Hemet City Council
January 10, 2023

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | 7
Record of Success
We are confident that you will be pleased with what our clients have to say about us. Below is the list of some of our current On-Call references. Due to the page limit we have included the full list of clients for the last five years in the Appendix. TJKM is under several multi-year or longer-term contracts with agencies that utilize our services to increase their bandwidth, including:

Agencies & References Duties/Responsibilities
City of Palo Alto | 2013-Ongoing
Ms. Shahla Yazdy
(650) 617-3151
[email protected]
 Transportation
Engineering Design
 Traffic Engineering
 Multimodal Studies
 Staff Augmentation
 Peer Review
 Outreach
 Traffic Calming
Studies
 Programming &
Grant Application
 Traffic Impact
Studies
City of San Bruno | 2015-Ongoing
Mr. David Wong
(650) 616-7157
[email protected]
 Engineering &
Traffic Surveys
 Transportation
Planning
 Transportation
Impact Fee
 Transportation
Engineering Design
 Traffic Safety
Studies
 Safety Study
 Staff Augmentation
Town of Los Gatos | 2003-Ongoing
Mr. Matt Morley
(408) 399-5774
[email protected]
 Transportation
Engineering Design
 Peer Review
 Public Meetings
 Safety Analyses
 Signal Coordination
 Traffic Impact Studies
 Traffic Engineering
 Traffic Analysis
 Staff Augmentation
City of Millbrae | 2017-Ongoing
Mr. Andrew Yang
(650) 259-2393
[email protected]
 Traffic Engineering
 Safety Analysis
 Traffic Studies
 ITS
 Transportation
Engineering Design
 Pedestrian & Bicycle
Planning & Design
 Grant Application
Support
 Multimodal
Planning
City of Concord | 2015-Ongoing
Mr. Abhishek Parikh
(925) 671-3129
[email protected]
 Traffic Design
 Cost Estimate
 Web Design
 Develop Concept
Plans
 HSIP Application
 Staff Augmentation
 Ped & Bike Studies
 Safety Studies
 Transportation
Planning
City of Pittsburg | 2016-Ongoing
Mr. Nhat Phan
(925) 252-4857
[email protected]
 Traffic Studies
 Transportation
Engineering Design
 Peer Review
 Traffic Impact Studies
 Systemic Safety
Analysis Report
 Programming &
Grant Application
 Signal Coordination
 Public Meetings
City of Oakley | 2015-Ongoing
Mr. Kevin Rohani
(925) 625-7003
[email protected]
 Traffic Engineering
 Transportation
Engineering Design
 Parking Studies
 Public Meetings
 Traffic Impact Studies
 Programming &
Grant Application
 Peer Review
City of Belmont | 2010-Ongoing
Ms. Bozhena Palatnik
(650) 595-7463
[email protected]
 Traffic Studies
 Transportation
Engineering Design
 Peer Review
 Public Meetings
 Traffic Impact Studies
 Complete Street
Design & Feasibility
Studies
 Programming &
Grant Application
 Safety Studies
 Signal Coordination
Contra Costa County | 2019-
Ongoing
Ms. Mary Halle
(925) 313-2327
[email protected]
 Signal Coordination
& Operations Study
 HSIP Applications

17.M

Understanding & Approach

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | 8

UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
Approach
Our general approach for any task order, assigned to the TJKM Team as part of the On-Call Contract is summarized below. Successful completion of task orders requires three elements that our team provides special emphasis on:
 Proactive project management in close coordination with the client's staff;  Thorough understanding of regulatory requirements, coupled with informal agency consultation early in the project to ascertain specific permitting permutations, and agency attitudes; and  Careful and continuous assessment of the schedule so that tasks in the critical path are completed at the appropriate point in the project.

Our experience indicates that projects are most successful when clients and regulatory agencies coordinate closely when preparing a project description and while establishing the appropriate scope for and timing of technical studies. Our role as assisting with the City of Hemet on traffic engineering and analysis projects will be to focus on providing support and coordination to successfully fulfill technical studies, including sound scope development and schedule requirements. This approach relies upon strong leadership by Mr. Fakhry, Mr. Doty, and the Task Leads, who are thoroughly familiar with regulations pertinent to each discipline, with the understanding that permitting requirements often drive the project schedule. Understanding the project’s critical path enables Mr. Fakhry to focus technical efforts, thereby maintaining cost efficiency and overall schedule.

The TJKM approach to successful completion of each task relies on a careful assessment of the likely technical and regulatory requirements of the project, and formulation of the appropriate team for the task. The size and structure of the task is tailored to meet the project schedule, and is designed to be of sufficient depth to provide flexibility with the flow of project demands. For each task order, Mr.

Fakhry will consult with the City Project Manager to develop an appropriate scope and staffing matrix for each task. At that point, a detailed work plan will be established in consultation with the City, and the schedule adjusted as necessary to meet the needs of the task through intensification of efforts in specific areas.

Our role for this contract is to assist the City in delivering top quality projects. To accomplish this objective, the TJKM Team assigned to a specific task or technical study will work closely with Mr. Doty and Mr. Fakhry and, as needed, the City of Hemet’s Project Manager as well as planning and engineering staff, to identify important issues and develop an effective approach for addressing those issues. Close teamwork between City staff and our technical team will enable issues of public and agency concern to be evaluated to an appropriate level of detail. For each assignment, our general approach is as follows:
 Initiation of Work Assignments – The City of Hemet’s Project Manager will notify Mr. Fakhry of a proposed or possible task assignment. Based on the type of work involved, he will identify one or more choices of team for the assignment, and provide these recommendations to the City. Mr.

Fakhry will be available to meet with the City of Hemet’s Project Manager, to discuss the team for the assignment and make necessary changes based on the input received.

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | 9
 Preparation of Work Plans and Initiation of Task Orders – The City’s task order will provide the proposed study objectives and expectations, including any specialized needs and schedule requirements. TJKM will work with the City of Hemet’s Project Manager to confirm the requirements, and refine or clarify assumptions or expectations, including needed information from the City. TJKM will coordinate with the City to achieve approval of the task order, and no work will proceed until the task order is signed and a notice to proceed is issued. As appropriate, a work plan will be developed at the initiation of the task order, or the task order itself will function as the work plan. A project schedule will be developed that identifies key milestones, including delivery dates, and incorporation of City review times, and if applicable other regulatory agency review periods.
 Monitoring Progress of Assignment – Objective-based performance monitoring is a highly visible activity on our projects. The budget and schedule for tasks identified in the Work Plan for each task order will be entered into our in-house, accounting system that allows both Mr. Fakhry and the Task Leads to monitor budget and schedule performance. Coordination may include scheduled technical briefings with City staff. Progress reports for each assignment under this contract will be prepared monthly.
 Deliverables – As assigned deliverables are prepared, they will receive an independent, documented technical and peer review by qualified in-house staff. Following the peer review, documents will be provided to the City for review. The City of Hemet’s comments will be addressed and incorporated into the draft deliverable(s). TJKM uses comment matrices to list each comment and how and where it was addressed. These comment matrices provide an additional documentation of the QA/QC process. As appropriate, documents will be provided in paper and electronic formats in accordance with the contract/task order.  Cost Control - Control of project costs will be accomplished by monitoring on a task level basis.

This detailed task level will roll up into milestone summaries and a project summary. Our cost accounting system is a "live" database that the project manager can access to determine the financial status of the project at any time. Cost control reporting to TJKM’s Project Manager will be implemented through the invoicing process. Progress reports will also be included to relay information on project progress and critical issues.
 Schedule Control - Establishing a schedule that meets the project objectives is relatively easy.

Maintaining this schedule during changing project priorities, unforeseen conditions, public consensus building, etc., is a challenge. The project work scope will be broken down by function and separated into defined tasks. Tasks will be linked logically and will be sufficiently detailed to allow for realistic representation of the project. Project progress will also be monitored by percent complete for each task.

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | 10
Familiarity with City, County & State Procedures
TJKM has completed numerous projects that have followed State and Federal procedures and processes. Some of these projects included state and federal Active Transportation Program (ATP) funds, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ), Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and
Section 130 funding. All of these projects required coordination with Caltrans Local Assistance Program for E-76 permit approval.

The level of TJKM’s involvement has varied depending on the client. On some of these projects, TJKM has assisted the local agency with the completion of the Request for Authorization (RFA) to Proceed package to Caltrans Local Assistance for Preliminary Engineering, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) clearance, and E-76 permit authorization for construction funds. We are familiar with the processes used to satisfy a variety of funding sources, and will draw upon our background and extensive experience to satisfy all City, State and Federal procedures, and processes.

Understanding of the City’s Needs

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEYS
TJKM has conducted numerous Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) for municipal agencies in over 50 jurisdictions throughout the State of California. Each study segments in all of these projects were carefully reviewed to meet the requirements of California state laws for speed zones and radar enforcement. Past study recommendations have been adopted by our municipal clients keeping them in compliance with state law and improving traffic safety in their communities.

In order to better conform to the standards established in the Federal Highway Administration’s MUTCD, and to address some of the widespread disregard of the five mile per hour (mph) special downward speed zoning provision, the California MUTCD revised the speed zoning section to require rounding the 85th percentile to the nearest five mph increment rather than the lower five mph increment.

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | 11

SIGNAL & STOP WARRANTS ANALYSIS
TJKM likely has prepared more traffic signal designs than any firm in Northern California because of our large staff devoted to this practice and having prepared signal designs during our entire 48-year history. TJKM looks forward to bringing that knowledge and experience to the City of Hemet. TJKM was also one of three Bay Area firms selected by the MTC to re-time traffic signals. We have completed signal retiming for over 100 signalized intersections annually for the past decade.

TJKM has timed approximately 1500+ intersections throughout the State of California. Our proposed team members have worked on signal coordination projects under the MTC Regional Signal Timing Program 2008-2010 Cycles and PASS 2010-2022 Cycles. In addition, we have provided traffic signal timing evaluation and signal timing plans for numerous local jurisdictions within the State. Many of our traffic signal system projects have included coordination of existing signals, development of new timing plans, implementation, and fine tuning, including interconnect design for some projects. Our staff are thoroughly familiar with all of the necessary software programs (HCS, Synchro, VISSIM, VISTRO, SIDRA, Traffix, TransModeler, FREQ, and CORSIM) associated with different types of controllers (Econolite, Type 170’s, 2070L, 2070’s, NEMA TS2, Eagle, ASC-2, Transyt, and Cobalt) that are utilized by different agencies. We also have experience in legacy software systems such as Transyt-7F for transitioning archived projects to new efforts. We are also adept with TransCad, VISSUM, and CUBE for travel demand modeling.

TJKM staff also has in-depth expertise in the development and calibration of the types of signal coordination plans available to improve transportation management systems: time-of-day, traffic responsive, and traffic adaptive signal coordination routines. TJKM will assist City’s traffic signal maintenance staff to implement signal timings and troubleshoot issues within traffic signal communications systems or with the central system software. We have worked with signal maintenance crew for many cities implementing and assisting them with their signal timing changes and adjustments.

Intelligent Transportation Systems – Our Team is recognized worldwide for transportation planning and design capabilities and we have worked with many agencies to improve the efficiency of surface transportation systems through the planning, design, operation, and maintenance of ITS. Our Team members have gained significant experience in the design and development of ITS systems during the last nine years. Through our work, we have developed a process that provides efficient ITS design through a multi-leveled approach, which addresses each element from concept and communications technology to implementation. Our Team members have successfully applied this approach to several similar projects throughout the nation, tailoring each project to our client’s needs. On our ITS design projects, we inventory existing conditions, develop base maps and prepare PS&E for traffic signals at 35%, 60%, 90%, and Final.

TJKM has performed numerous traffic signal warrants, two-way and four way stop warrants over the years using Caltrans Traffic Manuel and California MUTCD and has prepared warrant studies as part of Traffic Impact Studies and Safety Analysis. Other warrants we prepared include left turn needs, exclusive right turn lane warrants, pedestrian HAWK warrant, and lighted crosswalks warrant.

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | 12

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
The TJKM Team has all the requisite technical experience that is required to complete any project successfully. Our team members have extensive knowledge and experience of traffic signal coordination, implementation and fine-tuning, traffic studies, intersection levels of service, freeway, and arterial operational studies, PS&E for signals and as-built plans, neighborhood and circulation plan studies, data collection, traffic handling plans, pedestrian and bicycle studies, traffic safety analysis, operational analysis, and signing and striping.

PLAN CHECKING SERVICES
TJKM regularly performs plan checks. The purpose of these reviews is to assist agencies in the public sectors and companies within the private sectors, in making major land use and other development decisions. We have performed this service for both public and private sector clients throughout the State of California.

REVIEW OF GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ITEMS
With our extensive experience in traffic planning, operations, and design, TJKM is well suited to provide support to peer review items developed by other consultants in the realm of traffic engineering. Under this task, TJKM will peer review striping and geometric improvement plans, development
related to traffic impact analysis (including Level of Service and VMT), and transportation section of an Environmental Impact Report. The purpose of these reviews is to assist agencies in the public sectors and companies within the private sectors, in making major land use and other development decisions. We have performed this service for both public and private sector clients throughout the State of California.

COMMUNITY SUPPORT
TJKM has a combined total experience in this area of about 70 years, including involvement in many meetings, hearings, and workshops involving substantial areas of conflict among the participants. We are very comfortable in this setting and value a diversity of views by promoting public engagement and feedback. TJKM specializes in a variety of community outreach methods and strategies to assist our plans and clients, including public workshops, focus groups, hosting walking/biking tours, development of project websites for announcements and to elicit feedback, and intercept and online surveys. Our team will utilize unique insights from our past experience to proactively identify and address potential concerns. Building on those prior lessons learned, we will work closely with stakeholders to develop alternatives that meet safety and mobility goals while also supporting a community-building approach.

17.M

Quality Assurance

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | 13

QUALITY ASSURANCE

QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES
TJKM’s Quality Assurance Procedures are utilized throughout the life of the Project. Quality Control starts at the proposal and scope definition stage and continues through the completion of all assignments. To assure that errors, omissions and ambiguities in submittals and drawings are limited to an absolute minimum, the responsibilities for technical review, peer review/coordination checking, and technical audit functions are assigned to the appropriate TJKM Team members. TJKM’s approach integrates the work of our subconsultants into the quality control system through the use of established procedures and our peer review/independent checking capability augmented with technical audits.

QUALITY CONTROL
TJKM’s Quality Control Program provides quality services and products that meet or exceed the expectations of our clients. Quality Control is an integral part of TJKM’s entire professional service process, which is integrated into our work plan. The formal Quality Control Reviews consist of "Quality Assurance and Quality Control Manager" and "Project Manager and Project Engineer Reviews". All formal Quality Control Reviews will result in comments recorded on Comment Sheets. TJKM’s established Quality Control Plan ensures that TJKM will receive thorough and accurate design documents and reports that are prepared in formats consistent with local agency and Caltrans guidelines. Our Project Manager has responsibility for implementation of the Quality Control Plan.

17.M

Exceptions &/or Other Relevant Information

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | 14

EXCEPTIONS &/OR OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION
TJKM has reviewed the sample agreement for consulting services and is willing to accept the terms and conditions set forth in the agreement.

17.M

Cost Approach

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | 15

COST APPROACH
Control of project costs will be accomplished by monitoring on a task level basis. This detailed task level will roll up into milestone summaries and a project summary. Our cost accounting system is a "live" database that the project manager can access to determine the financial status of the project at any time. Cost control reporting to TJKM’s Project Manager will be implemented through the invoicing process. Progress reports will also be included to relay information on project progress and critical issues. TJKM has a proven record of meeting schedules on time and working with the client if issues arise to ensure a successful project.

Below we have included our Hourly Rates.

RATE SCHEDULE
Principal ....................................................................................................................................................$250/hour Director.....................................................................................................................................................$230/hour Senior Project Manager.......................................................................................................................$210/hour Project Manager ....................................................................................................................................$180/hour Senior Transportation Engineer........................................................................................................$165/hour Transportation Engineer......................................................................................................................$145/hour Assistant Transportation Engineer ...................................................................................................$125/hour Senior Transportation Planner...........................................................................................................$125/hour Transportation Planner ........................................................................................................................$120/hour Assistant Transportation Planner......................................................................................................$115/hour Graphics Designer.................................................................................................................................$110/hour Designer ...................................................................................................................................................$100/hour Technical Staff II........................................................................................................................................$90/hour Administration Staff ................................................................................................................................$80/hour Production Staff........................................................................................................................................$55/hour Reimbursable Expenses
Plotting (per sheet)…………. ..................................................................................................................…...$18.00 Travel Cost (per mile, subject to change; based on IRS standard mileage rates) ................. $0.625 All outside services are billed at cost plus a ten percent margin for handling.

Expert Witness charges available upon request.

Rates Effective January 1, 2022
Rates Subject to Change

17.M

Appendices

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | A
Appendix A
Client List

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | A1

TJKM PROJECT LIST
TJKM averages 240 projects per year. Over the past five years, we have completed more than 1,000 projects that vary from traffic engineering to intelligent transportation systems and multimodal improvements. To provide Broward County with an idea of the variety of work we completed, here is a list of our ongoing and completed projects since 2016. If the County would like more information about any project, we will be happy to provide this upon request. Unless noted otherwise, all jurisdictions are in California.

Name Jurisdiction Start
Date
Name Jurisdiction Start
Date
W. SACRAMENTO TRAFFIC

INVESTIGATION
West
Sacramento
11/29/2021 MADERA CTC ON-CALL Madera
County
10/22/2018
1550 N VASCO ROAD STARBUCKS

TRAFFIC STUDY
El Cerrito 11/23/2021 BALMORE COURT RESIDENTIAL

TRAFFIC STUDY
Contra Costa
County
10/20/2018
NAPA LRSP Napa 11/23/2021 SR2S NEIGHBORHOOD TRAF SFTY 1-6 LOC
Oakland 10/18/2018
SMPs 39 and 40 TIS Livermore 11/16/2021 1835 SAN PABLO AVENUE TIS Berkeley 10/18/2018

FAIRFIELD COMMERCIAL PROJECT
DR2021-015
Fairfield 11/9/2021 TRACY HILLS TRAFFIC STUDY Tracy 10/17/2018 WILLIAMS LRSP Williams 11/9/2021 BALLATERRA TDM PEER REVIEW Los Gatos 10/16/2018 10409 STARBUCKS TRAFFIC STUDY El Cerrito 11/8/2021 STANTON SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS Alameda County
10/15/2018
SP III Update San Joaquin
County
11/3/2021 760 SAN PABLO PARKING STUDY Pinole 10/11/2018 BART NTRC LINK 21 TRAVEL DEMAND

MODELING
BART 11/1/2021 RAIL PROJECT MANAGEMENT

SERVICES
Palo Alto 10/5/2018
EV CHARGING STATION PLANS NVTA 10/25/2021 CHALK HILL ROAD BRIDGE

REPLACEMENT
Sonoma
County
10/5/2018
4549 INGRAM CREEK ROAD TIS Stanislaus
County
10/21/2021 1798 TIMOTHY CANNABIS TRIP

GENERATION
San Leandro 10/4/2018
CORDES - PROMONTORY EXTENSIONTS_SSTracy 10/21/2021 REPUBLIC AVE CANNABIS TRIP

GENERATION
San Leandro 10/4/2018
612 MAIN STREET TRIP GENERATION Milpitas 10/15/2021 BUNCHE DR AT BOSCELL TSM-SS Fremont 10/2/2018 PITTSBURG LRSP Pittsburg 10/7/2021 DEANZA BLVD FROM TEIXEIRA TO

ISIDORO
San Joaquin
County
10/1/2018
HWY 225 BIKE PATH ST. LIGHTING
DESIGN
Humboldt
County
10/7/2021 DUBLIN TRANSIT CENTER GARAGE Dublin 10/1/2018

EL CAPITAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

CROSSWALK
Madera
County
10/7/2021 RHEEM BLVD STOP WARRANT Moraga 9/28/2018

CONCORD SIGNAL HARDWARE
UPGRADES PHASE 2
Concord 10/5/2021 O'Brien Heavy Haul Traffic Study Contra Costa County
9/26/2018
VILLAREAL INVESTIGATION Fresno
County
10/5/2021 OAKLEY MEDICAL DENTAL COMPLEX Oakley 9/26/2018 SOLANO COUNTY LRSP Solano
County
10/4/2021 DUMBARTON QUARRY & PARK
ACCESS
Fremont 9/25/2018
1525 PINE STREET REPORT San
Francisco
9/28/2021 PIEDMONT DAY CARE CENTER San Jose 9/21/2018
1155 & 1185 TERRA BELLA AVENUE
MTA
Mountain
View
9/21/2021 I 680 EXPRESS LANES ALAMEDA CTC Alameda
County
9/21/2018
463 AND 560 HONEY LANE TRAFFIC
STUDY
Oakley 9/17/2021 BELALCAZAR V. CITY OF SAN CARLOS San Carlos 9/21/2018 2411 BROADWAY ST. TIS Eureka 9/16/2021 MUSTANG WAY AT GREAT PARKWAY TSM
San Joaquin
County
9/20/2018

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | A2
UCAI 888 TENNESSEE AVE STUDY San
Francisco
9/14/2021 7190 BRADSHAW ROAD TIS Sacramento
County
9/19/2018
TEMPORARY SIGNALS GIBSON ROAD Woodland 9/14/2021 SHEA SIGNAL WARRANTS San Joaquin County
9/14/2018
LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TX Lower Rio
Grande
Valley, TX
9/14/2021 PLANNING & DESIGN METRO LINE 2A
& 7
India 9/12/2018

WOLFE RD - PAVEMENT REHAB -

ELECTRICAL
Sunnyvale 9/13/2021 4050 FLORIN SIG MOD Sacramento 9/10/2018 ARNAUDO BLVD @ PROVIDENCE ST
TSM
San Joaquin
County
9/10/2021 STARBUCKS ZINFANDEL 50 TRAFFIC
STUDY
Rancho
Cordova
9/10/2018
STARBUCKS TRAFFIC STUDY Concord 9/9/2021 CANNABIS CULTIVATION FACILITY TIS Alameda County
9/7/2018

FRANKLIN BEACHWOOD

INTERCONNECTIVITY
Merced
County
9/7/2021 JACKSON-WEBSTER PARKING STUDY Fairfield 9/6/2018 TRACY HILLS PHASE 2 TS Tracy 9/3/2021 ROADWAY SAFETY SIGNING AUDIT Tuolumne County
9/4/2018
AVE 280 WIDENING - SEGMENT 2 Tulare
County
9/2/2021 SEQUOIA GATEWAY SIGNAL PS&E Visalia 9/4/2018
STARBUCKS TIS Eureka 9/1/2021 2017 TAM SYS MONITORING/2019

CMP UPDATE
Marin County 9/1/2018
CHUKCHANSI V. BROWN Madera 9/1/2021 1401 ILLINOIS STREET

TRANSPORTATION STUDY
San Francisco 8/31/2018
PARDEE DAM ROAD STUDY EBMUD 8/31/2021 BOCANEGRA VS. CURACH Monterey County
8/31/2018

DESIGN OF HILL QUARRY ROADS
A18573-3
Brisbane 8/25/2021 GRANT LINE ROAD AT MT. HOUSE

PARKWAY TSM
San Joaquin
County
8/28/2018
2364 ROAD 20, SAN PABLO San Pablo 8/24/2021 NINTH ST PAVEMENT REHAB

PROJECT
Stanislaus
County
8/23/2018
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ON-CALL San Joaquin
County
8/19/2021 HACIENDA MONUMENT STRUCTURE

SIG COST EST
Pleasanton 8/16/2018
2021 SAN JOSE ON-CALL San Jose 8/16/2021 SANTA FE & TULARE ROUNDABOUT Visalia 8/15/2018 SR 156 MULTI-MODAL

ENHANCEMENTS STUDY
San Benito
County
8/12/2021 NEIGHBORHOODS A&B SS PLANS San Joaquin
County
8/15/2018

CONFIDENTIAL PROJECT NEAR

WINDSOR
Sonoma
County
8/12/2021 GRANT LINE RD AT TRADITION ST IN
MHCSD
San Joaquin
County
8/15/2018

SAN BRUNO LOCAL ROAD SAFETY
PLAN
San Bruno 8/10/2021 IPC 14 IRON HORSE AT HOOD & DW

TS-TSM-SS
Tracy 8/14/2018

ALHAMBRA PED COUNTDOWN HEAD

INSTALL
Alhambra 8/9/2021 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR RETAIL

DISPENSARY
Santa Rosa 8/13/2018
VISALIA SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Visalia 8/6/2021 TERRACES PROJECT TRAFFIC STUDY Lafayette 8/8/2018 RED TAIL FAIRFIELD TRAFFIC STUDY Fairfield 8/6/2021 1477 ECR Residential Belmont 8/8/2018 SOUTH EAST TEXAS RCTP South East,
TX RPC
8/6/2021 SOUTHTOWN COMMONS SITE
ACCESS
Vacaville 8/8/2018

COMMS MASTER PLAN - FINAL

REVISIONS
San Joaquin
County
7/30/2021 STANFORD MEDICAL TRAFFIC STUDY Alameda
County
8/7/2018
CORDES- PHASE 1L-TS-SS-SIC Tracy 7/29/2021 ALADDIN AVE AT ALVARADO ST TSM San Leandro 8/7/2018 SSF SAFEWAY TDM South San
Francisco
7/22/2021 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS Livermore 8/7/2018

SATELLITE HEALTHCARE PARKING
STUDY
Manteca 7/19/2021 JENSEN LANE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Windsor 8/7/2018

TOWN-WIDE TRAFFIC SPEED SURVEY
(E&TS)
Moraga 7/19/2021 VALLE VISTA AT MISSION TSM Hayward 8/6/2018

ON-CALL TRANSPORTATION ENG

SERVICES
Modesto 7/13/2021 CITY OF SAN JOSE ON-CALL San Jose 8/1/2018 TASSAJARA GAP CLOSURE SIC-SL Dublin 7/9/2021 MOFFETT PARK MASTER PLANNING Sunnyvale 7/30/2018

HYDROSTER GEM PROJECT IN KERN
COUNTY
Kern County 7/8/2021 ARNOLD RD AT DUBLIN BLVD TSM Dublin 7/28/2018

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | A3
TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ONCALLMillbrae 7/6/2021 GILROY SPEED SURVEY Gilroy 7/23/2018 ISLETON LRSP Isleton 7/6/2021 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS STORE Avenal 7/23/2018 SAN RAMON ALCOSTA TCP TO#2 San Ramon 7/2/2021 ON-CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING

SERVICES
American
Canyon
7/17/2018
UPDATE OAKLEY SPEED ZONES Oakley 6/30/2021 MERCED COUNTY ON-CALL Merced 7/3/2018 UPDATE THE TIF Oakley 6/30/2021 1201 SAN PABLO AVE MIXED USE Berkeley 7/2/2018 UPDATE 2021 CITYWIDE TRAFFIC
MODEL
Oakley 6/30/2021 2501 NORTH MAIN STREET Walnut Creek 6/26/2018 E. CYPRESS SPECIFIC PLAN FAIR
SHARE
Oakley 6/30/2021 LAUREL RD TS Antioch 6/25/2018
OAKLEY 2021 ON-CALL AS NEEDED
ONLY
Oakley 6/30/2021 SAFARI KIDS Dublin 6/22/2018
TULARE COUNTY LRSP Tulare
County
6/29/2021 840 East ECR Parking Management Sunnyvale 6/21/2018 ARYA EVENT CENTER STUDY Livermore 6/25/2021 PANATTONI WAREHOUSE Contra Costa County
6/19/2018
20 INTERSECTION FOLLOW-UP STUDY San Bruno 6/24/2021 TASSAJARA NURSERY TIS Danville 6/18/2018

VACAVILLE NORTH VILLAGE VMT

ANALYSIS
Vacaville 6/23/2021 REGIONAL SYSTEMATIC SAFETY

ANALYSIS RPT
Del Norte
County
6/12/2018
MHD LAND USES TRAFFIC STUDY San Joaquin
County
6/17/2021 CIRCULATION & TRAFFIC HANDLING
PLANS
Santa Clara
County
6/11/2018
FALLON GATEWAY ROUNDABOUT Dublin 6/17/2021 40500 Albrae Street Fremont 6/11/2018 SOUTH CENTRAL SPECIFIC PLAN Fresno 6/15/2021 TRAILSIDE TERRACE PROJECT Reedley 6/7/2018 VMT ANALYSIS FOR 2299 COMMERCE
WAY
Dixon 6/11/2021 3754 WILLIAMS ROAD San Jose 6/7/2018
SCHULTE ROAD SIGNING & STRIPINGLBA2Tracy 6/9/2021 REZONE AND GENERAL PLAN

AMENDMENT
Plymouth 6/4/2018

VTA CMP MONITORING &

CONFORMANCE REPORTS
Santa Clara
County
6/4/2021 TULARE - SIGNAL INSTALL FOUR

LOCATIONS
Tulare 6/1/2018
EDES MORGAN HILL Morgan Hill 6/2/2021 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS - POPE CHAUCER BRIDGE
Palo Alto 5/31/2018
MIDTOWN TRAIL - SEGMENT 1 Fresno 6/1/2021 THE VILLAGE AT TRACY LAKES Tracy 5/29/2018 AUSTIN TIA: 8110 E PARMER LANE Austin, TX 5/26/2021 919 MERIDIAN AVENUE TIS San Jose 5/25/2018 DGA MASTER ON-CALL AGREEMENT San Leandro 5/24/2021 TODD ROAD MIXED USE PROJECT Sonoma County
5/24/2018
1283 LUCRETIA AVENUE TIS San Jose 5/19/2021 PED AND BIKE SAFETY & CONNECT STUDY
Dinuba 5/23/2018
2701 HOOPER DRIVE San Ramon 5/19/2021 TH PLAN SR 237 ETSI PHASE 2 VTA 5/23/2018 ASHLEY FURNITURE TIS Lathrop 5/19/2021 CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS ON-CALL Citrus Heights 5/21/2018 CM SERVICES FARMERSVILLE BLVD Farmersville 5/19/2021 WISDOM TSM Fremont 5/16/2018 REVISE DEL MONTE SITE SIGNALS Alameda 5/11/2021 HAWTHORNE TECH CENTER II

WAREHOUSE
Livermore 5/16/2018

GOLDEN VALLEY PARKWAY &

SPARTAN WAY
Lathrop 5/11/2021 NEIGHBORHOODS J AND K TRAFFIC
STUDY
San Joaquin
County
5/15/2018
TRAFFIC STUDY FOR 455 HICKEY BLVD Daly City 5/10/2021 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS -

PHR/RVR/TAYLOR BLVD
Contra Costa
County
5/10/2018
GREENBACK & HICKORY TS MOD Sacramento
County
5/7/2021 PROJECT 18-XX TSM WINCHESTER Campbell 5/9/2018 YORBA LINDA LRSP Yorba Linda 5/4/2021 SIGN REFLECTIVITY Eureka 5/3/2018 LATHROP YOSEMITE-STREET A SIGNAL Lathrop 5/3/2021 I-580 DESIGN ALTERNATIVE

ASSESSMENT
MTC 5/2/2018
TRIANGLE PARKING STUDY Tracy 4/29/2021 SCARLETT DRIVE EXTENSION TS-TSM Dublin 5/1/2018 HGAC LIVABLE CENTER STUDY: BRAY
OAK
Houston, TX 4/28/2021 WEST GRAND TSP IMPLEMENTATION MTC 5/1/2018

CYPRESS PRESERVE SIGNAL

WARRANTS
Oakley 4/22/2021 SYTIA IMPACT FEE STUDY Yuba City 5/1/2018 LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN Pinole 4/21/2021 SUNSHINE VISTA - TRAFFIC PEER REVIEW
Watsonville 4/30/2018

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | A4
WATERSTONE-TS-SS-SIC Vallejo 4/21/2021 SHILOH FINAL DEVELOPMENT Oakley 4/30/2018 MTN HOUSE NEIGHBORHOOD G San Joaquin
County
4/21/2021 I-880 ADAPTIVE RAMP METERING MTC 4/27/2018
CHESTNUT AVE AC OVERLAY Fresno 4/20/2021 SYSTEMATIC SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
Dinuba 4/26/2018
CALTRANS I-80 CMCP MODELING

SUPPORT
Solano
County
4/20/2021 KAMM AND GREENE SAFETY

IMPROVEMENT
Dinuba 4/23/2018
645 NATIONAL AVENUE Mountain
View
4/15/2021 CROSSWALK IMPROVE PS&E at 4

LOCATIONS
Menlo Park 4/20/2018
810 EAST DUNNE AVENUE TIS Morgan Hill 4/13/2021 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS - TALMAGE ROAD

REALIGN
Ukiah 4/19/2018
CLAYTON RD-BARBIS WY HAWK SS Concord 4/5/2021 HOME2 SUNNYVALE PROJECT Sunnyvale 4/19/2018

CUPERTINO HOMESTEAD DEANZA

SIGNAL MOD
Cupertino 4/5/2021 1833 FOURTH STREET TIS San Rafael 4/16/2018 GRADE SEPARATION PEER REVIEW Stockton 4/4/2021 40 AIRPORT BOULEVARD TIS South San Francisco
4/11/2018

MIDLAND ODESSA TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
MidlandOdessa, TX4/2/2021 SCTM 2018 UPDATE Sonoma
County
4/10/2018
UCDH RHT - PHASE 1 (SD & DD) Sacramento 4/1/2021 CONCORD ON-CALL 2018 Concord 4/5/2018 TAROB COURT PEER REVIEW/TRIPGEN Milpitas 4/1/2021 STOCKTON HAMMER & THORNTON

LT SIG MOD
Stockton 3/29/2018
CHP PROJECT-PESCADERO-CHP TSM Tracy 3/31/2021 LYDIKSEN SCHOOL CIRCULATION Pleasant Hill 3/26/2018 CHICK-FIL-A TRAFFIC MEMO Livermore 3/29/2021 BYRON CORNER VALERO EXPANSION Contra Costa County
3/21/2018
10625 S FOOTHILL - VMT Cupertino 3/25/2021 NAPA COUNTY ON-CALL TRAFFIC

ENGINEERING
Napa County 3/21/2018
EXPERT SERVICES FOR SOVY CASE Washington,
State of
3/25/2021 ON-CALL SIGNAL DESIGN AND

SERVICES
San Luis
Obispo Co.
3/21/2018
ASTI APARTMENTS TIS Cloverdale 3/24/2021 2198 SAN PABLO AVENUE TIS Berkeley 3/21/2018 FOX HAVEN RANCH STUDY Contra Costa
County
3/22/2021 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS TIS Madera
County
3/21/2018
MORRIS ST STRIPING IMPACT Sebastopol 3/17/2021 Mt. Diablo Blvd at Mt. Diable Ct. TS Lafayette 3/19/2018 2021 C/CAG CMP UPDATE San Mateo
County
3/15/2021 HUNTER STREET RD DIET HSIPL-5008
(I55)
Stockton 3/19/2018

DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ON-CALL

SERVICES
Mountain
View
3/12/2021 MERCY WELLNESS TRIP GENERATION Sonoma
County
3/19/2018
LAUREL RD @ CANADA RD TS Antioch 3/9/2021 SANTA CLARA USD PARKING LOT SURVEY
Santa Clara 3/15/2018
TCAG ABM MODEL COMPONENTS Tulare
County
3/9/2021 SOUTH OF TIOGA PEER REVIEW Seaside 3/14/2018
WALNUT AT REMINGTON TS-SS Brentwood 3/9/2021 BANCROFT WAY AT GRANT LINE ROAD
San Joaquin
County
3/13/2018
TRAFFIC STUDY FOR 851

SACRAMENTO
West
Sacramento
3/8/2021 SONESTA HOTEL PARKING DEMAND Milpitas 3/9/2018 2824 HALCYON VMT San Jose 3/4/2021 EL CAMINO REAL SIGNAL

COORDINATION
Belmont 3/7/2018
CALVINE STATION TIS Sacramento
County
3/2/2021 HATHAWAY WAY A MAIN ENTRANCE
TSM-SS
Hayward 3/1/2018
401 TAYLOR NEW RESIDENTIAL TIS Pleasant Hill 3/2/2021 Graham vs. Saratoga Saratoga 3/1/2018

STARBUCKS INTERNATIONAL &

TUCKER TIS
Oakland 2/25/2021 VASCO RD - LAS POSITAS

WAREHOUSE
Livermore 2/28/2018
ELK GROVE PLAZA III TIS Elk Grove 2/25/2021 MG RETAIL Pleasant Hill 2/21/2018 TITAL TOWING TRAFFIC STUDY San Joaquin
County
2/22/2021 5952 Silver Creek Valley Road TIS San Jose 2/14/2018 Caltrans D5 On-Call Project California,
State of
2/22/2021 DEL DONO II MIXED-USE

DEVELOPMENT TIA
Carmel-bythe-Sea2/11/2018
HIGH VALLEY ROAD GROWHOUSE Lake County 2/11/2021 NNTMA Needs Assessment Sacramento 2/9/2018 NICK GUST WAY TDM Pacifica 2/10/2021 REPUBLIC SQUARE PROJECT RRFB Livermore 2/8/2018

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | A5
MANTECA RETAIL SITE TIS Manteca 2/10/2021 VARIOUS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SIP
Citrus Heights 2/8/2018
Palo Alto On-Call Palo Alto 2/8/2021 TOMPKINS AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDIES Oakland 2/8/2018

NEI PROJECT ALONG GLR-CHRISMAN

TS-TSM-SS
Tracy 2/1/2021 HOTEL PARMANI PARKING DEMAND Palo Alto 2/7/2018

OLD FITZHUGH ROAD GRANT

WRITING
Dripping
Springs, TX
1/26/2021 MTC SHRP2 TASK ORDER 01-16
AMENDMENT 1
MTC 2/6/2018
VASCO ROAD WIDENING Livermore 1/22/2021 COMPASS_2018_MODELING_ON_CALL Idaho, State of 2/5/2018

CONCORD ON-CALL - AGREEMENT
5836
Concord 1/21/2021 CENTERPOINT TRAFFIC STUDY Oakland 2/1/2018 KERN COG LRSP Kern County 1/21/2021 HOTEL/RETAIL/RESTAURANT ALONG

HOPE ST
Mountain
View
1/31/2018

KAMM AND ALTA ROUNDABOUT
DESIGN
Dinuba 1/21/2021 DALY CITY CENTRAL CORRIDOR BIKE

AND PED
Daly City 1/30/2018
KERN COG LRSP Kern County 1/21/2021 IDYLWILD SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS Santa Clara County
1/30/2018
MCOG LRSP Mendocino
County
1/20/2021 GRANTLINE AT SKYLARK TS & SS Tracy 1/29/2018
MARTINEZ BAYVIEW VMT ANALYSIS Martinez 1/14/2021 LOCAL TRAFFIC FLOW/LONG RANGE

PLANNING
Atherton 1/29/2018
DINUBA LRSP Dinuba 1/12/2021 2018 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE
Windsor 1/26/2018

COTTON MEDICAL CENTER TRAFFIC
STUDY
Pasadena 1/12/2021 HOLLISTER MODELING Hollister 1/22/2018

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON

CYPRESS ROAD
Oakley 1/11/2021 PETALUMA HILLS RD AT KEISER TS &
SS
Rohnert Park 1/22/2018
CAMP METTA PARKING STUDY Santa Cruz
County
1/6/2021 Marina On-Call Marina 1/20/2018

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON

VINEYARD DRIVE
San Luis
Obispo Co.
1/4/2021 2018 OVERLAY PROJECT - TI CALCS Sacramento 1/19/2018

LATHROP YOSEMITE-MCKINLEY

INTERIM SIGNAL
Lathrop 1/4/2021 MUSTANG AT DEANZA TSM San Joaquin
County
1/18/2018

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

STRATEGIC PLAN
Cedar Hill, TX 1/4/2021 LONE TREE PLAZA TS & SS Brentwood 1/17/2018

CONCORD WILLOW PASS SIGNAL

UPGRADES
Concord 12/28/2020 Mossdale Landing Apts TS & SS Lathrop 1/9/2018 PAULSEN V MIDPEN HOUSING Santa Rosa 12/28/2020 VOYAGER PROLOGIS TIS Livermore 12/27/2017 WILLOW PASS COURT RETAIL CENTER Contra Costa
County
12/21/2020 HSIP7-04-18 PROJECT 1 - CL RUMBLE
STRIPS
Pittsburg 12/21/2017
FRESNO SEDA SPECIFIC PLAN Fresno 12/21/2020 HSIP7-04-19 PROJECT 2 - Protect LT & SS
Pittsburg 12/21/2017
650 CAPE BRETON Pacifica 12/18/2020 HSIP7-04-20 PROJECT 3 - HFST Pittsburg 12/21/2017 590 CASTRO STREET MTA Mountain
View
12/17/2020 OWENS AT HOPYARD TSM Pleasanton 12/15/2017
PLYMOUTH REALIGNMENT Mountain
View
12/16/2020 EVP FEASIBILITY STUDY Campbell 12/14/2017

VALLEJO HOTEL VMT OUTPUT FROM
SNABM
Vallejo 12/15/2020 Rohnerville Airport Connectivity Study Humboldt County
12/13/2017
2323-2391 MOORPARK AVENUE San Jose 12/14/2020 LAM RESEARCH SAFETY ANALYSIS Fremont 12/12/2017 MARINER'S COVE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Vallejo 12/10/2020 SESSION CLIMBING PARKING &

TRAFFIC
Santa Rosa 12/7/2017
LANDER AVE AND F STREET Turlock 12/9/2020 ALAMEDA COUNTY HATHAWAY SELF

STORAGE
Alameda
County
12/7/2017
SIGNAL COORDINATION Turlock 12/9/2020 DUNKIN DONUTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Pleasant Hill 12/5/2017 HIGHWAY 49 HSIP STREET LIGHTING

PROJECT
Jackson 12/9/2020 1920 & 1940 SAN PABLO AVENUE Berkeley 12/5/2017 MILLBRAE LRSP Millbrae 11/30/2020 PHELAN COMPANY TRAFFIC STUDY San Joaquin County
11/29/2017
CHOWCHILLA LRSP Chowchilla 11/20/2020 FORD V. REYNA Visalia 11/28/2017

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | A6

MIDTOWN FRESNO SCHOOL AREA TS

PROJECT
Fresno 11/19/2020 I-680 INTERCHANGE BIKE/PED

IMPROVEMENTS
Fremont 11/27/2017
MTN. HOUSE SHOPPING CENTER San Joaquin
County
11/19/2020 OYSTER POINT & E. GRAND

IMPROVEMENTS
South San
Francisco
11/27/2017
EUREKA SW #03A3085; TO #1; EA 01-
0G4201
California,
State of
11/11/2020 UPDATING PARKING REGULATIONS Grover Beach 11/27/2017 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AT 440 1ST STREET Los Altos 11/9/2020 VIETNAM TOWN PHASE 2

CIRCULATION STUDY
San Jose 11/16/2017
PRIMROSE SCHOOL TIS San Ramon 11/4/2020 MUSD CAMPUS TRAFFIC

ASSESSMENTS
Manteca 11/16/2017
EL CAMINO APTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Sacramento 10/22/2020 ANALYSIS OF SR 12 NEAR RIO VISTA Rio Vista 11/15/2017

CALAVERAS BOULEVARD

IMPROVEMENTS
VTA 10/22/2020 COTATI HOTEL Cotati 11/14/2017
CHICK-FILLA TSM N. LIVERMORE AVE Livermore 10/21/2020 BASCOM AND WOODARD CAR WASH San Jose 11/14/2017

GRANT LINE RD FROM GVP TO

CENTRAL TH
San Joaquin
Valley
10/20/2020 STAYBRIDGE HOTEL TIS Livermore 11/14/2017
CA ST ROAD DIET TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Stockton 10/16/2020 LAWRENCE WAY HOTEL SITE CEQA Walnut Creek 11/10/2017 NORCAL VOLLEYBALL TRIP GEN Livermore 10/13/2020 1411 - 1495 EL CAMINO REAL Mountain View
11/8/2017
NUNEZ V. LENNAR San
Bernardino
County
10/13/2020 645 NATIONAL AVENUE Mountain
View
11/8/2017

SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS

LOCATIONS
Dinuba 10/9/2020 DISTILLERY TRAFFIC STUDY Santa Rosa 11/8/2017

BURROUGHS RESIDENTIAL

DEVELOPMENT TIS
Oakley 9/30/2020 DOWNTOWN STREET CIRCULATION

PROJECT
Redding 11/1/2017
EMERYVILLE IDEA PROJECT Emeryville 9/29/2020 NORRIS CANYON TRAFFIC CALMING UPDATE
San Ramon 11/1/2017
RETAIL CENTER TS-SS CAPITAL Tracy 9/28/2020 SLO TRANSPORTATION ON-CALL

SERVICES
San Luis
Obispo
10/31/2017

STANFORD CROSSING AT GOLDEN
TS-SS
Lathrop 9/28/2020 MILLS CREEK EIR Windsor 10/31/2017
GOLDEN VALLEY PKWY AT PHASE 1D
INT #8
Lathrop 9/28/2020 STARBUCKS CAPITOL & SNELL San Jose 10/26/2017 TIBURON GENERAL PLAN Tiburon 9/17/2020 RRFB HAMILTON AVENUE Menlo Park 10/25/2017 GUERNEVILLE HOTEL VMT Sonoma
County
9/12/2020 KELLY ROAD AT HIGHWAY 29 American
Canyon
10/24/2017
SAN MARCOS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN San Marcos,
TX
9/10/2020 679 HICKEY BOULEVARD TIS Pacifica 10/24/2017
LOS GATOS ATMS AND ATCS Los Gatos 9/8/2020 Hercules Willow Ave Commercial Center
Hercules 10/24/2017
ANTIOCH LRSP Antioch 9/8/2020 BELL AVENUE COMPLETE STREETS TI Sacramento 10/24/2017

GLENDALE LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN
( LRSP)
Glendale 9/8/2020 NELSON HILL ANALYSIS Fairfield 10/20/2017 UPS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Fremont 9/4/2020 IDEA GRANT TECH ASSISTANCE Los Gatos 10/16/2017 39888 BALENTINE DRIVE, NEWARK Newark 9/2/2020 SEASIDE 10 YEAR SPEED SURVEY

EXTENSION
Seaside 10/16/2017
DIABLO CANYON TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Clayton 9/1/2020 1098 El CAMINO REAL TIS San Carlos 10/12/2017 VMT ANALYSIS FOR NAPA COUNTY Napa County 9/1/2020 BART D-P PARKING TRAFFIC STUDY BART 10/12/2017 ADAMS LANE VMT Brentwood 8/31/2020 CCTA AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES

MODELING
Contra Costa
Transportation
Authority
10/10/2017

BYRON AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT

PROGRAM VMT
Contra Costa
County
8/31/2020 BERNAL AT NEVADA TS-SS CIP 17532 Pleasanton 10/6/2017 TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS Waxahachie,
TX
8/31/2020 CROWS LANDING CORRIDOR

IMPROVEMENTS
Stanislaus
County
10/4/2017
245 S SPRUCE TDM South San
Francisco
8/28/2020 UNION CITY HSIP CYCLE 8 SIG

IMPROVEMENTS
Union City 10/1/2017

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | A7
REPUBLIC SQUARE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Livermore 8/27/2020 DIF PROGRAM UPDATE & NEXUS STUDY
Los Banos 9/28/2017
RIGGIN AND SHIRK TS MOD Visalia 8/27/2020 PARKING MGMT. PLAN FOR

DOWNTOWN BRENTWOOD
Brentwood 9/25/2017
FARMERSVILLE LRSP Farmersville 8/25/2020 31ST EXTENSION San Mateo 9/13/2017 STARBUCKS HWY 4 & BIXLER
(DISCOVERY BAY)
Contra Costa
County
8/20/2020 Cypress Self Storage TSM-SS Oakley 9/12/2017

TRACY HILLS AT CORRAL HOLLOW
TSM
Tracy 8/20/2020 ON-CALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS PS&E TS
& SS
Fremont 9/11/2017
192238, DE20-1035-05, D-1222,
Anderson
PG&E 8/20/2020 ON-CALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS

ENGINEERING
Fremont 9/11/2017
192235, Michels, EC20-1611, 84011378 PG&E 8/14/2020 AUBURN GROVE AT FIRST STREET TS Livermore 9/11/2017 192236, Michels, SD20-008, 44181546 PG&E 8/14/2020 SJCOG 2018 RTP/SCS Technical Services
San Joaquin
County
9/8/2017
VALLE VISTA AT MISSION TSM #2 Hayward 8/8/2020 REDWOOD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT TIS
Redwood City 9/8/2017

TRAFFIC CONTROL/DETOUR PLAN

GRANT LINE
San Joaquin
County
8/5/2020 CITYWIDE SPEED SURVEY Hollister 9/5/2017

FIBER OPTIC SIC-HANSEN TO

LAMMERS
Tracy 8/1/2020 THE BARLOW PARKING STUDY Sebastopol 9/5/2017 LANGSTON II TRAFFIC STUDY San Joaquin
County
7/28/2020 1328 COFFEE RD MODESTO-DIALYSIS

PARK STUDY
Modesto 9/5/2017
I-680 INTERCHANGES

MODERNIZATION PROJECT
Fremont 7/27/2020 IRBY RANCH PROPERTY TSM Pleasanton 8/29/2017 FY20-23 ON-CALL TE &

TRANSPORTATION
South San
Francisco
7/27/2020 LITTLE GENIUS ACADEMY TIS Contra Costa
County
8/28/2017
192175, CC-367, D-1108, 74030166,
Capay
PG&E 7/24/2020 255 DUTTON AVE GAS STATION

EXPANSION
Santa Rosa 8/28/2017
192234, ID-96-2020, D-1198,
84013601
PG&E 7/24/2020 YOLO COUNTY - ON-CALL Yolo County 8/24/2017

SACRAMENTO STREET ROAD DIET

PROJECT
Vallejo 7/23/2020 GRANT LINE RD AT CORRAL HOLLOW
TSM-SS
Tracy 8/24/2017

PARKING DEMAND STUDY - ASSISTED
LIVING
Martinez 7/22/2020 EW: Salcido v. Gilroy Gilroy 8/23/2017 192233, ID-136, 84012549, PETALUMA,
TCP
PG&E 7/20/2020 BORDONI RANCH - PHASE 2A & 2B Vallejo 8/23/2017 192198, IC20-21, D-1186, 84011397,
Napa
PG&E 7/20/2020 SNABM MODELING ON-CALL

SERVICES
Solano County 8/16/2017
PHB EDUCATIONAL FLYER Fresno 7/20/2020 3045 Park Blvd TIS - New Project Palo Alto 8/16/2017 2101 N FREMONT STREET TRAFFIC
STUDY
Monterey 7/16/2020 GREATER DOWNTOWN ATP Stockton 8/15/2017 HARBOR STRIPING Alameda 7/15/2020 MANTECA RETROREFLECTIVITY SIGN

PROJECT
Manteca 8/15/2017

TSM & SS FOR EMPIRE ROAD AT

WICKLOW WAY
Brentwood 7/14/2020 MIDPENINSULA OPEN SPACE ONCALLMidPeninsula 8/14/2017 TMT TRAFFIC STUDY IN VISALIA Visalia 7/10/2020 LAS PALMAS HOA EVALUATION Monterey County
8/14/2017
192232_EC20-0613_D-1124_84011376 PG&E 7/10/2020 UC CENTRAL SIGNAL SYS EVAL &

MTC GRANT
Union City 8/4/2017

CONCORD SIGNAL HARDWARE

UPGRADES
Concord 7/7/2020 ALMADEN EXPRESSWAY &

REDMOND AVENUE TIS
San Jose 8/2/2017
On-CALL SIGNAL / STREETLIGHT
REPAIR
Concord 7/1/2020 FRESNO COG MODELING ON-CALL

SERVICES
Fresno County 8/1/2017

TOWN OF LOS GATOS STAFF

SUPPORT
Los Gatos 7/1/2020 FRESNO COG MODELING ON-CALL
SERVICES 2
Fresno County 8/1/2017
EUREKA ON-CALL 2020 Eureka 7/1/2020 MTC PASS 2017/18 CITY OF

CONCORD
MTC 8/1/2017

EDGEWOOD COM TSM-SS

MIDDLEFIELD-CHR
Tracy 6/30/2020 MTC PASS 2017/18 CITY OF BELMONT MTC 8/1/2017

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | A8

ON CALL GRANT & TECHNICAL

ASSISTANCE
Stockton 6/30/2020 MTC PASS 2017/18 CITY OF DANVILLE MTC 8/1/2017 323 S LIVERMORE AVENUE TIS Livermore 6/25/2020 MTC PASS 2018/19 CITY OF FAIRFIELD MTC 8/1/2017 US 101/SAN

ANTONIO/CHARLESTON/RENGSTORFF
VTA 6/23/2020 MTC PASS 2018/19 CITY OF PALO
ALTO
MTC 8/1/2017
CLAYTON COMMUNITY CHURCH TIS Clayton 6/17/2020 MTC PASS 2018/19 CITY OF

PITTSBURG
MTC 8/1/2017

TODD ROAD INTERSECTION

REALIGNMENT
Sonoma
County
6/17/2020 SANTA FE & RIGGINS TS Visalia 8/1/2017
OLIVEROS VS CITY OF FULLERTON Fullerton 6/13/2020 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR WOODTOWN SPORTS
Fairfax 8/1/2017
HSIP CYCLE 10 APPLICATION

PREPARATION
Solano
County
6/12/2020 ARCH ROAD AT NEW CASTLE ROAD
TSM
Stockton 7/31/2017

NEI PROJECT ALONG GLR-CHRISMAN

TS-SM-SS
Tracy 6/4/2020 LOS ALTOS DOWNTOWN OFFICE

DEVELOPMENT
Los Altos 7/28/2017
16179 MOZART AVE FTIA Campbell 6/4/2020 NORTH-SOUTH MULTIMODAL

CORRIDOR PLAN
Eureka 7/26/2017
EAST PALO ALTO ON-CALL East Palo
Alto
6/1/2020 HINES V. MACERICH - WC PARKING
GARAGE
Walnut Creek 7/24/2017

LAWRENCE STATION AREA PED &
BIKE
Sunnyvale 5/27/2020 SAN BENITO COUNTY WASTE IMPACT

FEE STUDY
San Benito
County
7/21/2017
25 ORINDA WAY TRAFFIC STUDIES Orinda 5/27/2020 REMINGTON & MICHELANGELO DR Sunnyvale 7/20/2017

PITTSBURG SIGNAL HARDWARE

UPGRADES
Pittsburg 5/19/2020 7300 AMADOR PLAZA TSM-SS Dublin 7/18/2017

CORRAL HOLLOW RD/VALPICO RD,
CIP 72095
Tracy 5/19/2020 MANTECA TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPDATE
PROJ
Manteca 7/17/2017
EXPANSION OF FOOTHILL CROSSING Los Altos 5/15/2020 70 N. KNOLL ROAD TRAFFIC STUDY Marin County 7/14/2017

SUNRISE AT GARDEN VALLEY

RESIDENTIAL TIA
Waxahachie,
TX
5/13/2020 DIALYSIS TRAFFIC STUDY South San
Francisco
6/29/2017
IDAHO MARYLAND MINE EIR Nevada
County
5/12/2020 MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL BON AIR

TRF STUDY
Marin County 6/28/2017
DUKE PROJECT Tracy 5/12/2020 DINUBA SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION Dinuba 6/28/2017 UCDH SIGNAL INSTALL Sacramento 5/12/2020 The Shoppes TSM and SS Livermore 6/26/2017 DEMAREE & PACKWOOD TS MOD Visalia 5/4/2020 FARIA DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY San Ramon 6/20/2017 2016 BASE YEAR UPDATE TO SJCOG
MODEL
San Joaquin
County
5/1/2020 NAPA SR 29 SIGNAL PHASING &

TIMING EVALUATE
Napa 6/16/2017
SR-91 TRANSMODELER TOLL

UPGRADE
Orange
County
5/1/2020 HAYWARD VALLE VISTA TIS Hayward 6/16/2017
EAST AVENUE CORRIDOR PLAN Livermore 4/30/2020 PALOMARES HILLS TRAFFIC STUDY Alameda County
6/12/2017

PARKING ANALYSIS FOR PARKWEST
CASINO 580
Livermore 4/28/2020 MTV CAMPUS: R219: 2017

TRANSPORT PLAN
Sunnyvale 6/8/2017
2020-2021 MONITORING & CMP
UPDATE
Marin
County
4/24/2020 9-INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT

STUDY-GOOGLE
Sunnyvale 6/8/2017
840 El CAMINO REAL TDM South San
Francisco
4/22/2020 DUNSLEE WAY AMENDMENT Scotts Valley 6/8/2017

CITYWIDE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
Patterson 4/21/2020 SIGNAL HARDWARE AND WIRING AT
HENDY
Sunnyvale 6/7/2017
DINUBA - ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS Dinuba 4/17/2020 MISSION BLVD PHASE 3 FINAL DESIGN
Hayward 6/6/2017

CENTRAL PKWY AT GRANT LINE RD
PSE
San Joaquin
County
4/16/2020 TRAFFIC STUDY NEW LIFE ALAMO Contra Costa
County
6/5/2017
RIVER ISLAND PARKWAY WIDENING Lathrop 4/15/2020 MAIN STREET-SHENANDOAH ROAD SRTS
Plymouth 5/31/2017
CAROL SHELTON WINERY TIS Windsor 4/13/2020 700 W. HAMILTON PARKING STUDY Campbell 5/31/2017 FOLSOM LRSP Folsom 4/10/2020 STARBUCKS AT GARMIN RANCH,

BRENTWOOD
Brentwood 5/25/2017
ON-CALL GRANT APPLICATIONS Moreno
Valley
4/10/2020 SHEA PROPERTIES DIMANTO SITE

TRAFFIC
Dublin 5/22/2017

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | A9

WALNUT VILLAS TRAFFIC STUDY IN

BRENTWOOD
Brentwood 4/6/2020 840 EL CAMINO REAL Mountain
View
5/19/2017

EVERGREEN COLLEGE ENTRY TRAFFIC
STUDY
San Jose 4/3/2020 SCB-I80 RAMP IMPROVEMENT

ANALYSIS
Rocklin 5/15/2017
676 DANA STREET TIS Mountain
View
4/1/2020 MILLBRAE TRAFFIC &

TRANSPORTATION ON-CAL
Millbrae 5/11/2017
VISALIA PARKING STUDY Visalia 3/30/2020 DUMBARTON CORRIDOR DATA

COLLECTION
MTC 5/8/2017
MCCARTHY BLVD & RANCH DR TSM Milpitas 3/25/2020 VILLAGE AT TOWN CENTER TRAFFIC STUDY
El Cerrito 5/8/2017
SP III TRAFFIC UPDATE San Joaquin
County
3/25/2020 SHORELINE BLVD-ADDITIONAL

VISSIM ANALYSIS
Mountain
View
5/8/2017

CROSSWALK ANALYSIS IN MOFFETT
PARK
Sunnyvale 3/23/2020 COMPASS 2017 MODELING ON-CALL Idaho, State of 5/3/2017 VTA TRANSCORE PH3 San Jose 3/18/2020 STARBUCKS MOWRY & CEDAR

NEWARK QUEUING
Newark 4/27/2017
YUBA CITY SSAR Yuba City 3/18/2020 SAN BRUNO ROADWAY

INTERSECTION SFTY STUDY
San Bruno 4/21/2017
GRANT LINE ROAD DETOUR STUDY San Joaquin
County
3/9/2020 CLEARLAKE DAM ROAD EXTENSION

PROJECT
Clearlake 4/21/2017
TS & TIS CENTENNIAL VILLAGE South San
Francisco
3/6/2020 REPUBLIC SQUARE PROJECT Livermore 4/20/2017

OLD MIDDLEFIELD WAY CONNECTION

PROJECT
Mountain
View
3/5/2020 GRANT LINE RD SIGNING & STRIPING
PLANS
San Joaquin
County
4/20/2017
200 N BASCOM AVENUE TIS San Jose 3/2/2020 WAREHOUSE QUEUING ANALYSIS Oakland 4/20/2017

STARBUCKS COUNTS FOR N MAIN & E

BORUNDA
Salinas 2/27/2020 MERCED PARKING DEMAND STUDY Merced 4/19/2017 LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN Culver City 2/26/2020 4707 FIRST STREET CHEVRON GAS

STATION
Livermore 4/18/2017
MAIN & BROADWAY TS MOD Santa Maria 2/24/2020 SOUTH SHORE CENTER PARKING STUDY
Alameda 4/17/2017
656 LYTTON AVE & 649 UNIVERSITY
AVE
Palo Alto 2/21/2020 ARNAUDO BLVD AT PROVIDENCE

STREET TSM
San Joaquin
County
4/16/2017

RIGGIN & AKERS VIDEO DETECTION

SIG MOD
Visalia 2/20/2020 CORRAL HOLLOW ROAD WIDENING,
TRACY
Tracy 4/14/2017
MAIN STREET COMPLETE STREETS Stockton 2/13/2020 WEST LANE PED IMPROVEMENTS Stockton 4/13/2017

PARK MARINA DRIVE CORRIDOR
PLAN
Redding 2/12/2020 DIALYSIS CENTER TRAFFIC STUDY Watsonville 4/12/2017 NCTC/GRASS VALLEY TDM UPDATE Nevada
County
2/11/2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS Rio Vista 4/12/2017 3785 SANTA ROSA AVENUE TIS Santa Rosa 2/10/2020 MARIPOSA BIOMASS FOCUSED TIA Mariposa County
4/10/2017
TSM & SS FOR SHADY WILLOWAMBERBrentwood 2/6/2020 Circulation Study for 433 Mason St Hotel
San Francisco 4/7/2017

ANGELS CAMP ROADWAY SAFETY

SIGNING AUDIT
Angels Camp 2/5/2020 BIKE AND PED IMPROVEMENTS ON

FIRST ST
Gilroy 4/5/2017

DUBLIN CANYON/CANYON

MEADOWS TS-SS
Pleasanton 2/4/2020 LEFT TURN LANE EVALUATION San Pablo 3/29/2017

TRAFFIC STUDY FOR BURLINGAME
BAY
Burlingame 2/3/2020 AC TRANSIT LINE 97BRT Alameda
County
3/27/2017
CENTRAL PARKWAY PHASE 3 SS
PLANS
San Joaquin
County
1/29/2020 TIS for 912 HARBOR AVENUE Richmond 3/27/2017
CENTRAL PARKWAY PHASE 1 W-E SS
PLANS
San Joaquin
County
1/29/2020 HILLTOP DRIVE CORRIDOR SIGNAL

OPT STUDY
Redding 3/23/2017
O'REILLY AUTO PARTS TIS Jurupa Valley 1/28/2020 STREET LIGHTS CONDUIT

REPLACEMENT
Sunnyvale 3/16/2017
SADDLEBACK HOA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Contra Costa
County
1/27/2020 CITY OF OAKLAND ON-CALL TRANSP

ENG SERV
Oakland 3/8/2017

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | A10
DINUBA - ATP CYCLE 5 APPS &

CONCEPTS
Dinuba 1/27/2020 1110 UNIVERSITY AVENUE PARKING
STUDY
Berkeley 3/8/2017
LOUISE AVE-CAMBRIDGE TSM Lathrop 1/27/2020 PACIFIC COMMONS 2017 DESIGN Fremont 3/7/2017 AMY'S ROSEVILLE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Roseville 1/23/2020 COFFEE SHOP PARKING STUDY Milpitas 3/5/2017 5150 EL CAMINO REAL TSM Mountain
View
1/23/2020 HAMILTON CHURCH PARKING

ANALYSIS
Pittsburg 3/3/2017

SOSCOL SQUARE TRAFFIC IMPACT
STUDY
Napa 1/23/2020 CRESLEIGH HOMES TIA Campbell 3/1/2017
ADIBS PERSIAN RUG PARKING STUDY Walnut
Creek
1/23/2020 ADMIRAL CALLAGHAN-ROTARY WAY
TS-SS
Dublin 2/27/2017
5607 ALMADEN EXPRESSWAY TIS San Jose 1/22/2020 SPA TRAFFIC AND PARKING STUDY Walnut Creek 2/27/2017 PROMONTORY FIBER INTERCONNECT Tracy 1/21/2020 TCM BASE YEAR MODEL UPDATE AND

SUPPORT
San Joaquin
County
2/23/2017
12950 ROBLEDA ROAD SAFETY STUDY Los Altos
Hills
1/21/2020 THE PRESERVE PROJECT San Ramon 2/23/2017

SAN MARCO WEST LELAND

EXTENSION
Pittsburg 1/21/2020 SUNSET AVE AND WALTERS RD
IMPROVEMENTS 1
Suisun City 2/21/2017
SHADELANDS GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Walnut
Creek
1/19/2020 240 SHORELINE HIGHWAY CAR WASH Marin County 2/20/2017 SHADELANDS 2800 MITCHELL TIS Walnut
Creek
1/17/2020 GREENVILLE ROAD WAREHOUSE TIS Livermore 2/17/2017 RALSTON-EUCALYPTUS SAFETY STUDY Hillsborough 1/14/2020 GREENVILLE ROAD WAREHOUSE TIS Livermore 2/17/2017

ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS IN MOFFETT
PARK
Sunnyvale 1/6/2020 DEANZA BLVD SIGNING AND

STRIPING PLANS
San Joaquin
County
2/16/2017

TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR GILDED

SPRINGS
Grass Valley 12/23/2019 W. WINTON WAREHOUSE TIS Hayward 2/15/2017

RIDGE VILLAGE SIGHT DISTANCE

ANALYSIS
Grass Valley 12/19/2019 CHURCH OF THE VALLEY TIS San Ramon 2/15/2017 ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY Palm Desert 12/12/2019 MCKAY RANCH TIS Humboldt County
2/13/2017
AMBROSE VILLAGE TRAFFIC STUDY Contra Costa
County
12/11/2019 THE BOULEVARD PROJECT Dublin 2/8/2017

CROAK RANCH RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC
STUDY
Dublin 12/6/2019 ELK GROVE PLAZA III TIS Elk Grove 2/3/2017

STANFORD CROSSING SIGNAL

WARRANT STUDY
Lathrop 12/4/2019 OLD SCHULTE ROAD SIGNING AND

STRIPING
Tracy 2/1/2017
TRAFFIC CALMING ACTION PLAN Atherton 12/3/2019 THE TRIANGLE Lathrop 1/30/2017

TRAFFIC STUDY FOR TWO

INTERSECTIONS
San Joaquin
County
11/22/2019 BISHOP O'DOWD STADIUM STUDY Oakland 1/30/2017

SINGH COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
TIS
Oakley 11/18/2019 BASCOM CORRIDOR COMPLETE

STREETS STUDY
Santa Clara
County
1/27/2017
SR 53 CORRIDOR CIRCULATION
STUDY
Lake County 11/15/2019 DIPSEA RANCH RESIDENTIAL TIS Marin County 1/23/2017 854 WHIPPLE AVE MTG ATTENDANCE Union City 11/15/2019 HILLSDALE MINI STORAGE FOCUSED TIS
Sacramento
County
1/18/2017
WOODMARK APARTMENTS TIS Sebastopol 11/14/2019 SAN MATEO DOWNTOWN PARKING

IMPLEMENTATION
San Mateo 1/17/2017
1610 TULLY ROAD TIS San Jose 11/14/2019 TOWN CENTER ACCESS STUDY San Joaquin County
1/12/2017
GRAPE LANE TRAFFIC STUDY Napa County 11/14/2019 NORTH BAYSHORE VISSIM ANALYSIS Mountain View
12/26/2016
101 FELIX TRAFFIC STUDY Santa Cruz 11/14/2019 RRFB INSTALL - PEDESTRIAN SAFETY

PROJECT
Manteca 12/22/2016

STARBUCKS SERRAMONTE QUEUING
STUDY
Daly City 11/13/2019 RD 36 AT AVENUE 12 1/2 SIGNAL

INSTALL
Madera
County
12/22/2016
I-10 Corridor Contract No. 17-1001617 San
Bernardino
County
11/7/2019 I-80/GILMAN INTERCHANGE Alameda
County
12/21/2016
MINES AT TECHNOLOGY TSM-SS Livermore 11/4/2019 PESCADERO ROAD TSM & SS Tracy 12/20/2016

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | A11
5460 DUNWOOD WAY TIS San Jose 10/30/2019 RV PARK SPACES Santa Clara County
12/14/2016
CENTURY PLAZA TIA PEER REVIEW Pittsburg 10/24/2019 NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH TIS American Canyon
12/9/2016
CONCORD AT GALINDO SITE STUDY Concord 10/23/2019 SAND CREEK COMMONS TIS Brentwood 12/8/2016 2521 REGENT STREET PARKING STUDY Berkeley 10/23/2019 FAIRVIEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION Alameda County
12/7/2016
MTC PASS 2019 GRANT APPLICATION Mountain
View
10/23/2019 PINOLE GATEWAY STUDY - MEDICAL
CENTER
Pinole 12/2/2016
CHAPIN AVE FEASIBILITY STUDY Burlingame 10/22/2019 E14TH STREETSCAPE PROJECT Alameda County
12/1/2016

NAPA COUNTYWIDE

TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Napa County 10/16/2019 EVALUATION FOR LAVTA-DUBLIN

PROJECT
MTC 12/1/2016
CONCORD AIRPORT SELF STORAGE Concord 10/15/2019 MTC CONGESTION PRICING

ANALYSIS
MTC 11/28/2016
MISSION BLVD COMPLETE STREETS Alameda
County
10/14/2019 SAN JOSE KADENCE San Jose 11/23/2016
FREMONT AVE SS Los Altos 10/14/2019 Neighborhood Street Enhancement Program
Redwood City 11/22/2016
FOCUSED TIS 1325 E JULIAN STREET San Jose 10/3/2019 FERNANDEZ V. MODESTO EW Modesto 11/22/2016 788 San Antonio Road Mixed Use Palo Alto 10/3/2019 TRAFFIC SERVICES FOR DUBLIN HOTEL
Dublin 11/22/2016
OAKS BP TRIP GENERATION Livermore 9/26/2019 LA CLINICA PARKING STUDY IN

VALLEJO
Vallejo 11/18/2016
SIKH TEMPLE TRAFFIC ACCESS STUDY San Joaquin
County
9/26/2019 DANVILLE DOWNTOWN PARKING
STUDY
Danville 11/17/2016

SOUTH HILLSBOROUGH ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
Hillsborough 9/25/2019 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ON-CALL
2016 - 2020
South San
Francisco
11/12/2016

TULARE STREET RECONSTRUCTION

SIGNAL MOD
Tulare 9/19/2019 8.6 ACRE MIXED-USE DEVCALIFORNIA AVEMountain View
11/10/2016
EMPIRE PLAZA TRAFFIC STUDY Oakley 9/16/2019 SFOBB BIKE PATH QUEUING

ANALYSIS
MTC 11/10/2016

DISTRICT AT IRVINGTON PARKING
STUDY
Fremont 9/12/2019 LEIGH HIGH SCHOOL ANALYSIS San Jose 11/9/2016

MASS TIMBER CAMPUS CROSSWALK
STUDY
Sunnyvale 9/12/2019 QUARRY LANE SCHOOL LETTER Dublin 11/8/2016 493 EASTMOOR AVENUE TIS Daly City 9/9/2019 2756 ALVARADO STREET San Leandro 10/24/2016 LONGMIRE VS CITY OF BRENTWOOD Brentwood 9/6/2019 NICHOLSON V. PACIFICA Pacifica 10/24/2016 TRIP GENERATION STUDY Concord 9/6/2019 DEANZA BLVD AT GRANT LINE ROAD San Joaquin County
10/21/2016
717 DONOHOE STREET FOCUSED

TRAFFIC STUDY
East Palo
Alto
8/29/2019 MOUNTAIN HOUSE PARKWAY AT

TEIXEIRA AVE
San Joaquin
County
10/21/2016
MAKING WAVES TIS IN PINOLE Pinole 8/27/2019 DEANZA BOULEVARD AT TEIXEIRA AVENUE
San Joaquin
County
10/21/2016

SCOTTS VALLEY ACTIVE

TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Scotts Valley 8/23/2019 PROSPERITY ROAD AT GRANT LINE
ROAD
San Joaquin
County
10/21/2016
MILL SITE REUSE PLAN TRANSP STUDY Fort Bragg 8/23/2019 BAY BRIDGE METERING LIGHTS

UPGRADE
MTC 10/17/2016
3568 ARCH ROAD Stockton 8/20/2019 STOCKTON DIESEL TECHNICAL

MEMORANDUM
San Joaquin
County
10/13/2016
PLEASANT HILL SPEED ZONES UPDATE Pleasant Hill 8/19/2019 EVENT CENTER Pleasanton 10/12/2016

GASLIGHT SHOPPING CENTER

PARKING STUDY
Fremont 8/16/2019 AVILA ESTATES Livermore 10/10/2016

SNABM MODEL VALIDATION AND

CALIBRATION
Solano
County
8/15/2019 TS MOD CENTRAL EXPWY AT CASTRO
ST
Mountain
View
10/10/2016
OAKLEY COMMUNITY PARK Oakley 8/13/2019 ROCKVILLE SPRINGS PROJECT Dublin 10/6/2016 ATWATER MERCED EXPRESSWAY Merced
County
8/12/2019 ELEVENTH AND MAC ARTHUR

TRAFFIC CONTROL
Tracy 10/6/2016
SHELL OIL DRIVEWAY ANALYSIS Pleasanton 8/9/2019 PIONEER AVENUE TOWNHOMES TIS Walnut Creek 10/4/2016

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | A12
HWY 9 XING IMP Los Gatos 8/8/2019 ENTERPRISE DRIVE TRAFFIC REPORT Newark 10/4/2016 MESOSCOPIC STUDY OF 4 IC ON
ROUTE 237
Sunnyvale 8/8/2019 OAKLEY TS MODS Oakley 10/3/2016
ALAMEDA COUNTY BUILD GRANT Walnut
Creek
8/2/2019 LIVERMORE CAMPUS PARKING AND

TRAFFIC
Livermore 10/3/2016
LESTER PROPERTY TIS Pleasanton 8/2/2019 CASTRO VALLEY DOWNTOWN

SPECIFIC PLAN
Alameda
County
9/29/2016
GRANT APPLICATIONS Dinuba 7/31/2019 PITTSBURG ON-CALL SERVICES Pittsburg 9/28/2016 TRACY HILLS PHASE 2-4 TRAFFIC

STUDIES
Tracy 7/31/2019 SAN BRUNO DEVELOPMENT FEE San Bruno 9/28/2016 840 EL CAMINO REAL South San
Francisco
7/29/2019 PRELIM ENG & ES FOR PORT OF

OAKLAND CIP
Alameda
County
9/27/2016
Main/Center One-Way Conversion Visalia 7/25/2019 TSM SPERRY AVE AT PARK CENTER DR Patterson 9/23/2016

SIGNAL COMM SYS EVAL ALONG

RENGSTORFF AV
Mountain
View
7/25/2019 TAM SYSTEM MONITORING/2017

CMP UPDATE
Marin County 9/23/2016

CARIBBEAN TRAF SIGNAL STUDY

ALONG MATHILDA
Sunnyvale 7/25/2019 TRAFFIC CONTROL - SERRAMONTE
BLVD
Colma 9/21/2016
VALERO GAS STATION TH PLANS Mountain
View
7/19/2019 FREMONT TECH CENTER TRAFFIC
STUDY
Fremont 9/21/2016
COMPREHENSIVE MODAL PLAN Mountain
View
7/12/2019 HOLLISTER AVE COMPLETE ST

CORRIDOR PLAN
Goleta 9/20/2016
4 INTERCHANGES STUDY ALONG SR237Sunnyvale 7/11/2019 CROWS LANDING CORRIDOR Stanislaus County
9/15/2016
2000 Crow Canyon Pl Parking Follow
Up
San Ramon 7/10/2019 RALSTON CORRIDOR IMPR PROJECT
SEGMENT 1&2
Belmont 9/14/2016

ON-CALL TRANSPORTATION ENG

SERVICES
Contra Costa
County
7/9/2019 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR OLD

BLACKHAWK ROAD
Danville 9/14/2016
Sunnyvale Traffic Signal Upgrades Sunnyvale 7/9/2019 4150 POINT EDEN WAY TRAFFIC STUDY
Hayward 9/13/2016
HAMLIN COURT CROSSWALK Santa Clara
County
7/9/2019 SENIOR CARE CENTER Livermore 9/13/2016
Windsor Town Green Hotel Parking
Study
Windsor 7/9/2019 ON-CALL SERVICES Orinda 9/12/2016
Verano Hotel & Affordable Housing
TIS
Sonoma
County
7/8/2019 TRI DELTA TRANSIT HUB TIS Anaheim 9/7/2016
Church of the Nazarene Preschool TIS San Jose 7/7/2019 RUSSIAN RIVER BREWING COMPANY Windsor 8/31/2016

DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ON-CALL

SERVICES
Sunnyvale 7/2/2019 PAINTING WITH A TWIST PARKING

ANALYSIS
Pleasant Hill 8/30/2016

TRU BY HILTON FOCUSED TRAFFIC
STUDY
Manteca 7/2/2019 245 S. SPRUCE TRAFFIC COUNTS South San Francisco
8/30/2016
CONCORD ON-CALL 2019 Concord 6/27/2019 BART SVBX SIO ANALYSIS Dublin 8/29/2016 17-41 Stierlin Rd Modifications Mountain
View
6/27/2019 ELLIS TRAFFIC SERVICES Tracy 8/29/2016
TSM & SS VALPICO-GLENBRIAR Tracy 6/27/2019 HOME2 SUITES Milpitas 8/24/2016 3801 MLK TRIP GENERATION STUDY Oakland 6/26/2019 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1950 LEGHORN STREET
Mountain
View
8/24/2016
DINUBA BUILD GRANT 2019 Dinuba 6/21/2019 MAGIC DAYS DAYCARE TRAFFIC STUDY
Alameda
County
8/22/2016

SEEFRIED - CHRISMAN AT GLR

REALIGNMENT
Tracy 6/20/2019 ALDEN GLEN AT 11TH STREET TSM Tracy 8/17/2016 Hwy 225 Bike Path St Lighting Design Humboldt
County
6/18/2019 UNIV XWALK IMP & EL MONTE

XWALK GAP
Los Altos 8/16/2016
PINOLE SQUARE TIS Pinole 6/12/2019 RRFB EL DORADO LANE Dublin 8/8/2016 OAKLEY GENERAL PLAN Oakley 6/11/2019 SAN CARLOS 380 INDUSTRIAL ROAD San Carlos 8/6/2016 ON-CALL GRANT WRITING Davis 6/7/2019 ROSSMOOR PED SAFETY

EVALUATION
Walnut Creek 8/5/2016
Sunnyvale Sense of Place Sunnyvale 6/6/2019 DANVILLE OFFICE PARTNERS V.

HERITAGE
Danville 8/4/2016

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | A13

DUTTON MEADOWS PEER REVIEW &
TIS
Santa Rosa 6/4/2019 1350 S. ELISEO PARKING STUDY Larkspur 8/3/2016 TSM & SS for 1st St at L St Livermore 6/3/2019 CENTRAL-SUNSET VIEW TSM-PSE Dublin 7/26/2016 Fiber Optic Master Plan San Joaquin
County
5/30/2019 LOS ALTOS HILLS ON-CALL 2016-2017 Los Altos Hills 7/20/2016 Trilogy Traffic Calming Rio Vista 5/22/2019 3001 ECR Mixed-Use IS-MND Palo Alto 7/19/2016 2449 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Calistoga 5/21/2019 WHHS CIRCULATION

RECOMMENDATIONS
Fremont 7/19/2016
BIKE LANES ON-CALL Fresno 5/20/2019 ROAD SAFETY SIGNS AUDIT Wasco 7/19/2016 430-432 KEARNEY STREET El Cerrito 5/20/2019 TASSAJARA PLAN LINE Dublin 7/15/2016 2ND AND MAIN AMY'S TIS Walnut
Creek
5/17/2019 I-580 & I-205 SIGN REPLACEMENT Tracy 7/15/2016 4001 MIRANDA AVENUE CROSSWALK Palo Alto 5/10/2019 BART D-P GARAGE EXPANSION EIR Dublin 7/12/2016

MIDPEN AFFORDABLE HOUSING

PROJECT
San Mateo 5/9/2019 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE Oakley 7/11/2016

BARDSLEY & MOONEY SIGNAL

MODIFICATION
Tulare 5/7/2019 1625 PLYMOUTH ST COORD STUDY Mountain
View
7/8/2016
ALAMEDA DUNKIN DONUTS TIS Alameda 5/6/2019 CHISIN STREET RESIDENTIAL TIS San Jose 7/8/2016 TERRACES CEQA UPDATE Lafayette 4/29/2019 Bell/Market Pedestrian Improvements Windsor 7/1/2016 598 BRYANT STREET CIRCULATION San
Francisco
4/25/2019 VISALIA, CALDWELL WIDENING Visalia 6/30/2016
APPLE CAMPUS 2 TDM MONITORING
2017-113
Cupertino 4/22/2019 GRANT LINE RD AT GVP & CENTRAL
PSE
San Joaquin
County
6/30/2016

BERKELEY RR CROSSING

SAFETY/QUIET ZONE
Berkeley 4/19/2019 GRANT LINE RD. STUDY San Joaquin
County
6/24/2016

SUMMIT SENIOR LIVING PARKING
STUDY
Tracy 4/19/2019 ARNOLD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Dublin 6/21/2016 DONNELY V STATE OF CALIFORNIA California,
State of
4/17/2019 MAIN ST & CEDAR WAY TSM Milpitas 6/20/2016
450, 474 & 500 Bennett Street Grass Valley 4/17/2019 1629 MAIN STREET TIS UPDATE Redwood City 6/20/2016 VERIZON PARKING Sunnyvale 4/16/2019 DAVITA PARKING STUDIES Long Beach 6/17/2016 101 S JACKSON RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC
STUDY
San Jose 4/11/2019 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ON-CALL San Joaquin County
6/8/2016
PW00836-BARSTOW & PALM SIGNAL
MOD
Fresno 4/9/2019 SIGNAL TIMING PLAN FOR PARKER
PLACE
Berkeley 6/3/2016
401 TAYLOR BLVD RESIDENTIAL TIS Pleasant Hill 4/9/2019 WEST SACRAMENTO BIKE LANE GAP

CLOSURE
West
Sacramento
6/1/2016
SENIOR HOUSING APARTMENTS Oakley 4/8/2019 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 2016 Humboldt County
6/1/2016

SANTA CLARA CK TRAIL EXPANSION

MASTER PL
Santa Clara 4/5/2019 102 POUGHKEEPSIE ROAD San Jose 6/1/2016

CONGESTION MANAGEMENT

PROGRAM
Solano
County
4/4/2019 2016 PASS APPLICATION Albany 5/31/2016

TRAFFIC OPS STUDY GROVE APTS &
AIRBNB
Fremont 4/1/2019 PROPOSED TRUCK PARKING San Joaquin
County
5/31/2016
DOWNTOWN CLOVIS PARKING Clovis 3/29/2019 HOSPITALITY CENTER TIS Livermore 5/27/2016 SELBY LANE SCHOOL SAFETY Atherton 3/28/2019 SAN FRANCISCO PREMIUM OUTLETS

PARKING
Livermore 5/26/2016
THE VINES AT OAKLEY Oakley 3/21/2019 DANVILLE BLVD STRIPING Danville 5/25/2016

DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
TIS
Dublin 3/20/2019 SPRINGHILL SUITES Hayward 5/24/2016
CASTRO VALLEY MEDICAL OFFICES TIS Alameda
County
3/19/2019 SACRAMENTO ST BRIDGE

RECONSTRUCTION TIA
Vallejo 5/22/2016
LIVERMORE WINE COUNTY INN TIS Livermore 3/18/2019 WINDSOR MILL PARKING Windsor 5/20/2016 CM Magnoloia & Richmond Bike/Ped
Imp
Millbrae 3/18/2019 VERANDA SHOPPING CENTER TSM-SS Concord 5/11/2016

CONCORD GALINDO STREET

CORRIDOR PLANNING
MTC 3/13/2019 MERCED PARKING STUDIES Merced 5/10/2016
AFGHAN COMMUNITY CENTER TIS Elk Grove 3/13/2019 1700 N. Main St. Development Walnut Creek 5/2/2016

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | A14
ACACIA TIS IN OAKLEY Oakley 3/7/2019 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION STUDY Bakersfield 4/27/2016

PITTSBURG STONEMAN INT

IMPROVEMENTS
Pittsburg 3/4/2019 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TIS Bakersfield 4/19/2016 17-53 CASTRO BIKE LANE FEASIBILITY Mountain
View
3/4/2019 SS SIG & TALISMAN-MATHILDA

SIGNAL MOD
Sunnyvale 4/19/2016
CITYWIDE MULTIMODAL STUDY Hayward 3/1/2019 OAKLAND 3-STATIONHOUSE SOUTH

TDM PLAN
Oakland 4/18/2016
HILLS V CITY OF FOLSOM Folsom 2/28/2019 ROADRUNNER TRAFFIC FEE STUDY Livermore 4/11/2016 PEER REVIEW OF REDWOOD CITY DEIR Redwood
City
2/28/2019 SUNNYVALE SIGNAL COORDINATION Sunnyvale 4/7/2016

PEER REVIEW FOR SANTA ROSA

DISPENSARY
Santa Rosa 2/22/2019 SAN ANTONIO HOTEL PROJECT Palo Alto 4/6/2016 4475 Cabrillo Highway TIS Pacifica 2/21/2019 2016 ON-CALL SERVICES Palo Alto 4/5/2016 HSIPL-5041 (046) - Joaquin Ave Sig
Mod
San Leandro 2/20/2019 FIRE STATION 14 SACRAMENTO Sacramento 4/1/2016 2ND AND MAIN Walnut
Creek
2/20/2019 CONTINUATION OF ON-CALL

SERVICES
Oakley 4/1/2016
HSIPL-5041 (047) - 144th Ave Hawk
Signal
San Leandro 2/20/2019 OAKLAND 2 ICEHOUSE TDM PLAN Oakland 3/25/2016 1896 CAMINO RAMON DAYCARE TIS Danville 2/19/2019 WARM SPRINGS BART PS&E TS & TSM
Gilroy 3/24/2016
GREENVILLE RD FEDEX TSM-TS-SS Livermore 2/18/2019 RESTRIPING MIDDLEFIELD ROAD Palo Alto 3/24/2016 NASH ROAD QUARRY RECLAMATION Hollister 2/13/2019 VERANDA SHOPPING CENTER TIS

AND TDM PLAN
Concord 3/23/2016
LIVERMORE ON-CALL 2019-2021 Livermore 2/8/2019 SHORELINE AT MOUNTAIN VIEW

MASTER PLAN
Mountain
View
3/23/2016
WASTE MANAGEMENT STUDY Chico 2/6/2019 SOLEDAD MOBILITY OPTIMIZATION STUDY
Soledad 3/16/2016
SOLAR4AMERICA ICE RINK

EXPANSION
San Jose 2/6/2019 MVCC SIG AND LELAND-RENGSTORFF

SIGNAL MOD
Mountain
View
3/14/2016
BEATTY PROPERTY STUDY MidPeninsula 1/31/2019 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR CARONDELET

FACILITY
Walnut Creek 3/11/2016

SUNNYVALE HOMESTEAD HIGH BIKE

AND PED
Sunnyvale 1/30/2019 CITY OF CERES - TIMING SHEET Ceres 3/8/2016

RRFB HORIZON PKWY-DON BIDDLE
PARK
Dublin 1/29/2019 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MATHILDA AVE &

INDIO WAY
Sunnyvale 3/7/2016
TSM & SS for Empire Rd at Wicklow
WY
Brentwood 1/29/2019 WYNGATE TRAFFIC CALMING San Ramon 3/1/2016 SR 233/CHOWCHILLA MULTIMODAL Madera
County
1/28/2019 DUBLIN CROSSING Dublin 2/29/2016
SR 233/CHOWCHILLA MULTIMODAL Chowchilla 1/28/2019 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR ROYAL DAY

CARE CENTER
Hayward 2/24/2016

DEVELOPMENT OF ACTIVITY-BASED

MODEL COMP
Tulare
County
1/28/2019 25 ORINDA WAY TRAFFIC STUDY Orinda 2/22/2016
PITTSBURG GENERAL PLAN Pittsburg 1/24/2019 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR REPUBLIC

SQUARE PLAN
Livermore 2/22/2016
Shadelands Master Plan Walnut
Creek
1/24/2019 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR 1390 KLOSE WAY Richmond 2/19/2016 SEEFRIED TRACY Tracy 1/24/2019 PLEASANT HILL CHILDCARE AT 409

BOYD ROAD
Pleasant Hill 2/18/2016
SOUTHSIDE ROAD SS PLANS San Joaquin
County
1/21/2019 CENTRAL AVENUE OVERPASS Newark 2/16/2016
73 CAMARITAS AVENUE TIS South San
Francisco
1/15/2019 NEWELL BRIDGE - SUPPLEMENTAL
STUDY
Palo Alto 2/11/2016

TRAFFIC OP ALONG MTN HOUSE
PKWY
Tracy 1/11/2019 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS STORE TIA Los Banos 2/11/2016 AIRPORT WAY AWSC WARRANT Manteca 1/10/2019 MTN VIEW GRANT/MARTENS INT

IMPROVEMENTS
Mountain
View
2/8/2016

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | A15
SHILOH MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Windsor 1/8/2019 MOSS BEACH TRAFFIC STUDY San Mateo County
2/6/2016

NORTH BAYSHORE CIRCULATION

FEASIBILITY
Mountain
View
1/7/2019 PARKING STUDY AT 2000 CROW

CANYON PLACE
San Ramon 2/5/2016
18-68 GRANT & SLEEPER STUDY Mountain
View
1/4/2019 LOS ALTOS HILLS ON-CALL 2016 Los Altos Hills 2/4/2016

MOUNTAIN VIEW TOC FEASIBILITY
STUDY
Mountain
View
1/4/2019 COMPASS 2016 MODELING ON-CALL Idaho, State of 2/4/2016 701 West Evelyn Avenue TIA Mountain
View
12/13/2018 DESIGN FOR TRACT 3764 - CORRAL

HOLLOW RD
Tracy 2/3/2016
ALL-WAY STOP WARRANT ANALYSIS Mountain
View
12/13/2018 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR 7-11 Oakley 2/3/2016
PHASE 1K TS-SS Tracy 12/12/2018 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR 7-11 Oakley 2/3/2016 690 VETERANS BOULEVARD Redwood
City
12/11/2018 MINER AVE COMPLETE STREETS

PROJECT
Stockton 2/2/2016

FRANCISCO EAST SIDEWALK

IMPROVEMENT
San Rafael 12/11/2018 DESIGN FOR BYRON RD AT GREAT

VALLEY PKWY
San Joaquin
County
1/29/2016

GREAT VALLEY & CENTRAL PKWY

EXTENSION
San Joaquin
County
12/10/2018 SEASIDE GENERAL PLAN Seaside 1/28/2016

SAN LUIS MITIGATION

IMPLEMENTATION CONSI
San Luis
Obispo
12/8/2018 QUARRY RD IMPROVEMENTS, PALO
ALTO
Sunnyvale 1/28/2016
MISSION BLVD AUTO ZONE Jurupa Valley 11/27/2018 DO NOT USE Sunnyvale 1/28/2016 SITE 300 TRAFFIC ENTRY & EXIT
STUDY
Livermore 11/20/2018 VRF GRANT APPLICATION FOR ITS

PROJECTS
Sunnyvale 1/27/2016
RICHMOND PKWY TSM-SS PLANS Richmond 11/13/2018 DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT

PROJECT
Oakley 1/26/2016
MINER AVENUE COMPLETE ST PS&E Stockton 11/12/2018 OAKLEY ON-CALL Oakley 1/26/2016 RIGGIN AVE AND ROAD 76 SIGNAL
PS&E
Tulare
County
11/7/2018 PROJECT METRO TRAFFIC STUDY Sacramento
County
1/13/2016
3011 SANTA ROSA AVE TRIP GEN
STUDY
Santa Rosa 11/7/2018 PROJECT METRO TRAFFIC STUDY Sacramento County
1/13/2016
IPC PHASES G & J Tracy 11/2/2018 BURLINGAME PARKING STUDY Burlingame 1/13/2016 JACK LONDON TRAFFIC SIGNALS Livermore 11/1/2018 ARBOR AVENUE AND STRIPING Tracy 1/12/2016 CENTRAL PARKWAY RRFB AT MIDBLOCKSan Joaquin
County
11/1/2018 TOWN CENTER TRAFFIC STUDY San Joaquin
County
1/11/2016
CENTRAL PKWY PHASE 1 & 2 PLANS San Joaquin
County
11/1/2018 CORRIDOR STUDY ALONG PLEASANT

HILL ROAD
Lafayette 1/8/2016

ON-CALL SERVICES FOR TRANSP IMP

STUDIES
Windsor 10/29/2018 CYPRESS PRESERVE Oakley 1/8/2016
FOLSOM ENG & SPEED SURVEY Folsom 10/29/2018 EXPERT WITNESS CULP V. SAN RAMON
San Ramon 1/8/2016
THE VILLAGE AT MAIN TIS Oakley 10/29/2018 MANTECA LIFESTYLE ACCESS Manteca 1/7/2016 I-880 INT IMPROV (WINTON AVE/A
ST)
Alameda
County
10/26/2018 FOOTHILL CROSSING SHOPPING

CENTER TIS
Los Altos 1/7/2016

LAPC-COUNTYWIDE SIGN INVENTORY
PLAN
Lake County 10/24/2018 DEL MONTE SITE SIGNALS Alameda 1/5/2016 99W AND S. MAIN ST

RECONSTRUCTION
Tehama
County
10/23/2018 CASINO 580 PARKING STUDY Livermore 1/5/2016

PERALTA DEVELOPMENT SIGNAL
PS&E
Fremont 10/22/2018 375 WEST EL PINTADO EIR Danville 1/4/2016

17.M

On Call Engineering Services | B
Appendix B
Resumes

17.M

TJKM | VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY
Planning  Engineering  ITS  Parking  Operations  Complete Streets California | Florida | Texas

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
 Transportation Planning
 Traffic Impact Studies
 Transportation Management Plans
 Traffic Operations
 Transit Priority
 Freeway & Arterial Management
Studies
1BYEARS OF EXPERIENCE
32 REGISTRATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS
CA TR 2290 (Traffic)

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
TJKM 2012–Present
URS 2004-2012
Bucher, Willis & Ratliff 2001-2003
TJKM 1996-2000
VK Patel 1990-1994

EDUCATION
M.S., Civil Engineering, San Jose State
University, San Jose, CA
B.S., Civil Engineering, Saurashtra
University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
Project Experience
On-Call Traffic/Transportation
Engineering Services
 Technical Transportation Planning,
Modeling & Air Quality Planning &
Conformity Analysis On-Call
Services, Madera County
 SNABM On-Call Land-Use,
Transportation, & Socioeconomic
Modeling & Forecasting Services,
Solano & Napa Counties
 Caltrans Statewide Modeling OnCall
 Cities of Belmont, Brentwood,
Dublin, Fresno, Millbrae, Oakley,
Orinda, Palo Alto, Redwood City,
San Bruno, San Luis Obispo, San
Carlos, Santa Clara, Sunnyvale,
Tracy, Walnut Creek, & Vallejo
 Counties of Fresno, San Joaquin,
San Mateo, San Luis Obispo, Santa
Clara, & Yolo
Bicycle & Pedestrian/Safe Routes to
School
 Pedestrian & Bicyclist Safety &
Connectivity Study, Dinuba
 Rossmoor Pedestrian Safety
Evaluation, Walnut Creek
 Comprehensive Pedestrian & Bicycle
Master Plan, Belmont
 Bike Safety Study, Atherton
 Citywide Multimodal Improvement
Plan, Mountain View
 Sequencing I-80 & SR 65
Transportation Improvements,
Placer County
Corridor Studies/Complete Streets
 SR 156 Multimodal Enhancement
Study, San Benito County
 Park Marina Drive Corridor Plan,
Redding
 Bascom Corridor Complete Streets
Study, Santa Clara County
 Eureka North-South Multimodal
Corridor Study, Eureka
 Hollister Avenue Complete Streets
Study, Goleta
 San Benito Street Corridor Study,
Hollister
Traffic Signal Designs
 HSIP Traffic Signal Improvement
Project, Pittsburg
 HSIP Various Signalized Intersection
Safety Improvements, Citrus Heights
 Traffic Signal Update HSIP, Manteca
 Ralston Avenue Corridor
Improvements – Segments 1 & 2,
Belmont
 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade
Project, Hayward
 Three HSIP Projects for West Leland
Corridor Safety Improvements,
Pittsburg
Traffic Operations
 Safe Routes to School Project, Dixon
 Livorna/Wilson Road Traffic
Operations Study, Danville
 Pitt School Road Traffic Operations
Study, Dixon
 Traffic Calming Study at Mineta San
Jose International Airport, San Jose
Mr. Amin has 32 years of both public and private sector experience in the areas of transportation planning, traffic impact studies, transportation management plans, construction scheduling, construction area signs, signing and striping, traffic signal coordination, traffic operations, transit priority, traffic signal systems, freeway and arterial management studies, and intelligent transportation systems planning, design and construction oversight. He specializes in macro and microscopic model development and application for analysis of impacts across all modes of transportation. His projects range from traffic studies for developments, specific plans, general plans, corridor studies, and area-wide studies to long-term planning studies. Studies also include multimodal operations, light-rail, bus rapid transit, pedestrian, bicyclists and traffic safety and operations.

Nayan Amin, TE

PRESIDENT
Project Role: Principal-In-Charge & QA/QC

17.M

TJK
TJKM | VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY | Nayan Amin, TE 2 Traffic Control Device Inventory & GIS
Inventory Projects
 Regulatory & Warning Sign
Retroreflectivity Survey & Inventory,
Eureka
 Road Safety Sign Audit, Wasco
 City Sign Condition Evaluation &
Reporting, Morgan Hill
 I-80/San Pablo Dam Road
Interchange Corridor Study, Contra
Costa County
 US 101/Broadway Interchange
Corridor Project, San Mateo County
 US 101 HOV Lane Widening
(Segment A), Sonoma, County
Traffic Impact Studies/EIRs
 Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for Hotel
Development at 701 Third Street,
San Francisco
 2670 Geary Boulevard TIS, San
Francisco
 1800 San Pablo Avenue TIA Update,
Oakland
 Second & Walpert Residential TIS,
Hayward
 Residential Development at Maybell
Avenue TIS, Palo Alto
Signal Coordination
 Signal Synchronization, Dinuba
 SR 29 Signal Phasing & Timing
Evaluation, Napa
 MTC PASS 2018-2019 Cycle,
Fairfield
 SR 238 Improvement, Hayward
 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade
Project, Hayward
Truck Route Studies
 Truck Restriction Plan Development,
South San Francisco
Traffic Impact Fee (AB 1600) Studies
 Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Study 2018
Update, Windsor
 Greater Eureka TIF Study, Humboldt
County
 TIF Study, Visalia
 Regional TIF Update, Merced
County
Transit
 Tulare CAG Long Range Transit Plan,
Tulare County
 County Connection Transit Access
Improvement, Contra Costa County
 Bus Stop Improvement Plan, San
Benito County
Plans, Specifications & Estimates
 US 101 HOV Lane Widening
(Segment A, B, & B2), Sonoma
County
 I-680 Southbound Express Lane
Project, Alameda County
 US 101 Auxiliary Lane Project, Santa
Clara County
 SR 4 HOV Lane Widening Project,
Contra Costa County
 Almaden Expressway TOS Design,
Santa Clara County
Freeway Operations
 I-580/Mountain House Parkway
Project Study Report, San Joaquin
County
 I-680 Southbound Express Lane
Project, Alameda County
 I-80/San Pablo Dam Road
Interchange Corridor Study, Contra
Costa County
 I-580 Eastbound & Westbound
Express Lanes (Single & Double)
Corridor Study, Alameda County
Design Build
 SR 22 HOV Lane Design-Build
Project, Orange County
Speed Zone Studies
 Engineering & Traffic Surveys for
Speed Zones, Palm Desert
 2014 Speed Zone Studies, Antioch
 Santa Clara Valley Transportation
Authority Light Rail System Analysis,
Santa Clara County
Transportation Planning
 ConnectMenlo General Plan &
Facebook Campus Planning, Menlo
Park
 AIM Parking & Traffic Circulation
Study, Marin County
 2040 General Plan & Environmental
Impact Report, Seaside
 Expo Design/Best Buy Development,
Santa Clara County
Traffic Calming
 Neighborhood Traffic Calming
Program, Millbrae
 Neighborhood Traffic Calming
Program & Complete Streets Policy,
Dinuba
 Traffic Calming in the Lyon-Hoag
Neighborhood & Vicinity,
Burlingame
 Neighborhood Traffic Calming
Program, Hayward
Intelligent Transportation Systems
 AC Transit Line 97 South County
Corridors Transit Performance
Initiative Project Adaptive Traffic
Control System
 Preliminary Engineering &
Environmental Services for the Port
of Oakland CIP Projects, Oakland
Parking Studies
 Updated Parking Regulations,
Grover Beach
 Jackson-Webster Parking Study,
Fairfield
 Downtown Parking Study, Clovis
 Downtown Parking & Circulation
Study, Avila Beach
 Downtown Parking Management
Plan, Brentwood
Safety Studies
 Citywide Intersection Safety Study,
San Bruno
 Crow Canyon Road Safety Study,
Alameda County
 Patterson Pass Road Safety Study,
Alameda County
Local Road Safety Plan/Systemic Safety
Analysis Report Program
 SSAR, San Luis Obispo County
 LRSP, City of Folsom
 LRSP, Culver City
 SSAR, City of Pittsburg
 LRSP & SSAR, City of Dinuba
Congestion Management Programs &
Traffic Monitoring Studies
 2020-2021 TAM System Monitoring
& CMP Update, Marin County
 2018-2019 TAM System Monitoring
& CMP Update, Marin County
Travel Demand Modeling
 NCTC/Grass Valley Travel Demand
Forecasting Model
 Travel Demand Model 2018 Update,
Sonoma County

17.M

TJKM | VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY
Planning  Engineering  ITS  Parking  Operations  Complete Streets California | Florida | Texas
 Transportation Studies/Analysis for
Developments
 Traffic Circulation
 Roadway Safety & Complete Street
 Highway Geometric Design
 Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety
Improvements
 Intersection Geometric Design
 Traffic Signal Design
 Parking Lot Design & Parking
Structure Circulation & Striping
1BYEARS OF EXPERIENCE
35 REGISTRATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS
CA TE TR 2237
CA CE C 48249

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
TJKM 2020-Present
City/County Agencies 1987-2020
University of Newcastle 1983-1985
2BEDUCATION
M.S. Transportation Engineering San
Jose State University, San Jose, CA
M.S. Civil Engineering Hydraulics
University of Newcastle upon Tyne,
UK
B.S. Civil Engineering Kabul University
Project Experience
On-Call Traffic/Transportation
Engineering Services
 City of Concord
 City of San Bruno-Staff
Augmentation
 Town of Los Gatos-Staff
Augmentation
 City of South San Francisco
 City of Oxnard
 City of Atwater
Traffic Signals
 Design of High-Intensity Activated
crosswalk (HAWK) Signal and
Minor Concrete Improvements at
6500 Monterey Road, Gilroy
 Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP) Citywide Traffic
Signal Hardware Upgrade,
Concord
 HSIP Traffic Signal Improvement
Project, Pittsburg
 North Shoreline Boulevard
Adaptive Traffic Signal, Mountain
View
 Grant Road Traffic Adaptive Signal
System, Mountain View
 Traffic Signal Design for North
Shoreline Boulevard & Crittenden
Lane, Castro Street & Miramonte
Avenue, Mountain View
Site Specific Transportation Analysis
 Google, Mountain View
 Microsoft, Mountain View
General Plan & Precise Plans
 General Plan Update, North
Bayshore, El Camino Real, & San
Antonio Precise Plans, Mountain
View
Traffic Circulations
 San Antonio Development,
Mountain View
 Rivermark Project, Santa Clara
Traffic Circulations
 San Antonio Development,
Mountain View
 Rivermark Project, Santa Clara
Multimodal
 Citywide Multimodal Improvement
Plan, Mountain View
 Traffic Calming Program, San
Bruno
Traffic Impact Fee
 City of Santa Clara Traffic Impact
Fee, Santa Clara
 City of Mountain View Traffic
Impact Fee, Mountain View

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Mr. Fakhry has over 35 years of experience in civil and transportation engineering working for public sector. He has worked in different capacities for the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, City of Santa Clara and City of Mountain View. His last position was in the City Mountain View where he worked as City Traffic Engineer.

His experience is in highway design, transportation/traffic studies, signal design, land development reviews, pedestrian and bike improvements and complete street projects. He has worked closely with neighborhood groups, City Council, and Council Committees and Sub-committees. He also taught as adjunct professor at San Jose State University for over 17 years.

Sayed Fakhry, PE, TE

QUALITY ASSURANCE & QUALITY CONTROL MANAGER
Project Role: Project Manager

17.M

letTJK
TJKM | VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY | Sayed Fakhry, PE, TE 2 Roadway Safety/Complete Streets
 Castro Street Complete Street
Project, Mountain View
Neighborhood Traffic Management
 City of San Bruno Traffic Calming,
San Bruno
 City of Concord Traffic Calming,
Concord
 Neighborhood Traffic
Management for Various
Residential & Collector Streets,
Mountain View
Safe Routes to School
 Pomeroy Avenue, Benton Street to
Calabazas Boulevard, Santa Clara
Highway Geometric Design
 Laguna Canyon Road, Orange
County
 Relocation of State Route 71,
Riverside County & Orange County
Traffic Control Plans
 Various Projects, Santa Clara
 Various Projects, Mountain View
 Various Projects, San Bruno
 Various Projects, Los Gatos
Pavement Delineations
 Various Projects, San Bruno
 Various Projects, Santa Clara
 Various Projects, Mountain View
 PCH, Laguna Canyon Road,
Orange County
Construction Traffic Control Plans
 Laguna Canyon Road Relocation,
Orange County
 State Route 71 Relocation,
Riverside County
 Various Streets, Santa Clara
 Various Streets, Mountain View
 Various Streets, San Bruno
Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety
Improvements
 Shoreline Cycle Track, Mountain
View
 Shoreline Boulevard, Mountain
View
 Pomeroy Avenue, Santa Clara
Intersection Geometric Design
 State Route 71 Relocation,
Riverside County
 Laguna Canyon Road Relocation,
Orange County
Traffic Signal Design
 Castro Street & Miramonte
Avenue, Mountain View
 North Shoreline Boulevard &
Crittenden Lane, Mountain View
 Lafayette Street & Calle De
Primavera, Santa Clara
 De La Cruz Boulevard &
Greenwood Drive, Santa Clara
Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter, Drainage &
Roadway Widening Improvements
 Berryessa Adobe, Santa Clara
 Pomeroy Safe Routes to School
Improvements, Santa Clara
 North Tustin, Orange County
 Castro Street Complete Street
Project, Mountain View
Class I Bike Trail
 Green Bike Loop, North Bayshore,
Mountain View
 San Thomas Aquino Creek Trail
Segment I & II, Santa Clara
Parking Lots
 Downtown Parking Lots, Mountain
View
 San Tomas Aquino Creek Trail
Parking Lot, Santa Clara
 Central Library Parking Lot, Santa
Clara
 City Hall/Warburton Museum
Parking Lot Lighting Project, Santa
Clara
Local Roadway Safety Plan
 City of San Bruno
 City of Cupertino
 City of Millbrae
 City of Pinole
 City of Napa
 County of Santa Clara
 City of Williams
 City of Isleton
 County of Kern
 County of Mendocino
 City of Glendale
 City of Folsom
 City of Culver City
 City of Antioch
 County of Yuba
 City of Coalinga
 City of Yorba Linda
 County of Solano
 City of Farmersville,
 City of Chowchilla
 City of Pittsburg
 County of Kern

17.M

TJKM | VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY
Planning  Engineering  ITS  Parking  Operations  Complete Streets California | Florida | Texas
‐
 Stakeholder Engagement
 Government & Community
Relations
 Urban & Community Design, &
Long Range Planning
 Parking Management Studies
 Wayfinding Signage
 Historic Preservation
 Economic Development
 Code Drafting, Review &
Interpretation
 Historic Research & Writing
1BYEARS OF EXPERIENCE
16 PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
TJKM 2021 – Present
City of McKinney, Texas 2019 – 2021
City of Dallas, Texas 2006-2019
2BEDUCATION
B.A., Architecture, Texas Tech
University, Lubbock, TX
Project Experience
Local Roadway Safety Plan
 Local Roadway Safety Plan,
Pittsburg
 Local Roadway Safety Plan, San
Bruno
 Local Roadway Safety Plan, Albany
 Local Roadway Safety Plan, Kern
County
Stakeholder Engagement,
Government, & Community Relations
 Throckmorton Statue Ad Hoc
Advisory Board, McKinney, TX
 Historic Preservation Program &
Landmark Commission, Dallas, TX
Parking Management Studies
 Cupertino Memorial Park,
Cupertino
 Old Town & Downtown Parking
Study, Eureka
 Parking Action Plan, McKinney, TX
Wayfinding Signage
 Wayfinding Signage, McKinney, TX
Impact Fee Studies
 Impact Fee Update, McKinney, TX

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Mr. Doty has over 16 years of experience in both the private and public sector with the majority of that time served as a planner or director for major cities in North Texas.

Mr. Doty is an accomplished senior-level planner and project manager with broad stakeholder, community and government relation expertise, team leadership, strategic development and media outreach experience in the public and private sectors. Among the many initiatives and projects Mark has worked on include; monthly commission and board meetings, stakeholder and other community outreach, parking management, wayfinding signage, impact fee studies, downtown place making, economic development fund review and administration, historic designation, code writing and review.

Mark Doty

SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNER
Project Role: Deputy Project Manager

17.M

TJKM | VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY
Planning  Engineering  ITS  Parking  Operations  Complete Streets California | Florida | Texas

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
 Municipal Traffic Engineering
 Freeway Operations
 Arterial System Planning
 Circulation Studies
 Traffic Impact Studies
 General/Specific Plans
 Parking Studies
 Corridor Studies
 Expert Witness Testimony
 Transportation Planning
 Geometric Design
 Safety Studies
1BYEARS OF EXPERIENCE
62 REGISTRATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS
CA TR0023 (Traffic)
CA C15347 (Civil)

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
TJKM 1974 - Present
Lampman & Associates 1971 - 1974
City of Hayward 1966 - 1971
County of Fresno 1960 - 1965

EDUCATION
M.S., Transportation Engineering,
University of California, Berkeley,
Berkeley, CA
B.S., Civil Engineering, California State
University, Fresno, Fresno, CA
Project Experience
On-Call Traffic/Transportation
Engineering Services
 Cities of Grass Valley, Walnut Creek,
Orinda, San Carlos, Redwood City,
Tracy, Tracy Hills, Dublin – Dublin
Ranch, Patterson, Palo Alto, El
Cerrito
 Mountain House Community
Services District
 Town of Los Gatos
Corridor Studies
 Eureka North-South Multimodal
Corridor Study, Eureka
 Citywide Multimodal Improvement
Study, Hayward
 Citywide Multimodal Improvement
Plan, Mountain View
 Sandia National Laboratories/CA
Traffic Safety Study, Livermore
 Charleston-Arastradero Corridor
Project, Palo Alto
 Webster Street SMART Corridor,
Alameda County
Pedestrian & Bicycle
 Pedestrian & Bicyclist Safety &
Connectivity Study, Dinuba
Traffic Impact Studies
 Quay Valley Traffic Studies, Kings
County
 Proposed Dialysis Center, Alameda
County
 2747 & 3045 Park Boulevard Traffic
Impact Study, Palo Alto
 Mosque Traffic Study, Hayward
 Hotel on Constitution Drive Traffic
Impact Study, Livermore
 Aptos Village Traffic Study Update,
Santa Cruz County
 Mervyn’s Mixed-Use Site Traffic
Impact Study, Hayward
Large-Scale Development Projects
 TDM Plan for the Terraces at San
Joaquin Gardens Senior Residential
Development, Fresno
 Transportation Demand
Management Plan for the Paragon
Retail Outlets, Livermore
 Mountain House Advanced Traffic
Management System, San Joaquin
County
 Crow Canyon Road, Alameda
County
 Patterson Pass Road Project Study
Report (PSR), Alameda County
Parking Studies
 Updated Parking Regulations,
Grover Beach
 Jackson-Webster Parking Study,
Fairfield
 Downtown Parking Study, Clovis
Mr. Kinzel is the Vice President of TJKM and has 62 years of experience in nearly all aspects of traffic engineering and planning. He has managed and performed hundreds of traffic studies over the years. A former municipal engineer, much of his career today is focused on working with city and county traffic engineers to determine the most effective strategies for reducing traffic congestion. He has also worked with many California developers and homebuilders, performing development studies and presenting study results.

Mr. Kinzel has made presentations at hundreds of city council/planning commission/public meetings to present traffic study recommendations, and has taught traffic-engineering courses for the University of California and the University of Santa Clara. He wrote the “Traffic Studies” chapter of the Traffic Engineering Handbook, published by Prentice-Hall, and he assisted ITE with updating their Parking Generation Manual that is now in circulation. Mr. Kinzel also conducted a peer review of the 7th, 8th, and 9th Editions of the ITE Trip Generation Manual.

Chris Kinzel, PE, TE

VICE PRESIDENT
Project Role: Transportation Planning Task Lead

17.M

TJK
TJKM | VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY | Chris Kinzel, PE, TE 2  Downtown Parking & Circulation
Study, Avila Beach
 Downtown Parking Management
Plan, Brentwood
 Downtown Parking Plan, Turlock
 Downtown & Neighborhoods
Parking Study, Orinda
 Downtown Parking Utilization
Study, Danville
 Middlefield Road Comprehensive
Parking Study, San Mateo County
General Plan Projects
 City of Menlo Park
 General Plan Update 2016,
Humboldt County
 2040 General Plan & Environmental
Impact Report, Seaside
 General Plan, Patterson
 General Plan, Soledad
 Circulation Element, Half Moon Bay
 Circulation Element, Pleasant Hill
Circulation Studies
 Charleston-Arastradero Corridor
Improvements, Palo Alto
 River Islands Residential
Development, Lathrop
 Downtown Revitalization Plan,
Pleasanton
 Main Street Corridor
Improvements, Manteca
Traffic Impact Fee (AB 1600) Studies
 Traffic Impact Fee Study 2018
Update, Windsor
 Regional Transportation Impact Fee
Update, Merced County
 Greater Eureka Traffic Impact Fee,
Humboldt County
 Office Traffic Impact Fee Review,
Contra Costa County
 Traffic Impact Fee, Visalia
 Traffic Impact Fee, Pleasanton
 Transportation Infrastructure
Master Plan & Traffic Fee, Patterson
Freeway Operations
 Mountain House Parkway at I-205
PSR, San Joaquin County
 I-580 HOV Lane Traffic Forecasting
& Operations Report, Alameda
County
 Altamont Pass Corridor Study,
Livermore, Tracy & San Joaquin
County
 I-680 Traffic Operations Study,
Contra Costa, Alameda & Santa
Clara Counties
 Alameda County Congestion
Management Agency, Alameda
County
 SR 84 Route Alternatives Study,
Livermore
Transportation Modeling
 Three County Model Base Year
Update, Stanislaus, San Joaquin &
Merced Counties
 Tuolumne County Circulation
System Model, Transportation
Improvement Program, & Funding
Strategy, Tuolumne County
Traffic Control Device Inventory
 Regulatory & Warning Sign
Retroreflectivity Survey & Inventory,
Eureka
 Road Safety Sign Audit, Wasco
 Retroreflectivity Sign, Manteca
 Alameda County TCDI & Sign
Retroreflectivity, Alameda County
 Palo Alto GIS Based TCDI & Sign
Retroreflectivity, Palo Alto
 City of Lakeport
 City of Hillsborough
Signal Coordination
 Metropolitan Transportation
Commission (MTC) Program for
Arterial Signal Synchronization
(PASS), San Francisco Bay Area
 Stoneridge/Santa Rita
Improvements, Pleasanton
 MTC Regional Signal Timing
Program, San Francisco Bay Area
Congestion Management Programs &
Traffic Monitoring Studies
 San Joaquin County Congestion
Management Program (CMP)
Update, 2013-2014 & 2007
 2014-15 CMP Monitoring and
Update efforts for Transportation
Authority of Marin, Marin County
 Measure J Traffic Congestion Relief
Agency (TRAFFIX) 2015 Traffic
Monitoring Analysis – Danville, San
Ramon & Contra Costa County
Speed Zone Studies
 Engineering & Traffic Surveys for
Speed Zones, Palm Desert
 Engineering & Traffic Surveys,
Pleasant Hill
 Engineering & Traffic Surveys,
Folsom
 2017 Engineering & Traffic Surveys,
Hollister
 2015 Engineering & Traffic Survey,
San Bruno
 Citywide Engineering & Traffic
Survey, Millbrae
 2018 Engineering & Traffic Surveys,
Marina
Engineering & Traffic Surveys
 City of San Bruno
 Town of Danville
 City of Hollister
 City of Rio Vista
 City of Menlo Park
 City of Cupertino
 City of Pleasant Hill
 City of Newark
Safety Studies
 Rossmoor Pedestrian Safety
Evaluation, Walnut Creek
 No Passing Zone Study, Fresno
County
 Digital/GIS Crash Analysis Database,
Alameda County, El Cerrito,
Mountain House, Palo Alto,
Patterson, San Joaquin County,
Tracy, & Union City
 Sight Distance Review for New
Development, San Joaquin County
Transit Studies
 Bus Stop Improvement Plan, San
Benito County
Truck Route Studies
 Truck Route Study, Tracy
 Truck Restriction Plan
Development, South San Francisco
 Truck Route Study, Citrus Heights
Traffic Calming
 Neighborhood Traffic Calming
Program & Complete Streets Policy,
Dinuba

17.M

TJKM | VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY
Planning  Engineering  ITS  Parking  Operations  Complete Streets California | Florida | Texas

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
 Signal Coordination
 Project Management
 Traffic Impact Studies
 Freeway Operations
 Traffic Operations
 Traffic Planning
1BYEARS OF EXPERIENCE
23 REGISTRATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS
CA CE 73840 (Civil)
CA TR 2465 (Traffic)
TX CE 135281 (Civil)

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
TJKM 2012-Present
URS 2004-2012
Bucher, Willis & Ratliff 2001-2003
Autodesk 1999-2001

EDUCATION
M.S., Civil Engineering, San Jose State
University, San Jose, CA
B.S., Civil Engineering, Bombay
University, Mumbai, Maharashtra,
India
Project Experience
On-Call Traffic/Transportation
Engineering Services
 County of Napa, San Luis Obispo,
Monterey, San Mateo, Fresno, San
Joaquin, & Santa Clara
 City of San Bruno, Millbrae,
Concord, Pittsburg, Vallejo, Walnut
Creek, Palo Alto, Belmont,
Sunnyvale, Oakley, San Carlos,
Mountain View, Tracy, Fresno,
Oakland, & Santa Clara
 Town of Los Gatos
Corridor Studies/Complete Streets
 Franklin-Beachwood
Interconnectivity Plan, Merced
County
 Franklin-Beachwood
Interconnectivity Plan, Merced
County
 Park Marina Drive Corridor Plan,
Redding
 East Avenue Corridor Plan,
Livermore
 Mission Boulevard Complete
Streets Design Project, Alameda
County
 Bascom Corridor Complete Streets
Study, Santa Clara County
 Ralston Avenue Corridor
Improvements – Segments 1 & 2,
Belmont
Bicycle & Pedestrian/Safe Routes to
School
 Leigh High School Safety Analysis,
San Jose
 Bike Lane Gap Closure Level of
Effort (On-Call Task Order 1),
South San Francisco
 Pedestrian & Bicyclist Safety &
Connectivity Study, Dinuba
 RRFB Installation Pedestrian Safety
Project, Manteca
 Rossmoor Pedestrian Safety
Evaluation, Walnut Creek
 Safe Routes to School 2015,
Sunnyvale
 Bike Safety Study, Atherton
 Comprehensive Pedestrian &
Bicycle Master Plan, Belmont
 Marin-Curtis Safe Routes to School
Pedestrian Improvements, Albany
Congestion Management Programs
& Traffic Monitoring Studies
 Congestion Management Plan
Update, Solano County
 2020-2021 TAM System
Monitoring & CMP Update, Marin
County
 2018-2019 TAM System
Monitoring & CMP Update, Marin
County
 2016-2017 TAM System
Monitoring & CMP Update, Marin
County
Traffic Control Device Inventory &
GIS Inventory Projects
 Retroreflectivity Sign Project,
Manteca
 Alameda County TCDI & Sign
Retroreflectivity, Alameda County
 Palo Alto GIS Based TCDI & Sign
Retroreflectivity, Palo Alto
 Hillsborough TCDI, Hillsborough
Ms. Jariwala has 23 years of professional experience in the areas of traffic operations, transportation planning, freeway and arterial management studies, signal coordination, traffic signal systems, traffic impact studies/EIRs and intelligent transportation systems planning, design and construction oversight. She has extensive experience in macro and microscopic model development and application for analysis of traffic operations for express lane studies as well as multimodal operations, light-rail, bus rapid transit, pedestrian, bicyclists, and traffic safety studies.

Ruta Jariwala, PE, TE

PRINCIPAL
Project Role: Traffic Operations / Studies Task Lead

17.M

TJK
TJKM | VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY | Ruta Jariwala, PE, TE 2  SR 4 HOV Lane Widening Project,
Contra Costa County
 US 101 HOV Lane Widening
(Segment A) Project, Sonoma
County
Traffic Impact Studies/EIRs
 Calaveras Boulevard Near-Term
Improvements, Santa Clara County
 Fruitvale Avenue Traffic Study,
Oakland
 2747 & 3045 Park Boulevard Traffic
Impact Study, Palo Alto
 2492 Whipple Road Traffic Impact
Study, Hayward
 Self-Storage Facility Traffic Impact
Analysis, Milpitas
 Hotel Traffic Impact Study on San
Pablo Dam Road, San Pablo
 Aptos Village Traffic Study Update,
Santa Cruz County
Freeway Operations
 I-580 Eastbound Express Lane
Project, Alameda County
 I-580 Westbound Express Lane
Traffic & Revenue Study, Alameda
County
 Mid-County Project Study Report,
Stanislaus County
Signal Coordination
 Tully Road & Saratoga Avenue
Adaptive Signal Control Evaluation,
San Jose
 West Leland Road Signal
Coordination, Pittsburg
 SR 29 Signal Phasing & Timing
Evaluation, Napa
 Railroad Avenue-Kirker Pass Road
Signal Coordination, Pittsburg
 Signal Coordination Timing &
Optimization Project, Sunnyvale
 Hilltop Drive Signal Coordination
Project, Redding
Traffic Operations
 Citywide Traffic Model, Oakley
 I-80/Gilman Street Interchange
PA/ED Project, Alameda County
 Sperry Avenue at I-5 Interchange,
Stanislaus County
 I-580/Mountain House Parkway
Project Study Report, San Joaquin
County
 I-80/San Pablo Dam Road
Interchange Project, Contra Costa
County
Traffic Signal Designs
 HSIP Citywide Traffic Signal
Hardware Upgrade, Concord
 HSIP Traffic Signal Improvement
Project, Pittsburg
 Signal Inventory San Pablo Dam
Road, Contra Costa County
 Mathilda Fiber Inventory,
Sunnyvale
 Traffic Signal Update Project HSIP,
Manteca
 Mathilda/Indio Intersection
Improvements, Sunnyvale
Traffic Planning
 Golden State Boulevard/Golf
Road/Berkeley Avenue
Intersection Improvement,
Stanislaus
 I-80/Gilman Street Interchange
PA/ED Project, Alameda County
 I-580/Mountain House Parkway
Project Study Report, San Joaquin
County
 I-80 San Pablo Dam Road
Interchange Project, Contra Costa
County
Plans, Specifications & Estimates
 US 101 HOV Lane Widening
Project (Segment A, B, & B2),
Sonoma County
 I-680 Southbound Express Lane
Project, Alameda County
 SR 85/US 101 Expressway Lanes
Project, Santa Clara County
 SR 4 HOV Lane Widening Project,
Contra Costa County
Speed Zone Studies
 2015 Engineering & Traffic Survey,
San Bruno
 Antioch 2014 Speed Zone Studies,
Antioch
Parking
 Parking In-Lieu Fee Study,
Redwood City
 AIM Parking & Traffic Circulation
Study, Marin County
 Downtown Parking Utilization
Assessment, Danville
Traffic Impact Fee
 Visalia Traffic Impact Fee Study,
Visalia
 Office Traffic Impact Fee Review,
Contra Costa County
 Regional Transportation Impact
Fee Update, Merced County
 Greater Eureka Traffic Impact Fee
Study, Humboldt County
Traffic Calming
 Neighborhood Traffic Calming
Program, Millbrae
 Neighborhood Traffic Calming
Program & Complete Streets
Policy, Dinuba
 Traffic Calming in the Lyon-Hoag
Neighborhood & Vicinity,
Burlingame
 Stanford Neighborhood Streets
Enhancement Project, Redwood
City
Safety Studies
 Tesla Road Project Safety Study,
Alameda County
 Crow Canyon Road Safety Study,
Alameda County
 Patterson Pass Road Safety Study,
Alameda County
Local Roadway Safety Plan
 Cities of San Bruno, Cupertino,
Isleton, Dinuba
 Countywide Local Roads Safety
Plan, Santa Clara County
 Kern Council of Governments
 Mendocino Council of
Governments
Systemic Safety Analysis Report
Program
 Cities of Yuba City, Pittsburg,
Dinuba
 County of Yuba
 County of Del Norte
 County of San Luis Obispo
Active Transportation Plans
 Citywide Active Transportation
Plan, Patterson
 Active Transportation Plan, Scotts
Valley
Transit
 West Grand Transit Signal Priority
Implementation, Alameda County

17.M

TJKM | VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY
Planning  Engineering  ITS  Parking  Operations  Complete Streets California | Florida | Texas

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
 Travel Demand Modeling
 Transportation Planning
 Project Management
1BYEARS OF EXPERIENCE
25 2BPROFESSIONAL HISTORY

TJKM 2018-Present
Transportation Planning & Research,
Mumbai 2007-2012
Citilabs, India 2008-2013
Cambridge Systematics 2000-2008
KPMG LLP, Washington 1998-2000
Washington Government 1997-1998
2BEDUCATION
M.S., Transportation Planning &
Engineering, University of
Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
B.E., Civil Engineering, Osmania
University, Hyderabad, Telangana,
India
Project Experience
Travel Demand Modeling
 Napa County Vehicle Miles
Traveled Analysis, Napa County
 Technical Transportation Planning,
Modeling & Air Quality Planning &
Conformity Analysis On-Call
Services, Madera County
 I-80 Corridor Comprehensive
Multimodal Corridor Plan Study,
Solano County
 Three County Model Base Year
Update, Stanislaus, San Joaquin &
Merced Counties
 Development Activity-Based
Model, Tulare County
 2016 Travel Model Update, San
Joaquin, Merced Counties
 SNABM On-Call Land-Use,
Transportation, & Socioeconomic
Modeling & Forecasting Services,
Solano & Napa Counties
 Travel Demand Model 2018
Update, Sonoma County
 Caltrans Statewide On-Call
Modeling Support
 Cebu Bus Rapid Transport
Ridership & Feasibility Analysis,
Cebu, Philippines
 Travel Demand Modeling Update,
Nevada County
 Atwater-Merced Expressway
Study, Merced County
 Napa Comprehensive
Transportation Plan, Napa County
 Traffic Operations & Forecasting
for I-880/Winton Ave & A Street,
Hayward
 California Statewide Travel
Demand Model Development &
High Speed Rail Ridership
Forecasting Study
 San Joaquin Goods Movement
Study Phase III
 Caltrain Commuter Rail Ridership
& Revenue Analysis
 San Francisco Trans-Bay Ridership
Analysis
 Contra Costa County Travel
Demand Model Development
 United Nations Development
Program (UNDP)
 Los Angeles CARGO Multimodal
Freight Model
 San Francisco Tour Based Travel
Model
 Ports of Long Beach & Los Angeles
Model Development
 Multimodal Statewide Freight
Model for Kansas, USA
 Toll and Revenue Analysis for
Gerald Desmond Bridge/I710, Port
of Long Beach
Ms. Modugula has 25 years of experience in leading transportation planning firms in the United States and India in the field of travel forecasting models. She is an expert in passenger and freight travel demand forecasting models, mobility plans, master plans, demand assessment, and public transport feasibility projects. She has extensive experience in California travel models including those of 9-County MTC, San Francisco, Alameda, Contra Costa, Santa Clara, Napa, Solano, Marin, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced, Madera and Monterrey counties. She is an expert in CUBE, TransCAD, and EMME software and has conducted numerous training sessions in model development and Cube software. She has worked on several international public transport projects in countries such as India, Sri Lanka, Philippines, Turkey and Kenya. She is currently updating the models of Solano, Napa, San Joaquin, Stanislaus and Merced travel models to improve highway and transit validation. She has a Master’s degree from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Vamsee Modugula

DIRECTOR OF TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING
Project Role: Traffic Modeling Task Lead

17.M

TJKM | VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY | Vamsee Modugula 2 TJK  Contra Costa Transportation
Authority (CCTA) Model Support &
Maintenance
 Multimodal Statewide Freight
Model, Kansas
 Development of an Inter-city
Passenger & Freight Demand
Model to develop a 50-Year
National Transport Master Plan for
Kenya
 Railway Master Plan for Sri Lanka,
Colombo
 Turkish Logistics Masterplan
 Bus Planning Guidebook & Toolkit,
Mumbai, India
 Asian Development Bank:

Promoting Regional Trade
Infrastructure Development, Multimodal International Freight Movement
 San Francisco Water Transit
Authority Ridership Forecasting &
Modeling
 World Research Institute (WRI)
Inter-city Passenger & Freight
Transport in the MumbaiAhmedabad Corridor
 Multimodal Freight Model for
Houston Galveston Area Council
(HGAC), Texas, USA
 Thane Light Rail Feasibility Analysis
 Master Plans for Al Khrair & Madina
Zayat Areas, Abu Dhabi
 Ann Arbor Travel Demand Model
 Whatcom County Travel Demand
Model, Whatcom County, WA
 Colorado – I70 Corridor Model
Evaluation
 Caltrans District 4 – Construct 4th
Bore at the Caldecott Tunnels
 South Amboy Ferry Research
Study
 Bangalore Travel Demand Model
Evaluation & Emissions
Methodology
 Rajkot Travel Demand Model
 New Jersey (NJ) Transit Demand
Forecasting Model Development &
Training
 Doyle Drive Micro Simulation
Study, San Francisco
 Contra Costa Transportation
Authority (CCTA) Model Evaluation
Study
 Metropolitan Transportation
Commission (MTC) Master Plan &
Mobility Study
 Washington DC Capital Beltway
Corridor Transportation Study
 Ferry Passenger Market Feasibility
Analysis
 Minot Transportation Model for
the City of Minot, North Dakota
 Northwest New Jersey-Northeast
Pennsylvania Major Investment
Study (MIS)
 Port Authority of Allegheny
County, Pittsburgh
 New York Metropolitan
Transportation Authority (MTA) for
the Lower Manhattan Access Study
 Union County Light Rail Project
 Integrating MIS & Vision Planning
 Air Quality Conformity Analysis
 I-270/US 15 Multimodal Corridor
Study

17.M

TJKM | VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY
Planning  Engineering  ITS  Parking  Operations  Complete Streets California | Florida | Texas
 Transportation Planning
 Construction Management
 Corridor Studies
 Complete Streets
 Traffic Signal Systems
1BYEARS OF EXPERIENCE
9 2BPROFESSIONAL HISTORY
TJKM 2013-Present
Larsen & Toubro Ltd. 2011-2012
Simplex Infrastructure
Pvt. Ltd. 2010-2011
3BEDUCATION
M.S., Civil Engineering, University of
Akron, Akron, OH
B.S., Civil Engineering, Pune University,
Pune, Maharashtra, India
Project Experience
On-Call Traffic/Transportation
Planning & Engineering
 City of Tracy
Corridor Studies/Complete Streets
 Hollister Avenue Complete Streets
Study, Goleta
 Eureka North-South Multimodal
Corridor Study, Eureka
 South County Corridor Study,
Stanislaus County
 Rengstorff Avenue Signal
Coordination & Corridor Study,
Mountain View
 California Street/Escuela Avenue
Complete Streets, Mountain View
Transportation Planning
 Traffic Impact Study for the
Proposed Capital Toyota
Dealership Expansion, San Jose
 Menlo Park General Plan Update,
Menlo Park
 Truck Restriction Plan
Development, South San Francisco
 AIM Parking & Traffic Circulation
Study, Marin County
Traffic Impact Studies
 16601 Almaden Expressway
Daycare Center, San Jose
 CarMax Transportation Impact
Studies, San Jose
 Mosque Traffic Study, Hayward
 North Capitol & Hostetter Road
Traffic Impact Study, San Jose
 Mountain House Parkway at I-205
Project Study Report, San Joaquin
County
 I-580/Mountain House Parkway
Project Study Report, San Joaquin
County
 Tech Corner, Mountain View
 Rancho Murieta Community
Residential Development,
Sacramento County
 2747 & 3045 Park Boulevard, Palo
Alto
 3345 North Texas Street Traffic
Impact Analysis, Fairfield
Safe Routes to School/Pedestrian &
Bicycle Projects
 Pedestrian & Bicyclist Safety &
Connectivity Study, Dinuba
Traffic Calming
 Neighborhood Traffic Calming
Program & Complete Streets
Policy, Dinuba
Traffic Signal Systems & Signal
Coordination
 Treat Boulevard Signal
Coordination, Concord
 University Avenue & Donohoe
Street Signal Coordination, East
Palo Alto
 Signal Coordination Timing &
Optimization, Sunnyvale
 MTC PASS, San Francisco Bay Area
 Citywide Signal Coordination,
Pittsburg

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Mr. Paparaju has more than nine years of professional experience in the areas of professional experience in the areas of traffic operations, signal coordination, traffic impact studies, simulation modelling, bridge design, and construction oversight. He is has completed a variety of engineering tasks for many express lane projects, corridor system management plans, highway corridor operation analysis, signal timing, and transportation management plans. He is very familiar with Caltrans project study phases: Preliminary Planning Study (PPS), PSR&PDS, PSR, PA/ED, and PS&E. He has extensive experience using various transportation engineering software packages, including Synchro, FreQ, VISSIM, TransModeler, HCS, Traffix, Vistro, and Sidra.

Sandeep Paparaju

SENIOR TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
Project Role: Data Collection Task Lead

17.M

TJKM | VISION THAT MOVES YOUR COMMUNITY | Sandeep Paparaju 2 TJK
 Citywide Signal Coordination,
Concord
 MTC PASS 2018-2019 Cycle,
Fairfield
 MTC PASS 2013-2015 Cycle,
Concord
 MTC PASS 2014-2015 Cycle, San
Ramon
 Implementation & Fine-tuning of
Signal Timing Plan on Buskirk
Avenue, Pleasant Hill
 Fair Oaks/Howe Signal
Modification, Sacramento
 Cypress Avenue Signal
Coordination, Redding
 Implementation & Fine-tuning of
Signal Timing Plan on Buskirk
Avenue, Pleasant Hill
Speed Surveys
 2014 Speed Zone Studies, Antioch
Parking
 Parking Study for 1350 S. Eliseo,
Larkspur

17.M

CALIFORNIA | FLORIDA | TEXAS
Corporate Oce 4305 Hacienda Drive, Suite 550, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925.463.0611 | www.TJKM.com
TJKM

17.M

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Jan 10 2023
Department: Public Works
Submitted by: Eddie Pust, Interim City Manager
Charles Russell, Public Works Operations Manager;
☐ Receive and File ☒ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:

A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Awarding an Agreement for the Purchase and Installation of Playground Equipment and Park Shelter at Mary Henley Park in the Amount of $278,163.07 Utilizing the OMNIA Contract #1036738 and Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Execute All Documents Related to the Agreement Including a 10% Contingency of $27,816.31 if Necessary
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Awarding an Agreement for the Purchase and Installation of Playground Equipment and Park Shelter at Mary Henley Park in the Amount of $278,163.07 Utilizing the OMNIA Contract #1036738 and Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Execute All Documents Related to the Agreement Including a 10% Contingency of $27,816.31 if Necessary.

BACKGROUND:

Mary Henley Park is a City of Hemet park that was established in 1993 and is located at the northwest corner of Johnston Avenue and Kirby Street. The Public Works Parks Division is responsible for the care and maintenance of the turf, trees, and all of its amenities. It contains two playground areas, a half basketball court, park benches, tables, gazebos, a large turf area, restrooms, and a newly constructed outdoor fitness court.

At a Special City Council Meeting held on March 4, 2022, City Council discussed proposed American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) projects along with a host of alternative projects, and City Council approved a project for improvements at Mary Henley Park.

The playground equipment in the north playground and park shelter has reached the end of its useful life due to wear and tear and exposure to the elements, and staff is recommending that they be replaced.

17.N

ANALYSIS:

This project involves the removal of the existing playground equipment and park shelter and installing new playground equipment and park shelter located at the north end of Mary Henley Park.

In an ongoing effort to operate financially sustainably, the Public Works Department is taking advantage of a Cooperative Purchase Agreement awarded to GameTime by OMNIA contract #1036738.

Cooperative Purchase Agreements allow the City to secure pricing that has been established through competitive bidding efforts of federal, state, and local government agencies. This process benefits the City by expediting bid awards and avoiding costs related to staff time required for the development of bid specifications, advertisement, and bid openings.

DISCUSSION:

The proposed playground equipment and park shelter replacement is a portion of the ARPA improvement project that the Council allocated a total of $696,215. Public Works staff has divided the overall improvement project into several different improvement categories that are being bid out and completed separately. This particular portion of the overall project will improve Mary Henley Park's north playground’s equipment and park shelter and renew their service life to the community.

Parks and recreation areas are community spaces where adults and children play, exercise, and gather.

The proposed playground equipment and park shelter creates an inclusive environment and will encourage children, adults and families of all abilities to experience the benefits of recreation together.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:

March 4, 2022, Special City Council Meeting - City Council approved the ARPA project for park improvements at Mary Henley Park.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

GOAL ONE: QUALITY OF LIFE:

To ensure that Hemet is safe, clean, attractive and comfortable for all who live, work, and visit.

Objective 1: Enhance the visual appearance of the community to make it attractive and reduce blight.

GOAL THREE: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
To connect and participate in a constant dialogue between members of the community, City staff, and elected officials to promote togetherness and positivity.

Objective 3: Increase the community's pride within the City.

GOAL FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
To identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability.

Objective 1: Operate in a financially sustainable manner.

FISCAL IMPACT:

17.N

There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding for this ARPA project is budgeted in account 270- 5739-5400 in the FY 22/23 budget.

The itemized project cost is as follows:

Playground Equipment (Removal/Installation) $214,381.01 Park Shelter (Removal/Installation) $ 59,592.06
Payment and Performance Bond $ 4,190.00
Contingency of 10% (If needed) $ 27,816.31
Total $ 305,979.38
ALTERNATIVE(S):

1. Do not approve the purchase and installation of the playground equipment and park shelter.

2. Provide alternative direction to City staff.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment 1_ Resolution for Mary Henley Park Playground Equipment and Shelter Attachment 2: Playground Equipment Proposal
Attachment 3: Shelter Proposal

17.N

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xxx

CITY OF HEMET

HEMET, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xxx

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING THE

PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF PLAYGROUND

EQUIPMENT AND PARK SHELTER AT MARY HENLEY

PARK TO GAMETIME IN THE AMOUNT OF
$278,163.07 UTILIZING THE OMNIA CONTRACT
#1036738 AND AUTHORING THE INTERIM CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS RELATED
TO THE AGREEMENT INCLUDING A 10%
CONTINGENCY OF $27,816.31 IF NECESSARY
The City Council of the City of Hemet, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, Mary Henley Park is a City of Hemet park that was established in 1993 and is located at the north west corner of Johnston Ave. and Kirby St.; and WHEREAS, the Public Works Parks Division is responsible for the care and maintenance of the turf, trees and all of Mary Henley Park’s amenities; and WHEREAS, on March 4, 2022, City Council approved an American Rescue Plan Act project for park improvements at Mary Henley Park; and WHEREAS, the playground equipment and park shelter at the northern section of Mary Henley Park have reached the end of their useful life and need to be replaced; and
WHEREAS, playground equipment and park shelters create an inclusive environment and will encourage children, adults and families to experience the benefits of Mary Henley Park; and
WHEREAS, funding for this ARPA project is budgeted in account 270-5739- 5400 in the FY 22/23 budget; and

17.N

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xxx

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2. Awards the purchase and installation of playground equipment and park shelter to GameTime in the amount of $278,163.07 utilizing the OMNIA Contract #1036738.

SECTION 3. Authorizes the Interim City Manager to execute all documents related to the agreement including a 10% contingency of $27,816.31 if necessary.

SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of January 2023. ____________________________
Joe Males, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
John Paul Maier, City Clerk

17.N

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xxx
State of California )
County of Riverside )
City of Hemet )
I, John Paul Maier, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Hemet City Council on the 10th day of January 2023, and was passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members: None.

NOES: Council Members: None.

ABSTAIN: Council Members: None.

ABSENT: Council Members: None.
_____________________________
John Paul Maier, City Clerk

17.N

17.N

Proposal for
City of Hemet
Prepared by
11-16-2022
Job # 107815-05
Mary Henley Park 5-12 Play Structure
805-320-9007 | gwpark.com

17.N

GameTime Division
PlayCore Wisconsin, Inc.
150 PlayCore Drive SE
Fort Payne, Alabama 35967
Telephone: 256/845-5610
Facsimile: 256/845-9361
Website: http://www.gametime.com/

QUALIFICATION STATEMENT FOR FURNISHING PLAYGROUND AND

ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT, SAFETY SURFACING, & INSTALLATION SERVICES The GameTime Division of PlayCore Wisconsin, Inc., in collaboration with your local GameTime regional sales representative agency, seeks to prequalify, first as a manufacturer and vendor of park and playground equipment, and secondly as a first-tier subcontractor to furnish and install safety surfacing.

Additionally, we are positioned to provide installation services through our network of factory-trained and certified installers. As this submittal attests, GameTime is fully qualified to provide the necessary equipment and services to fulfill requirements of the most demanding project.

GameTime has been manufacturing commercial playground apparatus continuously since 1929. The GameTime Division is a vertically integrated company with extensive design, manufacturing, distribution and installation capabilities. With 400,000 sq. ft. under roof on an 81-acre facility devoted solely to the manufacture of playground equipment, GameTime is well equipped to handle orders of any size. Seasonal weekly production can exceed $2,850,000. Daily inventory often exceeds $6,000,000. GameTime does all metal fabrication, rotationally molded plastic, PVC coating and powder coating “in-house”. Once an order is entered, GameTime delivers equipment to its customers within 21 to 30 days.

GameTime currently employs 400 people in the design and manufacture of commercial playground and recreation equipment. The staff includes five industrial designers, four product managers, three structural engineers, a landscape architect, and eight CAD operators in the product development, design and processing groups. The GameTime office staff total 112. Additionally, a number of consultants collaborate in key areas.

GameTime products are distributed in the United States by a network of 13 domestic independent sales organizations employing 130 sales and 98 support personnel. Seventeen international distributors market GameTime products worldwide.

GameTime conducts “GT College” annually and holds seminars throughout the year to disseminate the latest in product improvements and new design directions, computer technology, safety compliance, risk management, installation techniques, ADA requirements, and related topics. Staff members are CPSI certified playground safety inspectors. GameTime provides local on-site playground design services utilizing laptop computers with exclusive GTCAD programing; furnishes CPSI safety audits; equipment selection consultations; safety surfacing materials; and installation by “factory-certified” installers for complete “turnkey” packages. On average, GameTime sales agencies have been serving customers for 32 years.

Originally founded in Michigan, GameTime division headquarters and manufacturing relocated to Fort Payne, Alabama U.S.A. in 1979. In March of 1997, PlayCore Wisconsin, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of PlayCore, Inc. (AMEX: PCO), acquired GameTime, Inc. Chartwell Investments acquired all issued and outstanding shares of PlayCore stock in April 2000, and the company became privately held. Irving Place Capital (formerly Bear Stearns Merchant Banking), together with company management, purchased PlayCore in February 2007. On May 30, 2014 PlayCore was acquired by Sentinel Capital Partners, a New

17.N

GAMETIME PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT

York middle-market private equity firm which subsequently sold the company to Court Square Capital Partners https://www.courtsquare.com/, Park Avenue Plaza, 55 East 52nd Street, 34th Floor, New York, NY 10055 on October 2, 2017. PlayCore product sales for 2021 are expected to exceed $650,000,000.

PlayCore is a leading designer, manufacturer, and marketer of a broad range of commercial playground and park equipment, safety surfacing, site amenities, fitness, and related products. PlayCore currently operates seven distribution locations; four core manufacturing facilities; and ten specialized manufacturing sites. The PlayCore Federal Identification Number is 39-1720480; DUNS Number 006639710 and CAGE Code 84308.

We submit this as verification GameTime is financially sound, experienced, and well positioned to provide a full-solution, total turnkey package for playground equipment and related services from design to final inspection. As a privately-held company, Court Square Capital Partners refrains from distribution of financial data on segments of its investment portfolio that may be subject to public disclosure. Should further financial particulars on PlayCore be necessary, kindly contact Ms. Joni Manley, Vice President Finance and Accounting, 423/648-5890, [email protected].

We certify the information submitted herein is true and correct.

GAMETIME DIVISION
Clint Whiteside
Sales Administration Project Manager

17.N

17.N

17.N

17.N

17.N

17.N

PALETTE COLOR SELECTIONS
Project: Approved by:______________________________________ Surfacing:

PRIMARY PALETTES NATURAL PALETTES CONTEMPORARY PALETTES

17.N

Total Elevated Play Components
Total Different Types Of Ground Level ComponentsTotal Accessible Ground Level Components ShownTotal Elevated Components Accessible By TransferTotal Elevated Play Components Accessible By Ramp Representative
This play
equipment is recommended for children ages
RequiredRequiredRequiredRequired This drawing can be
scaled only when in an 18" x 24" format Minimum Area Required: Scale: Drawing Name: Date: This Unit includes play events and Drawn By: routes or travel specifically designed for special needs users. It is the opinion of the manufacturer that these play events and routes of travel conform to the accessibility requirements of the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) IMPORTANT: Soft resilient surfacing should be placed in the use zones of all equipment, as specified for each type of equipment, and at depths to meet the critical fall heights as specified by the U.S. consumer Product Safety Commission, ASTM standard F 1487 and Canadian Standard CAN/CSA-Z-614 C E R T I F I E D 150 PlayCore Drive SE Fort Payne, AL 35967 www.gametime.com 1 4 0 0 1 CERTIFIED City of Hemet Mary Henley Park Hemet, CA Great Western BR11/11/2022 107815-05-Opt 1 5 - 12 -
- 16
- - 14 8 24 5
7 3 SALES REP MYLES HARVEY 805-320-9007 [email protected] N

17.N

N

17.N

City of Hemet
Attn: Ross Cortz
3777 Industrial Avenue
Hemet, CA 92545
[email protected]
Ship to Zip 92865
Qty Part # Description List $ Selling $ Ext. Selling $
1 RDU GameTime - Custom 5-12 Play StructureReference Drawing # 107815-05-Opt 1$169,890.00 $112,851.61 $112,851.61 1 5179 GameTime - Welcome Sign (5-12) $713.00 $627.44 $627.44 1 6237 GameTime - Shadow Play Sky Runner $8,305.00 $5,979.60 $5,979.60 1 6272 GameTime - Merry-Go-All $9,407.00 $8,842.58 $8,842.58 1 5058 GameTime - Arch Swing (Galv) $8,584.00 $7,210.56 $7,210.56 2 18826 GameTime - Primetime Swing 3 1/2" X 8' $1,799.00 $1,745.03 $3,490.06 3 18827 GameTime - Primetime Swing Add A Bay 3 1/2" X 8' $1,113.00 $1,079.61 $3,238.83 2 5167 GameTime - Expression Swing Tandem $2,542.00 $2,135.28 $4,270.56 4 8910 GameTime - Belt Seat 3 1/2"Od(8910) $366.00 $307.44 $1,229.76 1 5165 GameTime - Expression Swing w Adaptive Seat 3 1/2 $2,792.00 $2,345.28 $2,345.28 1 5173 GameTime - Adaptive Swing w/Rung Belt $260.00 $218.40 $218.40 3 8696 GameTime - Encl Seat 3 1/2"(8696) $456.00 $383.04 $1,149.12 1 INSTALL Install - MobilizationMOBILIZE EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Prevailing Wages
$1,830.00 $1,830.00 $1,830.00
1 INSTALL Install - DemolitionDEMO AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING EQUIPMENT. LARGE CLIMBING ROCKS TO REMAIN IN PLACE.

Prevailing Wage
$2,930.00 $2,930.00 $2,930.00
1 INSTALL Install - InstallationINSTALLATION ONLY OF GAMETIME PLAY EQUIPMENT Prevailing Wage
$39,015.00 $39,015.00 $39,015.00
Contract: OMNIA #2017001134 Sub Total $195,228.80
Freight $5,900.00
Tax $13,252.21
Total $214,381.01
GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
11/16/2022
Quote #
107815-05-01
Mary Henley Park Playground

17.N

Comments
Your Sales Rep is Myles Harvey. Please reach out to Myles at 805-320-9007 if you should have any questions regarding this quote.

Due to the volatility of freight costs, the freight pricing is subject to change at the time of order.

Pricing is subject to change. Request updated pricing when purchasing from quotes more than 30 days old. ***OPTIONAL-To include a Payment and Performance Bond, please add $3275 plus tax if applicable.

Shipping to:
2163 N Glassell St
Orange, CA 92865
Site Address:
801 Kirby St
Hemet, CA 92545
Customer to confirm site address at time of order
*Freight charges are based on listed zip code and are subject to change if shipping information changes. *Deposit may be required.

Prevailing wage
OMNIA # 1036738
GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
11/16/2022
Quote #
107815-05-01
Mary Henley Park Playground

17.N

Remit Payment to:

GameTime
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35968
Taxes:

All applicable taxes will be added at time of invoicing unless otherwise included or a tax-exempt certificate is provided.

If sales tax exempt, you must provide a copy of certificate to be considered exempt.

Prices:

FOB Factory.

Orders:

All orders shall be in writing by purchase order, contract, or similar document made out to PlayCore Wisconsin Inc., dba GameTime.

Standard GameTime equipment orders over $100,000 may require a deposit of 25% at the time of order and an additional 25% at or before order ships Standard orders with equipment, installation and surfacing are requested to be split billed.

Equipment, Taxes & Freight as noted above
Installation and Surfacing billed as completed and Due Upon Receipt.

Terms:

Cash With Order Discount (CWO): Orders for GameTime equipment paid in full at time of order via check, Electronic Funds Transfer (ACH or wire) are eligible for a three percent (3%) cash with order discount.

Payment via credit card:  If you elect to pay by credit card, GameTime charges a 2.50% processing fee that is assessed on the amount of your payment.  This fee is shown as a separate line item and included in the total amount charged to your credit card.  You have the option to pay by check, ACH or Wire without any additional fees.

Credit terms are Net 30 days, subject to approval by the GameTime Credit Manager. A completed credit application must be submitted and approved prior to the order being received. Please allow at minimum 2 days for the credit review process. GameTime may also require:

Completed Project Information Sheet (if applicable)
Copies of Payment and Performance Bonds (if applicable) A 1.5% per month finance charge will be imposed on all past due invoices.

Retainage not accepted.

Orders under $5,000 require payment with order.

DIR# 1000015526 CSLB#855664
INSTALLATION CONDITIONS:

ACCESS: Site should be clear, level and allow for unrestricted access of trucks and machinery.

STORAGE: Customer is responsible for providing a secure location to off-load and store the equipment during the installation process. Once equipment has delivered to the site, the owner is responsible should theft or vandalism occur unless other arrangements are made and noted on the quotation.

FOOTER EXCAVATION: Installation pricing is based on footer excavation through earth/soil only. Customer shall be responsible for unknown conditions such as buried utilities (public & private), tree stumps, rock, or any concealed materials or conditions that may result in additional labor or materials cost.

UTILITIES: Owner is responsible for locating any private utilities.

ADDITIONAL COSTS: Pricing is based on a single mobilization for installation unless otherwise noted. Price includes ONLY what is stated in this quotation. If additional site work or specialized equipment is required, pricing is subject to change.

GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
11/16/2022
Quote #
107815-05-01
Mary Henley Park Playground

17.N

ACCEPTANCE OF QUOTATION:

Acceptance of this proposal indicates your agreement to the terms and conditions stated herein.

Accepted By (printed): _________________________________ Title: ________________________________ Purchase Amount: $214,381.01 Date: _______________________________ ________________________________________________________________ Customer Signature
Please fill out this ORDER FORM, this is required to process the order.

GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
11/16/2022
Quote #
107815-05-01
Mary Henley Park Playground

17.N

Proposal for
City of Hemet
Prepared by
11-16-2022
Job # 107815-06
Mary Henley Park Shelter
805-320-9007 | gwpark.com

17.N

GameTime Division
PlayCore Wisconsin, Inc.
150 PlayCore Drive SE
Fort Payne, Alabama 35967
Telephone: 256/845-5610
Facsimile: 256/845-9361
Website: http://www.gametime.com/

QUALIFICATION STATEMENT FOR FURNISHING PLAYGROUND AND

ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT, SAFETY SURFACING, & INSTALLATION SERVICES The GameTime Division of PlayCore Wisconsin, Inc., in collaboration with your local GameTime regional sales representative agency, seeks to prequalify, first as a manufacturer and vendor of park and playground equipment, and secondly as a first-tier subcontractor to furnish and install safety surfacing.

Additionally, we are positioned to provide installation services through our network of factory-trained and certified installers. As this submittal attests, GameTime is fully qualified to provide the necessary equipment and services to fulfill requirements of the most demanding project.

GameTime has been manufacturing commercial playground apparatus continuously since 1929. The GameTime Division is a vertically integrated company with extensive design, manufacturing, distribution and installation capabilities. With 400,000 sq. ft. under roof on an 81-acre facility devoted solely to the manufacture of playground equipment, GameTime is well equipped to handle orders of any size. Seasonal weekly production can exceed $2,850,000. Daily inventory often exceeds $6,000,000. GameTime does all metal fabrication, rotationally molded plastic, PVC coating and powder coating “in-house”. Once an order is entered, GameTime delivers equipment to its customers within 21 to 30 days.

GameTime currently employs 400 people in the design and manufacture of commercial playground and recreation equipment. The staff includes five industrial designers, four product managers, three structural engineers, a landscape architect, and eight CAD operators in the product development, design and processing groups. The GameTime office staff total 112. Additionally, a number of consultants collaborate in key areas.

GameTime products are distributed in the United States by a network of 13 domestic independent sales organizations employing 130 sales and 98 support personnel. Seventeen international distributors market GameTime products worldwide.

GameTime conducts “GT College” annually and holds seminars throughout the year to disseminate the latest in product improvements and new design directions, computer technology, safety compliance, risk management, installation techniques, ADA requirements, and related topics. Staff members are CPSI certified playground safety inspectors. GameTime provides local on-site playground design services utilizing laptop computers with exclusive GTCAD programing; furnishes CPSI safety audits; equipment selection consultations; safety surfacing materials; and installation by “factory-certified” installers for complete “turnkey” packages. On average, GameTime sales agencies have been serving customers for 32 years.

Originally founded in Michigan, GameTime division headquarters and manufacturing relocated to Fort Payne, Alabama U.S.A. in 1979. In March of 1997, PlayCore Wisconsin, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of PlayCore, Inc. (AMEX: PCO), acquired GameTime, Inc. Chartwell Investments acquired all issued and outstanding shares of PlayCore stock in April 2000, and the company became privately held. Irving Place Capital (formerly Bear Stearns Merchant Banking), together with company management, purchased PlayCore in February 2007. On May 30, 2014 PlayCore was acquired by Sentinel Capital Partners, a New

17.N

GAMETIME PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT

York middle-market private equity firm which subsequently sold the company to Court Square Capital Partners https://www.courtsquare.com/, Park Avenue Plaza, 55 East 52nd Street, 34th Floor, New York, NY 10055 on October 2, 2017. PlayCore product sales for 2021 are expected to exceed $650,000,000.

PlayCore is a leading designer, manufacturer, and marketer of a broad range of commercial playground and park equipment, safety surfacing, site amenities, fitness, and related products. PlayCore currently operates seven distribution locations; four core manufacturing facilities; and ten specialized manufacturing sites. The PlayCore Federal Identification Number is 39-1720480; DUNS Number 006639710 and CAGE Code 84308.

We submit this as verification GameTime is financially sound, experienced, and well positioned to provide a full-solution, total turnkey package for playground equipment and related services from design to final inspection. As a privately-held company, Court Square Capital Partners refrains from distribution of financial data on segments of its investment portfolio that may be subject to public disclosure. Should further financial particulars on PlayCore be necessary, kindly contact Ms. Joni Manley, Vice President Finance and Accounting, 423/648-5890, [email protected].

We certify the information submitted herein is true and correct.

GAMETIME DIVISION
Clint Whiteside
Sales Administration Project Manager

17.N

City of Hemet
Attn: Ross Cortz
3777 Industrial Avenue
Hemet, CA 92545
[email protected]
Ship to Zip 92865
Quantity Part # Description Unit Price Amount
1 SHP 1624 Other Products - Steel Hip 16' x 24' w 8' Eave $20,280.00 $20,280.00 1 ENG Other Products - Engineering $1,000.00 $1,000.00
1 INSTALL Install - MobilizationMOBILIZE EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS Prevailing Wage
$1,830.00 $1,830.00
1 INSTALL Install - DemolitionDEMO AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING SHELTER.

Prevaliing Wage
$11,585.00 $11,585.00
1 INSTALL Install - InstallationINSTALLATION ONLY OF 24' x 16' SCENIC SHELTERS. WITH STANDARD MULTI RIB ROOFING.

Prevailing Wage
$17,070.00 $17,070.00
1 8888 GameTime - For Billing Purposes Only
Contract: OMNIA #2017001134 Sub Total $51,765.00
Discount ($1,489.60)
Estimated Freight $7,585.00
Tax $1,731.66
Total $59,592.06
GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
11/16/2022
Quote #
107815-06-01
Mary Henley Park Shelter

17.N

Comments
Your Sales Rep is Myles Harvey. Please reach out to Myles at 805-320-9007 if you should have any questions regarding this quote.

Due to the volatility of freight costs, the freight pricing is subject to change at the time of order.

Pricing is subject to change. Request updated pricing when purchasing from quotes more than 30 days old. ***OPTIONAL-To include a Payment and Performance Bond, please add $915 plus tax if applicable.

Shipping to:
2163 N Glassell St
Orange, CA 92865
Site Address:
801 Kirby St
Hemet, CA 92545
Customer to confirm site address at time of order
*Freight charges are based on listed zip code and are subject to change if shipping information changes. *25% Equipment Deposit required.

Prevailing wage
OMNIA # 1036738
GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
11/16/2022
Quote #
107815-06-01
Mary Henley Park Shelter

17.N

Remit Payment to:

GameTime
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35968
Taxes:

All applicable taxes will be added at time of invoicing unless otherwise included or a tax-exempt certificate is provided.

If sales tax exempt, you must provide a copy of certificate to be considered exempt.

Prices:

FOB Factory.

Orders:

All orders shall be in writing by purchase order, contract, or similar document made out to PlayCore Wisconsin Inc., dba GameTime.

Standard GameTime equipment orders over $100,000 may require a deposit of 25% at the time of order and an additional 25% at or before order ships Standard orders with equipment, installation and surfacing are requested to be split billed.

Equipment, Taxes & Freight as noted above
Installation and Surfacing billed as completed and Due Upon Receipt.

Terms:

Cash With Order Discount (CWO): Orders for GameTime equipment paid in full at time of order via check, Electronic Funds Transfer (ACH or wire) are eligible for a three percent (3%) cash with order discount.

Payment via credit card:  If you elect to pay by credit card, GameTime charges a 2.50% processing fee that is assessed on the amount of your payment.  This fee is shown as a separate line item and included in the total amount charged to your credit card.  You have the option to pay by check, ACH or Wire without any additional fees.

Credit terms are Net 30 days, subject to approval by the GameTime Credit Manager. A completed credit application must be submitted and approved prior to the order being received. Please allow at minimum 2 days for the credit review process. GameTime may also require:

Completed Project Information Sheet (if applicable)
Copies of Payment and Performance Bonds (if applicable) A 1.5% per month finance charge will be imposed on all past due invoices.

Retainage not accepted.

Orders under $5,000 require payment with order.

DIR# 1000015526 CSLB#855664
INSTALLATION CONDITIONS:

ACCESS: Site should be clear, level and allow for unrestricted access of trucks and machinery.

STORAGE: Customer is responsible for providing a secure location to off-load and store the equipment during the installation process. Once equipment has delivered to the site, the owner is responsible should theft or vandalism occur unless other arrangements are made and noted on the quotation.

FOOTER EXCAVATION: Installation pricing is based on footer excavation through earth/soil only. Customer shall be responsible for unknown conditions such as buried utilities (public & private), tree stumps, rock, or any concealed materials or conditions that may result in additional labor or materials cost.

UTILITIES: Owner is responsible for locating any private utilities.

ADDITIONAL COSTS: Pricing is based on a single mobilization for installation unless otherwise noted. Price includes ONLY what is stated in this quotation. If additional site work or specialized equipment is required, pricing is subject to change.

GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
11/16/2022
Quote #
107815-06-01
Mary Henley Park Shelter

17.N

ACCEPTANCE OF QUOTATION:

Acceptance of this proposal indicates your agreement to the terms and conditions stated herein.

Accepted By (printed): _________________________________ Title: ________________________________ Purchase Amount: $59,592.06 Date: _______________________________ ________________________________________________________________ Customer Signature
Please fill out this ORDER FORM, this is required to process the order.

GameTime C/O Great Western Recreation
P.O. Box 680121
Fort Payne, AL 35967
Office: 435-245-5055 Fax: 435-245-5057
www.gwpark.com
11/16/2022
Quote #
107815-06-01
Mary Henley Park Shelter

17.N

CONCEPT DRAWING - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
The information shown within this drawing is the intellectual property of Scenic Shelter, not be copied or disclosed to any unauthorized parties in part or its entirety without our written permission, and they shall not be used for construction.

COPYRIGHT 2021
MOD#: SHP1624 MODEL: 16x24 Steel Hip Shelter
BY: JASON DRAWING SCALE: NTS PAGE: 1 OF 1
ORG. DATE: 5-5-2021 REV. DATE: - REV: -
PH: 855-544-8439 www.ScenicShelters.com
ADDRESS: 7125 Headley Street SE #795, Ada, MI 49301 4
12 TS = Tubular Steel
NOTES:

TS Purlins
TS Hip Beam
TS Column
24ga. Multi-Rib
Metal Roofing
8'
Eave Ht.
24'
21'
13' 16'
TS Ridge

17.N

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Jan 10 2023
Department: Finance
Submitted by: Eddie Pust, Interim City Manager
Paul Espinoza, Interim Finance Director;
☐ Receive and File ☒ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:

Approve the Successor Agency to the Former Hemet Redevelopment Agency Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule and Administrative Budget for Fiscal Year 23-24 RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the Successor Agency to the Former Hemet Redevelopment Agency (“Successor Agency”):

Approve the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“ROPS”) and Administrative Budget for July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 (“23-24”).

BACKGROUND:

Pursuant to the dissolution of redevelopment agencies per Assembly Bill (“AB”) ABX1 26 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2011) and ABX1 27 (Chapter 6, Statutes of 2011), and subsequent legislation, AB 1484 (Chapter 26, Statutes of 2012) (altogether, “Dissolution Act”), the City of Hemet (“City”) adopted Resolution No. 2012-08-2537 on January 11, 2012, electing to serve as the Successor Agency to the former Hemet Redevelopment Agency (“former RDA”). The Successor Agency is required to prepare a ROPS prior to each 12-month fiscal period.

On September 22, 2015, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill (“SB”) 107, which went into effect immediately. SB 107 made several key changes to the Health and Safety Code (“HSC”) sections that establish the ROPS process (“the Dissolution Law”). On July 1, 2018, local oversight boards established by the Dissolution Law (specifically HSC Sections 34179 to 34181) to oversee successor agencies’ actions were replaced by countywide oversight boards. As of July 1, 2018, the applicable consolidated oversight board overseeing the Successor Agency is called the Countywide Oversight Board for the County of Riverside (“Oversight Board”).

Oversight boards have broad authority to determine meeting dates at which successor agencies must submit items, to set administrative budgets, to approve enforceable obligations, and otherwise to direct the successor agency to perform activities to wind down the former redevelopment agencies.

Therefore, after the ROPS 23-24 and the Administrative Budget have been approved by the Successor

17.O

Agency, the ROPS 23-24 will be sent to the Oversight Board for approval at its meeting on January 19, 2023.

DISCUSSION:

The City, acting as the Successor Agency, continues to prepare ROPS to ensure the former RDA’s financial obligations are met.

The Successor Agency is being asked to consider approval of the accompanying ROPS 23-24, attached as Exhibit A, and, once approved, transmit it to the Oversight Board and then the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) to allow for disbursement of revenue to meet upcoming debt service payments and related enforceable obligations.

The ROPS 23-24 contains the following sections:

1. Summary;

2. Detailed description of requested funding for the upcoming fiscal year;

3. Account of cash balances for Fiscal Year 20-21; and

4. Notes to explain parts of the ROPS.

In total, the Successor Agency is requesting $1,023,694in Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Funds (“RPTTF”) and the use of $763,422 in Reserve Balance funds as shown on the ROPS Summary. These obligations are divided between two periods: 23-24A and 23-24B. These two periods correspond to the biannual disbursement of RPTTF dollars from the Riverside County Auditor-Controller (“County A/C”) to the Successor Agency, which occurs in January and June each year. The Successor Agency is requesting funds for the following items:

1. Estimated Fiscal Agent Fees;

2. Tax Allocation Refunding Bond Payments; and

3. Successor Agency Administrative Costs.

Estimated Fiscal Agent Fees
The Successor Agency is required to provide payments to Union Bank, the designated fiscal agent for the 2014 Tax Allocation Bond Refunding. The Fiscal Agent holds the accounts for the bonds and makes the debt service payments twice a year. The Successor Agency is requesting $3,600.This payment will continue until the bonds are paid off in 2031.

Tax Allocation Refunding Bond Payment
The Refunding Bonds were issued on December 23, 2014. In accordance with the terms of the bond issuance, the Successor Agency is required to prepare payment for the full calendar year of debt service payments. This includes requesting funding and using reserve funds for two payments totaling $875,969 during Fiscal Year 23-24 and one payment totaling $782,547 to reserve for Fiscal Year 24-

25. Hemet Unified School District Certificates of Participation The Hemet Unified School District (“HUSD”) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the former RDA on October 23, 1990 for the financing of public school facilities. HUSD has requested that the Successor Agency add an item to ROPS 20-21 for the payment of the below items:

17.O

• Agreement for Cooperation Between HUSD, the former RDA, and the City, dated October 12, 1982 (“Passthrough Agreement”);
• Memorandum of Understanding between HUSD and the former RDA, dated October 23, 1990 (“MOU”);
• HUSD’s 2015 Refunding Certificates of Participation in the amount of $16,690,000 and a maturity date of October 1, 2028 (“2015 Refunding COPs”); and • HUSD’s 2019 Refunding Certificates of Participation in the amount of $2,925,000 and a maturity date of October 1, 2031 (“2019 Refunding COPs”).

HUSD makes this request per section 9, page 12 of the MOU, which specifically states:
"For purposes of Section 33675 of the Health and Safety Code, the lease payments with respect to the District's 1990 COPs and payment on any other lease financing arrangements or other obligations incurred by the District for tire purpose of financing School Projects and secured by the District Share shall be deemed to be a debt of the Agency payable from the District Share in satisfaction of the obligations of the Agency under the Amended Cooperation Agreement. The District shall take all necessary action and cooperate fully with the Agency to enable the Agency to list all payments of the District Share as a debt of the Agency on any 'statements of indebtedness' the Agency may be required to file with the Riverside County Auditor-controller under Section 33675 of the Health and Safety Code." (Emph. added.)
The Successor Agency added ROPS Items 16 and 17 to the ROPS in FY 2020-21 as an obligation to ensure the 2015 Refunding COPs, and 2019 Refunding COPs continue to be paid even if all other enforceable obligations are retired or paid off before their maturity date. The Successor Agency will, again, request $0 in RPTTF for these items.

Successor Agency Administrative Costs
HSC Section 34177(j) requires the Successor Agency to prepare an Administrative Budget and submit it to the Oversight Board for approval. Per HSC Section 34177, each successor agency is limited to an administrative cost allowance of the greater of $250,000 or 3% of its approved non-administrative obligations in the previous ROPS year. The Successor Agency had $898,984 in non-administrative obligations approved in the ROPS period covering July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, allowing the Successor Agency to request the greater of $26,970 or $250,000. The Successor Agency is only requesting $125,000, of which the total $125,000 will be disbursed July 1, 2023.

Submittal to the California Department of Finance
Dissolution Law requires that the ROPS 23-24 be approved by the Oversight Board and submitted to DOF, the State Controller’s Office, and the Riverside County Auditor-Controller no later than February 1, 2023. If this deadline is not met, the City of Hemet (as the City and not as the Successor Agency) will be required to pay a $10,000 per day fine.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

GOAL FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
To identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability.

Objective 2: Evaluate existing practices to ensure continuity with industry best practices.

17.O

Objective 3: Provide Council with policies that are consistent while lessening liabilities.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Upon approval by the Successor Agency, Oversight Board, and DOF, ROPS 23-24 would request RPTTF funding needed for the Successor Agency to timely remit payments on enforceable obligations due during Fiscal Year 23-24. The City and other affected taxing agencies are entitled to receive the balance (“Residual”) of any RPTTF available after each of the two RPTTF distribution periods based on their respective shares.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Hemet SA Resolution - ROPS 23-24 Admin Budget
FY 2023-24 Administrative Budget
Hemet ROPS 23-24 Template to Send to City

17.O

SUCCESSOR AGENCY RESOLUTION BILL NO. 2023-__

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER HEMET

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Hemet, California
RESOLUTION BILL NO. 2023-__

A RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

FORMER HEMET REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING

THE RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR
JULY 1, 2023 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2024 AND APPROVING
THE ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET FOR JULY 1, 2023 THROUGH
JUNE 30, 2024.

WHEREAS, pursuant to the dissolution of redevelopment
agencies per Assembly Bill (“AB”) ABX1 26 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2011) and ABX1 27 (Chapter 6, Statutes of 2011), and subsequent legislation, AB 1484 (Chapter 26, Statutes of 2012) (altogether, “Dissolution Act”), the City of Hemet (“City”) adopted Resolution No. 2012-08-2547 on January 11, 2012, electing to serve as Successor Agency to the Hemet Redevelopment Agency (“Successor Agency”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health & Safety Code (“HSC”)
Section 34177(m), the Successor Agency is required to prepare a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“ROPS”) prior to each 12-month fiscal period, in a manner prescribed by the California Department of Finance (“DOF”), and submit the ROPS to the

17.O

SUCCESSOR AGENCY RESOLUTION BILL NO. 2023-__
oversight board, the Riverside County Auditor-Controller, the State Controller’s Office, and DOF for review and approval; and WHEREAS, as of, on, and after July 1, 2018, under the
Dissolution Law, Section 34179(j), in every California county there shall be only one oversight board that is staffed by the county auditor-controller; and
WHEREAS, the applicable consolidated oversight board
overseeing this Successor Agency is called the Countywide Oversight Board for the County of Riverside (“Oversight Board”); and
WHEREAS, every oversight board, both the prior local
oversight board and this newly established Oversight Board, has fiduciary responsibilities to the holders of enforceable obligations and to the taxing entities that benefit from distributions of property tax and other revenues under the Dissolution Law, in particular Section 34188; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to HSC Section 34177(m), the
ROPS for the period beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024 (“23-24”) shall be submitted to the Oversight Board and DOF no later than February 1, 2023; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to HSC Section 34177(m)(2), if a
successor agency does not submit a ROPS by the
aforementioned deadline, the city, county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency shall be subject to a civil

17.O

SUCCESSOR AGENCY RESOLUTION BILL NO. 2023-__
penalty equal to ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per day for every day the schedule is not submitted to DOF; and
WHEREAS, Section 34177(j) of the Dissolution Act
requires the Successor Agency to prepare a proposed
Administrative Budget for 23-24 (“Administrative Budget”) and submit it to the Oversight Board for approval; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 34177(j), the Successor
Agency’s Administrative Budget is to include all of the following:
(a) estimated amounts of the Successor Agency's administrative costs for the upcoming twelve-month fiscal period; (b) the proposed sources of payment for the costs identified in (a); and (c) proposals for arrangements for administrative and operations services provided by the city serving as Successor Agency; and WHEREAS, Exhibit “A” to this Resolution establishes the ROPS 23-24 and Exhibit “B” to this Resolution establishes the Administrative Budget in a manner consistent with that prescribed by DOF; and
WHEREAS, the Oversight Board is expected to consider
approval of the ROPS 23-24 and the Administrative Budget for 23- 24 on January 19, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the Successor Agency desires to approve the
ROPS 23-24 along with the Administrative Budget and transmit it to the Oversight Board, the Riverside County Auditor-Controller,

17.O

SUCCESSOR AGENCY RESOLUTION BILL NO. 2023-__
the State Controller’s Office, and DOF as required by HSC Section 34172, et seq.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED
AND ORDERED by the Successor Agency to the Former Hemet Redevelopment Agency, in regular session assembled December 13, 2022 as follows:

1. That the Successor Agency hereby finds and declares
that the above recitals are true and correct.

2. The Successor Agency hereby approves the ROPS 23-
24, attached hereto as Exhibit A, subject to the approval of the Oversight Board and DOF. The Successor Agency
also accepts administrative revisions made to the ROPS
23-24 in order to enable the Successor Agency to submit the ROPS 23-24 to DOF by the deadline of February 1,
2023.

3. The Successor Agency approves the Administrative
Budget, attached hereto as Exhibit B, that is included in the ROPS 23-24.

4. Successor Agency staff is directed to transmit the ROPS 23-24 to the Oversight Board and upon Oversight Board’s approval, post the ROPS 23-24 on the City of Hemet’s
website and submit the ROPS 23-24 to DOF, the
California State Controller’s Office, and the Riverside County Auditor-Controller prior to February 1, 2023 as
required by law.

17.O

SUCCESSOR AGENCY RESOLUTION BILL NO. 2023-__
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 10th day of January
2023.
________________
_________________
Joe Males, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED
AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
__________
________________
_______
John Maier, City Clerk Steven
Graham, City
Attorney

17.O

SUCCESSOR AGENCY RESOLUTION BILL NO. 2023-__
State of California )
County of Riverside )
City of Hemet )
I, John Maier, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is the actual Resolution adopted by the Successor Agency to the Former Hemet Redevelopment
Agency and was passed at a regular meeting of the Successor Agency on the 10th day of January 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

John Maier, City Clerk

17.O

SUCCESSOR AGENCY RESOLUTION BILL NO. 2023-__

EXHIBIT A

RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE
FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2023 TO JUNE 30, 2024

17.O

SUCCESSOR AGENCY RESOLUTION BILL NO. 2023-__

EXHIBIT B

SUCCESSOR AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET
FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2023 TO JUNE 30, 2024

17.O

EXHIBIT B

HEMET SUCCESSOR AGENCY
ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET FY 2023-24
FOR JULY 1, 2023 to JUNE 30, 2024
Expense Category Responsibilities
FY 2023-24
Proposed
Budget
Salaries and Wages
Staff salaries, benefits, and
payroll taxes
• Process payment of enforceable obligations • Maintain documentation of Agency records • Coordinate with consultant to answer questions and provide documentation as requested by Oversight Board, County Auditor-Controller, and Department of Finance
• Prepare Prior Period Adjustment (PPA) • Reconcile Cash Balances $95,000
TOTAL $95,000
Maintenance and Operations
Contract services
• Prepare ROPS, PPA, staff reports, and resolutions • Coordinate with and answer questions for Oversight Board, County Auditor-Controller, and State Department of Finance
• Monitor and project cash flow to ensure sufficient revenues for obligations and to inform Agency staff of expected revenues
• Reconcile Cash Balances
$20,000
Insurance and legal services
• Review staff reports and resolutions • Provide legal services as needed $10,000 TOTAL $30,000
TOTAL BUDGET $125,000

17.O

Successor Agency: Hemet
County: Riverside
Current Period Requested Funding for Enforceable Obligations (ROPS Detail) 23-24A Total
(July - December)
23-24B Total
(January - June) ROPS 23-24 Total
A Enforceable Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D): $ 763,422 $ - $ 763,422 B Bond Proceeds $ - $ - $ -
C Reserve Balance $ 763,422 $ - $ 763,422
D Other Funds $ - $ - $ -
E Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G): $ 125,000 $ 898,694 $ 1,023,694 F RPTTF $ - $ 898,694 $ 898,694 G Administrative RPTTF $ 125,000 $ - $ 125,000 H Current Period Enforceable Obligations (A+E): $ 888,422 $ 898,694 $ 1,787,116 Certification of Oversight Board Chairman: Signature Title Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety Code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the above named successor agency. Signature Title
Recognized Obligation Payment Scehdule (ROPS 23-24) - Summary Filed for the July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 Period

17.O

A

BCDEFGH I JKLMNOPQRSTUVW
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance Other Funds RPTTF
Admin
RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance Other Funds RPTTF
Admin
RPTTF
$ 35,820,780 $ 1,787,116 $ - $ 763,422 $ - $ - $ 125,000 $ 888,422 $ - $ - $ - $ 898,694 $ - $ 898,694 4 Hemet Project Area/Fiscal Agent Fees 6/21/2005 12/31/2031 Union Bank Administration fee for Tax
Allocation Bond administration
All
98,860N $ 3,600 $ - $ 3,600 $ 3,600
5 Successor Agency Costs
(As allowed by H&S Code
Section 34171(b)) Admin Costs 7/1/2014 12/31/2031
City of Hemet Administrative expenses of
Successor Agency
All
2,475,000N $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ -
12 Hemet Project Area/2014
Tax Allocation Refunding
Bonds
Refunding Bonds
Issued After
6/27/12 11/1/2014 12/31/2031
MUFG Union BankRefinancing of Tax Allocation
Bonds (items 1 and 2)
All
7,931,451N $ 875,969 $ 763,422 $ 763,422 $ 112,547 $ 112,547 15 Reserve for Next Period of
Bonds Payment
Reserves 11/1/2014 12/31/2031
City of Hemet Reserve required by Indenture
for 2014 Refunding Bonds for
use in following ROPS period
within the same calendar year
All
6,671,500N $ 782,547 $ - $ 782,547 $ 782,547
16 HUSD 2015 Refunding COP
Miscellaneous 10/1/2015 10/1/2028
Hemet Unified
School District
Certificate of Participation
payment to fund HUSD and the
City's debts secured by
payments under a Passthrough
Agreement/MOU between
HUSD and the former RDA.

All
14,665,794N $ - $ - $ -
17 HUSD 2019 Refunding COP
Miscellaneous 4/1/2020 10/1/2031
Hemet Unified
School District
Certificate of Participation
payment to fund HUSD and the
City's debts secured by
payments under a Passthrough
Agreement/MOU between
HUSD and the former RDA.

All
3,978,175N $ - $ - $ -
23-24B (January - June)
Fund Sources
Hemet Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 23-24) - ROPS Detail July 1,2023 through June 30, 2024
(Report Amounts in Whole Dollars)
Item # Project Name/Debt Obligation Obligation Type
Contract/Agreeme
nt
Execution Date
Contract/Agreeme
nt
Termination Date Payee Description/Project Scope Project Area Total
Outstanding
Debt or
Obligation
23-234B
Retired Total
ROPS 23-24
Total
23-24A (July - December)
Fund Sources
23-24A
Total

17.O

A

BCDEFGH
Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF
Bonds issued on or
before 12/31/10
Bonds issued on or
after 01/01/11
Prior ROPS RPTTF
and Reserve
Balances retained for
future period(s)
Rent,
Grants,
Interest, etc.

Non-Admin
and
Admin
1 Beginning Available Cash Balance (Actual 07/01/20)
RPTTF amount should exclude "A" period distribution amount 790,830 1,022 135,884
E: $-57,207 19-20 ending balance + $3,860 from 18-
19 PPA held for 21-22 + $716,672 reserve for bond
payment + $127,505 19-20 PPA held for 22-23
F: 19-20 ending balance
G: $135,884 from 17-18 PPA for ROPS 20-21
2 Revenue/Income (Actual 06/30/21)
RPTTF amount should tie to the ROPS 18-19 total distribution from the County Auditor-Controller 15 937,210
F: 20-21 Other Revenues
G: 20-21B RPTTF distribution + Early 20-21A
RPTTF from ROPS 19-20
3 Expenditures for ROPS 20-21 Enforceable Obligations
(Actual 06/30/21)
716,672 287,009
G: 20-21 RPTTF Expenses. RPTTF expenditures
exclude the Reserve Balance held for ROPS 20-
21A debt service
4 Retention of Available Cash Balance (Actual 06/30/21) RPTTF amount retained should only include the amounts
distributed as reserve for future period(s)
131,365 733,047
E: $3,860 from 18-19 PPA, $127,505 from 19-20
PPA. G:

Reseve Held for 21-22 bond payment
5 ROPS 20-21 RPTTF Prior Period Adjustment
RPTTF amount should tie to the Agency's ROPS 20-21 PPA
form submitted to the CAC
53,038 G: 20-21 PPA
6 Ending Actual Available Cash Balance (06/30/21)
C to F = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4), G = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4 - 5)
$ 0 $ 0 $ (57,207) $ 1,037 $ 0
No entry required
Hemet Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 23-24) - Report of Cash Balances July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021
(Report Amounts in Whole Dollars)
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 (l), Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) may be listed as a source of payment on the ROPS, but only to the extent no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation. For tips on how to complete the Report of Cash Balances Form, see Cash Balance Tips Sheet.

ROPS 20-21 Cash Balances
(07/01/20 - 06/30/21)
Fund Sources
Comments
Bond Proceeds

17.O

Item # Notes/Comments
Hemet Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 23-24) - Notes July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024

17.O

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Jan 10 2023
Department: Finance
Submitted by: Eddie Pust, Interim City Manager
Paul Espinoza, Interim Finance Director;
☐ Receive and File ☒ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:

A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving the Annual and Five Year AB 1600 Reports for Fiscal Years 2016-17 Through 2021-22 and Making the Findings Required by Government Code Section 66001(D)
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving the Annual and Five Year AB 1600 Reports for Fiscal Years 2016-17 Through 2021-22 and Making the Findings Required by Government Code Section 66001(D).

BACKGROUND:

In 1987, Government Code Section 66000 et seq. became effective with the passage of Assembly Bill 1600 (AB 1600). AB 1600 requires the City to annually prepare a report for the preceding fiscal year concerning the activity of the City’s Development Impact Fees (Gov. Code Section 66006 (b) (1) and (2)). AB 1600 was enacted to regulate the establishment of any new development fee or fee increase after January 1, 1989. The primary purpose of the annual report is to show the necessity of continued imposition of development impact fees. AB 1600 requires the annual report to be reviewed by the City Council at least 15 days after the report is made available for public review.

To be in full compliance with State law, the City must:

1. Spend or commit Development Impact Fees (DIF) within five years of collection; or

2. Adopt a resolution that makes the findings as required by Government Code section 66001(d) every five years.

The City currently collects seven different categories of impact fees, and retains a balance for an additional category, as outlined in the section below.

ANALYSIS:

17.P

1. A key provision of the legislation, namely, Section 66006 (b) (1) of the Government Code requires that local agency shall, within 180 days of the close of each fiscal year, make available to the public the following information for each separate account or fund:
a. A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund. b. The amount of the fee
c. The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund d. The amount of fees collected and interest earned
e. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees f. An identification of an approximate date by which construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete g. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended. In the case of an interfund loan, an identification of that date on which the loan will be repaid, and the rate of interest the account will receive on the loan
h. The amount of refunds made and any allocations of unexpended fees that are not refunded (Gov. Code Section 66006 (b) (1))

2. As of June 30, 2022, the City has nine (9) DIF funds subject to the requirements of Government Code Section 66000. The fund establishment dates and resolution histories are available in the report for:
a. Law Enforcement Facilities Fee
b. Fire Suppression Facilities Fee
c. Bridges, Streets & Traffic Fee (Road Facilities Fee) d. Flood Control Fee (Drainage Facilities Fee
e. Parks and Recreation Facilities Fee
f. Valley Wide Facilities Fee
g. General Facilities Fee
h. Library Facilities Fee
i. Public Meeting Facilities Fee (collection ceased August 22, 2007)

3. To meet the five-year reporting compliance requirements, the AB1600 report includes the following:
a. Identification of the purposes and use/application of the fee; b. A definition of the “reasonable relationship” between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged;
c. Identification of all sources and amount of funding anticipated to complete financing for any incomplete improvements; and
d. The approximate dates when additional funding is anticipated to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.

Development Impact Fees are generally collected at the time building permits are issued for new residential and commercial construction. The impact fees are established by a resolution of the City Council and are deposited into separate development impact fee funds.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

17.P

GOAL THREE: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
To connect and participate in a constant dialogue between members of the community, City staff, and elected officials to promote togetherness and positivity.

Objective 1: Deliver messaging to the Community that connects, is consistent, and relevant.

Objective 2: Increase transparency for the public.

Objective 3: Increase the community's pride within the City.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no General Fund impact. The City must expend or commit Developer Impact Fees collected within five years of receipt of funds. Each fee will continue to be accounted for in a separate fund. (Gov Code Section 66006 (a)).

ATTACHMENT(S):
2022.12.20 FY 2020-21 AB 1600 Report
2022.12.20 FY 2021-22 AB 1600 Report
2022.12.20 FY 2016-17 AB 1600 Report
2022.12.20 FY 2017-18 AB 1600 Report
2022.12.20 FY 2018-19 AB 1600 Report
2022.12.20 FY 2019-20 AB 1600 Report
Resolution AB1600 1-10-23
AB1600 Affidavit

17.P

Development Impact Fee
Annual and Five-Year Report
City of Hemet
For the Fiscal Year and Five Years Ending June 30, 2021 Prepared by:
22 Executive Park | Irvine, CA | 92614

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report i
City of Hemet
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 Section 1 – Requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act (AB1600) .............................................................. 2 Section 2 – Annual Report ........................................................................................................................ 3 Fund 315 - Public Meetings Facilities Fee ............................................................................................ 3 Fund 316 - General Facilities Fee ......................................................................................................... 6 Fund 326 - Flood Control (Storm Drainage Facilities) Fee .................................................................. 9 Fund 329 – Bridges, Streets, & Traffic Fee ........................................................................................ 12 Fund 331 – Law Enforcement Facilities Fee ...................................................................................... 16 Fund 332 – Fire Facilities Fee............................................................................................................. 19 Fund 361 – Park Development Fee ..................................................................................................... 22 Fund 362 – Valley-Wide Park Development Fee ............................................................................... 25 Fund 363 – Library Facilities Fee ....................................................................................................... 28 Section 3 – Fund Summary ..................................................................................................................... 31 Section 4 – Fiscal Years 2016-2017 through 2020-2021 Five-Year Report ........................................... 33

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 1 of 37
Executive Summary
Development Impact Fees are fees imposed by
local governments on new development projects to
finance the acquisition, construction, and
improvement of public facilities and infrastructure
needed to serve those projects. California state law
requires local agencies to prepare a report on the
status of their Development Impact Fee (DIF)
program on an annual basis and make additional
findings every fifth year. This report meets the
legal requirements for Fiscal Year (FY) 20-21
(July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021) as well as the
five-year report for FY 16-17 through FY 20-21.

The City of Hemet (City) first established its DIF
Program on January 23, 2001 with the adoption of Ordinance No. 1639 which revised and renumbered the City Municipal Code. The fees were established by Ordinance No. 1354 as a part of this revision. The dollar amounts of the fees were originally adopted on January 23, 2001 with Ordinance No. 1639. The fee amounts were last updated by Resolution No. 3837 on July 26, 2004 for non-residential property and Resolution No. 3981 on January 23, 2006 for residential property.

The most recent Nexus Study was prepared by TischlerBise, dated January 3, 2006. City Council adopted Resolution No. 3981, on January 23, 2006, which approved the Nexus Study methodology and amended Resolution No. 3837 as it related to DIFs for residential development projects. Per Resolution 3981, the rates for non-residential projects were not updated as it stated that the City Council shall, by separate and subsequent noticed action, consider adjustments to DIFs for commercial and/or industrial projects. The Valley Wide Facilities Fee Fund was authorized on August 22, 2006, and allocated 16.3% of all new park impact fees. The Public Meeting Facilities Fee is no longer collected.

The City of Hemet currently collects the development impact fees listed in the table below. The table also provides the fund that the fee is deposited into.

Fee Fund
Number
Public Meetings Facilities Fee 315
General Facilities Fee 316
Flood Control Fee (Storm Drainage Facilities Fee) 326
Bridges, Streets, & Traffic Facilities Fee 329
Law Enforcement Facilities Fee 331
Fire Facilities Fee 332
Park Development Fee 361
Valley-Wide Park Development Fee 362
Library Facilities Fee 363
Figure 1 – City of Hemet Welcome Sign

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 2 of 37
Section 1 – Requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act (AB1600) Assembly Bill (AB) 1600, commonly known as the Mitigation Fee Act, was enacted by the state of California in 1987 and created Section 66000 et. seq. of the Government Code and was amended by AB518 and Senate Bill (SB) 1693. AB1600 requires the city to report fee information annually and every fifth year.

Within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, the City must make available the following information from the prior fiscal year:

1. Brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

2. Amount of the fee.

3. Beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.

4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned during the previous year.

5. Identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.

7. Description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and when each loan will be repaid and the rate of interest the account will receive on the loan.

8. Identification of any refunds made once determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund fee-related projects.

For the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the account or fund, and every five years thereafter, the City must make the following findings with respect to any remaining funds in the fee account, regardless of whether those funds are committed or uncommitted:

1. Identification of the purpose to which the fees are to be put.

2. Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged.

3. Identification of all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements identified as part of the City’s annual report.

4. Identification of the approximate dates on which the funding referred to in Requirement 3 is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.

The City must make this information available for public review and must present it at the next regularly scheduled public meeting no less than 15 days after this information is made available to the public. This report is intended to satisfy the annual reporting requirements for FY 20-21 as well as the five-year report for FY 16-17 through FY 20-21. The City previously completed a five-year report in FY 15-16.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 3 of 37
Section 2 – Annual Report
The following section provides information necessary to meet the annual reporting legal requirements for each impact fee fund. This includes a brief description of the fee, the amount of the fee, the beginning and ending balances, fee revenues collected, interest earned, and the expenditures on each project including the percentage that was funded with fees. It also includes a table summary of whether sufficient funds have been identified to complete future projects and the approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if sufficient funds have been identified. Any loans are also identified as well as any refunds from the account.

Fund 315 - Public Meetings Facilities Fee
Requirement 1. Brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

The Public Meetings Facilities Fee finances community centers and public buildings available for community use. This category of buildings differs from general facilities, which are facilities used by the City staff to undertake their municipal service duties. The Public Meetings Facilities Fee was originally established by Ordinance No. 1639, adopted January 23, 2001. The City stopped collecting this fee as of August 2007.

Requirement 2. Amount of the fee.

The Public Meetings Facilities Fee has not been collected since August 2007. Previously collected funds continue to gain interest and the City will use the remaining funds toward future projects identified in Table 1.

Requirement 3. Beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.

Table 1 summarizes the beginning and ending fund balances for the Public Meetings Facilities Fee for FY 20-21.

Requirement 4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned during the previous year.

Table 1 summarizes the fees collected and the interest earned for the Public Meetings Facilities Fee during FY 20-21.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 4 of 37
Table 1: Public Meetings Facilities Fee Fund Summary
Requirement 5. Identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No project expenditures were recorded for Fund 315 in FY 20-21.

Requirement 6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Table 2 summarizes the planned future expenditures for Fund 315 and the anticipated construction start date. As additional funds become available, the City’s Capital Improvement Budget team will work on identifying and budgeting for eligible projects and will include the projects in future Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) budgets.

Fund 315
Public Meetings Facilities
Beginning Fund Balance as of July 1, 2020 $ 423,439.45
Revenues
Fees Collected $ -
Interest Earned $ 1,223.00
Fair Market Value Adjustment1
$ (1,205.25)
Other Revenues $ -
Total Revenues $ 17.75
Expenses
Project Expenses $ -
Other Expenses $ -
Total Expenses $ -
Transfers In $ -
Transfers Out $ (195,618.45)
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2021 $ 227,838.75
1) Fair Market Value Adjustment accounts for changes in value of City investments over time.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 5 of 37
Table 2: Public Meetings Facilities Fee Project Expenditures Requirement 7. Description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and when each will be repaid and the rate of interest the account will receive on the loan.

A transfer in the amount of $195,618.45 was transferred out of Fund 315 during FY 20-21 to correct for the transfer in during FY 19-20 for Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 5667 – Police Facility Security Renovation costs.

Requirement 8. Identification of any refunds made once determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund fee-related projects.

There were no refunds made from this fund in FY 20-21.

Project No. Project Name
Project
Budget1
Fund 315
Expense to
Date
Fund 315
Expense
FY 20-21
Fund 315
Future
Expenditures
% Funded by
Fee
Approx.

Construction
Start Date 1
5631
Library Second Floor Energy Enhancement
Construction/Expansion/Reconfigure
Lighting, Audio/Visual, HVAC ducting
$ - 206,000 - 206,000 $ 100% TBD
GRAND TO TAL 206,000 $ - $ - $ 206,000 $
1) City of Hemet Trial Balance Expenditure Detail FY 20-21.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 6 of 37
Fund 316 - General Facilities Fee
Requirement 1. Brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

The General Facilities Fee finances general office or work facilities and equipment used by City staff to undertake their daily duties. The City first established its DIF Program and the General Facilities Fee on January 23, 2001 with the adoption of Ordinance No. 1639, which revised and renumbered the City Municipal Code. Resolution No. 3837, adopted July 26, 2004, established current fee amounts for non-residential property. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 3981 on January 23, 2006, which established current fee amounts for residential property as recommended by the Nexus Study dated January 3, 2006, prepared by TischlerBise. Per Resolution 3981, the rates for non-residential projects were not updated as it stated that the City Council shall, by separate and subsequent noticed action, consider adjustments to DIFs for commercial and/or industrial projects.

Requirement 2. Amount of the fee.

The General Facilities Fees for FY 20-21 are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3: General Facilities Fee
Land Use Fee Amount
Mobile Home/Senior (per DU) $493
Multi-Family (per DU) $669
Single Family (per DU) $780
Townhome/Duplex (per DU) $591
Commercial/Office (per SF) $0.116
Industrial (per SF) $0.116
Requirement 3. Beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.

Table 4 summarizes the beginning and ending fund balances for the General Facilities Fee for FY 20-21.

Requirement 4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned during the previous year.

Table 4 summarizes the fees collected and the interest earned for the General Facilities Fee during FY 20-21.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 7 of 37
Table 4: General Facilities Fee Fund Summary
Requirement 5. Identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

Table 5 summarizes the expenditures on General Facilities Fee projects for FY 20-21.

Requirement 6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Table 5 summarizes the planned future expenditures for Fund 316 and the anticipated construction start date. As additional funds become available, the City’s Capital Improvement Budget team will work on identifying and budgeting for eligible projects and will include the projects in future CIP budgets.

Fund 316
General Facilities
Beginning Fund Balance as of July 1, 2020 $ 632,612.38
Revenues
Fees Collected $ 173,986.84
Interest Earned $ 3,691.00
Fair Market Value Adjustment1
$ (3,637.87)
Other Revenues $ -
Total Revenues $ 174,039.97
Expenses
Project Expenses $ (31,088.71)
Other Expenses $ -
Total Expenses $ (31,088.71)
Transfers In $ -
Transfers Out $ -
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2021 $ 775,563.64
1) Fair Market Value Adjustment accounts for changes in value of City investments over time.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 8 of 37
Table 5: General Facilities Fee Project Expenditures
Requirement 7. Description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and when each will be repaid and the rate of interest the account will receive on the loan.

There were no transfers or loans from this fund in FY 20-21.

Requirement 8. Identification of any refunds made once determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund fee-related projects.

There were no refunds made from this fund in FY 20-21.

Project No. Project Name
Project
Budget1
Fund 316
Expense to
Date 2
Fund 316
Expense
FY 20-212
Fund 316
Future
Expenditures
% Funded by
Fee
Approx.

Construction
Start Date 1
5667 Police Facility Security Renovation 1,527,000 $ 1,329,264 $ 31,089 $ 82,811 $ 95% In Progress 5721 Clarifier Units for Corporation Yard 107,340 $ - - 107,340 $ 100% TBD TBD Street lights replacement 150,000 $ - - $ 100% 150,000 TBD TBD ADA Compliance Improvements $ 500,000 - - $ 100% 500,000 TBD TBD ERP Upgrades 1,000,000 $ - - $ 100% 1,000,000 TBD
TBD Municipal Building Updates and Expansio $ 500,000 - - $ 100% 500,000 TBD TBD Municipal Building Energy Management
System Update $ - 450,000 - 450,000 $ 100% TBD
GRAND TO TAL 4,234,340 $ 1,329,264 $ 31,089 $ 2,790,151 $ 1) City of Hemet FY 20-21 Annual Operating Budget & FY 14-15 AB1600 Annual and Five-Year Report. 2) City of Hemet Trial Balance Expenditure Detail FY 20-21.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 9 of 37
Fund 326 - Flood Control (Storm Drainage Facilities) Fee Requirement 1. Brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

The Flood Control (Storm Drainage Facilities) Fee finances street gutter facilities, inlets, and a pipeline network of storm drain lines which convey runoff to various smaller lines, creeks, aqueducts, and channels throughout the City. The City first established its DIF Program and the Flood Control Fee on January 23, 2001 with the adoption of Ordinance No. 1639, which revised and renumbered the City Municipal Code. Resolution No. 3837, adopted July 26, 2004, established current fee amounts for non-residential property. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 3981 on January 23, 2006, which established current fee amounts for residential property as recommended by the Nexus Study dated January 3, 2006, prepared by TischlerBise. Per Resolution 3981, the rates for non-residential projects were not updated as it stated that the City Council shall, by separate and subsequent noticed action, consider adjustments to DIFs for commercial and/or industrial projects.

Requirement 2. Amount of the fee.

The Flood Control (Storm Drainage Facilities) Fees for FY 20-21 are summarized in Table 6.

Table 6: Flood Control (Storm Drainage Facilities) Fee
Land Use Fee Amount
Mobile Home/Senior (per DU) $1,147
Multi-Family (per DU) $474
Single Family (per DU) $1,405
Townhome/Duplex (per DU) $1,013
Commercial/Office (per SF) $0.402
Industrial (per SF) $0.344
Requirement 3. Beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.

Table 7 summarizes the beginning and ending fund balances for the Flood Control (Storm Drainage Facilities) Fee for FY 20-21.

Requirement 4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned during the previous year.

Table 7 summarizes the fees collected and the interest earned for the Flood Control Fee during FY 20-21.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 10 of 37
Table 7: Flood Control Fee Fund Summary

Requirement 5. Identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

Table 8 summarizes the expenditures on Flood Control Fee projects for FY 20-21.

Requirement 6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Table 8 summarizes the planned future expenditures for Flood Control Fee and the anticipated construction start date. As additional funds become available, the City’s Capital Improvement Budget team will work on identifying and budgeting for eligible projects and will include the projects in future CIP budgets.

Fund 326
Flood Control
Beginning Fund Balance as of July 1, 2020 $ 3,785,067.09 Revenues
Fees Collected $ 272,207.06
Interest Earned $ 19,024.00
Fair Market Value Adjustment1
$ (18,752.90)
Other Revenues2
$ -
Total Revenues $ 272,478.16
Expenses
Project Expenses $ (5,563.50)
Other Expenses $ -
Total Expenses $ (5,563.50)
Transfers In $ -
Transfers Out $ -
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2021 $ 4,051,981.75
1) Fair Market Value Adjustment accounts for changes in value of City investments over time.
2) Other Revenues consist of miscellaneous accounts receivable paid during this Fiscal Year.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 11 of 37
Table 8: Flood Control Fee Project Expenditures
Requirement 7. Description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and when each will be repaid and the rate of interest the account will receive on the loan.

There were no transfers or loans from this fund in FY 20-21.

Requirement 8. Identification of any refunds made once determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund fee-related projects.

There were no refunds made from this fund in FY 20-21.

Project No. Project Name
Project
Budget1
Fund 326
Expense to
Date 2
Fund 326
Expense
FY 20-212
Fund 326
Future
Expenditures
% Funded by
Fee
Approx.

Construction
Start Date 1
5590 State St Storm Drain Replacement 2,750,000 $ 123,863 $ 615 $ 2,625,522 $ 100% In Progress 5592 Westside Storm Drainage Master Plan $ 35,121 500,000 $ 4,949 $ 459,931 $ 100% In Progress 5638 Drainage Master Plan 1,500,000 $ 72,521 $ - $ 100% In Progress 1,427,479 TBD Storm Drain Maintenance 70,000 $ 13,452 $ - $ 100% In Progress 56,548 TBD Chambers Street Drainage Improveme $ 20,000 - - $ 100% TBD 20,000 TBD Cactus Valley Channel 1,161,081 $ - - $ 100% TBD 1,161,081 TBD Avery Canyon 2,050,776 $ - - $ 100% TBD 2,050,776
TBD Pepper Creek 4,985,758 $ - - $ 100% TBD 4,985,758
TBD Menlo Avenure 1,459,886 $ - - $ 100% TBD 1,459,886
TBD Menlo/Cawston 365,605 $ - - $ 100% TBD 365,605
GRAND TO TAL 14,863,106 $ 244,957 $ 5,564 $ 14,612,586 $ 1) City of Hemet FY 20-21 Annual Operating Budget & FY 14-15 AB1600 Annual and Five-Year Report. 2) City of Hemet Trial Balance Expenditure Detail FY 20-21.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 12 of 37
Fund 329 – Bridges, Streets, & Traffic Fee
Requirement 1. Brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

The Bridges, Streets, & Traffic Fee (previously the Road Facilities Fee) finances highways, roads, bridges, and traffic signals. The City first established its DIF Program and the Bridges, Streets, & Traffic Fee on January 23, 2001 with the adoption of Ordinance No. 1639, which revised and renumbered the City Municipal Code. Resolution No. 3837, adopted July 26, 2004, established current fee amounts for non-residential property. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 3981 on January 23, 2006, which established current fee amounts for residential property as recommended by the Nexus Study dated January 3, 2006, prepared by TischlerBise. Per Resolution 3981, the rates for non-residential projects were not updated as it stated that the City Council shall, by separate and subsequent noticed action, consider adjustments to DIFs for commercial and/or industrial projects.

Requirement 2. Amount of the fee.

The Bridges, Streets, & Traffic Fees for FY 20-21 are summarized in Table 9.

Table 9: Bridges, Streets, & Traffic Fee
Land Use Fee Amount – TUMF Exempt Fee Amount – TUMF Projects Mobile Home/Senior (per DU) $1,537 $1,537
Multi-Family (per DU) $2,030 $2,030
Single Family (per DU) $2,948 $2,948
Townhome/Duplex (per DU) $1,805 $1,805
Commercial/Office (per SF) $2.46 $2.01
Industrial (per SF) $0.414 $0.325
Requirement 3. Beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.

Table 10 summarizes the beginning and ending fund balances for the Bridges, Streets, & Traffic Fee for FY 20-21.

Requirement 4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned during the previous year.

Table 10 summarizes the fees collected and the interest earned for the Bridges, Streets, & Traffic Fee during FY 20-21.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 13 of 37
Table 10: Bridges, Streets, & Traffic Fee Fund Summary
Requirement 5. Identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

Table 11 summarizes the expenditures this past year on Bridges, Streets, & Traffic Fee projects.

Requirement 6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Table 11 summarizes the planned future expenditures for Bridges, Streets, & Traffic Fee and the anticipated construction start date. As additional funds become available, the City’s Capital Improvement Budget team will work on identifying and budgeting for eligible projects and will include the projects in future CIP budgets.

Fund 329
Bridges, Streets, & Traffic
Beginning Fund Balance as of July 1, 2020 $ 2,978,037.90 Revenues
Fees Collected $ 1,139,336.66
Interest Earned $ 26,289.00
Fair Market Value Adjustment1
$ (25,914.38)
Other Revenues2
$ 13,452.46
Intergovernmental Revenue $ -
Total Revenues $ 1,153,163.74
Expenses
Project Expenses $ (52,077.48)
Other Expenses $ -
Total Expenses $ (52,077.48)
Transfers In $ -
Transfers Out $ -
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2021 $ 4,079,124.16
1) Fair Market Value Adjustment accounts for changes in value of City investments over time.
2) Other Revenues consist of miscellaneous accounts receivable paid during this Fiscal Year.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 14 of 37
Table 11: Bridges, Streets, & Traffic Fee Project Expenditures Project No. Project Name
Project
Budget1
Fund 329
Expense to
Date 2
Fund 329
Expense FY
20-212
Fund 329
Future
Expenditures
% Funded by
Fee
Approx.

Construction
Start Date 1
5421 Traffic Signal @ Warren/Esplanade 988,500 $ 535,744 $ - (122,244) $ 42% In Progress 5537 Stetson Ave Bridge Replacement 1,005,000 $ 1,335,123 $ - (1,285,123) $ 5% In Progress 5588 Gilbert St Rehabilitation $ 509,803 703,289 $ - $ 100% In Progress 193,486 5608 Traffic Signal Emitters Retrofit 221,600 $ 166,954 $ - $ 100% In Progress 54,646 5613 Traffic Signal @ Warren & Auto 500,000 $ 351,637 $ 17,969 $ 130,394 $ 100% In Progress 5636 2016/17 Sidewalk & ADA Ramps $ 11,271 252,558 $ - $ 56% In Progress 129,337 5651
HSIP: LED Safety Ligting and Ped Countdown
Signal Heads $ 22,693 1,010,366 $ 11,409 $ 45,364 $ 8% TBD 5669 2017/18 Sidewalk & ADA Ramps $ 78,951 150,000 $ - $ 50% In Progress (3,951) 5689 1819 Missing Link Sidewalks ADA Ramps 10,000 $ 9,516 $ - $ 100% In Progress 484 5639 Update DIF Analysis 300,000 $ - - $ 100% TBD 300,000 5640 System Safety Analysis Improvements 105,000 $ 104,753 $ - $ 100% In Progress 247 5668 Interim Seattle Basin Improvements 194,603 $ 5,397 $ - $ 100% In Progress 189,206 5611 15/16 Pedestrian Pathway Connectivity 225,000 $ 20,567 $ - $ 32% In Progress 51,933 5706 Esplanade Ave Improvements 1,900,000 $ - $ 1,854,602 22,699 $ 100% In Progress 5723 Traffic Signal Installation @ Warren & Devons $ 1,990,000 - - $ 200% TBD 1,854,603 TBD State Street Multi Use Path 774,000 $ - - $ 100% TBD 774,000 TBD State Street Improvements - Florida to Johnsto $ 1,240,000 - - $ 100% TBD 1,240,000 TBD Menlo Widening Project 1,000,000 $ - - $ 100% TBD 1,000,000 TBD Carmalita Parking Improvement 2 80,000 $ - - $ 100% TBD 80,000 TBD Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation 1, $ 750,000 - - $ 100% TBD 1,750,000 TBD Juanita St Improvements 450,000 $ - - $ 100% TBD 450,000 TBD SCE-LED Streetlight Transition 500,000 $ - - $ 100% TBD 500,000 GRAND TO TAL 15, $ 3,152,409 349,916 $ 52,077 $ 9,186,983 $ 1) City of Hemet FY 20-21 Annual Operating Budget & FY 14-15 AB1600 Annual and Five-Year Report, FY 22-23 CIP Budget. 2) City of Hemet Trial Balance Expenditure Detail FY 20-21.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 15 of 37
Requirement 7. Description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and when each will be repaid and the rate of interest the account will receive on the loan.

There were no transfers or loans from this fund in FY 20-21.

Requirement 8. Identification of any refunds made once determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund fee-related projects.

There were no refunds made from this fund in FY 20-21.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 16 of 37
Fund 331 – Law Enforcement Facilities Fee
Requirement 1. Brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

The Law Enforcement Facilities Fee finances law enforcement facilities, including law enforcement stations, vehicles and vehicle equipment, officer apparel and equipment, and communications and electronic equipment. The City first established its DIF Program and the Law Enforcement Facilities Fee on January 23, 2001 with the adoption of Ordinance No. 1639, which revised and renumbered the City Municipal Code. Resolution No. 3837, adopted July 26, 2004, established current fee amounts for non-residential property. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 3981 on January 23, 2006, which established current fee amounts for residential property as recommended by the Nexus Study dated January 3, 2006, prepared by TischlerBise. Per Resolution 3981, the rates for non-residential projects were not updated as it stated that the City Council shall, by separate and subsequent noticed action, consider adjustments to DIFs for commercial and/or industrial projects.

Requirement 2. Amount of the fee.

The Law Enforcement Facilities Fees for FY 20-21 are summarized in Table 12.

Table 12: Law Enforcement Facilities Fee
Land Use Fee Amount
Mobile Home/Senior (per DU) $298
Multi-Family (per DU) $404
Single Family (per DU) $471
Townhome/Duplex (per DU) $357
Commercial/Office (per SF) $0.223
Industrial (per SF) $0.013
Requirement 3. Beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.

Table 13 summarizes the beginning and ending fund balances for the Law Enforcement Facilities Fee for FY 20-21.

Requirement 4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned during the previous year.

Table 13 summarizes the fees collected and the interest earned for the Law Enforcement Facilities Fee during FY 20-21.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 17 of 37
Table 13: Law Enforcement Facilities Fee Fund Summary
Requirement 5. Identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No project expenditures were recorded for Fund 331 in FY 20-21.

Requirement 6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Table 14 summarizes the planned future expenditures for Fund 331 and the anticipated construction start date. As additional funds become available, the City’s Capital Improvement Budget team will work on identifying and budgeting for eligible projects and will include the projects in future CIP budgets.

Fund 331
Law Enforcement Facilities
Beginning Fund Balance as of July 1, 2020 $ 55,903.76
Revenues
Fees Collected $ 106,436.77
Interest Earned $ 574.00
Fair Market Value Adjustment1
$ (565.46)
Other Revenues $ -
Total Revenues $ 106,445.31
Expenses
Project Expenses $ -
Other Expenses $ -
Total Expenses $ -
Transfers In $ -
Transfers Out $ -
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2021 $ 162,349.07
1) Fair Market Value Adjustment accounts for changes in value of City investments over time.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 18 of 37
Table 14: Law Enforcement Facilities Fee Project Expenditures Requirement 7. Description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and when each will be repaid and the rate of interest the account will receive on the loan.

There were no transfers or loans from this fund in FY 20-21.

Requirement 8. Identification of any refunds made once determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund fee-related projects.

There were no refunds made from this fund in FY 20-21.

Project No. Project Name
Project
Budget1
Fund 331
Expense to
Date 2
Fund 331
Expense
FY 20-212
Fund 331
Future
Expenditures
% Funded by
Fee
Approx.

Construction
Start Date 1
5667 Police Facility Security Renovation 1,527,000 $ 83,837 $ - - 5% In Progress TBD Server Migration/Upgrades - Comtronix $ 82,825 - - $ 100% TBD 82,825 TBD Evidence Building - Design Phase 29,137 $ - - $ 100% TBD 29,137 GRAND TO TAL 1,638,962 $ 83,837 $ - $ 111,962 $
1) City of Hemet FY 20-21 Annual Operating Budget & FY 14-15 AB1600 Annual and Five-Year Report. 2) City of Hemet Trial Balance Expenditure Detail FY 20-21.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 19 of 37
Fund 332 – Fire Facilities Fee
Requirement 1. Brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

The Fire Facilities Fee finances fire suppression
facilities, including fire stations, response and
prevention vehicles and equipment, and firefighter
apparel and equipment. The City first established
its DIF Program and the Fire Facilities Fee on
January 23, 2001 with the adoption of Ordinance
No. 1639, which revised and renumbered the City
Municipal Code. Resolution No. 3837, adopted
July 26, 2004, established current fee amounts for
non-residential property. The City Council
adopted Resolution No. 3981 on January 23, 2006,
which established current fee amounts for
residential property as recommended by the Nexus Study dated January 3, 2006, prepared by TischlerBise. Per Resolution 3981, the rates for non-residential projects were not updated as it stated that the City Council shall, by separate and subsequent noticed action, consider adjustments to DIFs for commercial and/or industrial projects.

Requirement 2. Amount of the fee.

The Fire Facilities Fees for FY 20-21 are summarized in Table 15.

Table 15: Fire Facilities Fee
Land Use Fee Amount
Mobile Home/Senior (per DU) $354
Multi-Family (per DU) $480
Single Family (per DU) $560
Townhome/Duplex (per DU) $424
Commercial/Office (per SF) $0.24
Industrial (per SF) $0.056
Requirement 3. Beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.

Table 16 summarizes the beginning and ending fund balances for the Fire Facilities Fee for FY 20-21.

Requirement 4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned during the previous year.

Table 16 summarizes the fees collected and the interest earned for the Fire Facilities Fee during FY 20-21.

Figure 2: Hemet Fire Department Engine

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 20 of 37
Table 16: Fire Facilities Fee Fund Summary
Requirement 5. Identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No project expenditures were recorded for Fund 332 in FY 20-21.

Requirement 6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Table 17 summarizes the planned future expenditures for Fire Facilities Fee and the anticipated construction start date. As additional funds become available, the City’s Capital Improvement Budget team will work on identifying and budgeting for eligible projects and will include the projects in future CIP budgets.

Fund 332
Fire Facilities
Beginning Fund Balance as of July 1, 2020 $ 3,531,431.23 Revenues
Fees Collected $ 126,317.60
Interest Earned $ 6,526.00
Fair Market Value Adjustment1
$ (6,433.41)
Other Revenues $ -
Total Revenues $ 126,410.19
Expenses
Project Expenses $ -
Other Expenses2
$ (57,863.29)
Total Expenses $ (57,863.29)
Transfers In $ -
Transfers Out $ -
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2021 $ 3,599,978.13
1) Fair Market Value Adjustment accounts for changes in value of City investments over time.
2) Other Expenses include costs for purchase of equipment and supplies outside of CIP projects.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 21 of 37
Table 17: Fire Facilities Fee Project Expenditures
Requirement 7. Description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and when each will be repaid and the rate of interest the account will receive on the loan.

There were no transfers or loans from this fund in FY 20-21.

Requirement 8. Identification of any refunds made once determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund fee-related projects.

There were no refunds made from this fund in FY 20-21.

Project No. Project Name
Project
Budget1
Fund 332
Expense to
Date 2
Fund 332
Expense
FY 20-212
Fund 332
Future
Expenditures
% Funded by
Fee
Approx.

Construction
Start Date 1
5610 Fire Station #5 Improvements $ 25,458 175,000 $ - $ 100% In Progress 149,542 5643 Fire Station #1 Batt Chief Area Remodel 95,000 $ 51,888 $ - $ 100% In Progress 43,112 5679 Fire Station Facility Upgrades 57,222 $ - - $ 100% TBD 57,222 TBD Fire Station #6 Construction 1,932,847 $ - - $ 100% TBD 1,932,847 TBD Misc tools, fire fighting equipment 27,373 $ - - $ 100% TBD 27,373 TBD Electronic Patient Care Reporting Tablets (EPCR) $ 40,000 - - $ 100% TBD 40,000 GRAND TO TAL 2,327,442 $ 77,347 $ - $ 2,250,095 $
1) City of Hemet FY 20-21 Annual Operating Budget & FY 14-15 AB1600 Annual and Five-Year Report. 2) City of Hemet Trial Balance Expenditure Detail FY 20-21.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 22 of 37
Fund 361 – Park Development Fee
Requirement 1. Brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

The Park Development Fee (formerly the Parks and
Recreation Facilities Fee) finances parks and
recreational facilities. The City first established its DIF Program and the Park Development Fee on January 23,
2001 with the adoption of Ordinance No. 1639, which
revised and renumbered the City Municipal Code. The
City Council adopted Resolution No. 3981 on January
23, 2006, which established current fee amounts for
residential property as recommended by the Nexus
Study dated January 3, 2006, prepared by TischlerBise.

Requirement 2. Amount of the fee.

The Park Development Fees for FY 20-21 are summarized in Table 18.

Table 18: Park Development Fee
Land Use Fee Amount
Mobile Home/Senior (per DU) $920
Multi-Family (per DU) $1,247
Single Family (per DU) $1,453
Townhome/Duplex (per DU) $1,101
Requirement 3. Beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.

Table 19 summarizes the beginning and ending fund balances for the Park Development Fee for FY 20-21.

Requirement 4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned during the previous year.

Table 19 summarizes the fees collected and the interest earned for the Park Development Fee during FY 20-21.

Figure 3: Weston Park

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 23 of 37
Table 19: Park Development Fee Fund Summary
Requirement 5. Identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No project expenditures were recorded for Fund 361 in FY 20-21.

Requirement 6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Table 20 summarizes the planned future expenditures for Park Development Fee and the anticipated construction start date. As additional funds become available, the City’s Capital Improvement Budget team will work on identifying and budgeting for eligible projects and will include the projects in future CIP budgets.

Fund 361
Park Development
Beginning Fund Balance as of July 1, 2020 $ 1,797,619.98 Revenues
Fees Collected $ 198,671.00
Interest Earned $ 10,053.00
Fair Market Value Adjustment1
$ (9,910.01)
Other Revenues $ -
Total Revenues $ 198,813.99
Expenses
Project Expenses $ -
Other Expenses2
$ (69,357.50)
Total Expenses $ (69,357.50)
Transfers In $ -
Transfers Out $ -
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2021 $ 1,927,076.47
1) Fair Market Value Adjustment accounts for changes in value of City investments over time.
2) Other Expenses include costs for purchase of equipment and supplies outside of CIP projects.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 24 of 37
Table 20: Park Development Fee Project Expenditures
Requirement 7. Description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and when each will be repaid and the rate of interest the account will receive on the loan.

There were no transfers or loans from this fund in FY 20-21.

Requirement 8. Identification of any refunds made once determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund fee-related projects.

There were no refunds made from this fund in FY 20-21.

Project No. Project Name
Project
Budget1
Fund 361
Expense to
Date 2
Fund 361
Expense
FY 20-212
Fund 361
Future
Expenditures
% Funded by
Fee
Approx.

Construction
Start Date 1
TBD Skate Park 400,000 $ 1,623 $ - $ 100% TBD 398,377
TBD City-wide Park Master Plan 300,000 $ - - $ 100% TBD 300,000 TBD Salt Creek Trail Project 500,000 $ - - $ 100% TBD 500,000 TBD Splash Park 200,000 $ - - $ 100% TBD 200,000
TBD Handi-capable Park Play Area 175,000 $ - - $ 100% TBD 175,000 GRAND TO TAL 1,575,000 $ 1,623 $ - $ 1,573,377 $
1) City of Hemet FY 20-21 Annual Operating Budget & FY 14-15 AB1600 Annual and Five-Year Report. 2) City of Hemet Trial Balance Expenditure Detail FY 20-21.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 25 of 37
Fund 362 – Valley-Wide Park Development Fee
Requirement 1. Brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

The Valley-Wide Park Development Fee finances improvements at Diamond Valley Lake Community Park, which is owned and operated by Valley Wide Recreation and Park District. The City first established its DIF Program on January 23, 2001 with the adoption of Ordinance No. 1639, which revised and renumbered the City Municipal Code. The Valley Wide Facilities Fee Fund was authorized on August 22, 2006 and was allocated 16.3% of all new Park Development impact fees.

Requirement 2. Amount of the fee.

The Valley-Wide Park Development Fees for FY 20-21 are summarized in Table 21.

Table 21: Valley-Wide Park Development Fee
Land Use Fee Amount
Mobile Home/Senior (per DU) $179
Multi-Family (per DU) $243
Single Family (per DU) $283
Townhome/Duplex (per DU) $214
Requirement 3. Beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.

Table 22 summarizes the beginning and ending fund balances for the Valley-Wide Park Development Fee for FY 20-21.

Requirement 4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned during the previous year.

Table 22 summarizes the fees collected and the interest earned for the Valley-Wide Park Development Fee during FY 20-21.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 26 of 37
Table 22: Valley-Wide Park Development Fee Fund Summary Requirement 5. Identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No project expenditures were recorded for Fund 362 in FY 20-21.

Requirement 6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Table 23 summarizes the planned future expenditures for Valley-Wide Park Development Fee and the anticipated construction start date. As additional funds become available, the City’s Capital Improvement Budget team will work on identifying and budgeting for eligible projects and will include the projects in future CIP budgets.

Fund 362
Valley-Wide Park Development
Beginning Fund Balance as of July 1, 2020 $ 119,961.87
Revenues
Fees Collected $ 41,529.00
Interest Earned $ 741.00
Fair Market Value Adjustment1
$ (730.32)
Other Revenues $ -
Total Revenues $ 41,539.68
Expenses
Project Expenses $ -
Other Expenses $ -
Total Expenses $ -
Transfers In $ -
Transfers Out $ -
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2021 $ 161,501.55
1) Fair Market Value Adjustment accounts for changes in value of City investments over time.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 27 of 37
Table 23: Valley-Wide Park Development Fee Project Expenditures Requirement 7. Description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and when each will be repaid and the rate of interest the account will receive on the loan.

There were no transfers or loans from this fund in FY 20-21.

Requirement 8. Identification of any refunds made once determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund fee-related projects.

There were no refunds made from this fund in FY 20-21.

Project No. Project Name
Project
Budget1
Fund 362
Expense to
Date
Fund 362
Expense
FY 20-21
Fund 362
Future
Expenditures
% Funded by
Fee
Approx.

Construction
Start Date 1
TBD
Park expansion in coordination with Valley Wide
Recreation & Parks - proposed Park Master Plan
land purchase and facilities - City Portion
$ - 150,000 - 150,000 $ 100% TBD
GRAND TO TAL 150,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 $
1) City of Hemet FY 14-15 AB1600 Annual and Five-Year Report.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 28 of 37
Fund 363 – Library Facilities Fee
Requirement 1. Brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

The Library Facilities Fee finances library facilities. The Library Facilities Fee was originally established by Ordinance No. 1639, adopted January 23, 2001. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 3981 on January 23, 2006, which established current fee amounts for residential property as recommended by the Nexus Study dated January 3, 2006 prepared by TischlerBise Fiscal, Economic, and Planning Consultants. Resolution No. 3837, adopted July 26, 2004, established current fee amounts for non-residential property Requirement 2. Amount of the fee.

The Library Facilities Fees for FY 20-21 are summarized in Table 24.

Table 24: Library Facilities Fee
Land Use Fee Amount
Mobile Home/Senior (per DU) $465
Multi-Family (per DU) $631
Single Family (per DU) $735
Townhome/Duplex (per DU) $557
Requirement 3. Beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.

Table 25 summarizes the beginning and ending fund balances for the Library Facilities Fee for FY 20-21.

Requirement 4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned during the previous year.

Table 25 summarizes the fees collected and the interest earned for the Library Facilities Fee during FY 20-21.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 29 of 37
Table 25: Library Facilities Fee Fund Summary
Requirement 5. Identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No project expenditures were recorded for Fund 363 in FY 20-21.

Requirement 6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Table 26 summarizes the planned future expenditures for Library Facilities Fee and the anticipated construction start date. As additional funds become available, the City’s Capital Improvement Budget team will work on identifying and budgeting for eligible projects and will include the projects in future CIP budgets.

Fund 363
Library Facilities
Beginning Fund Balance as of July 1, 2020 $ 577,500.29
Revenues
Fees Collected $ 162,976.00
Interest Earned $ 3,279.00
Fair Market Value Adjustment1
$ (3,232.45)
Other Revenues $ 3,474.00
Total Revenues $ 166,496.55
Expenses
Project Expenses $ -
Other Expenses2
$ (104,623.61)
Total Expenses $ (104,623.61)
Transfers In $ -
Transfers Out $ -
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2021 $ 639,373.23
1) Fair Market Value Adjustment accounts for changes in value of City investments over time.
2) Other Expenses include costs for purchase of equipment and supplies outside of CIP projects.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 30 of 37
Table 26: Library Facilities Fee Project Expenditures
Requirement 7. Description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and when each will be repaid and the rate of interest the account will receive on the loan.

There were no transfers or loans from this fund in FY 20-21.

Requirement 8. Identification of any refunds made once determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund fee-related projects.

There were no refunds made from this fund in FY 20-21.

Project No. Project Name
Project
Budget1
Fund 363
Expense to
Date
Fund 363
Expense
FY 20-21
Fund 363
Future
Expenditures
% Funded by
Fee
Approx.

Construction
Start Date 1
TBD Capital outlay for books, audio visual materials,
databases for patron use $ - 350,000 - 350,000 $ 100% TBD TBD Solar parking covers 400,000 $ - - 400,000 $ 100% TBD TBD Energy upgrades: Chilllers, Energy Management
System $ - 650,000 - 650,000 $ 100% TBD
TBD Generator 200,000 $ - - 200,000 $ 100% TBD
TBD Exterior book vending device 200,000 $ - - 200,000 $ 100% TBD TBD Early Learning Center 50,000 $ - - 50,000 $ 100% TBD GRAND TO TAL 1,850,000 $ - $ - $ 1,850,000 $
1) City of Hemet FY 20-21 Annual Operating Budget & FY 14-15 AB1600 Annual and Five-Year Report.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 31 of 37
Section 3 – Fund Summary
Table 27 provides an accounting of each impact fee fund and a total impact fee account balance. The table summarizes the starting fund balance, the amount of fees collected, the interest earned, the total expenditures, and the fiscal year ending fund balance.

17.P

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report City of Hemet Page 32 of 37 Table 27: Development Impact Fee Fund Summary
Description
Public Meetings
Facilities
General
Facilities Flood Control
Bridges &
Streets
Law Enforcement
Facilities Fire Facilities
Park
Development
Valley-Wide Park
Development Library Facilities
Fund No. 315 316 326 329 331 332 361 362 363
Starting Balance
As of July 1, 2020 423,439 $ 632,612 $ 3,785,067 $ 2,978,038 $ 55,904 $ 3,531,431.23 $ 1,797,620 $ 119,962 $ 577,500 $

REVENUES
Fees Collected - $ 173,987 $ 272,207 $ 1,139,337 $ 106,437 $ 126,317.60 $ 198,671 $ 41,529 $ 162,976 $ Interest Earned 1,223 $ 3,691 $ 19,024 $ 26,289 $ 574 $ 6,526 $ 10,053 $ 741 $ 3,279 $ Fair Market Value Adjustment (1,205) $ (3,638) $ (18,753) $ (25,914) $ (565) $ (6,433) $ (9,910) $ (730) $ (3,232) $ Misc Revenue - $ - $ - $ 13,452 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,474 $ Intergovernmental Revenue - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Total Revenues 18 $ 174,040 $ 272,478 $ 1,153,164 $ 106,445 $ 126,410 $ 198,814 $ 41,540 $ 166,497 $

EXPENDITURES
Project Expenditures - $ (31,089) $ (5,564) $ (52,077) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Other Expenditures1 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ (57,863) $ (69,358) $ - $ (104,624) $ Total Expenditures - $ (31,089) $ (5,564) $ (52,077) $ - $ (57,863) $ (69,358) $ - $ (104,624) $ Transfers in $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Transfers Out $ - (195,618) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Net Transfers (195,618) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Ending Balance
As of June 30, 2021 $ 775,564 227,839 $ 4,051,982 $ 4,079,124 $ 162,349 $ 3,599,978 $ 1,927,076 $ 161,502 $ 639,373 $ 1) Other Expenditures include expenses for printing, professional services, equipment purchases, library services, operating supplies & services, etc.Note: Small variances may appear due to rounding.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 33 of 37
Section 4 – Fiscal Years 2016-2017 through 2020-2021 Five-Year Report
In accordance with Government Code Section 66001, this section addresses the five-year requirements with respect to any remaining funds in the DIF accounts, regardless of whether those funds are committed or uncommitted for FY 16-17 through FY 20-21. The City last completed the Five-Year Report in FY 15-16.

The following section provides information necessary to meet the legal requirement for the Five-Year report for the DIF funds.

Requirement 1. Identification of the purpose to which the fees are to be put.

The purpose of the DIFs imposed and collected on new development within the City during FY 16- 17 through FY 20-21 was to fund public facilities that are needed to serve the new development within the City as identified in the City’s adopted Development Impact Fee Study. The most recent City of Hemet Development Impact Fee Nexus Study was prepared by TischlerBise, dated January 3, 2006. City Council adopted Resolution No. 3981, on January 23, 2006, which approved the Nexus Study methodology and amended Resolution No. 3837 as it related to Development Impact Fees for Residential Development Projects. Each fee had to undergo rigorous nexus requirements that: identify the purpose of the fee; identify the use to which the fee is to be put; determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fees use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed; determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed; and determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. The purpose of each fee is identified within Section 2 of the Annual AB1600 Report. Future Projects are Identified in the Nexus Study and Table 29 of this report.

Requirement 2. Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged.

As mentioned for Requirement 1, the most recent City of Hemet Development Impact Fee Nexus Study was prepared by TischlerBise; dated January 3, 2006. City Council adopted Resolution No. 3981, on January 23, 2006, which approved the Nexus Study methodology and amended Resolution No. 3837 as it related to Development Impact Fees for Residential Development Projects. The 2006 Nexus Study methodology illustrated the roughly proportional, reasonable relationship between the new development upon which the DIFs are charged and the need for the additional facilities by taking into account the additional residents and employees that will be generated by new development within the City and the need for additional infrastructure to accommodate growth.

DIFs charged on new development are used to fund the additional facilities that will serve the residents and employees generated from new development. The 2006 Nexus Study developed the

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 34 of 37
relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged and that relationship has still been deemed valid. The City should consider an update of the fee program in the future due to the time that has passed since the fees were adopted.

Requirement 3. Identification of all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements identified as part of the City’s annual report.

Table 28 summarizes the fund balance for each fund as of June 30, 2021, as well as the costs of the pending facility projects currently identified in the City’s Capital Improvement Plans. The future project costs by fund are shown in further detail on Table 29. Due to the fact that improvements are triggered based on the timing and location of development, improvements will be programmed as deemed necessary by the City. These improvements will be included in the City’s The City’s Capital Improvement Plan as they are identified and funding becomes available.

Table 28: DIF Funding Balances and Future Project Costs Requirement 4. Identification of the approximate dates on which the funding referred to in Requirement 3 is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.

Table 29 lists the public improvement projects within each DIF fund that are anticipated to be constructed using the DIF funds. Anticipated construction start date is listed when available. Due to CIP priority shifts due to the uncertainty of the timing and location of new development, anticipated construction times vary and may be listed as to be determined (TBD) until additional information is gathered and priorities identified.

Fund No. Fund Fund Balance as
of June 30, 2021
Future Project
Costs
315 Public Meetings Facilities Fee $227,838.75 $206,000.00 316 General Facilities Fee $775,563.64 $2,790,150.79
326 Flood Control Fee $4,051,981.75 $14,612,585.75
329 Bridges, Streets, & Traffic Fee $4,079,124.16 $9,186,983.44 331 Law Enforcement Facilities Fee $162,349.07 $111,962.00 332 Fire Facilities Fee $3,599,978.13 $2,250,095.17
361 Park Development Fee $1,927,076.47 $1,573,376.58
362 Valley Wide Development Fee $161,501.55 $150,000.00 363 Library Facilities Fee $639,373.23 $1,850,000.00
TOTAL $15,624,786.75 $32,731,153.73

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 35 of 37
Table 29: Future DIF Projects by Fund and Anticipated Construction Date

Fund
No. Project Project No. Project Budget DIF Portion
Other
Funding
Sources
Portion
Other
Funding
Sources
Estimated
Construction
Date
315
Library Second Floor Energy
Enhancement
Construction/Expansion/Reconfigure
Lighting, Audio/Visual, HVAC ducting
5631 $206,000.00 $206,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD
Police Facility Security Renovation 5667 $1,527,000.00 $1,443,163.00 $83,837.00 Fund 331 In Progress Clarifier Units for Corporation Yard 5721 $107,340.00 $107,340.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Street lights replacement TBD $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD ADA Compliance Improvements TBD $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD ERP Upgrades TBD $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Municipal Building Updates and Expansion TBD $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Municipal Building Energy Management
System Update TBD $450,000.00 $450,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD State St Storm Drain Replacement 5590 $2,750,000.00 $2,750,000.00 $0.00 n/a In Progress Westside Storm Drainage Master Plan 5592 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $0.00 n/a In Progress Drainage Master Plan 5638 $1,500,000.00 $1,500,000.00 $0.00 n/a In Progress Storm Drain Maintenance TBD $70,000.00 $70,000.00 $0.00 n/a In Progress Chambers Street Drainage Improvements TBD $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Cactus Valley Channel TBD $1,161,081.00 $1,161,081.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Avery Canyon TBD $2,050,776.00 $2,050,776.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Pepper Creek TBD $4,985,758.00 $4,985,758.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Menlo Avenure TBD $1,459,886.00 $1,459,886.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Menlo/Cawston TBD $365,605.00 $365,605.00 $0.00 n/a TBD 316
326

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 36 of 37
Table 29: Future DIF Projects by Fund and Anticipated Construction Date (continued) Fund
No. Project Project No. Project Budget DIF Portion
Other
Funding
Sources
Portion
Other
Funding
Sources
Estimated
Construction
Date
Traffic Signal @ Warren/Esplanade 5421 $988,500.00 $413,500.00 $575,000.00 Soboba Tribal Grant; Riverside County In Progress
Stetson Ave Bridge Replacement 5537 $1,005,000.00 $50,000.00 $955,000.00 HBRRP Fed Grant In Progress Gilbert St Rehabilitation 5588 $703,289.00 $703,289.00 $0.00 n/a In Progress Traffic Signal Emitters Retrofit 5608 $221,600.00 $221,600.00 $0.00 n/a In Progress Traffic Signal @ Warren & Auto 5613 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $0.00 n/a In Progress 2016/17 Sidewalk & ADA Ramps 5636 $252,558.00 $140,608.00 $111,950.00 CDBG In Progress HSIP: LED Safety Ligting and Ped
Countdown Signal Heads 5651 $1,010,366.00 $79,466.00 $930,900.00 HSIP TBD 2017/18 Sidewalk & ADA Ramps 5669 $150,000.00 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 In Progress 1819 Missing Link Sidewalks ADA Ramps 5689 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 n/a In Progress Update DIF Analysis 5639 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD System Safety Analysis Improvements 5640 $105,000.00 $105,000.00 $0.00 n/a In Progress Interim Seattle Basin Improvements 5668 $194,603.00 $194,603.00 $0.00 n/a In Progress 15/16 Pedestrian Pathway Connectivity 5611 $225,000.00 $72,500.00 $152,500.00 In Progress Esplanade Ave Improvements 5706 $1,900,000.00 $1,900,000.00 $0.00 n/a In Progress Traffic Signal Installation @ Warren &
Devonshire 5723 $1,990,000.00 $1,990,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD State Street Multi Use Path TBD $774,000.00 $774,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD State Street Improvements - Florida to
Johnston TBD $1,240,000.00 $1,240,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD
Menlo Widening Project TBD $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Carmalita Parking Improvement 2 TBD $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation TBD $1,750,000.00 $1,750,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Juanita St Improvements TBD $450,000.00 $450,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD SCE-LED Streetlight Transition TBD $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD 329

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 37 of 37
Table 29: Future DIF Projects by Fund and Anticipated Construction Date (continued) Fund
No. Project Project No. Project Budget DIF Portion
Other
Funding
Sources
Portion
Other
Funding
Sources
Estimated
Construction
Date
Police Facility Security Renovation 5667 $1,527,000.00 $83,837.00 $1,443,163.00 Fund 316 In Progress Server Migration/Upgrades - Comtronix TBD $82,825.00 $82,825.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Evidence Building - Design Phase TBD $29,137.00 $29,137.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Fire Station #5 Improvements 5610 $175,000.00 $175,000.00 $0.00 n/a In Progress Fire Station #1 Batt Chief Area Remodel 5643 $95,000.00 $95,000.00 $0.00 n/a In Progress Fire Station Facility Upgrades 5679 $57,222.00 $57,222.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Fire Station #6 Construction TBD $1,932,847.00 $1,932,847.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Misc tools, fire fighting equipment TBD $27,373.00 $27,373.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Electronic Patient Care Reporting Tablets
(EPCR) TBD $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD
Skate Park TBD $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD
City-wide Park Master Plan TBD $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Salt Creek Trail Project TBD $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD Splash Park TBD $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD
Handi-capable Park Play Area TBD $175,000.00 $175,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD 362
Park expansion in coordination with Valley
Wide Recreation & Parks - proposed Park
Master Plan land purchase and facilities -
City Portion
TBD $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $0.00 n/a TBD
331
332
361

17.P

Development Impact Fee
Annual Report
City of Hemet
For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022
Prepared by:
22 Executive Park | Irvine, CA | 92614

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 Section 1 – Requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act (AB1600) ............................................................... 2 Section 2 – Annual Report ........................................................................................................................ 3 Fund 315 – Public Meetings Facilities Fee ........................................................................................... 3 Fund 316 – General Facilities Fee ........................................................................................................ 6 Fund 326 – Flood Control (Storm Drainage Facilities) Fee ................................................................. 9 Fund 329 – Bridges, Streets, & Traffic Fee ........................................................................................ 12 Fund 331 – Law Enforcement Facilities Fee ...................................................................................... 16 Fund 332 – Fire Facilities Fee............................................................................................................. 19 Fund 361 – Park Development Fee ..................................................................................................... 22 Fund 362 – Valley-Wide Park Development Fee ............................................................................... 25 Section 3 – Fund Summary ..................................................................................................................... 31

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 1 of 32
Executive Summary
Development Impact Fees are fees imposed
by local governments on new development
projects to finance the acquisition,
construction, and improvement of public
facilities and infrastructure needed to serve
those projects. California state law requires
local agencies to prepare a report on the
status of their Development Impact Fee
(DIF) Program on an annual basis and make
additional findings every fifth year. This
report meets the legal requirements for Fiscal
Year (FY) 21-22 (July 1, 2021 through June
30, 2022).

The City of Hemet (City) first established its DIF Program on January 23, 2001 with the adoption of Ordinance No. 1639 which revised and renumbered the City Municipal Code. The fees were established by Ordinance No. 1354 as a part of this revision. The dollar amounts of the fees were originally adopted on January 23, 2001 with Ordinance No. 1639. The fee amounts were last updated by Resolution No. 3837 on July 26, 2004 for non-residential property and Resolution No. 3981 on January 23, 2006 for residential property.

The most recent Nexus Study was prepared by TischlerBise, dated January 3, 2006. City Council adopted Resolution No. 3981, on January 23, 2006, which approved the Nexus Study methodology and amended Resolution No. 3837 as it related to DIFs for residential development projects. Per Resolution 3981, the rates for non-residential projects were not updated as it stated that the City Council shall, by separate and subsequent noticed action, consider adjustments to DIFs for commercial and/or industrial projects. The Valley Wide Facilities Fee Fund was authorized on August 22, 2006, and allocated 16.3% of all new park impact fees. The Public Meeting Facilities Fee is no longer collected.

The City of Hemet currently collects the development impact fees listed in the table below. The table also provides the fund that the fee is deposited into.

Fee Fund Number
Public Meetings Facilities Fee 315
General Facilities Fee 316
Flood Control Fee (Storm Drainage Facilities Fee) 326
Bridges, Streets, & Traffic Fee 329
Law Enforcement Facilities Fee 331
Fire Facilities Fee 332
Park Development Fee 361
Valley-Wide Park Development Fee 362
Library Facilities Fee 363
Figure 1 – City of Hemet Welcome Sign

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 2 of 32
Section 1 – Requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act (AB1600) Assembly Bill (AB) 1600, commonly known as the Mitigation Fee Act, was enacted by the state of California in 1987 and created Section 66000 et. seq. of the Government Code and was amended by Assembly Bill 518 and Senate Bill (SB) 1693. AB1600 requires the city to report fee information annually and every fifth year. Within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, the City must make available the following information from the prior fiscal year:

1. Brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

2. Amount of the fee.

3. Beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.

4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned during the previous year.

5. Identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.

7. Description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and when each loan will be repaid and the rate of interest the account will receive on the loan.

8. Identification of any refunds made once determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund fee-related projects.

For the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the account or fund, and every five years thereafter, the City must make the following findings with respect to any remaining funds in the fee account, regardless of whether those funds are committed or uncommitted:

1. Identification of the purpose to which the fees are to be put.

2. Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged.

3. Identification of all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements identified as part of the City’s annual report.

4. Identification of the approximate dates on which the funding referred to in Requirement 3 is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.

The City must make this information available for public review and must present it at the next regularly scheduled public meeting no less than 15 days after this information is made available to the public. This report is intended to satisfy the annual reporting requirements for FY 21-22.

This report does not include the five-year reporting requirements. The City previously completed a fiveyear report in FY 15-16 and is currently completing a five-year report with the FY 20-21 annual report.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 3 of 32
Section 2 – Annual Report
The following section provides information necessary to meet the legal requirements for each impact fee fund. This includes a brief description of the fee, the amount of the fee, the beginning and ending balances, fee revenues collected, interest earned, and the expenditures on each project including the percentage that was funded with fees. It also includes a table summary of whether sufficient funds have been identified to complete future projects and the approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if sufficient funds have been identified. Any loans are also identified as well as any refunds from the account.

Fund 315 – Public Meetings Facilities Fee
Requirement 1. Brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

The Public Meetings Facilities Fee finances community centers and public buildings available for community use. This category of buildings differs from general facilities, which are facilities used by the City staff to undertake their municipal service duties. The Public Meetings Facilities Fee was originally established by Ordinance No. 1639, adopted January 23, 2001. The City stopped collecting this fee as of August 2007.

Requirement 2. Amount of the fee.

The Public Meetings Facilities Fee has not been collected since August 2007. Previously collected funds continue to gain interest and the City will use the remaining funds toward future projects identified in Table 1.

Requirement 3. Beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.

Table 1 summarizes the beginning and ending fund balances for the Public Meetings Facilities Fee for FY 21-22.

Requirement 4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned during the previous year.

Table 1 summarizes the fees collected and the interest earned for the Public Meetings Facilities Fee during FY 21-22.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 4 of 32
Table 1: Public Meetings Facilities Fee Fund Summary
Requirement 5. Identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No project expenditures were recorded for Fund 315 in FY 21-22.

Requirement 6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Table 2 summarizes the planned future expenditures for Fund 315 and the anticipated construction start date. As additional funds become available, the City’s Capital Improvement Budget team will work on identifying and budgeting for eligible projects and will include the projects in future Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budgets.

Fund 315
Public Meetings Facilities
Beginning Fund Balance as of July 1, 2021 $ 227,838.75
Revenues
Fees Collected $ -
Interest Earned $ 1,240.00
Fair Market Value Adjustment1
$ (4,947.62)
Other Revenues $ -
Total Revenues $ (3,707.62)
Expenses
Project Expenses $ -
Other Expenses2
$ (4,445.00)
Total Expenses $ (4,445.00)
Transfers In $ -
Transfers Out $ -
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2022 $ 219,686.13
1) Fair Market Value Adjustment accounts for changes in value of City investments over time.
2) Other Expenses include costs for consultant services for reporting requirements.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 5 of 32
Table 2: Public Meetings Facilities Fee Project Expenditures Requirement 7. Description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and when each will be repaid and the rate of interest the account will receive on the loan.

There were no transfers or loans from this fund in FY 21-22.

Requirement 8. Identification of any refunds made once determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund fee-related projects.

There were no refunds made from this fund in FY 21-22.

Project No. Project Name
Project
Budget1
Fund 315
Expense to
Date
Fund 315
Expense
FY 21-22
Fund 315
Future
Expenditures
% Funded by
Fee
Approx.

Construction
Start Date 1
5631
Library Second Floor Energy Enhancement
Construction/Expansion/Reconfigure
Lighting, Audio/Visual, HVAC ducting
$ - 206,000 - 206,000 $ 100% TBD
GRAND TO TAL 206,000 $ - $ - $ 206,000 $
1) City of Hemet Trial Balance Expenditure Detail FY 21-22.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 6 of 32
Fund 316 – General Facilities Fee
Requirement 1. Brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

The General Facilities Fee finances general office or work facilities and equipment used by City staff to undertake their daily duties. The City first established its DIF Program and the General Facilities Fee on January 23, 2001 with the adoption of Ordinance No. 1639, which revised and renumbered the City Municipal Code. Resolution No. 3837, adopted July 26, 2004, established current fee amounts for non-residential property. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 3981 on January 23, 2006, which established current fee amounts for residential property as recommended by the Nexus Study dated January 3, 2006, prepared by TischlerBise. Per Resolution 3981, the rates for non-residential projects were not updated as it stated that the City Council shall, by separate and subsequent noticed action, consider adjustments to DIFs for commercial and/or industrial projects.

Requirement 2. Amount of the fee.

The General Facilities Fees for FY 21-22 are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3: General Facilities Fee
Land Use Fee Amount
Mobile Home/Senior (per DU) $493
Multi-Family (per DU) $669
Single Family (per DU) $780
Townhome/Duplex (per DU) $591
Commercial/Office (per SF) $0.116
Industrial (per SF) $0.116
Requirement 3. Beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.

Table 4 summarizes the beginning and ending fund balances for the General Facilities Fee for FY 21-22.

Requirement 4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned during the previous year.

Table 4 summarizes the fees collected and the interest earned for the General Facilities Fee during FY 21-22.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 7 of 32
Table 4: General Facilities Fee Fund Summary
Requirement 5. Identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

No project expenditures were recorded for Fund 316 in FY 21-22.

Requirement 6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Table 5 summarizes the planned future expenditures for Fund 316 and the anticipated construction start date. As additional funds become available, the City’s Capital Improvement Budget team will work on identifying and budgeting for eligible projects and will include the projects in future CIP budgets.

Fund 316
General Facilities
Beginning Fund Balance as of July 1, 2021 $ 775,563.64
Revenues
Fees Collected $ 485,149.45
Interest Earned $ 5,776.00
Fair Market Value Adjustment1
$ (23,043.50)
Other Revenues $ -
Total Revenues $ 467,881.95
Expenses
Project Expenses $ -
Other Expenses2
$ (1,475.22)
Total Expenses $ (1,475.22)
Transfers In $ -
Transfers Out $ -
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2022 $ 1,241,970.37
1) Fair Market Value Adjustment accounts for changes in value of City investments over time.
2) Other Expenses include costs for consultant services for reporting requirements.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 8 of 32
Table 5: General Facilities Fee Project Expenditures
Requirement 7. Description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and when each will be repaid and the rate of interest the account will receive on the loan.

There were no transfers or loans from this fund in FY 21-22.

Requirement 8. Identification of any refunds made once determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund fee-related projects.

There were no refunds made from this fund in FY 21-22.

Project No. Project Name
Project
Budget1
Fund 316
Expense to
Date 2
Fund 316
Expense
FY 21-222
Fund 316
Future
Expenditures
% Funded by
Fee
Approx.

Construction
Start Date 1
5667 Police Facility Security Renovation 1,527,000 $ 1,360,352 $ - $ 95% 82,811 In Progress 5721 Clarifier Units for Corporation Yard 107,340 $ - - 107,340 $ 100% TBD TBD Street lights replacement 150,000 $ - - $ 100% 150,000 TBD TBD ADA Compliance Improvements $ 500,000 - - $ 100% 500,000 TBD TBD ERP Upgrades 1,000,000 $ - - $ 100% 1,000,000 TBD
TBD Municipal Building Updates and Expansio $ 500,000 - - $ 100% 500,000 TBD TBD Municipal Building Energy Management
System Update $ - 450,000 - 450,000 $ 100% TBD
GRAND TO TAL 4,234,340 $ 1,360,352 $ - $ 2,790,151 $
1) City of Hemet FY 21-22 Annual Operating Budget & FY 14-15 AB1600 Annual and Five-Year Report. 2) City of Hemet Trial Balance Expenditure Detail FY 21-22.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 9 of 32
Fund 326 – Flood Control (Storm Drainage Facilities) Fee Requirement 1. Brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.

The Flood Control (Storm Drainage Facilities) Fee finances street gutter facilities, inlets, and a pipeline network of storm drain lines which convey runoff to various smaller lines, creeks, aqueducts, and channels throughout the City. The City first established its DIF Program and the Flood Control Fee on January 23, 2001 with the adoption of Ordinance No. 1639, which revised and renumbered the City Municipal Code. Resolution No. 3837, adopted July 26, 2004, established current fee amounts for non-residential property. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 3981 on January 23, 2006, which established current fee amounts for residential property as recommended by the Nexus Study dated January 3, 2006, prepared by TischlerBise. Per Resolution 3981, the rates for non-residential projects were not updated as it stated that the City Council shall, by separate and subsequent noticed action, consider adjustments to DIFs for commercial and/or industrial projects.

Requirement 2. Amount of the fee.

The Flood Control (Storm Drainage Facilities) Fees for Fiscal Year 21-22 are summarized in Table

6. Table 6: Flood Control (Storm Drainage Facilities) Fee Land Use Fee Amount
Mobile Home/Senior (per DU) $1,147
Multi-Family (per DU) $474
Single Family (per DU) $1,405
Townhome/Duplex (per DU) $1,013
Commercial/Office (per SF) $0.402
Industrial (per SF) $0.344
Requirement 3. Beginning and ending balance in the account or fund.

Table 7 summarizes the beginning and ending fund balances for the Flood Control (Storm Drainage Facilities) Fee for FY 21-22.

Requirement 4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned during the previous year.

Table 7 summarizes the fees collected and the interest earned for the Flood Control (Storm Drainage Facilities) Fee during FY 21-22.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 10 of 32
Table 7: Flood Control (Storm Drainage Facilities) Fee Fund Summary

Requirement 5. Identification of each public improvement for which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

Table 8 summarizes the expenditures on Flood Control Fee projects for FY 21-22.

Requirement 6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.

Table 8 summarizes the planned future expenditures for Flood Control Fee and the anticipated construction start date. As additional funds become available, the City’s Capital Improvement Budget team will work on identifying and budgeting for eligible projects and will include the projects in future CIP budgets.

Fund 326
Flood Control
Beginning Fund Balance as of July 1, 2021 $ 4,051,981.75 Revenues
Fees Collected $ 1,172,065.91
Interest Earned $ 23,445.00
Fair Market Value Adjustment1
$ (93,541.11)
Other Revenues $ -
Total Revenues $ 1,101,969.80
Expenses
Project Expenses $ (2,309.61)
Other Expenses2
$ (1,475.22)
Total Expenses $ (3,784.83)
Transfers In $ -
Transfers Out $ -
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2022 $ 5,150,166.72
1) Fair Market Value Adjustment accounts for changes in value of City investments over time.
2) Other Expenses include costs for consultant services for reporting requirements.

17.P

____________________________________________________________________________________ Development Impact Fee Annual Report
City of Hemet Page 11 of 32
Table 8: Flood Control Fee Project Expenditures
Requirement 7. Description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and when each will be repaid and the rate of interest the account will receive on the loan.

There were no transfers or loans from this fund in FY 21-22.

Requirement 8. Identification of any refunds made once determined that sufficient monies have been collected to fund fee-related projects.

There were no refunds made from this fund in FY 21-22.

Project No. Project Name
Project
Budget1
Fund 326
Expense to
Date 2
Fund 326
Expense
FY 21-222
Fund 326
Future
Expenditures
% Funded by
Fee
Approx.

Construction
Start Date 1
5590 State St Storm Drain Replacement 2,750,000 $ 124,478 $ 55 $ 2,625,467 $ 100% In Progress 5592 Westside Storm Drainage Master Plan $ 40,069 500,000 $ 2,255 $ 457,676 $ 100% In Progress 5638 Drainage Master Plan 1,500,000 $ 72,521 $ - $ 100% In Progress 1,427,479 TBD Storm Drain Maintenance 70,000 $ 13,452 $ - $ 100% In Progress 56,548 TBD Chambers Street Drainage Improveme $ 20,000 - - $ 100% TBD 20,000 TBD Cactus Valley Channel 1,161,081 $ - - $ 100% TBD 1,161,081 TBD Avery Canyon 2,050,776 $ - - $ 100% TBD 2,050,776
TBD Pepper Creek 4,985,758 $ - - $ 100% TBD 4,985,758
TBD Menlo Avenure 1,459,886 $ - - $ 100% TBD 1,459,886
TBD Menlo/Cawston 365,605 $ - - $ 100% TBD 365,605
GRAND TO TAL 14,863,106 $ 250,520 $ 2,310 $ 14,610,276 $ 1) City of Hemet FY 21-22 Annual Operating Budget & FY 14-15 AB1600 Annual and Five-Year Report. 2) City of Hemet Trial Balance Expenditure Detail FY 21-22.