17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75
0 74 0 0 74
0 73 0 0 73
0 Between: Wind River Road / Grapewin Street - Schleisman Road 72 0 0 72
0 71 0 0 71
0 70 0 0 70
0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69
0 68 0 0 68
0 67 0 0 67
0 Date:
66 0 0 66
0 65 0 0 65
0 64 0 0 64
0 Time
63 0 0 63
0 From: 9:40
62 1 0 62
X1
61 0 0 61
0 Time
60 4 2 60
XXXXXX6 To: 10:05
59 1 3 59
XXXX4
58 1 1 58
XX2 Existing
57 3 2 57
XXXXX5
* Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 3 2 56
XXXXX5
*
55 3 3 55
XXXXXX6
*
54 4 4 54
XXXXXXXX8
P
53 2 1 53
XXX3
A
52 1 3 52
XXXX4
C
51 2 9 51
XXXXXXXXXXX 11
E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics
50 7 3 50
XXXXXXXXXX 10
* % Over Pace: 14% 12% 13%
49 5 4 49
XXXXXXXXX9
*
48 3 6 48
XXXXXXXXX9
* % In Pace: 66% 74% 70%
47 3 2 47
XXXXX5
46 3 1 46
XXXX4 % Under Pace: 20% 14% 17%
45 2 2 45
XXXX4
44 0 0 44
0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH
43 1 1 43
XX2
42 1 0 42
X1 Pace Speed: 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH
41 0 1 41
X1
40 0 0 40
0 39 0 0 39
0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 38 0 0 38
0 37 0 0 37
0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 36 0 0 36
0 35 0 0 35
0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 57 MPH 57 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34
0 33 0 0 33
0 32 0 0 32
0 31 0 0 31
0 30 0 0 30
0 29 0 0 29
0 28 0 0 28
0 27 0 0 27
0 26 0 0 26
0 25 0 0 25
0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
9/14/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Bellegrave Avenue / North City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 1 3 59 X X X X 458 4 0 58 X X X X 457 0 2 57 X X 2 Date:56 0 1 56 X 155 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 * 54 2 5 54 X X X X X X X 7 * Time
53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 * From: 11:0552 2 2 52 X X X X 4 P 51 3 5 51 X X X X X X X X 8 A Time
50 5 3 50 X X X X X X X X 8 C To: 11:3049 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E 48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 *45 6 1 45 X X X X X X X 7
44 1 3 44 X X X X 443 1 0 43 X 142 1 0 42 X 141 0 0 41 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 20% 12% 11%39 0 0 39 038 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 74% 80% 76%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 8% 13%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 50 MPH 50 MPH 50 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 45 - 54 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 46 - 55 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 55 MPH 55 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Baron Road
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - River Road52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 0 0 46 045 0 1 45 X 144 1 1 44 X X 2 Time43 4 1 43 X X X X X 5 From: 9:0042 2 2 42 X X X X 441 0 2 41 X X 2 Time40 1 2 40 X X X 3 To: 10:0039 1 2 39 X X X 338 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 Existing37 1 2 37 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 35 MPH 36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 *35 6 0 35 X X X X X X 6 *34 2 1 34 X X X 3 *33 6 4 33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P 32 0 1 32 X 1 A31 8 3 31 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 3 4 30 X X X X X X X 7 E % Over Pace: 24% 36% 28%29 2 5 29 X X X X X X X 7 * 28 4 4 28 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 72% 64% 65%
27 3 5 27 X X X X X X X X 8 *
26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 4% 0% 7%
25 2 4 25 X X X X X X 624 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 25 - 34 MPH 27 - 36 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 31 MPH 33 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:4062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 0 0 60 0 To: 10:5559 0 0 59 058 2 0 58 X X 2 Existing57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 50 MPH 56 2 0 56 X X 2
55 3 2 55 X X X X X 554 0 3 54 X X X 3 *
53 3 2 53 X X X X X 5 *52 5 6 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *51 7 6 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 4 3 50 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 14% 4% 9%49 3 6 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 C 48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % In Pace: 76% 84% 78%
47 2 4 47 X X X X X X 6 *
46 6 3 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Under Pace: 10% 12% 13% 45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6 *
44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 49 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH
43 3 2 43 X X X X X 542 1 1 42 X X 2 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 45 - 54 MPH41 0 1 41 X 140 1 0 40 X 139 0 1 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 52 MPH 53 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 9:2052 3 4 52 X X X X X X X 751 2 1 51 X X X 3 Time50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 9:4049 0 1 49 X 148 5 2 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH 46 5 6 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5 P 44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 A43 9 8 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C 42 4 1 42 X X X X X 5 E
41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%39 0 5 39 X X X X X 5 * 38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 78% 77%
37 2 2 37 X X X X 436 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 10%35 1 1 35 X X 234 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Blossom Way
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Sumner Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 0 0 46 045 0 0 45 044 0 0 44 0 Time43 0 0 43 0 From: 12:1042 1 0 42 X 141 1 0 41 X 1 Time40 1 0 40 X 1 To: 12:5039 2 0 39 X X 238 1 3 38 X X X X 4 Existing37 2 5 37 X X X X X X X 7 Speed Limit: 30 MPH 36 2 1 36 X X X 3 *35 5 4 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *34 6 7 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *33 3 5 33 X X X X X X X X 8 P 32 5 6 32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A31 3 4 31 X X X X X X X 7 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 3 2 30 X X X X X 5 E % Over Pace: 16% 0% 16%29 3 2 29 X X X X X 5 * 28 3 3 28 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 76% 78% 76%
27 5 4 27 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 8% 22% 8%
25 2 2 25 X X X X 424 1 0 24 X 1 Average Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH23 1 0 23 X 122 0 1 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 27 - 36 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 27 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Chandler Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Harrison Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 1 57 X 1 Date:56 1 5 56 X X X X X X 655 0 1 55 X 154 0 2 54 X X 2 Time53 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 From: 9:4052 1 1 52 X X 251 1 1 51 X X 2 Time50 4 6 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * To: 10:1549 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 * 48 4 3 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 5 4 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
45 4 2 45 X X X X X X 6 C44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 E43 2 1 43 X X X 3 * 42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 0 2 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 14% 24% 19%39 2 1 39 X X X 338 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 70% 68% 69%37 0 0 37 036 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 12%35 1 0 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 48 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 54 MPH 52 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/22/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 1 0 55 X 154 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:4052 2 0 52 X X 251 2 0 51 X X 2 Time50 2 1 50 X X X 3 * To: 2:0049 1 1 49 X X 2 * 48 3 2 48 X X X X X 5 * Existing
47 6 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 A
45 8 9 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C
44 3 5 44 X X X X X X X X 8 E
43 6 5 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
42 6 8 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 0% 5%39 1 1 39 X X 238 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 80% 90% 85%37 1 0 37 X 136 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 10% 10%35 0 0 35 034 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Fieldmaster Street
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Hall Road - Archibald Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 1 50 X 1 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 1 0 48 X 147 1 1 47 X X 2 Date:46 0 3 46 X X X 345 3 0 45 X X X 344 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 * Time43 5 1 43 X X X X X X 6 * From: 1:3042 1 3 42 X X X X 4 * 41 3 6 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Time
40 4 1 40 X X X X X 5 A To: 2:2039 3 6 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 C 38 8 9 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 E Existing 37 2 5 37 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
36 3 2 36 X X X X X 5 *35 5 3 35 X X X X X X X X 8 *34 1 0 34 X 1 33 3 2 33 X X X X X 532 2 0 32 X X 231 2 4 31 X X X X X X 6 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 0 1 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 10% 10% 10%29 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 74% 76% 75%27 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 14% 15%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Goodman Avenue
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road - Hamner Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 2 0 49 X X 248 1 0 48 X 147 2 0 47 X X 2 Date:46 2 2 46 X X X X 445 0 0 45 044 3 0 44 X X X 3 Time43 2 0 43 X X 2 From: 10:4542 2 3 42 X X X X X 541 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 Time40 2 3 40 X X X X X 5 * To: 11:5539 2 4 39 X X X X X X 6 * 38 1 2 38 X X X 3 * Existing
37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 6 P Speed Limit: N / P MPH
36 5 3 36 X X X X X X X X 8 A
35 3 4 35 X X X X X X X 7 C
34 3 4 34 X X X X X X X 7 E
33 3 2 33 X X X X X 5 *
32 6 4 32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *31 0 8 31 X X X X X X X X 8 * Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics 30 2 2 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 16% 28% 25%29 1 0 29 X 128 1 1 28 X X 2 % In Pace: 76% 60% 65%27 1 0 27 X 126 1 1 26 X X 2 % Under Pace: 8% 12% 10%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 31 - 40 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 31 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 34 MPH 35 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 40 MPH 41 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Citrus Street - South City Limits72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 1:2062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 0 0 60 0 To: 1:4059 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 0 Existing57 1 0 57 X 1 Speed Limit: 50 MPH 56 0 1 56 X 1
55 1 0 55 X 154 4 2 54 X X X X X X 653 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 * 52 4 2 52 X X X X X X 6 *51 1 2 51 X X X 3 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 5 2 50 X X X X X X X 7 P % Over Pace: 2% 8% 9%49 5 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A 48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 C % In Pace: 80% 84% 80%
47 4 2 47 X X X X X X 6 E
46 8 8 46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 * % Under Pace: 18% 8% 11% 45 1 10 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
44 4 5 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Average Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH 43 2 3 43 X X X X X 542 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH41 0 3 41 X X X 340 1 0 40 X 139 1 0 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH38 0 1 38 X 137 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Limonite Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 1 55 X 154 0 1 54 X 1 Time53 3 1 53 X X X X 4 From: 11:5052 1 2 52 X X X 351 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Time50 1 4 50 X X X X X 5 * To: 12:1049 2 3 49 X X X X X 5 * 48 5 1 48 X X X X X X 6 P Existing
47 4 5 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 2 7 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
45 7 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
44 4 1 44 X X X X X 5 *
43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *42 7 4 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *41 1 3 41 X X X X 4 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 8% 10% 9%39 1 2 39 X X X 338 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 74% 75%37 0 0 37 036 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 16% 16%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Bellegrave Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 1 54 X 1 Time53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 From: 9:0052 1 3 52 X X X X 451 6 3 51 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Time50 0 0 50 0 * To: 9:2049 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * 48 8 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 5 5 46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
45 3 2 45 X X X X X 5 E
44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *42 4 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 0 3 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 18% 9%39 2 0 39 X X 238 2 2 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 78% 77%37 1 0 37 X 136 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 16% 4% 14%35 1 0 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 1 63 X 1 Between: Bellegrave Avenue - Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road62 1 1 62 X X 261 0 0 61 060 1 1 60 X X 2 Weather: Clear59 1 1 59 X X 258 1 0 58 X 157 3 2 57 X X X X X 5 Date:56 3 3 56 X X X X X X 655 3 1 55 X X X X 454 2 3 54 X X X X X 5 * Time53 4 3 53 X X X X X X X 7 * From: 10:2552 5 2 52 X X X X X X X 7 * 51 2 2 51 X X X X 4 P Time
50 1 4 50 X X X X X 5 A To: 10:4549 4 5 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 C 48 4 5 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Existing
47 3 2 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 3 6 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *45 5 1 45 X X X X X X 6 *44 1 3 44 X X X X 4 43 1 2 43 X X X 342 0 1 42 X 141 1 1 41 X X 2 Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics40 1 0 40 X 1 % Over Pace: 18% 26% 23%39 0 0 39 038 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 66% 66% 66%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 11%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 50 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 45 - 54 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 55 MPH 55 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 2 63 X X 2 Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road - Riverside Drive62 0 1 62 X 161 0 1 61 X 160 1 0 60 X 1 Weather: Clear59 0 2 59 X X 258 1 1 58 X X 257 2 3 57 X X X X X 5 Date:56 1 3 56 X X X X 455 3 4 55 X X X X X X X 7 * 54 0 2 54 X X 2 * Time
53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 * From: 11:5552 3 2 52 X X X X X 5 P 51 5 2 51 X X X X X X X 7 A Time
50 4 4 50 X X X X X X X X 8 C To: 12:1549 2 2 49 X X X X 4 E 48 3 3 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: N / P MPH
46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 *45 2 1 45 X X X 3
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 543 2 3 43 X X X X X 542 3 1 42 X X X X 441 2 1 41 X X X 3 Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics40 1 1 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 20% 16% 18%39 1 0 39 X 138 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 56% 62% 57%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 24% 22% 25%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 51 MPH 48 MPH 50 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 46 - 55 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 43 MPH 42 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 50 MPH 49 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 54 MPH 56 MPH 55 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65
0 64 1 0 64
X1
63 1 0 63
X1 Between: Riverside Drive - Philadelphia Street
62 0 0 62
0 61 0 0 61
0 60 0 1 60
X1 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59
0 58 1 2 58
XXX3
57 0 3 57
XXX3 Date:
56 1 1 56
XX2
55 2 1 55
XXX3
54 1 2 54
XXX3 Time
53 4 2 53
XXXXXX6 From: 12:45
52 2 0 52
XX2
51 2 2 51
XXXX4 Time
50 4 5 50
XXXXXXXXX9
* To: 1:05
49 2 4 49
XXXXXX6
*
48 2 5 48
XXXXXXX7
* Existing
47 4 7 47
XXXXXXXXXXX 11
P Speed Limit: N / P MPH
46 4 1 46
XXXXX5
A
45 2 0 45
XX2
C
44 1 0 44
X1
E
43 4 4 43
XXXXXXXX8
*
42 0 3 42
XXX3
*
41 5 2 41
XXXXXXX7
* Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 3 3 40
XXXXXX6 % Over Pace: 24% 30% 29%
39 1 2 39
XXX3
38 2 0 38
XX2 % In Pace: 62% 56% 59%
37 1 0 37
X1
36 0 0 36
0 % Under Pace: 14% 14% 12%
35 0 0 35
0 34 0 0 34
0 Average Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH
33 0 0 33
0 32 0 0 32
0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH
31 0 0 31
0 30 0 0 30
0 29 0 0 29
0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28
0 27 0 0 27
0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26
0 25 0 0 25
0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 54 MPH 53 MPH 24 0 0 24
0 23 0 0 23
0 22 0 0 22
0 21 0 0 21
0 20 0 0 20
0 19 0 0 19
0 18 0 0 18
0 17 0 0 17
0 16 0 0 16
0 15 0 0 15
0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Chandler Street - Schleisman Road62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 1 58 X 157 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 2 56 X X 255 1 0 55 X 154 0 3 54 X X X 3 Time53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 12:1052 1 1 52 X X 251 1 4 51 X X X X X 5 * Time50 6 5 50 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * To: 12:3049 8 3 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * 48 1 2 48 X X X 3 P Existing
47 5 6 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 4 7 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
45 6 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
43 3 1 43 X X X X 4 *42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 *41 1 1 41 X X 2 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 4% 16% 10%39 0 1 39 X 138 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 90% 80% 85%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 4% 5%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 52 MPH 50 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Blossom Way62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 1 0 54 X 1 Time53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 12:5052 2 0 52 X X 251 0 1 51 X 1 Time50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 1:2049 4 2 49 X X X X X X 648 2 1 48 X X X 3 Existing47 4 1 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 4 5 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *45 7 2 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *44 5 4 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 P 43 5 6 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A42 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 C41 3 9 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 2 40 X X X X 4 * % Over Pace: 8% 10% 15%39 3 4 39 X X X X X X X 7 * 38 2 6 38 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 74% 86% 79%
37 2 1 37 X X X 336 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 18% 4% 6%35 0 1 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hellman Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Chandler Street - River Road72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 11:1562 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 3 4 60 X X X X X X X 7 To: 12:0059 1 2 59 X X X 358 2 1 58 X X X 3 Existing57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 50 MPH 56 4 5 56 X X X X X X X X X 9 *55 3 7 55 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *54 4 4 54 X X X X X X X X 8 *53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 P 52 4 3 52 X X X X X X X 7 A51 3 8 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 5 4 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%49 6 1 49 X X X X X X X 7 * 48 2 4 48 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 76% 82% 79%
47 3 3 47 X X X X X X 6 *
46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 4% 8%
45 2 0 45 X X 244 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH43 0 1 43 X 142 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 47 - 56 MPH 47 - 56 MPH41 0 0 41 040 0 0 40 039 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 56 MPH 56 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hellman Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Scholar Avenue (Chandler Street - Limonite Avenue)72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 3:0062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 2 0 60 X X 2 To: 3:2559 0 1 59 X 158 1 2 58 X X X 3 Existing57 1 0 57 X 1 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 3 2 56 X X X X X 555 4 2 55 X X X X X X 6 * 54 4 1 54 X X X X X 5 *53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 *52 5 3 52 X X X X X X X X 8 P 51 2 4 51 X X X X X X 6 A Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 2 2 50 X X X X 4 C % Over Pace: 8% 16% 12%49 3 5 49 X X X X X X X X 8 E 48 8 3 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % In Pace: 76% 72% 69% 47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
46 2 5 46 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 16% 12% 19%
45 1 5 45 X X X X X X 644 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 Average Speed: 51 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH43 1 1 43 X X 242 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 46 - 55 MPH41 0 1 41 X 140 0 0 40 039 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 54 MPH 55 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
17.L
(in Eastvale, btwn Limonite and NCL)
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 2 59 X X 258 0 1 58 X 157 1 1 57 X X 2 Date:56 1 1 56 X X 255 2 5 55 X X X X X X X 754 4 2 54 X X X X X X 6 * Time53 1 3 53 X X X X 4 * From: 9:4552 1 4 52 X X X X X 5 * 51 0 1 51 X 1 P Time
50 2 4 50 X X X X X X 6 A To: 10:0549 1 2 49 X X X 3 C
48 7 2 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Existing
47 8 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 2 2 46 X X X X 4 *45 7 2 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *44 2 3 44 X X X X X 5 43 1 2 43 X X X 342 1 2 42 X X X 341 3 1 41 X X X X 4 Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 10% 20% 14%39 1 1 39 X X 238 0 1 38 X 1 % In Pace: 64% 68% 62%37 3 0 37 X X X 336 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 26% 12% 24%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 45 - 54 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 54 MPH 53 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - East City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 1 57 X 1 Date:56 4 1 56 X X X X X 555 2 2 55 X X X X 454 2 0 54 X X 2 Time53 5 2 53 X X X X X X X 7 * From: 10:0552 3 5 52 X X X X X X X X 8 * 51 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Time
50 2 5 50 X X X X X X X 7 P To: 10:2549 5 2 49 X X X X X X X 7 A 48 3 4 48 X X X X X X X 7 C Existing
47 8 1 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 3 4 46 X X X X X X X 7 *45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 *44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 *43 1 5 43 X X X X X X 6 42 0 4 42 X X X X 441 1 0 41 X 1 Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 12% 12% 12%39 0 0 39 038 0 2 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 74% 76% 72%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 12% 16%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 49 MPH 48 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 43 - 52 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 44 - 53 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Mission Boulevard
75 0 0 75
0 74 0 0 74
0 73 0 0 73
0 Between: Milliken Avenue - I-15 Freeway
72 0 0 72
0 71 0 0 71
0 70 0 0 70
0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69
0 68 0 0 68
0 67 0 0 67
0 Date:
66 0 0 66
0 65 0 0 65
0 64 2 1 64
XXX3 Time
63 0 1 63
X1 From: 9:30
62 0 0 62
0 61 3 2 61
XXXXX5 Time
60 6 2 60
XXXXXXXX8 To: 10:30
59 3 1 59
XXXX4
58 6 2 58
XXXXXXXX8
* Existing
57 2 3 57
XXXXX5
* Speed Limit: N / P MPH
56 4 7 56
XXXXXXXXXXX 11
*
55 4 3 55
XXXXXXX7
P
54 5 1 54
XXXXXX6
A
53 5 5 53
XXXXXXXXXX 10
C
52 5 4 52
XXXXXXXXX9
E
51 3 1 51
XXXX4
*
50 4 5 50
XXXXXXXXX9
* % Over Pace: 17%
49 2 4 49
XXXXXX6
*
48 4 2 48
XXXXXX6 % In Pace: 60%
47 2 1 47
XXX3
46 4 4 46
XXXXXXXX8 % Under Pace: 23%
45 1 1 45
XX2
44 0 0 44
0 Average Speed: 53 MPH
43 1 0 43
X1
42 0 0 42
0 Pace Speed: 49 - 58 MPH
41 2 0 41
XX2
40 0 0 40
0 39 2 0 39
XX2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH
38 3 0 38
XXX3
37 0 0 37
0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH
36 1 0 36
X1
35 0 0 35
0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 59 MPH
34 0 0 34
0 33 0 0 33
0 32 1 0 32
X1
31 0 0 31
0 30 0 0 30
0 29 0 0 29
0 28 0 0 28
0 27 0 0 27
0 26 0 0 26
0 25 0 0 25
0 Total 75 50 GRAND TOTALS 125
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Eastbound Westbound
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
6/3/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Orange Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Scholar Way62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 2:2052 1 0 52 X 151 1 0 51 X 1 Time50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 3:1549 0 1 49 X 148 1 2 48 X X X 3 Existing47 2 0 47 X X 2 Speed Limit: 30 MPH 46 3 1 46 X X X X 4
45 3 1 45 X X X X 4 *
44 1 3 44 X X X X 4 *43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 *42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 P 41 6 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 2 40 X X X X X X X 7 C % Over Pace: 10% 12% 13%39 5 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E 38 2 5 38 X X X X X X X 7 * % In Pace: 76% 80% 74%
37 4 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
36 2 5 36 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 14% 8% 13%
35 0 4 35 X X X X 434 3 1 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH33 1 2 33 X X X 332 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 37 - 46 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 36 - 45 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 1 30 X 129 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 35 MPH 36 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Prairie Smoke Road
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Whitewell Road52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 1 0 47 X 1 Date:46 1 0 46 X 145 4 2 45 X X X X X X 644 2 1 44 X X X 3 Time43 0 3 43 X X X 3 From: 9:0042 1 3 42 X X X X 441 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time40 4 2 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 10:0039 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 * 38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 * Existing
37 3 6 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 1 36 X X X 3 A
35 1 3 35 X X X X 4 C
34 0 5 34 X X X X X 5 E
33 1 2 33 X X X 3 *
32 4 5 32 X X X X X X X X X 9 *31 5 4 31 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 2 2 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 22% 20% 21%29 4 0 29 X X X X 428 1 0 28 X 1 % In Pace: 50% 66% 58%27 2 2 27 X X X X 426 2 3 26 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 28% 14% 21%25 3 0 25 X X X 324 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 31 MPH 29 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: River Road
65 0 0 65
0 64 0 0 64
0 63 0 0 63
0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Archibald Avenue
62 0 0 62
0 61 0 0 61
0 60 0 0 60
0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59
0 58 0 0 58
0 57 0 0 57
0 Date:
56 0 0 56
0 55 0 0 55
0 54 0 0 54
0 Time
53 1 2 53
XXX3 From: 9:00
52 1 0 52
X1
51 0 6 51
XXXXXX6 Time
50 2 3 50
XXXXX5
* To: 9:35
49 3 6 49
XXXXXXXXX9
*
48 7 4 48
XXXXXXXXXXX 11
* Existing
47 1 2 47
XXX3
P Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 4 4 46
XXXXXXXX8
A
45 2 3 45
XXXXX5
C
44 5 7 44
XXXXXXXXXXXX 12
E
43 7 3 43
XXXXXXXXXX 10
*
42 3 2 42
XXXXX5
*
41 4 4 41
XXXXXXXX8
* Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics
40 3 1 40
XXXX4 % Over Pace: 8% 4% 10%
39 3 0 39
XXX3
38 1 2 38
XXX3 % In Pace: 78% 80% 76%
37 0 1 37
X1
36 0 0 36
0 % Under Pace: 14% 16% 14%
35 1 0 35
X1
34 1 0 34
X1 Average Speed: 44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH
33 1 0 33
X1
32 0 0 32
0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH
31 0 0 31
0 30 0 0 30
0 29 0 0 29
0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28
0 27 0 0 27
0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH 26 0 0 26
0 25 0 0 25
0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 51 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24
0 23 0 0 23
0 22 0 0 22
0 21 0 0 21
0 20 0 0 20
0 19 0 0 19
0 18 0 0 18
0 17 0 0 17
0 16 0 0 16
0 15 0 0 15
0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
9/14/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Riverboat Drive
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Massy Harris Way - Wells Springs Street62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:1052 0 0 52 051 0 2 51 X X 2 Time50 0 0 50 0 To: 1:2049 1 2 49 X X X 348 0 1 48 X 1 Existing47 0 0 47 0 Speed Limit: 40 MPH 46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5
45 1 0 45 X 144 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 *
43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 *42 1 3 42 X X X X 4 *41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 5 40 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 12% 12% 12%39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 C 38 4 4 38 X X X X X X X X 8 E % In Pace: 66% 62% 64%
37 9 4 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *
36 4 2 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 22% 26% 24%
35 3 3 35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 2 2 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 33 2 2 33 X X X X 432 2 3 32 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH31 0 1 31 X 130 0 3 30 X X X 329 0 2 29 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH28 0 0 28 027 2 0 27 X X 2 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH26 1 0 26 X 125 2 0 25 X X 2 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Riverside Drive
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 1 0 57 X 1 Date:56 0 1 56 X 155 0 0 55 054 2 1 54 X X X 3 Time53 2 1 53 X X X 3 From: 12:1552 0 0 52 051 0 1 51 X 1 Time50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 12:4549 1 1 49 X X 248 2 2 48 X X X X 4 Existing47 2 2 47 X X X X 4 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH 46 1 3 46 X X X X 4 *45 8 6 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *44 3 1 44 X X X X 4 P 43 3 7 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A42 8 7 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C 41 2 6 41 X X X X X X X X 8 E Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 5 3 40 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Over Pace: 14% 18% 16%39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 * 38 3 3 38 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 82% 74% 78%
37 1 1 37 X X 236 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 4% 8% 6%35 1 0 35 X 134 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Archibald Avenue72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 3:3062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 2 0 60 X X 2 To: 3:5059 3 2 59 X X X X X 558 1 7 58 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing57 1 2 57 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH 56 6 4 56 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *55 4 0 55 X X X X 4 P 54 2 3 54 X X X X X 5 A53 3 4 53 X X X X X X X 7 C
52 3 7 52 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
51 1 3 51 X X X X 4 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 7 2 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 14% 4% 7%49 3 3 49 X X X X X X 6 * 48 4 4 48 X X X X X X X X 8 % In Pace: 70% 70% 66%
47 2 1 47 X X X 346 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 16% 26% 27%45 1 1 45 X X 244 2 1 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH43 2 0 43 X X 242 0 2 42 X X 2 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 49 - 58 MPH 49 - 58 MPH41 0 0 41 040 0 1 40 X 139 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 58 MPH 57 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 2 0 55 X X 254 1 0 54 X 1 Time53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 3:1552 1 3 52 X X X X 451 2 1 51 X X X 3 Time50 1 2 50 X X X 3 To: 3:3549 2 7 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 * 48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
47 6 6 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 2 5 46 X X X X X X X 7 P
45 3 4 45 X X X X X X X 7 A44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C 43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 E
42 2 1 42 X X X 3 *
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 1 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 16% 2% 15%39 2 0 39 X X 238 4 2 38 X X X X X X 6 % In Pace: 72% 84% 77%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 14% 8%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 40 - 49 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 43 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Scholar Way62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 1 1 54 X X 2 Time53 2 0 53 X X 2 From: 3:3552 0 0 52 051 1 3 51 X X X X 4 Time50 2 1 50 X X X 3 To: 3:5549 3 1 49 X X X X 448 1 2 48 X X X 3 * Existing47 7 2 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 7 3 46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *45 4 7 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P 44 3 4 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 5 2 43 X X X X X X X 7 C
42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
41 4 4 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 1 2 40 X X X 3 * % Over Pace: 8% 16% 15%39 4 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * 38 0 3 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 80% 76% 77%
37 1 2 37 X X X 336 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 8%35 0 1 35 X 134 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Scholar Way - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 1 1 57 X X 2 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 1 55 X 154 4 1 54 X X X X X 5 Time53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 10:3052 3 1 52 X X X X 451 2 6 51 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time50 4 3 50 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 10:5049 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * 48 4 5 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Existing
47 6 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 5 3 46 X X X X X X X X 8 C
45 3 6 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 *42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *41 3 1 41 X X X X 4 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 0 2 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 22% 12% 15%39 0 1 39 X 138 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 78% 80% 78%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 0% 8% 7%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Citrus Street - Schleisman Road52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 1 0 48 X 147 1 1 47 X X 2 Date:46 0 0 46 045 0 0 45 044 1 0 44 X 1 Time43 1 3 43 X X X X 4 From: 9:0042 2 3 42 X X X X X 541 0 2 41 X X 2 Time40 5 2 40 X X X X X X X 7 To: 9:2539 3 2 39 X X X X X 538 3 2 38 X X X X X 5 * Existing37 4 2 37 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH 36 2 4 36 X X X X X X 6 *35 6 2 35 X X X X X X X X 8 P
34 2 4 34 X X X X X X 6 A33 2 2 33 X X X X 4 C
32 3 3 32 X X X X X X 6 E
31 5 3 31 X X X X X X X X 8 * Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics 30 4 5 30 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 26% 12% 27%29 1 5 29 X X X X X X 6 * 28 2 1 28 X X X 3 % In Pace: 64% 70% 64%
27 1 3 27 X X X X 426 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 10% 18% 9%25 1 0 25 X 124 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 29 - 38 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 29 - 38 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 28 MPH 29 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Limonite Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 1 48 X 147 1 2 47 X X X 3 Date:46 1 0 46 X 145 1 3 45 X X X X 444 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 * Time43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 * From: 1:2042 2 3 42 X X X X X 5 * 41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Time
40 3 4 40 X X X X X X X 7 A To: 1:4039 8 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C 38 3 4 38 X X X X X X X 7 E Existing
37 5 3 37 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 4 1 36 X X X X X 5 *35 3 4 35 X X X X X X X 7 *34 0 4 34 X X X X 4 33 2 1 33 X X X 332 1 1 32 X X 231 2 1 31 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 6% 16% 9%29 2 0 29 X X 228 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 78% 76% 75%27 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 16%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 35 - 44 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Bellegrave Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 2 49 X X 248 0 1 48 X 147 0 1 47 X 1 Date:46 1 2 46 X X X 345 2 2 45 X X X X 444 2 2 44 X X X X 4 Time43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 * From: 10:2542 3 3 42 X X X X X X 6 * 41 2 6 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time
40 7 4 40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P To: 11:0039 5 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A 38 5 3 38 X X X X X X X X 8 C Existing
37 7 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E Speed Limit: 35 MPH 36 4 3 36 X X X X X X X 7 *35 3 2 35 X X X X X 5 *34 5 2 34 X X X X X X X 7 *33 1 0 33 X 1 32 1 3 32 X X X X 431 0 0 31 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics30 0 1 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 10% 12% 15%29 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 86% 72% 79%27 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 4% 16% 6%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 34 - 43 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 45 MPH 43 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Sumner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Citrus Street - 65th Street62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 3 56 X X X 355 0 1 55 X 154 0 2 54 X X 2 Time53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 2:0052 0 2 52 X X 2 * 51 5 7 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Time
50 3 4 50 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 2:2049 5 5 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P 48 6 6 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 C Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 5 1 46 X X X X X X 6 E
45 8 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
44 5 3 44 X X X X X X X X 8 *43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 *42 0 1 42 X 1 41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 2 0 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 2% 12% 9%39 1 0 39 X 138 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 86% 76% 81%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 12% 10%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 47 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 43 - 52 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 48 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 53 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Sumner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: 65th Street - Bellegrave Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 1 0 57 X 1 Date:56 0 0 56 055 1 0 55 X 154 1 0 54 X 1 Time53 3 2 53 X X X X X 5 From: 10:0052 3 2 52 X X X X X 551 3 1 51 X X X X 4 Time50 2 1 50 X X X 3 * To: 10:2549 6 10 49 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 * 48 6 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Existing
47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 A
45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 C
44 4 5 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5 *
42 2 5 42 X X X X X X X 7 *41 3 2 41 X X X X X 5 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 10% 17%39 2 1 39 X X X 338 1 0 38 X 1 % In Pace: 66% 86% 74%37 0 0 37 036 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 28% 4% 9%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 49 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
17.L
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Whitewell Road
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Prairie Smoke Road52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 1 2 46 X X X 345 2 2 45 X X X X 444 0 1 44 X 1 Time43 1 1 43 X X 2 From: 10:0042 1 3 42 X X X X 441 0 0 41 0 Time40 6 2 40 X X X X X X X X 8 To: 11:0039 1 2 39 X X X 338 4 5 38 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Existing37 3 0 37 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH 36 5 1 36 X X X X X X 6 *35 0 2 35 X X 2 P
34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 A33 6 3 33 X X X X X X X X X 9 C 32 3 3 32 X X X X X X 6 E
31 4 4 31 X X X X X X X X 8 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 1 1 30 X X 2 * % Over Pace: 10% 36% 25%29 5 7 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * 28 1 4 28 X X X X X 5 % In Pace: 72% 64% 65%
27 1 3 27 X X X X 426 1 0 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 18% 0% 10%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 29 - 38 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 29 MPH 29 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
17.L
APPENDIX F
Collision Data Sheets
Updated December 2021
17.L
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
58th Street between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions (2016-2017)
65th St between Archibald Ave and Sumner Ave
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
65th Street between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
65th Street between Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
68th Street between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
68th Street between Hamner Avenue and East City Limit
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Archibald Avenue between Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Archibald Avenue between Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Archibald Avenue between Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Baron Road between Archibald Avenue and Northerly Terminus July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Bellegrave Avenue between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Bellegrave Avenue between Hamner Avenue and East City Limit July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Blossom Way between Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Chandler Street between Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Hamner Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP (Continued on Next Page)
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Hamner Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
(Page 2)
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Fieldmaster Street between Hall Road and Archibald Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Goodman Way between Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue January 1, 2016 – December 31, 2017
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Citrus Street/South City Limit and Schleisman Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP (Continued on Next Page)
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue (Page 2)
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP (Continued on Next Page)
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue (Page 2)
(Continued on Next Page)
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue (Page 3)
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Harrison Avenue between Chandler Street and Schleisman Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Harrison Avenue between Schleisman Road and Blossom Way July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Hellman Avenue between River Road and Chandler Street
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Hellman Avenue between Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Hellman Avenue between Limonite Ave and North City Limit July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Limonite Avenue between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue January 1, 2016 – December 31, 2017
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Limonite Avenue between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue (Page 2)
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Limonite Avenue between Sumner Avenue and East City Limit January 1, 2016 – December 31, 2017
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Limonite Avenue between Sumner Avenue and East City Limit (Page 2)
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Limonite Avenue between Sumner Avenue and East City Limit (Page 3)
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Limonite Avenue between Sumner Avenue and East City Limit (Page 4)
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Limonite Avenue between Sumner Avenue and East City Limit (Page 5)
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Limonite Avenue between Sumner Avenue and East City Limit (Page 6)
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Limonite Avenue between Sumner Avenue and East City Limit (Page 7)
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Mission Boulevard between S Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Orange Street between Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Prairie Smoke Road between Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
River Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Riverboat Drive between Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Riverside Drive between Hamner Avenue and East City Limit January 1, 2016 – December 31, 2017
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP (Continued on Next Page)
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue (Page 2)
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Scholar Way between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Scholar Way between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Sumner Avenue between Citrus Street and 65th Street
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Sumner Avenue between 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
17.L
Mid-Block Collisions
Whitewell Road between Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
17.L
APPENDIX G
Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s) Certifications
(Updated June 2021)
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
EPD SOLUTIONS
TECHNICAL AND COST PROPOSAL FOR CITYWIDE
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
FOR THE CITY OF HEMET
Submitted by:
Environment Planning Development Solutions, Inc.
EPD Solutions, Inc.
2355 Main Street, Suite 100
Irvine, Calif. 92614
Contact:
Jeremy Krout
[email protected] / (949) 794-1181
Meghan Macias
[email protected] / (949) 533-9182
November 22, 2022
17.L
Urban Planning ■ Due Diligence ■ Entitlements ■ CEQA/NEPA ■ Development Services ■ Management ■ Public Outreach 2355 Main Street, Suite 100 ■ Irvine, Calif. 92614
949.794.1180 ■ [email protected]
November 22, 2022
Noah Rau, PE
Public Works Director/City Engineer
City of Hemet, Engineering Department
445 E. Florida Avenue
Hemet, CA 95243
Re: Technical and Cost Proposal for Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Hemet Dear Mr. Rau,
All of us at EPD Solutions are thrilled to have this opportunity to submit this proposal to assist the City of Hemet with Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey. EPD Solutions, Inc. (EPD) is a full-service environmental consulting firm dedicated to providing environmental and planning services of distinction, quality, and legal merit that optimize value, are environmentally responsible, and enhance local communities. Our in-house technical services team provides traffic engineering, transportation planning, traffic modeling, solar glare analysis, as well as air quality and greenhouse gas analysis services. Meghan Macias, TE, will be managing this project with the support Abby Pal, Alex Garber and Hashem Basrawi.
The EPD team is proud to partner with Rawad Hani, PE, TE, PTP, PTOE from General Technologies and Solutions (GTS) on this project, and Edward and Olga Polunin from Aim Traffic Data LLC. • Rawad is a traffic engineer and transportation planner with over 20 years of experience where he has managed engineering design projects in the US and internationally. Mr. Hani has assisted several local governments across Southern California with projects ranging from signal designs to street lighting, engineering and traffic surveys, traffic studies, parking management strategies and others. He will serve as the quality assurance/control authority on each segment of this project to ensure that correct and court tested studies are complete. This is our effort to ensure that each study is performed in detail and not developed from a “cookie cutter” format which leads to the opportunity to be challenged in court.
• AimTD is a well-established traffic data collection firm with 10 years of experience and has an outstanding reputation with many municipalities and engineering companies in Southern and Northern California. AimTD will assist the EPD with obtaining accurate speed survey and ADT data.
EPD is uniquely qualified to enter into a partnership with the City as our project team provides decades of experience in transportation planning, traffic engineering, traffic modeling and air quality analysis. Our team possesses all of the necessary qualifications and experience required to successfully complete the E&TS. We fully understand the importance of establishing and justifying speed limits which must follow the state criteria to be accepted by Traffic Courts. We will approach every segment of this task order with an emphasis on quality, enthusiasm, and urgency.
EPD has reviewed the questions and answers to the RFP posted on the City’s website. EPD does not have any conflict of interest that would hinder our participation in this project. Please note that the proposal terms shall remain in effect for ninety (90) days following the receipt of this proposal by the City of Hemet. We also confirm that the terms and conditions of the standard professional agreement as included in Attachment A – City Agreement Template is acceptable to EPD.
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey ii We hope you find our proposal compelling, and we look forward to working with the City of Hemet and discussing this exciting opportunity with you further. Please contact me at 949-794-1186 or [email protected] with any questions on this proposal or our expertise.
Respectfully submitted,
EPD Solutions, Inc.
Meghan Macias, TE
Transportation Planning Director
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 1 A. Corporate Profile
Introduction
EPD Solutions, Inc. is a land planning, environmental, development, and civil engineering services firm based in Irvine, California. EPD’s principal employees have an extensive record of successfully assisting clients in resolving difficult environmental, planning, engineering, and regulatory challenges, resulting in balanced decisions, better public policies and successful projects. Client satisfaction is the cornerstone of our business. We work as partners with government agencies, as well as private firms, to understand their needs and ensure that our services make a positive contribution. The experience and skill we bring to each assignment guarantees a flexible and efficient work effort.
Since opening in 2013, EPD has developed a unique breadth of experience, expanding our services from planning and development services to include technical transportation analysis, traffic modeling and traffic engineering. The EPD team manages hundreds of projects a year and our senior project managers have between 10 and 25 years of experience. Our firm is uniquely positioned to leverage our resources, as well as our extensive environmental, planning, engineering, and regulatory experience, to the benefit of the City of Hemet and assist them with the City Engineering and Traffic Survey. With a mighty team of 37, EPD Solutions operates and renders services from its office located at 2355 Main Street, Suite #100, located in the City of Irvine.
The EPD Team is led by the following staff members:
■ Jeremy Krout, AICP, LEED GA, President. Mr. Krout has experience in both the public and private sectors, which has allowed him opportunities to prepare and manage various local, regional, and federal documents and entitlement procedures, in addition to various types of environmental documents. Mr. Krout’s experience spans a diverse range uniquely complex land use planning and entitlement projects, due diligence studies, general plan amendments, zone changes, environmental impact reports, development agreements and construction projects. ■ Konnie Dobreva, JD, Vice President of Environmental Planning. Ms. Dobreva has nearly 20 years of public- and private-sector planning and legal experience, including the preparation of environmental documents for a wide range of projects, including small-scale residential, large master planned communities, commercial office, industrial, solar, and mixed-use. Her extensive experience has made her a keen strategist and an effective writer of legally defensible environmental documents.
■ Meghan Macias, TE, Transportation Planning Director. Ms. Macias has 20 years of experience in the transportation planning field and has worked on hundreds of projects throughout California. worked on numerous and varied projects through California including land development, infrastructure, active transportation and Master/Specific/General Plans. Meghan has a proven track record of managing complicated and controversial projects to achieve defensible and implementable solutions to technical issues. Her expertise in traffic engineering and operations analysis methodologies is complemented by her knowledge of CEQA. Meghan serves on the SB743 Subcommittee of the Institute of Transportation Engineers. ■ Andrea Arcilla, Vice President of Development. Ms. Arcilla has over 18 years of experience in the development and construction of residential and nonresidential land uses, with particular specialization in due diligence, major entitlements and post entitlement processes. During this time, she has successfully entitled and developed over 10 million square feet of industrial business parks including all major infrastructure upgrades and managing highly complex tenant improvements for specialized clients.
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 2 In the field of transportation planning, EPD has extensive experience preparing Vehicle Miles Traveled and Traffic Impact Analyses throughout southern California. We have worked with dozens of local agencies and are familiar with various approaches successfully to project approval. We are currently working on projects transportation planning projects in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties.
Although the EPD team has not completed Engineering and Traffic Surveys inhouse as a firm yet, EPD staff members Abby Pal and Hashem Basrawi have successfully completed Engineering and Traffic surveys for the City of Gilroy, Folsom, South Gate and Santa Fe Springs in their former companies. Our subconsultant team, GTS, have also completed Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City of Colton and have supported the City of Rancho Palos Verdes with speed surveys and investigations on various segments for validating or updating the posted speed limits.
B. Statement of Qualifications
EPD’s Transportation Services
EPD’s traffic analysis services include transportation planning, traffic engineering and parking studies. We recognize that evaluating transportation conditions and mitigating traffic and safety issues improves quality of life and enhances local and regional mobility. By providing transportation planning services inhouse, we can integrate the technical traffic analysis with the planning and CEQA compliance stages of a project allowing EPD to identify and solve traffic issues early in the process. EPD staff has extensive experience using traffic impact analysis software such as Vistro, Synchro and HCS and is knowledgeable in the application of technical traffic analysis methodologies to all project types. We regularly use TransCAD to assist projects with VMT analysis and VMT mitigations in several jurisdictions. We provide the following transportation planning services during all phases of a project, from due diligence through CEQA analysis:
• Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
• Level of Service Studies
• Travel Demand Modeling
• Due Diligence Assessments
• Parking Studies
• Site Planning (Access/Circulation Studies)
• Signing and Striping Plans
• Traffic Operations Analyses
• Roadway Safety
GTS Transportation Services
GTS was established with the goal of helping public agencies leverage advanced technology in transportation and believes in the power of technology to effect meaningful change in local neighborhoods and communities. Smart cities are the future, offering unlimited opportunities for smart government technology. GTS brings together the understanding of smart technology solutions (what’s on the horizon) with community needs and goals (what’s in demand).
GTS provides mobility solutions for all road uses: pedestrian, bicycle, transit, auto, and freight modes. GTS employs state-of-the-art technologies to provide innovation in:
• Traffic Engineering
• Multi-Modal Planning
• Parking
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 3 • Systems Engineering
GTS currently works across Southern California from Ventura County to Los Angeles County, Orange County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, and Imperial County. GTS supports projects with various clients including Los Angeles Metro, Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), Riverside County, Caltrans, and the cities of Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Moreno Valley, Colton, Coachella, Cathedral City, San Bernardino among others. GTS services include:
• transportation planning
• parking studies
• traffic engineering tasks ranging from speed studies to traffic signal design and modification, data analytics, revitalization plans, safety studies and traffic control.
AimTD Services
Aim Traffic Data – AimTD – has over ten years of experience providing accurate traffic data collection with focus on customer service. AimTD is a California Limited Liability Corporation with the main office located in Anaheim, CA. AimTD conducts over 10,000 Traffic Counts annually throughout California and has contracts for collection of Traffic Counts with the following municipalities: LADOT, OCTA, City of Santa Barbara, City of Yorba Linda, City of Costa Mesa, City of Pasadena, County of Orange Public Works Department, City of Chino Hills, City of Chino, City of Tustin, City of San Luis Obispo, City of Mission Viejo, City of Santa Ana, City of Beverly Hills and City of Santa Monica. Services offered by AimTD are as follows:
• Intersection Turning Movement Counts
• Right Turn on Red Studies
• 24Hr Machine Counts ADTs
• 24Hr Axle Vehicle Classification Studies
• 24Hr to 7- day Video ADTs
• Bicycle, Pedestrian Counts and Motorized Scooters
• Parking Occupancy Studies, Parking Turnover Studies
• Radar Spot Speed Surveys
• Travel Time Surveys, Queue Studies, Traffic Gap Studies, and Saturation Flow Analysis • Transit Surveys, Pedestrian Interview Surveys
C. Relevant Experience
EPD Project Experience
Our EPD team is working on and/or has completed the entire Traffic Impact Analysis and VMT Studies for several projects, few of which are listed below:
• The Bowery, City of Santa Ana
• Gemini Solar, Clark County, Nevada
• Bloomington Business Park Specific Plan, County of San Bernardino • Citrus Crossroads, City of Fontana
• Wildomar Crossroads, City of Wildomar
• Rio Vista Specific Plan, Jurupa Valley
• Pioneer Boulevard Business Park, Santa Fe Springs
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 4 • Slover Alder Industrial Project, County of San Bernardino • Vineyard Specific Plan, City of Murrieta
• Kirby Street Industrial, City of Hemet
The EPD Solutions Team has also worked with the City of Redlands and developed greenhouse gas (GHG)- based VMT screening thresholds for the City. The City of Redlands VMT Guidelines, including the GHG screening thresholds were adopted by the City in July, 2020.
GTS Project Experience
• City of Colton Engineering and Traffic Survey
• City of Rancho Palos Verdes On-Call
• City of San Bernardino Traffic Signal Upgrade PS&E Services • City of Glendora Local Road Safety Plan
• Traffic Calming Analysis, La Habra Heights
AimTD Project Experience
• City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation On-Call Traffic Data Collection • 2022 Southern California Association of Governments Screenlines Counts (Subconsultant) • 2021 City of Chino ADT Counts
• 2021 City of Chino Radar Speed Surveys
• 2021 Traffic Data Collection for Metro Purple Line Section 2 team and Tutor Perini/O&G Industries, A Joint Venture (TPOGJV) (Subconsultant)
D. Project Team
EPD Team
Over the past 7 years, EPD has proudly engaged with agencies throughout Southern California. EPD has developed streamlined methods of communication with outside agencies and subconsultants. The direct point of contact for this project will be our Project Manager, Meghan Macias. In addition to supervising our in-house team, the project manager also oversees subconsultants working with EPD. EPD’s experience has shown that focusing communication through the project manager maximizes flow of relevant information and ensures that the city receives timely and responsive communications.
The following key staff will comprise EPD’s team. Qualifications and experience summaries for these staff members are provided below.
• Meghan Macias, TE, Transportation Planning Director
• Abby Pal, Associate Transportation Planner
• Alex Garber, Associate Transportation Planner
• Hashem Basrawi, Assistant Transportation Planner
EPD’s team also includes General Technologies and Solutions (GTS) and Aim TD. EPD has partnered with GTS on several projects for construction drawings for signal phasing, and signing and striping plans. Led by Rawad Hani, PE, TE, PTP, PTOE, GTS will partner with EPD to peer-review all documents and provide stringent QA/QC over the speed survey results obtained for each segment. EPD has partnered with AimTD on every transportation project which involved data collection and will rely on the accurate data provided
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 5 by AimTD to complete the Engineering and Traffic Study. The data collection will be led by Ed and Olga Polunin.
Note: The resumes of all key project team staff is provided in Attachment B.
E. References
EPD References
City of Redlands VMT Guidelines
The EPD team developed greenhouse gas (GHG)-based VMT screening thresholds for the City of Redlands. The thresholds provided a technical and legal basis for identifying the project size for various land use types that would have a less than significant impact on VMT and would not require further analysis. To identify the project sizes that would screen out of further analysis, average trip lengths for the City were extracted from the SBTAM model. These trip lengths along with the trip generation for each use were evaluated using the CalEEMod software to identify the greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) for the project. If the GHG emissions were considered insignificant per SCAQMD practices, then VMT was also considered insignificant. This approach was reviewed by legal counsel for the City and SBCTA and was deemed defensible with adequate substantial evidence to support a finding of less than significant VMT impacts. The City of Redlands VMT Guidelines, including the GHG screening thresholds were adopted by the City in July, 2020. The duration of this project was about 6 months.
Contact:
Brian Foote, AICP
Planning Manager
City of Redlands
35 Cajon Street, Suite 20
Redlands, CA 92373
(909) 798-7562
[email protected]
The Bowery Traffic Impact Analysis
The EPD team provide a thorough traffic impact analysis for 50 intersections for The Bowery. This project entailed transforming an obsolete office complex on a 15.6 acre site in the center of Orange County into a mixed use development which included 1,150 multifamily residential units and 80,000 square feet of commercial retail and restaurant spaces. This project has broken ground and currently under construction.
The duration of the project was 1.5 years beginning 2019.
Contact:
Ali Pezeshkpour
Senior Planner
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701
(714) 647-5882
[email protected]
5770 North Industrial Project Traffic Impact and VMT Screening Analysis EPD completed a traffic impact study and VMT screening analysis for a 52,000 SF truck terminal on a
11.07 acre site which included 34,000 SF of pallet manufacturing on site as an existing use. The duration
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 6 of this project was 1.5 years beginning 2021. The project is approved and is planned to start construction in January 2023.
Contact:
Azzam Jabsheh,PE. TE. PTOE
Traffic Engineer
Public Works Department
City of San Bernardino
201 N E Street, Suite 200
San Bernardino, CA 92401
(909) 384-7251
[email protected]
Redlands and Placentia Industrial Traffic Impact and VMT Screening Analysis EPD completed a traffic impact study and VMT screening analysis for a 121,100 SF industrial project on a
5.74 acre site. The project was unique such that the study intersections analyzed as a part of the project were in construction, namely the 1-215 and Placentia interchange. EPD had to incorporate Traffic modelling using TransCAD to develop turning movement volumes for the project opening scenarios for intersections under construction. Given the challenging site constraints of above surface utilities, EPD also successfully developed access, and striping for the project truck traffic access. The TIA for this project was recently approved such in November. The duration of this study was about 6 months.
Contact:
Robert Kahn (City of Perris On-call Traffic Consultant) RK Engineering
1401 Dove Street, Suite 540
Newport Beach, CA 92660
[email protected]
Note: EPD staff availability and additional references are provided in Attachment C.
GTS References
City of Colton Engineering and Traffic Survey
GTS supported the City of Colton by recommending the establishment and renewal of valid posted speed limits for forty-four (44) street segments on twenty-seven (27) citywide streets within the City. GTS conducted a comprehensive Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) to determine these results. This E&TS is prepared for the City as a record of existing conditions on the selected roadways provides the City with a basis for updating and validating its currently posted speed limits on citywide streets. The GTS study included an analysis of prevailing speeds, as determined by traffic engineering measurements; an analysis of collision records for the most recent available two-year period; and other highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
Client: City of Colton
Contact Person: Victor Ortiz | Assistant PW Director/City Engineer | [email protected] | 909.514.4210
Duration of Project: 2021 – 2022
Current Status: Completed
City of Rancho Palos Verdes On-Call
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 7 As part of the on-call, GTS has supported the City on speed survey updates and investigations of various segments. GTS assessed existing conditions on the selected roadways and provided the City with a basis for updating or validating the currently posted speed limits. The GTS studies include safety analysis as well as analysis of prevailing speeds, as determined by traffic engineering measurements; GTS also supported on reinforcement of speed limits by investigating locations where signs to be placed per CA MUTCD as well as locations that could benefit from radar speed feedback signs.
Client: City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Contact Person: Ramzi Awwad | Public Works Director | [email protected] | 310.544.5275 Duration of Project: 2021 – Ongoing
Current Status: Ongoing
City of San Bernardino Traffic Signal Upgrade PS&E Services GTS provided traffic engineering signal upgrade services for 40 of the 224 signalized intersections in the City of San Bernardino where various safety, operational, and accessibility upgrades are required. This HSIP-funded project will replace or install new equipment to the existing traffic signal system which include traffic signal head improvements, pedestrian signal head improvements, and pedestrian pushbutton improvements among others.
Client: City of San Bernardino
Contact Person: Azzam Jabsheh | City Traffic Engineer | [email protected] | 909.384.7272 Duration of Project: 2020 – 2021
Current Status: Completed
City of Glendora Local Road Safety Plan
GTS assisted the City of Glendora in developing the City’s Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP). The project included coordinating with City staff to develop a vision, goals, and objectives for the LRSP which are aligned with the City’s vision, documenting the existing safety efforts followed by analyzing the safety data, and conducting a field review. GTS developed both engineering and non-engineering countermeasures to address the identified collision patterns and safety emphasis areas based on collision data analysis and stakeholder input. The results of these tasks will be incorporated into an Administrative Draft Local Road Safety Plan for review by the City followed by a finalized Local Roadway Safety Plan Report.
Client: City of Glendora
Contact Person: Maliha Ansari | Principal Engineer | [email protected] | 626.914.8294 Duration of Project: 2021 – 2022
Current Status: Completed
Traffic Calming Analysis, La Habra Heights
GTS was retained by the City of La Habra Heights to study traffic calming along the City’s roads. GTS reviewed the previous studies carried out in 2002, 2006, 2007, and 2014 as well as other relevant plans.
The most recent 5-year SWITRS data was also obtained and analyzed. Following the data collection, a community meeting will be carried out to share the findings and engage the community in exploring potential solutions. GTS will embark on their analysis and present recommendations at a second community at-large workshop. The results of the analysis and refined recommendations will then be presented in a final report and presentation to the City Council.
Client: City of Colton
Contact Person: Fabiola Huerta | City Manager | [email protected] | 562.694.6302 Duration of Project: 2020
Current Status: Completed
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 8 F. Scope of Work
Project Understanding
Based on the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 40802, state and local agencies should conduct engineering and traffic studies once every five to seven years to reassess speed limits on major and arterial roadway segments that may have gone under significant changes. EPD Solutions proposes to conduct Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) to reassess and establish speed limits for roadway segments within the City of Hemet in response to this RFP. The speed survey studies will include collecting speed data and development of recommendations for 144 roadway segments as provided by the City to solicit scope of work for this RFP.
The criteria to conduct the E&TS study is defined in the California Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) and is very explicit in the collection and application of the traffic data. This study allows the agency to set speed limits on streets and includes reduction factors where criteria is justified. Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) is very specialized in the data gathering and analysis phase. It is important to understand the State Mandate (including the California Vehicle Code) to perform the study and how it relates to the DMV enforcement codes. The development of the study must follow State criteria to be accepted by the Traffic Courts. In the preparation of the E&TS, consideration must also be given to traffic patterns, the community, and enforcement of the speed limits. EPD Solutions in partnership with GTS and AimTD will produce studies accepted by the traffic courts as truthful and representative documents.
The following sections illustrate our proposed scope of work as per the task order solicitation request.
Scope of Work Tasks
Task 1: Project Management/Meetings
A. Preparation for and Attendance at Kick-Off Meeting
• Upon receiving Notice to Proceed, EPD will begin to review all relevant data such as City of Hemet General Plan, existing land use, relevant California Vehicle Codes, road and traffic conditions, speed zone, and collision history for all proposed segments. Information such as the most up-to-date road and traffic conditions will be requested from the City. • EPD will schedule and organize a kick-off with the City within one to two weeks of receiving Notice to Proceed. We will work with the City to identify required attendees at the kick-off meeting and will provide the City with an agenda prior to the meeting for review. Essential items that will be discussed at the kick-off meeting include the review and discussion of scope of work provided for the Engineering and Traffic Survey, project goals, deliverables, schedule, and project management and reporting protocols.
• As a follow-up task to the kick-off meeting, EPD will discuss any complaints and concerns brought to the attention of City Staff regarding speeding and resulting crashes received from the residents in the City of Hemet, and any other issues (such as ongoing construction at study segments) that need to be addressed as a part of the Engineering and Traffic Survey. Recommendation for adding any segments which might be experiencing crashes as a result of speeding will be made to the City based on review of data and information received from the City.
B. Project Management and Meetings
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 9 • Prominent, assertive, clear and responsive project management is the key to a project’s success.
The EPD Team’s project manager will play the key role in assuring these characteristics are implanted throughout the project. To that end, the EPD Team’s project manager will be responsible for managing (1) task scheduling and assignment, management of resources, monitoring of costs, and schedule adherence; (2) consultation and coordination with the City and other local and state agencies relative to fulfilling the scope of work; (3) coordination and communications with the City to provide regular project updates, respond to questions and assure that City policies, procedures, and any applicable codes are addressed with and, where applicable, are incorporated into the final document; and (4) scheduling regular meetings, preparing agendas, project task management lists, up-to-date project data needs matrices and meeting action minutes. • The EPD Team will lead four (4) formal virtual meetings with City staff to discuss project status, any issues, and receive City feedback. One hour will be scheduled for each meeting.. Prior to the meetings, the EPD Team’s project manager will provide a meeting agenda, project task management list and an up-to-date project data needs matrix. Subsequent to the meetings, meeting action minutes will be provided.
• In addition to the formal team meetings, our Team will be available to meet with City staff on an informal basis as often as necessary in order to request and receive information and receive clarification and direction from the City Engineering and Streets department. This ongoing coordination will take place via conference call or using a virtual meeting platform such as Teams or Zoom.
Task 1 Deliverables: Project Data Needs Matrix, Meeting Agendas, Meeting Notes/Minutes Task 2: Field Review and Data Collection
A. Existing Conditions Field Investigation
• EPD will prepare a data matrix for existing conditions on each speed study segment and submit the segment data matrices to the City for review. For each segment, the following would be reviewed based on the City of Hemet General Plan, SWITRS and web-based aerial survey:
i) Roadway type and General Plan Classification
ii) Number of Lanes
iii) Type of median
iv) Width of roadway and length of study segment
v) Existing horizontal and vertical curves
vi) Frequency of driveways and intersections
vii) Type of adjacent land use
viii) Existence of pedestrian generators
ix) Type of crosswalks and mid-block crossings
x) Presence of bike lanes
xi) Location of signage
xii) Total crashes per segment (using SWITRS), Statewide Average Accident Rate • After preparing the data matrix, the EPD team will drive all street segments to determine based on engineering judgement, whether or not there are any roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the motorist. Such characteristics could justify the lowering of the existing speed limit based on State established guidelines. The following factors will be surveyed while in field:
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 10 i) Traffic flow characteristics
ii) Street width and alignment
iii) Channelization and striping patterns
iv) Reversed super-elevations
v) Frequency of driveways and intersections
vi) Visibility obstructions caused by vertical or horizontal curves vii) Adjacent land uses including major traffic generators viii) Block walls
ix) Multiple driveways
x) Grade
xi) Heavy truck traffic
xii) Heavy pedestrian and bicycle travel (including type of bike facility and improvised pedestrian/bike routes)
xiii) Existing speed sign locations
xiv) Heavy on-street parking maneuvers, and
xv) Any other roadside conditions that would affect safety and are not apparent to the motorist.
B. Average Daily Traffic Counts and Accident Rate
• The EPD project team will collect bi-directional 24-hour counts in 15-minute increments during weekdays for all the 144 study segments.
• The Accident rate (number of accidents/million vehicle miles) will be calculated based on SWITRS data and collected ADT counts.
C. Speed Surveys
• Spot speed surveys will be conducted at each segment to establish a reasonable and effective speed limit. Radar site location selection is critical to the accurate collection of unimpeded speeds whereby the site should be situated beyond the influence of stops, curves, parked cars, traffic lights and other conditions that might impact the traffic flow. EPD will coordinate with the City Staff to determine the location of speed data collection. • As per the requirement of the City of Hemet, speed surveys will be conducted as per the CA MUTCD standards using a hand-held radar or approved equal. Surveys will be taken during offpeak hours and good weather conditions. Bidirectional speed surveys will be conducted at each location to measure the actual speed on unimpeded traffic. • All survey data collected will adhere to the following per specific street segment as per the requirement of the City of Hemet:
i) A minimum of 50 observations at each location will be provided at each location with a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles.
ii) A survey of 100 observations for each direction of travel will be provided if there is a raised median in the study segment.
iii) If there is no raised median, a survey of 50 observations for each direction of travel will be provided.
iv) For two-way streets, 50 observations for each direction at each location will be provided.
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 11 • Spot speed surveys will be illustrating the individual spot speeds along with the following:
i) Posted speed limits
ii) Direction of survey
iii) Data and time of the survey
iv) 50th percentile speed
v) 85th percentile speed
vi) 10 mph pace speed
vii) Percent over pace speed
viii) Range of speeds
ix) Number of vehicles observed
Task 2 Deliverables: Existing Conditions Data Matrices for Each Segment, Crash Data and Accident Rate, Average Daily Traffic Counts, Spot Speed Surveys.
Task 3: Draft and Final Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) A. Preliminary Recommendations on Speed Limits
• EPD will prepare a preliminary report summarizing the results of Task 2 in the form a technical memorandum with Speed Survey Result matrices attached for each segment. The format of EPD’s Speed Survey Result matrix is attached for the City’s review. The matrix will include the following sections:
i) Segment Information
ii) Roadway Conditions
iii) Prevailing Speed Data
iv) Collision History
v) Traffic Factors
vi) Recommended Speed Limit
All the Speed Survey Results will be strictly reviewed for QA/QC.
B. Final Field Check for Recommended Speed Limits
• EPD will conduct a final field review to determine if the recommended speed limits are most appropriate and reasonable. Remarks from the final field review will be included in the final Speed Survey Result matrices. Any change to the draft recommended speed limits will be noted and a justification will be provided for the change in recommendation. A strict QA/QC of the Speed Survey Results will be conducted post incorporation of remarks and recommendations changes from the final field review.
C. Draft Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
• EPD will prepare a draft E&TS in conformance with the latest CVC and CA MUTCD for each of the identified speed survey segments. The draft E&TS will be submitted to the City for review.
The format of the report will include:
i) Introduction
Relevant California Vehicle Codes
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 12 ii) Data Collection and Analysis
Existing Conditions and Speed Limits
Collision Analysis
Speed Surveys and Analysis
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Counts
Field Observations
iii) Recommended Speed Limits
D. Final Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
• EPD will finalize the above draft E&TS following one round of review and comments by the City and a version ready for stamping and signature will be prepared and submitted to the City.
Task 3 Deliverables: Technical Memorandum for Preliminary Speed Survey Results, Draft E&TS, Final E&TS.
Task 4: Value Added Service
A. ArcGIS Map
• EPD will prepare a map using ArcGIS showing speed limits within city limits along each roadway segment. Each segment will be coded with attributes such as posted speed limits, roadway characteristics, ADT, collision data, and recommended speed limits. EPD understands the importance of data integration and believes the provision of data to the City in GIS format will speed the process of E&TS implementation and street management for the Public Works department.
G. Quality Control
Quality control is an important part of EPD project management process. As mentioned in the scope of work, EPD’s project manager will play the key role in assuring prominent, assertive, clear and responsive project management is implanted throughout the project. To that end, the EPD Team’s project manager, Meghan Macias, will be responsible for managing (1) task scheduling and assignment, management of resources, monitoring of costs, and schedule adherence; (2) consultation and coordination with the City and other local and state agencies relative to fulfilling the scope of work; (3) coordination and communications with the City to provide regular project updates, respond to questions and assure that City policies, procedures, and any applicable codes are addressed with and, where applicable, are incorporated into the final document; and (4) scheduling regular meetings, preparing agendas, project task management lists, up-to-date project data needs matrices and meeting action minutes.
Effective project management, coordination and communication with the City along with EPD’s experienced transportation planning and engineering staff will ensure that any deliverable meets the standards of the City of Hemet. All deliverables for the E&TS will also be reviewed by Rawad Hani, PE, TE, PTP, PTOE to ensure stringent QA/QC is performed prior to submitting all deliverables to the City.
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 13 H. Schedule
EPD proposes the following schedule for the E&TS:
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 14 I. Budget
EPD proposes the following fixed and not-to-exceed fee for this Project. Tasks that will be charged hourly are not to exceed budget estimates with the hourly rates identified in the attached provisions of agreement.
Billing Rates:
Project Manager: $275 per hour
Traffic Engineer: $200 per hour
Traffic Engineer: $200 per hour
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 15 Attachment A
17.L
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
By and Between
THE CITY OF HEMET,
a California municipal corporation
and
______________________________
17.L
- 1 -
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA AND __________
This Professional Services Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of this ____ day of __________, 2022 by and between the City of Hemet, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and ____________(“Contractor”). City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
A. City has sought by a request for proposal the performance of the Type of Service defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement.
B. Contractor was selected by the City to perform those services.
C. Contractor was selected by the City on the basis of Contractor’s demonstrated competence and the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required.
D. Pursuant to the City of Hemet’s Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into this Professional Services Agreement and the City Manager has authority to execute this Agreement.
E. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Contractor for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT.
(a) Subject to the provisions of Section 20 "Termination of Agreement" of this Agreement, the Term of this Agreement is for [duration] commencing on the date first ascribed above, unless otherwise extended in writing by the grant administrator. (b) The City may, in its sole discretion, unilaterally exercise an option to extend the Agreement on a month-to-month basis following expiration on the same terms and conditions, including compensation as set forth in Section 4. (c) Contractor acknowledges that the Agreement term may extend over multiple City fiscal years, and that work and compensation under this Agreement is contingent on the City Council appropriating funding for and authorizing such work and
17.L
- 2 -
compensation for those fiscal years. This Agreement may be terminated by the City at the end of a fiscal year when sufficient funding is not appropriated and authorized for the subsequent fiscal year. City is not obligated to pay Contractor for any amounts not duly appropriated and authorized by City Council.
SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES & SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE. (a) Scope of Services. Contractor agrees to perform the services set forth in Exhibit “A” “Scope of Services” (hereinafter, the “Services”) and made a part of this Agreement by this reference.
(b) Schedule of Performance. The Services shall be completed pursuant to the schedule specified in Exhibit “A.” Should the Services not be completed pursuant to that schedule, the Contractor shall be deemed to be in Default of this Agreement. The City, in its sole discretion, may choose not to enforce the Default provisions of this Agreement and may instead allow Contractor to continue performing the Services.
SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES.
Contractor shall not be compensated for any work rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement that are in addition to or outside of the Services unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing in accordance with Section 26 “Administration and Implementation” or Section 28 “Amendment” of this Agreement. If and when such additional work is authorized, such additional work shall be deemed to be part of the Services.
SECTION 4. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
(a) Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Contractor the amounts specified in Exhibit “B” “Compensation” and made a part of this Agreement by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed ______________________________ dollars ($_____________), unless additional compensation is approved in writing in accordance with Section 26 “Administration and Implementation” or Section 28 “Amendment” of this Agreement.
(b) Each month Contractor shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. The invoice shall detail charges by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and subconsultant contracts. Subconsultant charges shall be detailed by the following categories: labor, travel, materials, equipment and supplies. If the compensation set forth in subsection (a) and Exhibit “B” include payment of labor on an hourly basis (as opposed to labor and materials being paid as a lump sum), the labor category in each invoice shall include detailed descriptions of tasks performed and the amount of time incurred for or allocated to that task. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Contractor to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event
17.L
- 3 -
that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice shall be approved and paid according to the terms set forth in subsection (c). In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Contractor for correction and resubmission.
(c) Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Contractor which are disputed by City, City will use its best efforts to cause Contractor to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Contractor’s correct and undisputed invoice.
(d) Payment to Contractor for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Contractor. (e) If this Agreement is extended pursuant to Section 1, the City shall pay the same rates specified in Exhibit “B” “Compensation.”
SECTION 5. INSPECTION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
City may inspect and accept or reject any of Contractor’s work under this Agreement, either during performance or when completed. City shall reject or finally accept Contractor’s work within sixty (60) days after submitted to City. City shall reject work by a timely written explanation, otherwise Contractor’s work shall be deemed to have been accepted. City’s acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and such gross mistakes as amount to fraud.
Acceptance of any of Contractor’s work by City shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement including, but not limited to, Section 16 “Indemnification” and Section 17 “Insurance.”
SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
All original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Contractor. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall turn over to City all such original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents.
If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement, Contractor’s guarantees and warranties in Section 9 “Standard of Performance” of this Agreement shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents.
17.L
- 4 -
SECTION 7. CONTRACTOR'S BOOKS AND RECORDS.
(a) Contractor shall maintain any and all documents and records demonstrating or relating to Contractor’s performance of the Services. Contractor shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, or other documents or records evidencing or relating to work, services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement.
Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained for three (3) years from the date of execution of this Agreement and to the extent required by laws relating to audits of public agencies and their expenditures.
(b) Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon request by City or its designated representative. Copies of such documents or records shall be provided directly to the City for inspection, audit and copying when it is practical to do so; otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, such documents and records shall be made available at Contractor’s address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. (c) Where City has reason to believe that any of the documents or records required to be maintained pursuant to this section may be lost or discarded due to dissolution or termination of Contractor’s business, City may, by written request, require that custody of such documents or records be given to the City. Access to such documents and records shall be granted to City, as well as to its successors-in-interest and authorized representatives.
SECTION 8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
(a) Contractor is and shall at all times remain a wholly independent contractor and not an officer, employee or agent of City. Contractor shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, nor to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. (b) The personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control.
Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor’s officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of Contractor’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City.
17.L
- 5 -
(c) Neither Contractor, nor any of Contractor’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Contractor expressly waives any claim Contractor may have to any such rights.
SECTION 9. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE.
Contractor represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all Services. In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to the Services required of Contractor under this Agreement, and shall use such skill, prudence, and diligence as other members of Contractor’s profession commonly possess and exercise. In addition to the general standards of performance set forth this section, additional specific standards of performance and performance criteria may be set forth in Exhibit “A” “Scope of Work” that shall also be applicable to Contractors work under this Agreement. Where there is a conflict between a general and a specific standard of performance or performance criteria, the specific standard or criteria shall prevail over the general.
SECTION 10. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS; PERMITS AND LICENSES.
Contractor shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect during the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall obtain any and all licenses, permits and authorizations necessary to perform the Services set forth in this Agreement. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of Contractor to comply with this section.
SECTION 11. PREVAILING WAGE LAWS.
It is the understanding of City and Contractor that California prevailing wage laws do not apply to this Agreement because the Agreement does not involve any of the following services subject to prevailing wage rates pursuant to the California Labor Code or regulations promulgated thereunder: Construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work performed on public buildings, facilities, streets or sewers done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds. In this context, “construction" includes work performed during the design and preconstruction phases of construction including, but not limited to, inspection and land surveying work.
17.L
- 6 -
SECTION 12. NONDISCRIMINATION.
Contractor shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of race, color, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, physical handicap, medical condition or marital status in connection with or related to the performance of this Agreement.
SECTION 13. UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS.
Contractor hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein.
Should Contractor so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of the Services, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Contractor hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City.
SECTION 14. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
(a) Contractor covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Contractor’s performance of the Services. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Contractor agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.
(b) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor is, as of the date of execution of this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non-related services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Contractor is unaware of any stated position of City relative to such projects. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. (c) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor will, perform nonrelated services for other governmental agencies and private parties following the completion of the Services under this Agreement. Any such future service shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section.
SECTION 15. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; RELEASE OF INFORMATION. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Contractor. Contractor shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other
17.L
- 7 -
than City without prior written authorization from the City Manager, except as may be required by law.
(b) Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney of City, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
(c) If Contractor, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Contractor, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Contractor for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Contractor’s conduct.
(d) Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Contractor or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
SECTION 16. INDEMNIFICATION.
(a) Indemnification by Contractor. As provided under Civil Code Section 2782.8, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all claims, actions and proceedings (whether at law or equity, administrative or judicial), demands, orders, judgments, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees and costs, (collectively "Claims") to the extent same arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Contractor, its officers, agents, employees or sub-consultants (or any entity or individual that Contractor shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. In the event Claims are found by the trier of fact to have been caused by the joint or concurrent negligence of the City, its contractors and other Contractors, and Contractor, damages and expenses from both indemnity and duty to defend obligations shall be borne by each party in proportion to its negligence.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event one or more defendants are unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, Contractor shall meet and confer with other parties regarding unpaid defense costs. The provisions of this section pertaining to Contractor’s duty to defend shall not apply if there
17.L
- 8 -
is a project-specific general liability policy of insurance that insures all project participants for general liability exposure on a primary basis and also covers all Contractors involved with the project for their legal liability arising out of their professional services on a primary basis.
(b) Indemnification from Sub-consultants. Contractor agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this section from each and every sub-consultant, sub-contractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contractor in the performance of this Agreement naming the Indemnified Parties as additional indemnitees. In the event Contractor fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required here, Contractor agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Contractor and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this section. (c) City's Negligence. The provisions of this section do not apply to Claims occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence. The provisions of this section shall not release City from liability arising from gross negligence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and all of its officials, employees and agents.
SECTION 17. INSURANCE.
Contractor agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit “C” “Insurance” and made a part of this Agreement. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by City as to form and content. These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so approved in writing by the City Manager. Contractor agrees to provide City with copies of required policies upon request.
SECTION 18. ASSIGNMENT.
The expertise and experience of Contractor are material considerations for this Agreement. City has an interest in the qualifications and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Contractor under this Agreement. In recognition of that interest, Contractor shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or any portion of this Agreement or the performance of any of Contractor’s duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City.
Any attempted assignment shall be ineffective, null and void, and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 20 “Termination of Agreement.” City acknowledges, however, that Contractor, in the performance of its duties pursuant to this Agreement, may utilize subcontractors.
17.L
- 9 -
SECTION 19. CONTINUITY OF PERSONNEL.
Contractor shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Contractor’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services. Contractor shall notify City of any changes in Contractor’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services prior to and during any such performance.
SECTION 20. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.
(a) City may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time by giving thirty (30) days written notice of termination to Contractor. In the event such notice is given, Contractor shall cease immediately all work in progress. (b) Contractor may terminate this Agreement for cause at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination to City.
(c) If either Contractor or City fail to perform any material obligation under this Agreement, then, in addition to any other remedies, either Contractor, or City may terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice. (d) Upon termination of this Agreement by either Contractor or City, all property belonging exclusively to City which is in Contractor’s possession shall be returned to City. Contractor shall furnish to City a final invoice for work performed and expenses incurred by Contractor, prepared as set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement.
This final invoice shall be reviewed and paid in the same manner as set forth in Section 4 “Compensation and Method of Payment” of this Agreement. (e) City may suspend all or any portion of Contractor’s performance under this Contract at its sole option and for its convenience for a reasonable period of time not to exceed six (6) months. City must first give ten (10) days’ written notice to Contractor of such suspension. City will pay to Contractor a sum equivalent to the reasonable value of the services satisfactorily provided up to the date of suspension. City may rescind the suspension prior to or at six (6) months by providing Contractor with written notice of the rescission, at which time Contractor would be required to resume performance in compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. Contractor will be entitled to an extension of time to complete performance under the Agreement equal to the length of the suspension unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the Parties.
SECTION 21. DEFAULT.
In the event that Contractor is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Contractor of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Contractor may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period
17.L
- 10 -
of time that Contractor is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Contractor does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under Section 20. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Contractor’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.
SECTION 22. EXCUSABLE DELAYS.
Contractor shall not be liable for damages, including liquidated damages, if any, caused by delay in performance or failure to perform due to causes beyond the control of Contractor. Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, acts of federal, state or local governments, acts of City, court orders, fires, floods, epidemics, strikes, embargoes, and unusually severe weather. The term and price of this Agreement shall be equitably adjusted for any delays due to such causes.
SECTION 23. COOPERATION BY CITY.
All public information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing and available to City as public records, and which are necessary for carrying out the Services shall be furnished to Contractor in every reasonable way to facilitate, without undue delay, the Services to be performed under this Agreement.
SECTION 24. NOTICES.
All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or sent by telecopier or certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, addressed as follows:
To City: City of Hemet
Attn: City Manager
445 E. Florida Avenue
Hemet, CA 92543
To Contractor: _________________________
_________________________
_________________________
_________________________
Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or transmitted by facsimile or, if mailed, three (3) days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service.
17.L
- 11 -
SECTION 25. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE.
The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor represents and warrants that he/she/they has/have the authority to so execute this Agreement and to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
SECTION 26. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION.
This Agreement shall be administered and executed by the City Manager or his or her designated representative. The City Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations and to make amendments to this Agreement, including amendments that commit additional funds, consistent with Section 28 “Amendment” and the City Manager’s contracting authority under the Hemet Municipal Code.
SECTION 27. BINDING EFFECT.
This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.
SECTION 28. AMENDMENT.
No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Contractor and by the City. The City Manager shall have the authority to approve any amendment to this Agreement if the total compensation under this Agreement, as amended, would not exceed the City Manager’s contracting authority under the Hemet Municipal Code. All other amendments shall be approved by the City Council. The Parties agree that the requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.
SECTION 29. WAIVER.
Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant.
Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Contractor shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement.
SECTION 30. LAW TO GOVERN; VENUE.
This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed according to the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation between the Parties, venue in state trial courts shall lie exclusively in the County of Riverside, California. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Riverside.
17.L
- 12 -
SECTION 31. ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES.
In the event litigation or other proceeding is required to enforce or interpret any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such litigation or other proceeding shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees, costs and expenses, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.
SECTION 32. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.
This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits "A" through "C," is the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the Parties with respect to the matters addressed therein and supersedes all other agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, or entered into between Contractor and City prior to the execution of this Agreement. No statements, representations or other agreements, whether oral or written, made by any Party which are not embodied herein shall be valid and binding.
SECTION 33. SEVERABILITY.
If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is declared or determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and the Agreement shall be read and construed without the invalid, void or unenforceable provision(s).
SECTION 34. CONFLICTING TERMS.
Except as otherwise stated herein, if the terms of this Agreement conflict with the terms of any Exhibit hereto, or with the terms of any document incorporated by reference into this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.
17.L
- 13 -
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA AND _______________ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.
CITY OF HEMET
___________________________
Eddie Pust, Police Chief
Interim City Manager
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
___________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
____________________________
SERVICE PROVIDER
By:
Its:
17.L
A-1
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Service Provider will perform to the satisfaction of the City the following Services:
A.
B.
C.
D.
II. As part of the Services, Service Provider will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to the City:
A.
B.
C.
D.
III. During performance of the Services, Service Provider will keep the City appraised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports:
A.
B.
C.
D.
IV. The tangible work products and status reports will be delivered to the City pursuant to the following schedule:
A.
B.
17.L
A-2
C.
D.
V. Service Provider will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the Services:
A.
B.
C.
D.
VI. Service Provider will utilize the following subcontractors to accomplish the Services:
A.
B.
C.
D.
17.L
B-1
EXHIBIT "B"
COMPENSATION
I. Contractor shall use the following rates of pay in the performance of the Services:
A. [job] [hourly rate]
B. [job] [hourly rate]
C. [job] [hourly rate]
D. [job] [hourly rate]
E. [job] [hourly rate]
III. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed _______________________________Dollars ($__________) as provided in Section 4 “Compensation and Method of Payment” of this Agreement.
17.L
C-1
EXHIBIT "C"
INSURANCE
A. Insurance Requirements. Contractor shall provide and maintain insurance, acceptable to the City, in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services by Contractor, its agents, representatives or employees. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII. Contractor shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance:
1. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain the following types and limits of insurance.
2. Minimum Limits of Insurance.
General liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted.
Automobile liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident.
Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement.
Workers’ compensation insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000 per accident or disease).
17.L
C-2
Consultant shall submit to Agency, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of Agency, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.
Umbrella or excess liability insurance. [Optional depending on limits required]. As an option to meet the limits of insurance required by this Agreement, Consultant may obtain and maintain an umbrella or excess liability insurance policy with limits that will provide bodily injury, personal injury and property damage liability coverage at least as broad as the primary coverages set forth above, including commercial general liability, automobile liability, and employer’s liability. Such policy or policies shall include the following terms and conditions:
• A drop down feature requiring the policy to respond if any primary insurance that would otherwise have applied proves to be uncollectible in whole or in part for any reason;
• Pay on behalf of wording as opposed to reimbursement; • Concurrency of effective dates with primary policies; • Policies shall “follow form” to the underlying primary policies; and • Insureds under primary policies shall also be insureds under the umbrella or excess policies.
B. Other Provisions. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by the insurer or either Party to this Agreement, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City.
C. Other Requirements. Contractor agrees to deposit with City, at or before the effective date of this contract, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions of this contract have been complied with. The City Attorney may require that Contractor furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Section. The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
1. Upon request from the City, Contractor shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each subcontractor identical to those Contractor provides.
2. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims.
17.L
C-3
3. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Contractor’s liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement.
4. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by Agency shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of Agency before the Agency’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
5. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against Agency, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against Agency, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.
6. General liability policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that Agency and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies.
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 16 Attachment B
17.L
CEQA/NEPA COMPLIANCE | ENTITLEMENT & PROJECT MANAGEMENT | URBAN & POLICY PLANNING E | P | D Solutions, Inc.
EDUCATION
Master of Urban and
Regional Planning
University of California,
Irvine
Bachelor of Arts in
Geography
California State
University, Fullerton
PROFESSIONAL
AFFILIATIONS
Treasurer, Orange
County Association
of Environmental
Professionals
Member of San Diego
Section SB743 Subcommittee
Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE)
Orange County Traffic
Engineering Council
(OCTEC)
Meghan Macias, TE
Transportation Planning Director
PROFILE
Meghan’s primary responsibilities include preparation of technical analyses of transportation and land use, including comprehensive transportation impact analyses, traffic operations analyses, and parking studies. Meghan has worked on numerous and varied projects through California including land development, infrastructure, active transportation and Master/ Specific/ General Plans. Meghan has also prepared local analyses such as traffic signal warrant analyses, roadway speed evaluations and evaluation of acciden data. Meghan has a proven track record of managing complicated and controversial projects to achieve defensible and implementable solutions to technical issues.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING EXPERTISE
Meghan has over 20 years of experience in the transportation planning field and has worked on hundreds of projects throughout California. She has a deep understanding of the regulations and methodologies used by local and regional agencies including application of California Vehicle Code, CMP, CEQA requirements, Mitigation Fee Act, SB743, and the implementation of VMT analyses. Meghan uses her experience to provide strategic transportation planning services to public- and private- sector clients. Her work is focused on providing implementable solutions that satisfy various stakeholders including developers, local agencies, and affected citizens.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
•
Alta Vista Specific Plan Amendment, 54 DU and 10,500 sf restaurant, City of Placentia • Saddleback Stadium EIR Addendum, City of Mission Viejo, 8,000-seat stadium • LaVerne Elementary Prep Academy, City of Hesperia, charter school • Gemini Solar Project, Clark County, NV, 690-MW solar power plant •
• Chino Francis Estates, City of Chino, 43 homes
•
General Plan Circulation Element Amendment Traffic Modeling and Analysis, Hemet, CA • Highway 46 Logistics Center, Kern County, 2 million SF industrial • Metropolitan State Hospital Modernization, City of Norwalk, state hospital
CERTIFICATIONS
California Traffic
Engineer 2697
•
The Bowery, City of Santa Ana, 1,150 DU and 80,000 sf retail/ restaurant •
Bloomington Business Park, San Bernardino County, Approx 2 Million sf Industrial • Fern Avenue/Philadelphia Boulevard Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis, Ontario, CA City of Redlands VMT Screening Thresholds
17.L
CEQA/NEPA COMPLIANCE | ENTITLEMENT & PROJECT MANAGEMENT | URBAN & POLICY PLANNING E | P | D S ol ut ions , Inc .
EDUCATION
Masters in Urban Design
Carnegie Mellon University,
Pittsburgh
Abby Pal
Transportation Planner
PROFILE
Abby is a transportation planner with experience working on numerous safety analysis and traffic impact assessment for County and City Governments, and private developers in California. With more than 5 years of experience, Abby has conducted studies and assessments ranging from $8,000 to $1 million in budget. Her past experiences include working with multinational companies and non-profit organizations in the field of urban design, campus sustainability, and community outreach. Abby is adept in collision analysis, signing and striping plans, recommending safety infrastructure, traffic impact assessment for developments projects, vehicles miles traveled analysis, traffic calming, transit oriented development, urban redevelopment, sustainability, place-making, community outreach, GIS mapping analysis, and evaluation of cost-effectiveness. With demonstrated leadership and critical thinking, Abby has the ability to creatively solve complex transportation planning issues and deliver cost-effective solutions.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
• Engineering and Traffic Study, City of Gilroy
• Engineering and Traffic Study, City of Folsom
• Redlands and Placentia Industrial Development Traffic Impact and VMT Analysis, City of Perris
• Redlands and Placentia Industrial Development Signing and Striping Plan City of Perris
• Bloomington Business Park Specific Plan VMT Analysis, County of San Bernardino • Lakeshore Drive Residential Traffic Impact and VMT Analysis, City of Lake Elsinore
• Mission Trail Residential Traffic Impact and VMT Analysis, City of Lake Elsinore • 12950 Robleda Road Driveway Safety Study, City of Los Altos Hills • Systematic Safety Analysis Report, San Luis Obispo County • Regional Systematic Safety Analysis Report, Del Norte County • Systematic Safety Analysis Report, City of Dinuba
• Citywide Multimodal Improvement Plan, City of Mountain View • Eureka North-South Multimodal Corridor Study, City of Eureka • Dinuba Complete Streets, City of Dinuba
Bachelors of Arts in
Architecture,
Pune University,
Pune
PROFESSIONAL
AFFILIATIONS
Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE)
Member
17.L
CEQA/NEPA COMPLIANCE | ENTITLEMENT & PROJECT MANAGEMENT | URBAN & POLICY PLANNING E | P | D Solutions, Inc.
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Arts in
Environmental Studies
UC Santa Cruz
Environmental Management
Certification
UC Santa Cruz
PROFESSIONAL
AFFILIATIONS
Board Member:
Association of
Environmental
Professionals
Golden Key Society
Alex Garber
Transportation Planner
PROFILE
Alex has over four years of experience in the areas of environmental and traffic planning and analysis, and two years of air quality, energy, and greenhouse gas analysis. Alex has worked on traffic projects ranging from focused access studies to large mixed-use projects analyzing over 50 intersections, roadway segment analyses, and parking analyses.
Additionally, Alex has experience writing and completing air quality, energy, greenhouse gas, and health risk assessment analyses, spatial analyses using GIS software, as well as writing CEQA documents. The types of projects Alex has worked on include residential, industrial, commercial, institutional, solar utility, and mixed use at a development level, and specific plans at a planning level. Alex has also showed valuable leadership at EPD Solutions by starting the air quality, energy, GHG, and HRA discipline, as well as developing the transportation skills of new hires.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
• Muranaka Industrial Development Traffic Impact Analysis, County of Riverside • Sunnymead Marijuana Dispensary CEQA Exemption, City of Moreno Valley • 5770 Industrial Parkway AQ, Energy, GHG Report and Health Risk Assessment, San Bernardino County
• CSG Solar Projects Traffic Analysis and Air Quality and GHG Report, Kings County and Tulare County
• Covina Bowl Residential Redevelopment EIR, City of Covina • Santa Ana/Live Oak Warehouse Traffic Analysis and Air Quality, Energy, GHG Report, City of Fontana
• Desert Trails Elementary School Traffic Impact Analysis, City of Hesperia • The Bowery Traffic Impact Analysis, City of Santa Ana • Bloomington Business Park Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis and EIR, County of San Bernardino
• Kia Dealership MND, City of Moreno Valley
• Pavilion Plaza Traffic Impact Analysis, City of Garden Grove • Gemini Solar Due Diligence, Clark County Nevada
• Mandatory Minimum Parking Study, City of Santa Cruz
• Virgo Solar Feasibility Due Diligence, Nye County Nevada • Cornerstone Bible Church Traffic Analysis, City of Glendora • Temecula Winery Air Quality, Energy, GHG Report, County of Riverside
17.L
Hashem Basrawi,
Transportation/Traffic Engineer
E | P | D Solutions, Inc.
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in
Civil Engineering
CA Polytechnic State
University, Pomona
PROFILE
Hashem was placed on the honors list during his school career and initiated his civil engineering career as a traffic and transportation engineer. Since March 2021, Hashem managed numerous industrial, commercial, and industrial transportation-related projects including engineering and traffic surveys, local roadway safety plans, traffic impact analyses, traffic control assessments, parking studies, truck turning feasibility studies, access studies, and signing and striping plans in the Cities of Hesperia, Redlands, Grand Terrace, San Bernardino, Fontana, Rialto, Colton, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Chino Hills, Anaheim, Irvine, Lake Forest, Redondo Beach, Santa Fe Springs, South Gate, Huntington Park, South Pasadena, Guadalupe.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
• Engineering and Traffic Survey, City of Santa Fe Springs • Engineering and Traffic Survey, City of South Gate
• Local Roadway Safety Plan, City of Huntington Park
• Local Roadway Safety Plan, City of Guadalupe
• The Rincon Parking Demand Analysis, City of Chino Hills • Alessandro Walk Residential TIA, City of Moreno Valley • Moreno Beach Residential TIA, City of Moreno Valley
• Redlands and Placentia Industrial TIA, City of Perris • 9th and Tippecanoe Industrial TIA, City of San Bernardino • Pathways to College Charter School TIA, City of Hesperia • Sultana/Mesa Linda Industrial TIA, City of Hesperia
• KISS Industrial TIA, City of Hesperia
• 301 Tennessee Industrial TIA, City of Redlands
• Rancho Parkway Industrial TIA, City of Lake Forest
• Fitzgerald Industrial TIA, City of Rialto
• Fern Residential TIA, City of Ontario
• Waterford Parking Management Plan, City of Rancho Cucamonga TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Page 985 of 1236 | PROJECT MANAGEMENT | PLANNING | FEASIBILITY STUDIES
17.L
Rawad Hani, PE, TE
(213) 532-8221 | [email protected]
Rawad is a traffic engineer and transportation planner with over 20 years of experience.
He specializes in traffic engineering, parking studies, and technology applications.
Rawad has managed engineering design projects in the US and internationally where he advised public, private, and institutional clients. His recent experience includes assisting local governments across Southern California with projects ranging from signal designs to street lighting, traffic studies, parking management strategies and others. His design project experience includes the cities of San Bernardino, Lake Elsinore, Carson, Commerce, Santa Monica, Rancho Palos Verdes, Los Angeles, Glendora, Irvine, and Buena Park where he successfully delivered on numerous signal designs and modifications. Rawad understands the importance of striking the right balance between mobility and safety and has helped transportation agencies achieve effective solutions.
Recent project experience includes:
• City of Colton Engineering and Traffic Survey, Colton • On-Call Traffic Engineer, City of Rancho Palos Verdes • City of San Bernardino Signal Upgrades, San Bernardino • City of Glendora Local Road Safety Plan, Glendora
• Traffic Calming Analysis, La Habra Heights
• On-Call Traffic Engineer, City of Hermosa Beach
• Traffic Signal Modification of Central Ave/Ardenwood Way, Lake Elsinore • Festival at Moreno Valley Specific Plan TIS, Moreno Valley • Nature’s Medicines Traffic Impact Analysis, Moreno Valley • Encanto Residential Development Traffic Impact Analysis, Coachella • CVAG ITS Plan Review, Coachella Valley Association of Governments • Date Palm and Victoria Street Conceptual Design, Cathedral City • Thompson Village Traffic Analysis, Riverside County
• Government Center Master Plan, San Bernardino County
• City of Norwalk Traffic Control Plans, Norwalk
• Town of Apple Valley VMT Analysis, San Bernardino
• Commercial Development VMT Analysis, Hesperia
• Residential Development VMT Analysis, Victorville
• Alpine St, Vernon Dr and Palm Ave Street Lighting, Upland • Victorville Parking Simulation, Victorville, CA
• Dominguez Channel Bike Path, City of Carson
• Downtown Torrance Revitalization Plan, City of Torrance • Glendale Community College District EIR, Glendale
• 20th St Pedestrian and Bicycle Connection, Santa Monica • Notre Dame High School Traffic Analysis, Los Angeles
• Vroman’s Parking Lot Analysis, Pasadena, CA
• Foothill Blvd and Oak Tree Dr Warrant Analysis, Glendora • CSU Dominguez Hills Parking and Traffic Analysis, Carson
AREAS OF EXPERTISE
- Traffic Engineering
- Parking Analysis
- Transportation Planning
- Transportation Technology
Applications
EDUCATION
- BE Civil Engineering,
American University
- MS Civil Engineering,
American University
LICENSES
- Civil Engineer in CA, WA,
and FL
- Traffic Engineer in CA
CERTIFICATIONS
- Professional Transportation
Planner (PTP)
- Professional Traffic
Operations Engineer (PTOE)
- Roadway Safety
Professional (RSP1)
17.L
Resumes of Key Personnel - AimTD
OLGA POLUNIN, MBA
PRESIDENT AND CEO
Education: MBA, Loyola University, Chicago, 2002
Affiliations: Orange County Traffic Engineering
Council (OCTEC) – Past President & Board Member
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) - Member
Advancing Women in Transportation (WTS)- Member
Volunteer: SOCAL Water Polo
Accomplished Business Executive with 19 years of experience in IT and Transportation Industries. Known for high energy, flexibility in working with diverse customer base. Exceeds customer expectations consistently.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
2019 OCTA CMP Traffic Data Collection
The AimTD team was selected by Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCTA) to update the Congestion Management Program traffic data and analysis in 2019. We collected traffic data including turning movement counts at 101 intersections, roadway segment ADT, pedestrian/bicycle/E-scooter counts.
Served as a Project Director.
2019 and 2017 Citywide Intersection Turning
Movement Counts City of Pleasanton
AimTD was selected to conduct Biannual Citywide
Intersection Turning Movement Counts at 155 intersections, including Pedestrian counts per crosswalk, Bicycle counts, bus and heavy truck volumes and
percentages.
Served as a Project Manager.
2017 Cal Poly Pomona University - Parking Occupancy Study Project Management of Parking Occupancy Study.
The study was conducted for 2 weekdays, 15,000
spaces that included several parking structures,
parking lots and on-street parking.
Citywide Multimodal Study, City of Santa Monica
2015 Multimodal study included Vehicle Turning
Movement Counts, Pedestrians and Bicycle Counts
and Saturation Flow Analysis- 385 locations.
Was responsible for overall project management including coordination between Project Managers, Data Collection and Data Processing Managers. Served as the main point of contact with the City.
2015 Intersection Turning Movement Counts, City
of Mission Viejo
Responsible for the project management, the project
included vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian turning
movement volumes for each intersection and was
conducted at twenty- one signalized locations along
the La Paz Road Corridor and the Alicia Parkway
Corridor.
2015 I710 – Shoemaker Bridge Replacement Project Traffic Operations Analysis Report, Long Beach, CA
Responsible for the overall project management that
included Intersection Turning Movement Counts and
24hr ADT Traffic Data Collection.
17.L
Resumes of Key Personnel: AimTD
2019 OCTA CMP Traffic Data Collection
The AimTD team was selected by Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCTA) to update the Congestion Management Program traffic data and analysis in 2019. We collected traffic data including turning movement counts at 101 intersections, roadway segment ADT, pedestrian/bicycle/E-scooter counts.
Served as a Project Manager.
2019, 2017 and 2015 Citywide Traffic Counts, City
of Santa Monica
Project management of Citywide Traffic Counts
including 370 intersections to provide Vehicle, Bicycle, Pedestrians and E-scooters counts.
2014 Bake Parkway Road Traffic Signal Synchronization Project, TSSP, OCTA Project Manager for Traffic Data Collection including
Intersection Turning Movement Counts and Average
Daily Counts. AimTD collected Intersection Traffic
Data at 19 signalized intersections. Data provided in
Universal Traffic Data Format (UTDF) Synchro format
as well as ASCII.
Pot of Long Beach 2018 - Present
On-Call Traffic Data Collection
Project Management of Port-wide Roadway seg- ment
counts, approximately 250 locations annually.
Intersection Turning Movement counts at 30 locations annually. AimTD also conducted Classification counts, Speed/delay runs, Marine terminal gate
counts and Bicycle/Pedestrian counts.
2018 - Present, City of Pasadena
On-Call Traffic Data Collection
Project Management including Intersection Turning
Movement Counts, Average Daily Traffic Counts and
Speed Surveys. All data is inputted into MS2
database as per City of Pasadena's requirements.
2019– 2022 City of Los Angeles, DOT
On- Call Traffic Data Collection
Project management of 24-hour Average Daily Traffic counts, Intersection Turning Movement counts (6- hour LADOT format), Speed Surveys, Bicycle/
Pedestrian/E-Scooter Screenline Counts,
Pedestrian Crossing and Bicyclist Intersection
Counts.
EDWARD POLUNIN
COO AND PROJECT MANAGER
Education: BS, Business Administration, DePaul University, Chicago, 1995 Edward is responsible for operations, project management, supervision and quality control for projects such as installation of video equipment to conduct Intersection Turning Movement Counts (TMC), manual FHWA classification (ADT) Volume Counts for traffic studies. He has directly managed and supervised projects with combined total of over 20,000 traffic count locations.
17.L
Resumes of Key Personnel: AimTD
JAVIER CORREA
Traffic Data Collection Manager
Education: Certified Technician and Certified Radar Operator __________________________________________________________________________________________________
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
2019 OCTA CMP Traffic Data Collection
The AimTD team was selected by Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCTA) to update the Congestion Management Program traffic data and analysis in 2019. We collected traffic data including turning movement counts at 101 intersections, roadway segment ADT, pedestrian/bicycle/E-scooter counts.
Served as a Field Manager and Traffic Technician.
2021-2022 Traffic Counts, City of Santa Monica
Collected traffic counts to provide Vehicles, Bicycle,
Pedestrian Counts and E-scooter counts. Served as a
Traffic Technician.
2021 – 2022 Traffic Counts, City of Chino Hills
On-Call Traffic Data Collection
Collected traffic counts to provide Vehicles, Bicycle,
Pedestrian Counts and Speed Surveys on as needed
Basis.
.
Port of Long Beach: 2021-
2022 On-Call Traffic Data
Collection
Traffic Data Collection of Port-wide Roadway segment counts, approximately 250 locations annually.
Intersection Turning Movement counts at 30 locations
annually. Also collected Classification counts, Speed/
delay runs, Marine terminal gate counts and Bicycle/
Pedestrian counts.
2021 – Present: City of Pasadena
On-Call Traffic Data Collection
Collected traffic counts including Intersection Turning Movement Counts, Average Daily Traffic Counts and
Speed Surveys.
2021 – Present: LADOT
On - Call Traffic Data Collection
Collected Traffic Counts including 24-hour Average
Daily Traffic counts, Intersection Turning Movement
counts (6-hour LADOT format), Speed Surveys, Bicycle/Pedestrian/E-Scooter Screenline Counts, Pedestrian Crossing and Bicyclist Intersection Counts.
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 17 Attachment C
17.L
Project Location Assignment
Meghan
Macias
Abby
Pal
Alex
Garber
Hashem
Basrawi
Tract 20407 Glen Helen San Bernardino County General Plan LOS Analysis X Simpson Road Hemet Hemet Traffic Impact Analysis and VMT Analysis X Kirby Street Hemet Hemet Traffic Impact Analysis and VMT Analysis X Hemet 63 Hemet Traffic Impact Analysis and VMT Analysis X The Vineyard Specific Plan Murrietta Traffic Impact Analysis and VMT Analysis XX Lakeshore Drive Residential Lake Elsinore Traffic Impact Analysis X Mission Trail Residential Lake Elsinore Traffic Impact Analysis and VMT Analysis XX Countyline Road Warehouse Yucaipa, CA Traffic Impact Analysis XX Ethanac and Barnett Warehouse Perris
Traffic Impact Analysis and VMT Analysis, Striping and Signal Design X
Redlands & Placentia Industrial Perris
Traffic Impact Analysis and VMT Analysis, Striping and Access Design XX X
Ramona and Webster Industrial Perris Focused Traffic Analysis X Perris Airport Industrial Perris Finalize Queuing Memo XX Harvest Landing Mixed-Use Perris Specific Plan Circulation, Traffic Impact Analysis, VMT Analysis X Ramona and Brennan Industrial Perris Access Study/waiting for counts X Palmdale Logistics Center Palmdale Traffic Impact Analysis and VMT Analysis X XX Fern Ontario Ontario Signal Warrant Analysis XX
Francis Street Ontario Ontario VMT Analysis XX
Pepper Avenue Industrial Rialto Traffic Impact Analysis, Access Design for future Specific Plan XX Bloomington Business Park
Bloomington, San Bernardino
County Traffic Impact Analysis and VMT Analysis X
Temecula Valley Charter School Riverside County Traffic Impact Analysis and VMT Analysis X XX Pathways to College Charter School Hesperia Traffic Impact Analysis and VMT Analysis XX Trumark Residential Claremont Claremont
Traffic Impact Analysis and VMT Analysis, Roadway Safety Analysis XX X
9th/Tippecanoe San Bernardino Traffic Impact Analysis and VMT Analysis XX Rio Vista Specific Plan Jurupa Valley Traffic Impact Analysis and VMT Analysis X Waterford Mixed-Use Rancho Cucamonga Parking Management Plan XX Current Staff Commitment 90% 85% 90% 80%
Client Contact Projects
Mike Tunney, Vice President Bloomington Business Park
Howard Industrial Partners Pepper Avenue Industrial
2244 N. Pacific Street Harvest Landing
Orange, CA 92865
714-637-3333
[email protected]
Jorge Estrada, Senior Associate II Temecula Valley Charter School Placeworks Trumark Residential
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Pathways to College Charter School Santa Ana, CA 92707
714-966-9220 ext. 2366
[email protected]
Stephen Batcheller, Partner Countyline Road Warehouse
Transwestern Development Company Palmdale Logistics Center 3501 Jamboree, Suite 4400
Newport Beach, CA 92660
949-351-5186
[email protected]
Staff Assigned
Current Assignments and Staff Availability
17.L
Proposal for City of Hemet Engineering and Traffic Survey 18 Appendix
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
17.L
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Draft Report
Prepared for: City of Colton
May 2022
GTS.210203
GTS
1055 W 7th Street, Suite 3300
Los Angeles, CA 90017
T. 213 267 2332
www.gentecsol.com
Prepared by:
17.L
2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton
i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 2 Background ............................................................................................................. 4 Regulatory Requirements ....................................................................................... 6 California Vehicle Code (CVC) ................................................................................................ 6 City Municipal Code ............................................................................................................... 8 Methodology ............................................................................................................ 9 Data Collection ...................................................................................................................... 9 Speed Survey .................................................................................................................... 9 Roadway Characteristics ................................................................................................ 10 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) ............................................................................................ 10 Collision Rates ...................................................................................................................... 10 Analysis ................................................................................................................. 14 Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 14 Results and Recommendations ........................................................................................... 17 Appendices
Appendix A: Speed Survey Summary Sheets
Appendix B: Speed Survey Data
Appendix C: Radar Certifications
Appendix D: Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Volumes
List of Figures
Figure 1. Street Segments and Recommended Speed Limits ................................................... 3 List of Tables
Table 1: Study Street Segments ................................................................................................ 5 Table 2. City of Colton Section 15.a Prima Facie Speed Limits ................................................. 8 Table 3. 2019 Expected Collision Rates .................................................................................. 11 Table 4: Collision Data per Segments ..................................................................................... 12 Table 5: Speed Zoning Analysis ............................................................................................... 15
17.L
2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton
2 Executive Summary
Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices.
This Engineering and Traffic Survey report was requested by and prepared for the City of Colton to provide the City with a basis for updating and validating the currently posted speed limits on citywide streets.
This study recommends the establishment and renewal of valid posted speed limits for fortyfour (44) street segments on twenty-six (26) citywide streets within the City of Colton.
The report was prepared in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC) including the most recent revisions effective January 1, 2022 and the latest revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) at the time of this study.
In establishing the appropriate posted speed limits, the analysis presented in the following pages takes into consideration the analysis of prevailing speeds, the collision history, and other traffic and road factors not readily apparent to the driver. Such factors include sight distance, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, pedestrian and bicyclist activity and safety, the 10-MPH pace range of prevailing traffic, roadside development and environment, parking practices, the density of adjacent residential and/or business uses, among others.
The draft findings of this Engineering and Traffic Survey reveal that all 44 surveyed street segments are recommended to remain at their currently established speed limits as documented and would not require any changes to the existing posted regulatory signage or speed limit pavement markings. This is driven, among other reasons, by the high number of speed related collisions on City streets, which implies that maintaining the existing speed zones is the most prudent decision despite an increase in the 85th percentile speed on some segments. One segment in particular Hunts Lane from W Redland Blvd to Washington Street in shared jurisdiction with City of San Bernardino requires coordination between the two cities to ensure consistency between both directions.
Figure 1 illustrates the street segments with recommended speed limits.
The following pages provide the supporting documentation of the survey’s methodology and findings. Following a brief background, the report is organized under three main headings that summarize the regulatory requirements, present the data collection and collision rates, and describe the analysis, results and recommendations. Appendix A summarizes the existing conditions, collision rates, recommended speed zones for each of the study segments.
17.L
FIGURE 1: CITY OF COLTON RECOMMENDED SPEED ZONES
17.L
2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton
4 Background
The purpose of the 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey is to evaluate the speed limit of selected streets within the City of Colton (City), San Bernardino County. This study is required by the State of California to establish speed limits and maintain eligibility of enforcement on City roads in accordance with procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD) and California Vehicle Code (CVC).
The CVC authorizes local government bodies to establish effective and enforceable speed limits on city highways. The CVC Code sets the regulatory framework for Engineering and Traffic Surveys and describes the contributing factors in establishing speed limits being speed data, collision history, and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the road users. Several section of the CVC relevant to this study have been updated effective January 1, 2022. These sections were reviewed, summarized in the following chapter, and their requirements were incorporated as part of this study.
The CA-MUTCD defines standards and guidelines for establishing speed limits based on collecting speed data using radar or other electronic devices that measure the speed of moving objects to determine the change in the existing posted speed limit. This study is developed in compliance with the CA-MUTCD and California Vehicle Code mandates.
The street segments included in this study were determined based on pre-existing zone designations from earlier speed surveys, existing conditions observed in the field, and in consultation with City staff. A total 44 segments on 26 city wide streets were identified within the City’s jurisdiction. The segments are summarized in Table 1.
Per current regulations, the established speed limits in this study will be valid for seven years and can be further extended to fourteen years if no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume.
The following sections of this report are organized under three main headings:
- Regulatory Requirements: summarizing the more relevant elements of the CVC - Methodology: presenting the data collection and collision rates - Analysis: presenting the analysis, results and recommendations
17.L
2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton
5 Table 1: Study Street Segments
STREET SEGMENT LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2
1. AGUA MANSA ROAD S. Riverside Avenue S. Rancho Avenue
2. BARTON ROAD Washington Street South City Boundary Limits
3. BARTON ROAD S. La Cadena Drive E. City limits (UPRR)
4. "C" STREET N. Rancho Avenue Colton Avenue
5. COLTON AVENUE North City limit (Lytle Cajon Channel) E."E" Street
6. CENTER STREET S. Riverside Avenue/Main Street S. City Limits
7. COOLEY DRIVE E. Cooley Lane Washington Street
8. COOLEY DRIVE S. Mount Vernon Avenue E. Cooley Lane
9. EUCALYPTUS AVENUE W. Randall Avenue San Bernardino Avenue
10. FAIRWAY DRIVE N. Mount Vernon Avenue Auto Plaza Drive
11. HUNTS LANE W. Redlands Boulevard Washington Street
12. LA CADENA DRIVE N. Mount Vernon Avenue N. 8th Street
13. LA CADENA DRIVE N. 8th Street Valley Boulevard
14. LA CADENA DRIVE Valley Boulevard BNSF Railroad Overpass
15. LA CADENA DRIVE BNSF Railroad Overpass S. City Limits
16. LAUREL STREET Grand Avenue Pennsylvania Avenue
17. LAUREL STREET Pennsylvania Avenue N. Mount Vernon Avenue
18. "M" STREET S. la Cadena Drive Mount Vernon Avenue
19. MERIDIAN AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley Boulevard
20. MILL STREET N. Rancho Avenue BNSF Railroad Overpass
21. MOUNT VERNON Johnston Street E. Citrus Street/Grant Avenue
22. MOUNT VERNON E. Citrus Street/ Grant Avenue E. Valley Boulevard
23. MOUNT VERNON E. Valley Boulevard Cooley Drive
24. MOUNT VERNON Cooley Drive Washington Street
25. CITRUS STREET Teresa Avenue Rancho Avenue
26. OLIVE STREET Meridian Avenue Railroad
27. OLIVE STREET N. Rancho Avenue N. La Cadena Avenue
28. PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE Mill Street W. Valley Boulevard
29. PEPPER AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley Boulevard
30. RANCHO AVENUE N. City Limit Mill Street
31. RANCHO AVENUE Mill Street W. Valley Boulevard
32. RANCHO AVENUE Agua Mansa Road S. La Cadena Drive
33. RANCHO AVENUE W. Valley Boulevard Agua Mansa Road
34. RECHE CANYON ROAD Washington Street S. City Limit
35. RIVERSIDE AVENUE Agua Mansa Road Placentia Lane
36. RV CENTER DRIVE 600 E Washington Street 1000 E Washington Street
37. SAN BERNARDINO N. Pepper Avenue Meridian Avenue
38. SAN BERNARDINO N. Sycamore Avenue N. Pepper Avenue
39. VALLEY BOULEVARD W. City Limits N. Pepper Avenue
40. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Pepper Avenue N. Rancho Avenue
41. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Rancho Avenue N. Mount Vernon Avenue
42. WASHINGTON STREET West End S. Mount Vernon Avenue
43. WASHINGTON STREET S. Mount Vernon Avenue Reche Canyon Road
44. WASHINGTON STREET Reche Canyon Road Waterman Avenue
17.L
2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton
6 Regulatory Requirements
California Vehicle Code (CVC)
The California Vehicle Code presents regulations for establishing and enforcing speed zones.
These regulations generally reflect the perspective that speed zoning should be based on traffic conditions and normal driver behavior. This section highlights relevant sections of the CVC considered in establishing speed limits. For a detailed review of applicable codes, the reader is referred to the California Vehicle Code that can be accessed online via https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/.
CVC Section 235, 240, and 515: define respectively the “business district”, the determination of business and residence districts, and residence district.
CVC Section 627: defines the “Engineering and traffic survey,” and stipulated that it shall include considerations for prevailing speeds, accident records, and highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. Local authorities may also consider residential density as well as safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
CVC Section 22348: stipulates that a person shall not drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than that speed limit.
CVC Section 22349: sets a maximum speed limit for highways at 65 mph and for two-lane undivided highways at 55 mph (unless posted otherwise)
CVC Section 22350: establishes the Basic speed Law which states that a person shall not drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent with due regard for weather, visibility, and traffic. The speed shall not endanger the safety of persons or property.
CVC Section 22352: defines Prima facia (at first impression) speed limits that are considered safe and prudent under normal conditions. This section establishes the 15 mph prima facia speed limits when traversing a railroad grade crossing, traversing intersections with restricted sight distance, and in alleyways. This section also establishes 25 mph prima facie speed limits in a business or residence district (as defined per CVC Sections 235 and 515), when approaching or passing a school building when children are present, or when passing a senior center.
CVC Section 22357 & 22358: authorize local agencies to respectively increase and decrease speed limits in a reasonable and safe manner on local streets to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic. Based on an engineering and traffic survey, a local agency may declare
17.L
2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton
7 a prima facie speed limits of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, or a maximum speed of 65 miles per hour.
CVC Section 22358.6: states that (effective January 1, 2022) in cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment.
CVC Section 22358.7: authorizes a local authority to determine and declare (by ordinance) a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour if (1) a portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor; (2) a portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians; however, this section will only be applicable after June 30, 2024 or possibly an earlier date when the Judicial Council have developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations.
CVC Section 22358.8: authorizes (effective January 1, 2022) a local authority to retain (by ordinance) the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit. This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the current speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit.
CVC Section 22358.9: authorizes (effective January 1, 2022) a local authority to determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when the highways are a maximum of four traffic lanes. This section can not be used when the speed limit has been lowered per Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8 noted earlier, and the maximum posted prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district shall be respectively 30 mph or 25 mph, if establishing a 25 mph or 20 mph speed limit.
The same section states that for a “business activity district” designation, at least three of the following four conditions shall be met: (1) no less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses; (2) parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway; (3) traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet; (4) marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device.
CVC Section 40802 (Division 17, Chapter 3): defines a speed a speed trap, which is found to exist, a citation will likely be dismissed. Effective January 1, 2002, a speed trap exists if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation. The period can be increased to 14 years if a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred.
17.L
2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton
8 This section also defines the “school zone”, the “senior zone” and the “local street or road”.
A 25-mph speed limit can be established without conducting a speed survey on a local road if it has a width of less than 40 feet, no more than one lane per direction, and less than half a mile of uninterrupted length.
City Municipal Code
In the City’s municipal code (Section 15.a), the City of Colton determined and declared the prima facie speed limit for four streets segments that are presented in the Table 2.
Table 2. City of Colton Section 15.a Prima Facie Speed Limits Street Name Limit 1 Limit 2 Prima Facia Speed
Limit
I Street 10th Street Mount Vernon 35 MPH
Mount Vernon Colton Avenue I Street 35 MPH
N La Cadena Mount Vernon 8th Street 35 MPH
Colton Avenue 10th Street Fairview 35 MPH
17.L
2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton
9 Methodology
The current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California-MUTCD) specifies the methodology to be used for completing Engineering and Traffic Surveys. This methodology includes the evaluation of existing speed, collision history and roadway conditions not readily apparent to road users. This methodology is based around a spot speed survey that typically consists of measuring speeds, with a radar or other electronics device, of a free-flowing traffic. The statistical speed parameter, 85th percentile speed limit is used to establish speed limit.
Per Section 2B-13 of California MUTCD, when a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. However, roadway conditions that are not readily apparent to motorist may result in further reduction of 5 mph in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.
Data Collection
As speed zones are established based on existing speed data, recent collision history, and roadside conditions that might not be readily apparent to road users, GTS carried out a radar speed survey, reviewed field conditions and analyzed the recent collision history for the identified 44 roadway segments on 26 citywide streets within the City of Colton. Data of field conditions obtained includes roadway characteristics, current speed data, average daily traffic (ADT), and collisions.
Speed Survey
Spot radar speed surveys were conducted to determine the prevailing speed of drivers on each of the 44 segment locations during March 2022. The surveys were performed during typical weekdays between 9 A.M. to 2 P.M. with a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles.
Speed survey data for each of the segments is provided in Appendix B and the radar (and radar operator) certifications are provided in Appendix C.
The speed-related statistical parameters were extracted from speed survey data, prime among which are the 85th percentile speed and 10-mph pace. - 85th percentile speed also known as critical speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving, and critically represent one standard deviation above the average speed. According to current regulations, the 85th percentile speed should be the starting point for establishing of the prima facie speed. - 10 mph pace is defined as the range in which the largest number of observations fall.
Normally, sixty to seventy percent of free-flowing vehicles drive within the 10 mile per hour pace speed. It is a general practice that the recommended speed limit should be within 10 mph pace.
17.L
2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton
10 Roadway Characteristics
Existing roadway conditions for the 44 study segments were collected based on field observations and desktop analysis. Roadway conditions were collected for each study segments and include but not limited to abutting land uses (residential, business, or commercial), lane configurations, proximity to schools, on-street parking, visibility restrictions (sight distance), pedestrian activity and presence of crosswalks, as well as geometric constraints (narrow streets, horizontal and vertical curves, skewed intersections, steep slopes, etc.)
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
The 24-hour average daily traffic volumes for the 44 segments were collected from machine traffic counters in the field during a typical weekday. These counts are used to calculate the collision rates discussed below. The ADT data for each segment is provided as Appendix D.
Collision Rates
The number of collisions on each segment were obtained using the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), Safe Transportation Research and Education Center, University of California, Berkeley.
Collision data was obtained for a 4-year period between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2020. From the collected collision data, collisions by speeding were separated to determine the percentage of collisions due to unsafe speed.
A collision rate, expressed in terms of collisions per million vehicle miles traveled, is calculated on each segment based on several parameters including average daily traffic, segment length and analysis period in days as shown in the equation below.
Collision Rate =
Total No. of Collisions x 1,000,000
Distance x ADT x No. of Days
Where:
- Total No. of Collisions: Total Number of collisions on the segment during the analysis period (4 years), both directions
- ADT: Average Daily Traffic (veh/day), both directions - Distance: Roadway segment distance travelled by each vehicle (miles) - No. of Days: Number of days during the selected analysis period (4 years = 1,460 days) The calculated collision rates were calculated for each segment.
To evaluate collision rates that can be reasonably expected, the study segment collision rates were compared to collision rates on segments of similar characteristics with Caltrans District 8 (San Bernardino and Riverside counties) using the 2019 Crash Data on California State Highways, Caltrans. Table 3 illustrates the 2019 average collision rates per roadway type.
17.L
2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton
11 Table 3. 2019 Expected Collision Rates
Roadway Type
(Urban)
Expected Collision Rate
(Collisions per million vehicle miles)
2 Lane And 3 Lane 1.08
4+ Undivided 0.86
4+ Divided 1.33
Source: 2019 Crash Data on California State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates). Issued by: The California Department of Transportation
These statewide average collision rates (expected rates) which vary based on the roadway types are compared with the collision rates on the study segments to evaluate the safety issues. The results of the collision analysis showing calculated collision rate per segment are presented in Table 4.
Table 4 shows that 34 out of 44 segments have collision rates that exceed those of the expected collision rates.
17.L
2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton
12 Table 4: Collision Data per Segments
STREET LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2 LENGTH
(MILES)
ADT1
(VEH/DAY)
NO. OF
COLLISIONS2
SPEEDING
COLLISIONS
3 EXPECTED
(C/MVM)4
CALCULATED
(C/MVM)5
1. AGUA MANSA ROAD S. Riverside Avenue S. Rancho Avenue 2.3 9,002 15 4 1.08 0.50
2. BARTON ROAD Washington Street South City Boundary 0.44 16,352 15 7 1.08 1.43
3. BARTON ROAD S. La Cadena Drive E. City Limits (UPRR) 0.22 9,519 2 0 1.08 0.65
4. "C" STREET N. Rancho Avenue Colton Avenue 1.1 4,923 13 2 1.08 1.64
5. COLTON AVENUE North City limit (Lytle
Cajon Channel) E."E" Street 0.93 7,688 11 0 1.08 1.05
6. CENTER STREET S. Riverside Avenue /
Main Street S. City Limits 0.75 5,124 0 0 1.08 0.00
7. COOLEY DRIVE E. Cooley Lane Washington Street 0.5 9,076 13 3 1.33 1.96
8. COOLEY DRIVE S. Mount Vernon Avenue E. Cooley Lane 1.5 7,163 25 7 1.33 1.59
9. EUCALYPTUS
AVENUE W. Randall Avenue San Bernardino Avenue 0.5 3,146 11 1 1.08 4.79
10. FAIRWAY DRIVE N. Mount Vernon
Avenue
Auto Plaza Drive 0.8 8,307 30 4 1.08 3.09
11. HUNTS LANE W. Redlands Boulevard Washington Street 0.9 9,745 20 3 0.86 1.56
12. LA CADENA DRIVE N. Mount Vernon
Avenue
N. 8th Street 0.6 3,966 9 1 1.33 2.59
13. LA CADENA DRIVE N. 8th Street Valley Boulevard 0.9 3,274 37 3 1.08 8.60
14. LA CADENA DRIVE Valley Boulevard BNSF Railroad Overpass 0.8 16,483 26 3 0.86 1.35
15. LA CADENA DRIVE BNSF Railroad Overpass S. City Limits 2.2 21,930 28 4 1.33 0.40
16. LAUREL STREET Grand Avenue Pennsylvania Avenue 0.6 3,196 6 0 1.08 2.14
17. LAUREL STREET Pennsylvania Avenue N. Mount Vernon Avenue 0.76 3,651 11 0 1.08 2.72
18. "M" STREET S. la Cadena Drive Mount Vernon Avenue 0.8 4,039 15 5 1.08 3.18
19. MERIDIAN AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley Boulevard 1.1 7,921 13 3 1.08 1.02
20. MILL STREET N. Rancho Avenue BNSF Railroad Overpass 0.58 13,127 30 2 1.08 2.70
21. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE
Johnston Street E. Citrus Street / Grant
Avenue
0.26 13,178 11 2 0.86 2.20
22. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE
E. Citrus Street/ Grant
Avenue E. Valley Boulevard 1.35 11,298 59 9 0.86 2.65
23. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE E. Valley Boulevard Cooley Drive 1 20,447 19 8 1.08 0.64
17.L
2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton
13 STREET LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2 LENGTH
(MILES)
ADT1
(VEH/DAY)
NO. OF
COLLISIONS2
SPEEDING
COLLISIONS
3 EXPECTED
(C/MVM)4
CALCULATED
(C/MVM)5
24. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE Cooley Drive Washington Street 0.44 9,704 19 6 1.33 3.05
25. CITRUS STREET Teresa Avenue Rancho Avenue 0.46 2,798 8 2 1.08 4.26
26. OLIVE STREET Meridian Avenue Railroad 1.36 3,980 13 1 1.08 1.65
27. OLIVE STREET N. Rancho Avenue N. La Cadena Avenue 0.7 3,266 15 0 1.08 4.49
28. PENNSYLVANIA
AVENUE
Mill Street W. Valley Boulevard 1.7 4,315 15 1 1.08 1.40
29. PEPPER AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley Boulevard 1 22,928 59 18 1.08 1.76
30. RANCHO AVENUE N. City Limit Mill Street 0.9 8,000 15 0 0.86 1.43
31. RANCHO AVENUE Mill Street W. Valley Boulevard 1.6 17,529 74 14 0.86 1.81
32. RANCHO AVENUE Agua Mansa Road S. La Cadena Drive 0.4 10,470 14 4 0.86 2.29
33. RANCHO AVENUE W. Valley Boulevard Agua Mansa Road 1.07 17,061 26 9 0.86 0.98
34. RECHE CANYON
ROAD Washington Street S. City Limit 2 28,007 41 15 1.08 0.50
35. RIVERSIDE AVENUE Agua Mansa Road Placentia Lane 1.35 23,482 16 5 0.86 0.35
36. RV CENTER DRIVE 600 E Washington Street 1000 E Washington Street 0.6 1,805 8 1 1.08 5.06
37. SAN BERNARDINO
AVENUE N. Pepper Avenue Meridian Avenue 0.25 5,969 37 7 1.08 16.98
38. SAN BERNARDINO
AVENUE N. Sycamore Avenue N. Pepper Avenue 0.74 10,748 43 7 1.08 3.70
39. VALLEY BOULEVARD W. City Limits N. Pepper Avenue 0.74 9,515 25 3 0.86 2.43
40. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Pepper Avenue N. Rancho Avenue 1.02 11,709 30 6 0.86 1.72
41. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Rancho Avenue N. Mount Vernon Avenue 1.27 10,182 64 13 1.33 3.39
42. WASHINGTON
STREET West End S. Mount Vernon Avenue 0.93 4,591 13 2 1.33 2.09
43. WASHINGTON
STREET S. Mount Vernon Avenue Reche Canyon Road 1.19 24,251 63 18 0.86 1.50
44. WASHINGTON
STREET Reche Canyon Road Waterman Avenue 0.65 25,821 28 9 1.33 1.14 Notes:
(1) ADT: Average Daily Traffic (2) Number of Collisions (3) Number of speed-related collisions (4) Expected Collisions (C) per Million Vehicles Miles (MVM) (5) Calculated Collision Rate
17.L
2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton
14 Analysis
Data Analysis
This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to establish prima facie speed limits for 44 surveyed roadway segments in the City of Colton, based on a thorough evaluation of the collected data and standard speed zoning practice. Prima Facie speed limits serve to advise drivers and law enforcement of what is the reasonable and prudent speed under normal conditions.
The starting criteria used to recommend the speed limit is the nearest 5-MPH increment to the 85th percentile speed. Consideration is then given to the conditions that might cause a change in the speed limit such as above-average collision rates, land use characteristics, pedestrian activity, the 10-mph pace, and roadway conditions that might not be readily apparent to road users, among others.
Table X summarizes the speed zone analysis for the roadway segments under consideration.
The following section summarizes the results and recommendations.
17.L
2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton
15 Table 5: Speed Zoning Analysis
STREET NAME
SEGMENT LIMITS ROAD CHARACTERISTICS SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2 LENGTH
(MILES)
NO.
OF
LANES
CLASS1
10-MPH
PACE
(MPH)
% IN 10-
MPH
PACE
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED (MPH)
POSTED
SPEED
(MPH)
RECOMMENDED
SPEED (MPH)
1. AGUA MANSA ROAD S. Riverside Avenue S. Rancho Avenue 2.3 2 MA 41-50 87% 49.2 45 45
2. BARTON ROAD Washington Street South City
Boundary Limits
0.44 2 MA 43-52 78% 51.4 50 50
3. BARTON ROAD S. La Cadena Drive E. City limits
(UPRR)
0.22 2 MA 39-48 67% 47.9 45 45
4. "C" STREET N. Rancho Avenue Colton Avenue 1.1 2 CO 25-34 75% 33.7 30 30
5. COLTON AVENUE North City limit (LYTLE
Cajon Channel)
E."E" Street 0.93 2 MA 30-39 92% 38.8 35 35
6. CENTER STREET S. Riverside
Avenue/Main Street
S. City Limits 0.75 2 MA 36-45 74% 42.8 40 40
7. COOLEY DRIVE E. Cooley Lane Washington Street 0.5 4 MA 28-37 77% 38.6 35 35
8. COOLEY DRIVE S. Mount Vernon
Avenue
E. Cooley Lane 1.5 4 MA 34-43 71% 44 40 40
9. EUCALYPTUS
AVENUE
W. Randall Avenue San Bernardino
Avenue
0.5 2 CO 24-33 84% 32.9 30 30
10. FAIRWAY DRIVE N. Mount Vernon
Avenue
Auto Plaza Drive 0.8 2 SA 30-39 68% 40.9 35 35
11. HUNTS LANE W. Redlands Boulevard Washington Street 0.9 4 SA 32-41 51% 44.4 40 40
12. LA CADENA DRIVE N. Mount Vernon
Avenue
N. 8th Street 0.6 4 MA 29-38 89% 37.2 35 35
13. LA CADENA DRIVE N. 8th Street Valley Boulevard 0.9 2 MA 28-37 82% 35.5 35 35
14. LA CADENA DRIVE Valley Boulevard BNSF Railroad
Overpass
0.8 4 MA 37-46 58% 49.8 45 45
15. LA CADENA DRIVE BNSF Railroad Overpass S. City Limits 2.2 4 MA 46-55 74% 55.9 50 50
16. LAUREL STREET Grand Avenue Pennsylvania
Avenue
0.6 2 CO 31-40 80% 39.7 35 35
17. LAUREL STREET Pennsylvania Avenue N. Mount Vernon
Avenue
0.76 2 CO 27-36 79% 38.1 35 35
18. "M" STREET S. la Cadena Drive Mount Vernon
Avenue
0.8 2 CO 32-41 72% 43.5 40 40
19. MERIDIAN AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley
Boulevard
1.1 2 CO 34-43 80% 42.9 40 40
20. MILL STREET N. Rancho Avenue BNSF Railroad
Overpass
0.58 2 MA 34-43 65% 42.7 40 40
21. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE
Johnston Street E. Citrus St / Grant
Ave
0.26 4 MA 20-29 86% 28.3 25 25
22. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE
E. Citrus Street/ Grant
Avenue
E. Valley Boulevard 1.35 4 MA 32-41 68% 46.1 40 40
17.L
2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Colton
16 STREET NAME
SEGMENT LIMITS ROAD CHARACTERISTICS SPEED ZONING ANALYSIS LIMIT 1 LIMIT 2 LENGTH
(MILES)
NO.
OF
LANES
CLASS1
10-MPH
PACE
(MPH)
% IN 10-
MPH
PACE
85TH
PERCENTILE
SPEED (MPH)
POSTED
SPEED
(MPH)
RECOMMENDED
SPEED (MPH)
23. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE
E. Valley Boulevard Cooley Drive 1 2 MA 29-38 77% 39.3 35 35
24. MOUNT VERNON
AVENUE
Cooley Drive Washington Street 0.44 4 MA 30-39 69% 39.4 35 35
25. CITRUS STREET Teresa Avenue Rancho Avenue 0.46 2 CO 27-36 77% 35.1 25 25
26. OLIVE STREET Meridian Avenue Railroad 1.36 2 MA 24-33 77% 31.9 30 30
27. OLIVE STREET N. Rancho Avenue N. La Cadena
Avenue
0.7 2 SA 21-30 74% 31.6 25 25
28. PENNSYLVANIA
AVENUE
Mill Street W. Valley
Boulevard
1.7 2 CO 27-36 77% 37.7 35 35
29. PEPPER AVENUE Randall Avenue W. Valley
Boulevard
1 3 MA 39-48 50% 49.9 45 45
30. RANCHO AVENUE N. City Limit Mill Street 0.9 4 MA 34-43 64% 43.5 40 40
31. RANCHO AVENUE Mill Street W. Valley
Boulevard
1.6 4 MA 31-40 66% 43.8 35 35
32. RANCHO AVENUE Agua Mansa Road S. La Cadena Drive 0.4 4 MA 42-51 83% 51.1 45 45
33. RANCHO AVENUE W. Valley Boulevard Agua Mansa Road 1.07 4 MA 44-53 70% 50.7 45 45
34. RECHE CANYON
ROAD
Washington Street S. City Limit 2 2 MA 42-51 80% 50.5 45 45
35. RIVERSIDE AVENUE Agua Mansa Road Placentia Lane 1.35 4 MA 43-52 69% 54.4 50 50
36. RV CENTER DRIVE 600 E Washington
Street
1000 E
Washington Street
0.6 2 CO 21-30 82% 30.5 25 25
37. SAN BERNARDINO
AVE
N. Pepper Avenue Meridian Avenue 0.25 2 MA 33-42 87% 39.8 35 35
38. SAN BERNARDINO
AVENUE
N. Sycamore Avenue N. Pepper Avenue 0.74 2 MA 35-44 86% 43.2 40 40
39. VALLEY BOULEVARD W. City Limits N. Pepper Avenue 0.74 4 MA 39-48 74% 48.5 45 45
40. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Pepper Avenue N. Rancho Avenue 1.02 4 MA 41-50 82% 49.8 45 45
41. VALLEY BOULEVARD N. Rancho Avenue N. Mount Vernon
Avenue
1.27 4 MA 26-35 65% 37.5 35 35
42. WASHINGTON
STREET
West End S. Mount Vernon
Avenue
0.93 4 MA 28-37 82% 37.3 35 35
43. WASHINGTON
STREET
S. Mount Vernon
Avenue
Reche Canyon
Road
1.19 4 MA 36-45 85% 44.7 40 40
44. WASHINGTON
STREET
Reche Canyon Road Waterman Avenue 0.65 4 MA 33-42 78% 43.5 40 40 Notes:
(1) Classification Per City of Colton General Plan Mobility Element: MA= Major Arterial; SA= Secondary Arterial; CO= Collector
17.L
17 Results and Recommendations
The preliminary results of the Engineering and Traffic Survey reveal that the currently posted speed limits will not change and will remain as documented to allow for continued radar enforcement until the renewal of the posted speeds during the next validation of the Engineering and Traffic Survey.
Below are brief summaries presenting the justification for retaining the existing speed limits for various segments as part of this Engineering and Traffic Survey update for the City of Colton, including radar speed survey results, collision rates, review of existing conditions, and comments regarding evidence of any significant roadway and traffic factors not readily apparent to drivers.
Segment 1- Agua Mansa Road from S Riverside Avenue to S Rancho Avenue This section of Agua Mesa Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, industrial, and vacant land. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted in an 85th percentile speed limit of 49.2 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 41-50.
To ensure consistency with adjacent segment speed limits in the City of Rialto and given the presence of warehouses with truck traffic and curves that can potentially impact sight distances, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit is maintained per CVC Sections 22358.6 and 22358.8.
Segment 3- Barton Road from S La Cadena Drive to E City Limit This section of Barton Road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial, industrial, and vacant land. An uncontrolled crosswalk is located at S Terrace Avenue. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 47.9 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 39-48.
Due to the presence of uncontrolled crosswalk, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit is maintained per CVC Sections 22358.6 and 22358.8.
Segment 4- C Street from N Rancho Avenue to Colton Avenue This section of C Street is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are mainly residential.
Curbside parking is permitted on both sides of C Street. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 33.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 25-34. It is noted that the calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows higher value of 1.64 MVM compared to the expected 1.08 MVM, which when coupled with the residential land uses and the underpass makes the present speed limit more prudent than a higher speed. It is recommended that existing 30 mph speed limit be maintained per CVC Sections 22358.6 and 22358.8.
17.L
18 Segment 5- Colton Avenue from N City Limit to E Street** This section of road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 38.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 30-39. An Elementary school and a park are located within this segment. North side of this segment is under the jurisdiction of City of San Bernardino and is currently posted at 40 mph. In order to maintain consistency throughout Colton Road and due to the presence of school and park, it is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit is maintained.
Segment 6- Center Street from S Riverside Avenue to S City Limit This section of road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are mostly industrial or vacant. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 42.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 36-
45. South side of this segment is under the jurisdiction of City of Riverside, are currently posted at 40 mph. In order to maintain consistency, it is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit is maintained per CVC Sections 22358.6 and 22358.8.
Segment 7- Cooley Drive from E Colley Lane to Washington Street This section of road is a four-lane divided roadway with bike lanes on both sides. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph on this segment. An Elementary school is located within this segment. An uncontrolled crosswalk is located at E Old Ranch Road. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 38.6 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 28-37. With the presence of bike lane, an uncontrolled crosswalk and a school, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit is maintained per CVC Sections 22358.6 and 22358.8.
Segment 8- Cooley Drive from S Mt. Vernon Avenue to E Colley Lane This section of road is a two-lane divided roadway with bike lanes between E Colley Lane and north of E Via Venita and a four-lane divided roadway with bike lanes and curbside parking for the remining section till S Mt Vernon Avenue. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 38.3 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 34-43. The high collision rate as well as the presence of sharp horizontal curves, curbside parking, truck traffic and bicycle traffic makes the existing 35 mph the prudent speed limit.
Segment 9- Eucalyptus Avenue from W Randall Avenue to San Bernardino Ave This section of road is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 32.9 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 24-33. An Elementary
17.L
19 school and a middle school are located within this segment. Due to the presence of schools, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 30 mph speed limit is maintained.
Segment 10- Fairway Drive from N. Mount Vernon Avenue to Auto Plaza Drive This section of Fairway Drive is a two-lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential, and vacant land. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 40.9 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 30-39. The 10-mph pace range of 30 to 39 mph with 68% of vehicles indicates that a large majority of drivers driving below 85th percentile speed of 40.9 mph. It is also noted that the calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows much higher value of 3.09 MVM compared to the expected 1.08 MVM. It is recommended that existing speed 35 mph speed limit be maintained (CVC 22358.8) due to above reasons.
Segment 11- Hunts Lane from W Redland Blvd to Washington Street** This section of Fairway Drive is a four-lane roadway in shared jurisdiction with the City of San Bernardino. The adjacent land uses are residential, commercial. The existing speed limit on this segment per the City’s 2014 Engineering and Traffic Survey is 40 mph. However, the posted speed limit is 45 mph going northbound which to our understanding is in the City of San Bernardino. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of
44.4 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 32-41. It is recommended to maintain consistency between the two agencies. Given the higher than expected collision rates (over 10% of which are attributed to speeding), it is recommended speed limit of 40 mph be posted.
Segment 14- La Cadena Drive from Valley Blvd to BNSF Railroad Overpass This section of La Cadena Drive is mostly a four-lane undivided roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. An Elementary school is located within this segment and an uncontrolled pedestrian crosswalk at O Street. In addition, several commercial and residential driveways front La Cadena Drive. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 49.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 37- 46 mph with 58% of drivers within that pace. Due to the presence of driveways and several cross streets there is a potential for unexpected crossing, stopping, and turning vehicular traffic. With the school, crosswalk, and numerous driveways, it is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit be maintained.
Segment 15- La Cadena Drive from BNSF Railroad Overpass to S. City Limits This section of La Cadena Drive is mostly a four-lane roadway with a two-way left-turn lane. The adjacent land uses are commercial, industrial, and vacant land. This segment has an uncontrolled crosswalk at Fogg Street. The existing posted speed limit is 50 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 55.9 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 46 - 55mph. With 14% of the collisions attributed to speeding, and the presence of an
17.L
20 uncontrolled crosswalk and several driveways, it is recommended that existing 50 mph speed limit be maintained.
Segment 16- Laurel Street from Grand Avenue to Pennsylvania Avenue This section of road is a two-lane roadway. Curb-side parking is permitted along both sides of this segment. The adjacent land use is residential. A middle school is located within the segment. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 39.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 31-40. With a residential street typology, a higher-than-expected collision rate, and presence of a school, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit be maintained.
Segment 17- Laurel Street from Pennsylvania Avenue to N Mt Vernon Avenue** This section of road is a two-lane roadway. Curb-side parking is permitted along both sides of this segment. The adjacent land use is residential and commercial. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph with a 25 mph speed posted on both sides of the railroad underpass. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 38.1 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 27 - 36 with 79% of vehicles within this pace driving below the 85th percentile speed. With a higher-than-expected collision rate, the current pace, and the presence of numerous driveways, it is prudent to retain the existing 35 mph speed limit.
Segment 18- M Street from S La Cadena Drive to Mt Vernon Avenue This section of road is a two-lane roadway with curb-side parking permitted along both sides of this segment between La Cadena Drive and Fogg Street. The adjacent land uses are residential and commercial. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 43.5 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 32-41 with 72% indicating that a large majority of drivers driving the below 85th percentile speed. Given the above, and the presence of on-street parking, a higher-than-expected collision rate, and residential driveways a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit is maintained.
Segment 19- Meridian Avenue from W Randall Avenue to W Valley Blvd This section of Meridian Avenue is a two-lane roadway with a two-way left-turn lane with an uncontrolled crosswalk located at W Poema Drive intersection. Bike lanes are provided between San Bernardino Avenue and Valley Boulevard. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. An elementary school, a university medical center (California University of Science and Medicine center) and a hospital (Arrowhead Medical Center) is located within this segment.
The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 42.9 mph. It is recommended that speed limit remain 40 mph due to accommodate pedestrian and bicycle uses associated with the noted institutions along the roadway segment.
17.L
21 Segment 20- Mill Street from N Rancho Ave to BNSF Railroad Overpass This section of Mill Street is a two-lane undivided roadway with curbside parking permitted on both sides. The adjacent land uses are primarily residential and commercial with numerous driveways. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 42.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 34-43 mph. With the significantly higher-than-expected collision rate and the reduced sight distance on residential and commercial driveways associated with on-street parking, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be maintained.
Segment 21- Mt Vernon Avenue from Johnston St to E Citrus St/Grand Ave This section of road is a four-lane roadway with abutting residential and commercial uses. San Bernardino Valley College is located along this segment. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 28.3 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 20-29 mph. It is noted that the calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows higher value of 2.20 MVM compared to the expected 0.86 MVM. Due to higher collision rate and presence of a college, lower speed limit is prudent. it is recommended that the existing 25 mph speed limit be maintained.
Segment 22- Mount Vernon Avenue from E. Citrus Street/ Grant Avenue to E. Valley Boulevard This section of road is a four-lane roadway with two-way left-turn lane. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential with various pedestrian crossings along the corridor. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 46.1 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 32- 41. It is noted that the calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows higher value of 2.65 MVM as compared to the expected 0.86 MVM. The 10-mph pace range of 32 to 41 mph with 68% of vehicles indicates that a large majority of drivers driving below 85th percentile speed of 46.1 mph. Given the above vehicular and pedestrian considerations, it is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit be maintained.
Segment 23- Mt Vernon Avenue from E. Valley Boulevard to Cooley Drive This section of road is a two-lane roadway and gradual horizontal and vertical curves. The adjacent land uses are mostly commercial. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 39.3 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 29-38 mph. The 10-mph pace range of 29 to 38 mph with 77% of vehicles indicates that a large majority of drivers driving below 85th percentile speed of 39.3 mph. In addition, other considerations include horizontal curves (and associated sight distances), closely-spaced signalized intersections, and an undivided narrow roadway over the railroad grade crossing and storm channels. As such a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit be maintained.
Segment 24- Mt Vernon Avenue from Cooley Drive to E Washington Street
17.L
22 This section of road is a six-lane divided roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and vacant land. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 39.4 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 30-39 mph. With a higher-than-expected collision rate and 32% of collisions attributed to speeding, it is prudent to maintain the existing speed limit.
Segment 25- Citrus Street from Teresa Avenue to Rancho Avenue** This section of road is a four-lane roadway with curb-side parking permitted along both sides.
The adjacent land use is mostly residential, and the existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 35.1 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 27-36. The calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows much higher value of 4.26 MVM compared to the expected one 1.08 MVM with 25% of the collisions being speeding related. Besides, this segment has reduced sight distance concerns at residential driveways attributed on-street parking. As such, it is recommended that the existing 25 mph speed limit be maintained.
Segment 27- Olive Street from N. Rancho Avenue to N. La Cadena Avenue This section of road is a two-lane roadway with abutting residential uses. Ulysses Elementary School is located between N 2nd street and N Terrace Avenue on Olive Street. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 31.6 mph with a 10-mph pace range of 21-30 with 74% of drivers within that pace (below the 85th percentile speed). It is also noted that the calculated collision rate for the 4-year period shows much higher value of 4.49 MVM compared to the expected one 1.08 MVM. The recommended speed limit is 25 mph due to the presence of a school and high collision rates.
Segment 28- Pennsylvania Avenue from Mill Street to Valley Boulevard This section of road is a two-lane undivided roadway with curb-side parking along both sides.
The adjacent land uses are primarily residential and commercial, and the existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 37.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 27-36. With the higher-than-expected collision rate, 77% of vehicles within the 10-mph pace driving below the 85th percentile speed, and reduced sight distance on residential and commercial driveways caused by on-street parking, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit be maintained.
Segment 29- Pepper Avenue from Randall Avenue to W Valley Boulevard This section of Pepper Avenue is a three-lane roadway between Randall Avenue and San Bernardino Avenue and four-lane divided roadway between San Bernardino Avenue and W Valley Boulevard. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. A middle school (Jehue Middle School), a university medical center (California University of Science and Medicine center) and a hospital (Arrowhead Medical Center) are located within this segment. The existing
17.L
23 posted speed limit is 45 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 49.9 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 39-48. It is recommended that speed limit remain 45 mph due to the presence of the above noted institutions and a higher-than-expected collision rate.
Segment 30- Rancho Avenue from N City Limit to Mill Street This section of road is a four-lane roadway with curb-side parking permitted along both sides.
The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential, and the existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 43.5 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 34-43. With higher-than-expected collision rates coupled with reduced sight distance caused by on-street parking around the residential and commercial driveways, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit is maintained.
Segment 31- Rancho Avenue from Mill Street to W. Valley Boulevard** This section of road is a four-lane roadway with a posted bike route with abutting commercial and residential land uses. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 43.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 31-40. Colton High School is located on the east side and school stadium is located on the west side of Rancho Avenue between W Valley Boulevard and W E Street. Multiple uncontrolled pedestrian crossings exist along the corridor. With the high amount of pedestrian crossings/traffic, the higher-than-expected crash rates, and the presence of a school, it is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit be maintained.
Segment 32- Rancho Avenue from Agua Mansa Road to S La Cadena Drive This section of road is a four-lane roadway with adjacent commercial land uses. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 51.1 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 42-51. This segment has a higher-than-expected collision rate with 29% of the collisions attributed to speeding. It is recommended to maintain the existing 45 mph speed limit due to truck driveways along curve and to ensure consistency with the proposed speed zone on adjacent segment north of Agua Mansa Road.
Segment 33- Rancho Avenue from W Valley Boulevard to Agua Mansa Road This section of road is a four-lane roadway with a posted speed limit of 45 mph. The adjacent land uses are commercial, residential, and vacant land. The traffic and engineering survey resulted in an 85th percentile speed limit of 50.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 44-53.
However, it is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit be maintained due to the closely spaced signalized intersections, the classification as a Pedestrian Street north of N Street, the horizontal curvature, the truck traffic turning across center two way left turn median, and the higher than expected collision rate with 35% of collisions attributed to speeding.
17.L
24 Segment 34- Reche Canyon Road from Washington Street to S. City Limit This section of road is a two-lane roadway with adjacent residential and vacant land uses. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 50.5 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 42-51.
South side of this segment is under the jurisdiction of County of Riverside, and is currently posted at 45 mph. With 37% of the collisions attributed to speeding and in order to maintain consistency throughout Reche Canyon Road, it is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit be maintained.
Segment 35- Riverside Avenue from Agua Mansa Road to Placentia Lane This section of road is a four-lane roadway with a posted speed limit is 50 mph. The adjacent land uses are commercial and vacant land. The existing on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 54.4 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 43-52. South side of this segment is under the jurisdiction of County of Riverside, are currently posted at 50 mph. Moreover, the collision rates are higher than expected with 31% of crashes attributed to speeding. As such, it is recommended that existing 50 mph speed limit is maintained.
Segment 36- RV Center Dr from 600 E Washington St to 1000 E Washington St This section of road is a two-lane roadway with curbside parking permitted on both sides. The adjacent land uses are residential and commercial, and the existing posted speed limit is 25 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 30.5 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 21-30. With various RVs accessing the RV park and the horizontal curves, it is recommended that existing 25 mph speed limit be maintained.
Segment 37- San Bernardino Ave from N Pepper Avenue to Meridian Avenue This section of road has two through lanes and a two-way left-turn central lane. The adjacent land uses are residential and commercial. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph on this segment. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 39.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 33-42. However due to the presence a of two-way left-turn central lane, a vertical curve and hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is recommended. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit is maintained.
Segment 38- San Bernardino Ave from N Sycamore Ave to N. Pepper Avenue This section of road has four through lanes between Sycamore Avenue and Indigo Avenue and two through lanes between Indigo Avenue and Pepper Avenue. A bike lane is provided for westbound direction. The adjacent land uses are residential and vacant land, and the existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 43.2 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 35-44. With higher-than-expected collision
17.L
25 rates as well as the presence of bike travelers and multi-modal route typology, it is recommended that 35 mph speed limit be maintained.
Segment 39- Valley Boulevard from W City Limit to Pepper Avenue This section of road has four through lanes and a two-way left-turn central lane. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph. The adjacent land uses are commercial. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 48.3 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 39-48.
With heavy truck traffic turning across multiple lanes and higher-than-expected collision rates, it is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit be maintained.
Segment 40- Valley Boulevard from Pepper Avenue to Rancho Avenue This section of road consists of four through lanes and a two-way left-turn central lane. It has a posted speed limit of 45 mph and abuts commercial land uses. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 49.8 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 41-
50. With heavy truck traffic (due to the presence of a truck rental facility) and a two-way leftturn central lane there is a potential for unexpected crossing, stopping, and turning vehicular traffic. As a lower speed limit is prudent, it is recommended that existing 45 mph speed limit is maintained.
Segment 43- Washington Street from S Mt Vernon Ave to Reche Canyon Rd This section of road has four through lanes and one two-way left-turn central lane. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 44.7 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 36-45. With closely spaced signalized intersections, bicycle street designation, and a higher-than-expected collision rate, it is recommended that existing 40 mph speed limit be maintained.
Segment 44 - Washington Street from Reche Canyon Rd to S Waterman Ave This section of road is four-lane divided roadway. The adjacent land uses are commercial and residential. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The traffic and engineering survey resulted with an 85th percentile speed limit of 43.5 mph and a 10-mph pace range of 33-42. The 10-mph pace range of 33 to 42 mph with 78% of vehicles indicates that a large majority of drivers driving below 85th percentile speed of 43.5 mph. Due to above as well as closely-spaced signalized intersections and the consistency with adjacent posted speed limit zones, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that existing 35 mph speed limit is maintained. .
17.L
Appendix A: Speed Survey Summary Sheets
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Agua Mansa Road
1 S. Riverside Avenue - S. Rancho Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions
2.3 2 Lane (Urban)
25 - 75 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Signals at Riverside Avenue and Rancho Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
9002
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 87%
1.08 15
3.75 0.50
4 27%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 12:43 P.M.
104
41 - 50
45.7 49.2
45 consistency with adjacent City of Rialto; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Barton Road
2 Washington Street- S. City Limits
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions
0.44 2 Lane (Urban)
32 - 75 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at Washington Street
2- Traffic Volumes
16352
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 78%
1.08 15
3.75 1.43
7 47%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 10:06 A.M.
102
43-52
47.2 51.4
50 closest to the 85th percentile speed
50 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Barton Road
3 S. La Cadena Drive - E City Limits
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions
0.22 2 Lane (Urban)
25 - 58 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at S. La Cadena Drive
2- Traffic Volumes
9519
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 67%
1.08 2
0.50 0.65
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 9:02 A.M.
106
39-48
42.4 47.9
45 consistency with adjacent City of Rialto; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
"C" Street
4 N. Rancho Avenue - Colton Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions
1.1 2 Lane (Urban)
40 - 65 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Signals at N. Rancho Avenue and Stop at Colton
Avenue, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th and Pennsylvania
Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
4923
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 75%
1.08 13
3.25 1.64
2 15%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Thur 3/10/2022 9:58 A.M.
106
25-34
29.2 33.7
30 consistency with adjacent City of Rialto; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain
previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
30 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Colton Avenue
5 N. City Limit - E. "E" Street
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions
0.93 2 Lane (Urban)
42 - 50 Feet
2 Undivided
2 Signals at Mount Vernon Avenue and N. Fairview Avenue; 3 Stops at E. "E" Street, E. "C" Street and Coburn Street 2- Traffic Volumes
7688
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 92%
1.08 11
2.75 1.05
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/1/2022 10:12 A.M.
103
30-39
35.5 38.8
35 Presence of school and park; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Center Street
6 S. Riverside Avenue- S. City Limits
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions
0.75 2 Lane (Urban)
24 - 44 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Stop at S. Riverside Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
5124
2/24/2022
3-Collision History
4 74%
1.08 0
0.00 0.00
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 1:55 P.M.
101
36-45
38.2 42.8
40 Consistency with adjacent jurisdiction; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Cooley Drive
7 E. Cooley Lane - Washington Street
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions
0.5 4L/Divided (Urban)
80 - 93 Feet
4 Divided
1 Signal at E. Washington Street and 2 Stops at Ashwood lane and E. Cooley Lane
2- Traffic Volumes
9076
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 77%
1.33 13
3.25 1.96
3 23%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 11:04 A.M.
104
28-37
33.4 38.6
35 presence of bike lane, an uncontrolled crosswalk and a school; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Cooley Drive
8 S. Mount Vernon Avenue - E. Cooley Lane
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions
1.5 4L/Divided (Urban)
94 - 118 Feet
4 Divided
1 Signal at Mount Vernon Avenue and 1 Stop at E.
Cooley Lane
2- Traffic Volumes
7163
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 71%
1.33 25
6.25 1.59
7 28%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 1:15 P.M.
103
34-43
38.3 44
40 high collision rate; bike lanes and truck traffic; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain
previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
29.2 32.9
30 middle and elementary school; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit
per CVC 22358.8.
30 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
84%
1.08 11
2.75 4.79
1 9%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 12:46 P.M.
101
24-33
2 Lane (Urban)
47 Feet
2 Undivided
4 Stops at Randall Avenue, Admiralty Street, De
Carmen Drive and San Bernardino Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
3146
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Eucalyptus Avenue
9 W. Randall Avenue- San Bernardino Avenue
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions
0.5
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
35.8 40.9
35 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
68%
1.08 30
7.50 3.09
4 13%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/1/2022 9:10 A.M.
100
30-39
2 Lane (Urban)
30 - 60 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at Mount Vernon Avenue; 2 Stops at Sperry Drive and Auto Plaza Drive
2- Traffic Volumes
8307
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Secondary Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Fairway Drive
10 N. Mount Vernon Avenue- Auto Plaza Drive
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions
0.8
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
37.3 44.4
40 high collision rate; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
40 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
51%
0.86 20
5.00 1.56
3 15%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 12:05 P.M.
101
32-41
4L/Undivided (Urban)
62 - 68 Feet
4 Undivided
4 Signals at Redlands Boulevard, Oliver Holmes Road, E.
Cooley Lane and Washington Street.
2- Traffic Volumes
9745
2/15/2022
3-Collision History
4 Secondary Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Hunts Lane
11 W. Redlands Boulevard - Washington Street
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions
0.9
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
33.7 37.2
35 Closest to the 85th percentile speed
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
89%
1.33 9
2.25 2.59
1 11%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/1/2022 11:05 A.M.
101
29-38
4L/Divided (Urban)
75-86 Feet
4 Divided
2 Signals at Mount Vernon Avenue and Bordwell Avenue; 1 Stop at 8th Street
2- Traffic Volumes
3966
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
La Cadena Drive
12 N. Mount Vernon Avenue - N. 8th Street
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions
0.6
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
31.4 35.5
35 closest to the 85th percentile speed
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
82%
1.08 37
9.25 8.60
3 8%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Thur 3/10/2022 11:10 A.M.
103
28-37
2 Lane (Urban)
50 - 62 Feet
2 Undivided
5 Signals at Olive Street, C Street, G Street, H Street and Valley Boulevard; 2 Stops at E Street and F Street
2- Traffic Volumes
3274
2/22/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
La Cadena Drive
13 N. 8th Street - Valley Boulevard
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions
0.9
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
44.1 49.8
45 School and uncontrolled pedestrian crosswalk; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain
previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
45 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
58%
0.86 26
6.50 1.35
3 12%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Wed 3/2/2022 10:15 A.M.
108
37-46
4L/Undivided (Urban)
38 - 78 Feet
4 Undivided
3 Signals at Valley Boulevard, N Street and Maple
Street
2- Traffic Volumes
16483
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
La Cadena Drive
14 Valley Boulevard - BNSF Railroad Overpass
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions
0.8
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
49.6 55.9
50 uncontrolled pedestrian crosswalk; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
50 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
74%
1.33 28
7.00 0.40
4 14%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/8/2022 9:43 A.M.
105
46-55
4L/Divided (Urban)
60 - 100 Feet
4 Divided
1 Signal at Barton Road; 1 Stop at Lowa Street
2- Traffic Volumes
21930
2/23/2022
3-Collision History
4 Major Arterial
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
La Cadena Drive
15 BNSF Railroad Overpass - S. City Limits
NB/SB
1- Roadway Conditions
2.2
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
35.2 39.7
35 middle school; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC 22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
80%
1.08 6
1.50 2.14
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/1/2022 2:16 P.M.
100
31-40
2 Lane (Urban)
40 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at Rancho Avenue; 2 Stops at Grand Avenue and
Norman Road
2- Traffic Volumes
3196
3/2/2022
3-Collision History
4 Grand Avenue - Pennsylvania Avenue
Collector
1- Roadway Conditions
0.6 EB/WB
16 City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Laurel Street
17.L
City
Street
Segment Number
Segment Location
Direction
Segment Length (miles)
Street Classification
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Roadway Division
Traffic Controlled Intersections
Average Daily Traffic (veh/day)
Traffic Volume Count Date(s)
Number of Years Considered (1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020)
Highway/Roadway Type
Expected Annual Collision Rate (MVM)
Number of Collisions (4-year Period)
Average Annual Collisions
Calculated Annual Collision Rate (Collision/MVM)
Collision by Speeding
% Collision by Speeding
Speed Survey Date and Time
Number of Survey Samples
10-mi Pace (mph)
Percentage of vehicles in 10-mi Pace
50th Percentile (mph)
85th Percentile (mph)
Posted Speed Limit (mph)
Speed Limit Justification
Recommended Speed Limit (mph)
Certification:
Date
33.2 38.1
35 high collision rate; rounded to lowest 5 mph per CVC Sections 22358.6; retain previous speed limit per CVC
22358.8.
35 I, Rawad Hani, do hereby certify that I am a Registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. I have conducted this study for the City of Colton, and this report was prepared under my supervision. Its contents are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
RCE #83730
Rawad Hani State Registration No.
79%
1.08 11
2.75 2.72
0 0%
4- Speed Zoning Analysis
Tue 3/1/2022 1:15 P.M.
101
27-36
2 Lane (Urban)
40 Feet
2 Undivided
1 Signal at N. La Cadena Drive; 1 Stop at Pennsylvania
Avenue
2- Traffic Volumes
3651
3/2/2022
3-Collision History
4 Collector
City of Colton
Speed Zone Summary Report
Colton
Laurel Street
17 Pennsylvania Avenue - N. Mount Vernon Avenue
EB/WB
1- Roadway Conditions
0.76