to develop the site-specific response spectrum following the procedure outlined in Section 1.4 of Chapter 9 of AREMA (2009).

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 235 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
September 13, 2011

Earth Mechanics, Inc.

Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering
Liquefaction Potential and Seismic Settlement Evaluation The subject site is anticipated to have a low liquefaction potential due to the absence of groundwater. Since the liquefaction potential at the bridge site is anticipated to be low, seismic settlement of onsite soils is also anticipated to be low. A more detailed liquefaction assessment will be conducted during the PS&E phase using site-specific soil boring data.

Scour Evaluation
The proposed structure does not cross a channel that conveys water; therefore, scour potential is not anticipated to be a design issue.

Corrosion Evaluation
There is no corrosion test result included with the as-built plans. Site-specific soil corrosivity will be investigated during the PS&E phase in accordance with Caltrans requirements.

Foundation Data of Nearby Bridges
The proposed GS is a new structure and therefore, no as-built foundation data specific to this structure is available. However, the as-built plans for the nearby three structures (Bridge Numbers 55-671L, 55-672, and 55-675) that are located less than 0.3 mile from the proposed railroad bridge were reviewed as part of this project. All of these structures are supported on driven concrete piles with a service demand of 45, 70, or 100 tons.

Preliminary Bridge Foundation Recommendations
Bridge Configuration: The preliminary plan provided by the structural engineers indicates that the Santa Ana Boulevard GS is a four-span steel plate girder bridge with a total bridge length of about 247 feet and a total bridge width of about 40 feet.

Foundation Type: Due to the presence of weak near-surface site soils, deep foundation is recommended for the proposed structure. The preliminary plans provided by the structural engineers show that large-diameter Cast-In-Drilled-Hole (CIDH) pile extensions will be used at the bents and driven steel HP piles will be used at the abutments.

Based on the information provided by the structural designers, the abutments are supported by 100-ton steel HP piles (HP 14x89). For each 6-foot diameter CIDH pile, a service load of 960 kips is provided by the structural designers. Based on these axial demands, the preliminary pile lengths are 70 feet and 55 feet at the abutments and the bents, respectively, for cost estimating purposes.

As mentioned earlier, as-built foundation type for the three nearby Caltrans bridges is driven precast-prestressed concrete (PCC) piles. We will evaluate the feasibility of using driven PCC piles instead of the HP-piles during the PS&E phase when site-specific soil boring data become available.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 236 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
September 13, 2011

Earth Mechanics, Inc.

Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering
Preliminary Retaining Wall Recommendations
Earth retaining structures are proposed for the Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project.

The retaining walls consist of Caltrans Standard Type 1 cantilevered retaining wall and Type SW cantilevered retaining wall.

Lateral Earth Pressure: A static active lateral earth pressure of 36 psf per foot of depth is recommended for a free draining, level and compacted backfill. Materials placed behind the retaining wall should be Caltrans Structure Backfill.

If applicable, a uniform lateral pressure due to vehicular traffic loading, equivalent to a vertical pressure produced by at least 2 feet of earth with a soil unit weight of 120 lb/ft3 , should be added
to the above lateral earth pressure. Using an active earth pressure of 0.3, the recommended uniform lateral earth pressure due to traffic loading is 72 psf.

In addition to the above loadings, the two railroad tracks will induce additional surcharge on the adjacent retaining wall located within the horizontal zone of influence. The uniform lateral earth pressure due to railroad surcharge and the extent of horizontal zone of influence will be determined during the PS&E phase using additional project information.

Lateral Resistance: Resistance to lateral loads may be developed by a combination of friction acting at the base of the wall and passive earth pressure. A maximum passive equivalent fluid pressure of 370 psf per foot and a frictional coefficient of 0.4 between the soil-concrete interface can be used for preliminary design. We recommend 100% of the base friction for static loading.

For seismic loading, we recommend combining 100% of the passive resistance and 100% of the base friction.

Shallow Foundation Design: Using a maximum overexcavation depth (below the footing bottom) of three feet or less and some assumed footing bottom elevations, our calculations show that the allowable bearing capacity is about 3 kips per square foot (ksf). Using the 2006 Caltrans Standard Plan Sheets for Type-1 walls, this implies that Type-1 wall with a height of 12 feet or less can be supported on a spread footing. For Type-1 wall heights greater than 12 feet and TypeSW walls with bearing pressures greater than 3 ksf, we recommend using deep foundations.

Foundation type for the retaining walls will be re-visited when site specific soil boring data become available during the PS&E phase.

The horizontal limits of the overexcavation should begin one foot from each edge of the footing bottom and extending downward at a 45-degree imaginary plane until the plane intersects the overexcavation depth. Prior to backfilling, the excavation bottom should be proof-rolled and after that the excavation bottom should be inspected by a qualified geotechnical engineer or technician to confirm the presence of an unyielding and competent surface. Onsite soils may or may not be suitable for use as backfill; if not, Caltrans Structure Backfill is recommended.

Backfill should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 95% of maximum density as determined by Caltrans Test Method 216.

Minimum footing embedment and offset (from a slope face) for retaining wall should be based on Section 4.4.5.1 of Caltrans Bridge Design Specifications (Caltrans, 2003).

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 237 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
September 13, 2011

Earth Mechanics, Inc.

Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering
Deep Foundation Design: To facilitate fabrication and cost estimate, we recommend using the same pile type as the bridge abutment. However, the axial pile demand should be 45 tons for retaining wall and the corresponding HP pile section is HP 10x42. Using a 45-ton service demand, a preliminary pile length of 50 feet is recommended.

Construction Considerations
Groundwater was not encountered in any of the as-built borings down to about elevation +50 feet. Therefore, groundwater is not anticipated to be encountered during pile construction and footing construction at the supports and walls. However, groundwater level can fluctuate due to seasonal rainfall amount, local irrigation and groundwater recharge program, and other manmade conditions. If groundwater is encountered during footing construction, it should be controlled in accordance with Section 19-3.03D of the Caltrans Standard Specifications (Caltrans, 2010). If groundwater is encountered during CIDH pile construction, contractor should be prepared to use a “wet” method of construction for the CIDH piles. As a standard Caltrans practice for “wet” construction, PVC tubings should be installed within the reinforcement cage for gamma-ray testing.

Based on the As-Built LOTB sheets of the nearby structures, the onsite soils are generally loose to very dense coarse grained materials and these materials are susceptible to caving. If caving occurs, a temporary casing can be used. The casing should have an inside diameter larger than or equal to the pile diameter and should be placed tight in the hole. Vibratory hammers or oversized drilling are not allowed for casing installation. In the event that any boring becomes bell-shaped and cannot be advanced due to severe caving, all loose material should be removed from the bottom of the boring and the caved region filled with a low strength sand-cement slurry. Drilling may continue when the slurry has reached its initial set.

Based on the As-Built LOTB sheets of the nearby structures, gravel and cobbles were recovered during drilling operations in multiple borings and are expected to be encountered during CIDH pile construction. While there could be a trace amount of cobbles between 6 inches and 1 foot diameter, the largest rocks of significance that will be encountered would likely be small cobbles, in the 3- to 6-inch diameter range. While the oversized material will likely create difficult drilling conditions, large-diameter augers typically have flights with wide spacing and a shallow pitch allowing rock pieces, cobbles and boulders to be extracted from the drilled hole.

Rock augers and clean-out buckets can also be used to extract oversized material where a high concentration of gravel and cobbles are encountered.

References
Abrahamson, N. A., and Silva, W., 1997, “Empirical Response Spectral Attenuation Relations for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes,” Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 68, No. 1, January/February.

AREMA, 2009, “Manual for Railway Engineering,” American Railway Engineering Association, Chapters 8, 9, 15.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 238 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
September 13, 2011

Earth Mechanics, Inc.

Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering
Blake, Thomas F., 2004, New 2002 Fault Model Files: New Fault-Data Files for Use with EQFAULT and FRISKSP Derived from CGS Data, September.

Blake, Thomas F., 2000, “FRISKSP User’s Manual - 4.00 Update, Documentation,” April.

Boore, David M., William B. Joyner, and Thomas E. Fumal, 1997, “Equations for Estimating Horizontal Response Spectra and Peak Acceleration from Western North American Earthquakes: A Summary of Recent Work,” Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 128-153, January/February.

Caltrans, 2010, Standard Specifications.

Caltrans, 2009, Guideline for Structures Foundation Reports, Version 2.0, Updated, December.

Caltrans, 2006, Standard Plans
Caltrans, 2003, BDS, Section 4, November.

Campbell, K. W., 1997, “Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudoabsolute acceleration response spectra,” Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp.154-179.

Sadigh, K., Chang K.-Y., Egan, J.A., Makdisi, F., and Youngs, R.R., 1997, “Attenuation Relationships for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Based on California Strong Motion Data,” Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 68, No. 1, January/February.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 239 5/5/2026
ATTACHMENT 1
As-Built LOTB sheets of the nearby
Structures (Grand Avenue Undercrossing (Bridge No. 55-671L), Lincoln Avenue Underpass (Bridge No. 55-672),
and Lincoln Avenue Overcrossing (Bridge No. 55-675),

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 240 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 241 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 242 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 243 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 244 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 245 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 246 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 247 5/5/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

ATTACHMENT M
CEQA DETERMINATION – 2025
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 248 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 249 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 250 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 251 5/5/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

ATTACHMENT N
NEPA CLEARANCE & TECHNICAL STUDIES – 2014
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 252 5/5/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
ATTACHMENT N1

NEPA CLEARANCE
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 253 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 254 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 255 5/5/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
ATTACHMENT N2

TRAFFIC/CIRCULATION STUDY
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 256 5/5/2026

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD

GRADE SEPARATION

PROJECT
Traffic/Circulation Study
Final
AECOM Project No: 60196303
Prepared For:

City of Santa Ana
May 18, 2012
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 257 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study
Final
AECOM Project No: 60196303
May 18, 2012
Prepared For:

City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Prepared By:
999 W. Town & Country Road
Orange, CA 92868
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 258 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012
Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1

1.1 Project Description ................................................................................... 1

1.2 Study Area ............................................................................................... 4

1.3 Study Periods ........................................................................................... 4

2.0 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ................................................................ 6

2.1 Intersection Capacity Analysis .................................................................. 6

2.2 Standard of Significance .......................................................................... 7

3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................... 8

3.1 Existing Roadway System ........................................................................ 8

3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes ........................................................................... 9

3.3 Existing Intersection LOS ......................................................................... 9

3.4 Existing Transit Facilities ........................................................................ 11

3.4.1 Existing Bus Stops .................................................................. 12

3.5 Existing Pedestrian Facilities .................................................................. 13

3.6 Existing Bicycle Facilities ....................................................................... 13

3.7 Existing Santa Ana Boulevard/OCTA Metrolink At-Grade Crossing ........ 13

3.7.1 Rail at-grade crossing impact criteria....................................... 14

4.0 OPENING YEAR (2016) CONDITIONS ............................................... 16

4.1 Opening Year (2016) Traffic Volumes .................................................... 16

4.1.1 Background Growth ................................................................. 16

4.1.2 Cumulative Projects ................................................................ 16

4.2 Opening Year (2016) Intersection LOS .................................................. 19

5.0 FUTURE YEAR (2035) CONDITIONS ................................................. 20

5.1 Future Year (2035) Traffic Volumes ....................................................... 20

5.2 Future Year (2035) Geometric Assumptions .......................................... 21

5.3 Future Year (2035) Intersection LOS ...................................................... 23

6.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ........................................... 24

6.1 Traffic Diversion Due to Termination of Logan Street North of Santa Ana Boulevard ........................................................................................................ 24

7.0 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS ......................................... 25

7.1 Existing Plus Project Levels of Service ................................................... 25

8.0 OPENING YEAR PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS ................................ 27

8.1 Opening Year Plus Project Levels of Service ......................................... 27

9.0 FUTURE YEAR PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS.................................. 30

9.1 Future Year Plus Project Levels of Service ............................................ 30

10.0 CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS......................................................... 32

10.1 Santa Ana Boulevard Capacity Analysis ................................................ 32

10.2 Altnernative Route Capacity Analysis ..................................................... 33

11.0 TRAIN CROSSING DELAY AND SAFETY ANALYSIS ................... 34

11.1 Existing (2011) Rail-Highway traffic conditions ....................................... 35

11.1.1 Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Delay ..................................... 35 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 259 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012
Page ii

11.1.2 Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Safety Analysis ...................... 35

11.2 Opening Year (2016) Rail-Highway Traffic Conditions............................ 36

11.2.1 Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Delay ..................................... 36

11.2.2 Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Safety Analysis ...................... 36

11.3 Future Year (2035) Rail-Highway Traffic Conditions ............................... 37

11.3.1 Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Delay ..................................... 37

11.3.2 Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Safety Analysis ...................... 37

11.4 CPUC Priority Index Number.................................................................. 38

12.0 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................. 38 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 260 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012
Page iii

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map .......................................................................................... 2 Figure 2: Proposed Project Improvements ...................................................................... 3 Figure 3: Study Area Intersections and Existing Lane Configurations .............................. 5 Figure 4: Existing AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................ 10 Figure 5: Opening Year (2016) AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ....................... 18 Figure 6: Future Year (2035) AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes........................... 22 Figure 7: Existing Plus Project AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ....................... 26 Figure 8: Opening Year (2016) Plus Project AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ... 28 Figure 9: Future Year (2035) Plus Project AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...... 31

LIST OF TABLES
Table 3-1 Levels of Service for Intersections .................................................................. 7 Table 4-1 Existing Intersection LOS ............................................................................... 9 Table 5-1 Cumulative Projects List and Descriptions .................................................... 17 Table 6-1 Opening Year (2016) Intersection LOS ......................................................... 19 Table 7-1 Future Year (2035) Intersection LOS ............................................................ 23 Table 8-1 Existing plus Project Intersection LOS .......................................................... 25 Table 9-1 Opening Year plus Project Intersection LOS ................................................ 29 Table 10-1 Future Year plus Project Intersection LOS .................................................. 30 Table 11-1 Santa Ana Boulevard Roadway Segment Analysis ..................................... 33 Table 12-1 Alternative Route Roadway Segment Analysis ........................................... 34 Table 13-1 Existing Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Delay Analysis ............................... 35 Table 14-1 Existing Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Safety Analysis .............................. 35 Table 15-1 Opening Year (2016) Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Delay Analysis .......... 36 Table 16-1 Opening Year (2016) Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Safety Analysis ......... 36 Table 17-1 Future Year (2035) Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Delay Analysis.............. 37 Table 18-1 Future Year (2035) Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Safety Analysis............. 37 Table 19-1 CPUC Priority Index Number ...................................................................... 38 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 261 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the methodology and results of the analyses performed to evaluate traffic operations for the proposed grade separation of the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at-grade crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California. Figure 1 shows the project location and vicinity map.

The primary purpose of the proposed project is to improve safety, as it will remove the existing at-grade conflict between vehicular traffic and rail traffic. In addition, the proposed project would reduce traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard. The analysis will show traffic operations with and without the proposed grade separation under existing (2011), opening year (2016), and future year (2035) conditions.

The future analysis accounts for major projects and plans in the surrounding area, including:
x Santa Ana Fixed Guideway (Streetcar) – Proposed streetcar would run at-grade along city streets (including Santa Ana Boulevard and Santiago Street) providing service between the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC) and a new transportation center in Garden Grove.
x Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC) Expansion – Proposed expansion would include, but not be limited to, provision of new parking and support facilities, safety features, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, bus circulation improvements, and geometric modifications to support service increases and the proposed streetcar project.
x Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report – Provides zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods and to reassign land use designations in support of a transit/pedestrian-oriented framework.

1.1 Project Description
The proposed project improvements extend along Santa Ana Boulevard from approximately Santiago Street at the west end to the west side of the Interstate 5 (I-5) southbound off-ramp intersection with Santa Ana Boulevard. As part of the grade separation, the proposed project includes minor improvements to the Santa Ana Boulevard/Santiago Street intersection; modifications of the SARTC driveway (driveway is located on the south side of Santa Ana Boulevard, between Santiago Street and the Metrolink tracks); the relocation of Santa Ana Boulevard approximately 30 feet southerly of its existing alignment; termination of Logan Street north of Santa Ana Boulevard by constructing a cul-de-sac; and additional improvements to Fuller Street, both north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard. The proposed project improvements are illustrated in Figure 2.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 262 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Project Vicinty Map.ai
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map
5 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 263 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Figure 2
Proposed Project Improvements
Landscape format 2.ai
5 EXHIBIT
2 City Council 22 – 264 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

1.2 Study Area
The analysis focuses on locations that could be directly affected by the reconfiguration of Santa Ana Boulevard and the closure of Logan Street as a result of the proposed project (either geometrically or with changed traffic levels). Therefore, the following locations were selected in consultation with City staff for analysis:

1. Santiago Street/Civic Center Drive

2. Santiago Street/Santa Ana Boulevard

3. Logan Street/Santa Ana Boulevard

4. Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC) Driveway/Santa Ana Boulevard

5. Fuller Street-Fruit Street/Santa Ana Boulevard

6. I-5 Southbound Ramps/Santa Ana Boulevard

7. Grand Avenue/Santa Ana Boulevard
The locations of the study area intersections and corresponding existing lane configurations are illustrated in Figure 3.

1.3 Study Periods
Traffic operations were evaluated for each of the following scenarios during the peak hour of the weekday AM (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and PM (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) peak periods:
x Existing (2011)
x Existing (2011) plus Project
x Opening Year (2016)
x Opening Year (2016) plus Project
x Opening Year (2016) plus Construction
x Future Year (2035)
x Future Year (2035) plus Project
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 265 5/5/2026

CIVIC CENTER DR

SANTIAGO ST

POINSETTIA ST

GARFIELD ST

SANTA ANA

BOULEVARD

STAFFORD ST

LINCOLN AV

LOGAN ST

FULLER ST

EASTWOOD AV

GRAND AV

CHESTER ST
E. WASHINGTON AV

FRUIT ST
6TH ST
6TH ST
5 N
Santa Ana Bl
Santiago St
Santa Ana Bl
Grand Av
Santa Ana Bl
Fuller St
Santa Ana Bl
I-5 SB Ramps
Civic Center Dr
Santiago St
Santa Ana Bl
Logan St
Santa Ana Bl
Transit Center driveway
LEGEND
Study IntersectionTraffic SignalStop Sign
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Figure 3
Study Area Intersections and Existing Lane Configurations existing geometry.ai

EXHIBIT
2 City Council 22 – 266 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

2.0 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
This section of the report presents the methodology used to perform the traffic analysis summarized in this report. The methodology described is consistent with the City of Santa Ana Circulation Element and the Caltrans’ Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies.

Street system operating conditions are typically described in terms of “level of service.” Level of service (LOS) is a report card scale used to indicate the quality of traffic flow on roadway segments and at intersection. Level of service ranges from LOS A (free flow, little congestion) to LOS F (forced flow, extreme congestion).

The project limits end to the east of the I-5 southbound on- and off-ramp to Santa Ana Boulevard, just west of Grand Avenue. However, since the limits of the proposed project improvements end just west of the I-5 southbound on and off-ramps and since the project is not anticipated to result in increases or decreases to the volumes along Santa Ana Boulevard, detailed evaluation of Caltrans facilities (including freeway mainline and rampqueuing analyses) is not required.

2.1 Intersection Capacity Analysis
Consistent with Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP 2009) requirements, the technique used to assess the operation of signalized intersections in Orange County is the intersection capacity utilization (ICU) method. To calculate the ICU value for an intersection, the volume of traffic using the intersection is compared with the capacity of the intersection.

The ICU value is expressed as a decimal fraction (e.g., 0.752). The decimal fraction represents that portion of the hour required to provide sufficient capacity to accommodate all intersection traffic.

The City of Santa Ana requires specific assumptions regarding input values to the ICU methodology. These assumptions include:
x Saturation Flow Rate of 1,700 vehicles per hour per lane (vphpl) for through lanes and 1,600 vphpl for turn lanes;
x Lost time factor of 5 percent; and,
x Credit for “de facto” right turn lanes (locations where a right turn lane is not formally striped, but enough width is provided such that vehicles are able to conduct right turns without disrupting through traffic in a shared through-right lane).

In addition to the above discussed ICU analysis method, the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis procedures have been used to analyze the intersections which are related to Caltrans facilities (ramp intersections), based on Caltrans requirements. As such, the intersection of the I-5 southbound ramps with Santa Ana Boulevard has been analyzed using the HCM signalized method, which reports the average control delay experienced by all vehicles using the intersection.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 267 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

The LOS for unsignalized intersections is also based on the HCM methodology, per City requirements. The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual includes a detailed discussion of the procedures used to calculate the LOS based on delay per vehicle for all-way and two-way stop controlled intersections. The HCM estimates the delay based on the worst approach at unsignalized intersections.

Table 3-1 includes the LOS ranges for all intersection types.

Table 3-1 Levels of Service for Intersections
Level of Service
Signalized
Intersection
Volume/Capacity
Ratio (ICU)1
Signalized
Intersection Total
Delay (seconds)
(HCM)2
Unsignalized
Intersection
Control Delay
(seconds) (HCM)2
A 0.000 – 0.600 0 -10 0 – 10
B 0.601 – 0.700 10 – 20 10 – 15
C 0.701 – 0.800 20 – 35 15 - 25
D 0.801 – 0.900 35 – 55 25 – 35
E 0.901 – 1.000 55 – 80 35 – 50
F 1.000 and up 80 or more 50 or more
Notes:
1 City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element 2
2000 Highway Capacity Manual
The following intersection was analyzed using the ICU methodology:
x Santiago Street/Santa Ana Boulevard
The remaining six intersections were analyzed using the HCM methodology.

2.2 Standard of Significance
The Circulation Element establishes LOS D as the minimum acceptable level of service for major intersections in the City, except in major development areas (MDA). The City of Santa Ana considers LOS E as the threshold for an acceptable level of service for intersections located within an MDA. The CMP also establishes LOS E as the maximum level of service for CMP facilities. However, no study area intersections are CMP facilities, nor are any intersections located within an MDA. Therefore, the LOS D threshold applies to all study intersections.

Impacts to study area intersections are considered significant if:
x With addition of the proposed project, the LOS at any study area intersection deteriorates from acceptable to unacceptable LOS (e.g., from LOS C to LOS E); x Within LOS E or worse, the project increases traffic demand at the study area intersection by 1% of capacity (ICU increase • 0.01); or x At unsignalized intersections operating at unacceptable LOS (LOS E or F), the proposed project adds 1% or more traffic delay (seconds per vehicle).

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 268 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
This section presents an overview of the existing roadway system, transit network, and pedestrian/bicycle facilities within the study area and the methodology used to determine existing traffic volumes.

3.1 Existing Roadway System
Key roadway facilities within the project study area are described below. The discussion presented here focuses on roadways that are approaches to the study intersections or roadways that are directly affected by the proposed project. x Santa Ana Boulevard: Santa Ana Boulevard is an east-west road classified by the City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element (Circulation Element) as a Primary Arterial east of Santiago Street to the I-5 Freeway. The segment between Santiago Street and the I-5 currently provides six lanes (three travel lanes in each direction). Parking is prohibited along this segment, and the posted speed limit is 35 miles per hour (mph).
x Santiago Street: Santiago Street is a north-south two-lane divided roadway south of Washington Avenue. It is classified as a Secondary Arterial per the City’s Circulation Element. On-street parking is generally allowed on Santiago Street north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard. The speed limit is 25 mph. Santiago Street becomes Penn Way north of Washington Avenue up to 17th Street. x Civic Center Drive: Civic Center Drive is a four-lane divided east-west road classified as a Secondary Arterial on the Circulation Element between Fairview Street and French Street. East of French Street, it is classified as a local road and has one travel lane in each direction. Parking is prohibited along Civic Center Drive, and the posted speed limit is 35 mph west of French Street. x Logan Street: Logan Street is a two-lane undivided north-south road and is designated as a Local Street per the Circulation Element. At the intersection of Logan Street with Santa Ana Boulevard (just west of the Metrolink crossing), Logan Street is accessed via a right-turn in/right-turn out only configuration. As part of the proposed project, this connection will be terminated by providing a culde-sac north of Santa Ana Boulevard. On-street parking is allowed on Logan Street. The speed limit is 25 mph.
x Fuller Street-Fruit Street: Fuller Street-Fruit Street is a two-lane undivided northsouth roadway and intersects Santa Ana Boulevard just east of the Metrolink crossing. On-street parking is provided on Fuller Street north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard. The project proposes to utilize the east/west portion of Fruit Street as a detour route to connect to Grand Avenue during the final construction phase. x I-5 Freeway: Interstate 5 (Santa Ana Freeway) provides primary north-south regional access to Santa Ana Boulevard. The I-5 southbound on- and off-ramps EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 269 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

are located on Santa Ana Boulevard. Access to the I-5 northbound is provided via Grand Avenue. The intersection of Grand Avenue/Santa Ana Boulevard also provides an entrance to the I-5 southbound high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane, and has an exit ramp from the I-5 northbound HOV lane.. x Grand Avenue: Grand Avenue is generally a north-south four-lane divided roadway. It is classified by the Circulation Element as a Major Arterial. Parking is prohibited along Grand Avenue, and the posted speed limit is 40 mph.

3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes
Vehicle turning movement counts were collected at the study intersections on Wednesday May 11, 2011 by Counts Unlimited, Inc. during the AM (7:00 AM – 9:00 AM) and PM (4:00 PM – 6:00 PM) peak periods. The peak hour volume used in the analysis was the highest single hour of traffic during each of the peak periods. Detailed vehicle turning movement data are included in Appendix A. The existing weekday AM and PM peak hour volumes at the study area intersections are shown on Figure 4.

3.3 Existing Intersection LOS
A level of service analysis was conducted to evaluate existing intersection operating conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Table 4-1 summarizes the existing level of service at the study area intersections. Level of service calculation worksheets are included in Appendix B.

Table 4-1 Existing Intersection LOS
Notes:

AWSC – all-way stop controlled intersection; TWSC – two-way stop controlled intersection; OWSC – one-way stop controlled intersection; Delay expressed in terms of seconds Bold denotes unacceptable LOS
1 ICU reported for all signalized locations, except Caltrans facilities. Delay (reported in seconds per vehicle) is reported for all unsignalized intersections and Caltrans facilities. For AWSC, the average delay is calculated whereas for TWSC, the delay of the worst approach is calculated.

Intersection Traffic
Control
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

ICU LOS ICU LOS
Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 0.479 A 0.538 A
Delay LOS Delay LOS
Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 28.1 C 25.7 C
Santiago St/Civic Center Dr AWSC 11.4 B 12.3 B
Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 11.2 B 9.7 A
SARTC Dwy/Santa Ana Blvd OWSC 9.7 A 11.8 B
Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd OWSC >50 F >50 F
I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 25.5 C 26.4 C
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 270 5/5/2026

CIVIC CENTER DR

SANTIAGO ST

POINSETTIA ST

GARFIELD ST

SANTA ANA

BOULEVARD

STAFFORD ST

LINCOLN AV

LOGAN ST

FULLER ST

EASTWOOD AV

GRAND AV

CHESTER ST
E. WASHINGTON AV

FRUIT ST
6TH ST
6TH ST
5 N
Santa Ana Bl
Santiago St
Santa Ana Bl
Grand Av
Santa Ana Bl
Fuller St
Santa Ana Bl
I-5 SB Ramps
Civic Center Dr
Santiago St
Santa Ana Bl
Logan St
Santa Ana Bl
Transit Center driveway
LEGEND
Study IntersectionAM(PM) Peak HourTraffic Volumes
581 (1076)
39 (33)
35 (97)
1201 (680)
616 (1166)
21 (14)
8 (8)
1197 (660)
230 (663)393 (608)
378 (296)
84 (83) 264 (193) 1114 (571)
100 (234)
43 (52)
148 (257)
2 (4)
216 (158)
47 (38)
14 (15)
123 (169)
153 (57) 7 (10)
45 (11)
47 (11)
29 (43)
326 (750)
19 (16)
220 (240)
122 (128)
83 (61)
62 (104)
43 (77)
21 (42) 241 (142)
836 (439)
114 (103)
4 (7)
583 (1149)
25 (15)
1 (16)
0 (1)
1 (6)
23 (82)
0 (0)
22 (24) 6 (3)
1148 (648)
32 (14)
161 (269)120 (207)451 (323)
77(215)
106 (44)
1026 (573)
972 (372)
99 (150)
844 (1573)
18 (19)
16 (65)275 (145)14 (31)
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Figure 4
Existing Traffic Volumes
existing volumes.ai
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 271 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

As shown in Table 4-1, all study area intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS with the exception of:
x Fuller Street/Santa Ana Boulevard: LOS F in both the AM and PM peak hours It should be noted that this location experiences significant delays on the minor street approach (Fuller Street) due to the high volume on Santa Ana Boulevard that is not required to stop. Utilizing the Federal Highway Administration’s (FWA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) Signal Warrant 3 (Peak Hour Warrant), this location does not warrant a signal under existing conditions. The signal warrant worksheets are included in Appendix C.

3.4 Existing Transit Facilities
The OCTA is the main transit service provider in Orange County, and it offers a wide range of services including an extensive network of fixed-route transit service throughout Orange County. SARTC is located just south of the proposed project on the southeast corner of Santiago Street/Santa Ana Boulevard. It serves as a transfer point for OCTA buses, Metrolink, and Amtrak.

The following OCTA bus routes directly serve the proposed project area:
x Route 59 (Anaheim to Irvine via Kraemer Boulevard/Glassell Street/Grand Avenue/Von Karman Avenue): Local fixed-route service that operates along Santa Ana Boulevard in the study area with service provided every 20 minutes. x Route 83 (Anaheim to Laguna Hills via I-5 Freeway/Main Street): Local fixed-route service that operates along Santa Ana Boulevard within the study area. Service frequency varies from 20 to 35 minutes.
x Route 206 (Santa Ana to Lake Forest Express via I-5 Freeway): Intracounty express route that operates along Santa Ana Boulevard within the study area, with service every 30 minutes.
x Route 462 (The Depot at Santa Ana to Civic Center via Santa Ana Boulevard/Civic Center Drive): Stationlink Metrolink rail feeder route service that operates along Santa Ana Boulevard and Civic Center Drive within the study area, with service every 15 minutes.
x Route 463 (The Depot at Santa Ana to Hutton Centre via Grand Avenue):

Stationlink Metrolink rail feeder route service that operates along Santa Ana Boulevard and Grand Avenue within the study area, with service every 15 minutes. x Route 464 (The Depot at Santa Ana to Costa Mesa via 5 Fwy/55 Fwy/Sunflower Avenue): Stationlink Metrolink rail feeder route service that operates along Santa Ana Boulevard within the study area, with service every 15 minutes.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 272 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

3.4.1 EXISTING BUS STOPS
In the study area there are several bus stop locations that would either be relocated during and/or after the completion of the project’s construction or may be affected by an increase in traffic along the street as a result of construction detours or diversion of traffic due to project improvements. The existing bus stops within the study area include:

Route 59
Eastbound on Santa Ana Boulevard
A total of three bus stops are provided on south side of street, between the existing tracks and the SARTC driveway, just east of Fuller Street, and just west of Grand Avenue.

Westbound on Santa Ana Boulevard
Three bus stops are provided on north side of street, one between the Logan Street and Santiago Street, one between Fuller Street and the railroad tracks, and one between the I-5 ramps and Grand Avenue.

Route 83
Eastbound on Santa Ana Boulevard
Two bus stops are located on south side of street, one between the existing tracks and the SARTC driveway, and the other just east of Fuller Street.

Westbound on Santa Ana Boulevard
Three bus stops are located on north side of street, between the Logan Street and Santiago Street, one between Fuller Street and the railroad tracks, and between the I-5 ramps and Grand Avenue.

Route 206
Eastbound on Santa Ana Boulevard
A total of three bus stops are provided on south side of street, between the existing tracks and the SARTC driveway, just east of Fuller Street, and just west of Grand Avenue.

Westbound on Santa Ana Boulevard
Three bus stops are located on north side of street, between the Logan Street and Santiago Street, one between Fuller Street and the railroad tracks, and between the I-5 ramps and Grand Avenue.

Routes 462, 463, 464
Eastbound on Santa Ana Boulevard
There are currently no on-street bus stops within the project area. The only stop is provided at The Depot at Santa Ana.

Westbound on Santa Ana Boulevard
There are currently no on-street bus stops within the project area. The only stop is provided at The Depot at Santa Ana.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 273 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

3.5 Existing Pedestrian Facilities
Within the project limits, sidewalks are provided on both the north and south sides of Santa Ana Boulevard, as well as the east and west sides of Santiago Street, Logan Street, and Fuller Street-Fruit Street. At the intersection of Santiago Street/Santa Ana Boulevard, pedestrian crosswalks are provided on all four approaches. Pedestrian crosswalks are also provided across the SARTC driveway, the existing Metrolink tracks, the south and west approaches of the I-5 freeway ramps, and on all four approaches at the Grand Avenue/Santa Ana Boulevard intersection. Striped pedestrian crosswalks are not provided at Logan Street and at Fuller Street-Fruit Street. Pedestrians can cross Santa Ana Boulevard at either Santiago Street, I-5 ramps, or Grand Avenue.

3.6 Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bicycle usage is encouraged within the City of Santa Ana; however, there are currently no striped or marked bicycle facilities within the project limits. Class II bicycle facilities are planned on Santa Ana Boulevard and included in the OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan as well as the City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element’s Bikeway Master Plan.

3.7 Existing Santa Ana Boulevard/OCTA Metrolink AtGrade Crossing The existing at-grade crossing is used by several passenger rail lines including Metrolink Orange County and Inland Empire/Orange County (IEOC) lines and the Amtrak Pacific Surfliner line.

For Metrolink lines, the existing service schedules include the following:

Orange County Line (OC)
x Two trains per hour per direction in both the weekday AM and PM peak hours and 22 trains per day in each direction
Inland Empire Orange County Line (IEOC)
x Two trains per hour per direction in both the weekday AM and PM peak hours and 20 trains per day in each direction
Amtrak Pacific Surfliner operates with one train per day in the peak hour each way and 13-14 trains per day each direction. The BNSF freight rail traffic also uses this crossing with approximately 10 freight trains per day during off-peak hours, resulting in a total of 66 trains crossing during a typical weekday.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 274 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

3.7.1 RAIL AT-GRADE CROSSING IMPACT CRITERIA
In order to analyze existing and future vehicle delay at the Santa Ana Boulevard at-grade rail crossing, a spreadsheet model was created. This model utilizes methodology extracted from the work of the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) and the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) to determine vehicle delay at grade crossings in Southern California. The calculation takes into account a number of factors, including:
x Existing and future traffic volumes
x Existing and future train trips and number of trains
x Roadway classification/number of lanes
x Type of traffic control at the crossing, and distance of railroad tracks from intersection (mid-block or adjacent to intersection)
Two key formulas are used to establish peak-hour vehicle delay. For purposes of this study, the two formulas were utilized to evaluate total gate blockage time and peak hour vehicle delay. These equations form the basis of the at-grade delay analysis described later in this report.

Total Gate Blockage Time
TB = 0.603 + ((50 + L + W) / V)
Where:

TB = total blockage time per train in minutes
L = length of train in feet (assumed to be 4,500 feet)
W = roadway width at crossing in feet
V = train speed in feet per second (assumed to be 45 mph or 66 fps) Note: Train speed limit at Santa Ana Boulevard crossing is 50 mph The total gate blockage time formula utilizes several physical characteristics about the crossing, as well as train volumes, to determine blockage time.

Daily and Peak Hour Vehicle Delay
The delay at an at-grade crossing is a function of the time crossing blockage, traffic volume, and the rate of vehicle queue discharge after the train has passed. This can be calculated on a daily or peak hour basis. In order to isolate the delay to vehicles incurred due to rail crossing blockage, the following formula was used:

Delay = (TB * 2)*(q/2)*(1-q/d))
Where:

Delay = total minutes of vehicle delay
TB = the length of time the crossing is blocked by the train q = vehicle arrival rate, vehicles per minute
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 275 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

d = vehicle departure rate, vehicles per minute (assumed 1,520 vphpl) Peak hour vehicle delay is displayed for each scenario in order to show delay attributable to crossing blockage alone. It is not intended to be used additively with intersection performance characteristics.

Safety Assessment Criteria
The most widely used measure of rail safety at at-grade crossings is known as the hazard index. This index is intended to identify the relative estimated hazard among the crossing included in this analysis. It is neither intended to specifically identify high or low probability of accidents, nor is it meant to predict rail/vehicular traffic accidents due to an increase in train activity in the future.

The following equation best fit the composite arithmetic average of all the rankings as determined by the eleven different hazard index formulae and has been accepted for use as part of the CPUC’s Field Inspection Checklists:

H = (V * T * Pf) / 1000
Where:

H = the calculated hazard index
V = the average 24-hour vehicular traffic volumes (ADT) T = the average 24-hour train volume
Pf = the protection factor (0.11 for automatic gates)
CPUC Priority Index Number Formula
In order to assist the California Transportation Commission (CTC) and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to allocate limited available funds to the program for assisting local governments in financing grade separation or crossing elimination projects, the CPUC has established the highway-rail Grade Separation Priority List formula to rank the at-grade crossings in order to prioritize their need for improvement.

For the Santa Ana Boulevard at-grade crossing, a priority index number was calculated using the Priority Index Formula (at-grade crossing nominated for separation or elimination) below:

P = V * (T + 0.1*LRT) * (AH+1) + SCF
C
Where:

P = priority index number
V = average 24-hour vehicular traffic volumes (1 point per vehicle) T = average 24-hour train volume (1 point per train)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 276 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

C = project cost share to be allocated from Grade Separation Fund (1 point per thousand dollars – assume 1,250 points ($1,250,000/$1,000 = 1,250 points)
LRT = average 24-hour light rail train volume (1 point per train) AH = accident history (up to 3 points per accident)
SCF = special conditions factor = BD+VS+RS+CG+PT+OF (up to 63 points)
BD = crossing blocking delay (up to 5 points)
VS = vehicular speed limit (up to 5 points)
RS = railroad prevailing maximum speed (up to 7 points) CG = crossing geometrics (up to 17 points)
PT = passenger trains (up to 10 points)
OF = other factors: passenger buses, school buses, carrying hazardous material (trains and trucks), and community impact (up to 19 points) It should be noted that the overall conclusion of the at-grade crossing analysis would be to substantiate the benefit of the proposed grade separation.

4.0 OPENING YEAR (2016) CONDITIONS
The methodology used to develop the background traffic forecasts for near-term Opening Year (2016) conditions are described below.

4.1 Opening Year (2016) Traffic Volumes
The Opening Year (2016) background traffic is composed of existing traffic (based on the count data), background growth per year, and the traffic that is anticipated to occur based on known development projects within the vicinity of the study area that could contribute traffic to the various study area roadways and intersections.

4.1.1 BACKGROUND GROWTH
In order to define regional growth that would affect the future traffic conditions within the study area, an ambient annual growth rate of 0.5% per year (consistent with City recommendations) for the study area was applied to existing volumes to create the background Opening Year (2016) conditions.

4.1.2 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS
An active development project list from the City of Santa Ana (dated October 2011) was obtained in order to identify relevant projects near the proposed project. Based on consultation with City staff, all cumulative projects within a 1.5-mile radius from the proposed grade separation project were included in the Opening Year (2016) analysis. A total of 17 cumulative projects were identified and are listed in Table 5-1 below.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 277 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

Table 5-1 Cumulative Projects List and Descriptions
Project Address Land Use
Res.

Units
Square
Feet
1 Alliance Church of
Orange 2130 N Grand Ave.

Church Addition
(Gym/classroom) 21,000
2 C & C Affordable
Housing Project 605 E Washington Ave. Residential apartments 36 3 Catalina Retail Building 2102 N Tustin Ave. Commercial 5,580 4 City Venture 606-620 E Fifth St.

Residential
Condo/Townhouse 8
5 Discovery Science
Center Ph. II 2032 N Main 275-seat IMAX theater
6 Downtown Artist Lofts
III 201-291 N Sycamore St. Artist Live/Work Lofts 16
7 First and Cabrillo
Towers 1901 E First St. Residential Condo 374
8 Francis Xavier 801 E Santa Ana Blvd. Apartments 12
9 Latino Health Access
Comm. Ctr. 602 E Fourth St. Public 3,074
10 McDonalds 1100 S Grand Ave. Restaurant 3,838
11 One Broadway Plaza 1109 N Broadway Residential Tower 518,000 12 Related Co. Apartments
Phase I 611 E Minter St. Residential apartments 74
13 Related Co. Apartments
Phase I 611 E Minter St. Commercial 1,500
14 Related Co. Apartments
Phase II 714 E Santa Ana Blvd. Residential apartments 13 15 Related Co. Apartments
Phase II 801 E Brown St. Residential apartments 12
16 TAVA Homes 1584 E Santa Clara Ave.

Single Family
Residence 24
17 Xerox Tower II 200 N Cabrillo Park Dr. Office 210,000 Source: City of Santa Ana Environmental Cumulative Project List (October 2011).

Trips for these cumulative projects were forecast utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 8th Edition and are documented in Appendix D. As shown in Appendix D, the 17 cumulative projects are anticipated to generate approximately 15,207 daily trips, with 1,465 trips occurring during the AM peak hour and 1,609 trips occurring during the PM peak hour. The trip distribution was based on other traffic study reports provided by the City of Santa Ana as well as likely routes to and from each of the planned projects.

The resulting Opening Year (2016) background traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 278 5/5/2026

CIVIC CENTER DR

SANTIAGO ST

POINSETTIA ST

GARFIELD ST

SANTA ANA

BOULEVARD

STAFFORD ST

LINCOLN AV

LOGAN ST

FULLER ST

EASTWOOD AV

GRAND AV

CHESTER ST
E. WASHINGTON AV

FRUIT ST
6TH ST
6TH ST
5 N
Santa Ana Bl
Santiago St
Santa Ana Bl
Grand Av
Santa Ana Bl
Fuller St
Santa Ana Bl
I-5 SB Ramps
Civic Center Dr
Santiago St
Santa Ana Bl
Logan St
Santa Ana Bl
Transit Center driveway
LEGEND
Study IntersectionAM(PM) Peak HourTraffic Volumes
648 (1230)
40 (34)
36 (99)
1313 (752)
683 (1322)
22 (14)
8 (8)
1309 (731)
251 (719)
440 (711)
387 (304)
103 (95) 271 (199) 1207 (630)
103 (242)
47 (65)
159 (294)
2 (4)
231 (175)
50 (40)
16 (16)
126 (173)
186 (80) 7 (10)
59 (16)
49 (12)
41 (61)
373 (861)
19 (16)
238 (281)
125 (131)
94 (75)
64 (107)
44 (79)
22 (43) 269 (157)
917 (495)
117 (106)
4 (7)
650 (1305)
26 (15)
1 (16)
0 (1)
1 (6)
24 (84)
0 (0)
23 (25) 6 (3)
1259 (719)
33 (14)
195 (357)123 (212)469 (338)
77(215)
109 (45)
1059 (423)
1052 (587)
103 (158)
865 (1612)
18 (19)
16 (67)282 (149)14 (32)
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Figure 5
Opening Year (2016) Traffic Volumes
2016 volumes.ai
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 279 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

4.2 Opening Year (2016) Intersection LOS
A level of service analysis was conducted to evaluate Opening Year (2016) intersection operating conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Table 6-1 summarizes the Opening Year (2016) level of service at the study area intersections. Level of service calculation worksheets are included in Appendix E.

Table 6-1 Opening Year (2016) Intersection LOS
Notes:

AWSC – all-way stop controlled intersection; TWSC – two-way stop controlled intersection; Delay expressed in terms of seconds
Bold denotes unacceptable LOS
1 ICU reported for all signalized locations, except Caltrans facilities. Delay (reported in seconds per vehicle) is reported for all unsignalized intersections and Caltrans facilities. For AWSC, the average delay is calculated whereas for TWSC, the delay of the worst approach is calculated.

As shown in Table 6-1, all study area intersections are forecast to continue to operate at acceptable LOS (only minor increases to ICU and delay from existing conditions) under Opening Year (2016) conditions with the exception of:
x Fuller Street/Santa Ana Boulevard: LOS F in both the AM and PM peak hours It should be noted that this location was previously determined to operate with unacceptable conditions under Existing conditions, and still does not meet the peak hour warrant for a traffic signal (Warrant 3, Peak Hour, CA MUTCD, 2009) under both Existing and Opening Year (2016) conditions, as shown in Appendix C.

Intersection Traffic
Control
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

ICU LOS ICU LOS
Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 0.521 A 0.598 A
Delay LOS
(sec)
Delay LOS
Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 28.8 C 26.4 C(sec)
Santiago St/Civic Center Dr AWSC 12.3 B 13.3 B
Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 11.6 B 9.8 A
SARTC Dwy/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 9.9 A 12.5 B
Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC >50 F >50 F
I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 26.0 C 26.6 C
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 280 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

5.0 FUTURE YEAR (2035) CONDITIONS
The methodology used to develop the background traffic forecasts for long-term Future Year (2035) conditions are described below. As previously discussed, the future analysis will account for major projects and plans within the study area, including:
x Santa Ana Fixed Guideway (Streetcar) – Proposed streetcar would run along city streets (including Santa Ana Boulevard and Santiago Street) providing service between the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC) and a new transportation center in Garden Grove.
x Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC) Expansion –Proposed expansion would include, but not limited to, provision of new parking and support facilities, safety features, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, bus circulation improvements, and geometric modifications to support service increases and the proposed streetcar project.
x Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report – Provides zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods and to reassign land use designations in support of a transit/pedestrian-oriented framework.

5.1 Future Year (2035) Traffic Volumes
In order to maintain consistency with other traffic study reports in the City of Santa Ana, future (2035) traffic volumes were developed (where applicable) consistent with the Santa Ana Renaissance Specific Plan Traffic Study (KOA Corporation, 2010) for the Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The long-range (2035) analysis as part of that study was based on future background traffic forecasts obtained from the Orange County Traffic Analysis Model (OCTAM 3.2), with modifications to comply with the more recent OCTAM 3.3 model. This travel demand-forecasting model is used to evaluate circulation and transit system needs throughout the County. The model assumes buildout of the Transit Zoning Code land uses and operation of Phase 1 of the Santa Ana Fixed Guideway (Streetcar) proposal.

The increment between existing and future 2035 traffic volumes in the Santa Ana Renaissance Specific Plan Traffic Study was calculated for each turning movement at each intersection. These increments were then added to the existing traffic counts to develop Future Year (2035) traffic volumes at the following four intersections:
x Santiago Street/Civic Center Drive
x Santiago Street/Santa Ana Boulevard
x I-5 Southbound Ramps/Santa Ana Boulevard
x Grand Avenue/Santa Ana Boulevard
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 281 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

The Future Year (2035) turning movements for remaining three intersections (intersections of Logan Street, SARTC Driveway, and Fuller Street with Santa Ana Boulevard), not included in the Santa Ana Renaissance Specific Plan, were forecast similar to the Opening Year (2016) conditions. The 0.5% ambient annual growth rate was applied coupled with the addition of the cumulative project trip assignment to existing counts. The future traffic volumes at these three locations were balanced with the previous four locations to maintain flow consistency through each of the study intersections. Figure 6 shows the resulting Future Year (2035) AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study area intersections.

5.2 Future Year (2035) Geometric Assumptions
To assess Future Year (2035) conditions, geometric improvements as part of the major projects and plans were assumed to be in place for this analysis. These projects include the Santa Ana Fixed Guideway (Streetcar) proposal, the SARTC Expansion, and the Transit Zoning Code. The improvements for each major project/plan, as they relate to the project, are presented below.

Santa Ana Fixed Guideway (Streetcar)
x As part of the streetcar proposal, the intersection of Santiago Street/Santa Ana Boulevard would be modified to account for streetcar operations through this intersection. Therefore, appropriate signal timing adjustments (additional loss time) were made to reflect operation of the streetcar through this intersection. The additional loss time was derived based on the time needed for the streetcar to clear the intersection, averaged over the course of an hour.

SARTC Expansion
x The proposed expansion includes the improvements to Santiago Street/Santa Ana Boulevard consistent with the streetcar proposal consistent with those listed above. Additional modifications reflected as part of the grade separation project include modifications to the existing SARTC driveway at Santa Ana Boulevard, and modifications to the Fuller-Fruit Street/Santa Ana Boulevard intersection as the transit center proposes to expand east of the Metrolink tracks. It should be noted, however, that these modifications would not affect traffic patterns or level of service results.

Transit Zoning Code EIR
The Future Year (2035) analysis also includes mitigation measures required as part of the Transit Zoning Code EIR. The following improvements to impacted locations in the Transit Zoning Code EIR were assumed to be in place for this analysis:

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 282 5/5/2026

CIVIC CENTER DR

SANTIAGO ST

POINSETTIA ST

GARFIELD ST

SANTA ANA

BOULEVARD

STAFFORD ST

LINCOLN AV

LOGAN ST

FULLER ST

EASTWOOD AV

GRAND AV

CHESTER ST
E. WASHINGTON AV

FRUIT ST
6TH ST
6TH ST
5 N
Santa Ana Bl
Santiago St
Santa Ana Bl
Grand Av
Santa Ana Bl
Fuller St
Santa Ana Bl
I-5 SB Ramps
Civic Center Dr
Santiago St
Santa Ana Bl
Logan St
Santa Ana Bl
Transit Center driveway
LEGEND
Study IntersectionAM(PM) Peak HourTraffic Volumes
581 (1607)
39 (37)
35 (109)
1201 (1061)
1102 (1644)
24 (16)
9 (9)
1656 (1036)
412 (968)861 (909)
133 (193)
489 (388) 383 (245) 1521 (1001)
150 (338)
56 (68)
199 (404)
5 (7)
700 (492)
117 (71)
36 (30)
441 (557)
235 (89) 15 (18)
58 (15)
66 (22)
171 (215)
584 (1111)
30 (42)
406 (362)
252 (264)
328 (190)
111 (171)
223 (249)
60 (72) 458 (258)
1087 (663)
144 (140)
4 (8)
1070 (1619)
28 (17)
1 (18)
0 (1)
1 (7)
26 (92)
0 (0)
25 (27)
7 (3)
1611 (1176)
36 (16)
431 (486)201 (468)608 (418)
77(215)
236 (171)
1218 (670)
1782 (917)
106 (225)
1091 (2298)
40 (93)
39 (109)353 (187)18 (87)
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Figure 6
Future Year (2035) Traffic Volumes
2035 volumes.ai
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 283 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

x Santiago Street/Civic Center Drive: Installation of a traffic signal, modification of southbound approach to provide one shared-through left and one shared-through right, modification of eastbound approach to provide one left-turn, one through, and one right-turn lane, and restriping of the westbound approach to provide one shared-through left and a shared-through right.
x Santiago Street/Santa Ana Boulevard: Addition of a second southbound left-turn lane.
x Grand Avenue/Santa Ana Boulevard: Addition of a third southbound through lane, a third northbound through lane, and addition of an eastbound right-turn overlap phase.

5.3 Future Year (2035) Intersection LOS
A level of service analysis was conducted to evaluate Future Year (2035) intersection operating conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Table 7-1 summarizes the Future Year (2035) level of service at the study area intersections. Level of service calculation worksheets are included in Appendix F.

Table 7-1 Future Year (2035) Intersection LOS
Notes:

AWSC – all-way stop controlled intersection; TWSC – two-way stop controlled intersection; Delay expressed in terms of seconds.

Bold denotes unacceptable LOS
1 ICU reported for all signalized locations, except Caltrans facilities. Delay (reported in seconds per vehicle) is reported for all unsignalized intersections and Caltrans facilities. For AWSC, the average delay is calculated whereas for TWSC, the delay of the worst approach is calculated.

As shown in Table 7-1, all study area intersections are forecast to continue to operate at acceptable LOS under Future Year (2035) conditions with the exception of:
x Fuller Street/Santa Ana Boulevard: LOS F in both the AM and PM peak hours Although the ICU and delay at all study intersections would increase from Opening Year (2016) conditions, Future Year (2035) traffic increases would not cause any intersection to operate unacceptably. The mitigations and improvements as part of the Transit Zoning Intersection Traffic
Control
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

ICU LOS ICU LOS
Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 0.771 C 0.774 C
Santiago St/Civic Center Dr Signal 0.559 A 0.610 B
Delay LOS Delay LOS
Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 32.1 C 37.8 D
Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 12.9 B 10.7 B
SARTC Dwy/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 9.7 A 14.7 B
Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC >50 F >50 F
I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 31.7 C 30.7 C
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 284 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

Code would maintain acceptable LOS at the intersections of Santiago Street/Civic Center Drive, Santiago Street/Santa Ana Boulevard, and Grand Avenue/Santa Ana Boulevard under future conditions.

As mentioned previously, the Fuller Street/Santa Ana Boulevard intersection would not meet the peak hour warrant for a traffic signal (Warrant 3, Peak Hour, CA MUTCD, 2009) under Existing, Opening Year (2016) and Future Year 2035 conditions.

6.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
The project proposes to grade-separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/OCTA Metrolink at-grade crossing between Logan Street and Fuller Street. The associated project improvements extend along Santa Ana Boulevard from approximately Santiago Street at the west end to the west side of the Interstate 5 (I-5) southbound off-ramp intersection with Santa Ana Boulevard. As part of the grade separation, the proposed project includes the following improvements:
x Termination of Logan Street north of Santa Ana Boulevard via construction of a cul-de-sac; and,
x Restripe Fuller Street, both north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard to provide one shared through-left and one exclusive right turn lane (de facto right turn lane) while maintaining the unsignalized traffic control.

The project also proposes a minor reconfiguration of the Santiago Street/Santa Ana Boulevard intersection, but would not affect traffic operations or capacity. However, due to the proposed termination of Logan Street as part of the project, traffic would be diverted to alternate routes, as described below. No other reassignments or rerouting of vehicular traffic would be required with the project, and the grade separation itself is not anticipated to increase traffic demand along Santa Ana Boulevard

6.1 Traffic Diversion Due to Termination of Logan Street North of Santa Ana Boulevard
With the existing configuration of Logan Street, vehicles enter (approximately 8 vehicles in the weekday AM peak hour and 8 vehicles in the weekday PM peak hour) and exit (approximately 21 vehicles in the weekday AM peak hour and weekday 14 vehicles in the PM peak hour) Logan Street from/to Santa Ana Boulevard via a right-turn in/out only operation (i.e., access to and from Logan Street is allowed via westbound Santa Ana Boulevard only). With the termination of Logan Street with the project, these volumes (vehicles making a westbound right from Santa Ana Boulevard to Logan Street and a southbound right from Logan Street to Santa Ana Boulevard) would need to be reassigned to alternative routes.

As no connections to Logan Street and the adjacent roadways are available from further east on Santa Ana Boulevard (due to the presence of the railroad right of way), all vehicular access would be via Santiago Street. Therefore, vehicles previously making a right-turn into Logan Street from Santa Ana Boulevard would need to reroute to make a EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 285 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

westbound right-turn at Santiago Street, followed by a northbound right-turn at Civic Center Drive to arrive at their destinations at or near Logan Street. Vehicles previously making a southbound right-turn from Logan Street to Santa Ana Boulevard would need to reroute to head north on Logan Street to westbound Stafford Street-Civic Center Drive, then either north or south on Santiago Street to reach their destinations.

7.0 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS
An existing plus project scenario was analyzed based on the addition of the project to the existing transportation network. For this evaluation, the geometric improvements as part of the project, coupled with the redistribution of traffic due to the termination of Logan Street were analyzed under an Existing plus Project scenario and were compared to existing baseline conditions. Figure 7 shows the resulting existing plus project AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study area intersections.

7.1 Existing Plus Project Levels of Service
A level of service analysis was conducted to evaluate existing intersection operating conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours with the proposed project. Table 8-1 summarizes the existing level of service at the study area intersections. Level of service calculation worksheets are included in Appendix G.

Table 8-1 Existing plus Project Intersection LOS
Notes:

AWSC – all-way stop controlled intersection; TWSC – two-way stop controlled intersection; Delay expressed in seconds Bold denotes unacceptable LOS
1 ICU reported for all signalized locations, except Caltrans facilities. Delay (reported in seconds per vehicle) is reported for all unsignalized intersections and Caltrans facilities. For AWSC, the average delay is calculated whereas for TWSC, the delay of the worst approach is calculated.
2 Intersection would be closed as part of the project
Existing Existing + Project
Intersection
Traffic
Control
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour

ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS
Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 0.479 A 0.538 A 0.532 A 0.588 A Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 28.1 C 25.7 C 28.1 C 25.7 C Santiago St/Civic Center Dr AWSC 11.4 B 12.3 B 11.6 B 12.4 B Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 11.2 B 9.7 B n/a2n/a2
SARTC Dwy/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 9.7 A 11.8 B 9.7 A 11.8 B Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC >50 F >50 F >50 F >50 F
I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 25.5 C 26.4 C 25.6 C 26.4 C EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 286 5/5/2026

CIVIC CENTER DR

SANTIAGO ST

POINSETTIA ST

GARFIELD ST

SANTA ANA

BOULEVARD

STAFFORD ST

LINCOLN AV

LOGAN ST

FULLER ST

EASTWOOD AV

GRAND AV

CHESTER ST
E. WASHINGTON AV

FRUIT ST
6TH ST
6TH ST
5 N
Santa Ana Bl
Santiago St
Santa Ana Bl
Grand Av
Santa Ana Bl
Fuller St
Santa Ana Bl
I-5 SB Ramps
Civic Center Dr
Santiago St
Santa Ana Bl
Logan St
Santa Ana Bl
Transit Center driveway
LEGEND
Study IntersectionAM(PM) Peak HourTraffic Volumes
581 (1076)
39 (33)
35 (97)
1209 (688)
616 (1166)
21 (14)
0 (0)
1205 (668)
230 (663)393 (608)
378 (296)
84 (83) 264 (193) 1114 (571)
100 (234)
43 (52)
148 (257)
2 (4)
216 (158)
47 (38)
22 (23)
123 (169)
153 (57) 11 (13)
49 (14)
60 (19)
29 (43)
326 (750)
19 (16)
229 (245)
122 (128)
87 (64)
62 (104)
43 (77)
21 (42) 244 (147)
828 (433)
105 (98)
4 (7)
583 (1149)
25 (15)
1 (16)
0 (1)
1 (6)
23 (82)
0 (0)
22 (24) 6 (3)
1148 (648)
32 (14)
161 (269)120 (207)451 (323)
77(215)
106 (44)
1026 (573)
972 (372)
99 (150)
844 (1573)
18 (19)
16 (65)275 (145)14 (31)
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Figure 7
Existing Plus Project Traffic Volumes
existing + project volumes.ai
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 287 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

As shown in Table 8-1, all study area intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS with addition of the project with the exception of:
x Fuller Street/Santa Ana Boulevard: Continues to operate at LOS F in both the AM and PM peak hours
However, this location would operate at LOS F without the project; therefore, the additional delay (less than the 1% threshold of significance) with the project would not constitute a significant impact.

As previously discussed, this location does not meet the signal warrant criteria under Existing conditions. Since the project would not add any traffic to the minor street approach (Fuller Street), a traffic signal would still not be warranted under Existing plus Project conditions.

At all other locations, the project would result in minimal changes to the ICU values or the average delays per vehicle. Overall, the project would not result in any significant traffic impacts under Existing plus Project conditions.

Access to the current train station and the Fuller Street-Fruit/Santa Ana Boulevard intersection would not be affected by the addition of the project to existing conditions.

8.0 OPENING YEAR PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS
This section analyzes the geometric improvements as part of the project, coupled with the redistribution of traffic due to the termination of Logan Street under Opening Year (2016) traffic conditions. Figure 8 shows the resulting Opening Year (2016) AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study area intersections.

8.1 Opening Year Plus Project Levels of Service
A level of service analysis was conducted to evaluate Opening Year (2016) intersection operating conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours with the proposed project. Table 9-1 summarizes the existing level of service at the study area intersections.

Level of service calculation worksheets are included in Appendix H.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 288 5/5/2026

CIVIC CENTER DR

SANTIAGO ST

POINSETTIA ST

GARFIELD ST

SANTA ANA

BOULEVARD

STAFFORD ST

LINCOLN AV

LOGAN ST

FULLER ST

EASTWOOD AV

GRAND AV

CHESTER ST
E. WASHINGTON AV

FRUIT ST
6TH ST
6TH ST
5 N
Santa Ana Bl
Santiago St
Santa Ana Bl
Grand Av
Santa Ana Bl
Fuller St
Santa Ana Bl
I-5 SB Ramps
Civic Center Dr
Santiago St
Santa Ana Bl
Logan St
Santa Ana Bl
Transit Center driveway
LEGEND
Study IntersectionAM(PM) Peak HourTraffic Volumes
648 (1230)
40 (34)
36 (99)
1321 (760)
683 (1322)
0 (0)
1317 (739)
251 (719)
440 (711)
387 (304)
103 (95) 271 (199) 1207 (630)
103 (242)
47 (65)
159 (294)
2 (4)
231 (175)
50 (40)
24 (24)
126 (173)
186 (80) 11 (13)
63 (19)
63 (20)
41 (61)
373 (861)
19 (16)
248 (286)
125 (131)
98 (78)
64 (107)
44 (79)
22 (43) 273 (162)
908 (489)
108 (101)
4 (7)
650 (1305)
26 (15)
1 (16)
0 (1)
1 (6)
24 (84)
0 (0)
23 (25) 6 (3)
1259 (719)
33 (14)
195 (357)123 (212)469 (338)
77(215)
109 (45)
1059 (423)
1052 (587)
103 (158)
865 (1612)
18 (19)
16 (67)282 (149)14 (32)
0 (0)
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Figure 8
Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Traffic Volumes
2016 + project volumes.ai
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 289 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

Table 9-1 Opening Year plus Project Intersection LOS
Opening Year (2016) Opening Year + Project
Intersection
Traffic
Control
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour

ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS
Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 0.521 A 0.598 A 0.587 A 0.662 B Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 28.8 C 26.4 C 29.4 C 26.7 C Santiago St/Civic Center Dr AWSC 12.3 B 13.3 B 12.8 B 13.9 B Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 11.6 B 9.8 A n/a2n/a2 n/a2n/a2 SARTC Dwy/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 9.9 A 12.5 B 10.0 A 12.7 B Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC >50 F >50 F >50 F >50 F
I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 26.0 C 26.6 C 26.3 C 26.8 C Notes:

AWSC – all-way stop controlled intersection; TWSC – two-way stop controlled intersection; Delay expressed in seconds Bold denotes unacceptable LOS
1 ICU reported for all signalized locations, except Caltrans facilities. Delay (reported in seconds per vehicle) is reported for all unsignalized intersections and Caltrans facilities. For AWSC, the average delay is calculated whereas for TWSC, the delay of the worst approach is calculated.
2 Intersection would be closed as part of the project
As shown in Table 9-1, all study area intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS with addition of the project with the exception of:
x Fuller Street/Santa Ana Boulevard: Continues to operate at LOS F in both the AM and PM peak hours
However, this location would operate at LOS F without the project; as such, the additional delay (less than the 1% threshold of significance) with the project would not constitute a significant impact.

As previously discussed, this location does not meet the signal warrant criteria under Opening Year (2016) conditions. Since the project would not add any traffic to the minor street approach (Fuller Street), a traffic signal would still not be warranted under Opening Year (2016) plus Project conditions.

At all other locations, the project would result in minimal changes to the ICU values (none in excess of the 0.010 ICU threshold) or the average delays (1% of delay) per vehicle.

Increases to the intersections of Santiago Street/Civic Center Drive and Santiago Street/Santa Ana Boulevard would be attributed the redistribution of traffic due to the closure of Logan Street. Overall, the project would not result in any significant traffic impacts under Opening Year (2016) plus Project conditions.

Access to the current train station and the Fuller Street-Fruit/Santa Ana Boulevard intersection would not be affected by the addition of the project to Opening Year (2016) conditions.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 290 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

9.0 FUTURE YEAR PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS
This section analyzes the geometric improvements as part of the project, coupled with the redistribution of traffic due to the termination of Logan Street under Future Year (2035) traffic conditions. Figure 9 shows the resulting Future Year (2035) AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study area intersections.

9.1 Future Year Plus Project Levels of Service
A level of service analysis was conducted to evaluate Future Year (2035) intersection operating conditions during the AM and PM peak hours with the proposed project. Table 10-1 summarizes the existing level of service at the study area intersections. Level of service calculation worksheets are included in Appendix I.

Table 10-1 Future Year plus Project Intersection LOS
Future Year (2035) Future Year + Project
Intersection
Traffic
Control
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour

ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS
Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 0.771 C 0.774 C 0.771 C 0.773 C Santiago St/Civic Center Dr Signal 0.559 A 0.610 B 0.565 A 0.619 B Delay LOS Delay LOS LOS LOS Delay LOS
Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 32.1 C 37.8 D 32.1 C 37.8 D Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 12.9 B 10.7 B n/a2n/a2 n/a2n/a2 SARTC Dwy/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC 9.7 A 14.7 B 9.7 A 14.7 B Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd TWSC >50 F >50 F >50 F >50 F
I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd Signal 31.7 C 30.7 C 31.8 C 30.7 C Notes:

AWSC – all-way stop controlled intersection; TWSC – two-way stop controlled intersection; Delay expressed in seconds Bold denotes unacceptable LOS
1 ICU reported for all signalized locations, except Caltrans facilities. Delay (reported in seconds per vehicle) is reported for all unsignalized intersections and Caltrans facilities. For AWSC, the average delay is calculated whereas for TWSC, the delay of the worst approach is calculated.
2 Intersection would be closed as part of the project
As shown in Table 10-1, all study area intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS with addition of the project with the exception of:
x Fuller Street/Santa Ana Boulevard: Continues to operate at LOS F in both the AM and PM peak hours
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 291 5/5/2026

CIVIC CENTER DR

SANTIAGO ST

POINSETTIA ST

GARFIELD ST

SANTA ANA

BOULEVARD

STAFFORD ST

LINCOLN AV

LOGAN ST

FULLER ST

EASTWOOD AV

GRAND AV

CHESTER ST
E. WASHINGTON AV

FRUIT ST
6TH ST
6TH ST
5 N
Santa Ana Bl
Santiago St
Santa Ana Bl
Grand Av
Santa Ana Bl
Fuller St
Santa Ana Bl
I-5 SB Ramps
Civic Center Dr
Santiago St
Santa Ana Bl
Logan St
Santa Ana Bl
Transit Center driveway
LEGEND
Study IntersectionAM(PM) Peak HourTraffic Volumes
581 (1607)
39 (37)
35 (109)
1210 (1070)
1102 (1644)
0 (0)
1665 (1045)
412 (968)861 (909)
133 (193)
489 (388) 383 (245) 1521 (1001)
150 (338)
56 (68)
199 (404)
5 (7)
700 (492)
117 (71)
45 (39)
441 (557)
235 (89) 20 (21)
64 (19)
80 (31)
171 (215)
584 (1111)
30 (42)
406 (362)
252 (264)
328 (190)
111 (171)
223 (249)
60 (72) 463 (264)
1078 (654)
135 (134)
4 (8)
1070 (1619)
28 (17)
1 (18)
0 (1)
1 (7)
26 (92)
0 (0)
25 (27)
7 (3)
1611 (1176)
36 (16)
431 (486)201 (468)608 (418)
77(215)
236 (171)
1218 (670)
1782 (917)
106 (225)
1091 (2298)
40 (93)
39 (109)353 (187)18 (87)
0 (0)
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Figure 9
Future Year (2035) Plus Project Traffic Volumes
2035 + project volumes.ai
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 292 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

However, this location would operate at LOS F without the project; as such, the additional delay (less than the 1% threshold of significance) with the project would not constitute a significant impact.

As previously discussed, this location does not meet the signal warrant criteria under Future Year (2035) conditions. Since the project would not add any traffic to the minor street approach (Fuller Street), a traffic signal would still not be warranted under Future Year (2035) plus Project conditions.

At all other locations, the project would result in minimal changes to the ICU values (none greater than the 0.010 ICU threshold) or the average delays (less than 1%) per vehicle.

Overall, the project would not result in any significant traffic impacts under Future Year (2035) plus Project conditions.

Access to the new SARTC and the Fuller-Fruit/Santa Ana Boulevard intersection would not be affected by the addition of the project to Future Year (2035) conditions.

10.0 CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS
This section analyzes the potential impacts during construction of the proposed project.

Construction of the proposed project could temporarily reduce the through capacity of Santa Ana Boulevard from a six-lane cross-section to a four-lane cross-section (reduction of two lanes of capacity, one lane in each direction). To determine the effect of this temporary reduction in capacity, a roadway segment analysis was conducted for Santa Ana Boulevard.

10.1 Santa Ana Boulevard Capacity Analysis
A daily roadway capacity level of service analysis was conducted utilizing average daily traffic (ADT) during Opening Year (2016) conditions. For purposes of this analysis, the segment along Santa Ana Boulevard (from Santiago Street to west of the I-5 freeway) was selected to identify potential impacts due to a reduction in capacity during construction.

The first phase of construction involves shifting Santa Ana Boulevard south of its current alignment between Santiago Street and Fuller Street-Fruit Street. During this phase, four travel lanes (two in each direction) would be provided, thereby reducing the existing capacity by two lanes (currently a six-lane cross-section), for a duration of approximately 12 months.

The second and final phase of construction would require complete closure of the eastbound direction of Santa Ana Boulevard. Eastbound traffic would be detoured south of the existing Santa Ana Boulevard alignment and connect to Fruit Street via a temporary two-lane roadway between Santiago Street and Fruit Street. Two westbound travel lanes will also be maintained. This second phase would occur over a short three-month span.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 293 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

Therefore, under each phase of construction, four travel lanes will be maintained (two on Santa Ana Boulevard, and two on Fruit Street). Figures of both phases of construction, showing the proposed detour configurations are provided in Appendix J.

The existing ADT reported in the Transit Zoning Code EIR Traffic Study for this segment was grown by 0.5 percent per year to estimate Opening Year (2016) ADT. Per the City’s significance criteria, roadway segments are compared to LOS E capacities reflected in the General Plan Circulation Element. Table 11-1 summarizes the results of the roadway segment analysis.

Table 11-1 Santa Ana Boulevard Roadway Segment Analysis Roadway From To
Opening Year
(2016) ADT1
# of
Lanes
LOS E
Capacity2LOS3
Opening Year (2016)
Santa Ana Blvd Santiago St I-5 Freeway 20,093 6 56,300 A Opening Year (2016) during Construction (reduction of two travel lanes) Santa Ana Blvd Santiago St I-5 Freeway 20,093 4 37,500 A Notes:
1 Opening Year ADT referenced from existing ADT from Transit Zoning Code EIR Traffic Study, grown to year 2016 2 LOS E Capacity referenced from City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element 3 LOS determined by assigning a letter grade based on the numerical value of the volume-to-capacity ratio.

As shown in Table 11-1, a reduction from six lanes to four lanes during construction of the proposed project would not impact operations of Santa Ana Boulevard based on ADT.

10.2 Alternative Route Capacity Analysis
Since the analysis indicates that the detour route would have adequate capacity to accommodate the demand, it is not anticipated that a substantial number of vehicles would shift to alternative routes. However, some vehicles may shift to upstream and downstream ramps along I-5 to avoid the construction area, and it may be advantageous from a construction phasing perspective to encourage the use of alternative routes. As such, an additional roadway segment analysis along the potential alternative routes (17th Street, Fourth Street, Grand Avenue, Penn Way) was conducted to confirm that these alternative facilities have adequate capacity to accommodate any overflow from Santa Ana Boulevard. Fourth Street and 17th Street represent parallel facilities in which eastbound and westbound traffic could utilize instead of Santa Ana Boulevard. Grand Avenue and Penn Way have ramp locations north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard in which traffic could utilize during construction. The alternative route roadway segment analysis is summarized in the Table 12-1 below.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 294 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

Table 12-1 Alternative Route Roadway Segment Analysis
Roadway From To
Opening Year
(2016) ADT1
# of
Lanes
LOS E
Capacity2LOS3
Opening Year (2016) during Construction (reduction of two travel lanes) 17th St
I-5 NB
Ramps
West of I-5
NB Ramps 46,062 6 56,300 D
17th St
I-5 NB
Ramps
East of I-5
NB Ramps 36,578 6 56,300 B
Fourth St Grand Ave Santiago St 18,243 4 37,500 A
Fourth St Grand Ave
I-5 SB
Ramp 20,683 4 37,500 A
Grand Ave Fourth St
Santa Ana
Blvd 37,650 4 37,500 F
Grand Ave
Santa Ana
Blvd 17th St 32,200 4 37,500 D
Penn Way
I-5 SB
Ramps 17th St 14,490 4 37,500 A
Penn Way
I-5 SB
Ramps
Santa Ana
Blvd 8,280 2 12,500 B
Notes:
1 Opening Year ADT referenced from existing ADT from Transit Zoning Code EIR Traffic Study, grown to year 2016 2 LOS E Capacity referenced from City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element 3 LOS determined by assigning a letter grade based on the numerical value of the volume-to-capacity ratio.

Bold denotes roadway segment operating at unacceptable LOS.

As shown in Table 12-1, all potential alternative routes have adequate capacity to handle any overflow due to construction on Santa Ana Boulevard, with the exception of Grand Avenue from Fourth Street to Santa Ana Boulevard. Appropriate notice and signage would be provided so as to discourage any traffic diversion to this location. Grand Avenue does not represent a significant alternative route as it is anticipated that vehicles would exit at either 17th Street or First-Fourth Street to avoid Santa Ana Boulevard.

11.0 TRAIN CROSSING DELAY AND SAFETY

ANALYSIS
This section of the report presents the grade crossing blockage time, delay, and safety analysis for the Santa Ana Boulevard grade crossing under existing (2011), Opening Year (2016), and Future Year (2035) no project conditions. Since the project eliminates the atgrade crossing, the analysis is not performed under “with project” conditions.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 295 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

11.1 Existing (2011) Rail-Highway Traffic Conditions

11.1.1 RAIL-HIGHWAY GRADE CROSSING DELAY
Grade crossing blockage time and delay was determined based on a maximum of 10 trains per hour during each of the peak hours, 66 trains per day and a train speed of 66 feet per second (fps), or 45 miles per hour (mph).

Table 13-1 Existing Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Delay Analysis Train Frequency
Daily Delay
(minutes/vehicle)
AM Peak Delay
(minutes/vehicle)
PM Peak Delay
(minutes/vehicle)
66 trains per day 0.10
8/10 (AM/PM) trains
per hour 0.28 0.32
As shown in Table 13-1, the highest existing peak hour delay occurs during the PM peak hour where the delay is approximately 19 seconds per vehicle during the peak hour (0.32 minutes/vehicle = 19 seconds per vehicle). On average, there would be approximately 6 seconds delay per vehicle on a 24-hour period. The rail-highway delay calculations are provided in Appendix K.

11.1.2 RAIL-HIGHWAY GRADE CROSSING SAFETY ANALYSIS
A hazard index was determined for the Santa Ana Boulevard grade crossing under existing conditions. The hazard index is based on 66 trains per day and an arterial roadway segment ADT volume of 19,607. Table 14-1 summarizes the current hazard index for existing 2011 conditions and the safety calculations are provided in Appendix L.

Table 14-1 Existing Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Safety Analysis Train Volume
(trains/day)
ADT Volume
(vehicles/day)
Hazard Index
66 19,607 142
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 296 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

11.2 Opening Year (2016) Rail-Highway Traffic Conditions

11.2.1 RAIL-HIGHWAY GRADE CROSSING DELAY
Grade crossing blockage time and delay was determined based on a maximum of 10 trains per hour during each of the peak hours, 71 trains per day and a train speed of 66 feet per second (fps), or 45 miles per hour (mph).

Table 15-1 Opening Year (2016) Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Delay Analysis Train Frequency
Daily Delay
(minutes/vehicle)
AM Peak Delay
(minutes/vehicle)
PM Peak Delay
(minutes/vehicle
71 trains per day 0.13
8/10 (AM/PM) trains
per hour 0.34 0.41
As shown in Table 15-1, the highest existing peak hour delay occurs during the PM peak hour where the delay is approximately 25 seconds per vehicle during the peak hour (0.41 minutes/vehicle = 25 seconds per vehicle). On average, there would be approximately 8 seconds delay per vehicle on a 24-hour period. The rail-highway delay calculations are provided in Appendix K.

11.2.2 RAIL-HIGHWAY GRADE CROSSING SAFETY ANALYSIS
A hazard index was determined for the Santa Ana Boulevard grade crossing under Opening Year (2016) conditions. The hazard index is based on 71 trains per day and an arterial roadway segment ADT volume of 20,092. Table 16-1 summarizes the current hazard index for Opening Year (2016) conditions and the safety calculations are provided in Appendix L.

Table 16-1 Opening Year (2016) Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Safety Analysis Train Volume
(trains/day)
ADT Volume
(vehicles/day) Hazard Index
71 20,092 157
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 297 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

11.3 Future Year (2035) Rail-Highway Traffic Conditions

11.3.1 RAIL-HIGHWAY GRADE CROSSING DELAY
Grade crossing blockage time and delay was determined based on a maximum of 10 trains per hour during each of the peak hours, 105 trains per day and a train speed of 66 feet per second (fps), or 45 miles per hour (mph).

Table 17-1 Future Year (2035) Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Delay Analysis Train Frequency
Daily Delay
(minutes/vehicle)
AM Peak Delay
(minutes/vehicle)
PM Peak Delay
(minutes/vehicle
105 trains per day 0.20
8/10 (AM/PM) trains
per hour 0.43 0.48
As shown in Table 17-1, the highest existing peak hour delay occurs during the PM peak hour where the delay is approximately 29 seconds per vehicle during the peak hour (0.48 minutes/vehicle = 29 seconds per vehicle). On average, there would be approximately 12 seconds delay per vehicle on a 24-hour period. The rail-highway delay calculations are provided in Appendix K.

11.3.2 RAIL-HIGHWAY GRADE CROSSING SAFETY ANALYSIS
A hazard index was determined for the Santa Ana Boulevard grade crossing under Future Year (2035) conditions. The hazard index is based on 66 trains per day and an arterial roadway segment ADT volume of 30,916. Table 18-1 summarizes the current hazard index for Future Year (2035) conditions and the safety calculations are provided in Appendix L.

Table 18-1 Future Year (2035) Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Safety Analysis Train Volume
(trains/day)
ADT Volume
(vehicles/day) Hazard Index
105 30,916 357
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 298 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

11.4 CPUC Priority Index Number
This section describes the CPUC grade separation priority list methods that attempt to quantify the benefits of eliminating train-vehicle accidents, along with the benefits of eliminating delay.

Each year, the CTC allocates $15 million in state grade separation funds under Section 190 of the Streets and Highways Code. The CPUC ranks and prioritizes projects through the submittal of applications by project sponsors and technical evaluation of projects by CPUC staff, followed by hearings on a bi-annual basis. The bi-annual proceeding, or investigation, by CPUC produces a ranking of submitted projects. Caltrans’ Division of Rail administers the funds for the CTC through a second application process, under Streets and Highway Code §§ 2450 – 2499.

Since 1957, CPUC has used numeric formulae or priority list formulas to rank and prioritize grade crossing projects. The first formula applied to grade crossing separation and elimination projects; a second is used to evaluate proposals for alternation or reconstruction of existing grade separations. These formulae have evolved through the years through the investigation process. Project proponents have the opportunity of suggesting changes to the formulae during the bi-annual CPUC investigations. The formulae have also been modified by statute and State Supreme Court order. As a result of regular testing of the formulae through these public processes, they have gained general acceptance as programming tools.

Santa Ana Boulevard grade crossing was evaluated with the formula for grade crossing separation or elimination. The Priority Index number is shown in Table 19-1 and the calculations are provided in Appendix M.

Table 19-1 CPUC Priority Index Number
Street Crossing No. Area Priority Index
Number
Santa Ana Blvd 026702V Santa Ana/Orange
County
1056.2
It should be noted that the daily traffic and train volumes and accident history are the dominant factors in the CPUC’s priority index number formula. Other special conditions factors such as school buses, hazardous material trucks, community impact, and blocking delay are minor in comparison.

12.0 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results of the level of service analysis, the proposed grade separation project and associated improvements can be implemented without significantly impacting any of the study area intersections or roadway segments.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 299 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

The proposed project would provide a net benefit by reducing the congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard caused by daily OCTA Metrolink train crossings by removing the existing at-grade conflict between vehicular traffic and rail traffic. Traffic diversions due to the termination of Logan Street north of Santa Ana Boulevard would not cause an appreciable increase to ICU or delay at any of the study area intersections.

Furthermore, evaluation of roadway segment conditions during construction showed that a reduction in capacity during construction would not cause any impacts to Santa Ana Boulevard between Santiago Street and the I-5 Freeway. The roadway segment analysis for alternative routes during construction showed that alternative facilities surrounding the project area could accommodate a shift in traffic due to the construction activities along Santa Ana Boulevard, with the exception of Grand Avenue between Fourth Street and Santa Ana Boulevard.

The evaluation of rail-highway delay and safety substantiated the overall benefit and need of the proposed grade separation. With the proposed grade separation, the delays and queues caused by train operations would no longer occur.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 300 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

APPENDIX A

EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNT DATA
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 301 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNASACCAM
Site Code : 00000155
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 1
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Santiago Street
E/W: Civic Center Drive
Weather: Sunny
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Santiago Street
Southbound
Civic Center Drive
Westbound
Santiago Street
Northbound
Civic Center Drive
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 1 37 9 47 4 7 6 17 24 16 1 41 8 4 26 38 143
07:15 AM 1 52 8 61 12 7 1 20 29 22 4 55 20 12 19 51 187 07:30 AM 0 55 8 63 15 11 4 30 36 25 3 64 23 11 41 75 232 07:45 AM 0 59 15 74 13 17 1 31 56 40 4 100 30 12 47 89 294 Total 2 203 40 245 44 42 12 98 145 103 12 260 81 39 133 253 856 08:00 AM 1 50 16 67 7 10 1 18 32 36 3 71 27 8 41 76 232 08:15 AM 1 33 9 43 2 6 0 8 32 20 4 56 17 10 30 57 164
08:30 AM 0 31 8 39 3 3 3 9 28 17 1 46 7 4 23 34 128
08:45 AM 0 32 13 45 2 5 1 8 21 14 3 38 14 1 15 30 121
Total 2 146 46 194 14 24 5 43 113 87 11 211 65 23 109 197 645 Grand Total 4 349 86 439 58 66 17 141 258 190 23 471 146 62 242 450 1501 Apprch % 0.9 79.5 19.6 41.1 46.8 12.1 54.8 40.3 4.9 32.4 13.8 53.8 Total % 0.3 23.3 5.7 29.2 3.9 4.4 1.1 9.4 17.2 12.7 1.5 31.4 9.7 4.1 16.1 30 Santiago Street
Southbound
Civic Center Drive
Westbound
Santiago Street
Northbound
Civic Center Drive
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 1 52 8 61 12 7 1 20 29 22 4 55 20 12 19 51 187 07:30 AM 0 55 8 63 15 11 4 30 36 25 3 64 23 11 41 75 232 07:45 AM 0 59 15 74 13 17 1 31 56 40 4 100 30 12 47 89 294 08:00 AM 1 50 16 67 7 10 1 18 32 36 3 71 27 8 41 76 232 Total Volume 2 216 47 265 47 45 7 99 153 123 14 290 100 43 148 291 945 % App. Total 0.8 81.5 17.7 47.5 45.5 7.1 52.8 42.4 4.8 34.4 14.8 50.9 PHF .500 .915 .734 .895 .783 .662 .438 .798 .683 .769 .875 .725 .833 .896 .787 .817 .804 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 302 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNASACCAM
Site Code : 00000155
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 2
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Santiago Street
E/W: Civic Center Drive
Weather: Sunny
Santiago Street
Civic Center Drive
Civic Center Drive
Santiago Street
Right
47 Thru
216
Left
2 Out In Total
230 265 495
Right
7 Thru
45 Left
47 Out Total In
59 99 158
Left
153
Thru
123
Right
14 Out In Total
411 290 701
Left
100
Thru
43 Right
148
Total Out In
245 291 536
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM
+0 mins. 1 52 8 61 12 7 1 20 36 25 3 64 23 11 41 75
+15 mins. 0 55 8 63 15 11 4 30 56 40 4 100 30 12 47 89
+30 mins. 0 59 15 74 13 17 1 31 32 36 3 71 27 8 41 76
+45 mins. 1 50 16 67 7 10 1 18 32 20 4 56 17 10 30 57
Total Volume 2 216 47 265 47 45 7 99 156 121 14 291 97 41 159 297 % App. Total 0.8 81.5 17.7 47.5 45.5 7.1 53.6 41.6 4.8 32.7 13.8 53.5 PHF .500 .915 .734 .895 .783 .662 .438 .798 .696 .756 .875 .728 .808 .854 .846 .834 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 303 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNASACCPM
Site Code : 00000155
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 1
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Santiago Street
E/W: Civic Center Drive
Weather: Sunny
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Santiago Street
Southbound
Civic Center Drive
Westbound
Santiago Street
Northbound
Civic Center Drive
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 1 30 1 32 1 3 5 9 11 45 3 59 27 6 49 82 182
04:15 PM 2 40 9 51 1 6 4 11 13 43 1 57 39 12 33 84 203
04:30 PM 3 30 5 38 2 2 4 8 22 30 2 54 48 10 54 112 212
04:45 PM 1 42 8 51 1 1 3 5 15 41 8 64 42 8 74 124 244
Total 7 142 23 172 5 12 16 33 61 159 14 234 156 36 210 402 841 05:00 PM 1 34 10 45 1 3 3 7 21 54 0 75 82 15 74 171 298 05:15 PM 1 46 14 61 3 6 2 11 13 34 5 52 66 14 57 137 261 05:30 PM 1 36 6 43 6 1 2 9 8 40 2 50 44 15 52 111 213
05:45 PM 1 36 9 46 3 1 1 5 12 34 5 51 29 9 37 75 177
Total 4 152 39 195 13 11 8 32 54 162 12 228 221 53 220 494 949 Grand Total 11 294 62 367 18 23 24 65 115 321 26 462 377 89 430 896 1790 Apprch % 3 80.1 16.9 27.7 35.4 36.9 24.9 69.5 5.6 42.1 9.9 48 Total % 0.6 16.4 3.5 20.5 1 1.3 1.3 3.6 6.4 17.9 1.5 25.8 21.1 5 24 50.1 Santiago Street
Southbound
Civic Center Drive
Westbound
Santiago Street
Northbound
Civic Center Drive
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 1 42 8 51 1 1 3 5 15 41 8 64 42 8 74 124 244
05:00 PM 1 34 10 45 1 3 3 7 21 54 0 75 82 15 74 171 298 05:15 PM 1 46 14 61 3 6 2 11 13 34 5 52 66 14 57 137 261 05:30 PM 1 36 6 43 6 1 2 9 8 40 2 50 44 15 52 111 213
Total Volume 4 158 38 200 11 11 10 32 57 169 15 241 234 52 257 543 1016 % App. Total 2 79 19 34.4 34.4 31.2 23.7 70.1 6.2 43.1 9.6 47.3 PHF 1.000 .859 .679 .820 .458 .458 .833 .727 .679 .782 .469 .803 .713 .867 .868 .794 .852 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 304 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNASACCPM
Site Code : 00000155
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 2
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Santiago Street
E/W: Civic Center Drive
Weather: Sunny
Santiago Street
Civic Center Drive
Civic Center Drive
Santiago Street
Right
38 Thru
158
Left
4 Out In Total
413 200 613
Right
10 Thru
11 Left
11 Out Total In
71 32 103
Left
57 Thru
169
Right
15 Out In Total
426 241 667
Left
234
Thru
52 Right
257
Total Out In
106 543 649
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:45 PM 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 1 42 8 51 1 3 5 9 13 43 1 57 48 10 54 112
+15 mins. 1 34 10 45 1 6 4 11 22 30 2 54 42 8 74 124
+30 mins. 1 46 14 61 2 2 4 8 15 41 8 64 82 15 74 171
+45 mins. 1 36 6 43 1 1 3 5 21 54 0 75 66 14 57 137
Total Volume 4 158 38 200 5 12 16 33 71 168 11 250 238 47 259 544 % App. Total 2 79 19 15.2 36.4 48.5 28.4 67.2 4.4 43.8 8.6 47.6 PHF 1.000 .859 .679 .820 .625 .500 .800 .750 .807 .778 .344 .833 .726 .783 .875 .795 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 305 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNASASAAM
Site Code : 00000035
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 1
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Santiago Street
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Santiago Street
Southbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
Santiago Street
Northbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 39 15 20 74 46 149 30 225 5 5 15 25 4 73 6 83 407 07:15 AM 31 27 22 80 24 188 44 256 5 8 14 27 8 82 3 93 456 07:30 AM 57 36 25 118 26 204 55 285 3 13 14 30 3 84 3 90 523 07:45 AM 76 31 23 130 39 265 93 397 8 6 16 30 9 75 6 90 647 Total 203 109 90 402 135 806 222 1163 21 32 59 112 24 314 18 356 2033 08:00 AM 56 28 13 97 25 179 49 253 5 16 18 39 9 85 7 101 490 08:15 AM 37 15 15 67 15 162 39 216 12 11 15 38 6 57 1 64 385 08:30 AM 38 18 10 66 24 171 40 235 6 9 17 32 5 54 4 63 396 08:45 AM 24 14 14 52 32 161 26 219 7 8 13 28 7 52 4 63 362 Total 155 75 52 282 96 673 154 923 30 44 63 137 27 248 16 291 1633 Grand Total 358 184 142 684 231 1479 376 2086 51 76 122 249 51 562 34 647 3666 Apprch % 52.3 26.9 20.8 11.1 70.9 18 20.5 30.5 49 7.9 86.9 5.3 Total % 9.8 5 3.9 18.7 6.3 40.3 10.3 56.9 1.4 2.1 3.3 6.8 1.4 15.3 0.9 17.6 Santiago Street
Southbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
Santiago Street
Northbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 31 27 22 80 24 188 44 256 5 8 14 27 8 82 3 93 456 07:30 AM 57 36 25 118 26 204 55 285 3 13 14 30 3 84 3 90 523 07:45 AM 76 31 23 130 39 265 93 397 8 6 16 30 9 75 6 90 647 08:00 AM 56 28 13 97 25 179 49 253 5 16 18 39 9 85 7 101 490 Total Volume 220 122 83 425 114 836 241 1191 21 43 62 126 29 326 19 374 2116 % App. Total 51.8 28.7 19.5 9.6 70.2 20.2 16.7 34.1 49.2 7.8 87.2 5.1 PHF .724 .847 .830 .817 .731 .789 .648 .750 .656 .672 .861 .808 .806 .959 .679 .926 .818 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 306 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNASASAAM
Site Code : 00000035
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 2
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Santiago Street
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Santiago Street
Santa Ana Boulevard
Santa Ana Boulevard
Santiago Street
Right
83 Thru
122
Left
220
Out In Total
313 425 738
Right
241
Thru
836
Left
114
Out Total In
608 1191 1799
Left
21 Thru
43 Right
62 Out In Total
255 126 381
Left
29 Thru
326
Right
19 Total Out In
940 374 1314
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:45 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 31 27 22 80 24 188 44 256 8 6 16 30 8 82 3 93
+15 mins. 57 36 25 118 26 204 55 285 5 16 18 39 3 84 3 90 +30 mins. 76 31 23 130 39 265 93 397 12 11 15 38 9 75 6 90 +45 mins. 56 28 13 97 25 179 49 253 6 9 17 32 9 85 7 101 Total Volume 220 122 83 425 114 836 241 1191 31 42 66 139 29 326 19 374 % App. Total 51.8 28.7 19.5 9.6 70.2 20.2 22.3 30.2 47.5 7.8 87.2 5.1 PHF .724 .847 .830 .817 .731 .789 .648 .750 .646 .656 .917 .891 .806 .959 .679 .926 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 307 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNASASAPM
Site Code : 00000035
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 1
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Santiago Street
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Santiago Street
Southbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
Santiago Street
Northbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 56 20 7 83 24 119 38 181 3 21 11 35 7 122 5 134 433 04:15 PM 37 17 15 69 23 111 32 166 2 13 16 31 11 130 4 145 411 04:30 PM 56 17 15 88 28 120 38 186 8 17 17 42 5 156 1 162 478 04:45 PM 71 31 17 119 25 110 37 172 10 19 27 56 9 178 5 192 539 Total 220 85 54 359 100 460 145 705 23 70 71 164 32 586 15 633 1861 05:00 PM 52 45 14 111 28 106 40 174 15 25 41 81 18 220 7 245 611 05:15 PM 61 35 15 111 22 103 27 152 9 16 19 44 11 196 3 210 517 05:30 PM 60 13 15 88 23 102 28 153 6 22 17 45 3 182 5 190 476 05:45 PM 60 17 14 91 22 83 32 137 5 19 14 38 12 106 2 120 386 Total 233 110 58 401 95 394 127 616 35 82 91 208 44 704 17 765 1990 Grand Total 453 195 112 760 195 854 272 1321 58 152 162 372 76 1290 32 1398 3851 Apprch % 59.6 25.7 14.7 14.8 64.6 20.6 15.6 40.9 43.5 5.4 92.3 2.3 Total % 11.8 5.1 2.9 19.7 5.1 22.2 7.1 34.3 1.5 3.9 4.2 9.7 2 33.5 0.8 36.3 Santiago Street
Southbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
Santiago Street
Northbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 56 17 15 88 28 120 38 186 8 17 17 42 5 156 1 162 478 04:45 PM 71 31 17 119 25 110 37 172 10 19 27 56 9 178 5 192 539 05:00 PM 52 45 14 111 28 106 40 174 15 25 41 81 18 220 7 245 611 05:15 PM 61 35 15 111 22 103 27 152 9 16 19 44 11 196 3 210 517 Total Volume 240 128 61 429 103 439 142 684 42 77 104 223 43 750 16 809 2145 % App. Total 55.9 29.8 14.2 15.1 64.2 20.8 18.8 34.5 46.6 5.3 92.7 2 PHF .845 .711 .897 .901 .920 .915 .888 .919 .700 .770 .634 .688 .597 .852 .571 .826 .878 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 308 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNASASAPM
Site Code : 00000035
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 2
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Santiago Street
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Santiago Street
Santa Ana Boulevard
Santa Ana Boulevard
Santiago Street
Right
61 Thru
128
Left
240
Out In Total
262 429 691
Right
142
Thru
439
Left
103
Out Total In
1094 684 1778
Left
42 Thru
77 Right
104
Out In Total
247 223 470
Left
43 Thru
750
Right
16 Total Out In
542 809 1351
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:30 PM 04:00 PM 04:45 PM 04:45 PM
+0 mins. 56 17 15 88 24 119 38 181 10 19 27 56 9 178 5 192 +15 mins. 71 31 17 119 23 111 32 166 15 25 41 81 18 220 7 245 +30 mins. 52 45 14 111 28 120 38 186 9 16 19 44 11 196 3 210 +45 mins. 61 35 15 111 25 110 37 172 6 22 17 45 3 182 5 190 Total Volume 240 128 61 429 100 460 145 705 40 82 104 226 41 776 20 837 % App. Total 55.9 29.8 14.2 14.2 65.2 20.6 17.7 36.3 46 4.9 92.7 2.4 PHF .845 .711 .897 .901 .893 .958 .954 .948 .667 .820 .634 .698 .569 .882 .714 .854 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 309 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNALOSAAM
Site Code : 00000013
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 1
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Logan Street
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Logan Street
Southbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 3 3 209 8 217 0 119 119 339
07:15 AM 0 7 7 262 1 263 0 138 138 408
07:30 AM 0 8 8 284 2 286 0 158 158 452
07:45 AM 0 4 4 403 1 404 0 157 157 565
Total 0 22 22 1158 12 1170 0 572 572 1764
08:00 AM 0 2 2 248 4 252 0 163 163 417
08:15 AM 0 2 2 209 3 212 0 112 112 326
08:30 AM 0 3 3 236 4 240 0 115 115 358
08:45 AM 0 3 3 231 4 235 0 88 88 326
Total 0 10 10 924 15 939 0 478 478 1427
Grand Total 0 32 32 2082 27 2109 0 1050 1050 3191
Apprch % 0 100 98.7 1.3 0 100
Total % 0 1 1 65.2 0.8 66.1 0 32.9 32.9
Logan Street
Southbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 0 7 7 262 1 263 0 138 138 408
07:30 AM 0 8 8 284 2 286 0 158 158 452
07:45 AM 0 4 4 403 1 404 0 157 157 565
08:00 AM 0 2 2 248 4 252 0 163 163 417
Total Volume 0 21 21 1197 8 1205 0 616 616 1842
% App. Total 0 100 99.3 0.7 0 100
PHF .000 .656 .656 .743 .500 .746 .000 .945 .945 .815
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 310 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNALOSAAM
Site Code : 00000013
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 2
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Logan Street
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Logan Street
Santa Ana Boulevard
Santa Ana Boulevard
Right
21 Left
0 Out In Total
8 21 29
Right
8 Thru
1197
Out Total In
616 1205 1821
Left
0 Thru
616
Total Out In
1218 616 1834
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 0 3 3 262 1 263 0 138 138
+15 mins. 0 7 7 284 2 286 0 158 158
+30 mins. 0 8 8 403 1 404 0 157 157
+45 mins. 0 4 4 248 4 252 0 163 163
Total Volume 0 22 22 1197 8 1205 0 616 616
% App. Total 0 100 99.3 0.7 0 100
PHF .000 .688 .688 .743 .500 .746 .000 .945 .945
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 311 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNALOSAPM
Site Code : 00000013
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 1
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Logan Street
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Logan Street
Southbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 2 2 179 9 188 0 209 209 399
04:15 PM 0 2 2 162 5 167 0 203 203 372
04:30 PM 0 3 3 179 3 182 0 255 255 440
04:45 PM 0 0 0 173 0 173 0 287 287 460
Total 0 7 7 693 17 710 0 954 954 1671
05:00 PM 0 3 3 175 1 176 0 330 330 509
05:15 PM 0 8 8 133 4 137 0 294 294 439
05:30 PM 0 2 2 155 3 158 0 248 248 408
05:45 PM 0 2 2 129 3 132 0 219 219 353
Total 0 15 15 592 11 603 0 1091 1091 1709
Grand Total 0 22 22 1285 28 1313 0 2045 2045 3380
Apprch % 0 100 97.9 2.1 0 100
Total % 0 0.7 0.7 38 0.8 38.8 0 60.5 60.5
Logan Street
Southbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 0 3 3 179 3 182 0 255 255 440
04:45 PM 0 0 0 173 0 173 0 287 287 460
05:00 PM 0 3 3 175 1 176 0 330 330 509
05:15 PM 0 8 8 133 4 137 0 294 294 439
Total Volume 0 14 14 660 8 668 0 1166 1166 1848
% App. Total 0 100 98.8 1.2 0 100
PHF .000 .438 .438 .922 .500 .918 .000 .883 .883 .908
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 312 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNALOSAPM
Site Code : 00000013
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 2
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Logan Street
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Logan Street
Santa Ana Boulevard
Santa Ana Boulevard
Right
14 Left
0 Out In Total
8 14 22
Right
8 Thru
660
Out Total In
1166 668 1834
Left
0 1166
Thru
Total Out In
674 1166 1840
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
05:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 0 3 3 179 9 188 0 255 255
+15 mins. 0 8 8 162 5 167 0 287 287
+30 mins. 0 2 2 179 3 182 0 330 330
+45 mins. 0 2 2 173 0 173 0 294 294
Total Volume 0 15 15 693 17 710 0 1166 1166
% App. Total 0 100 97.6 2.4 0 100
PHF .000 .469 .469 .968 .472 .944 .000 .883 .883
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 313 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNADWSAAM
Site Code : 00000066
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 1
City of Santa Ana
N/S: SARTC Driveway
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
SARTC Driveway
Northbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 228 228 0 11 11 114 19 133 372
07:15 AM 0 262 262 0 9 9 121 11 132 403
07:30 AM 0 286 286 0 2 2 151 11 162 450
07:45 AM 0 405 405 0 10 10 155 4 159 574
Total 0 1181 1181 0 32 32 541 45 586 1799
08:00 AM 0 248 248 0 14 14 154 13 167 429
08:15 AM 0 219 219 0 9 9 97 7 104 332
08:30 AM 0 234 234 0 8 8 101 9 110 352
08:45 AM 0 228 228 0 12 12 78 10 88 328
Total 0 929 929 0 43 43 430 39 469 1441
Grand Total 0 2110 2110 0 75 75 971 84 1055 3240
Apprch % 0 100 0 100 92 8
Total % 0 65.1 65.1 0 2.3 2.3 30 2.6 32.6
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
SARTC Driveway
Northbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 0 262 262 0 9 9 121 11 132 403
07:30 AM 0 286 286 0 2 2 151 11 162 450
07:45 AM 0 405 405 0 10 10 155 4 159 574
08:00 AM 0 248 248 0 14 14 154 13 167 429
Total Volume 0 1201 1201 0 35 35 581 39 620 1856
% App. Total 0 100 0 100 93.7 6.3
PHF .000 .741 .741 .000 .625 .625 .937 .750 .928 .808
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 314 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNADWSAAM
Site Code : 00000066
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 2
City of Santa Ana
N/S: SARTC Driveway
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Santa Ana Boulevard
Santa Ana Boulevard
SARTC Driveway
Thru
1201
Left
0 Out Total In
616 1201 1817
Left
0 Right
35 Out In Total
39 35 74
Thru
581
Right
39 Total Out In
1201 620 1821
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:15 AM 08:00 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 0 262 262 0 14 14 121 11 132
+15 mins. 0 286 286 0 9 9 151 11 162
+30 mins. 0 405 405 0 8 8 155 4 159
+45 mins. 0 248 248 0 12 12 154 13 167
Total Volume 0 1201 1201 0 43 43 581 39 620
% App. Total 0 100 0 100 93.7 6.3
PHF .000 .741 .741 .000 .768 .768 .937 .750 .928
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 315 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNADWSAPM
Site Code : 00000066
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 1
City of Santa Ana
N/S: SARTC Driveway
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
SARTC Driveway
Northbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 173 173 0 17 17 187 10 197 387
04:15 PM 0 172 172 0 19 19 176 8 184 375
04:30 PM 0 175 175 0 19 19 231 7 238 432
04:45 PM 0 178 178 0 27 27 265 5 270 475
Total 0 698 698 0 82 82 859 30 889 1669
05:00 PM 0 169 169 0 33 33 310 9 319 521
05:15 PM 0 158 158 0 18 18 270 12 282 458
05:30 PM 0 152 152 0 16 16 241 9 250 418
05:45 PM 0 129 129 0 40 40 173 8 181 350
Total 0 608 608 0 107 107 994 38 1032 1747
Grand Total 0 1306 1306 0 189 189 1853 68 1921 3416
Apprch % 0 100 0 100 96.5 3.5
Total % 0 38.2 38.2 0 5.5 5.5 54.2 2 56.2
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
SARTC Driveway
Northbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 0 175 175 0 19 19 231 7 238 432
04:45 PM 0 178 178 0 27 27 265 5 270 475
05:00 PM 0 169 169 0 33 33 310 9 319 521
05:15 PM 0 158 158 0 18 18 270 12 282 458
Total Volume 0 680 680 0 97 97 1076 33 1109 1886
% App. Total 0 100 0 100 97 3
PHF .000 .955 .955 .000 .735 .735 .868 .688 .869 .905
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 316 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNADWSAPM
Site Code : 00000066
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 2
City of Santa Ana
N/S: SARTC Driveway
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Santa Ana Boulevard
Santa Ana Boulevard
SARTC Driveway
Thru
680
Left
0 Out Total In
1173 680 1853
Left
0 Right
97 Out In Total
33 97 130
1076
Thru Right
33 Total Out In
680 1109 1789
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:45 PM
+0 mins. 0 173 173 0 33 33 265 5 270
+15 mins. 0 172 172 0 18 18 310 9 319
+30 mins. 0 175 175 0 16 16 270 12 282
+45 mins. 0 178 178 0 40 40 241 9 250
Total Volume 0 698 698 0 107 107 1086 35 1121
% App. Total 0 100 0 100 96.9 3.1
PHF .000 .980 .980 .000 .669 .669 .876 .729 .879
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 317 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNAFUSAAM
Site Code : 00000061
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 1
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Fuller Street
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Fuller Street
Southbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
Fuller Street
Northbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 10 223 8 241 3 0 3 6 1 121 4 126 373
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 7 248 1 256 4 0 5 9 1 126 4 131 396
07:30 AM 1 0 1 2 11 289 4 304 2 0 9 11 1 140 3 144 461
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 9 376 0 385 9 0 5 14 1 159 13 173 572
Total 1 0 1 2 37 1136 13 1186 18 0 22 40 4 546 24 574 1802 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 5 235 1 241 7 0 4 11 1 158 5 164 416
08:15 AM 1 0 0 1 5 209 4 218 4 0 7 11 0 101 7 108 338
08:30 AM 0 0 1 1 3 232 2 237 5 0 8 13 2 106 5 113 364
08:45 AM 0 1 0 1 10 220 6 236 5 0 15 20 0 86 3 89 346
Total 1 1 1 3 23 896 13 932 21 0 34 55 3 451 20 474 1464 Grand Total 2 1 2 5 60 2032 26 2118 39 0 56 95 7 997 44 1048 3266 Apprch % 40 20 40 2.8 95.9 1.2 41.1 0 58.9 0.7 95.1 4.2 Total % 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 1.8 62.2 0.8 64.8 1.2 0 1.7 2.9 0.2 30.5 1.3 32.1 Fuller Street
Southbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
Fuller Street
Northbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 7 248 1 256 4 0 5 9 1 126 4 131 396
07:30 AM 1 0 1 2 11 289 4 304 2 0 9 11 1 140 3 144 461
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 9 376 0 385 9 0 5 14 1 159 13 173 572
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 5 235 1 241 7 0 4 11 1 158 5 164 416
Total Volume 1 0 1 2 32 1148 6 1186 22 0 23 45 4 583 25 612 1845 % App. Total 50 0 50 2.7 96.8 0.5 48.9 0 51.1 0.7 95.3 4.1 PHF .250 .000 .250 .250 .727 .763 .375 .770 .611 .000 .639 .804 1.000 .917 .481 .884 .806 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 318 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNAFUSAAM
Site Code : 00000061
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 2
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Fuller Street
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Fuller Street
Santa Ana Boulevard
Santa Ana Boulevard
Fuller Street
Right
1 Thru
0 Left
1 Out In Total
10 2 12
Right
6 Thru
1148
Left
32 Out Total In
607 1186 1793
Left
22 Thru
0 Right
23 Out In Total
57 45 102
Left
4 Thru
583
Right
25 Total Out In
1171 612 1783
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:30 AM 07:00 AM 08:00 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 1 0 1 2 10 223 8 241 7 0 4 11 1 126 4 131
+15 mins. 0 0 0 0 7 248 1 256 4 0 7 11 1 140 3 144
+30 mins. 0 0 0 0 11 289 4 304 5 0 8 13 1 159 13 173
+45 mins. 1 0 0 1 9 376 0 385 5 0 15 20 1 158 5 164
Total Volume 2 0 1 3 37 1136 13 1186 21 0 34 55 4 583 25 612 % App. Total 66.7 0 33.3 3.1 95.8 1.1 38.2 0 61.8 0.7 95.3 4.1 PHF .500 .000 .250 .375 .841 .755 .406 .770 .750 .000 .567 .688 1.000 .917 .481 .884 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 319 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNAFUSAPM
Site Code : 00000061
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 1
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Fuller Street
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Fuller Street
Southbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
Fuller Street
Northbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 7 0 6 13 6 166 5 177 8 0 17 25 2 209 3 214 429 04:15 PM 5 0 2 7 7 164 0 171 5 0 9 14 2 193 10 205 397
04:30 PM 7 0 2 9 6 180 1 187 9 0 33 42 2 239 4 245 483
04:45 PM 3 0 2 5 2 170 0 172 4 0 19 23 1 275 5 281 481
Total 22 0 12 34 21 680 6 707 26 0 78 104 7 916 22 945 1790 05:00 PM 4 1 0 5 2 152 2 156 6 0 15 21 2 338 3 343 525
05:15 PM 2 0 2 4 4 146 0 150 5 0 15 20 2 297 3 302 476
05:30 PM 1 0 1 2 3 150 1 154 3 0 8 11 1 250 1 252 419
05:45 PM 1 1 1 3 4 115 4 123 4 0 14 18 6 208 6 220 364
Total 8 2 4 14 13 563 7 583 18 0 52 70 11 1093 13 1117 1784 Grand Total 30 2 16 48 34 1243 13 1290 44 0 130 174 18 2009 35 2062 3574 Apprch % 62.5 4.2 33.3 2.6 96.4 1 25.3 0 74.7 0.9 97.4 1.7 Total % 0.8 0.1 0.4 1.3 1 34.8 0.4 36.1 1.2 0 3.6 4.9 0.5 56.2 1 57.7 Fuller Street
Southbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
Fuller Street
Northbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 7 0 2 9 6 180 1 187 9 0 33 42 2 239 4 245 483
04:45 PM 3 0 2 5 2 170 0 172 4 0 19 23 1 275 5 281 481
05:00 PM 4 1 0 5 2 152 2 156 6 0 15 21 2 338 3 343 525
05:15 PM 2 0 2 4 4 146 0 150 5 0 15 20 2 297 3 302 476
Total Volume 16 1 6 23 14 648 3 665 24 0 82 106 7 1149 15 1171 1965 % App. Total 69.6 4.3 26.1 2.1 97.4 0.5 22.6 0 77.4 0.6 98.1 1.3 PHF .571 .250 .750 .639 .583 .900 .375 .889 .667 .000 .621 .631 .875 .850 .750 .853 .936 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 320 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNAFUSAPM
Site Code : 00000061
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 2
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Fuller Street
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Fuller Street
Santa Ana Boulevard
Santa Ana Boulevard
Fuller Street
Right
6 Thru
1 Left
16 Out In Total
10 23 33
Right
3 Thru
648
Left
14 Out Total In
1247 665 1912
Left
24 Thru
0 Right
82 Out In Total
30 106 136
Left
7 1149
Thru Right
15 Total Out In
678 1171 1849
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM
+0 mins. 7 0 6 13 6 166 5 177 9 0 33 42 1 275 5 281
+15 mins. 5 0 2 7 7 164 0 171 4 0 19 23 2 338 3 343
+30 mins. 7 0 2 9 6 180 1 187 6 0 15 21 2 297 3 302
+45 mins. 3 0 2 5 2 170 0 172 5 0 15 20 1 250 1 252
Total Volume 22 0 12 34 21 680 6 707 24 0 82 106 6 1160 12 1178 % App. Total 64.7 0 35.3 3 96.2 0.8 22.6 0 77.4 0.5 98.5 1 PHF .786 .000 .500 .654 .750 .944 .300 .945 .667 .000 .621 .631 .750 .858 .600 .859 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 321 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNA5SSAAM
Site Code : 00000051
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 1
City of Santa Ana
N/S: I-5 Southbound Ramps
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Groups Printed- Total Volume
I-5 Southbound Ramps
Southbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 125 23 148 203 44 247 46 78 124 519
07:15 AM 102 24 126 239 48 287 39 88 127 540
07:30 AM 86 19 105 290 71 361 60 96 156 622
07:45 AM 94 25 119 357 64 421 77 106 183 723
Total 407 91 498 1089 227 1316 222 368 590 2404
08:00 AM 96 16 112 228 81 309 54 103 157 578
08:15 AM 86 21 107 201 55 256 37 75 112 475
08:30 AM 89 13 102 228 50 278 42 74 116 496
08:45 AM 131 25 156 205 34 239 45 57 102 497
Total 402 75 477 862 220 1082 178 309 487 2046
Grand Total 809 166 975 1951 447 2398 400 677 1077 4450 Apprch % 83 17 81.4 18.6 37.1 62.9
Total % 18.2 3.7 21.9 43.8 10 53.9 9 15.2 24.2
I-5 Southbound Ramps
Southbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 102 24 126 239 48 287 39 88 127 540
07:30 AM 86 19 105 290 71 361 60 96 156 622
07:45 AM 94 25 119 357 64 421 77 106 183 723
08:00 AM 96 16 112 228 81 309 54 103 157 578
Total Volume 378 84 462 1114 264 1378 230 393 623 2463
% App. Total 81.8 18.2 80.8 19.2 36.9 63.1
PHF .926 .840 .917 .780 .815 .818 .747 .927 .851 .852
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 322 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNA5SSAAM
Site Code : 00000051
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 2
City of Santa Ana
N/S: I-5 Southbound Ramps
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
I-5 Southbound Ramps
Santa Ana Boulevard
Santa Ana Boulevard
Right
84 Left
378
Out In Total
494 462 956
Right
264
Thru
1114
Out Total In
771 1378 2149
Left
230
Thru
393
Total Out In
1198 623 1821
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 125 23 148 239 48 287 39 88 127
+15 mins. 102 24 126 290 71 361 60 96 156
+30 mins. 86 19 105 357 64 421 77 106 183
+45 mins. 94 25 119 228 81 309 54 103 157
Total Volume 407 91 498 1114 264 1378 230 393 623
% App. Total 81.7 18.3 80.8 19.2 36.9 63.1
PHF .814 .910 .841 .780 .815 .818 .747 .927 .851
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 323 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNA5SSAPM
Site Code : 00000051
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 1
City of Santa Ana
N/S: I-5 Southbound Ramps
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
Groups Printed- Total Volume
I-5 Southbound Ramps
Southbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 75 23 98 168 44 212 111 134 245 555
04:15 PM 86 29 115 144 34 178 107 100 207 500
04:30 PM 82 28 110 161 50 211 150 136 286 607
04:45 PM 82 20 102 149 38 187 163 136 299 588
Total 325 100 425 622 166 788 531 506 1037 2250
05:00 PM 69 16 85 131 63 194 188 175 363 642
05:15 PM 63 19 82 130 42 172 162 161 323 577
05:30 PM 64 11 75 145 44 189 133 128 261 525
05:45 PM 68 17 85 112 39 151 120 103 223 459
Total 264 63 327 518 188 706 603 567 1170 2203
Grand Total 589 163 752 1140 354 1494 1134 1073 2207 4453 Apprch % 78.3 21.7 76.3 23.7 51.4 48.6
Total % 13.2 3.7 16.9 25.6 7.9 33.6 25.5 24.1 49.6
I-5 Southbound Ramps
Southbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Westbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 82 28 110 161 50 211 150 136 286 607
04:45 PM 82 20 102 149 38 187 163 136 299 588
05:00 PM 69 16 85 131 63 194 188 175 363 642
05:15 PM 63 19 82 130 42 172 162 161 323 577
Total Volume 296 83 379 571 193 764 663 608 1271 2414
% App. Total 78.1 21.9 74.7 25.3 52.2 47.8
PHF .902 .741 .861 .887 .766 .905 .882 .869 .875 .940
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 324 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNA5SSAPM
Site Code : 00000051
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 2
City of Santa Ana
N/S: I-5 Southbound Ramps
E/W: Santa Ana Boulevard
Weather: Sunny
I-5 Southbound Ramps
Santa Ana Boulevard
Santa Ana Boulevard
Right
83 Left
296
Out In Total
856 379 1235
Right
193
Thru
571
Out Total In
904 764 1668
Left
663
Thru
608
Total Out In
654 1271 1925
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 75 23 98 168 44 212 150 136 286
+15 mins. 86 29 115 144 34 178 163 136 299
+30 mins. 82 28 110 161 50 211 188 175 363
+45 mins. 82 20 102 149 38 187 162 161 323
Total Volume 325 100 425 622 166 788 663 608 1271
% App. Total 76.5 23.5 78.9 21.1 52.2 47.8
PHF .945 .862 .924 .926 .830 .929 .882 .869 .875
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 325 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNAGRSAAM
Site Code : 00000063
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 1
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Grand Avenue
E/W: Santa Ana Blvd - I-5 Carpool Ramps
Weather: Sunny
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Grand Avenue
Southbound
I-5 Carpool NB Off / SB On
Ramps
Westbound
Grand Avenue
Northbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 10 194 189 393 3 24 3 30 30 148 2 180 26 22 130 178 781 07:15 AM 35 248 210 493 6 43 4 53 20 198 2 220 33 31 126 190 956 07:30 AM 30 228 237 495 2 114 1 117 26 246 6 278 43 26 112 181 1071 07:45 AM 21 274 286 581 3 90 9 102 23 219 6 248 49 32 100 181 1112 Total 96 944 922 1962 14 271 17 302 99 811 16 926 151 111 468 730 3920 08:00 AM 20 276 239 535 3 28 2 33 30 181 4 215 36 31 113 180 963 08:15 AM 14 271 204 489 3 20 8 31 20 168 3 191 29 31 108 168 879 08:30 AM 10 246 228 484 4 25 6 35 18 173 0 191 29 29 105 163 873 08:45 AM 6 230 179 415 3 23 7 33 22 146 1 169 30 23 115 168 785 Total 50 1023 850 1923 13 96 23 132 90 668 8 766 124 114 441 679 3500 Grand Total 146 1967 1772 3885 27 367 40 434 189 1479 24 1692 275 225 909 1409 7420 Apprch % 3.8 50.6 45.6 6.2 84.6 9.2 11.2 87.4 1.4 19.5 16 64.5 Total % 2 26.5 23.9 52.4 0.4 4.9 0.5 5.8 2.5 19.9 0.3 22.8 3.7 3 12.3 19 Grand Avenue
Southbound
I-5 Carpool NB Off / SB On
Ramps
Westbound
Grand Avenue
Northbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 35 248 210 493 6 43 4 53 20 198 2 220 33 31 126 190 956 07:30 AM 30 228 237 495 2 114 1 117 26 246 6 278 43 26 112 181 1071 07:45 AM 21 274 286 581 3 90 9 102 23 219 6 248 49 32 100 181 1112 08:00 AM 20 276 239 535 3 28 2 33 30 181 4 215 36 31 113 180 963 Total Volume 106 1026 972 2104 14 275 16 305 99 844 18 961 161 120 451 732 4102 % App. Total 5 48.8 46.2 4.6 90.2 5.2 10.3 87.8 1.9 22 16.4 61.6 PHF .757 .929 .850 .905 .583 .603 .444 .652 .825 .858 .750 .864 .821 .938 .895 .963 .922 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 326 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNAGRSAAM
Site Code : 00000063
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 2
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Grand Avenue
E/W: Santa Ana Blvd - I-5 Carpool Ramps
Weather: Sunny
Grand Avenue
Santa Ana Boulevard
I-5 Carpool NB Off / SB On Ramps
Grand Avenue
Right
972
Thru
1026
Left
106
Out In Total
1021 2104 3125
Right
16 Thru
275
Left
14 Out Total In
244 305 549
Left
99 Thru
844
Right
18 Out In Total
1491 961 2452
Left
161
Thru
120
Right
451
Total Out In
1346 732 2078
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 35 248 210 493 6 43 4 53 20 198 2 220 33 31 126 190 +15 mins. 30 228 237 495 2 114 1 117 26 246 6 278 43 26 112 181 +30 mins. 21 274 286 581 3 90 9 102 23 219 6 248 49 32 100 181 +45 mins. 20 276 239 535 3 28 2 33 30 181 4 215 36 31 113 180 Total Volume 106 1026 972 2104 14 275 16 305 99 844 18 961 161 120 451 732 % App. Total 5 48.8 46.2 4.6 90.2 5.2 10.3 87.8 1.9 22 16.4 61.6 PHF .757 .929 .850 .905 .583 .603 .444 .652 .825 .858 .750 .864 .821 .938 .895 .963 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 327 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNAGRSAPM
Site Code : 00000063
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 1
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Grand Avenue
E/W: Santa Ana Blvd - I-5 Carpool Ramps
Weather: Sunny
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Grand Avenue
Southbound
I-5 Carpool NB Off / SB On
Ramps
Westbound
Grand Avenue
Northbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 4 127 124 255 8 55 9 72 31 312 2 345 74 27 91 192 864 04:15 PM 2 126 94 222 9 46 11 66 43 331 6 380 59 24 103 186 854 04:30 PM 3 105 99 207 8 59 10 77 40 277 0 317 97 29 100 226 827 04:45 PM 8 148 101 257 6 56 13 75 49 328 4 381 66 29 109 204 917 Total 17 506 418 941 31 216 43 290 163 1248 12 1423 296 109 403 808 3462 05:00 PM 8 122 107 237 7 34 17 58 47 403 8 458 80 90 68 238 991 05:15 PM 13 153 88 254 6 40 13 59 32 380 3 415 66 63 76 205 933 05:30 PM 9 156 88 253 9 43 22 74 37 360 5 402 66 32 94 192 921 05:45 PM 14 142 89 245 9 28 13 50 34 430 3 467 57 22 85 164 926 Total 44 573 372 989 31 145 65 241 150 1573 19 1742 269 207 323 799 3771 Grand Total 61 1079 790 1930 62 361 108 531 313 2821 31 3165 565 316 726 1607 7233 Apprch % 3.2 55.9 40.9 11.7 68 20.3 9.9 89.1 1 35.2 19.7 45.2 Total % 0.8 14.9 10.9 26.7 0.9 5 1.5 7.3 4.3 39 0.4 43.8 7.8 4.4 10 22.2 Grand Avenue
Southbound
I-5 Carpool NB Off / SB On
Ramps
Westbound
Grand Avenue
Northbound
Santa Ana Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 8 122 107 237 7 34 17 58 47 403 8 458 80 90 68 238 991 05:15 PM 13 153 88 254 6 40 13 59 32 380 3 415 66 63 76 205 933 05:30 PM 9 156 88 253 9 43 22 74 37 360 5 402 66 32 94 192 921 05:45 PM 14 142 89 245 9 28 13 50 34 430 3 467 57 22 85 164 926 Total Volume 44 573 372 989 31 145 65 241 150 1573 19 1742 269 207 323 799 3771 % App. Total 4.4 57.9 37.6 12.9 60.2 27 8.6 90.3 1.1 33.7 25.9 40.4 PHF .786 .918 .869 .973 .861 .843 .739 .814 .798 .915 .594 .933 .841 .575 .859 .839 .951 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 328 5/5/2026
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : SNAGRSAPM
Site Code : 00000063
Start Date : 5/11/2011
Page No : 2
City of Santa Ana
N/S: Grand Avenue
E/W: Santa Ana Blvd - I-5 Carpool Ramps
Weather: Sunny
Grand Avenue
Santa Ana Boulevard
I-5 Carpool NB Off / SB On Ramps
Grand Avenue
Right
372
Thru
573
Left
44 Out In Total
1907 989 2896
Right
65 Thru
145
Left
31 Out Total In
270 241 511
Left
150
Thru
1573
Right
19 Out In Total
927 1742 2669
Left
269
Thru
207
Right
323
Total Out In
667 799 1466
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:45 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 8 148 101 257 8 55 9 72 47 403 8 458 97 29 100 226 +15 mins. 8 122 107 237 9 46 11 66 32 380 3 415 66 29 109 204 +30 mins. 13 153 88 254 8 59 10 77 37 360 5 402 80 90 68 238 +45 mins. 9 156 88 253 6 56 13 75 34 430 3 467 66 63 76 205 Total Volume 38 579 384 1001 31 216 43 290 150 1573 19 1742 309 211 353 873 % App. Total 3.8 57.8 38.4 10.7 74.5 14.8 8.6 90.3 1.1 35.4 24.2 40.4 PHF .731 .928 .897 .974 .861 .915 .827 .942 .798 .915 .594 .933 .796 .586 .810 .917 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 329 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

APPENDIX B

EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 330 5/5/2026
Existing AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:38:54 Page 2-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Santiago St/Civic Center Dr
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.447
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 11.4
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: B
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Civic Center Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 153 123 14 2 216 47 100 43 148 47 45 7
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 153 123 14 2 216 47 100 43 148 47 45 7
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 153 123 14 2 216 47 100 43 148 47 45 7
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 153 123 14 2 216 47 100 43 148 47 45 7
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 153 123 14 2 216 47 100 43 148 47 45 7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.90 0.10 1.00 0.82 0.18 0.70 0.30 1.00 0.48 0.45 0.07 Final Sat.: 536 525 60 530 483 105 367 158 620 243 232 36 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.29 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.27 0.27 0.24 0.19 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 11.6 10.3 10.3 9.2 12.9 12.9 11.5 11.5 9.8 11.0 11.0 11.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 11.6 10.3 10.3 9.2 12.9 12.9 11.5 11.5 9.8 11.0 11.0 11.0 LOS by Move: B B B A B B B B A B B B
ApproachDel: 11.0 12.9 10.6 11.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: 11.0 12.9 10.6 11.0
LOS by Appr: B B B B
AllWayAvgQ: 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 331 5/5/2026
Existing AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:38:54 Page 3-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.479
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 23 Level Of Service: A
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 21 43 62 220 122 83 29 326 19 114 836 241
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 21 43 62 220 122 83 29 326 19 114 836 241
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 21 43 62 220 122 83 29 326 19 114 836 241
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 21 43 62 220 122 83 29 326 19 114 836 241
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 21 43 62 220 122 83 29 326 19 114 836 241
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 3213 187 1700 3400 1700 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.13 0.07 0.05 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.25 0.14 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 332 5/5/2026
Existing AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:38:55 Page 4-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.2] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Logan St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 616 0 0 1197 8
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 616 0 0 1197 8
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 616 0 0 1197 8
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 616 0 0 1197 8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 403 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 603 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 603 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 11.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * B * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 11.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * B * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 333 5/5/2026
Existing AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:38:55 Page 5-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SARTC Drwy/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SARTC Drwy Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 581 39 0 1201 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 581 39 0 1201 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 581 39 0 1201 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 581 39 0 1201 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 213 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 798 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 798 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 9.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * A * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 9.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: A * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 334 5/5/2026
Existing AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:38:55 Page 6-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[ 55.0] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Fuller St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 22 0 23 1 0 1 4 583 25 32 1148 6
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 22 0 23 1 0 1 4 583 25 32 1148 6
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 22 0 23 1 0 1 4 583 25 32 1148 6
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 22 0 23 1 0 1 4 583 25 32 1148 6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 1819 1822 596 1830 1831 1151 1154 xxxx xxxxx 608 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 61 78 508 60 77 243 613 xxxx xxxxx 980 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 59 75 508 55 74 243 613 xxxx xxxxx 980 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.38 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 12.4 xxxxx xxxx 19.9 10.9 xxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * C B * * A * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 59 xxxx xxxxx 55 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 1.4 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 99.5 xxxx xxxxx 71.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: F * * F * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 55.0 45.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F E * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 335 5/5/2026
Existing AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:38:55 Page 7-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.520
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 25.5
Optimal Cycle: 42 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: I-5 SB Ramps Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 378 0 84 230 393 0 0 1114 264
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 378 0 84 230 393 0 0 1114 264
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 378 0 84 230 393 0 0 1114 264
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 378 0 84 230 393 0 0 1114 264
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 378 0 84 230 393 0 0 1114 264
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.43 0.57 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 3502 0 1615 3502 5187 0 0 4072 965
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.27 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.53 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.25 0.45 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.9 0.0 33.5 39.7 40.1 0.0 0.0 15.6 15.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.9 0.0 33.5 39.7 40.1 0.0 0.0 15.6 15.6 LOS by Move: A A A D A C D D A A B B
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 6 0 2 3 4 0 0 10 10
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 336 5/5/2026
MITIG8 - Existing AM Thu May 3, 2012 10:32:00 Page 1-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.728
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.1
Optimal Cycle: 63 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Grand Ave Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 99 844 18 106 1026 972 161 120 451 14 275 16
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 99 844 18 106 1026 972 161 120 451 14 275 16 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 99 844 18 106 1026 972 161 120 451 14 275 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 99 844 18 106 1026 972 161 120 451 14 275 16 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 99 844 18 106 1026 972 161 120 451 14 275 16 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 99 844 18 106 1026 972 161 120 451 14 275 16 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.75 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 2.94 0.06 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.09 1.81 0.10 Final Sat.: 1805 5063 108 1805 3610 2842 3502 1900 2842 164 3222 187 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.17 0.17 0.06 0.28 0.34 0.05 0.06 0.16 0.09 0.09 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.08 0.40 0.40 0.14 0.47 0.47 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.12 0.12 0.12 Volume/Cap: 0.73 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.61 0.73 0.21 0.29 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 Delay/Veh: 63.2 21.5 21.5 40.2 20.3 23.4 32.2 33.0 40.7 48.9 48.9 48.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 63.2 21.5 21.5 40.2 20.3 23.4 32.2 33.0 40.7 48.9 48.9 48.9 LOS by Move: E C C D C C C C D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 7 7 3 13 15 2 3 7 6 6 6
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 337 5/5/2026
Existing PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:46:15 Page 2-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Santiago St/Civic Center Dr
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.507
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.3
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: B
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Civic Center Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 57 169 15 4 158 38 234 52 257 11 11 10
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 169 15 4 158 38 234 52 257 11 11 10
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 57 169 15 4 158 38 234 52 257 11 11 10
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 57 169 15 4 158 38 234 52 257 11 11 10
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 57 169 15 4 158 38 234 52 257 11 11 10
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.92 0.08 1.00 0.81 0.19 0.82 0.18 1.00 0.35 0.34 0.31 Final Sat.: 510 511 45 502 449 108 462 103 681 179 179 163 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.51 0.51 0.38 0.06 0.06 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 10.3 11.7 11.7 9.6 12.0 12.0 14.9 14.9 10.7 9.8 9.8 9.8 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 10.3 11.7 11.7 9.6 12.0 12.0 14.9 14.9 10.7 9.8 9.8 9.8 LOS by Move: B B B A B B B B B A A A
ApproachDel: 11.4 11.9 12.9 9.8
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: 11.4 11.9 12.9 9.8
LOS by Appr: B B B A
AllWayAvgQ: 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 338 5/5/2026
Existing PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:46:27 Page 3-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.538
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: A
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 42 77 104 240 128 61 43 750 16 103 439 142
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 42 77 104 240 128 61 43 750 16 103 439 142 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 42 77 104 240 128 61 43 750 16 103 439 142
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 42 77 104 240 128 61 43 750 16 103 439 142 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 42 77 104 240 128 61 43 750 16 103 439 142 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 3329 71 1700 3400 1700 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.14 0.08 0.04 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.13 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 339 5/5/2026
Existing PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:46:37 Page 4-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Logan St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1166 0 0 660 8
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1166 0 0 660 8
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1166 0 0 660 8
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1166 0 0 660 8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 224 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 786 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 786 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * A * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 9.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * A * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 340 5/5/2026
Existing PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:46:52 Page 5-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SARTC Drwy/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.8] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SARTC Drwy Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 1076 33 0 680 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 1076 33 0 680 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 1076 33 0 680 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 1076 33 0 680 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 375 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 628 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 628 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.15 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.5 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 11.8 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 11.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: B * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 341 5/5/2026
Existing PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:46:56 Page 6-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 4.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[132.0] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Fuller St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 24 0 82 16 1 6 7 1149 15 14 648 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 24 0 82 16 1 6 7 1149 15 14 648 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 24 0 82 16 1 6 7 1149 15 14 648 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 24 0 82 16 1 6 7 1149 15 14 648 3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 1852 1850 1157 1889 1856 650 651 xxxx xxxxx 1164 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 58 75 241 54 75 473 945 xxxx xxxxx 607 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 55 73 241 35 72 473 945 xxxx xxxxx 607 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.44 0.00 0.34 0.46 0.01 0.01 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 1.4 xxxx xxxx 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 27.4 xxxxx xxxx 12.7 8.8 xxxx xxxxx 11.1 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * D * * B A * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 55 xxxx xxxxx 36 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 1.6 xxxx xxxxx 1.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:114.0 xxxx xxxxx 174.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: F * * F * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 47.0 132.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: E F * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 342 5/5/2026
Existing PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:47:01 Page 7-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.485
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.4
Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: I-5 SB Ramps Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 296 0 83 663 608 0 0 571 193
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 296 0 83 663 608 0 0 571 193
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 296 0 83 663 608 0 0 571 193
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 296 0 83 663 608 0 0 571 193
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 296 0 83 663 608 0 0 571 193
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.24 0.76 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 3502 0 1615 3502 5187 0 0 3729 1261
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.05 0.19 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.29 0.49 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.49 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.9 0.0 36.5 23.2 21.1 0.0 0.0 27.9 27.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.9 0.0 36.5 23.2 21.1 0.0 0.0 27.9 27.9 LOS by Move: A A A D A D C C A A C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 5 0 2 8 4 0 0 7 7
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 343 5/5/2026
MITIG8 - Existing PM Thu May 3, 2012 10:35:54 Page 1-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.586
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 25.7
Optimal Cycle: 47 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Grand Ave Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 150 1573 19 44 573 372 269 207 323 31 145 65
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 150 1573 19 44 573 372 269 207 323 31 145 65 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 150 1573 19 44 573 372 269 207 323 31 145 65 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 150 1573 19 44 573 372 269 207 323 31 145 65 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 150 1573 19 44 573 372 269 207 323 31 145 65 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 150 1573 19 44 573 372 269 207 323 31 145 65 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.75 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.91 0.91 0.91 Lanes: 1.00 2.96 0.04 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.26 1.20 0.54 Final Sat.: 1805 5115 62 1805 3610 2842 3502 1900 2842 443 2073 929 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.02 0.16 0.13 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.07 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.52 0.52 0.04 0.37 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.12 0.12 Volume/Cap: 0.43 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.43 0.35 0.40 0.56 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 Delay/Veh: 36.2 16.6 16.6 58.5 23.7 22.9 35.6 38.4 38.3 43.9 43.9 43.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 36.2 16.6 16.6 58.5 23.7 22.9 35.6 38.4 38.3 43.9 43.9 43.9 LOS by Move: D B B E C C D D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 12 12 2 7 5 4 6 5 5 5 5
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 344 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

APPENDIX C

SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 345 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 346 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 347 5/5/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 348 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

APPENDIX D

CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRIP GENERATION
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 349 5/5/2026
AECOM, 2012
Unit A DT 2In Out Total In Out Total
Cumulative Project Trip Rates1 (Land Use Code)
C hurch (560) TSF 9.11 0.35 0.21 0.56 0.26 0.29 0.55
A partment (220) DU 6.65 0.26 0.25 0.51 0.40 0.22 0.62
Specialty Retail C enter (814) TSF 44.32 1.19 1.52 2.71 3.28 3.56 6.84 Residential C ondominium/Townhouse (230) DU 5.81 0.07 0.37 0.44 0.35 0.17 0.52 Mov ie Theater without Matinee (443) Seats 1.76 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.16 0.32 Recreational C ommunity C enter (495) TSF 22.88 0.99 0.63 1.62 0.54 0.91 1.45 Fast-Food Restaurant with Driv e-Through (934) TSF 495.12 25.17 24.18 49.35 17.60 16.24 33.84 Single-Family Detached Housing (210) DU 9.57 0.19 0.56 0.75 0.64 0.37 1.01 Cumulative Project Trip Generation Size
A lliance C hurch of O range 21.000 191 7 4 12 6 6 12
C & C A ffordable Housing Project 36 239 9 9 18 15 8 22 C atalina Retail Building 5.580 247 7 8 15 18 20 38
C ity V enture C ondo 8 46 1 3 4 3 1 4
Discov ery Science C enter Ph. II 275 484 1 1 3 44 44 88 Dow ntow n A rtist Lofts III 16 106 4 4 8 6 3 10
First and C abrillo Towers* 374 1,691 29 101 129 83 54 137 Francis Xav ier 12 80 3 3 6 5 3 7
Latino Health A ccess C omm. C tr. 3.074 70 3 2 5 2 3 4 McDonalds 3.838 1,900 97 93 189 68 62 130
O ne Broadway Plaza* 518.000 6,884 661 132 793 234 616 850 Related C o. A partments Phase I 74 492 19 18 38 30 16 46 Related C o. A partments Phase I 1.500 66 2 2 4 5 5 10
Related C o. A partments Phase II 13 86 3 3 7 5 3 8
Related C o. A partments Phase II 12 80 3 3 6 5 3 7
TA V A Homes 24 230 5 14 18 15 9 24
Xerox Tower II* 210.000 2,312 185 25 210 36 174 210
Total Cumulative Trip Generation 15,207 1,039 426 1,465 579 1,030 1,609 Notes: TSF - thousand square feet; DU - dwelling unit
* Trip generation referenced from Santa Ana Renaissance Specific Plan Traffic Impact Study (Appendix D, KOA Corporation).

A .M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
1 Trip rates referenced from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 8th Edition (2008).

Cumulative Project Trip Generation Summary
M:\Planning\Projects\Santa Ana Blvd Grade Sep\Background Data\Trip gen_cumulativeTrip Generation3/12/2012 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 350 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

APPENDIX E
OPENING YEAR (2016)

LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 351 5/5/2026
2016 AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:51:17 Page 2-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Santiago St/Civic Center Dr
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.495
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.3
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: B
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Civic Center Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 153 123 14 2 216 47 100 43 148 47 45 7
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 157 126 14 2 221 48 102 44 152 48 46 7
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CumProjects: 29 0 2 0 10 2 1 3 7 1 13 0
Initial Fut: 186 126 16 2 231 50 103 47 159 49 59 7
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 186 126 16 2 231 50 103 47 159 49 59 7
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 186 126 16 2 231 50 103 47 159 49 59 7
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 186 126 16 2 231 50 104 47 159 49 59 7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.89 0.11 1.00 0.82 0.18 0.69 0.31 1.00 0.43 0.51 0.06 Final Sat.: 522 503 65 514 467 101 349 159 595 209 252 31 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.36 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.27 0.23 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 12.8 10.7 10.7 9.4 14.2 14.2 12.1 12.1 10.3 11.7 11.7 11.7 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 12.8 10.7 10.7 9.4 14.2 14.2 12.1 12.1 10.3 11.7 11.7 11.7 LOS by Move: B B B A B B B B B B B B
ApproachDel: 11.9 14.2 11.2 11.7
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: 11.9 14.2 11.2 11.7
LOS by Appr: B B B B
AllWayAvgQ: 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 352 5/5/2026
2016 AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:51:28 Page 3-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.521
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: A
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 21 43 62 220 122 83 29 326 19 114 836 241
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 22 44 64 225 125 85 30 334 19 117 857 247
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CumProjects: 0 0 0 13 0 9 11 39 0 0 60 22
Initial Fut: 22 44 64 238 125 94 41 373 19 117 917 269
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 22 44 64 238 125 94 41 373 19 117 917 269
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 22 44 64 238 125 94 41 373 19 117 917 269
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 22 44 64 239 125 94 41 373 19 117 917 269
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 3231 169 1700 3400 1700 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.14 0.07 0.06 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.27 0.16 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 353 5/5/2026
2016 AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:51:32 Page 4-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.6] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Logan St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 616 0 0 1197 8
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 631 0 0 1227 8
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CumProjects: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 82 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 683 0 0 1309 8
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 683 0 0 1309 8
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 683 0 0 1309 8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 440 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 570 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 570 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 11.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * B * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 11.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * B * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 354 5/5/2026
2016 AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:51:36 Page 5-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SARTC Drwy/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.9] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SARTC Drwy Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 581 39 0 1201 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 596 40 0 1231 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CumProjects: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 82 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 648 40 0 1313 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 648 40 0 1313 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 648 40 0 1313 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 236 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 772 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 772 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 9.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * A * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 9.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: A * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 355 5/5/2026
2016 AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:51:46 Page 6-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[ 82.6] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Fuller St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 22 0 23 1 0 1 4 583 25 32 1148 6
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 23 0 24 1 0 1 4 598 26 33 1177 6
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CumProjects: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 82 0
Initial Fut: 23 0 24 1 0 1 4 650 26 33 1259 6
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 23 0 24 1 0 1 4 650 26 33 1259 6
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 23 0 24 1 0 1 4 650 26 33 1259 6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 1998 2001 662 2010 2011 1262 1265 xxxx xxxxx 675 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 45 61 465 44 60 210 556 xxxx xxxxx 926 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 44 58 465 41 57 210 556 xxxx xxxxx 926 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.52 0.00 0.05 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxx 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 13.2 xxxxx xxxx 22.3 11.5 xxxx xxxxx 9.0 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * C B * * A * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 44 xxxx xxxxx 41 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 1.9 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:155.1 xxxx xxxxx 95.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: F * * F * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 82.6 58.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 356 5/5/2026
2016 AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:51:50 Page 7-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.555
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.0
Optimal Cycle: 45 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: I-5 SB Ramps Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 378 0 84 230 393 0 0 1114 264
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 387 0 86 236 403 0 0 1142 271
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CumProjects: 0 0 0 0 0 17 15 37 0 0 65 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 387 0 103 251 440 0 0 1207 271
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 387 0 103 251 440 0 0 1207 271
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 387 0 103 251 440 0 0 1207 271
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 387 0 103 251 440 0 0 1207 271
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.89 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.45 0.55 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 3502 0 1615 3502 5187 0 0 4123 924
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.53 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.32 0.47 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.55 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.0 0.0 34.8 39.3 40.1 0.0 0.0 16.0 16.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.0 0.0 34.8 39.3 40.1 0.0 0.0 16.0 16.0 LOS by Move: A A A D A C D D A A B B
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 6 0 3 4 5 0 0 11 11
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 357 5/5/2026
MITIG8 - 2016 AM Thu May 3, 2012 10:34:54 Page 1-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.776
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.8
Optimal Cycle: 72 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Grand Ave Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 99 844 18 106 1026 972 161 120 451 14 275 16
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 101 865 18 109 1052 996 165 123 462 14 282 16 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CumProjects: 2 0 0 0 0 63 30 0 7 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 103 865 18 109 1052 1059 195 123 469 14 282 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 103 865 18 109 1052 1059 195 123 469 14 282 16 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 103 865 18 109 1052 1059 195 123 469 14 282 16 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 103 865 18 109 1052 1059 195 123 469 14 282 16 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.75 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 2.94 0.06 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.09 1.81 0.10 Final Sat.: 1805 5063 108 1805 3610 2842 3502 1900 2842 164 3222 187 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.06 0.29 0.37 0.06 0.06 0.17 0.09 0.09 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.07 0.41 0.41 0.14 0.48 0.48 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.11 0.11 0.11 Volume/Cap: 0.78 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.61 0.78 0.26 0.30 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Delay/Veh: 69.8 21.1 21.1 40.0 19.7 24.4 33.0 33.6 43.4 52.3 52.3 52.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 69.8 21.1 21.1 40.0 19.7 24.4 33.0 33.6 43.4 52.3 52.3 52.3 LOS by Move: E C C D B C C C D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 7 7 3 13 17 2 3 8 7 7 7
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 358 5/5/2026
2016 PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:55:21 Page 2-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Santiago St/Civic Center Dr
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.558
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.3
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: B
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Civic Center Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 57 169 15 4 158 38 234 52 257 11 11 10
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 58 173 15 4 162 39 240 53 263 11 11 10
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CumProjects: 22 0 1 0 13 1 2 12 31 1 5 0
Initial Fut: 80 173 16 4 175 40 242 65 294 12 16 10
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 80 173 16 4 175 40 242 65 294 12 16 10
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 80 173 16 4 175 40 242 65 294 12 16 10
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 80 173 16 4 175 40 242 65 294 12 16 10
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.91 0.09 1.00 0.81 0.19 0.79 0.21 1.00 0.32 0.42 0.26 Final Sat.: 495 491 46 487 438 100 434 117 661 157 209 131 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.35 0.35 0.01 0.40 0.40 0.56 0.56 0.45 0.08 0.08 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 11.0 12.4 12.4 9.8 13.1 13.1 16.5 16.5 12.0 10.2 10.2 10.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 11.0 12.4 12.4 9.8 13.1 13.1 16.5 16.5 12.0 10.2 10.2 10.2 LOS by Move: B B B A B B C C B B B B
ApproachDel: 11.9 13.0 14.3 10.2
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: 11.9 13.0 14.3 10.2
LOS by Appr: B B B B
AllWayAvgQ: 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.6 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 359 5/5/2026
2016 PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:55:28 Page 3-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.598
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 29 Level Of Service: A
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 42 77 104 240 128 61 43 750 16 103 439 142
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 43 79 107 246 131 63 44 769 16 106 450 146 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CumProjects: 0 0 0 35 0 12 17 92 0 0 45 11
Initial Fut: 43 79 107 281 131 75 61 861 16 106 495 157 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 43 79 107 281 131 75 61 861 16 106 495 157
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 43 79 107 281 131 75 61 861 16 106 495 157 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 43 79 107 281 131 75 61 861 16 106 495 157 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 3336 64 1700 3400 1700 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.17 0.08 0.04 0.04 0.26 0.26 0.06 0.15 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 360 5/5/2026
2016 PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:55:32 Page 4-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.8] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Logan St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1166 0 0 660 8
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1195 0 0 676 8
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CumProjects: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 127 0 0 55 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1322 0 0 731 8
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1322 0 0 731 8
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1322 0 0 731 8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 248 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 758 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 758 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.8 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * A * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 9.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * A * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 361 5/5/2026
2016 PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:55:35 Page 5-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SARTC Drwy/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.5] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SARTC Drwy Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 1076 33 0 680 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 0 0 99 0 0 0 0 1103 34 0 697 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CumProjects: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 127 0 0 55 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 99 0 0 0 0 1230 34 0 752 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 99 0 0 0 0 1230 34 0 752 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 99 0 0 0 0 1230 34 0 752 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 427 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 582 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 582 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.17 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.6 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 12.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 12.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: B * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 362 5/5/2026
2016 PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:55:38 Page 6-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[286.2] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Fuller St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 24 0 82 16 1 6 7 1149 15 14 648 3
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 25 0 84 16 1 6 7 1178 15 14 664 3
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CumProjects: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 127 0 0 55 0
Initial Fut: 25 0 84 16 1 6 7 1305 15 14 719 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 25 0 84 16 1 6 7 1305 15 14 719 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 25 0 84 16 1 6 7 1305 15 14 719 3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 2080 2078 1312 2118 2084 721 722 xxxx xxxxx 1320 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 40 54 196 37 54 431 889 xxxx xxxxx 530 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 37 52 196 21 52 431 889 xxxx xxxxx 530 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.66 0.00 0.43 0.79 0.02 0.01 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 2.0 xxxx xxxx 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 36.6 xxxxx xxxx 13.5 9.1 xxxx xxxxx 12.0 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * E * * B A * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 37 xxxx xxxxx 21 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 2.3 xxxx xxxxx 2.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:209.2 xxxx xxxxx 382.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: F * * F * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 75.7 286.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 363 5/5/2026
2016 PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:55:41 Page 7-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.520
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.6
Optimal Cycle: 42 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: I-5 SB Ramps Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 296 0 83 663 608 0 0 571 193
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 303 0 85 680 623 0 0 585 198
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CumProjects: 0 0 0 1 0 10 39 88 0 0 45 1
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 304 0 95 719 711 0 0 630 199
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 304 0 95 719 711 0 0 630 199
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 304 0 95 719 711 0 0 630 199
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 304 0 95 719 711 0 0 630 199
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.28 0.72 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 3502 0 1615 3502 5187 0 0 3801 1199
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.06 0.21 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.35 0.52 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.8 0.0 37.7 23.4 21.4 0.0 0.0 28.1 28.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.8 0.0 37.7 23.4 21.4 0.0 0.0 28.1 28.1 LOS by Move: A A A D A D C C A A C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 5 0 3 8 5 0 0 7 7
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 364 5/5/2026
MITIG8 - 2016 PM Thu May 3, 2012 10:36:16 Page 1-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.603
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.4
Optimal Cycle: 49 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Grand Ave Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 150 1573 19 44 573 372 269 207 323 31 145 65
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 154 1612 19 45 587 381 276 212 331 32 149 67 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CumProjects: 4 0 0 0 0 42 81 0 7 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 158 1612 19 45 587 423 357 212 338 32 149 67 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 158 1612 19 45 587 423 357 212 338 32 149 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 158 1612 19 45 587 423 357 212 338 32 149 67 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 158 1612 19 45 587 423 357 212 338 32 149 67 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.75 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.91 0.91 0.91 Lanes: 1.00 2.96 0.04 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.26 1.20 0.54 Final Sat.: 1805 5115 62 1805 3610 2842 3502 1900 2842 443 2073 929 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.32 0.32 0.02 0.16 0.15 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.07 0.07 0.07 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.20 0.52 0.52 0.04 0.37 0.37 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.12 0.12 Volume/Cap: 0.44 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.44 0.41 0.52 0.57 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Delay/Veh: 36.2 17.0 17.0 60.3 24.2 23.8 36.6 38.3 38.4 44.4 44.4 44.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 36.2 17.0 17.0 60.3 24.2 23.8 36.6 38.3 38.4 44.4 44.4 44.4 LOS by Move: D B B E C C D D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 13 13 2 7 6 5 6 5 5 5 5
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 365 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

APPENDIX F
FUTURE YEAR (2035)

LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 366 5/5/2026
2035 AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:59:48 Page 2-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Santiago St/Civic Center Dr
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.559
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Civic Center Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Permitted Protected Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 235 441 36 5 700 117 150 56 199 66 58 15
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 235 441 36 5 700 117 150 56 199 66 58 15
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 235 441 36 5 700 117 150 56 199 66 58 15
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 235 441 36 5 700 117 150 56 199 66 58 15
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 235 441 36 5 700 117 150 56 199 66 58 15
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 235 441 36 5 700 117 150 56 199 66 58 15
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.92 0.08 0.01 1.71 0.28 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.83 0.22 Final Sat.: 1700 1572 128 21 2895 484 1700 1700 1700 1614 1419 367 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.09 0.03 0.12 0.04 0.04 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 367 5/5/2026
2035 AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 12:59:57 Page 3-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.771
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 61 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 60 223 111 406 252 328 171 584 30 144 1087 458 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 60 223 111 406 252 328 171 584 30 144 1087 458 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 60 223 111 406 252 328 171 584 30 144 1087 458 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 60 223 111 406 252 328 171 584 30 144 1087 458 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 60 223 111 406 252 328 171 584 30 144 1087 458 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 60 223 111 406 252 328 171 584 30 144 1087 458 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1700 1700 1700 3400 1700 1700 1700 3234 166 1700 3400 1700 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.13 0.07 0.12 0.15 0.19 0.10 0.18 0.18 0.08 0.32 0.27 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 368 5/5/2026
2035 AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:00:05 Page 4-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.9] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Logan St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 1102 0 0 1656 9
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 1102 0 0 1656 9
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 1102 0 0 1656 9
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 1102 0 0 1656 9
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 1102 0 0 1656 9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 557 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 479 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 479 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 12.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * B * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 12.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * B * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 369 5/5/2026
2035 AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:00:13 Page 5-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SARTC Drwy/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SARTC Drwy Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 581 39 0 1201 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 581 39 0 1201 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 581 39 0 1201 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 581 39 0 1201 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 581 39 0 1201 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 213 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 798 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 798 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 9.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * A * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 9.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: A * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 370 5/5/2026
2035 AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:00:19 Page 6-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 10.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[584.2] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Fuller St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 25 0 26 1 0 1 4 1070 28 36 1611 7
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 25 0 26 1 0 1 4 1070 28 36 1611 7
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 25 0 26 1 0 1 4 1070 28 36 1611 7
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 25 0 26 1 0 1 4 1070 28 36 1611 7
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 25 0 26 1 0 1 4 1070 28 36 1611 7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 2779 2782 1084 2792 2793 1615 1618 xxxx xxxxx 1098 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 12 19 266 12 19 130 408 xxxx xxxxx 643 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 12 18 266 10 18 130 408 xxxx xxxxx 643 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 2.14 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.01 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.06 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.3 xxxx xxxx 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 20.0 xxxxx xxxx 33.0 13.9 xxxx xxxxx 10.9 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * C * * D B * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 12 xxxx xxxxx 10 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 4.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 1171 xxxx xxxxx 384.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: F * * F * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 584.2 208.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 371 5/5/2026
2035 AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:00:31 Page 7-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.777
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 31.7
Optimal Cycle: 72 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: I-5 SB Ramps Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 489 0 133 412 861 0 0 1521 383
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 489 0 133 412 861 0 0 1521 383
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 489 0 133 412 861 0 0 1521 383
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 489 0 133 412 861 0 0 1521 383
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 489 0 133 412 861 0 0 1521 383
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 489 0 133 412 861 0 0 1521 383
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.40 0.60 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 3502 0 1615 3502 5187 0 0 4019 1012
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.08 0.12 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.38 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.18 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.49 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.46 0.55 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.78 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.2 0.0 37.8 35.9 40.6 0.0 0.0 22.8 22.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.2 0.0 37.8 35.9 40.6 0.0 0.0 22.8 22.8 LOS by Move: A A A D A D D D A A C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 9 0 4 6 9 0 0 17 17
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 372 5/5/2026
MITIG8 - 2035 AM Thu May 3, 2012 10:37:11 Page 1-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.861
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 32.1
Optimal Cycle: 94 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Grand Ave Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Ovl Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 3 1 0 1 0 3 0 2 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 106 1091 40 236 1782 1218 431 201 608 18 353 39 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 106 1091 40 236 1782 1218 431 201 608 18 353 39 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 106 1091 40 236 1782 1218 431 201 608 18 353 39 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 106 1091 40 236 1782 1218 431 201 608 18 353 39 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 106 1091 40 236 1782 1218 431 201 608 18 353 39 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 106 1091 40 236 1782 1218 431 201 608 18 353 39 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.91 0.75 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lanes: 1.00 3.86 0.14 1.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.09 1.72 0.19 Final Sat.: 1805 6638 243 1805 5187 2842 3502 1900 2842 156 3058 338 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.34 0.43 0.12 0.11 0.21 0.12 0.12 0.12 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.07 0.32 0.32 0.25 0.50 0.50 0.18 0.18 0.25 0.13 0.13 0.13 Volume/Cap: 0.86 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.69 0.86 0.68 0.59 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Delay/Veh: 88.3 28.3 28.3 33.4 20.0 27.7 41.4 40.2 46.5 57.1 57.1 57.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 88.3 28.3 28.3 33.4 20.0 27.7 41.4 40.2 46.5 57.1 57.1 57.1 LOS by Move: F C C C C C D D D E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 8 8 7 16 22 6 5 10 9 9 9
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 373 5/5/2026
2035 PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:07:02 Page 2-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Santiago St/Civic Center Dr
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.610
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service: B
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Civic Center Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Permitted Protected Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 89 557 30 7 492 71 338 68 404 22 15 18
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 89 557 30 7 492 71 338 68 404 22 15 18
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 89 557 30 7 492 71 338 68 404 22 15 18
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 89 557 30 7 492 71 338 68 404 22 15 18
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 89 557 30 7 492 71 338 68 404 22 15 18
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 89 557 30 7 492 71 338 68 404 22 15 18
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.95 0.05 0.02 1.73 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.55 0.65 Final Sat.: 1700 1613 87 42 2935 424 1700 1700 1700 1360 927 1113 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.35 0.35 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.20 0.04 0.24 0.01 0.02 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 374 5/5/2026
2035 PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:07:02 Page 3-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.774
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 61 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 72 249 171 362 264 190 215 1111 42 140 663 258 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 72 249 171 362 264 190 215 1111 42 140 663 258 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 72 249 171 362 264 190 215 1111 42 140 663 258 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 72 249 171 362 264 190 215 1111 42 140 663 258 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 72 249 171 362 264 190 215 1111 42 140 663 258 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 72 249 171 362 264 190 215 1111 42 140 663 258 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.93 0.07 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1700 1700 1700 3400 1700 1700 1700 3276 124 1700 3400 1700 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.15 0.10 0.11 0.16 0.11 0.13 0.34 0.34 0.08 0.20 0.15 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 375 5/5/2026
2035 PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:07:02 Page 4-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Logan St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 1644 0 0 1036 9
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 1644 0 0 1036 9
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 1644 0 0 1036 9
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 1644 0 0 1036 9
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 1644 0 0 1036 9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 350 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 652 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 652 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 10.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * B * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 10.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * B * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 376 5/5/2026
2035 PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:07:02 Page 5-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SARTC Drwy/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 14.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SARTC Drwy Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 1607 37 0 1061 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 1607 37 0 1061 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 1607 37 0 1061 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 1607 37 0 1061 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 1607 37 0 1061 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 554 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 481 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 481 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.23 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.9 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 14.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 14.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: B * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 377 5/5/2026
2035 PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:07:03 Page 6-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 48.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[3602.6] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Fuller St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 27 0 92 18 1 7 8 1619 17 16 1176 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 27 0 92 18 1 7 8 1619 17 16 1176 3
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 27 0 92 18 1 7 8 1619 17 16 1176 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 27 0 92 18 1 7 8 1619 17 16 1176 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 27 0 92 18 1 7 8 1619 17 16 1176 3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 2857 2855 1628 2899 2862 1178 1179 xxxx xxxxx 1636 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 11 17 127 10 17 235 600 xxxx xxxxx 402 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 10 16 127 3 16 235 600 xxxx xxxxx 402 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 2.80 0.00 0.72 6.67 0.06 0.03 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxx 0.1 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 85.3 xxxxx xxxx 20.8 11.1 xxxx xxxxx 14.3 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * F * * C B * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 10 xxxx xxxxx 3 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 4.4 xxxx xxxxx 3.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 1578 xxxx xxxxx 4922 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: F * * F * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 423.9 3602.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 378 5/5/2026
2035 PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:07:03 Page 7-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.731
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 30.7
Optimal Cycle: 64 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: I-5 SB Ramps Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 388 0 193 968 909 0 0 1001 245
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 388 0 193 968 909 0 0 1001 245
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 388 0 193 968 909 0 0 1001 245
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 388 0 193 968 909 0 0 1001 245
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 388 0 193 968 909 0 0 1001 245
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 388 0 193 968 909 0 0 1001 245
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.41 0.59 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 3502 0 1615 3502 5187 0 0 4042 989
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.12 0.28 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.34 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.73 0.73 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.73 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.6 0.0 49.8 28.9 23.6 0.0 0.0 30.7 30.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.6 0.0 49.8 28.9 23.6 0.0 0.0 30.7 30.7 LOS by Move: A A A D A D C C A A C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 7 0 7 13 7 0 0 12 12
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 379 5/5/2026
MITIG8 - 2035 PM Thu May 3, 2012 10:37:59 Page 1-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.910
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 37.8
Optimal Cycle: 115 Level Of Service: D
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Grand Ave Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Ovl Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 3 1 0 1 0 3 0 2 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 225 2298 93 171 917 670 486 468 418 87 187 109 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 225 2298 93 171 917 670 486 468 418 87 187 109 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 225 2298 93 171 917 670 486 468 418 87 187 109 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 225 2298 93 171 917 670 486 468 418 87 187 109 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 225 2298 93 171 917 670 486 468 418 87 187 109 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 225 2298 93 171 917 670 486 468 418 87 187 109 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.91 0.75 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.90 0.90 0.90 Lanes: 1.00 3.84 0.16 1.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.45 0.98 0.57 Final Sat.: 1805 6607 267 1805 5187 2842 3502 1900 2842 776 1668 972 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.35 0.35 0.09 0.18 0.24 0.14 0.25 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.11 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.38 0.38 0.10 0.32 0.32 0.27 0.27 0.44 0.12 0.12 0.12 Volume/Cap: 0.74 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.56 0.74 0.51 0.91 0.34 0.91 0.91 0.91 Delay/Veh: 48.9 34.5 34.5 85.5 28.7 33.7 31.4 55.5 18.6 66.8 66.8 66.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 48.9 34.5 34.5 85.5 28.7 33.7 31.4 55.5 18.6 66.8 66.8 66.8 LOS by Move: D C C F C C C E B E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 23 23 8 9 12 6 16 5 9 9 9
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 380 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

APPENDIX G
EXISTING + PROJECT

LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 381 5/5/2026
Ex+Proj AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:20:27 Page 2-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Santiago St/Civic Center Dr
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.455
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 11.6
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: B
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Civic Center Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 153 123 14 2 216 47 100 43 148 47 45 7
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 153 123 14 2 216 47 100 43 148 47 45 7
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 4 4
Initial Fut: 153 123 22 2 216 47 100 43 148 60 49 11
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 153 123 22 2 216 47 100 43 148 60 49 11
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 153 123 22 2 216 47 100 43 148 60 49 11
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 153 123 22 2 216 47 100 43 148 60 49 11
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.85 0.15 1.00 0.82 0.18 0.70 0.30 1.00 0.50 0.41 0.09 Final Sat.: 528 492 88 522 475 103 363 156 611 255 208 47 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.29 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.28 0.28 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 11.8 10.5 10.5 9.3 13.2 13.2 11.6 11.6 9.9 11.4 11.4 11.4 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 11.8 10.5 10.5 9.3 13.2 13.2 11.6 11.6 9.9 11.4 11.4 11.4 LOS by Move: B B B A B B B B A B B B
ApproachDel: 11.1 13.2 10.7 11.4
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: 11.1 13.2 10.7 11.4
LOS by Appr: B B B B
AllWayAvgQ: 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 382 5/5/2026
Ex+Proj AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:20:28 Page 3-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.532
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: A
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 21 43 62 220 122 83 29 326 19 114 836 241
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 21 43 62 220 122 83 29 326 19 114 836 241
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 9 0 4 0 0 0 -9 -8 4
Initial Fut: 21 43 62 229 122 87 29 326 19 105 828 245
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 21 43 62 229 122 87 29 326 19 105 828 245
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 21 43 62 229 122 87 29 326 19 105 828 245
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 21 43 62 229 122 87 29 326 19 105 828 245
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 3213 187 1700 3400 1700 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.13 0.07 0.05 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.06 0.24 0.14 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 383 5/5/2026
Ex+Proj AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:20:28 Page 4-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 0.0] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Logan St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 616 0 0 1197 8
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 616 0 0 1197 8
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 -21 0 9 0 0 8 -8
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 625 0 0 1205 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 625 0 0 1205 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 625 0 0 1205 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 402 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 604 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 604 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 384 5/5/2026
Ex+Proj AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:20:28 Page 5-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SARTC Drwy/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SARTC Drwy Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 581 39 0 1201 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 581 39 0 1201 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 8 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 590 39 0 1209 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 590 39 0 1209 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 590 39 0 1209 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 216 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 795 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 795 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 9.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * A * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 9.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: A * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 385 5/5/2026
Ex+Proj AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:20:28 Page 6-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[ 56.0] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Fuller St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 22 0 23 1 0 1 4 583 25 32 1148 6
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 22 0 23 1 0 1 4 583 25 32 1148 6
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 22 0 23 1 0 1 4 592 25 32 1148 6
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 22 0 23 1 0 1 4 592 25 32 1148 6
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 22 0 23 1 0 1 4 592 25 32 1148 6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 1828 1831 605 1839 1840 1151 1154 xxxx xxxxx 617 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 60 77 502 59 76 243 613 xxxx xxxxx 973 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 58 74 502 54 73 243 613 xxxx xxxxx 973 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.38 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 12.5 xxxxx xxxx 19.9 10.9 xxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * C B * * A * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 58 xxxx xxxxx 54 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 1.4 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:101.5 xxxx xxxxx 72.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: F * * F * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 56.0 46.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F E * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 386 5/5/2026
Ex+Proj AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:20:29 Page 7-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.522
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 25.6
Optimal Cycle: 42 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: I-5 SB Ramps Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 378 0 84 230 393 0 0 1114 264
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 378 0 84 230 393 0 0 1114 264
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 378 0 84 230 402 0 0 1114 264
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 378 0 84 230 402 0 0 1114 264
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 378 0 84 230 402 0 0 1114 264
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 378 0 84 230 402 0 0 1114 264
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.43 0.57 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 3502 0 1615 3502 5187 0 0 4072 965
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.27 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.25 0.44 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.9 0.0 33.6 39.4 39.9 0.0 0.0 15.8 15.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.9 0.0 33.6 39.4 39.9 0.0 0.0 15.8 15.8 LOS by Move: A A A D A C D D A A B B
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 6 0 2 3 4 0 0 10 10
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 387 5/5/2026
MITIG8 - Ex+Proj AM Thu May 3, 2012 10:38:57 Page 1-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.728
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.1
Optimal Cycle: 63 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Grand Ave Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 99 844 18 106 1026 972 161 120 451 14 275 16
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 99 844 18 106 1026 972 161 120 451 14 275 16 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 99 844 18 106 1026 972 170 120 451 14 275 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 99 844 18 106 1026 972 170 120 451 14 275 16 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 99 844 18 106 1026 972 170 120 451 14 275 16 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 99 844 18 106 1026 972 170 120 451 14 275 16 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.75 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 2.94 0.06 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.09 1.81 0.10 Final Sat.: 1805 5063 108 1805 3610 2842 3502 1900 2842 164 3222 187 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.17 0.17 0.06 0.28 0.34 0.05 0.06 0.16 0.09 0.09 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.08 0.40 0.40 0.14 0.47 0.47 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.12 0.12 0.12 Volume/Cap: 0.73 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.61 0.73 0.22 0.29 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 Delay/Veh: 63.2 21.5 21.5 40.2 20.3 23.4 32.3 33.0 40.7 48.9 48.9 48.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 63.2 21.5 21.5 40.2 20.3 23.4 32.3 33.0 40.7 48.9 48.9 48.9 LOS by Move: E C C D C C C C D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 7 7 3 13 15 2 3 7 6 6 6
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 388 5/5/2026
Ex+Proj PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:20:51 Page 2-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Santiago St/Civic Center Dr
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.511
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.4
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: B
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Civic Center Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 57 169 15 4 158 38 234 52 257 11 11 10
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 169 15 4 158 38 234 52 257 11 11 10
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 3
Initial Fut: 57 169 23 4 158 38 234 52 257 19 14 13
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 57 169 23 4 158 38 234 52 257 19 14 13
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 57 169 23 4 158 38 234 52 257 19 14 13
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 57 169 23 4 158 38 234 52 257 19 14 13
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.88 0.12 1.00 0.81 0.19 0.82 0.18 1.00 0.42 0.30 0.28 Final Sat.: 506 487 66 498 443 107 458 102 673 213 157 146 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.35 0.35 0.01 0.36 0.36 0.51 0.51 0.38 0.09 0.09 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 10.3 12.0 12.0 9.6 12.1 12.1 15.1 15.1 10.9 10.1 10.1 10.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 10.3 12.0 12.0 9.6 12.1 12.1 15.1 15.1 10.9 10.1 10.1 10.1 LOS by Move: B B B A B B C C B B B B
ApproachDel: 11.6 12.1 13.1 10.1
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: 11.6 12.1 13.1 10.1
LOS by Appr: B B B B
AllWayAvgQ: 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 389 5/5/2026
Ex+Proj PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:20:52 Page 3-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.588
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: A
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 42 77 104 240 128 61 43 750 16 103 439 142
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 42 77 104 240 128 61 43 750 16 103 439 142 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 0 -5 -6 5
Initial Fut: 42 77 104 245 128 64 43 750 16 98 433 147
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 42 77 104 245 128 64 43 750 16 98 433 147
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 42 77 104 245 128 64 43 750 16 98 433 147
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 42 77 104 245 128 64 43 750 16 98 433 147
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 3329 71 1700 3400 1700 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.14 0.08 0.04 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.13 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 390 5/5/2026
Ex+Proj PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:20:52 Page 4-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 0.0] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Logan St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1166 0 0 660 8
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1166 0 0 660 8
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 -14 0 5 0 0 8 -8
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1171 0 0 668 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1171 0 0 668 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1171 0 0 668 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 223 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 787 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 787 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 391 5/5/2026
Ex+Proj PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:20:52 Page 5-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SARTC Drwy/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.8] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SARTC Drwy Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 1076 33 0 680 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 1076 33 0 680 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 8 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 1081 33 0 688 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 1081 33 0 688 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 1081 33 0 688 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 377 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 627 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 627 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.15 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.5 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 11.8 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 11.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: B * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 392 5/5/2026
Ex+Proj PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:20:53 Page 6-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 4.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[136.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Fuller St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 24 0 82 16 1 6 7 1149 15 14 648 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 24 0 82 16 1 6 7 1149 15 14 648 3
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 8 0
Initial Fut: 24 0 82 16 1 6 7 1154 15 14 656 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 24 0 82 16 1 6 7 1154 15 14 656 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 24 0 82 16 1 6 7 1154 15 14 656 3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 1865 1863 1162 1902 1869 658 659 xxxx xxxxx 1169 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 56 74 240 53 73 468 939 xxxx xxxxx 605 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 54 72 240 34 71 468 939 xxxx xxxxx 605 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.45 0.00 0.34 0.47 0.01 0.01 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 1.5 xxxx xxxx 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 27.6 xxxxx xxxx 12.8 8.9 xxxx xxxxx 11.1 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * D * * B A * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 54 xxxx xxxxx 35 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 1.7 xxxx xxxxx 1.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:117.6 xxxx xxxxx 180.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: F * * F * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 48.0 136.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: E F * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 393 5/5/2026
Ex+Proj PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:20:53 Page 7-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.485
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.4
Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: I-5 SB Ramps Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 296 0 83 663 608 0 0 571 193
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 296 0 83 663 608 0 0 571 193
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 296 0 83 663 613 0 0 571 193
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 296 0 83 663 613 0 0 571 193
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 296 0 83 663 613 0 0 571 193
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 296 0 83 663 613 0 0 571 193
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.24 0.76 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 3502 0 1615 3502 5187 0 0 3729 1261
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.05 0.19 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.29 0.49 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.49 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.9 0.0 36.5 23.2 21.2 0.0 0.0 27.9 27.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.9 0.0 36.5 23.2 21.2 0.0 0.0 27.9 27.9 LOS by Move: A A A D A D C C A A C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 5 0 2 8 5 0 0 7 7
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 394 5/5/2026
MITIG8 - Ex+Proj PM Thu May 3, 2012 10:39:52 Page 1-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Existing plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.586
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 25.7
Optimal Cycle: 47 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Grand Ave Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 150 1573 19 44 573 372 269 207 323 31 145 65
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 150 1573 19 44 573 372 269 207 323 31 145 65 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 150 1573 19 44 573 372 274 207 323 31 145 65 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 150 1573 19 44 573 372 274 207 323 31 145 65 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 150 1573 19 44 573 372 274 207 323 31 145 65 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 150 1573 19 44 573 372 274 207 323 31 145 65 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.75 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.91 0.91 0.91 Lanes: 1.00 2.96 0.04 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.26 1.20 0.54 Final Sat.: 1805 5115 62 1805 3610 2842 3502 1900 2842 443 2073 929 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.02 0.16 0.13 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.07 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.52 0.52 0.04 0.37 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.12 0.12 Volume/Cap: 0.43 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.43 0.35 0.40 0.56 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 Delay/Veh: 36.2 16.6 16.6 58.5 23.7 22.9 35.6 38.4 38.3 43.9 43.9 43.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 36.2 16.6 16.6 58.5 23.7 22.9 35.6 38.4 38.3 43.9 43.9 43.9 LOS by Move: D B B E C C D D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 12 12 2 7 5 4 6 5 5 5 5
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 395 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

APPENDIX H
OPENING YEAR (2016) + PROJECT

LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 396 5/5/2026
2016 + Project AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:22:02 Page 2-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Santiago St/Civic Center Dr
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.520
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.8
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: B
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Civic Center Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 186 126 16 2 231 50 104 47 159 49 59 7
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 191 129 16 2 237 51 107 48 163 50 60 7
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 4 4
Initial Fut: 191 129 24 2 237 51 107 48 163 63 64 11
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 191 129 24 2 237 51 107 48 163 63 64 11
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 191 129 24 2 237 51 107 48 163 63 64 11
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 191 129 24 2 237 51 107 48 163 63 64 11
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.84 0.16 1.00 0.82 0.18 0.69 0.31 1.00 0.46 0.46 0.08 Final Sat.: 510 469 89 501 456 99 343 155 581 221 225 39 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.37 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.29 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 13.3 11.1 11.1 9.6 15.1 15.1 12.5 12.5 10.6 12.4 12.4 12.4 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 13.3 11.1 11.1 9.6 15.1 15.1 12.5 12.5 10.6 12.4 12.4 12.4 LOS by Move: B B B A C C B B B B B B
ApproachDel: 12.3 15.0 11.5 12.4
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: 12.3 15.0 11.5 12.4
LOS by Appr: B C B B
AllWayAvgQ: 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 397 5/5/2026
2016 + Project AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:22:02 Page 3-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.587
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: A
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 22 44 64 239 125 94 41 373 19 117 917 269
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 23 45 66 245 128 96 42 382 19 120 940 276
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 9 0 4 0 0 0 -9 -8 4
Initial Fut: 23 45 66 254 128 100 42 382 19 111 932 280 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 23 45 66 254 128 100 42 382 19 111 932 280
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 23 45 66 254 128 100 42 382 19 111 932 280 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 23 45 66 254 128 100 42 382 19 111 932 280 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 3235 165 1700 3400 1700 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.15 0.08 0.06 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.27 0.16 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 398 5/5/2026
2016 + Project AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:22:02 Page 4-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 0.0] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Logan St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 683 0 0 1309 8
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 700 0 0 1342 8
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 -24 0 0 0 0 9 -9
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0 700 0 0 1351 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 700 0 0 1351 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 700 0 0 1351 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 450 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 562 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 562 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 399 5/5/2026
2016 + Project AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:22:03 Page 5-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SARTC Drwy/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 10.0] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SARTC Drwy Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 648 39 0 1313 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 664 40 0 1346 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 673 40 0 1346 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 673 40 0 1346 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 673 40 0 1346 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 244 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 762 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 762 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 10.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * A * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 10.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: A * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 400 5/5/2026
2016 + Project AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:22:03 Page 6-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[ 98.3] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Fuller St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 23 0 24 1 0 1 4 650 26 33 1259 6
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 24 0 25 1 0 1 4 666 27 34 1290 6
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 24 0 25 1 0 1 4 675 27 34 1290 6
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 24 0 25 1 0 1 4 675 27 34 1290 6
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 24 0 25 1 0 1 4 675 27 34 1290 6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 2058 2061 689 2070 2071 1294 1297 xxxx xxxxx 702 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 41 56 449 40 55 201 541 xxxx xxxxx 905 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 39 53 449 37 52 201 541 xxxx xxxxx 905 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.60 0.00 0.05 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxx 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 13.5 xxxxx xxxx 23.0 11.7 xxxx xxxxx 9.1 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * C B * * A * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 39 xxxx xxxxx 37 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:186.8 xxxx xxxxx 105.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: F * * F * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 98.3 64.4 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 401 5/5/2026
MITIG8 - 2016 + Project AM Thu May 3, 2012 10:41:29 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.794
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 29.4
Optimal Cycle: 76 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Grand Ave Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 103 865 18 109 1052 1059 195 123 469 14 282 16 Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 106 887 18 112 1078 1085 200 126 481 14 289 16 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 106 887 18 112 1078 1085 209 126 481 14 289 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 106 887 18 112 1078 1085 209 126 481 14 289 16 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 106 887 18 112 1078 1085 209 126 481 14 289 16 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 106 887 18 112 1078 1085 209 126 481 14 289 16 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.75 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.94 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 1.00 2.94 0.06 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.09 1.81 0.10 Final Sat.: 1805 5066 105 1805 3610 2842 3502 1900 2842 160 3230 183 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.30 0.38 0.06 0.07 0.17 0.09 0.09 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.07 0.41 0.41 0.14 0.48 0.48 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.11 0.11 0.11 Volume/Cap: 0.79 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.62 0.79 0.28 0.31 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Delay/Veh: 72.7 21.3 21.3 40.1 19.9 25.1 33.1 33.6 44.4 53.7 53.7 53.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 72.7 21.3 21.3 40.1 19.9 25.1 33.1 33.6 44.4 53.7 53.7 53.7 LOS by Move: E C C D B C C C D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 7 7 4 13 18 3 3 8 7 7 7
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 402 5/5/2026
2016 + Project AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:22:03 Page 7-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.571
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.3
Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: I-5 SB Ramps Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 387 0 103 251 440 0 0 1207 271
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 397 0 106 257 451 0 0 1237 278
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 397 0 106 257 460 0 0 1237 278
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 397 0 106 257 460 0 0 1237 278
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 397 0 106 257 460 0 0 1237 278
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 397 0 106 257 460 0 0 1237 278
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.89 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.45 0.55 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 3502 0 1615 3502 5187 0 0 4122 925
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.30 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.53 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.33 0.47 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.57 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.4 0.0 35.0 39.1 40.1 0.0 0.0 16.3 16.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.4 0.0 35.0 39.1 40.1 0.0 0.0 16.3 16.3 LOS by Move: A A A D A C D D A A B B
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 6 0 3 4 5 0 0 11 11
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 403 5/5/2026
2016 + Project PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:24:14 Page 2-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Santiago St/Civic Center Dr
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.579
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.9
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: B
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Civic Center Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 80 173 16 4 175 40 242 65 294 12 16 10
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 82 177 16 4 179 41 248 67 301 12 16 10
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 3
Initial Fut: 82 177 24 4 179 41 248 67 301 20 19 13
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 82 177 24 4 179 41 248 67 301 20 19 13
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 82 177 24 4 179 41 248 67 301 20 19 13
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 82 177 24 4 179 41 248 67 301 20 19 13
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.88 0.12 1.00 0.81 0.19 0.79 0.21 1.00 0.38 0.37 0.25 Final Sat.: 487 468 64 478 429 98 428 115 650 187 179 122 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.38 0.38 0.01 0.42 0.42 0.58 0.58 0.46 0.11 0.11 0.11 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Delay/Veh: 11.1 12.9 12.9 9.9 13.5 13.5 17.4 17.4 12.5 10.6 10.6 10.6 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 11.1 12.9 12.9 9.9 13.5 13.5 17.4 17.4 12.5 10.6 10.6 10.6 LOS by Move: B B B A B B C C B B B B
ApproachDel: 12.4 13.5 15.0 10.6
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdjDel: 12.4 13.5 15.0 10.6
LOS by Appr: B B B B
AllWayAvgQ: 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.6 1.2 1.2 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 404 5/5/2026
2016 + Project PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:24:14 Page 3-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.662
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: B
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 43 79 107 281 131 75 61 861 16 106 495 157
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 44 81 110 288 134 77 63 883 16 109 507 161 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 0 -5 -6 5
Initial Fut: 44 81 110 293 134 80 63 883 16 104 501 166 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 44 81 110 293 134 80 63 883 16 104 501 166
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 44 81 110 293 134 80 63 883 16 104 501 166 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 44 81 110 293 134 80 63 883 16 104 501 166 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 3338 62 1700 3400 1700 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.17 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.26 0.26 0.06 0.15 0.10 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 405 5/5/2026
2016 + Project PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:24:15 Page 4-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.8] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Logan St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1322 0 0 732 8
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1355 0 0 750 8
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 -14 0 5 0 0 8 -8
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1360 0 0 758 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1360 0 0 758 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1360 0 0 758 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 253 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 753 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 753 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.8 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * A * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 9.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * A * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 406 5/5/2026
2016 + Project PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:24:15 Page 5-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SARTC Drwy/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SARTC Drwy Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 99 0 0 0 0 1230 34 0 752 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 1261 35 0 771 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 8 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 1266 35 0 779 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 1266 35 0 779 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 1266 35 0 779 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 439 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 571 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 571 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.18 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.6 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 12.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 12.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: B * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 407 5/5/2026
2016 + Project PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:24:15 Page 6-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[357.1] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Fuller St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 25 0 84 16 1 6 7 1305 15 14 719 3
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 26 0 86 16 1 6 7 1338 15 14 737 3
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 26 0 86 16 1 6 7 1343 15 14 737 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 26 0 86 16 1 6 7 1343 15 14 737 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 26 0 86 16 1 6 7 1343 15 14 737 3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 2135 2133 1350 2175 2140 739 740 xxxx xxxxx 1358 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 36 50 186 34 50 421 876 xxxx xxxxx 513 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 34 48 186 18 48 421 876 xxxx xxxxx 513 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.75 0.00 0.46 0.93 0.02 0.01 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxx 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 40.1 xxxxx xxxx 13.7 9.1 xxxx xxxxx 12.2 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * E * * B A * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 34 xxxx xxxxx 18 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 2.6 xxxx xxxxx 2.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:251.6 xxxx xxxxx 478.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: F * * F * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 88.6 357.1 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 408 5/5/2026
2016 + Project PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:24:15 Page 7-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.533
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.8
Optimal Cycle: 43 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: I-5 SB Ramps Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 304 0 95 719 711 0 0 630 199
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 312 0 97 737 729 0 0 646 204
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 312 0 97 737 734 0 0 646 204
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 312 0 97 737 734 0 0 646 204
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 312 0 97 737 734 0 0 646 204
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 312 0 97 737 734 0 0 646 204
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.28 0.72 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 3502 0 1615 3502 5187 0 0 3800 1200
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.06 0.21 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.36 0.53 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.53 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.1 0.0 37.8 23.6 21.5 0.0 0.0 28.3 28.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.1 0.0 37.8 23.6 21.5 0.0 0.0 28.3 28.3 LOS by Move: A A A D A D C C A A C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 5 0 3 9 6 0 0 8 8
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 409 5/5/2026
MITIG8 - 2016 + Project PM Thu May 3, 2012 10:41:59 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Opening Year 2016 plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.618
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.7
Optimal Cycle: 50 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Grand Ave Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 158 1612 19 45 587 423 357 212 338 32 149 67
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 Initial Bse: 162 1652 19 46 602 434 366 217 346 33 153 69 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 162 1652 19 46 602 434 371 217 346 33 153 69 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 162 1652 19 46 602 434 371 217 346 33 153 69 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 162 1652 19 46 602 434 371 217 346 33 153 69 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 162 1652 19 46 602 434 371 217 346 33 153 69 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.75 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.91 0.91 0.91 Lanes: 1.00 2.97 0.03 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.26 1.20 0.54 Final Sat.: 1805 5116 60 1805 3610 2842 3502 1900 2842 444 2070 931 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.32 0.32 0.03 0.17 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.07 0.07 0.07 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.20 0.52 0.52 0.04 0.37 0.37 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.12 0.12 Volume/Cap: 0.45 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.45 0.42 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 Delay/Veh: 36.3 17.3 17.3 61.9 24.3 24.0 36.9 38.7 38.8 44.7 44.7 44.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 36.3 17.3 17.3 61.9 24.3 24.0 36.9 38.7 38.8 44.7 44.7 44.7 LOS by Move: D B B E C C D D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 14 14 2 8 6 5 6 6 5 5 5
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 410 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

APPENDIX I
FUTURE YEAR + PROJECT

LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 411 5/5/2026
2035 + Project AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:12:13 Page 2-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Santiago St/Civic Center Dr
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.565
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: A
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Civic Center Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Permitted Protected Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 235 441 36 5 700 117 150 56 199 66 58 15
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 235 441 36 5 700 117 150 56 199 66 58 15
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 4 4
Initial Fut: 235 441 44 5 700 117 150 56 199 79 62 19
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 235 441 44 5 700 117 150 56 199 79 62 19
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 235 441 44 5 700 117 150 56 199 79 62 19
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 235 441 44 5 700 117 150 56 199 79 62 19
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.91 0.09 0.01 1.71 0.28 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.77 0.24 Final Sat.: 1700 1546 154 21 2895 484 1700 1700 1700 1679 1318 404 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.09 0.03 0.12 0.05 0.05 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 412 5/5/2026
2035 + Project AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:12:13 Page 3-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.771
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 61 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 60 223 111 406 252 328 171 584 30 144 1087 458 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 60 223 111 406 252 328 171 584 30 144 1087 458 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 9 0 4 0 0 0 -9 -8 4
Initial Fut: 60 223 111 415 252 332 171 584 30 135 1079 462 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 60 223 111 415 252 332 171 584 30 135 1079 462 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 60 223 111 415 252 332 171 584 30 135 1079 462 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 60 223 111 415 252 332 171 584 30 135 1079 462 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1700 1700 1700 3400 1700 1700 1700 3234 166 1700 3400 1700 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.13 0.07 0.12 0.15 0.20 0.10 0.18 0.18 0.08 0.32 0.27 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 413 5/5/2026
2035 + Project AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:12:13 Page 4-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 0.0] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Logan St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 1102 0 0 1656 9
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 1102 0 0 1656 9
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 -24 0 0 0 0 9 -9
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1102 0 0 1665 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1102 0 0 1665 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1102 0 0 1665 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 555 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 480 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 480 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 414 5/5/2026
2035 + Project AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:12:14 Page 5-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SARTC Drwy/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SARTC Drwy Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 581 39 0 1201 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 581 39 0 1201 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 -13 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 590 39 0 1188 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 590 39 0 1188 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 590 39 0 1188 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 216 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 795 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 795 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 9.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * A * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 9.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: A * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 415 5/5/2026
2035 + Project AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:12:14 Page 6-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 11.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[595.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Fuller St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 25 0 26 1 0 1 4 1070 28 36 1611 7
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 25 0 26 1 0 1 4 1070 28 36 1611 7
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 25 0 26 1 0 1 4 1079 28 36 1611 7
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 25 0 26 1 0 1 4 1079 28 36 1611 7
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 25 0 26 1 0 1 4 1079 28 36 1611 7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 2788 2791 1093 2801 2802 1615 1618 xxxx xxxxx 1107 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 12 19 263 12 19 130 408 xxxx xxxxx 638 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 12 18 263 10 17 130 408 xxxx xxxxx 638 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 2.17 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.01 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.06 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.3 xxxx xxxx 0.0 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 20.2 xxxxx xxxx 33.0 13.9 xxxx xxxxx 11.0 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * C * * D B * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 12 xxxx xxxxx 10 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 4.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 1194 xxxx xxxxx 391.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: F * * F * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 595.7 212.4 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 416 5/5/2026
2035 + Project AM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:12:14 Page 7-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.779
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 31.8
Optimal Cycle: 73 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: I-5 SB Ramps Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 489 0 133 412 861 0 0 1521 383
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 489 0 133 412 861 0 0 1521 383
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 489 0 133 412 870 0 0 1521 383
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 489 0 133 412 870 0 0 1521 383
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 489 0 133 412 870 0 0 1521 383
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 489 0 133 412 870 0 0 1521 383
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.40 0.60 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 3502 0 1615 3502 5187 0 0 4019 1012
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.08 0.12 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.38 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.18 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.49 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.46 0.55 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.78 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.4 0.0 37.9 35.7 40.6 0.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.4 0.0 37.9 35.7 40.6 0.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 LOS by Move: A A A D A D D D A A C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 9 0 4 6 10 0 0 18 18
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 417 5/5/2026
MITIG8 - 2035 + Project AM Thu May 3, 2012 10:43:16 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.861
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 32.1
Optimal Cycle: 94 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Grand Ave Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Ovl Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 3 1 0 1 0 3 0 2 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 106 1091 40 236 1782 1218 431 201 608 18 353 39 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 106 1091 40 236 1782 1218 431 201 608 18 353 39 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 106 1091 40 236 1782 1218 440 201 608 18 353 39 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 106 1091 40 236 1782 1218 440 201 608 18 353 39 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 106 1091 40 236 1782 1218 440 201 608 18 353 39 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 106 1091 40 236 1782 1218 440 201 608 18 353 39 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.91 0.75 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.93 0.93 0.93 Lanes: 1.00 3.86 0.14 1.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.09 1.72 0.19 Final Sat.: 1805 6638 243 1805 5187 2842 3502 1900 2842 156 3058 338 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.34 0.43 0.13 0.11 0.21 0.12 0.12 0.12 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.07 0.32 0.32 0.25 0.50 0.50 0.18 0.18 0.25 0.13 0.13 0.13 Volume/Cap: 0.86 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.69 0.86 0.70 0.59 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Delay/Veh: 88.3 28.3 28.3 33.4 20.0 27.7 41.9 40.2 46.5 57.1 57.1 57.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 88.3 28.3 28.3 33.4 20.0 27.7 41.9 40.2 46.5 57.1 57.1 57.1 LOS by Move: F C C C C C D D D E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 8 8 7 16 22 6 5 10 9 9 9
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 418 5/5/2026
2035 + Project PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:14:19 Page 2-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Santiago St/Civic Center Dr
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.619
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 49 Level Of Service: B
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Civic Center Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Permitted Protected Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 89 557 30 7 492 71 338 68 404 22 15 18
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 89 557 30 7 492 71 338 68 404 22 15 18
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 3
Initial Fut: 89 557 38 7 492 71 338 68 404 30 18 21
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 89 557 38 7 492 71 338 68 404 30 18 21
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 89 557 38 7 492 71 338 68 404 30 18 21
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 89 557 38 7 492 71 338 68 404 30 18 21
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.94 0.06 0.02 1.73 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.52 0.61 Final Sat.: 1700 1591 109 42 2935 424 1700 1700 1700 1478 887 1035 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.35 0.35 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.20 0.04 0.24 0.02 0.02 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 419 5/5/2026
2035 + Project PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:14:19 Page 3-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Santiago St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.773
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 61 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santiago St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 72 249 171 362 264 190 215 1111 42 140 663 258 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 72 249 171 362 264 190 215 1111 42 140 663 258 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 0 -5 -6 5
Initial Fut: 72 249 171 367 264 193 215 1111 42 135 657 263 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 72 249 171 367 264 193 215 1111 42 135 657 263 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 72 249 171 367 264 193 215 1111 42 135 657 263 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 72 249 171 367 264 193 215 1111 42 135 657 263 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.93 0.07 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1700 1700 1700 3400 1700 1700 1700 3276 124 1700 3400 1700 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.15 0.10 0.11 0.16 0.11 0.13 0.34 0.34 0.08 0.19 0.15 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 420 5/5/2026
2035 + Project PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:14:19 Page 4-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Logan St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 0.0] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Logan St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 1644 0 0 1036 9
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 1644 0 0 1036 9
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 -16 0 5 0 0 9 -9
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1649 0 0 1045 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1649 0 0 1045 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1649 0 0 1045 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 348 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 654 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 654 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: * * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 421 5/5/2026
2035 + Project PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:14:20 Page 5-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 SARTC Drwy/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 14.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SARTC Drwy Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 1607 37 0 1061 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 1607 37 0 1061 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 8 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 1612 37 0 1069 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 1612 37 0 1069 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 1612 37 0 1069 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 556 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 480 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 480 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.23 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.9 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 14.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * * * * * * * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 14.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: B * * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 422 5/5/2026
2035 + Project PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:14:20 Page 6-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Fuller St/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 49.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[3706.1] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Fuller St Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 27 0 92 18 1 7 8 1619 17 16 1176 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 27 0 92 18 1 7 8 1619 17 16 1176 3
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 27 0 92 18 1 7 8 1624 17 16 1176 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 27 0 92 18 1 7 8 1624 17 16 1176 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FinalVolume: 27 0 92 18 1 7 8 1624 17 16 1176 3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 2862 2860 1633 2904 2867 1178 1179 xxxx xxxxx 1641 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 11 17 126 10 17 235 600 xxxx xxxxx 400 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 10 16 126 3 16 235 600 xxxx xxxxx 400 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 2.82 0.00 0.73 6.85 0.06 0.03 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxx 0.1 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 86.5 xxxxx xxxx 20.8 11.1 xxxx xxxxx 14.4 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * F * * C B * * B * *
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 10 xxxx xxxxx 3 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 4.5 xxxx xxxxx 3.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 1595 xxxx xxxxx 5064 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: F * * F * * * * * * * *
ApproachDel: 428.8 3706.1 xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS: F F * *
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 423 5/5/2026
2035 + Project PM Mon Mar 5, 2012 13:14:20 Page 7-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 Plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 I-5 SB Ramps/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.731
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 30.7
Optimal Cycle: 64 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Street Name: I-5 SB Ramps Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 0 0 388 0 193 968 909 0 0 1001 245
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 388 0 193 968 909 0 0 1001 245
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 388 0 193 968 914 0 0 1001 245
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 388 0 193 968 914 0 0 1001 245
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 388 0 193 968 914 0 0 1001 245
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 388 0 193 968 914 0 0 1001 245
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.41 0.59 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 3502 0 1615 3502 5187 0 0 4042 989
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.12 0.28 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.34 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.73 0.73 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.73 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.6 0.0 49.8 28.9 23.7 0.0 0.0 30.7 30.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.6 0.0 49.8 28.9 23.7 0.0 0.0 30.7 30.7 LOS by Move: A A A D A D C C A A C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 7 0 7 13 7 0 0 12 12
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 424 5/5/2026
MITIG8 - 2035 + Project PM Thu May 3, 2012 10:43:55 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation
Future 2035 plus Project Conditions
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Grand Ave/Santa Ana Blvd
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.910
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 37.8
Optimal Cycle: 115 Level Of Service: D
******************************************************************************** Street Name: Grand Ave Santa Ana Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Ovl Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 3 1 0 1 0 3 0 2 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 225 2298 93 171 917 670 486 468 418 87 187 109 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 225 2298 93 171 917 670 486 468 418 87 187 109 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project: 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 225 2298 93 171 917 670 491 468 418 87 187 109 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 225 2298 93 171 917 670 491 468 418 87 187 109 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 225 2298 93 171 917 670 491 468 418 87 187 109 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 225 2298 93 171 917 670 491 468 418 87 187 109 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.91 0.75 0.92 1.00 0.75 0.90 0.90 0.90 Lanes: 1.00 3.84 0.16 1.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.45 0.98 0.57 Final Sat.: 1805 6607 267 1805 5187 2842 3502 1900 2842 776 1668 972 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.35 0.35 0.09 0.18 0.24 0.14 0.25 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.11 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.38 0.38 0.10 0.32 0.32 0.27 0.27 0.44 0.12 0.12 0.12 Volume/Cap: 0.74 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.56 0.74 0.52 0.91 0.34 0.91 0.91 0.91 Delay/Veh: 48.9 34.5 34.5 85.5 28.7 33.7 31.4 55.5 18.6 66.8 66.8 66.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 48.9 34.5 34.5 85.5 28.7 33.7 31.4 55.5 18.6 66.8 66.8 66.8 LOS by Move: D C C F C C C E B E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 23 23 8 9 12 6 16 5 9 9 9
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AECOM, LOS ANGELES EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 425 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

APPENDIX J

CONSTRUCTION PHASING FIGURES
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 426 5/5/2026

EXHIBIT
2 City Council 22 – 427 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

APPENDIX K

RAIL-HIGHWAY DELAY CALCULATIONS
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 428 5/5/2026
Total Gate Blockage Time
TERMS
TB = total blockage time per train in minutes
L = length of train in feet (assumed to be 4500 feet)
w = roadway width at crossing in feet
v = train speed in feet per second (assumed to be 45 mph for 66 fps) INPUTS
L = 4500 feet
w = 85 feet
v = 66 feet per second
Location Existing Opening Year 2016 Future Year 2035
Crossing @ Santa Ana Blvd 71 71 71
Total Blockage Time
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 429 5/5/2026
Vehicle Delay (Daily and Peak-Hour)
TERMS
Delay = Total minutes of vehicle delay
TB = The length of time the crossing is blocked by the train q = Vehicle arrival rate, vehicles per minute (calculated based on peak hour volumes) d = Vehicle departure rate, vehicles per minute (assumed to be 1,520 vphpl) INPUTS 2011 2016 2035
TB = 1.2 1.2 1.2 minutes
qDaily = 25.25 25.22 25.16 vehicles per minute
dDaily = 25.33 25.33 25.33 vehicles per minute
qAM = 24.85 24.74 24.58 vehicles per minute
dAM= 25.33 25.33 25.33 vehicles per minute
qPM = 25.06 24.98 24.92 vehicles per minute
dPM= 25.33 25.33 25.33 vehicles per minute
Location Duration Existing Opening Year Future Year
Crossing @ Santa Ana Blvd Daily 0.10 0.13 0.20
Crossing @ Santa Ana Blvd AM Peak Hour 0.28 0.34 0.43
Crossing @ Santa Ana Blvd PM Peak Hour 0.32 0.41 0.48
Vehicle Delay
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 430 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

APPENDIX L

RAIL-HIGHWAY SAFETY CALCULATIONS
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 431 5/5/2026
Safety Assessment
TERMS
H = The calculated hazard index
V = The average twenty-four hour traffic volume
T = The average twenty-four hour train volume
Pf = The protection factor (0.11 for automatic gates)
INPUTS
V2011 = 19607
T2011 = 66
V2016 = 20092
T2016 = 71
V2035 = 30916
T2035 = 105
Pf = 0.11
Location Existing Opening Year Future Year
Crossing @ Santa Ana Blvd 142 157 357
Hazard Index
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 432 5/5/2026
Santa Ana Boulevard
Grade Separation Project
Traffic/Circulation Study – Final May 18, 2012

APPENDIX M

CPUC PRIORITY INDEX CALCULATIONS
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 433 5/5/2026
CPUC Priority Index
TERMS
V = Average 24-Hour Vehicular Volume (1 pint per vehicle) T = Average 24-Hour Train Volume (1 point per train)
C = Project Cost Share to be Allocated (1 point per thousand dollars) LRT = Average 24-Hour LRT Volume (1 point per train)
AH = Accident History (up to 3 points per accident)
SCF = Special Conditions Factor = BD+VS+RS+CG+PT+OF (up to 63 points) BD = Crossing Blocking Delay (up to 5 points)
VS = Vehicular Speed Limit (up to 5 points)
RS = Railroad Prevailing Maximum Speed ( up to 7 points) CG = Crossing Geometrics (up to 17 points)
PT = Passenger Trains (up to 10 points)
OF =
INPUTS 2011 Assumptions
V = 19607
T = 66
C = 1250 $1.25 million cost
LRT = 0 None
AH = 0 None
SCF = 21
BD = 2
VS = 1 35 mph
RS = 3 50 mph
CG = 6
PT = 7 42 passenger trains through crossing
OF = 2
CPUC
Priority
Index
Location 2011
Crossing @ Santa Ana Blvd 1056.2
Other Factors: passenger buses, school buses, carrying haz materials, and community impact (up to 19 points)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 434 5/5/2026

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
ATK
SCAX
060087
XXX
026702V 01/25/00 06:22 PM
Amtrak [ATK ]
Southern California Regional Rail Authority

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code SANTA ANA WSD ORANGE 06 CA

11. City (if in a city) SANTA ANA 12. Highway Name or No. SANTA ANA BLVD Public Private Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved

13. Type Code Code C. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify) K

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)

7. Light loco(s) (standing)
(specify)
2 0
Code
1 15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
2 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
1 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4 Code
4 1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 50

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code
3 1. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
2 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN TWO

27. FRA Track
Class
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of
Cars
5 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
39 mph
Code
Units E. Estimated R 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman
Crossing 8. Stop signs

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
2 01 03 06 07

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
1 3

1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age

39. Driver's Code
2 1. Male

2. Female 48

40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)

41. Driver Code
Gender
Warning
20 sec warn min (1);

42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a.

Name Of
1b.

Alphabetic Code
Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $0 1
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew) 98

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle? Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
TRAIN 782 STRUCK A PEDESTRIAN WALKING ON TRACK GUAGE AT SANTA ANA BLVD. CROSSING IN SANTA ANA, CA.

A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 435 5/5/2026

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
ATK
ATSF
ATSF
112881A
311181204
311181204
026702V 11/28/81 02:20 PM
Amtrak [ATK ]
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rwy Co. [ATSF]
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rwy Co. [ATSF]

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code SANTA ANA ORANGE 06 CA

11. City (if in a city) SANTA ANA 12. Highway Name or No. SANTA ANA BLVD Public Private Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved

13. Type Code Code C. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify) A

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)

7. Light loco(s) (standing)
(specify)
1 30
Code
1 15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
2 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
3 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
2 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4 Code

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 50

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code
1 1. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
2 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name
MAIN

27. FRA Track
Class
3 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of
Cars
5 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
30 mph
Code
Units E. Estimated R 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman
Crossing 8. Stop signs

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
01 03

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
1 2

1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 2 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female

40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify) 1

41. Driver Code
Gender
Warning
20 sec warn min (1);

42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a.

Name Of
1b.

Alphabetic Code
Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3 47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $2,300 0
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 0

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 436 5/5/2026

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
ATSF
ATK
ATSF
311181204
112881A
311181204
026702V 11/28/81 02:20 PM
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rwy Co. [ATSF]
Amtrak [ATK ]
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rwy Co. [ATSF]

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code SANTA ANA ORANGE 06 CA

11. City (if in a city) SANTA ANA 12. Highway Name or No. SANTA ANA BLVD Public Private Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved

13. Type Code Code C. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify) A

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)

7. Light loco(s) (standing)
(specify)
1 35
Code
1 15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
2 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
3 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
2 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4 Code

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 50

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code
1 1. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
2 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name
MAIN

27. FRA Track
Class
3 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of
Cars
5 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
30 mph
Code
Units E. Estimated R 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman
Crossing 8. Stop signs

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
01 03

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
1 2

1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 2 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female

40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify) 1

41. Driver Code
Gender
Warning
20 sec warn min (1);

42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a.

Name Of
1b.

Alphabetic Code
Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3 47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $2,300 0
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 437 5/5/2026

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
ATSF
ATK
ATSF
31019102
010579A
31019102
026702V 01/05/79 09:18 AM
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rwy Co. [ATSF]
Amtrak [ATK ]
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rwy Co. [ATSF]

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code SANTA ANA ORANGE 06 CA

11. City (if in a city) SANTA ANA 12. Highway Name or No. SANTA ANA BLVD Public Private Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved

13. Type Code Code C. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify) A

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)

7. Light loco(s) (standing)
(specify)
1 25
Code
1 15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
2 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
3 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
2 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4 Code

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 49

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code
2 1. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
2 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN TRACK

27. FRA Track
Class
2 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of
Cars
4 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
40 mph
Code
Units E. Estimated E 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman
Crossing 8. Stop signs

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
01 1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
1 2

1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 2 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female

40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify) 1

41. Driver Code
Gender
Warning
20 sec warn min (1);

42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a.

Name Of
1b.

Alphabetic Code
Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3 47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $900 0
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 1
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 438 5/5/2026

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
ATK
ATSF
ATSF
010579A
31019102
31019102
026702V 01/05/79 09:18 AM
Amtrak [ATK ]
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rwy Co. [ATSF]
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rwy Co. [ATSF]

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code SANTA ANNA ORANGE 06 CA

11. City (if in a city) SANTA ANNA 12. Highway Name or No. SANTA ANNA BLVD Public Private Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved

13. Type Code Code C. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify) A

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)

7. Light loco(s) (standing)
(specify)
1 25
Code
1 15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
2 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
3 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
2 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4 Code

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 49

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code
2 1. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
2 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name
MAIN

27. FRA Track
Class
2 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of
Cars
4 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
40 mph
Code
Units E. Estimated E 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman
Crossing 8. Stop signs

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
01 1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
1 2

1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 2 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female

40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify) 1

41. Driver Code
Gender
Warning
20 sec warn min (1);

42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a.

Name Of
1b.

Alphabetic Code
Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3 47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $900 0
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 1
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 22 – 439 5/5/2026

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
ATSF
ATSF
31127101
31127101
026702V 12/15/77 10:10 PM
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rwy Co. [ATSF]
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rwy Co. [ATSF]

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code SANTA ANA LOS ANGELES 06 CA

11. City (if in a city) SANTA ANA 12. Highway Name or No. SANTA ANA BLVD Public Private Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved

13. Type Code Code C. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify) A

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)

7. Light loco(s) (standing)
(specify)
1 0
Code
4 15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
2 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
1 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4 Code

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 52

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code
1 1. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN TRACK

27. FRA Track
Class
4 28. Number of
Locomotive
4 29. Number of
Cars
83 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
20 mph
Code
Units E. Estimated E 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman
Crossing 8. Stop signs

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
01 03

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
1 2

1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age